Glasair-List Digest Archive

Thu 03/04/10


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:40 PM - Hartzel Blended foil (Craymondw@aol.com)
     2. 06:26 PM - Re: Hartzel Blended foil (Matt Dralle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:40:19 PM PST US
    From: Craymondw@aol.com
    Subject: Hartzel Blended foil
    We had another chance to test our new Hartzel blended foil prop on our Glasair 2S FT-!0360 200 HP engine. We flew the plane with a light cross wind this time and noted a shorter take off roll from the runway end threshold to the hash marks. This time we noted that full take off RPM had settled down to 2600 rpm and that the fluctuating RPM we had on our first flights may have been due to either the prop purging itself of a little air or the oil being a bit warmer. Our last prop required adjusting the hub stop to get 2750 rpm. We climbed to 6,500 feet at a 140 mph indicated airspeed and noted this new prop provided a much higher rate of climb than our old prop did. Once at altitude we flew West at 6,500 feet with 24 inches manifold pressure, 2450 RPM and 50 degrees lean of peak for fifteen miles and recorded GPS ground cruise speeds of 214 mph in one direction and 204 mph on the return course that averaged out to 209 mph and noted an increase of around 15 mph over our old cruise speed. This increase in air speed was a bit lower than the twenty mph increase we noted at 3,000 feet. But this may have been do to slightly warmer temperatures and saturated air from a rain system that was moving in. The visibility for this flight was limited and no were near the crystal clear air we had on our first two tests flights and that may have been the cause. We also noted with our old prop that increasing the RPM over 2350 rpm didn't add to the air speed, but increasing the rpm with the new blended foil did increase airspeed all the way up to 2475 rpm. My guess for this is that the new blended foil has far more bite at higher rpm's than our old prop did. When the weather cooperates we will shoot for 8,500 feet on hopefully a clear day.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:08 PM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Re: Hartzel Blended foil
    Nice report. What was the "old" prop you had? Matt Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV http://www.mattsrv8.com Matt's Building Blog Finishing Up... At 03:27 PM 3/4/2010 Thursday, you wrote: >We had another chance to test our new Hartzel blended foil prop on our Glasair 2S FT-!0360 200 HP engine. We flew the plane with a light cross wind this time and noted a shorter take off roll from the runway end threshold to the hash marks. This time we noted that full take off RPM had settled down to 2600 rpm and that the fluctuating RPM we had on our first flights may have been due to either the prop purging itself of a little air or the oil being a bit warmer. Our last prop required adjusting the hub stop to get 2750 rpm. We climbed to 6,500 feet at a 140 mph indicated airspeed and noted this new prop provided a much higher rate of climb than our old prop did. Once at altitude we flew West at 6,500 feet with 24 inches manifold pressure, 2450 RPM and 50 degrees lean of peak for fifteen miles and recorded GPS ground cruise speeds of 214 mph in one direction and 204 mph on the return course that averaged out to 209 mph and noted an increase of around 15 mph over our old cruise speed. This increase in air speed was a bit lower than the twenty mph increase we noted at 3,000 feet. But this may have been do to slightly warmer temperatures and saturated air from a rain system that was moving in. The visibility for this flight was limited and no were near the crystal clear air we had on our first two tests flights and that may have been the cause. We also noted with our old prop that increasing the RPM over 2350 rpm didn't add to the air speed, but increasing the rpm with the new blended foil did increase airspeed all the way up to 2475 rpm. My guess for this is that the new blended foil has far more bite at higher rpm's than our old prop did. When the weather cooperates we will shoot for 8,500 feet on hopefully a clear day. > Matt G Dralle | Matronics | PO Box 347 | Livermore | CA | 94551 925-606-1001 V | 925-606-6281 F | dralle@matronics.com Email http://www.matronics.com/ WWW | Featuring Products For Aircraft




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   glasair-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Glasair-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/glasair-list
  • Browse Glasair-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/glasair-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --