Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:51 AM - Re: Engine quitting (Fox5flyer)
     2. 06:45 AM - Re: small file Blank series V weight and balance  (Randy Daughenbaugh)
     3. 07:42 AM - "Easy-Lift" Amphibious Floats (Barry)
     4. 07:55 AM - Re: Door Struts (Noel Loveys)
     5. 08:45 AM - Re: Engine quitting (wingsdown)
     6. 09:21 AM -  KITFOX PARTS AND OTHER AIRCRAFT PARTS FOR SALE UPDATE: (wingsdown)
     7. 09:36 AM - Re: Engine quitting (AMuller589@aol.com)
     8. 09:52 AM - Re: Engine quitting (AMuller589@aol.com)
     9. 02:02 PM - Little help with windshield please. (Dave G.)
    10. 02:31 PM - Re: Engine quitting (Jim Crowder)
    11. 02:38 PM - Ethanol and wing tanks (Michel Verheughe)
    12. 04:28 PM - Re: Little help with windshield please. (Jimmie Blackwell)
    13. 04:46 PM - Re: small file Blank series V weight and balance  (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    14. 06:14 PM - Re: Little help with windshield please. (Dave and Diane)
    15. 06:35 PM - Re: Little help with windshield please. (Dave G.)
    16. 07:54 PM - Re: Ethanol and wing tanks (Lowell Fitt)
    17. 09:19 PM - Re: Little help with windshield please. (kurt schrader)
    18. 09:44 PM - Re: Engine quitting (kurt schrader)
    19. 09:55 PM - Re: Engine quitting (kurt schrader)
    20. 10:26 PM - Re: Engine quitting (Jim Crowder)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      MessageAll of that might be true for the turbo, but not for the normally 
      aspirated.
      Deke
      
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: wingsdown 
        To: kitfox-list@matronics.com 
        Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 9:37 PM
        Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      
      
        !200 too 1400 RPMs is fine. 1350 is what I remember as recommended. 
      Any more and you run the risk of floating off the end of the strip. What 
      you have to rethink with the Sub is running lean. You cannot go full 
      rich on landings, just cant, especially if you do that cross or down 
      wind.  Just lean her out for the power sitting you have. Remember if you 
      have a go around you need to  do two things instead of one,  full rich  
      full power. Yea, yea you shouldn't have to do that, OK well then you 
      need a different engine or fuel management system. Even on the ground if 
      you don't lean so that a quick push on the ego stick causes her to 
      stumble or quite she is to fat and nobody likes a fat lady, with few 
      exceptions :).  So for the NSI/Subaru folks that's just the way it is if 
      you run the TBI. Might want to do the idel adjustment on a hot engine.
      
        Rick
          -----Original Message-----
          From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com 
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of QSS
          Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 1:20 AM
          To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
          Subject: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      
      
          Hi Guys, I am having problems with the idle on my subaru and have 
      twice now had to do a dead stick landing when pulling power on final. 
      Has anyone with an Ellison TBI had a similar experience. Im running on 
      1200-1400 at idle and when on the ground and warming the engine up it 
      runs fine but after flying for an hour or so she begins running rough at 
      low revs and will quit on me if im not careful when I pull power.
      
          Regards
          Graeme 
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | small file Blank series V weight and balance  | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Randy  Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com>
      
      Kurt,
      That slot, cut by Skystar, was what got me looking at it again.  My trim was
      not going all the way to the bottom of the slot.  Now it does.
      
      I thought that slot was awful big when I was building.  But now I am using
      all the slot!  Hopefully I am the only one to make this mistake.
      
      Randy
      
      .           
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of kurt schrader
      Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 10:50 PM
      Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: small file Blank series V weight and balance 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader
      <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Hi Randy,
      
      I am trying to remember from construction.  Was the
      slot in the access panel for the stab leading edge
      already cut?  Did yours go to the bottom of the slot
      origionally and you cut more out, or did you already
      have more room?  I am just trying to figure an easy
      point of comparison.....
      
      Kurt S.
      
      --- Randy  Daughenbaugh <rjdaugh@rapidnet.com> wrote:
      
      > I should pass on something I found to give more tail
      > down authority.
      > 
      > When I built my plane I wasn't sure where the
      > adjustment should be on the
      > trim screw jack.  So I put it about mid point.  
      > During a recent condition
      > inspection, I got curious and found that I was not
      > getting the leading edge
      > of the horizontal stabilizer down as far as I could.
      >  So I moved the
      > connection on the screw jack to a low as I could get
      > it.  
      > 
      > This gives me much more tail down authority.  I can
      > put the tail wheel down
      > first even with full flaps.  I have only tried
      > dumping flaps a couple of
      > times.  It works well, but I feel I am busy enough
      > on landing without adding another task.  ;-)
      > 
      > Randy  Series 5/7
      
      __________________________________________________
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | "Easy-Lift" Amphibious Floats | 
      
      A friend is installing "Easy-Lift" 1050 Amphib Floats on a Model III.
      
      The Canadian Co went out of business around 1992 and before the
      
      entire kit was Shipped.
      
      We are looking for Rigging Info for the Fox in hopes of not having to
      
      work through all the design trial and error.
      
      Thanks
      
      Barry
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
      
      No joke.  In some ways I wish it were.
      
      My ASI usually reads below 80. Just what I'd expect.  The gps was reading
      around 100-105 in dead calm air with the Aerocets slung underneath.  I did a
      double check to make sure that I didn't have the GPS set to Km as I also use
      the unit in the car and we have to use metric on the highways here.  I
      usually reset it to MPH when I put it in my flight bag and to metric after I
      download my flight to the computer.
      
      There is an island 19.8 miles distance from my house on the day I took the
      GPS readings I flew from the island over my house in just under 12 minutes.
      The reason I timed the trip has to do with all the locals here who rate
      their boats on how long it takes to get to Exploits Island and how much fuel
      they use in doing the trip.  I always grin an tell them 12 minutes and less
      than a gallon of gas ( Imperial gallon )  That makes my speed out to be 99
      mph.  Right around that time they mention that I won't drop in because of
      the salt water...
      
      A couple of long time pilots of Merlins and Avids have commented to me on
      how fast my plane seems to be.  That is probably the most subjective
      assessment that can be made.  But at least it makes me feel pretty good.
      
      Like your self I'm sceptical of that amount of speed.  My GPS is relatively
      new but they have been known to have errors ... More the further north you
      go.  On that day I flew 246 miles according to the track on the GPS.  My
      total air time from the time I turned the unit on was almost exactly 3
      hours.  Considering that I did a 7 minute engine warm up/taxi and 4 practice
      circuits as well as the taxi back to the beach (much shorter) my airspeed
      must have been close to the 100 point... go figure.
      
      The greatest thrill of flying this plane is its ability to get in and out of
      some pretty small ponds.
      
      Noel
      
      
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com 
      > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave
      > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 12:21 PM
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Door Struts
      > 
      > 
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
      > 
      > Hi Noel,
      > I don't have gas strut on doors and my doors will stay open without a 
      > problem.
      > 
      > Also I saw your picture the other day and you have a nice 
      > looking Kitfox.
      > 
      > What are your true airspeeds on floats in MPH  ? you must be 
      > joking about 
      > the 105 comment ?
      > 582 Kitfox 3 is likely to be close to low 80s at very best.
      > 
      > Dave
      > 
      > 
      > ----- Original Message ----- 
      > From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
      > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com>
      > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 8:09 AM
      > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Door Struts
      > 
      > 
      > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Noel Loveys" 
      > <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
      > >
      > > My strut (1) is mounted on the back.  It doesn't flutter at 
      > all in flight.
      > > Airspeed may be a factor... The asi reads around 85mph in 
      > still air.  The
      > > gps says closer to 105.
      > >
      > > Photography with the door open is exceptional.  There is nothing to 
      > > vibrate
      > > the lens of the camera and of course nothing to diffuse the 
      > image.  I tend
      > > to use wider angle lenses and point and press then crop the 
      > image on the
      > > ground.  If you use a digital camera ( usually I do ) try 
      > to get one with
      > > the most pixels possible and don't use the digital zoom.  
      > For 35MM I stick
      > > with the slowest film to do the job and a 1A(very light 
      > salmon colour)
      > > filter on a UV filter.  The 2 1/4 Sq allows more 
      > flexibility with film but 
      > > I
      > > use the same filter pac.  Leave the lenses at infinity and set the 
      > > exposure
      > > before leaving the ground.
      > >
      > > I use the neck strap until the door is closed and the 
      > camera is stowed.
      > >
      > > Noel
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >> -----Original Message-----
      > >> From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      > >> [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
      > >> kurt schrader
      > >> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 2:10 AM
      > >> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > >> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Door Struts
      > >>
      > >>
      > >> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader
      > >> <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      > >>
      > >> The struts are usually installed on the front, but
      > >> some have put them in back.  This allows for easier
      > >> entry and exit, but in back is almost certain to
      > >> flutter, if opened in flight.  I kept mine in front on
      > >> the factory mounts.  S-5 model
      > >>
      > >> Kurt S.
      > >>
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      >  
      >  
      >  
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      True I did have the turbo version of the NSI, and I don't have the
      manual with me, but the induction system, ignition  and redrive are the
      same. Under idle and approach they are very similar,  no boost
      condition. While I don't dispute your opinion I would strongly suggest
      Graeme give my suggestion a try. Did you get those idle numbers from the
      manual? This is not a rotax or rotax gear box set up. Torsional
      differences is why the NSI redrive was designed the way it was. 
      
      Rick
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Fox5flyer
      Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 3:49 AM
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      
      
      All of that might be true for the turbo, but not for the normally
      aspirated.
      Deke
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: wingsdown <mailto:wingsdown@comcast.net>  
      Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 9:37 PM
      Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      
      !200 too 1400 RPMs is fine. 1350 is what I remember as recommended. Any
      more and you run the risk of floating off the end of the strip. What you
      have to rethink with the Sub is running lean. You cannot go full rich on
      landings, just cant, especially if you do that cross or down wind.  Just
      lean her out for the power sitting you have. Remember if you have a go
      around you need to  do two things instead of one,  full rich  full
      power. Yea, yea you shouldn't have to do that, OK well then you need a
      different engine or fuel management system. Even on the ground if you
      don't lean so that a quick push on the ego stick causes her to stumble
      or quite she is to fat and nobody likes a fat lady, with few exceptions
      :).  So for the NSI/Subaru folks that's just the way it is if you run
      the TBI. Might want to do the idel adjustment on a hot engine.
      
      Rick
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of QSS
      Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 1:20 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      
      
      Hi Guys, I am having problems with the idle on my subaru and have twice
      now had to do a dead stick landing when pulling power on final. Has
      anyone with an Ellison TBI had a similar experience. Im running on
      1200-1400 at idle and when on the ground and warming the engine up it
      runs fine but after flying for an hour or so she begins running rough at
      low revs and will quit on me if im not careful when I pull power.
      
      Regards
      Graeme 
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | KITFOX PARTS AND OTHER  AIRCRAFT PARTS FOR SALE  UPDATE: | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "wingsdown" <wingsdown@comcast.net>
      
      
         KITFOX PARTS AND OTHER  AIRCRAFT PARTS FOR SALE  UPDATE: 081306
      
      Just listed on Ebay wings and such under kitfox.................starting
      bid is $1.00 (SOLD)
      
      Also just listed on Ebay flight gear bag and  accessories under flight
      bag............. (SOLD)
      
      
      Custom air oil separators as seen on sportflight pic post $150.00
      each......................both for 250 
      
      CAP 140 complete hub assembly for NSI redrive, may fit others, no blades
      $1,500 OBO............. 
      
      E.I digital EGT instrument, no probe $180 each or both for
      $300.00.................... 
      
      Hand held radio Yaesu VXA-200. This was there top of the line model and
      should be compared to same now, has altitude,density altitude,pressure
      alt. Temp, VOR heading plus extra Nmhi battery and programming software
      and cable, list was over $600.00 sell for $350.00....................
      
      COM/nav antenna model VHF5-1 by AAE thin flat composite style list $125
      sell for $85.00.................. 
      
      
      Intercom by PS Engineering model PM1000II with digital cockpit record
      option $300.00.................. 
      
      Electric clock model MD-90 $60.00.....................
      
      Turtle deck with smoke grey lexan, has scratch in glass 150.00 if you do
      a pick up I have material for replacement......sold
      
      Electric servo/ jack screw assembly $500.00 OBO.................. 
      
      Wheel pant left side only painted ready to mount or repaint
      $50.00............ 
      
      Rudder $300.00..............sold 
      
      Elevator $225.00..............sold
      
      VDO gages:
      
      2 1/8 tack , water temp,oil pressure, boost, large RPM 3 1/8 maybe 1/4,
      EGT make offer.............. 
      
      Cargo bay bag with aluminum custom fit bottom, no sagging.  $95.00
      ......................... 
      
      Left long wing, moderate damage pick up only,
      $1,500.00....................sold 
      
      Right long wing major tip damage , $750.00................sold 
      
      Lift struts, pair, faired $600.00 pick up only................sold 
      
      Horizontal Stabilator faired strut braces pair $100.00.................
      
      
      Custom super trapp exhaust system. Will require the welding of a 3 bolt
      flange to exhaust down pipe. $300.00 Pics on request....................
      
      EA-81 turbo engine parts, blocks,  engine mounts left and right, cranks,
      rods, push rods, heads, cams, open price to be set, accepting
      offers................ 
      
      NSI alternator pulley New $60.00....................... 
      
      
      SS flight controls all factory parts available in excellent
      condition.................... 
      
      Strut end farings. These go at the top of the strus for less drag.
      $60.00 for the complete set never installed.....SOLD
      
      Carbon monoxide by coguardian. Plugs into lighter socket audible plus
      digital level indicator. They have a web site. $99.00 ...............
      
      Bendix/King fin type transponder antenna with ground plane plate
      $50.00.....................
      
      Airborne vacuum regulator valve model 2H3-23 #9AK  FAA PMA list $728.00
      in ACS catalog make offer..................
      
      Airborne filter mount with filter best offer.............
      
      
      Wood pistol grips modified one short on passenger PIC side regularl
      length with PTTs $50.00 both..................
      
      Mr. Funnel large for water seperation funnel filling of fuel
      $20.00...............
      
      Remote PTT $5.00 with other purchse..............
      
      
      Cessna dual vacuume gage with pop up no vac indicators can be used on
      single system PN C668519-0101 $35.00............
      
      Tire or tyre front Aero classic 11X4.00-5 8ply with new tube
      $40.00......................
      
      Cockpit light with flood or spot adjustment (model S1990) with red or
      white light adjustment, with dim bright adjustment manufactured by
      soderberg $55.00.......................
      
      Landing light pulse unit. This is a CODE 3 unit model 700 which will
      pulse or run steady, switch able $30.00. Beats the heck out of STC
      units...........
      
      
      Thanks so much
      
      
      Rick
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      We have no problems with the Subaru Eggenfellner modifications. You could  
      look into using the factory original computer and installing an aftermarket fuel
      
       pressure regulator. There are no adjustments and has been to 13000  nonturbo.
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      I searche for Ellison TBI and came up with a lot of hits such as below. You  
      could try the same search and look for similar problems.
      
      _Ellison TBI Unframed!_ 
      (http://aolsearch.aol.com/aol/redir?src=websearch&requestId=c9af36654124e801&clickedItemRank=1&userQuery=Ellison+TBI&clickedItemURN
      http://www.eaa1000.av.org/fltrpts/q200/tbiunframed.htm&title=Ellison+TBI+Unfra
      med!&clickedItemPageRanking=1&clickedItemPage=1)    
      There was never anything wrong with the Ellison TBI.  The TBI masked a fuel 
      header tank ... Brian installs a Ellison  TBI because it is simpler, lighter, 
      ...http://www.eaa1000.av.org/fltrpts/q200/tbiunframed.htm 
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Little help with windshield please. | 
      
      I'm stuck for a bit on the wings waiting for parts and have started 
      installing a new windshield. I removed all the fabric from one butt rib 
      and I noticed that there is no reinforment strip to catch the rivets 
      from the skylight. I can find no reference to one in the build manual 
      but placed one anyway. I have no need to strip the butt rib on the other 
      side but it is also lacking this strip. Is it normally there or not?  I 
      think I could place one without removing the fabric. 
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      NSI Turbo Operating limits from Lance:
      
      IDLE                    1350-1400
      Cruse                   3200-4400 (3600-4000 best)
      Take off RPM (Max)      5600
      Take off (Minutes)      3
      Max continuous RPM      4800
      Never exceed RPM        5900
      
      EXHAUST GAS TEMP
      Green arch              1350-1575
      Yellow arch             1550-1600
      Red arch                1600
      
      OIL PRESSURE: (PSI)
      
      Red                     0-20
      Yellow                  20-35
      Green                   35-72
      
      Lance placed special attention to never allowing the oil pressure to 
      fall below 20 psi.  RPM must be high enough to maintain the pressure 
      above 20 psi.  Needed attention to this in my experience occurs when 
      the engine is very hot.  I also have NSI's published limits for other 
      engines, also, should anyone want them.
      
      Jim Crowder
      
      At 04:49 AM 8/13/2006, you wrote:
      >All of that might be true for the turbo, but not for the normally aspirated.
      >Deke
      >
      >----- Original Message -----
      >From: <mailto:wingsdown@comcast.net>wingsdown
      >To: <mailto:kitfox-list@matronics.com>kitfox-list@matronics.com
      >Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 9:37 PM
      >Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Engine quitting
      >
      >!200 too 1400 RPMs is fine. 1350 is what I remember as recommended. 
      >Any more and you run the risk of floating off the end of the strip. 
      >What you have to rethink with the Sub is running lean. You cannot go 
      >full rich on landings, just cant, especially if you do that cross or 
      >down wind.  Just lean her out for the power sitting you have. 
      >Remember if you have a go around you need to  do two things instead 
      >of one,  full rich  full power. Yea, yea you shouldn't have to do 
      >that, OK well then you need a different engine or fuel management 
      >system. Even on the ground if you don't lean so that a quick push on 
      >the ego stick causes her to stumble or quite she is to fat and 
      >nobody likes a fat lady, with few exceptions :).  So for the 
      >NSI/Subaru folks that's just the way it is if you run the TBI. Might 
      >want to do the idel adjustment on a hot engine.
      >
      >Rick
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Ethanol and wing tanks | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
      
      I know, I know, we have already discussed that many times but on the 
      Jabiru list, there is a Bill Evans who writes the following:
      
      "The fuel tank problem can be solved. The airlines and Military use a
      Thiokol Rubber sealant generally known as PRC."
      
      Then later,
      
      "I can buy PRC here from the local aircraft service and maintenance
      shops. I believe it is manufactured by Pro-Seal now. You might search on
      the part number PRC-1422 A2 The A is the thin stuff and the 2 is the pot
      life. Full cure is probably 8 hours at 70F."
      
      Just to let you know, guys. I don't know the first thing about that 
      product, I am only the go-between, the messenger, the informant, the 
      spy, the turncoat, the ... ok, I'll shut up! :-)
      
      Cheers,
      Michel
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Little help with windshield please. | 
      
      Dave
         
        My manual calls for a reenforcement strip.  However the original builder did
      not install it.  Anyway, when I replaced the windshield I used SS screws with
      a nylon washer on top and a SS washer and nut on the underside of the butt rib.
      It takes a little more time to install with screws, but I have not had any
      signs of the Lexan cracking as I have seen with rivets.  Since I was using washers
      I did not see the need for a reenforcement strip.
         
        If you use this method, be sure to drill holes in the Lexan a bit larger than
      the screws to take care of contraction and expansion from temperature changes.
         
        Hope this helps.
         
        Jimmie
      
      "Dave G." <occom@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
                I'm stuck for a bit on the wings waiting for parts and have started installing
      a new windshield. I removed all the fabric from one butt rib and I noticed
      that there is no reinforment strip to catch the rivets from the skylight.
      I can find no reference to one in the build manual but placed one anyway. I
      have no need to strip the butt rib on the other side but it is also lacking this
      strip. Is it normally there or not?  I think I could place one without removing
      the fabric. 
         
         
         
         
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: small file Blank series V weight and balance  | 
      
      This is a recurring thread and often addresses the benefit of sealing the horizontal
      stabilizer/elevator gap.
      
      John Kerr
      
      -------------- Original message -------------- 
      From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> 
      
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader 
      > 
      > I kept my CG forward so that I could carry a large 
      > load in the baggage area with no problem. If I need 
      > to move it aft some, I have a second battery just aft 
      > of the firewall that I can relocate further aft to 
      > make fine adjustments. 
      > 
      > I calculate it will hold 135 lbs in the back, even 
      > with full fuel and 2 people and still be OK. Running 
      > empty, a 170 lb pilot can run all but the header tank 
      > dry and still be in CG. I am over that weight, so 
      > I've got all the fuel available too. 
      > 
      > This does mean that I have a forward CG with no other 
      > load on board though. But on my cross country flights 
      > the average load puts it in a great place for an 
      > enjoyable ride. 
      > 
      > For landing, I normally use 1/2 flaps and push flaps 
      > up on touchdown. It sits right down and stays there. 
      > No flaps, I have to be careful or it will bounce, if I 
      > don't stick the tail right. So far I do my best 
      > landings when no one is looking and flub it 
      > publically. :-( 
      > 
      > Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo 
      > 
      > --- AMuller589@aol.com wrote: 
      > 
      > > what is your c.g. you may need weight in the tail 
      > > and should have at least a mid range c.g. 
      > 
      > __________________________________________________ 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      <html><body>
      <DIV>This is a recurring thread and often addresses the benefit of sealing the
      horizontal stabilizer/elevator gap.</DIV>
      <DIV> </DIV>
      <DIV>John Kerr</DIV>
      <DIV> </DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px
      solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: kurt schrader
      <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> <BR><BR>> --> Kitfox-List message
      posted by: kurt schrader <SMOKEY_BEAR_40220@YAHOO.COM><BR>> <BR>> I kept
      my CG forward so that I could carry a large <BR>> load in the baggage area
      with no problem. If I need <BR>> to move it aft some, I have a second battery
      just aft <BR>> of the firewall that I can relocate further aft to <BR>>
      make fine adjustments. <BR>> <BR>> I calculate it will hold 135 lbs
      in the back, even <BR>> with full fuel and 2 people and still be OK. Running
      <BR>> empty, a 170 lb pilot can run all but the header tank <BR>> dry
      and still be in CG. I am over that weight, so <BR>> I've got all the fuel available
      too. <BR>> <BR>> This does mean that I have a forward CG with no
      other <BR>> load on board though. But on my cros
       s coun
        <BR>&
       > _
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Little help with windshield please. | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Dave and Diane <ddsyverson@comcast.net>
      
      Dave G,
      
      The manual for my Model 7 calls for a strip of aluminum bonded with structural
      
      adhesive on the inside edge of the upper capstrip on the buttrib. The 
      fastners for the windscreen are supposed to go into the aluminum strip.
      
      Sincerely,
      
      Dave S
      St Paul, MN
      
      
      On Sunday 13 August 2006 3:59 pm, Dave G. wrote:
      > I'm stuck for a bit on the wings waiting for parts and have started
      > installing a new windshield. I removed all the fabric from one butt rib and
      > I noticed that there is no reinforment strip 
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Little help with windshield please. | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Dave G." <occom@ns.sympatico.ca>
      
      I figured there should be one. I've installed one on the side I stripped. I 
      guess I'll have a go at the other side. Thanks. 
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Ethanol and wing tanks | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
      
      Michel,
      
      My only thought on that is that the military and airlines do not use alcohol 
      containing fuels, but jet-(something).  I'm pretty sure I wouldn,t want to 
      be the Beta tester for the group using alcohol containing mo-gas.  I have 
      already sloshed one completed wing tank and don't want to do it again or 
      make that twice if the Thiakol material doesn't work.
      
      ' though, I did a quick search on Google and found that there is a BD-4 
      thread recommending the material in the metal wing conversion.  I don't know 
      which fuel they use.
      
      Lowell
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Michel Verheughe" <michel@online.no>
      Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 2:36 PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Ethanol and wing tanks
      
      
      > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
      >
      > I know, I know, we have already discussed that many times but on the 
      > Jabiru list, there is a Bill Evans who writes the following:
      >
      > "The fuel tank problem can be solved. The airlines and Military use a
      > Thiokol Rubber sealant generally known as PRC."
      >
      > Then later,
      >
      > "I can buy PRC here from the local aircraft service and maintenance
      > shops. I believe it is manufactured by Pro-Seal now. You might search on
      > the part number PRC-1422 A2 The A is the thin stuff and the 2 is the pot
      > life. Full cure is probably 8 hours at 70F."
      >
      > Just to let you know, guys. I don't know the first thing about that 
      > product, I am only the go-between, the messenger, the informant, the spy, 
      > the turncoat, the ... ok, I'll shut up! :-)
      >
      > Cheers,
      > Michel
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Little help with windshield please. | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Dave and Jimmie,
      
      2 seperate considerations here.  There are washers
      made to be used on the inside of the rivets to keep
      them from pulling thru the wood, if that is the only
      consideration.  The glued in strip is just easier to
      keep in place than trying to hold a washer while
      pulling rivets, but the washer gives you and option.
      
      Second, there should be a reinforcement between the
      rib cap and the rib web.  This is so that the rib cap
      glue does not let go with the strong lift created by
      the windscreen.  That has happened a few times.
      
      I made "L" shaped reinforcements that are glued and
      riveted to the web, then drilled thru for the
      windscreen bolts I used like Jimmie's, instead of
      rivets.  I didn't reinforce every bolt, but maybe
      every third.  For the other bolts I just used washers
      like Jimmie did.
      
      Kurt S.
      
      --- Jimmie Blackwell <jimmieblackwell@sbcglobal.net>
      wrote:
      
      > Dave
      >    
      >   My manual calls for a reenforcement strip. 
      > However the original builder did not install it. 
      > Anyway, when I replaced the windshield I used SS
      > screws with a nylon washer on top and a SS washer
      > and nut on the underside of the butt rib.  It takes
      > a little more time to install with screws, but I
      > have not had any signs of the Lexan cracking as I
      > have seen with rivets.  Since I was using washers I
      > did not see the need for a reenforcement strip.
      >    
      >   If you use this method, be sure to drill holes in
      > the Lexan a bit larger than the screws to take care
      > of contraction and expansion from temperature
      > changes.
      >    
      >   Hope this helps.
      >    
      >   Jimmie
      > 
      > "Dave G." <occom@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
      >           I'm stuck for a bit on the wings waiting
      > for parts and have started installing a new
      > windshield. I removed all the fabric from one butt
      > rib and I noticed that there is no reinforment strip
      > to catch the rivets from the skylight. I can find no
      > reference to one in the build manual but placed one
      > anyway. I have no need to strip the butt rib on the
      > other side but it is also lacking this strip. Is it
      > normally there or not?  I think I could place one
      > without removing the fabric.
      
      __________________________________________________
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Those are the limits I recieved too.  However, I use
      1450 as my max EGT, 1800 rpm and 30 psi oil pressure
      as my minimums.
      
      I can see lower rpm and oil pressures when landing,
      but I try to correct them ASAP.  My oil pressure gauge
      flashes at me below 30 psi.  No inflight shutdowns to
      date, intended or otherwise.
      
      I can not operate in the 4000 rpm range below 1450
      egt, even full rich.  I normally cruise at 32-3300 rpm
      and 85 knots/98 mph.  Seems to be the prop's sweet
      spot for smoothness.
      
      Kurt S.  S-5/NSI turbo
      
      --- Jim Crowder <jimlc@att.net> wrote:
      
      > NSI Turbo Operating limits from Lance:
      > 
      > IDLE                    1350-1400
      > Cruse                   3200-4400 (3600-4000 best)
      > Take off RPM (Max)      5600
      > Take off (Minutes)      3
      > Max continuous RPM      4800
      > Never exceed RPM        5900
      > 
      > EXHAUST GAS TEMP
      > Green arch              1350-1575
      > Yellow arch             1550-1600
      > Red arch                1600
      > 
      > OIL PRESSURE: (PSI)
      > 
      > Red                     0-20
      > Yellow                  20-35
      > Green                   35-72
      > 
      > Lance placed special attention to never allowing the
      > oil pressure to 
      > fall below 20 psi.  RPM must be high enough to
      > maintain the pressure 
      > above 20 psi.  Needed attention to this in my
      > experience occurs when 
      > the engine is very hot.  I also have NSI's published
      > limits for other 
      > engines, also, should anyone want them.
      > 
      > Jim Crowder
      
      __________________________________________________
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
      
      Be very careful with pressure regulators.  I added one
      to my plane and it never got off the ground.  During
      testing it failed shut.  There is no fail-safe
      operation that way.  One small "O" ring shut off all
      fuel and I had to remove it.  If you know of one that
      is fail safe, you might try it, but be careful.
      
      Kurt S.
      
      --- AMuller589@aol.com wrote:
      
      > We have no problems with the Subaru Eggenfellner
      > modifications. You could  
      > look into using the factory original computer and
      > installing an aftermarket fuel 
      > pressure regulator. There are no adjustments and
      > has been to 13000 nonturbo.
      
      __________________________________________________
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Engine quitting | 
      
      --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jim Crowder <jimlc@att.net>
      
      Kurt,
      Those all look to be good conservative numbers to me.  My plane has 
      never been flown enough to confirm the sweet spot, but I suspect it 
      would be similar to yours.  I can say that with a hot engine, lower 
      RPM's lead to lower oil pressure and hence your 1800 rpm seems about 
      right.  We have just set the rpm by watching the oil pressure and 
      like you, have looked for something like 30 psi.  Lance told me the 
      20 psi is the absolute minimum.
      
      I've finished my chemo treatments and am beginning to feel better.  I 
      came down with a cold a few days ago, which in my vulnerable state 
      has set me back a few days, but I think I will be able to get back to 
      my hangar latter this week to get things going again.  The first 
      three sessions went so well there was some doubt about the benefit of 
      the fourth session, but in the end it was decided I would receive 
      it.  I will know the result from it in about six weeks.  Even without 
      it, my PSA is down to 0.21 before the fourth treatment and I do still 
      have my prostate gland.  Remember all of you guys over 40, get your 
      PSA screening test regularly.
      
      I still plan to sell my current engine and total fire-wall forward 
      package with the CAP and go for a 1320 gross wt. and simple 
      airplane.  I have given it a lot of thought and at my age (70 in 
      Sept.), it seems the smart way to go.
      
      Jim Crowder
      
      At 10:41 PM 8/13/2006, you wrote:
      >Those are the limits I recieved too.  However, I use
      >1450 as my max EGT, 1800 rpm and 30 psi oil pressure
      >as my minimums.
      >
      >I can see lower rpm and oil pressures when landing,
      >but I try to correct them ASAP.  My oil pressure gauge
      >flashes at me below 30 psi.  No inflight shutdowns to
      >date, intended or otherwise.
      >
      >I can not operate in the 4000 rpm range below 1450
      >egt, even full rich.  I normally cruise at 32-3300 rpm
      >and 85 knots/98 mph.  Seems to be the prop's sweet
      >spot for smoothness.
      >
      >Kurt S.  S-5/NSI turbo
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |