Glasair-List Digest Archive

Wed 07/22/09


Total Messages Posted: 1



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:11 AM - Re:100 LL (Dave & Becky Hurd)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:33 AM PST US
    From: "Dave & Becky Hurd" <dbhurd@att.net>
    Subject: Re:100 LL
    Chuck, Can't speak to the Continental or Franklin brands, but Lycoming Service Instruction (1070M) discusses Original Fuel Grades, what those are now, and what foreign fuel grades are found in certain countries. It goes on to say what fuel was used for the original certification for the engine. For example the Glasair II-S standard engine IO-360B (180 HP - 8.5:1 compression ratio) was originally certificated for use with 91/96 avgas and could run on 91/96 UL. The 200 HP IO-360 A or C (8.7:1 compression ratio) was originally certificated to run on 100/130 (now 100LL), and could NOT be run on the 91/96 UL. For the normally aspirated engines, it appears the compression ratio is the key. 8.5:1 or less seems to be OK with the 91/96 UL, higher than that will require the replacement for 100LL. There was originally some concern about the need for TEL to provide lubrication, but I believe that has been addressed. The other issue is the ethanol being introduced into mogas. EAA is adamant that the use of ethanol in any quantity violates the STC they hold for mogas use. That seems to be the big problem for those who would like to use premium mogas in their 8.5:1 (or less) compression ratio engines. Dave Hurd II-S FT (still building, after all these years) Subject: Re: Re: 100LL From: Craymondw@aol.com <mailto:Craymondw@aol.com?subject=Re:%20Re:%20100LL&replyto=d62.3c489 a3e.379 7afa5@aol.com> Date: Tue Jul 21 - 4:57 PM The AOPA article said that general aviation will definitely be running on unleaded mogas with a few extra additives and that unless an engine is turbo charged, it only needs 91 octane. I would like to see data from people flying 200/300 hp engines. I only know one Franklin dealer that says uses it in his 200hp aircraft and claims he has had no problems.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   glasair-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Glasair-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/glasair-list
  • Browse Glasair-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/glasair-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --