Europa-List Digest Archive

Fri 01/24/25


Total Messages Posted: 5



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:12 AM - Re: The Obsidian File - Mono Undercarriage (Area-51)
     2. 05:38 AM - The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive (Area-51)
     3. 05:59 AM - Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive (Pete Zut)
     4. 05:59 AM - Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive (Pete Zut)
     5. 06:38 AM - Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive (Area-51)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:12:22 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: The Obsidian File - Mono Undercarriage
    From: "Area-51" <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com>
    An additional image explaining the "over centre" aspect of the factory undercarriage retraction geometry and why it is a challenge to get the last bit of retraction achieved. The purple indicates the lower factory pivot position of the spring block. The yellow indicates the revised pivot position that prevents an undercarriage lockup scenario and achieves full mechanical advantage of the retraction mechanism. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=515243#515243 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/3dab454d_9d39_4e88_8366_e8851141fd2d_125.jpeg


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:38:57 AM PST US
    Subject: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive
    From: "Area-51" <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com>
    A while back during conversation with another Europan it was explained to me that a Scottish europa had a a unique "effortless" undercarriage mechanism that used an alternate 180 degree throw arm... this intrigued me... so i sat there for about a week and nutted it out and achieved a comparative result. The mechanism uses a third lever running off the existing OEM throw lever. Measurement of the mechanical forces required to action the undercarriage returned very casual numbers regarding physical operator effort required. Attached are three images showing geometry for retracted, midway, and extended. It is a very elegant solution. The extra unchanging yellow canted line marks the OEM factory extended position. During retraction the undercarriage swing arm raises approximately an inch above and then down into its parked position, and vise versa upon extension; it raises slightly first, then drops down to extension. That's all for now on this short and interesting chapter of the Obsidian Files. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=515244#515244 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/38b58ccd_9321_43c7_b25f_8000daa9342e_206.jpeg http://forums.matronics.com//files/690857c0_197a_45b2_9bbf_f093ccdccd34_156.jpeg http://forums.matronics.com//files/8fe5e4d9_1996_4460_86d4_31bca4463468_149.jpeg


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:59:34 AM PST US
    From: Pete Zut <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
    Subject: Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive
    I guess there is always a better mousetrap, but always at the cost of complexity and weight. FWIW, I find the simply, factored-down, mono mechanism design, with the bungees work absolutely fine and with minimal effort. In fact, just like in a performance car, I very much appreciate the ability to feel the forces involved, to be able to assess the mechanical and aero performance of the system. Adding mechanical advantage by definition reduces the feedback feel by the same advantage gained. FWIW Cheers, PeteZ > On Jan 24, 2025, at 8:38AM, Area-51 <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A while back during conversation with another Europan it was explained to me that a Scottish europa had a a unique "effortless" undercarriage mechanism that used an alternate 180 degree throw arm... this intrigued me... so i sat there for about a week and nutted it out and achieved a comparative result. > > The mechanism uses a third lever running off the existing OEM throw lever. Measurement of the mechanical forces required to action the undercarriage returned very casual numbers regarding physical operator effort required. > > Attached are three images showing geometry for retracted, midway, and extended. It is a very elegant solution. > > The extra unchanging yellow canted line marks the OEM factory extended position. > > During retraction the undercarriage swing arm raises approximately an inch above and then down into its parked position, and vise versa upon extension; it raises slightly first, then drops down to extension. > > That's all for now on this short and interesting chapter of the Obsidian Files. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=515244#515244 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/38b58ccd_9321_43c7_b25f_8000daa9342e_206.jpeg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/690857c0_197a_45b2_9bbf_f093ccdccd34_156.jpeg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/8fe5e4d9_1996_4460_86d4_31bca4463468_149.jpeg > > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:59:44 AM PST US
    From: Pete Zut <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
    Subject: Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive
    I guess there is always a better mousetrap, but always at the cost of complexity and weight. FWIW, I find the simply, factored-down, mono mechanism design, with the bungees work absolutely fine and with minimal effort. In fact, just like in a performance car, I very much appreciate the ability to feel the forces involved, to be able to assess the mechanical and aero performance of the system. Adding mechanical advantage by definition reduces the feedback feel by the same advantage gained. FWIW Cheers, PeteZ > On Jan 24, 2025, at 8:38AM, Area-51 <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com> wrote: > > > A while back during conversation with another Europan it was explained to me that a Scottish europa had a a unique "effortless" undercarriage mechanism that used an alternate 180 degree throw arm... this intrigued me... so i sat there for about a week and nutted it out and achieved a comparative result. > > The mechanism uses a third lever running off the existing OEM throw lever. Measurement of the mechanical forces required to action the undercarriage returned very casual numbers regarding physical operator effort required. > > Attached are three images showing geometry for retracted, midway, and extended. It is a very elegant solution. > > The extra unchanging yellow canted line marks the OEM factory extended position. > > During retraction the undercarriage swing arm raises approximately an inch above and then down into its parked position, and vise versa upon extension; it raises slightly first, then drops down to extension. > > That's all for now on this short and interesting chapter of the Obsidian Files. > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=515244#515244 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/38b58ccd_9321_43c7_b25f_8000daa9342e_206.jpeg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/690857c0_197a_45b2_9bbf_f093ccdccd34_156.jpeg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/8fe5e4d9_1996_4460_86d4_31bca4463468_149.jpeg > > > > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:38:03 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: The Obsidian Files - Undercarriage - The Scotland Directive
    From: "Area-51" <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com>
    I totally agree. That is why a 1970's Silver Shadow will never be as exciting to drive as a 1902 American Underslung Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=515246#515246




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   europa-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Europa-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/europa-list
  • Browse Europa-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/europa-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --