Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Tue 10/31/06


Total Messages Posted: 30



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:05 AM - Re: Landing Practices (John Anderson)
     2. 03:12 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question (JC Propellerdesign)
     3. 03:47 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language (Ceashman@aol.com)
     4. 06:31 AM - Re: Landing Practices (kurt schrader)
     5. 07:44 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language (kurt schrader)
     6. 07:51 AM - Model IV Brake Lines (Dan McIntyre)
     7. 08:38 AM - Re: Kitfox history (Michael Gibbs)
     8. 08:52 AM - Re: Model IV Brake Lines (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
     9. 09:02 AM - Re: Model IV Brake Lines (wwillyard@AOL.COM)
    10. 09:33 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox history (Frank Miles)
    11. 09:37 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question (Michel Verheughe)
    12. 09:39 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question (Michel Verheughe)
    13. 09:46 AM - Re: AEROCET FLOATS FOR CLASSIC 1200 (PEDRO PEREZ)
    14. 09:59 AM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language (Michel Verheughe)
    15. 10:49 AM - Sight Tube Printout (Jim Crowder)
    16. 11:53 AM - Re: Sight Tube Printout (dcsfoto)
    17. 03:16 PM - Re: Re: Kitfox history avid catalina  (Malcolmbru@aol.com)
    18. 03:49 PM - 3 Pointers (Rex Shaw)
    19. 04:35 PM - Re: 3 Pointers (GENTRYLL@aol.com)
    20. 05:03 PM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language / Michel (Ceashman@aol.com)
    21. 05:16 PM - Re: 3 Pointers (Don Smythe)
    22. 06:30 PM - Re: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing  (Malcolmbru@aol.com)
    23. 06:36 PM - Re: 3 Pointers (Cudnohufsky's)
    24. 06:42 PM - Fuse on the way (Tony Partain)
    25. 07:59 PM - Re: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing (kirk hull)
    26. 08:08 PM - Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language (Noel Loveys)
    27. 08:42 PM - Re: Fuse on the way (Lowell Fitt)
    28. 08:44 PM - Re: AEROCET FLOATS FOR CLASSIC 1200 (Noel Loveys)
    29. 08:44 PM - Re: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing (Lowell Fitt)
    30. 09:27 PM - Re: Landing Practices (Richard D'Archangel)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:05:00 AM PST US
    From: "John Anderson" <janderson412@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Landing Practices
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "John Anderson" <janderson412@hotmail.com> Yes Kurt, I know wht you mean. Back in my dusting days we might do 100 landings, all greezers, then spong it all over the home base strip...with all the early homers watching!! From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Landing Practices --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Heck, I only mess up in public. Like my best landings no one ever sees. But the day I got a crowd.... I hit that little dip in the grass runway squarely and bounced 7 times. (Never over a foot high, but bounce, bounce, bounce...) Or the time I tried to do the 1/2 flaps landing on pavement and dump the flaps to make it stick trick. Yanked up instead of pushing down on the handle. Straight up 10 feet, hover? Then a nice recovery while the next plane could hardly talk for laughing over the radio. Forgiven, but not forgotten Guy Kurt S. --- Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com> wrote: ....... > (Man I hate it when I do that. And in public, too.) > Guy Buchanan > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly > to Bob Ducar. > > Do not archive Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the New Yahoo.com (http://www.yahoo.com/preview) _________________________________________________________________ Discover fun and games at @ http://xtramsn.co.nz/kids


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:23 AM PST US
    From: "JC Propellerdesign" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question
    Sweden is a Great country to fly in, a lot of uncontrolled airspace, I live on the west coast of Lake V=E4nern. Fuel is not that expensive (everything is relative) Good visibility most of the time. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: Michel Verheughe To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:30 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> Thank you very much, Trey, Deke, Leni, Kurt and Clem, and ... tusen takk, Jan! :-) Now, I know how to talk like a real pilot! :-) I browsed the internet, trying to find the right terminology but I couldn't find it. Next time, I'll try: "Torp Tower, Lima lima tango, flight of thousands, ... :-) Nah, I don't think they appreciate that kind of humour. Jan, for your information, we - Norwegian pilots - think that Sweden is a paradise, your airfields are really great and your ATC services, very friendly. I have been flying mostly the western coast, Fj=E4llbacka, Varberg, H=F6gan=E4s. Cheers, Michel do not archive


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:47:17 AM PST US
    From: Ceashman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language
    Hello Michel. I have a couple of questions for you. In Norway, when contacting the tower at the local airport, Is the language used English? and is this international, meaning the same for all European countries? If this is the case. Then someone learning to become a pilot must also learn the english language. And of course, the English pilot jargon. That has got to be difficult, as we know there are many books on the subject of radio communication (in English). I know that all class B and international arrival airports must use the English language, so that all international arrivals communicate with control and tower in English. Much easier that way. Lastly; What is the Norwegian word for "information" ? What is/are the Norwegian word/s for "in formation" ? Off- topic but good topic as always Michel. All the best. Eric. Classic IV. Atlanta Do Not Archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:31:20 AM PST US
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Landing Practices
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Even worse. Without my knowing it, my FAA examiner moved to the airport community where I had my plane in KY. Saw him several months later. Thumbs up on my flying and testing, but lets not talk about the landings he saw.... Luckily I didnt fly a pax that wanted to go when I was still testing, or I might have had a more serious discussion with the FAA. Pax was an insistant mechanic and pilot friend, but I was not going to compromise, or risk a testing incident. Never know who is watching.... but that is my excuse for the bad ones he saw. ;-) Theyll screw you up even when you dont know they are watching..... And I agree with the glasses discussion. Bifocals, not graduated lenses! I am so blind now I cant even read what I am writing. Got to build another plane while I can still see to do it. Kurt S. Do not archive --- John Anderson <janderson412@hotmail.com> wrote: > Yes Kurt, I know wht you mean. Back in my dusting > days we might do 100 > landings, all greezers, then spong it all over the > home base strip...with all the early homers watching!! (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:44:46 AM PST US
    From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220@yahoo.com> Just as a side note, I expected more English in latin America flying, but it is almost all Portugese and Spanish down here. Problems arise. People hit mountains. Lately the largest crash in Brazil history happened as a corporate jet flown by 2 US pilots scrubbed the bottom of a 737. The 2 corporate pilots are in jail. Wrong altitude. The 737 crashed in the jungle. I am thinking of bringing a tape recorder along to copy some of the transmissions so unbeilevers can listen for themselves. Often one controller is transmitting on 2 radios on the same frequency to cover a large area. Anywhere in the middle you get a horrendous echo effect. Europe is better! Kurt S. I want a sticker to put on the 767 saying "My other plane is a KitFox!" John McB!!! Got any stickers? Do not archive --- Ceashman@aol.com wrote: > Hello Michel. > > I have a couple of questions for you. > In Norway, when contacting the tower at the local > airport, Is the language > used English? and is this international, meaning the > same for all European > countries? > If this is the case. Then someone learning to become > a pilot must also learn > the english language. And of course, the English > pilot jargon. That has got to > be difficult, as we know there are many books on the > subject of radio > communication (in English). > > I know that all class B and international arrival > airports must use the > English language, so that all international arrivals > communicate with control and > tower in English. Much easier that way. > > Lastly; > What is the Norwegian word for "information" ? > What is/are the Norwegian word/s for "in formation" > ? > > Off- topic but good topic as always Michel. > All the best. Eric. > Classic IV. Atlanta > > Do Not Archive Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited (http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited)


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:51:48 AM PST US
    Subject: Model IV Brake Lines
    From: "Dan McIntyre" <danm@gangnailtruss.com>
    Been trying to figure out the best way to route the brake lines down to the brakes on my model IV. I looked over the Sport Flight photos but couldn't see anything very detailed and my instruction manual isn't any help either. I did a search on the Matronic list but was unsuccessful. Anyone out there that has built a model IV with tube gear I'd like to how you routed your lines. Thanks in advance Dan Mc Intyre N4344DM Model IV, Jab 2200


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:38:54 AM PST US
    From: Michael Gibbs <MichaelGibbs@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox history
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michael Gibbs <MichaelGibbs@cox.net> Paul sez: >...the initial Kitfox design was pretty much a direct copy of the >Avid Flyer. Reportedly the first Kitfox was created from an Avid >Flyer kit... The Kitfox can't be a "direct copy" of the Avid Flyer, it IS an Avid Flyer. It's not like someone came along and copied the design, it was divergent evolution! :-) Mike G. N728KF


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:19 AM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Model IV Brake Lines
    zip tied to frame at about front gear attach point, through fabric of underside, ziptied to front tube of gear, through fabric on inside of gear, exited at base of gear frame. John Kerr 740 hours Classic IV, 912ul -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Dan McIntyre" <danm@gangnailtruss.com> Been trying to figure out the best way to route the brake lines down to the brakes on my model IV. I looked over the Sport Flight photos but couldn't see anything very detailed and my instruction manual isn't any help either. I did a search on the Matronic list but was unsuccessful. Anyone out there that has built a model IV with tube gear I'd like to how you routed your lines. Thanks in advance Dan Mc Intyre N4344DM Model IV, Jab 2200 <html><body> <DIV>zip tied to frame at about front gear attach point, </DIV> <DIV>through fabric of underside, ziptied to front tube of gear, </DIV> <DIV>through fabric on inside of gear, </DIV> <DIV>exited at base of gear frame.</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>John Kerr 740 hours</DIV> <DIV>Classic IV, 912ul</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: "Dan McIntyre" &lt;danm@gangnailtruss.com&gt; <BR> <META content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1" name=Generator><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --> <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Been trying to figure out the best way to route the brake lines down to the brakes on my model IV. I looked over the Sport Flight photos but couldn't see anything very detailed and my instruction manual isn't any help either. I did a search on the Matronic list but was unsuccessful. Anyone out there that has built a model IV with tube gear I'd like to how you routed your lines. </FONT></P> <P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks in advance</FONT> </P> <P align=center><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#008000 size=2>Dan Mc Intyre</FONT></P> <P align=center><FONT face=Arial size=2>N4344DM</FONT></P> <P align=center><FONT face=Arial size=2>Model IV, Jab 2200</FONT></P><BR><BR><PRE><B><FONT face="courier new,courier" size=2 color000000?> </B></FONT></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE> <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:46 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Model IV Brake Lines
    From: wwillyard@AOL.COM
    Dan, I routed mine down inside the trailing edge of the aft vinyl faring. Of course this will only work if you are installing the faring option. Bill W. Classic IV 912 -----Original Message----- From: danm@gangnailtruss.com Sent: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:55 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Model IV Brake Lines Been trying to figure out the best way to route the brake lines down to the brakes on my model IV. I looked over the Sport Flight photos but couldn't see anything very detailed and my instruction manual isn't any help either. I did a search on the Matronic list but was unsuccessful. Anyone out there that has built a model IV with tube gear I'd like to how you routed your lines. Thanks in advance Dan Mc Intyre N4344DM Model IV, Jab 2200 ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:33:56 AM PST US
    From: "Frank Miles" <f.miles.tcp.833@clearwire.net>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox history
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Frank Miles" <f.miles.tcp.833@clearwire.net> How does that saying go? Something like: "A rose by any other name is still a rose". -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Gibbs Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Kitfox history --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michael Gibbs <MichaelGibbs@cox.net> Paul sez: >...the initial Kitfox design was pretty much a direct copy of the >Avid Flyer. Reportedly the first Kitfox was created from an Avid >Flyer kit... The Kitfox can't be a "direct copy" of the Avid Flyer, it IS an Avid Flyer. It's not like someone came along and copied the design, it was divergent evolution! :-) Mike G. N728KF --


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:30 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> On Oct 31, 2006, at 5:52 AM, kurt schrader wrote: > They expect you to be within about 200 meters horizontal distance Thank you, Kurt, it's good to know. > If you have not practiced the break, it is better to just have each > plane turn base a little > later than the first to get your landing distance and still keep site > of each other. This is exactly what we do; extend the downwind leg to give some space. Cheers, Michel do not archive


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:39:28 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> On Oct 31, 2006, at 12:11 PM, JC Propellerdesign wrote: > Sweden is a Great country to fly in, a lot of uncontrolled airspace, I > live on the west coast of Lake Vnern. Ok, Jan. I fly my Kitfox from Jarsberg ENJB, about one hour flight from Gteborg. We will certainly meet one day. How about arranging a Scandinavian Kitfox fly-in? Hej d, Michel do not archive


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:50 AM PST US
    From: "PEDRO PEREZ" <5324@PRTC.NET>
    Subject: Re: AEROCET FLOATS FOR CLASSIC 1200
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "PEDRO PEREZ" <5324@PRTC.NET> HELO; LIST DO ANY OF YOU HAVE EXPIRENCE WITH AEROCET FLOATS OF A KITFOX... HOW IS THE WEIGHT? HARDWARE NEEDED? AND ANY MODIFICATIONS!!!!!!!!! REGARDS, PEDRO PEREZ FROM: PUERTO RICO


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:59:01 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> On Oct 31, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Ceashman@aol.com wrote: > In Norway, when contacting the tower at the local airport, Is the > language used English? Affirmative, Sir! > and is this international, meaning the same for all European > countries? Negative, Sir! > What is the Norwegian word for "information" ? Informasjon. > What is/are the Norwegian word/s for "in formation" ? I formasjon. As you can see, Eric, the Germanic and Latin Europe has much words with the same origin. But, to answer your question about ATC languages, in Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) and Benelux (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg) maybe 95% of GA pilots speak English. In other European countries, it is not so, with probably France where they insist in speaking only French. Their lost, really, because they feel very stupid the day they want to cross a border. Anyway, the Norwegian law, of which I can speak for, says that the pilot radio operator license need to be in English. For those who really don't master the language at all, there is a "limited license" that can be obtained, in Norwegian, but that can't be used abroad, for evident reasons. So, all my ATC contacts are in English, and even on non-controlled airfields, I declare my traffic pattern intentions in English. On very small fields, some Norwegians use "Norglish" which is a mixture of the two languages. E.g. "Lima, lima, tango, turning hyre nedvind (right downwind) three sixty." or something like that. But, whenever I talk with other pilots, I stress how important it is that ATC communication is understood and that, if in doubt, one can, and should, speak Norwegian or any other language that would facilitate communication, understanding and ultimately, safety. Whether we like it or not, English has become the de-facto language of ATC and VTS (Vessel Traffic Surveillance). The only place where you can still use limited French is in SAR procedures like MAYDAY (m'aider) and PAN PAN (panne). My conclusion is: Fear makes you speak foreign tongues! :-) Cheers, Michel do not archive


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:49:52 AM PST US
    From: Jim Crowder <jimlc@att.net>
    Subject: Sight Tube Printout
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: Jim Crowder <jimlc@att.net> There was a request from a member on the list for the background printout that was once available through our list for the printed strip to be placed behind the Kitfox sight tube used to indicate fuel level. I never saw a response to the request. I too and looking for this printout. I have done a Google search and attemped to find it in our archive with no success. Does anyone know how to obtain it. I remember it as being very well done. Jim Crowder


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:53:06 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Sight Tube Printout
    From: "dcsfoto" <david@kelm.com>
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "dcsfoto" <david@kelm.com> kitfox has them for sale Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=71376#71376


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:16:25 PM PST US
    From: Malcolmbru@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Kitfox history avid catalina
    so what is the deal on the avid catalina?


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:49:48 PM PST US
    From: "Rex Shaw" <rexjan@bigpond.com>
    Subject: 3 Pointers
    From: GENTRYLL@aol.com Subject: Kitfox-List: Landing Practices I am new at taildragging and am having a problem doing three point landings in that I am stalling out a litte too high each time and bouncing. I attribute this to being used to a 172 where I physically sit higher because of the bigger plane. Is it best to try to land with a little power like in a wheel landing then backing off the power and pulling back on the stick after the main gear is on the runway or maybe even just continue with a full wheel landing? Hi ! I can sympathise with your problem. I remember my transition to tail draggers and it was in my MKIV Kitfox. Yep used to do the same thing. What I eventually worked out for me in my plane anyway was if I can get that stick right back hard into the cushion without the nose flaring high before touch down then it will go just nice. Hope that will work for you. I had no issues with elevator authority but yes I do believe especially in earlier models gap sealing can be the answer but are you lacking the ability to get the tail down ? As I said I can easilly overdo it and flare high. Also as someone said too much flap might be causing you to not be able to get the tail down. Personally I tend to use just a tiny amount. Actually what I need for trim at about 70 knots. Also I would comment that I can remember when learning getting the nose too high and about 2ft off the ground. I did this a couple of times before I applied power to sort it. Anyway I just held the stick hard back and it floated down fairly gently but I don't recommend it. However it might not be the end of the world. By the way it is my personal belief that taildraggers are meant to be 3 pointed and generally speaking this is the easiest way to land them. I feel wheeler landings leave one wide open in a crosswind as the tail drops. Just my idea of things. Be sure to get that stick right back before touch down and hopefully you'll be right. Rex.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:35:18 PM PST US
    From: GENTRYLL@aol.com
    Subject: Re: 3 Pointers
    Thanks Rex, I see from your writing some things I am doing differently. First I am coming in at just over 50 mph. Second, I am using no flaps. With this combination, it doesn't take much to make it stall. I don't think elevator authority is the problem as when I pull it back it drops. I think I am just flaring too high as I am used to being in a bigger, taller plane. I like the idea another fellow sent in of flying just above the runway and down the center until my brain adjust for where bottom really is. Thanks for the help.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:03:45 PM PST US
    From: Ceashman@aol.com
    Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language / Michel
    Michel. Thanks very much for describing the communication policy for most of Europe. (shame about the French) I remember when learning to fly I was always afraid to use the radio for fea r of screwing something up during tower communication (mostly factual than fearing :). Still today, there are times when I get tongue tied and can't seem to let it out correctly that I am arriving 8 miles from the north. Or I am banking to the left for a right downwind and I blurt out that I am entering a left downwind. And here I am an ex Brit speaking English, It is a good thing ther e is a press to talk button otherwise the entire airport traffic would cringe at my use of foul words describing how much of an idiot I am. Then again, that is the thrill and secrecy of being up there by oneself ! You say: "some Norwegians use "Norglish" which is a mixture of the two languages. E.g. "Lima, lima, tango, turning h=F8yre nedvind (right downwind) three sixty." or something like that". Michel, sometimes my announcements sound very close to Norglish. Put it this way, even having puckered and coughed then pressed the dreadful button what comes forth from my Kitfox, aint proper English!! With this in mind I will have to admire the tenacity of non British (Continentals :)) European pilots with extra workload to consider when flyin g. When up there alone, have you ever said out loud to yourself "bugger... how could I have said that." Have you ever laughed out loud to yourself! What a hobby this is, brilliant! All the best. Eric Do Not Archive


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:16:56 PM PST US
    From: "Don Smythe" <dosmythe@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: 3 Pointers
    You might try the Tapscotte shuffle. This is what my instructor (Bob Tapscotte) taught me and I did it on my first landing. Worked great and gave me the feeling of the runway. Approach for a wheel landing, let the mains touch, keep enough power to maintain flight and easy go around. Let the mains touch every 50 feet or so. This will give you a good feel for where you are in relation to the runway. Keep the power on and just let the mains kiss the runway. The longer the runway the better. Just a thought, Don Smythe ----- Original Message ----- From: GENTRYLL@aol.com To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:32 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 3 Pointers Thanks Rex, I see from your writing some things I am doing differently. First I am coming in at just over 50 mph. Second, I am using no flaps. With this combination, it doesn't take much to make it stall. I don't think elevator authority is the problem as when I pull it back it drops. I think I am just flaring too high as I am used to being in a bigger, taller plane. I like the idea another fellow sent in of flying just above the runway and down the center until my brain adjust for where bottom really is. Thanks for the help.


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:12 PM PST US
    From: Malcolmbru@aol.com
    Subject: Re: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing
    has any one seen the video of the BI wings in formation wheel skiing on water


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:36:07 PM PST US
    From: "Cudnohufsky's" <7suds@Chartermi.net>
    Subject: Re: 3 Pointers
    My experience learning to land my Kitfox 4, I would approach at 50 -55 with about 50% Flaps (would help with visability), had a notch on the trim so I knew where to set the trim, would normally do a forward slip to the runway (also helped with visability) and then straighten out and hold off until it settled in, if I did real well the tail wheel would touch just a moment before the mains and I knew I was down, if I flaired to high I would drop a little and bounce, I would then give a little throttle and flair it back in with the throttle. In time I either hit it right or within one bounce. It is all about getting to know your plane. The comment about doing touch and goes down the runway is a great way to get to know your plane, my flying buddy got so proficient with his Kolb he could do touch and gos down the runway while alternating from main tire to main tire, it's all about practicing and knowing your plane. Good luck and have fun. ----- Original Message ----- From: GENTRYLL@aol.com To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:32 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 3 Pointers Thanks Rex, I see from your writing some things I am doing differently. First I am coming in at just over 50 mph. Second, I am using no flaps. With this combination, it doesn't take much to make it stall. I don't think elevator authority is the problem as when I pull it back it drops. I think I am just flaring too high as I am used to being in a bigger, taller plane. I like the idea another fellow sent in of flying just above the runway and down the center until my brain adjust for where bottom really is. Thanks for the help.


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:59 PM PST US
    Subject: Fuse on the way
    From: "Tony Partain" <tpartain@bendcable.com>
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Tony Partain" <tpartain@bendcable.com> The triger has been pulled... Should have a Fuse in a couple of weeks. Let the fun begin! -------- Tony Partain Partain Transport Company Bend Oregon http://www.vansairforce.net/Graphics/PartainTruckingCo.htm RV7 IO360 CS 116WT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=71453#71453


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:59:11 PM PST US
    From: "kirk hull" <kirkhull@kc.rr.com>
    Subject: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing
    I have seen a photo of it but cant seem to find it in my collection. It must be one of the things I lost in my last hd crash. I think it came in a power point with a lot of other photos. You might try airliners.net. _____ From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Malcolmbru@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:29 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing has any one seen the video of the BI wings in formation wheel skiing on water


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:08:32 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: OFF-TOPIC: ATC question/ Add Language
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca> This will only happen if the transmitters happen to be single sideband suppressed carrier types. FM or PM has what is known as a capture effect where only the strongest signal is heard... Not used in aviation. AM radio ( that's us) uses a carrier ( 50% of the power out put ) and two information carrying sidebands. The problem is if these stations carriers are not in exact sync all you will get every time the tower transmits will be a loud squeal... Some times you will hear this when two pilots try to contact the tower at the same time. The advantage of the AM. signal is higher fidelity than SSB. and the tower will know immediately if two or more planes try to call at the same time. Noel > > I am thinking of bringing a tape recorder along to > copy some of the transmissions so unbeilevers can > listen for themselves. Often one controller is > transmitting on 2 radios on the same frequency to > cover a large area. Anywhere in the middle you get a > horrendous echo effect.


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:42:39 PM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Fuse on the way
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net> Tony, This is good news. I loved the building process. I hope there are more like you out there. Welcome to the group. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Partain" <tpartain@bendcable.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:42 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Fuse on the way > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Tony Partain" <tpartain@bendcable.com> > > The triger has been pulled... Should have a Fuse in a couple of weeks. Let > the fun begin! > > -------- > Tony Partain > Partain Transport Company > Bend Oregon > http://www.vansairforce.net/Graphics/PartainTruckingCo.htm > > RV7 IO360 CS 116WT > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=71453#71453 > > >


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:10 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: AEROCET FLOATS FOR CLASSIC 1200
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca> I have been flying with straight Aerocet floats. The documentation that I got with the plane says that the floats add about 50# to the weight of the plane. (511 on wheels and 560 on floats as measured by the builder) My plane is a Model III-A I have an extra support, part of the float set up, that strengthens the floor of the fuselage. The ventral strake fits on where the tail wheel spring used to be. It has a rod that passes through the fuselage through one of the tow bar mounting holes. There is a very small hole where the water rudder cable goes through the skin. The water rudder controls are all bicycle style cables. They should be checked often in corrosive environments like mine. Then again if I had open pulley type controls they would need just as much attention. The floats are readily repaired with available epoxy repair kits. Don't' ask how I know this.... All I will say is it had nothing to do with flying. With these floats in place it is very easy, especially if you're my size to overload the plane. There is a decent size storage compartment, big enough to carry 10 Gal. U.S. in each float if you have the gas in 2.5 Gal containers. The important thing in fitting floats is the CG of the plane should be directly over the CF ( Centre of flotation) of the float. Other wise ballast may have to be carried not to fly but to taxi and get up on step. Finding the CF of any float is fun but darned if I know how to do it on Full Lotus. I guess for that float I'd have to blow the dust off my graphics calculator... Or ask Full lotus ;-) Working alone with block and tackle I can re install my Aerocets in about four hours. Most of that time is spent in lifting the plane and keeping it level. If I were working in a proper hangar with a chain fall/over head crane and a lifting bar I think I could install a set of floats in just over two hours... Three hours with help :-) The first installation will take much longer especially if you are working out location of the floats and angle of incidence and cutting struts to fit. Because the installation on the Kitfox uses existing fixtures on the plane installation is a bit faster than say on a Super Cub or Aeronca. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > PEDRO PEREZ > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:11 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: AEROCET FLOATS FOR CLASSIC 1200 > > > --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "PEDRO PEREZ" <5324@PRTC.NET> > > HELO; LIST > > DO ANY OF YOU HAVE EXPIRENCE WITH AEROCET FLOATS OF A KITFOX... > HOW IS THE WEIGHT? > HARDWARE NEEDED? > AND ANY MODIFICATIONS!!!!!!!!! > > REGARDS, > PEDRO PEREZ > FROM: PUERTO RICO > > > > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:24 PM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing
    --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net> I have a short video of one of our guys wheel skiing. I guess I should send it to Dave for posting on the Trailer park site. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "kirk hull" <kirkhull@kc.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:58 PM Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing >I have seen a photo of it but cant seem to find it in my collection. It > must be one of the things I lost in my last hd crash. I think it came in > a > power point with a lot of other photos. You might try airliners.net. > > > _____ > > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > Malcolmbru@aol.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:29 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 3 Pointers water wheel skiing > > > has any one seen the video of the BI wings in formation wheel skiing on > water > > >


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:30 PM PST US
    From: "Richard D'Archangel" <rdarchangel@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Landing Practices
    Try landing with the door open. It's easy to see how close you are to the ground that way. Good luck, Dick GENTRYLL@aol.com wrote: > I am new at taildragging and am having a problem doing three point > landings in that I am stalling out a litte too high each time and > bouncing. I attribute this to being used to a 172 where I physically > sit higher because of the bigger plane. Is it best to try to land > with a little power like in a wheel landing then backing off the > power and pulling back on the stick after the main gear is on the > runway or maybe even just continue with a full wheel landing? > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --