Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Fri 11/19/04


Total Messages Posted: 49



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:08 AM - Re: NSI EA-81 fuel injection (kurt schrader)
     2. 12:25 AM - Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt). (kurt schrader)
     3. 12:30 AM - Re: Re backup pump (Don and Rex) (kurt schrader)
     4. 12:48 AM - Re: Insurance Company (kurt schrader)
     5. 02:28 AM - Re: Backup for Mikuni pump (BROSCHART)
     6. 04:49 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (Clifford Begnaud)
     7. 06:15 AM - EGT probe depth (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
     8. 06:31 AM - Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt). (Jose M. Toro)
     9. 06:39 AM - Re: ruptured impulse line (Harris, Robert)
    10. 06:53 AM - Re: ruptured impulse line (shortnaked)
    11. 07:03 AM - Re: EGT probe depth (Rick)
    12. 07:09 AM - Re: Insurance Company (Rick)
    13. 07:13 AM - Re: NSI EA-81 fuel injection (Rick)
    14. 07:43 AM - Re: EGT probe depth (Bob Robertson)
    15. 08:39 AM - Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop (Lyle Persels)
    16. 08:45 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (Randy Daughenbaugh)
    17. 08:45 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (Randy Daughenbaugh)
    18. 08:50 AM - Re: Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    19. 09:00 AM - Re: EGT probe depth (skyflyte@comcast.net)
    20. 09:24 AM - Re: NSI EA-81 fuel injection (kurt schrader)
    21. 09:32 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (customtrans@qwest.net)
    22. 09:42 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    23. 09:48 AM - Re: Oil level (kurt schrader)
    24. 10:01 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    25. 10:22 AM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (customtrans@qwest.net)
    26. 02:37 PM - Re: Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop (Lyle Persels)
    27. 02:50 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (Clem Nichols)
    28. 03:14 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (shortnaked)
    29. 03:15 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
    30. 03:19 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (Ron)
    31. 03:26 PM - Re: EGT probe depth (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
    32. 03:56 PM - Pulse line (Rex & Jan Shaw)
    33. 04:10 PM - Ruptured diaphram (Rex & Jan Shaw)
    34. 04:18 PM - Re: NSI EA-81 fuel injection (Rick)
    35. 04:24 PM - Check valve (Rex & Jan Shaw)
    36. 04:49 PM - Re: Ruptured diaphram (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
    37. 05:35 PM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (Randy Daughenbaugh)
    38. 05:49 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (shortnaked)
    39. 05:59 PM - Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! (jdmcbean)
    40. 06:13 PM - Re: Ruptured diaphram (Jim Corner)
    41. 06:54 PM - Re: I am pulling the 532 and switching to a 582 oil (Jerry Liles)
    42. 07:02 PM - Re: Pulse line (Jose M. Toro)
    43. 07:17 PM - Re: ruptured impulse line (Jose M. Toro)
    44. 07:19 PM - Re: Fuel gravity flow (Jerry Liles)
    45. 07:29 PM - Re: Pulse line (Jerry Liles)
    46. 08:24 PM - Re: Check valve (kurt schrader)
    47. 08:37 PM - Re: NSI EA-81 fuel injection (kurt schrader)
    48. 08:44 PM - Re: EGT probe depth (kurt schrader)
    49. 09:52 PM - Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt). (kurt schrader)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:08:46 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=H/LCuIE34kH6TnrGZ8GP1S5PwNEwcmE4MztFlA4kRWkGzg9Wv+vPiduUhm42VgI+MDwrD5QJcsfqXZJUCsMiDNkHl/8Kx5KhWoiysr7dVCoUHVW0v0ja0t9TNzL98i4TLyoWpkqB2TLsQTe/Q4gXpOHHkbht614zVw79UG8IycM= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: NSI EA-81 fuel injection
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> I have the 3A and small turbo. I remember reading something in the book about the performance possibly being better at a little less than full throttle. Maybe runs a little richer? But that doesn't seem to be my problem. It is in the high mid range that it goes lean on me. At full. throttle and full rich I am gettng well under 1400 egt. But at other settings I can barely maintain 1450 or a bit higher full rich. Until I get a better handle on it, I just stay out of that range. It does go richer at higher altitudes. When I finally do a cross country in it, I'll see about high altitude leaning, range figures, true cruise speeds and Mach numbers... :-) I would like injection for more balanced power and most of all, no carb icing problems. Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > Do you run the 3 or 3A Ellison. I am pretty sure we > both are turbo EA-81s. > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:58 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=kzhE4Opc5QMekYh8oz43dCue1JSZevLDCbr55/aDjVkea+PnVW0LhRcKW2tOFG7Zc8gS8cH56zJgAUk2yYjWdiuv59yBSrL9hkbAYoHUbviuOvWDEJ1hUysYHaltnc4qSaHAoCkEsradQJK5c0YTXlX1BgzIE+qi4omfD9V+RYs= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt).
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Jose, You put a lot of thought into your approach. We are each trying to come up with a way of controlling the risks. Problem is that we don't all have the same engines or fuel tanks and carbs. One solution doesn't fit all, so we experiment. And it can get too complex. By now you all have eased back to a simpler solution of routine maintenance instead of redundancy, which doesn't add weight or other risks. For me, I am looking for a good fuel pressure switch to turn on the second pump automatically in series if the first should fall low on pressure. That keeps the system simple, yet gives the backup pump. It is simply the one pump system, but with a second pump that comes on only when needed. I don't ahve the failed diaphram problem. BTW, the Facet pump internal check valves can be the cause of failure. For that reason a second check valve like Peter G uses in his parallel system is necessary. I think his parallel system and my series system are about a toss-up in +/- benefits/risks. It comes down to preferences after that. But his looks prettier... :-) Not bad for 100 days work! Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> wrote: > Kurt: > > The Faucet and Purolator pumps are the same. You > certainly don't want to go as complex (and heavy) as > you described it could get. > > What dou you think about the approach that I > suggested in the e-mail to Don and Rex? > > Just learning... > > Jose __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:30:48 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=yLpToCJQYvwQTbSnCIQCWNDDgTcQcZF8JbmAIxvhj8T66VzS1a4oQrbk16rzrvEMm3PDBIPR54Wad4wLEVzFO19Pn9q6TG8/2mcrfm6ooCRM82lRdQFaOi89BwPBWgfwXJKokGNCHORdIAP3W+Eia325rEekegB67DDn6vcj2Bc= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Re backup pump (Don and Rex)
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Now if we had a strong enough header tank and shut off the vent after the air was out, we could put pumps, filters and check valves at the wing tanks and leave it at that. Pressurize the whole system and skip the pulse pump. Just another dream... Kurt S. --- "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> wrote: > ... the pump to flood the engine in case of a > ruptured diaphram... > > Don and Rex: > > You certainly both have a point! I observed a > Mikuni fuel pump failure before installing the > electric pump, but not after. I can tell that the > parallel configuration won't cause a new problem (as > opposed to in-series), but can't say that it will > solve the problem of the engine sucking gasoline > into the crankcase through the pulse line. I never > before thought about this side effect!!! ..... __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:16 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=2B/1oN8U408lsoUCVvX5Ci3xReIEwHuqOvlb9aHW7qknBF4z2XLygq67BafC0rnvEBtV61gVw4BEATNBzhQxhQHI5mw7uZG5UFx+qNlyOElKuT/dWCiJig//INezuBJ0/6Twx0r4FLpBUxuRf2i4SX4ZkQ8wALDUeMjjXzTknCs= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Insurance Company
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Howard, I've only tested it on the ground with the pump off. In fact, I routinely shut it off while taxiing in after landing. But in flight mine would probably go too lean for me to run it that way. Still trying to keep the egt's low. I can still get a cup of oil in my container after a flight. The plane stays clean, but I go thru more oil than I would like yet. That being said, I am running 5.25 qts. Maybe my origional dipstick is measured wrong? With the pan off, I can see that it measures full at a little above the top of the pan with the plane leveled. That may give me the greater blowby. My stick is so short that I made another stick up to know when I only have 4.25 qts, which is probably enough, but below the origional stick. It was bad to have 4.25 qts and not know if I had any left at all ... :-( Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- Howard Firm <pianome2@mchsi.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kurt schrader" <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Insurance Company > > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader > <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> > > > > Hey Howard, > > > > Do you think your Soob is too quiet to scare > critters and flappers away? > > > > How's the testing coming? Got the oil blowby > > contained? Have you checked your carb temps in > flight yet? I only did one check on mine so far and > the carb temps are much lower with the side outlets > open. I still need to confirm that one test though. > > > > Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo > > > > Testing is going well...I have 9 hours....not great > weather here lately...I > ended up adding a container to catch blowby > oil....but very little has come > out since then...No carb temps test yet...I can > maintain 3500 RPM with the > fuel pump turned off...It's nice to know that I can > get that much > power....have you tested with the pump off? > > Howard Firm


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:28:42 AM PST US
    From: BROSCHART <cfbflyer@localnet.com>
    Subject: Re: Backup for Mikuni pump
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: BROSCHART <cfbflyer@localnet.com> some times new parts are defective so a tried and proven assembly will be the best choice Have a good day - Charlie AlbertaIV@aol.com wrote: > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > > << Listers: > > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new one > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the pulse > line. > > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during its > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. > > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to this > list... > > Jose > >> > > Jose, > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. You > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others that would > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's kept > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused by a > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed in a > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. > > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > > > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:49:34 AM PST US
    From: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless@barefootpilot.com>
    Subject: Re: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless@barefootpilot.com> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > flight. IT FLYS! > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > that > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > 8" from the head. > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:15:42 AM PST US
    From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
    Subject: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com I was looking at an engine the other day that is running around 1100+ degrees EGT's. However the plugs are way too much on the white side. I pulled one of the EGT probes and found that it was installed all the way through the exhaust manifold. The probe was actually jammed against the opposite wall. I'm under the impression that EGT probe tips should be installed near the center of the exhaust pipe/manifold. Does anyone have any idea what the actual temp difference would be if measured at the center versus the opposite wall of an exhaust pipe/manifold. For this question, I'm only interested in depth of the probe not distance from the piston. Thanks, Don Smythe N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:27 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=qd0FWFL69f2oL16NqVcwlWrS+SEMKlkm1Va3oQ6Ch0aray0KD+70CizxDmAwHl9eq7xnY8UpUeScFAkFdftKoIwQY4rh73HJXChPiEY+5KjeTtNyFGf6PIEibUgWNZe+rwBhd3g4WBQ2+DKMkRvALstshfqcZBNSfwzPHHMixYM= ;
    From: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt).
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> Kurt: I'm done with the backup pump issue for Mikuni pumps and 582s...it won't solve the pulse line issue. However, I will be shortly switching to a Jabiru engine, and most likely will use a backup pump in that implementation. Your Subaru engine installation is closer to the Jabiru installion than the 582 installation I currently have. I would like to learn a little bit more about your dual pump approach. What kind of fuel pump is the main in your installation. Are your electric pumps, after the header tank, under the seat like Peter G's? Jose This is all about continuous learning... kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> wrote: --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader Jose, You put a lot of thought into your approach. We are each trying to come up with a way of controlling the risks. Problem is that we don't all have the same engines or fuel tanks and carbs. One solution doesn't fit all, so we experiment. And it can get too complex. By now you all have eased back to a simpler solution of routine maintenance instead of redundancy, which doesn't add weight or other risks. For me, I am looking for a good fuel pressure switch to turn on the second pump automatically in series if the first should fall low on pressure. That keeps the system simple, yet gives the backup pump. It is simply the one pump system, but with a second pump that comes on only when needed. I don't ahve the failed diaphram problem. BTW, the Facet pump internal check valves can be the cause of failure. For that reason a second check valve like Peter G uses in his parallel system is necessary. I think his parallel system and my series system are about a toss-up in +/- benefits/risks. It comes down to preferences after that. But his looks prettier... :-) Not bad for 100 days work! Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- "Jose M. Toro" wrote: > Kurt: > > The Faucet and Purolator pumps are the same. You > certainly don't want to go as complex (and heavy) as > you described it could get. > > What dou you think about the approach that I > suggested in the e-mail to Don and Rex? > > Just learning... > > Jose __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com Jose M. Toro, P.E. Kitfox II/582 "A slow flight in the Caribbean..." ---------------------------------


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:39:38 AM PST US
    From: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com>
    Subject: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> Thanks for the pics Shorty -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shortnaked Subject: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> Here you go guys a failure of an impulse line i changed the other day. posted on this lazair.com site as it the only way i know how to post a pic and share it. http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=268 Plus if you like LAzair ultralights it full of info adn some MOVIES up to 200 mgs http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 all free too gotta like that lol maybe i should start a kitfox thread there for you guys LOL ( i been sneaking some stuff in already adn no complaints) Shorty ----- Original Message ----- From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Backup for Mikuni pump > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > > << Listers: > > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new one > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the pulse > line. > > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during its > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. > > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to this > list... > > Jose > >> > > Jose, > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. You > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others that would > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's kept > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused by a > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed in a > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. > > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:53:20 AM PST US
    From: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> anytime see i live in a real world and like to try to help out others with facts pictures prove it :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> > > Thanks for the pics Shorty > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shortnaked > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> > > Here you go guys a failure of an impulse line i changed the other day. > > posted on this lazair.com site as it the only way i know how to post a pic > and share it. > http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=268 > Plus if you like LAzair ultralights it full of info adn some MOVIES up to > 200 mgs > http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 > > all free too > > gotta like that lol > > maybe i should start a kitfox thread there for you guys LOL ( i been > sneaking some stuff in already adn no complaints) > > Shorty > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Backup for Mikuni pump > > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > > > > << Listers: > > > > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new > one > > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the > pulse > > line. > > > > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during > its > > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. > > > > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to this > > list... > > > > Jose > > >> > > > > Jose, > > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. You > > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others that > would > > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's kept > > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. > > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused by > a > > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed in > a > > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. > > > > Don Smythe > > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > > > > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:03:10 AM PST US
    From: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net>
    Subject: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net> Don, I could check on the instruction that came with my EGT instruments, but I am certain that against the header is not good. Something tells having the tip centered in the pipe is right. I think that is somewhat determined by the length of the probe if I am not mistaken. Someone may have supplied the wrong length for your application. Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of AlbertaIV@aol.com Subject: Kitfox-List: EGT probe depth --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com I was looking at an engine the other day that is running around 1100+ degrees EGT's. However the plugs are way too much on the white side. I pulled one of the EGT probes and found that it was installed all the way through the exhaust manifold. The probe was actually jammed against the opposite wall. I'm under the impression that EGT probe tips should be installed near the center of the exhaust pipe/manifold. Does anyone have any idea what the actual temp difference would be if measured at the center versus the opposite wall of an exhaust pipe/manifold. For this question, I'm only interested in depth of the probe not distance from the piston. Thanks, Don Smythe N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:09:50 AM PST US
    From: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net>
    Subject: Insurance Company
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net> Kurt, If the oil was to the top of the pan , then your cam gear would be churning the heck out of your oil. Also you are covering the vent drain to the rear of the pan and most likely puking the oil out. The lower level would be better. You can take of the vent fitting and fill until it just stars to come out, go slow, and the back off a half or so. Having done that then take a look at the modified vent Tom A. came up with. Good luck. Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of kurt schrader Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Insurance Company --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Howard, I've only tested it on the ground with the pump off. In fact, I routinely shut it off while taxiing in after landing. But in flight mine would probably go too lean for me to run it that way. Still trying to keep the egt's low. I can still get a cup of oil in my container after a flight. The plane stays clean, but I go thru more oil than I would like yet. That being said, I am running 5.25 qts. Maybe my origional dipstick is measured wrong? With the pan off, I can see that it measures full at a little above the top of the pan with the plane leveled. That may give me the greater blowby. My stick is so short that I made another stick up to know when I only have 4.25 qts, which is probably enough, but below the origional stick. It was bad to have 4.25 qts and not know if I had any left at all ... :-( Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- Howard Firm <pianome2@mchsi.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kurt schrader" <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Insurance Company > > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader > <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> > > > > Hey Howard, > > > > Do you think your Soob is too quiet to scare > critters and flappers away? > > > > How's the testing coming? Got the oil blowby > > contained? Have you checked your carb temps in > flight yet? I only did one check on mine so far and > the carb temps are much lower with the side outlets > open. I still need to confirm that one test though. > > > > Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo > > > > Testing is going well...I have 9 hours....not great > weather here lately...I > ended up adding a container to catch blowby > oil....but very little has come > out since then...No carb temps test yet...I can > maintain 3500 RPM with the > fuel pump turned off...It's nice to know that I can > get that much > power....have you tested with the pump off? > > Howard Firm


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:45 AM PST US
    From: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net>
    Subject: NSI EA-81 fuel injection
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net> That sounds right. BTW at 17,900 MSL I had no high EGT problems even at full power and an a GPS GS of about 170. Only did that once. :) Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of kurt schrader Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: NSI EA-81 fuel injection --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> I have the 3A and small turbo. I remember reading something in the book about the performance possibly being better at a little less than full throttle. Maybe runs a little richer? But that doesn't seem to be my problem. It is in the high mid range that it goes lean on me. At full. throttle and full rich I am gettng well under 1400 egt. But at other settings I can barely maintain 1450 or a bit higher full rich. Until I get a better handle on it, I just stay out of that range. It does go richer at higher altitudes. When I finally do a cross country in it, I'll see about high altitude leaning, range figures, true cruise speeds and Mach numbers... :-) I would like injection for more balanced power and most of all, no carb icing problems. Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > Do you run the 3 or 3A Ellison. I am pretty sure we > both are turbo EA-81s. > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:59 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Robertson" <aerocontrols@clearwave.ca>
    Subject: Re: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Robertson" <aerocontrols@clearwave.ca> Hi Don, I just went out to the shop and looked at a "clamp-on type" EGT probe installed into a 582 manifold. The tip of the probe is about 1/8" away from the opposite wall of the manifold (i.e. almost all the way across). Seeing as this type of EGT probe was the norm, up till rotax started putting weld-on bosses to mount the EGTs, I would take this as correct. Always trust the plugs rather than the gauge unless, o course, you are installnig real expensive EGT gauses (Alcor etc). Did this airplane run on any Av-gas cause that can cause a lighter color than mo-gas. You might want to try new probes or a new gauge itself. These Westburg and import gauges are notorious for being inaccurate. They do give us a chance to see day to day changes in our exhaust gas temps, which is what we want anyway. regards Bob Robertson Light Engine Services Ltd. Rotax Service Center St. Albert, Ab. T8N 1M8 Ph: (Tech Support) 1-780-418-4164 Ph: (Order Line) 1-866-418-4164 (TOLL FREE) www.rtx-av-engines.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> Subject: Kitfox-List: EGT probe depth > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > > I was looking at an engine the other day that is running around 1100+ > degrees EGT's. However the plugs are way too much on the white side. I pulled > one of the EGT probes and found that it was installed all the way through the > exhaust manifold. The probe was actually jammed against the opposite wall. > I'm under the impression that EGT probe tips should be installed near the > center of the exhaust pipe/manifold. Does anyone have any idea what the > actual temp difference would be if measured at the center versus the opposite wall > of an exhaust pipe/manifold. > For this question, I'm only interested in depth of the probe not distance > from the piston. > > Thanks, > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:02 AM PST US
    From: Lyle Persels <lpers@mchsi.com>
    Subject: Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels <lpers@mchsi.com> After 400 hours on my Model IV, I remain pleased with the 912UL's smoothness, economy and power when operating at cruise rpm. However, from the beginning I've struggled with roughness-often extreme- below, say, 2500 rpm. I have all the manuals, have balanced (both mechanical and with vacuum guage) and tinkered and adjusted linkages with extreme care, have cleaned carbs carefully, replaced many carb parts (flanges, diaphragms, jets, needles, o-rings), and looked for possible intake leaks. In addition to roughness, I've always had a drop on the individual ignition circuit checks of slightly greater than 300 rpm on each circuit. Replacing the plugs helps a little for a short time. I've done this much too frequently, at 20-25 hour intervals. I've replaced a faulty coil and ignition module (now $782) but I doubt that these related to the mag drop problems. I've followed the list on these topics for years, so I know my experiences aren't unique. Yet I can't believe most 912 operators experience these problems with the severity and frequency that have plagued my love-hate relationship with the engine. I just can't believe these conditions "have to be." Can anyone offer suggestions, information, or even condolences? Lyle Persels > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:56 AM PST US
    From: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com>
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> Kurt, The answer is, "Not soon enough!" I didn't fly at all while I was building and for a couple of years before that. I found that my feet had forgotten what they were for. I have been flying with my friend in his Fox and am pretty close now to getting turned loose. While I am anxious to fly, I don't want to bend my plane. I would advise people who are building to do some flying while building. It is frustrating to have a pretty plane just sitting there while you are trying to get the pilot back into flying shape. Randy . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kurt schrader Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Congrats Randy! When are you going to take the stick yourself and get some flight time? Kurt S. --- Randy Daughenbaugh <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> wrote: > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my > plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:56 AM PST US
    From: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com>
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless@barefootpilot.com> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > flight. IT FLYS! > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > that > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > 8" from the head. > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:50:59 AM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net what color are the plugs when you change them? is the mag drop the same for both sides? what settings on the circlip on the needle? what main jets are you running? does this happen year round or at season change? John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels > > After 400 hours on my Model IV, I remain pleased with the 912UL's > smoothness, economy and power when operating at cruise rpm. However, > from the beginning I've struggled with roughness-often extreme- below, > say, 2500 rpm. I have all the manuals, have balanced (both mechanical > and with vacuum guage) and tinkered and adjusted linkages with extreme > care, have cleaned carbs carefully, replaced many carb parts (flanges, > diaphragms, jets, needles, o-rings), and looked for possible intake leaks. > > In addition to roughness, I've always had a drop on the individual > ignition circuit checks of slightly greater than 300 rpm on each > circuit. Replacing the plugs helps a little for a short time. I've done > this much too frequently, at 20-25 hour intervals. I've replaced a > faulty coil and ignition module (now $782) but I doubt that these > related to the mag drop problems. > > I've followed the list on these topics for years, so I know my > experiences aren't unique. Yet I can't believe most 912 operators > experience these problems with the severity and frequency that have > plagued my love-hate relationship with the engine. I just can't believe > these conditions "have to be." > > Can anyone offer suggestions, information, or even condolences? > > Lyle Persels > > > > > > > > > > > > what color are the plugs when you change them? is the mag drop the same for both sides? what settings on the circlip on the needle? what main jets are you running? does this happen year round or at season change? John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels <LPERS@MCHSI.COM> After 400 hours on my Model IV, I remain pleased with the 912UL's smoothness, economy and power when operating at cruise rpm. However, from the beginning I've struggled with roughness-often extreme- below, say, 2500 rpm. I have all the manuals, have balanced (both mechanical and with vacuum guage) and tinkered and adjusted linkages with extreme care, have cleaned carbs carefully, replaced many carb parts (flanges, diaphragms, jets, needles, o-rings), and looked for possible intake leaks. In addition to roughness, I've always had a drop on the individual ignition circuit checks of slightly greater than 300 rpm on each circuit. Replacing the plugs helps a litt le for a short time. I've done this much too frequently, at 20-25 hour intervals. I've replaced a faulty coil and ignition module (now $782) but I doubt that these related to the mag drop problems. I've followed the list on these topics for years, so I know my experiences aren't unique. Yet I can't believe most 912 operators experience these problems with the severity and frequency that have plagued my love-hate relationship with the engine. I just can't believe these conditions "have to be." Can anyone offer suggestions, information, or even condolences? Lyle Persels is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the /SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:00:42 AM PST US
    From: skyflyte@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: skyflyte@comcast.net I used to manufacture EGT gauges and always recommended that the probe be placed in the middle of the exhaust flow. You can raise the probe tip by placing 3/16" ID washers over the probe before inseting it in the manifold. And I also agree that the color of your plugs is the best indicator of a correct or incorrect mixture. When the mixture is correct then the EGT gauge is used to detect changes for what is normal. Some EGT gauges don't even have a temperature scale, the readings are always relative! Mike Cannon -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Robertson" > > Hi Don, > I just went out to the shop and looked at a "clamp-on type" EGT probe > installed into a 582 manifold. The tip of the probe is about 1/8" away from > the opposite wall of the manifold (i.e. almost all the way across). Seeing > as this type of EGT probe was the norm, up till rotax started putting > weld-on bosses to mount the EGTs, I used to manufacture EGT gauges and always recommended that the probe be placed in the middle of the exhaust flow. You can raise the probe tip by placing 3/16" ID washers over the probe before inseting it in the manifold. And I also agree that the color of your plugs is the best indicator of a correct or incorrect mixture. When the mixture is correct then the EGT gauge is used to detect changes for what is normal. Some EGT gauges don't even have a temperature scale, the readings are always relative! Mike Cannon -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Bob Robertson" <AEROCONTROLS@CLEARWAVE.CA> Hi Don, I just went out to the shop and looked at a "clamp-on type" EGT probe installed into a 582 manifold. The tip of the probe is about 1/8" away from the opposite wall of the manifold (i.e. almost all the way across). Seeing as this type of EGT probe was the norm, up till rotax started putting weld-on bosses to mount the EGTs,


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:24:49 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=Terjg+h1htFAhriY4G7O8klyOemFeZRfIL6SoZteP9phSN7yDnbsSPSbougHPpLuvjWWVhWEOrkFW7z5wtPGiS0bzEC4Td5rljTyBBZgMIFsx3+ohJK4uDhgh6KbhKpQ3aKlFvDTmEmmMtCc6NTqYT4biYNJx6bUnzV4PLhGD8c= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: NSI EA-81 fuel injection
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> I haven't found an oxygen source for under $400 yet, so I haven't been near that high. Did you see at what altitude the power started to drop off? If I remember, Lance said the turbo was good for 100% to 12-14,000 feet. What was your fuel flow at 170,900 and 170? Not that I would do that regularily either. But from the FF you can guess pretty closely on the hp you were able to use up there. Well, I have the small turbo, so results will vary. Kurt S. --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > That sounds right. BTW at 17,900 MSL I had no high > EGT problems even at full power and an a GPS GS of > about 170. Only did that once. :) > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:32:57 AM PST US
    From: customtrans@qwest.net
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net One problem with checking the spark plugs is to do it at high rpm and then shut down then check plugs. Don't idle back down then shut down, will make false reading because the idle circuits on the rotax are usually richer. steve a -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Daughenbaugh Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <shoeless@barefootpilot.com> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > flight. IT FLYS! > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > that > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > 8" from the head. > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? >


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:42:08 AM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net aah, but the idle period is when he is having the problem. It seems that if the idle mixture setting and/or the needle setting is/are too rich then the described symptoms could be exhibited. At the rpm where we usually check for mag drop the engine is running on a blend of both needle and idle mixtures. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net > > One problem with checking the spark plugs is to do it at high rpm and then > shut down then check plugs. Don't idle back down then shut down, will make > false reading because the idle circuits on the rotax are usually richer. > steve a > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy > Daughenbaugh > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" > > > Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, > I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's > info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need > to change the setting in the EIS. !! > > And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may > be OK. > > I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at > an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place > for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by > steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. > > Randy > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford > Begnaud > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" > > > Randy, > Congrats on the first flight! > What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer > than 8". > Cliff > Erie, co > > > > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > > flight. IT FLYS! > > > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > > that > > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > > 8" from the head. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? > > > > > > > > aah, but the idle period is when he is having the problem. It seems that if the idle mixture setting and/or the needle setting is/are too rich then the described symptoms could be exhibited. At the rpm where we usually check for mag drop the engine is running on a blend of both needle and idle mixtures. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net One problem with checking the spark plugs is to do it at high rpm and then shut down then check plugs. Don't idle back down then shut down, will make false reading because the idle circuits on the rotax are usually richer. steve a -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Daughenbaugh To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <RJDAUGH@RAPIDNET.COM> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate m yself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! < BR> -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <SHOELESS@BAREFOOTPILOT.COM> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes that the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is 8" from the head. I would appreciate any comments and help. Randy - Did I mention it fly s!? ads or any other s: http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:48:58 AM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=RNbhBLsf/PzvE2KQwmjJbjWIGGPz7zVFgwL/gl2BbH/XrgtGgbw/uyXxqBfU+XxrI+XJDVlSpLg3iznE0/dDw9b2O8Pyks+G6+0tZW535RUsL79EQM2Njv0yDO3YuUOVzM9TGF8CIWREI6/KdBtFWvddMiuspLxdPQmRcVK/FCY= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Oil level
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> That's the kind of problems I was worried about with it that full. Until I pulled the pan off, I didn't know where the dip stick level was. If you get the chance, please measure your dip stick length to the full mark. I'd like to compare it to mine. Many problems can come from simply having the wrong dip stick provided. Maybe I do With the oil below the rear pan/seperator drain, the level would be far below the tip of my dipstick in the 3 point position, or even leveled. Maybe an inch short when leveled. No way to preflight it without my new dipstick. Unfortunately the new one doesn't seal in the engine, so I carry it seperately. I have been running at about the tip of the old dipstick where the level just barely shows on preflight. That is still above the rear fitting in 3 point, even though it is maybe 1.5 qts below the full mark with the plane leveled. I worry about my oil temp going higher with less oil for cooling. Are Tom's modified vent pics on SportFlight? The people in Africa that bought 10 NSI engines moved the return line to the front side of the pan to raise the return above the oil in 3 point position. Even this would not work with my dipstick level. Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > Kurt, > If the oil was to the top of the pan , then your cam > gear would be churning > the heck out of your oil. Also you are covering the > vent drain to the rear > of the pan and most likely puking the oil out. The > lower level would be > better. You can take of the vent fitting and fill > until it just stars to > come out, go slow, and the back off a half or so. > Having done that then take > a look at the modified vent Tom A. came up with. > Good luck. > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:01:19 AM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) is not affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" > > Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, > I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's > info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need > to change the setting in the EIS. !! > > And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may > be OK. > > I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at > an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place > for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by > steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. > > Randy > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford > Begnaud > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" > > > Randy, > Congrats on the first flight! > What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer > than 8". > Cliff > Erie, co > > > > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > > flight. IT FLYS! > > > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > > that > > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > > 8" from the head. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? > > > > > > > > obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) isnot affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <RJDAUGH@RAPIDNET.COM> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . & gt; -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <SHOELESS@BAREFOOTPILOT.COM> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes that the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is 8" from the head. I would appreciate any comments and help. Randy - Did I mention it flys!? ! .matronics.com/archives


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:22:24 AM PST US
    From: customtrans@qwest.net
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net My thoughts were to set idle for mag check and then shut down and check spark plugs. steve a -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of kerrjohna@comcast.net Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net aah, but the idle period is when he is having the problem. It seems that if the idle mixture setting and/or the needle setting is/are too rich then the described symptoms could be exhibited. At the rpm where we usually check for mag drop the engine is running on a blend of both needle and idle mixtures. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net > > One problem with checking the spark plugs is to do it at high rpm and then > shut down then check plugs. Don't idle back down then shut down, will make > false reading because the idle circuits on the rotax are usually richer. > steve a > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy > Daughenbaugh > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" > > > Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, > I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's > info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need > to change the setting in the EIS. !! > > And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may > be OK. > > I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at > an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place > for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by > steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. > > Randy > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford > Begnaud > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" > > > Randy, > Congrats on the first flight! > What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer > than 8". > Cliff > Erie, co > > > > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > > flight. IT FLYS! > > > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > > that > > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > > 8" from the head. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? > > > > aah, but the idle period is when he is having the problem. It seems that if the idle mixture setting and/or the needle setting is/are too rich then the described symptoms could be exhibited. At the rpm where we usually check for mag drop the engine is running on a blend of both needle and idle mixtures. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: customtrans@qwest.net One problem with checking the spark plugs is to do it at high rpm and then shut down then check plugs. Don't idle back down then shut down, will make false reading because the idle circuits on the rotax are usually richer. steve a -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Daughenbaugh To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <RJDAUGH@RAPIDNET.COM> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate m yself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! < BR> -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <SHOELESS@BAREFOOTPILOT.COM> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes that the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is 8" from the head. I would appreciate any comments and help. Randy - Did I mention it fly s!? ads or any other s: http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:37:55 PM PST US
    From: Lyle Persels <lpers@mchsi.com>
    Subject: Re: Rotax 912 Roughness and mag drop
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels <lpers@mchsi.com> Plug color: ceramic varies from mid brown toward black, but not heavily sooted. Mag drop same for both sides: Yes Circlip settings. Position #2 per manual. Main jets: 158 per manual Seasonal? No, year round, but some seasonal variation. My record keeping hasn't been so meticulous as to relate variations to temperature/humidity. I appreciate your interest. Lyle Persels kerrjohna@comcast.net wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net > >what color are the plugs when you change them? > >is the mag drop the same for both sides? > >what settings on the circlip on the needle? > >what main jets are you running? > >does this happen year round or at season change? > >John Kerr > >-------------- Original message -------------- > > > >>--> Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels >> >>After 400 hours on my Model IV, I remain pleased with the 912UL's >>smoothness, economy and power when operating at cruise rpm. However, >>from the beginning I've struggled with roughness-often extreme- below, >>say, 2500 rpm. I have all the manuals, have balanced (both mechanical >>and with vacuum guage) and tinkered and adjusted linkages with extreme >>care, have cleaned carbs carefully, replaced many carb parts (flanges, >>diaphragms, jets, needles, o-rings), and looked for possible intake leaks. >> >>In addition to roughness, I've always had a drop on the individual >>ignition circuit checks of slightly greater than 300 rpm on each >>circuit. Replacing the plugs helps a little for a short time. I've done >>this much too frequently, at 20-25 hour intervals. I've replaced a >>faulty coil and ignition module (now $782) but I doubt that these >>related to the mag drop problems. >> >>I've followed the list on these topics for years, so I know my >>experiences aren't unique. Yet I can't believe most 912 operators >>experience these problems with the severity and frequency that have >>plagued my love-hate relationship with the engine. I just can't believe >>these conditions "have to be." >> >>Can anyone offer suggestions, information, or even condolences? >> >>Lyle Persels >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >what color are the plugs when you change them? > >is the mag drop the same for both sides? > >what settings on the circlip on the needle? > >what main jets are you running? > >does this happen year round or at season change? > >John Kerr > >-------------- Original message -------------- > > -- Kitfox-List message posted by: Lyle Persels <LPERS@MCHSI.COM> > > After 400 hours on my Model IV, I remain pleased with the 912UL's > smoothness, economy and power when operating at cruise rpm. However, > from the beginning I've struggled with roughness-often extreme- below, > say, 2500 rpm. I have all the manuals, have balanced (both mechanical > and with vacuum guage) and tinkered and adjusted linkages with extreme > care, have cleaned carbs carefully, replaced many carb parts (flanges, > diaphragms, jets, needles, o-rings), and looked for possible intake leaks. > > In addition to roughness, I've always had a drop on the individual > ignition circuit checks of slightly greater than 300 rpm on each > circuit. Replacing the plugs helps a litt > le for a short time. I've done > this much too frequently, at 20-25 hour intervals. I've replaced a > faulty coil and ignition module (now $782) but I doubt that these > related to the mag drop problems. > > I've followed the list on these topics for years, so I know my > experiences aren't unique. Yet I can't believe most 912 operators > experience these problems with the severity and frequency that have > plagued my love-hate relationship with the engine. I just can't believe > these conditions "have to be." > > Can anyone offer suggestions, information, or even condolences? > > Lyle Persels > > > is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on the > /SUBSCRIBE: http://www.matronics.com/subscription > > > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:50:35 PM PST US
    From: "Clem Nichols" <cnichols@scrtc.com>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clem Nichols" <cnichols@scrtc.com> Am I mistaken, or is it OK to use regular automotive fuel line as an impulse line? Clem Nichols ----- Original Message ----- From: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> > > anytime > > see i live in a real world and like to try to help out others with facts > > pictures prove it > > :) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Harris, Robert" > <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> >> >> Thanks for the pics Shorty >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shortnaked >> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line >> >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> >> >> Here you go guys a failure of an impulse line i changed the other day. >> >> posted on this lazair.com site as it the only way i know how to post a > pic >> and share it. >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=268 >> Plus if you like LAzair ultralights it full of info adn some MOVIES up >> to >> 200 mgs >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 >> >> all free too >> >> gotta like that lol >> >> maybe i should start a kitfox thread there for you guys LOL ( i been >> sneaking some stuff in already adn no complaints) >> >> Shorty >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> >> To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> >> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Backup for Mikuni pump >> >> >> > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com >> > >> > << Listers: >> > >> > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new >> one >> > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the >> pulse >> > line. >> > >> > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during >> its >> > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. >> > >> > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to >> > this >> > list... >> > >> > Jose >> > >> >> > >> > Jose, >> > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. > You >> > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others > that >> would >> > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's > kept >> > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. >> > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused > by >> a >> > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed > in >> a >> > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. >> > >> > Don Smythe >> > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 >> > >> > >> >> > > >


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:20 PM PST US
    From: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> someone had it on this plane with a 582 this is what happened. fuel line should not be automotive either use urethane NOT TYGON TYGON will harden ina a year hope this helps you Shorty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clem Nichols" <cnichols@scrtc.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clem Nichols" <cnichols@scrtc.com> > > Am I mistaken, or is it OK to use regular automotive fuel line as an impulse > line? > > Clem Nichols > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> > > > > anytime > > > > see i live in a real world and like to try to help out others with facts > > > > pictures prove it > > > > :) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Harris, Robert" <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> > > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > > > > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Harris, Robert" > > <Robert_Harris@intuit.com> > >> > >> Thanks for the pics Shorty > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > >> [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shortnaked > >> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > >> Subject: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > >> > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> > >> > >> Here you go guys a failure of an impulse line i changed the other day. > >> > >> posted on this lazair.com site as it the only way i know how to post a > > pic > >> and share it. > >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=268 > >> Plus if you like LAzair ultralights it full of info adn some MOVIES up > >> to > >> 200 mgs > >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 > >> > >> all free too > >> > >> gotta like that lol > >> > >> maybe i should start a kitfox thread there for you guys LOL ( i been > >> sneaking some stuff in already adn no complaints) > >> > >> Shorty > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> > >> To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > >> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Backup for Mikuni pump > >> > >> > >> > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > >> > > >> > << Listers: > >> > > >> > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new > >> one > >> > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the > >> pulse > >> > line. > >> > > >> > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during > >> its > >> > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. > >> > > >> > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to > >> > this > >> > list... > >> > > >> > Jose > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Jose, > >> > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. > > You > >> > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others > > that > >> would > >> > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's > > kept > >> > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. > >> > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused > > by > >> a > >> > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed > > in > >> a > >> > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. > >> > > >> > Don Smythe > >> > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:15:15 PM PST US
    From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com << Am I mistaken, or is it OK to use regular automotive fuel line as an impulse line? Clem Nichols >> Clem, That is a good question. CPS and Spruce sells clear Poly line that is specifically for the pulse line. The last order I received, it measured exactly the same as the clear Poly fuel line I ordered. I've used it and haven't seen any problems. I think the pulse line needs to have a "beefier" wall thickness but haven't seen too much on this issue. If I were using auto fuel line, I'd use the R-9 fuel injection type for the pulse line??? Still unsure on this issue?? Don Smythe N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:19:05 PM PST US
    From: "Ron" <rliebmann@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Ron" <rliebmann@comcast.net> Hi Clem, I use a length of aluminum fuel line connected at both ends with a short piece of rubber fuel line for my impulse tube. It can't collapse and works great for the 12 years I have flown my Fox.. Ron


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:26:49 PM PST US
    From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
    Subject: Re: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com In a message dated 11/19/04 7:46:00 AM Pacific Standard Time, aerocontrols@clearwave.ca writes: << Hi Don, I just went out to the shop and looked at a "clamp-on type" EGT probe installed into a 582 manifold. The tip of the probe is about 1/8" away from the opposite wall of the manifold (i.e. almost all the way across). Seeing as this type of EGT probe was the norm, up till rotax started putting weld-on bosses to mount the EGTs, I would take this as correct. Always trust the plugs rather than the gauge unless, o course, you are installnig real expensive EGT gauses (Alcor etc). Did this airplane run on any Av-gas cause that can cause a lighter color than mo-gas. You might want to try new probes or a new gauge itself. These Westburg and import gauges are notorious for being inaccurate. They do give us a chance to see day to day changes in our exhaust gas temps, which is what we want anyway. regards Bob Robertson >> Bob, Good to hear from you. How's the bears up your way? No, the engine did not use any av-gas. Everything I've looked at calls for a 1/2 penetration of the probe into the exhaust manifold and, that almost makes sense. Again, my biggest question is, what is the temp difference if you insert the probe 1/4, 1/2 or, all the way to the back wall???? If the temp difference is small then, this is not a concern. If the temp difference is 200 or more degrees then it becomes very important. Don Smythe N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:56:22 PM PST US
    From: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
    Subject: Pulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com> Going back to the backup pump theme, it would not work with the Mikuni because of the pulse line, but could be a good alternative for other type of pumps. However, that my friend is another story beyond the scope of the 582ers. Jose, I'm not sure if I follow you correctly. Why do you say the backup pump system won't work with the Mikuni because of the pulse line ? Is it because if the pulse line leaks that we will have some degradation of crankcase pressures ? Rex. rexjan@bigpond.com


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:10:01 PM PST US
    From: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
    Subject: Ruptured diaphram
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com> On the diaphragm rupture thing,,,,,I would bet by the time you realize you have a ruptured diaphragm, it will be too late to twist a valve, select a bypass or, turn on a pump. Don, I agree and feel the diaphram could suddenly split and cause flooding due to sucking fuel into the crankcase through the pulse line quicker than you can react. However as pointed out elsewhere this is more likely to be gradual. Also if it is sudden wouldn't we be likely to be able to turn the tap/valve to the Mikuni pump off even after the motor flooded and stopped and simply restart it on the backup pump. I think that the prop would continue to windmill after the motor ceased firing due to flooding and continue windmilling after we turned off the valve/tap so pumping out the flooding. Starting should then simply mean turning on the backup pump to get the right mixture again. The motor hopefully will windmill at more than 300RPM required for the CDI"S if we have them and so simply fire up again. Rex. rexjan@bigpond.com


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:18:15 PM PST US
    From: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net>
    Subject: NSI EA-81 fuel injection
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rick" <turboflyer@comcast.net> You know I don't remember and I was pretty focused just on flying so I didn't take notes. I do remember I was still climbing at 500FPM and was still above sea level pressure. I just used a simple O2 bottle with basic regulator at dialed it up as I went up, kind of spooky for me and the little fox. Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of kurt schrader Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: NSI EA-81 fuel injection --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> I haven't found an oxygen source for under $400 yet, so I haven't been near that high. Did you see at what altitude the power started to drop off? If I remember, Lance said the turbo was good for 100% to 12-14,000 feet. What was your fuel flow at 170,900 and 170? Not that I would do that regularily either. But from the FF you can guess pretty closely on the hp you were able to use up there. Well, I have the small turbo, so results will vary. Kurt S. --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > That sounds right. BTW at 17,900 MSL I had no high > EGT problems even at full power and an a GPS GS of > about 170. Only did that once. :) > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:24:14 PM PST US
    From: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
    Subject: Check valve
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com> I don't think there is any need to add a check valve to the Facet as it has one internally. That's one less plumbing item needed. Good point Darrell, I didn't realise that the Facet pump had a non return check valve. However when one thinks about it I suppose it has to. I think this does indeed simplify matters. In fact I think it means we would not need a tap/valve say under the instrument panel for that line or the electric solenoid I suggested. I really need to think that through a bit though. Rex. rexjan@bigpond.com


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:49:52 PM PST US
    From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Ruptured diaphram
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com << likely to be gradual. Also if it is sudden wouldn't we be likely to be able to turn the tap/valve to the Mikuni pump off even after the motor flooded and stopped and simply restart it on the backup pump. I think that the prop would continue to windmill after the motor ceased firing due to flooding and continue windmilling after we turned off the valve/tap so pumping out the flooding. Starting should then simply mean turning on the backup pump to g >> I have no idea how hard it would be to start a flooded engine of that sort. Someone has to go test it. Until it's tested, I have to assume it would be impossible. Assume the Mik pump fails and you kick in the bypass. If you don't have the system plumbed where all inputs/outputs of the Mic are isolated, that backup fuel is going to continue to fill the crankcase through the Mik/pulse line. There is a check valve in the MIk pump outlet (I was wrong before) that will keep the bypass fuel from entering backwards into the pump. However, the inlet will still see pressure from the backup pump. Plumbing gets difficult. The biggest obstacle is detecting the problem in time to make a corrective action. This is an old topic and always gives me a headache. Don Smythe N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:42 PM PST US
    From: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com>
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful.... John, Do you have a suggestion on where to get one? And thanks for your info below. It does sound like trouble shooting the carb would be a chore. Since John McBean says EGT's are in the right range for full throttle operation, I think I will try some more flying (either me or my friend) some more and get a read on the plugs as Don suggested with Steve's procedure. Thanks, Randy - N10NH . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kerrjohna@comcast.net Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) is not affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" > > Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, > I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's > info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need > to change the setting in the EIS. !! > > And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may > be OK. > > I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at > an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place > for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by > steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. > > Randy > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford > Begnaud > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" > > > Randy, > Congrats on the first flight! > What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer > than 8". > Cliff > Erie, co > > > > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > > flight. IT FLYS! > > > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > > that > > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > > 8" from the head. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? > > > > > > > > obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) isnot affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <RJDAUGH@RAPIDNET.COM> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . & gt; -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <SHOELESS@BAREFOOTPILOT.COM> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes that the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is 8" from the head. I would appreciate any comments and help. Randy - Did I mention it flys!? ! .matronics.com/archives


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:49:11 PM PST US
    From: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" <shortnaked@golden.net> Don you are correct, Fuel injection line is ok but not regular fuel line. there is a heavy wall urethane line as wall with double the thickness of regular 1/4 " line. I think it is 1/8 wall -- regualr is 1/16 wall ( i think ) Shorty ----- Original Message ----- From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > > << > Am I mistaken, or is it OK to use regular automotive fuel line as an impulse > line? > > Clem Nichols >> > > Clem, > That is a good question. CPS and Spruce sells clear Poly line that is > specifically for the pulse line. The last order I received, it measured exactly > the same as the clear Poly fuel line I ordered. I've used it and haven't > seen any problems. I think the pulse line needs to have a "beefier" wall > thickness but haven't seen too much on this issue. > If I were using auto fuel line, I'd use the R-9 fuel injection type for > the pulse line??? Still unsure on this issue?? > > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > >


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:59:16 PM PST US
    From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@cableone.net>
    Subject: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys!
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@cableone.net> Try http://www.bingcarburetor.com/ I believe the manuals are $8.95 Blue Skies John & Debra McBean www.sportplanellc.com "The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground" -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Randy Daughenbaugh Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful.... John, Do you have a suggestion on where to get one? And thanks for your info below. It does sound like trouble shooting the carb would be a chore. Since John McBean says EGT's are in the right range for full throttle operation, I think I will try some more flying (either me or my friend) some more and get a read on the plugs as Don suggested with Steve's procedure. Thanks, Randy - N10NH . -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kerrjohna@comcast.net Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kerrjohna@comcast.net obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) is not affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" > > Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, > I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's > info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need > to change the setting in the EIS. !! > > And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may > be OK. > > I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at > an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place > for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by > steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. > > Randy > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford > Begnaud > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" > > > Randy, > Congrats on the first flight! > What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer > than 8". > Cliff > Erie, co > > > > > A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first > > flight. IT FLYS! > > > > But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes > > that > > the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. > > The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. > > > > I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is > > 8" from the head. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and help. > > > > Randy - Did I mention it flys!? > > > > obtaining a Bing manual can be very helpful. there are 3 overlapping ranges with the bing carb: Idle, Idle/needle, needle, needle/main jet, and main jet(full throttle). This makes interpretting the carb operation a bit challenging. When I feel mine are exactly in tune with weather, altitude, etc there is little variation of EGT when moving from full throttle down to an economy cruise. Most times, depending on conditions the EGT will rise or fall slightly as the throttle is retarded. The carburators that Bing makes are at the same time sensitive and forgiving. My first guess is that the idle mixture is set too rich. I am not sure if I remember correctly but it seems that the idle screw is factory-set at about 2 1/2 turns. As I worked with mine to obtain peak rpms at idle the setting ended up in the neighborhood of 1/2 turn from full off. My altitude is 4450' and idle (nor main jet) isnot affected by the "compression compensation" built into the carb. John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy Daughenbaugh" <RJDAUGH@RAPIDNET.COM> Thanks Cliff, John, and Don, I do need to educate myself more on what jet is in the carb, but John's info makes it look like it is doing what it is supposed to do. - I just need to change the setting in the EIS. !! And as Don pointed out, I need to get a read from the spark plugs. All may be OK. I need to check the distance from the piston again. I have the plane out at an airport on the plains right now. I thought that would be a better place for the first flights than here at my strip. My strip is surrounded by steep cliffs and mountains with limited emergency landing options. Randy . & gt; -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clifford Begnaud To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 912S exhaust temperature and N10NH Flys! -- Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clifford Begnaud" <SHOELESS@BAREFOOTPILOT.COM> Randy, Congrats on the first flight! What is main jet # that is installed? On our 912 the probe was much closer than 8". Cliff Erie, co A friend, CFI and very experienced pilot, flew my plane for its first flight. IT FLYS! But under full power (912S) the EGT went to 1600 F. I have in my notes that the max EGT is 1500 for the 912S. ...but I am not sure where I got that. The 1500 is what I set in as a limit in the Grand Rapids EIS. I installed the probes according to the EIS instructions. I believe it is 8" from the head. I would appreciate any comments and help. Randy - Did I mention it flys!? ! .matronics.com/archives


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:13:56 PM PST US
    From: Jim Corner <jcorner@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Ruptured diaphram
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jim Corner <jcorner@shaw.ca> Don Why don't you just use two facet pumps, parallel, with redundant check valves, and eliminate your troublesome Mukini. Use dual batteries and an essential bus wiring system. When was your last total electrical failure? Does it happen more often than your ruptured diaphragm or pulse line? Flying is not totally without risks. I have more than 1000 582 hours without a Mik pump failure. I rebuilt half way, and I just replaced the Mik pump complete when I installed a new Blue Head. Still flying and relying on a single Mukini pump!! Did have one very unpleasant failure and that was a failed "O" ring in my fuel shut-off valve. At some point we all have to pick our poison and live with the risks...oh yeah , and watch out for the other driver!! :-) Jim > > << likely to be gradual. Also if it is sudden wouldn't we be > likely to be able to turn the tap/valve to the Mikuni pump > off even after the motor flooded and stopped and simply > restart it on the backup pump. I think that the prop would > continue to windmill after the motor ceased firing due to > flooding and continue windmilling after we turned off the > valve/tap so pumping out the flooding. Starting should then > simply mean turning on the backup pump to g >> > > > I have no idea how hard it would be to start a flooded engine > of that sort. > Someone has to go test it. Until it's tested, I have to > assume it would be > impossible. > > Assume the Mik pump fails and you kick in the bypass. If you > don't have the > system plumbed where all inputs/outputs of the Mic are > isolated, that backup > fuel is going to continue to fill the crankcase through the > Mik/pulse line. > There is a check valve in the MIk pump outlet (I was wrong > before) that will > keep the bypass fuel from entering backwards into the pump. > However, the inlet > will still see pressure from the backup pump. Plumbing gets > difficult. The > biggest obstacle is detecting the problem in time to make a > corrective action. > This is an old topic and always gives me a headache. > > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > > > ========= > ========= > Matronics Forums. > ========= > ========= > > > > >


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:54:08 PM PST US
    From: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com>
    Subject: Re: I am pulling the 532 and switching to a 582 oil
    injected eng... --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com> I think 2.5 lbs is the recommended pressure for the Bing carbs on the 582. Jerry Liles Jose M. Toro wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> > >Don: > >I guess 5 pounds is the maximum allowable (don't remember either), but for sure it is within range. If the main pump diaphram fails, the electric pump will keep fuel pressure if it is parallel to the main pump. > >Jose > >AlbertaIV@aol.com wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > >In a message dated 11/17/04 4:40:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, >jose_m_toro@yahoo.com writes: > ><< Don: > >Like Ron, I would not fly without a back-up pump. You get the isolation by >using the pumps in parallel. If one pump fails, you get the same flow through >the other. I turn on the electric fuel pump before starting the engine. The >pressure gauge reads 3 pounds. When the engine starts, it keeps reading 3 >pounds no matter if I keep it on or turn it off. During take off (full power), >pressure increases to 5 pounds >> > >I'm not against back-up pumps. Just pointed out that a back-up pump is no >protection if the main pump's diaphram ruptures. However, as pointed out, the >back-up saved the bacon with clogged filters. BTW, I can't find the specs but >seem to remember that 5 pounds might be too high for the Bing 54????? Bad >memory... > >Don Smythe >N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > > >Jose M. Toro, P.E. >Kitfox II/582 >"A slow flight in the Caribbean..." > > > >


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:29 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=OQiXn+0XhD3xZ0OxkI44UbcVuT6FCNN8KTB7sJ0istrKXBTAfudLk/lnBkBeo4ayBRQKN7Bp8CEt6rj3d6vdj5O3Y8euLKxew3THPyNqWN676lgnBSf7Sz6zOrfY/GANJ1HVXpQv9sFaUzgsN05LMoQIXDM0vSj+PouHs3hC2L8= ;
    From: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Pulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> Rex: What I mean is that the backup pump will take care of providing appropriate fuel pressure to the carbs, but at the same time the mikuni pump with the damaged diaphragm will take care of flooding the crankcase, and will eventually stop the engine. Could be solved by using a valve to close the gas source to the mikuni, but will the engine restart after it got flooded? Jose Rex & Jan Shaw <rexjan@bigpond.com> wrote: --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" Going back to the backup pump theme, it would not work with the Mikuni because of the pulse line, but could be a good alternative for other type of pumps. However, that my friend is another story beyond the scope of the 582ers. Jose, I'm not sure if I follow you correctly. Why do you say the backup pump system won't work with the Mikuni because of the pulse line ? Is it because if the pulse line leaks that we will have some degradation of crankcase pressures ? Rex. rexjan@bigpond.com Jose M. Toro, P.E. Kitfox II/582 "A slow flight in the Caribbean..." ---------------------------------


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:47 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=jfzAgqqMw8ldYCA79PKYkFDtwIDo/L/NVG5XmQE+PJs0Xx267dZ4tGc3cuVMBzJXxg+vb5hC7P0qSrLbxnD/dzw5HIMxhr+ocKvAVRQRUD7NuOobls7pJ99WHe9GDotZ4BjLLYNJlSCvhTBSYGY2wCYc+Xum+1Udj8jkdZjiKd4= ;
    From: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: ruptured impulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> Clem: For the complete installation including the pulse line, I have used automotive fuel injection for many years. Have not failed...so far. Jose shortnaked <shortnaked@golden.net> wrote: --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" someone had it on this plane with a 582 this is what happened. fuel line should not be automotive either use urethane NOT TYGON TYGON will harden ina a year hope this helps you Shorty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clem Nichols" Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Clem Nichols" > > Am I mistaken, or is it OK to use regular automotive fuel line as an impulse > line? > > Clem Nichols > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "shortnaked" > To: > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" > > > > anytime > > > > see i live in a real world and like to try to help out others with facts > > > > pictures prove it > > > > :) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Harris, Robert" > > To: > > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > > > > > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Harris, Robert" > > > >> > >> Thanks for the pics Shorty > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > >> [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of shortnaked > >> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > >> Subject: Kitfox-List: ruptured impulse line > >> > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "shortnaked" > >> > >> Here you go guys a failure of an impulse line i changed the other day. > >> > >> posted on this lazair.com site as it the only way i know how to post a > > pic > >> and share it. > >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=268 > >> Plus if you like LAzair ultralights it full of info adn some MOVIES up > >> to > >> 200 mgs > >> http://lazair.com/forum/index.php?showforum=12 > >> > >> all free too > >> > >> gotta like that lol > >> > >> maybe i should start a kitfox thread there for you guys LOL ( i been > >> sneaking some stuff in already adn no complaints) > >> > >> Shorty > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: > >> To: > >> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Backup for Mikuni pump > >> > >> > >> > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > >> > > >> > << Listers: > >> > > >> > It looks like replacing the mikuni fuel pump annually with a brand new > >> one > >> > solves the backup pump issue. I would add to this to also replace the > >> pulse > >> > line. > >> > > >> > To be honest, it makes sense. Seems extremely unlikely to fail during > >> its > >> > first year, and is cheap enough to be economically feasible. > >> > > >> > You convinced me I made an overkill. This is why I'm an addict to > >> > this > >> > list... > >> > > >> > Jose > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Jose, > >> > It is a privilege to discuss problems with someone like yourself. > > You > >> > don't mind saying, "you might have made a mistake". There are others > > that > >> would > >> > rather die than admit something like that. I like criticism if it's > > kept > >> > nonpersonal. That's what makes us learn. > >> > BTW, I can recall one pump failure (crash landing) that was caused > > by > >> a > >> > ruptured pulse line. As I recall, the pulse line had not been changed > > in > >> a > >> > long/long time. Pilot error the way I see it. > >> > > >> > Don Smythe > >> > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Jose M. Toro, P.E. Kitfox II/582 "A slow flight in the Caribbean..." ---------------------------------


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:17 PM PST US
    From: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com>
    Subject: Re: Fuel gravity flow
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com> Avid did a trial using gravity feed only with a 582 MK IV. The airplane would deliver enough fuel for level cruise flight and, I think, even full throttle level flight but could not keep up with full throttle in climb attitude apparently due to the diminshed head pressure as the distance between the engine and tanks was reduced by the nose up attitude. It is possible using larger diameter feed lines would make a difference. John Larsen was one of the people who did the test using his Avid. I've also been told, but not confirmed, that the Bings supplied have a small diameter float valve orifice for a pump pressure feed system. It could be just opening the orifice a bit would make the difference for gravity feed, might mess it up for a pump though. Jerry Liles AlbertaIV@aol.com wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com > ><< > Well-, we are much back to the basic, the "gravity" system! This might > be the only one, simple enough to work in any case, well, -except for > those aerobatics ... > > You'll Know , the system only delivering fuel - based on the gravity - > is, always the number one, at last, for me. :) >> > > >Torgeir, > If you are talking about "gravity" only (no pumps at all), we tried >that.....If I recall correctly, JR once plumbed his engine up and bypassed the >pulse pump (gravity only). He was able to run the engine at low speed but the >mixture went lean as he advanced the throttle. > It would be nice to come up with a system that relied on gravity only. >No pumps, no pulse line. On the other hand, the backup electric pump proved >worth while on the clogged filter situation. > >Don Smythe >N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 > > >


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:12 PM PST US
    From: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com>
    Subject: Re: Pulse line
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jerry Liles <wliles@bayou.com> If the Mikuni diaphragm ruptures, expect to make a landing without power no matter what you have for backup. You are unlikely to diagnose the problem and shut off the fuel to the Mikuni and start the backup before it is too late. Fiddling around with the extra valves and trying to restart the engine will detract from the real necessity to fly the airplane to a safe landing. My 2cents Jerry Liles Jose M. Toro wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> > >Rex: > >What I mean is that the backup pump will take care of providing appropriate fuel pressure to the carbs, but at the same time the mikuni pump with the damaged diaphragm will take care of flooding the crankcase, and will eventually stop the engine. Could be solved by using a valve to close the gas source to the mikuni, but will the engine restart after it got flooded? > >Jose > >Rex & Jan Shaw <rexjan@bigpond.com> wrote: >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" > >Going back to the backup pump theme, it would not work with the Mikuni >because >of the pulse line, but could be a good alternative for other type of pumps. >However, >that my friend is another story beyond the scope of the 582ers. > >Jose, >I'm not sure if I follow you correctly. Why do you say the backup >pump system won't work with the Mikuni because of the pulse line ? Is it >because if the pulse line leaks that we will have some degradation of >crankcase pressures ? > >Rex. >rexjan@bigpond.com > > >Jose M. Toro, P.E. >Kitfox II/582 >"A slow flight in the Caribbean..." > > >


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:24:13 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=XQAlS+fa0iiBpbiMpfAHg1KOEwGF9K5vzRa4IJbWkDCrDYFdkrgMhNHwlbtVcruO0VpvVYTEc8kb7etOoUOijmJs5xqqhfnE8PTNYjnAfhDObIVDyRN92WSjUi9BJMe0mKALTBdIm/+wEWPiS56WJnlx0L+UEGVLWfnDDSEyxbU= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Check valve
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> > I don't think there is any need to add a check valve > to the Facet as it has one internally. That's one > less plumbing item needed..... Actually it is the failure of the internal check valve that may cause the Facet pump to fail. If this happens, a second parallel pump would only run the fuel in a circle thru the first pump, if you don't have a backup check valve. All it takes is a little debris to clog this valve and the pump will just move fuel back and forth instead if in one direction. The good thing about the Facet - they won't pump into your crankcase if they fail. I liked the suggestion of 2 electric pumps and no diaphram pump with access to the crankcase in the event of failure. I like all my failures to be non-critical. But then are we chasing a problem or a ghost? Because we each have personalized planes, engines and fuel systems, each builder will have to decide in the end what risks to accept. The discussion should make all our decisions a bit better informed, so I am glad to see all the ideas flying about. I didn't marry my fuel system, so it is open to change for the better too. Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:37:32 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=P8zVldShCqlmVcAKDiWmV7zp+6EkO6KWuU2ldKapbRpHiE+XhkFHmUbiEyITtVlou0v6jupvVGFwzf5k3gtiDVCMlXO+qmOpKoTGzCR0YO0qy1uMlCvgR3yV6QZL+j5nekvlJo+nLvIVmOmfqRiGrEdQFmqgMXku0dzFcB8cSvE= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: NSI EA-81 fuel injection
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Spooky? I know what you mean. That honestly is the reason I haven't ventured anywhere near as high as the NSI KF would go. Flight levels are OK with me in a Boeing with a cockpit the size of my study, but in a little KF with a full glass door next to me and the feeling I would only be a bug on a jet's window.... If you still had better than sea level MP at 179,000, and were getting 500'/min, you weren't even normalized. Probably good for another 5-10,000 feet I bet. Good for an EAA record attempt too, but I would want 2 full pressure oxygen systems, FAA approval and a good heater, thermal undies, etc... Even then it would take you a long time to get down in a KF if you needed to. My insecurities are a little too high for doing that stuff. So, spooky - yes. Kurt S. --- Rick <turboflyer@comcast.net> wrote: > You know I don't remember and I was pretty focused > just on flying so I > didn't take notes. I do remember I was still > climbing at 500FPM and was > still above sea level pressure. I just used a simple > O2 bottle with basic > regulator at dialed it up as I went up, kind of > spooky for me and the little > fox. > > Rick __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:06 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=AKGckqZ/9P+Ptl8AVpuwVRED8jQmiV+RB4DfJ+FJcBkgETjF0MjDk0AY1FC9Ex+sTXv2kuEPaMyoa5jvky4yx2bTXyoMy0KHJ7zfLgnW+kp9yBCO6QL27TmyAPC612DBqmjA3NXcyxggBjMhiPr+zh09La2ZxXromVpluLsCjg8= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: EGT probe depth
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Interesting. It was also my understanding that you wanted to read the temp at the center of the flame pattern/exhaust and not the edges. Don, it might be worth it to adjust one side for the middle and compare it to the other side in flight and see what the difference really is. Maybe you are running hot and lean? Or maybe I am not running as hot as I think??? Kurt S. --- AlbertaIV@aol.com wrote: > Bob, > Good to hear from you. How's the bears up your > way? No, the engine did > not use any av-gas. Everything I've looked at calls > for a 1/2 penetration of the probe into the exhaust > manifold and, that almost makes sense. Again, my > biggest question is, what is the temp difference if > you insert the probe 1/4, 1/2 or, all the way to the > back wall???? If the temp difference is small > then, this is not a concern. If the temp difference > is 200 or more degrees then it becomes very > important. > > Don Smythe > N-998DS Classic IV W/ 582 __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:52:08 PM PST US
    DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=LPXxrDHoCVbgmGlI/rxN6T8wQF+bReocCoBvvvyiaETtz834TdfqIWmEbG4MbtuIFVTFVSlx5IjDu+l5xpgdrMAXZEdUObxRWnJHBgHkyhaIVb7DtNleC3f61OS1dId6gIooaC0BnmmFMtvUjC5Y4V4jvcUOxYIePGIYqR/afxU= ;
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: I am pulling the 532...(Kurt).
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Jose, Mine has 2 electric Facet pumps only. Neither is under the seat. The origional NSI design called for only one electric pump. I installed the fuel system per NSI instructions, but added a Facet pump in series at the header tank for the B/U. I also added the F/F meter. It works, is simple and has few connections, but I don't like it yet. I am likely going to change it in the future. It flows like this: - Wing tanks to header. No extra filters or shutoffs. That could change. I've already bought the 3/8th inch lines vice 5/16th. - Header directly to Facet pump for pressure from the low point --- Then under center counsel--- - Fuel shutoff - Fuel filter - F/F sender --- Firewall FWD --- - Facet pump, mostly suction - Gascolator - Carb In flight, you can use the front pump to overcome a small fuel leak (drip) prior to it since it is a suction pump. You can use the rear pump to overcome a small air leak since it is a pressure pump. Key word is small and that is only to get you to the ground powered in case of a little leak. Theoritically... I don't like the pump and gascolator fwd of the firewall. They are below the firewall mount and create a high point at the firewall for trapping air. They are where they can vapor lock, though I have protected them. The gascolator drains within 2 inches of the exhaust outlet. The gascolator may go away and I'll use the header tank as the trap. It has a drain. The front pump could move under the seat to keep it cool. This could make it all up hill from the rear header pump forward to the carb. My fuel filter mount creates another high/low point. Though it is easy to get at now, I'll probably have to move it to get better flow and no trapped air. The problem is that the filter must be mounted vertically to release its trapped air. I haven't decided where to move it to. I am still looking for a good fuel pressure switch. The goal is to turn on the front pump thru the pressure switch. By my design, the rear pump pressure turns off the front pump when its pressure is sufficient and becomes the main pump. When the rear pump fails, the front pump automatically turns on. An LED simply tells you that the front pump is now operating and is your only way of knowing the main pump failed, since the system keeps working and you keep smiling. With the pressure switch added, my design's main failing point is clogging after the header tank. There are no redundant paths. Other than that, it is K-I-S-S. Without the pressure switch, I have to turn on the second pump manually after troubleshooting the problem. Not good close to the ground. I tried using a pressure regulator and leaving both pumps on, but found the regulator could stop all flow if it failed. Mine did. If I can't find an adequate pressure switch, I can run both pumps continuously at lower pressure and just have 50% pressure if one fails. Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo --- "Jose M. Toro" <jose_m_toro@yahoo.com> wrote: > Kurt: > > I'm done with the backup pump issue for Mikuni pumps > and 582s...it won't solve the pulse line issue. > However, I will be shortly switching to a Jabiru > engine, and most likely will use a backup pump in > that implementation. > > Your Subaru engine installation is closer to the > Jabiru installion than the 582 installation I > currently have. > > I would like to learn a little bit more about your > dual pump approach. What kind of fuel pump is the > main in your installation. Are your electric pumps, > after the header tank, under the seat like Peter > G's? > > Jose __________________________________ http://my.yahoo.com




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --