Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:15 AM - Re: Aluminum cowl? (kurt schrader)
     2. 02:00 AM - Re: Pony Express? (kurt schrader)
     3. 04:39 AM - Re: My EGTs (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
     4. 06:51 AM - Re: Pony Express? (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
     5. 06:53 AM - Re: My EGTs (David Savener)
     6. 06:56 AM - Re: My EGTs (David Savener)
     7. 12:08 PM - Re: UMA Tachoometers? (Michel Verheughe)
     8. 12:31 PM - Re: My EGTs (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
     9. 02:53 PM - Leaking seal (Rex & Jan Shaw)
    10. 03:53 PM - Re: Leaking seal (kirk hull)
    11. 04:53 PM - Re: My EGTs (John Perry)
    12. 05:21 PM - Re: My EGTs (Torgeir Mortensen)
    13. 05:29 PM - Re: My EGTs (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
    14. 05:50 PM - Re: My EGTs (David Savener)
    15. 05:54 PM - Re: My EGTs (Glenn Horne)
    16. 05:58 PM - Re: My EGTs (John Perry)
    17. 06:18 PM - West Epoxy System Warning (AlbertaIV@aol.com)
    18. 07:40 PM - System Warning (hausding, sid)
    19. 08:09 PM - Re: West Epoxy System Warning (Don Pearsall)
    20. 08:49 PM - Re: My EGTs (aerocon1@telusplanet.net)
    21. 08:51 PM - Re: West Epoxy System Warning (John Perry)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Aluminum cowl? | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Hi Michel,
      
      Aluminum is a bit harder than copper, so you may need
      a harder mold to pound on.  A rubber hammer worked
      pretty well for me.  An English well, as suggested, is
      great but requires money or access and practice.  They
      make very nice parts.
      
      I used wood molds for my somewhat limited parts
      creations.  They require a bit of effort, but make a
      nice result in the end.
      
      Have fun.  Alumimun is neat to work with after a bit. 
      About as easy as wood, just different.
      
      Kurt S.
      
      --- Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> wrote:
      > 
      > Ok, then I'll try to make some experiments with
      > aluminium, Kurt. Ages ago, when
      > I was a student, I worked brass and copper, using a
      > cushion made of thick
      > leather and filled with sand. I would then put the
      > metal part on it, and shape
      > it with a round hammer. I have leather and I can
      > find sand ... on a beach! :-)
      > As for the aluminium, there is a guy, not far from
      > where I live, who is the
      > Norwegian agent for Sonex. He has all the
      > aviation-grade aluminium I need, I
      > should think.
      > 
      > Cheers,
      > Michel
      > 
      > do not archive
      
      
                      
      __________________________________ 
      http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re:  Pony Express? | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Wish I could set it up right now with you all, but I
      have to do a house insection in FL on Sat and closing
      on the 24th.  Won't be back until after Easter.  So
      you all can volunteer first if you want.  It would be
      an excust to fly for a purpose.
      
      We've got Fla to Mi and Texas to Maine with maybe S&F
      in there somewhere?  Lots of opportunities to do it
      right to start.  :-)
      
      Kurt S.
      
      --- jareds <jareds@verizon.net> wrote:
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: jareds
      > <jareds@verizon.net>
      > 
      > GREAT IDEA KURT!!
      > I would think all able would be willing to
      > participate in that parade!
      > 
      > kurt schrader wrote:
      > 
      > >--> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader
      > <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      > >
      > >There are times like this when I wish we could do a
      > >"pony express" with our cross country friends.  You
      > >know, one KF flys with him until the next picks him
      > up
      > >and so on until he gets home.  We could each pick
      > him
      > >up inbound to our home airport and fly outbound
      > with
      > >him a bit after fueling or overnighting.  Kind of a
      > >buddy system with friendship and safety perks.
      > >
      > >Just an idea.  There are Fox's most everywhere and
      > I
      > >kind'a like the safety idea.
      > >
      > >Kurt S.
      > >
      > >--- Clifford Dow <cdowjr@yahoo.com> wrote:
      > >
      > >>Well Dam I didn't hear many arguements for not
      > >>buying a Kitfox - so I bought one!!  
      > >>That video is awesome!!   I don't plan on flying
      > >>like that but it sure is nice knowing it can take
      > >>the G forces!  
      > >>With a little luck I will pick it up in Texas and
      > >>fly it to Sun'N Fun - are there any kitfox owners
      > >>planning to fly their kitfox by Fortworth, TX and
      > >>onto Sun'N Fun around April 8th-12th?
      > >>Again, with a little luck I will fly from sun"n
      > Fun
      > >>to Maine - are there any Kitfox owners flying that
      > >>way after sun'n fun?? It's a huge adventure for
      > this
      > >>250 TT pilot!  Following another Kitfox might make
      > >>it easier for me to enjoy the view.  
      > >>My initials are CD - I wanted a number with
      > Charlie
      > >>Delta on the end - Cirrus Design went and reserved
      > >>just about everyone of them!!  from 111CD to 999CD
      > -
      > >>that's alot of numbers!!  If you have a unique
      > >>number you want - reserve it now!   
      > >>Thanks
      > >>cliff in Maine.
      
      
                      
      __________________________________ 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      
      In a message dated 3/17/2005 2:29:19 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
      david_savener@msn.com writes:
      
      
      How  do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard of that 
       possibility before.
      
      The rubber carb sockets are tight.  They look  new with no cracks, etc.
      
      
      I think it was Bob Robertson that gave me a method to check for engine case  
      leaks.  While the engine is running, spray starting fluid around the engine  
      openings.  If you get a rev up when spraying in a certain area, that would  
      indicate a case leak.  Back when I was having problems, I tried that and  had no
      
      rev ups.  Of course, my problems was something other than a case  leak.
      
      Maybe Bob could jump in here and make sure I didn't say something  wrong.
      
      You have lots of good advice especially about swapping the EGT probes  
      around.  Also, make sure the probes are installed at the same depth  into the 
      manifold.
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re:  Pony Express? | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      
      <<Wish I could set it up right now with you all, but I
      have to  do a house insection in FL on Sat and closing
      on the 24th.  Won't be  back until after Easter.  So
      you all can volunteer first if you  want.  It would be
      an excust to fly for a purpose.
      Kurt  S.>>
      
      
      Kurt,
      Where you gonna be.  I'm leaving for Orlando on Thurs the  24th.  Be there in 
      the late afternoon/early evening.
      
      Don Smythe
      Do Not Archive
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:47:00 -0600
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "David Savener" <david_savener@msn.com>
      
      I tried changing the egt probes and the problem showed up on the other needle,
      telling me that I did have a hot back cylinder egt.
      
      I rebuilt the fuel Mikuni pulse pump during the engine change.  I also installed
      an electric Facet pump with a fuel pressure regulator after the Facet pump and
      before the Mikuni.  The problem continues with the electric pump on.
      
      I have the fuel pressure guage set at 3.25 lbs.  Maybe I should plumb in a fuel
      pressure guage.  If I do, What pressure is best?  What pressure made your problem
      to away? 
      
      Is it OK to have a bigger(higher number) main jet in the rear carb or should they
      always be the same in each?
      
      One more question.  My idle speed varies.  It will run 2150 and then drop down
      to 1700 and back again.  I suspect that my carb adjustments are off.  Has anyone
      used the COLORTUNE tool for adjusting carbs?  That's the one for sale in the
      Bing Aircraft Carb Tuning and Parts Manual!
      
      Dave S
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: John Perry<mailto:eskflyer@pld.com>
        To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>
        Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 11:11 PM
        Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      
        --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Perry" <eskflyer@pld.com<mailto:eskflyer@pld.com>>
      
         OK now we are getting somewhere . take the egt probes out of the manifold
        and switch places with them and see if the front one runs hotter . Also do
        you have the old style hole in manifold or new style thread in hole manifold
         If old style then maybe holes not exact distances from edge of piston on
        both . there are many things that can cause this but none as frustrating as
        a simple bad probe so try changing them around and let us know what you find
        out .
         I once had trouble getting another engine  to good egt and it turned out to
        be a bad fuel pump also . I bought a cheep fuel pressure gauge from auto
        store and plumbed in and was loosing pressure at 5600 rpm and up . rebuilt
        pump and all probs went away .
        Have fun fly safe fly low fly slow .
        John Perry
      
        -------Original Message-------
      
        From: David Savener
        Date: 03/16/05 22:27:09
        To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>
        Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
        --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "David Savener" <david_savener@msn.com<mailto:david_savener@msn.com>>
      
        I put a 158 main jet in the front carb and a 165 main jet in the rear carb.
        When I flew it at 50 degrees F, I still get 50 degrees hotter EGT on the
        back cylinder.  I get right at 6800 RPM at full throttle in level flight
        which makes me think I have the prop pitched about right.
      
        I thought that bigger jet in the rear carb would even out the EGTs but no
        luck.  I already had the needle clips on the bottom groove.
      
        Maybe I need to rejet the mid-range.  I'll check the float level again, but
        it appears to be correct.
      
      
        How do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard of that
        possibility before.
      
        The rubber carb sockets are tight.  They look new with no cracks, etc.
      
        This engine sat for a long time.  Maybe there is something else I am
        missing!!
      
        Dave S
          ----- Original Message -----
          From: John Perry<mailto:eskflyer@pld.com<mailto:eskflyer@pld.com>>
          To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>>
          Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:16 PM
          Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:53:52 -0600
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "David Savener" <david_savener@msn.com>
      
      I'll try that same depth of probe suggestion.  If memory serves, one of my probes
      does go in further.
      
      I sure hope something works.
      
      Thanks
      Dave S
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
        To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>
        Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:36 AM
        Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      
        --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
      
      
        In a message dated 3/17/2005 2:29:19 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
        david_savener@msn.com<mailto:david_savener@msn.com> writes:
      
      
        How  do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard of that
         possibility before.
      
        The rubber carb sockets are tight.  They look  new with no cracks, etc.
      
      
        I think it was Bob Robertson that gave me a method to check for engine case 
        leaks.  While the engine is running, spray starting fluid around the engine 
        openings.  If you get a rev up when spraying in a certain area, that would 
        indicate a case leak.  Back when I was having problems, I tried that and  had
      no
        rev ups.  Of course, my problems was something other than a case  leak.
      
        Maybe Bob could jump in here and make sure I didn't say something  wrong.
      
        You have lots of good advice especially about swapping the EGT probes  
        around.  Also, make sure the probes are installed at the same depth  into the
        manifold.
      
        Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: UMA Tachoometers? | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
      
      Steve Cooper wrote: 
      > I've read recently that the UMA Tachometer is a pretty good instrument. Does
      > anyone have any experience with these?
      
      Er ... where am I now? Oh yes, on the Kitfox list! :-) Sorry, I just answered a
      question about the UMA tacho on ... the Jabiru list, if I remember correctly.
      (You know, old age and short memory! :-)
      
      Well, Steve, I had my Jabiru delivered with the standard VDO 3" tacho. But I
      didn't wanted to make a new hole in my panel so I traded it for a 2 1/4" UMA
      tacho with the four screws that fit nicely the holes from the Rotax
      instruments. I wired it to earth, 12 V and to one of the alternator's wires. It
      works like a charm, looks very "aviation-like" and feels solid. After 8 hours,
      it is still working ... unlike some of the crap cell phones you can buy today!
      Grrrr! :-)
      
      Cheers,
      Michel
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      
      In a message dated 3/17/2005 2:26:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
      david_savener@msn.com writes:
      
      
      I'll  try that same depth of probe suggestion.  If memory serves, one of my  
      probes does go in further.
      
      I sure hope something  works.
      
      
      I would like to know if you see a difference.  A few weeks ago, I was  
      looking at one of the 2 stroke helicopters here and noticed the EGT probes were
      
      fully inserted into the manifold all the way to the other side.  From my  memory,
      
      the tips of the probes should fall in the center of the exhaust  path.  I 
      just wonder what actual temp differences you might find with  different probe 
      depths.  I tried to change mine as a test but, they were  frozen in place around
      
      the nut/ferrel.  Didnt' want to break something just  for a test.
          Just as a guess, I'd think the probe nearest the center  of the exhaust 
      path would be the hottest??
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
      
      How do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard of that
      possibility
      before.
      
      David,
                 I played with 2 stroke Kart engines for many years. Admittedly
      they were smaller and easy to handle but what we did was to make up blanking
      plates and gaskets for the intake and exhaust ports. In one of them have a
      valve out of a car tyre. Make sure your spark plug is correctly installed.
      Through the valve pressurise the motor to 5 to 10 lbs and we used to then
      dunk it in a trough of water. Any bubbles will indicate a leak, just watch
      where they come from. Now a 582 is a bit bigger and heavier so perhaps you
      can just spray around suspect leak areas like the main seal with a soapy
      solution of dishwasher liquid and water. Don't foget using this method
      though to check gaskets as well. It is helpfull especially if it is leaking
      to feed the valve with 5 to 10 lbs pressure all the time you are checking as
      otherwise the leak might drain your pressure off too quickly.
                   Rex.
      rexjan@bigpond.com
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "kirk hull" <kirkhull@sbcglobal.net>
      
      As an A&P I would never consider dunking any engine in water
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rex & Jan
      Shaw
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Leaking seal
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Rex & Jan Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
      
      How do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard of that
      possibility
      before.
      
      David,
                 I played with 2 stroke Kart engines for many years. Admittedly
      they were smaller and easy to handle but what we did was to make up blanking
      plates and gaskets for the intake and exhaust ports. In one of them have a
      valve out of a car tyre. Make sure your spark plug is correctly installed.
      Through the valve pressurise the motor to 5 to 10 lbs and we used to then
      dunk it in a trough of water. Any bubbles will indicate a leak, just watch
      where they come from. Now a 582 is a bit bigger and heavier so perhaps you
      can just spray around suspect leak areas like the main seal with a soapy
      solution of dishwasher liquid and water. Don't foget using this method
      though to check gaskets as well. It is helpfull especially if it is leaking
      to feed the valve with 5 to 10 lbs pressure all the time you are checking as
      otherwise the leak might drain your pressure off too quickly.
                   Rex.
      rexjan@bigpond.com
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Perry" <eskflyer@pld.com>
      
      David to check the rear seal you have to dismantel the engine and remove the
      magneto and electronics so if you do go this far just have new seals put in
       How old is the engine and how long has it been sitting ?.
      do not try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while it
      is running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and cdi
      unit . 
      
      John Perry
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Torgeir Mortensen <torgemor@online.no>
      
      Hi David,
      
      You've really got some problem here.
      
      If the probe adjustment cure it, the EGT difference, thats fine.
      
      In case this would not help, try to swap the carbs - just to see that the 
      aft. cyl still is high. I'll don't think the fluctuating RPM is a very 
      good indication, -at that low idle..
      
      Well, just found the "troubleshooting guide" at "Leadingedge-Airfoils" web 
      site, there is a step by step procedure for the kind of symptom you 
      describe.
      
      Here's the direct link:
      
      http://www.leadingedge-airfoils.com/pdf/TROUBLE.pdf
      
      Here is the general tech-help page direct link:
      
      http://www.leadingedge-airfoils.com/techhelp.htm
      
      I took some pictures of my "spare" manifold with the probes installed, 
      here you can see how deep the probes go when installed into the manifold 
      (in the one I have).
      
      Hmm, there is a service bulletin, or maybe a service letter - about new 
      installation of engines and related problem. They warn about rubber 
      remains from the insert of the fuel lines/fittings. They show how small 
      particles can block/reduce fuel flow. Also remember when my friends 
      completed an installation of a 912S-. They got a small rubber peace into 
      the carb - blocked the "closing" of the float valve and had lots of 
      problem with overflow, to rich etc.
      
      If your aft. carb is a little lean in the middle - it sure can happened 
      due to a partly blockage.
      
      However, try to swap those "main" component, also change the spark plugs - 
      lot's of problem's can be related to spark plugs. We've seen this several 
      times on this list..
      
      Well, just try to "sort" out a little more before going to deep, isn't 
      this a "brand new engine"?
      
      
      All pictures is high res.
      
      This first one show the probe tip.
      
      http://kitfox.net/images/DSC02606.JPG
      
      Here is the from the outside viewing the probe seating.
      
      http://kitfox.net/images/DSC02607.JPG
      
      This is just an overview.
      
      http://kitfox.net/images/DSC02609.JPG
      
      Good luck.
      
      
      Torgeir
      
      
      On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:53:52 -0600, David Savener <david_savener@msn.com> 
      wrote:
      
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "David Savener" 
      > <david_savener@msn.com>
      >
      > I'll try that same depth of probe suggestion.  If memory serves, one of 
      > my probes does go in further.
      >
      > I sure hope something works.
      >
      > Thanks
      > Dave S
      >   ----- Original Message -----
      >   From: AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
      >   To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>
      >   Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:36 AM
      >   Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      >
      >
      >   --> Kitfox-List message posted by: 
      > AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
      >
      >
      >   In a message dated 3/17/2005 2:29:19 AM Eastern Standard Time,
      >   david_savener@msn.com<mailto:david_savener@msn.com> writes:
      >
      >
      >   How  do I check to see if the rear seal is leaking??  I haven't heard 
      > of that
      >    possibility before.
      >
      >   The rubber carb sockets are tight.  They look  new with no cracks, etc.
      >
      >
      >   I think it was Bob Robertson that gave me a method to check for engine 
      > case
      >   leaks.  While the engine is running, spray starting fluid around the 
      > engine
      >   openings.  If you get a rev up when spraying in a certain area, that 
      > would
      >   indicate a case leak.  Back when I was having problems, I tried that 
      > and  had no
      >   rev ups.  Of course, my problems was something other than a case  leak.
      >
      >   Maybe Bob could jump in here and make sure I didn't say something  
      > wrong.
      >
      >   You have lots of good advice especially about swapping the EGT probes
      >   around.  Also, make sure the probes are installed at the same depth  
      > into the
      >   manifold.
      >
      >   Don Smythe
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      
      In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:53:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
      eskflyer@pld.com writes:
      
      do not  try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while it
      is  running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and  cdi
      unit . 
      
      John Perry
      
      
      I did not mean to imply spraying any liquid "into" the  rear part of the 
      engine or any other part of the engine.  The test I was  referring to simply will
      
      enrich the air around the engine with a more  combustible material.  Any 
      suction of the engine due to a leak should pull  this enriched air into the case
      
      and cause an increase of RPM.   The  spray should not be directed into an 
      opening of the engine in a concentrated  form but, sprayed in the area so it will
      
      mix with the surronding air.
          On the other hand, forget it.  It's probably a dumb  a_ _ idea anyway. 
      
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:46:09 -0600
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "David Savener" <david_savener@msn.com>
      
      We used to use the spray method to look for intake leaks many years ago when I
      had an auto repair shop.
      
      It is a useful tool, used correctly.  Once I found a new young mehanic spraying
      gasoline under the hood of my old jeep.  I screamed at him for being so foolish
      just as he pulled out a vacuum hose with a crack in it.   Geeezzz!!
      
      I will check out my egt probes tonight, run it tomorrow, then try switching the
      carbs.
      
      The trouble shooting guide looks promising too.  I had forgotten about that.
      
      Thanks for all the help and ideas.  This is a great list!!!!!
      
      Dave S
      do not archive
        ----- Original Message -----
        From: AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
        To: kitfox-list@matronics.com<mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>
        Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:29 PM
        Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      
        --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com<mailto:AlbertaIV@aol.com>
      
      
        In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:53:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
        eskflyer@pld.com<mailto:eskflyer@pld.com> writes:
      
        do not  try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while it
        is  running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and  cdi
        unit .
      
        John Perry
      
      
        I did not mean to imply spraying any liquid "into" the  rear part of the
        engine or any other part of the engine.  The test I was  referring to simply
      will
        enrich the air around the engine with a more  combustible material.  Any
        suction of the engine due to a leak should pull  this enriched air into the case
        and cause an increase of RPM.   The  spray should not be directed into an
        opening of the engine in a concentrated  form but, sprayed in the area so it
      will
        mix with the surronding air.
            On the other hand, forget it.  It's probably a dumb  a_ _ idea anyway.
      
      
        Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Glenn Horne" <glennflys@verizon.net>
      
      It probably is Don.
      Glenn
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: <AlbertaIV@aol.com>
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      >
      >
      > In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:53:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
      > eskflyer@pld.com writes:
      >
      > do not  try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while 
      > it
      > is  running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and 
      > cdi
      > unit .
      >
      > John Perry
      >
      >
      > I did not mean to imply spraying any liquid "into" the  rear part of the
      > engine or any other part of the engine.  The test I was  referring to 
      > simply will
      > enrich the air around the engine with a more  combustible material.  Any
      > suction of the engine due to a leak should pull  this enriched air into 
      > the case
      > and cause an increase of RPM.   The  spray should not be directed into an
      > opening of the engine in a concentrated  form but, sprayed in the area so 
      > it will
      > mix with the surronding air.
      >    On the other hand, forget it.  It's probably a dumb  a_ _ idea anyway.
      >
      >
      > Don Smythe
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Perry" <eskflyer@pld.com>
      
      No Don its not a dumb idea it works great on the pto end but very hard to
      get to the mag end . I have done this test on snowmachines but would rather
      not do this to my flying engine lol . If i think its leaking just tear down
      and put new gaskets and seals every 150 hours , or 5 years which ever comes
      first .  
      
      Fly safe fly low fly slow 
      John In sw wind blowin no water flatland KS.
      kitfox 2 N718PD
      -------Original Message-------
      
      From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      
      In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:53:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
      eskflyer@pld.com writes:
      
      do not  try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while it
      is  running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and  cdi
      unit .
      
      John Perry
      
      
      I did not mean to imply spraying any liquid "into" the  rear part of the
      engine or any other part of the engine.  The test I was  referring to simply
      will
      enrich the air around the engine with a more  combustible material.  Any
      suction of the engine due to a leak should pull  this enriched air into the
      case
      and cause an increase of RPM.   The  spray should not be directed into an
      opening of the engine in a concentrated  form but, sprayed in the area so it
      will
      mix with the surronding air.
          On the other hand, forget it.  It's probably a dumb  a_ _ idea anyway
      
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | West Epoxy System Warning | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      I posted a few days back that I had another episode with  West Epoxy.  Once a 
      person becomes sensitized to epoxy, it is for life  (that is per West Epoxy). 
       A couple weeks ago, my Son wanted to fill a  small crack on his boat and I 
      offered to help.   He mixed it up while  I watched close by.  Even that close 
      and it nailed me good.  I have  lost at least two layers of skin around my nose
      
      and mouth.  Tonight, it had  stopped peeling and starting to itch.  I gently 
      rubbed my face to make it  feel better and all of a sudden, I had two palmfuls
      
      of blood.  There isn't  enough skin left on my face to hold back the blood.
          We've talked about MEK and other chemical we use and how  bad they can be 
      to an airplane builder.  Trust me folks, you don't  want to become sensitized 
      to epoxy.  West says that it will get worse and  worse at each exposure.  
      They are telling the truth.
          When you use this stuff, you better get into full dress  with an external 
      air source.  I'm having a hard time understanding how they  can even sell 
      this stuff.
          BTW, I've used West Epoxy rarely on and off  for years and it never 
      bothered me until I built the Fox.  I put out this  warning tonight because, quite
      
      frankly, I'm a bit worried this time.  All  you tough guys that might say, 
      "stuff don't bother me".  STAND-BY
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "hausding, sid" <sidh@charter.net>
      
      Don, 
      What happens after sex?
      Sid
      --------------------
      
      
      I posted a few days back that I had another episode with  West Epoxy.  Once
      a
      person becomes sensitized to epoxy, it is for life  (that is per West Epoxy)
      
        A couple weeks ago, my Son wanted to fill a  small crack on his boat and I
      offered to help.   He mixed it up while  I watched close by.  Even that
      close
      and it nailed me good.  I have  lost at least two layers of skin around my
      nose
      and mouth.  Tonight, it had  stopped peeling and starting to itch.  I gently
      rubbed my face to make it  feel better and all of a sudden, I had two
      palmfuls
      of blood.  There isn't  enough skin left on my face to hold back the blood.
          We've talked about MEK and other chemical we use and how  bad they can
      be
      to an airplane builder.  Trust me folks, you don't  want to become
      sensitized
      to epoxy.  West says that it will get worse and  worse at each exposure.
      They are telling the truth.
          When you use this stuff, you better get into full dress  with an
      external
      air source.  I'm having a hard time understanding how they  can even sell
      this stuff.
          BTW, I've used West Epoxy rarely on and off  for years and it never
      bothered me until I built the Fox.  I put out this  warning tonight because,
      quite
      frankly, I'm a bit worried this time.  All  you tough guys that might say,
      "stuff don't bother me".  STAND-BY
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | West Epoxy System Warning | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Don Pearsall" <donpearsall@comcast.net>
      
      Don, I have to echo your warnings to everyone. I built a KR-1 over 28 years
      ago, then a KR-2. Both are built using epoxy as the resin for fiberglass
      cloth (more flexible than polyester.) During construction, I did not wear
      gloves at all, and often had my hands and arms dripping with the stuff. It
      even got into my hair. I sensitized my hands after the KR-1. Every time I
      was exposed to the epoxy, or even its fumes, it was like someone poured
      scalding water over my skin. My skin would just act exactly like it was
      badly burned, and hurt as bad too. Luckily, the sensitized areas were just
      my hands and arms, but not ALL areas. There were patches of my skin that
      were not affected. 
      
      Needless to say, after the KR-2, I said bye-bye to building composite
      planes.
      
      To this day, many years later, I still get burned by just being near epoxy
      fumes. And I sure do not work with it.
      
      So I sympathize with you Don! I hope your face heals quickly. Did you go to
      a Dr yet? Maybe there is something they can do to make it heal faster.
      
      Don Pearsall
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      AlbertaIV@aol.com
      Subject: Kitfox-List: West Epoxy System Warning
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      
      I posted a few days back that I had another episode with  West Epoxy.  Once
      a 
      person becomes sensitized to epoxy, it is for life  (that is per West
      Epoxy). 
       A couple weeks ago, my Son wanted to fill a  small crack on his boat and I 
      offered to help.   He mixed it up while  I watched close by.  Even that
      close 
      and it nailed me good.  I have  lost at least two layers of skin around my
      nose 
      and mouth.  Tonight, it had  stopped peeling and starting to itch.  I gently
      
      rubbed my face to make it  feel better and all of a sudden, I had two
      palmfuls 
      of blood.  There isn't  enough skin left on my face to hold back the blood.
          We've talked about MEK and other chemical we use and how  bad they can
      be 
      to an airplane builder.  Trust me folks, you don't  want to become
      sensitized 
      to epoxy.  West says that it will get worse and  worse at each exposure.  
      They are telling the truth.
          When you use this stuff, you better get into full dress  with an
      external 
      air source.  I'm having a hard time understanding how they  can even sell 
      this stuff.
          BTW, I've used West Epoxy rarely on and off  for years and it never 
      bothered me until I built the Fox.  I put out this  warning tonight because,
      quite 
      frankly, I'm a bit worried this time.  All  you tough guys that might say, 
      "stuff don't bother me".  STAND-BY
      
      Don Smythe
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: aerocon1@telusplanet.net
      
      Hi All,
      I know I'm coming in on the end of this thread re the seal leak.  The correct 
      method for testing the crankcase integrity is to blank off the intakes and 
      exhaust plus the sparkplug holes and the impulse port.  
      We machined up fittings that slip into the rubber intake sockets and made up 
      blanking plates from 1/2 in. aluminium for the exhaust ports (use rubber 
      gasket 
      material between the plate and the block).  Just use a piece of blocked off 
      fuel line for the impulse port.
      On one of the fittings in the intake sockets we put in a fitting that we could
      
      hook up a pressure/vacuum pump.  We use a simple hand held unit that has a 
      vacuum/pressure gauge attached.
      You need to pressure the crankcase up to 6 lbs and it has to hold for 5 min.
      You will also need to vacuum test to 5 lbs and have it hold for 3 minutes.
      If it does this you should be just fine.
      IF on the pressure test you get a bleed down we use a simple solution of soapy
      
      water and a paint brush to coat any area we expect air could escape.
      
      I'm not sure who suggested this, but if the engine is over 5 years old or has 
      more than 150 hours it would be a good idea to re-seal it regardless.  This 
      would also give you a chance to check out the cranksaft bearings and the 
      condition on the cross shaft.  This is not an expensive endevour if you are 
      doing it yourself.  On a 582 it would take close to 10 hours to break the 
      engine down and return it to service. Add anohter 1.5 hours if you decide to 
      give the gear drive a going over.
      
      If the engine is still in the airframe and you have a well ventilated area 
      (that means outdoors with ALL the cowlings off the engine) you can check the
      crankcase halves and intake sockets for cracks by runnung the engine at an 
      idle and taking a small butane torch (unlit of course)and playing the nozzle 
      around the area the case halves join and around the intake sockets.  You can't
      
      test your mag end seal as it's not a good idea to fill the stator cavity with 
      butane (especially with the engine running) and you can't get at the front 
      seal because of the gear drive.
      
      Just my two cents
      
      Bob Robertson
      Light Engine Services Ltd.
      Rotax Service Center.
      
      
      Quoting John Perry <eskflyer@pld.com>:
      
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Perry" <eskflyer@pld.com>
      > 
      > No Don its not a dumb idea it works great on the pto end but very hard to
      > get to the mag end . I have done this test on snowmachines but would rather
      > not do this to my flying engine lol . If i think its leaking just tear down
      > and put new gaskets and seals every 150 hours , or 5 years which ever comes
      > first .  
      > 
      > Fly safe fly low fly slow 
      > John In sw wind blowin no water flatland KS.
      > kitfox 2 N718PD
      > -------Original Message-------
      > 
      > From: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      > Date: 03/17/05 19:16:23
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: My EGTs
      
      > 
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: AlbertaIV@aol.com
      > 
      > 
      > In a message dated 3/17/2005 7:53:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
      > eskflyer@pld.com writes:
      > 
      > do not  try spraying any form of liquid into the rear of the engine while it
      > is  running to check for leaks you can kill your  electrical system and  cdi
      > unit .
      > 
      > John Perry
      > 
      > 
      > I did not mean to imply spraying any liquid "into" the  rear part of the
      > engine or any other part of the engine.  The test I was  referring to simply
      > will
      > enrich the air around the engine with a more  combustible material.  Any
      > suction of the engine due to a leak should pull  this enriched air into the
      > case
      > and cause an increase of RPM.   The  spray should not be directed into an
      > opening of the engine in a concentrated  form but, sprayed in the area so it
      > will
      > mix with the surronding air.
      >     On the other hand, forget it.  It's probably a dumb  a_ _ idea anyway
      > 
      > 
      > Don Smythe
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
      
      
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: West Epoxy System Warning | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Perry" <eskflyer@pld.com>
      
      Don i feel for you buddy. I hope all goes well with your health . I to have
      problems stemming from my child hod days of helping dad build boats and
      airplanes . Big ones that is . we used many 55 gallon drums of polyester and
      epoxy over the years and did not use resperators or any type of skin
      protection . I am paying for it now . When i use any at all I put on
      resperator and long sleeve shirt and use latex gloves or rubber ones . so
      far this has worked i hope i never get where you are . Mabe this will help
      someone else to heed the warnings and save there health in the future. 
      
      Be safe fly slow fly low 
      John Perry
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |