Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Tue 12/12/06


Total Messages Posted: 21



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:33 AM - Re: Vixen: Fuel Gauge Leak.. and Clear Fuel Line Recommendation (FlyboyTR)
     2. 08:33 AM - Advice on fuel system upgrades (Marco Menezes)
     3. 08:57 AM - fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane (Jim Crowder)
     4. 09:10 AM - Re: New - SKI FLYING Video (ramrod25)
     5. 10:06 AM - Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades (Guy Buchanan)
     6. 10:58 AM - Re: First Flight G-CDXY (David Steade)
     7. 11:48 AM - Re: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane (Michel Verheughe)
     8. 11:51 AM - Re: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane (Clem Nichols)
     9. 12:55 PM - Re: First Flight G-CDXY (Michel Verheughe)
    10. 01:09 PM - Model 4 headroom clearance (John Cotter)
    11. 02:02 PM - Re: Model 4 headroom clearance (flier)
    12. 02:32 PM - Normalized Fuse (David Anthony)
    13. 03:22 PM - Re: Model 4 headroom clearance (jeff puls)
    14. 03:55 PM - Re: Model 4 headroom clearance (dcsfoto)
    15. 04:34 PM - Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades (Don Smythe)
    16. 06:11 PM - Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades (Noel Loveys)
    17. 06:14 PM - Re: Cabin Heater Questions (JOHN May)
    18. 06:22 PM - Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades (john perry)
    19. 07:11 PM - Re: Re: Heater as requested (dave)
    20. 07:13 PM - Re: Model 4 headroom clearance (dave)
    21. 07:53 PM - gross weight (kirk hull)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:33:16 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Vixen: Fuel Gauge Leak.. and Clear Fuel Line Recommendation
    From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net>
    Maxwell, My IO-240 had approximately 260 hours. My rebuilt alternator drive coupling arrived yesterday...plan to install today and hopefully have the engine back on the frame before I leave the airport. Travis -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen N-789DF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=81004#81004


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:33:20 AM PST US
    From: Marco Menezes <msm_9949@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Advice on fuel system upgrades
    Listers: I've just ordered a HacMan unit from Greensky Adventures and a Facet fuel pump from ACS (as back-up to Mikuni pump). Does anyone have advice on installation, operation of these units in context of Rotax 582-90 fuel system? A plumbing diagram for the Facet as a back-up would be really useful. Thanks in advance. Marco Menezes Model 2 582 N99KX --------------------------------- Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:57:00 AM PST US
    From: Jim Crowder <jimlc@att.net>
    Subject: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane
    Hey guys. Check out the link below. I don't know how he got himself into the plane and boy could it fly. Jim Crowder http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlV8WJ6N3nU do not archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:40 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: New - SKI FLYING Video
    From: "ramrod25" <r_wren@wfec.com>
    Dave - I also want to add my thanks to you for your awesome videos. While I sit here in this office it is just so enjoyable to fire up the video and watch all the fun you are having. Keep 'em coming - they are really neat. -------- Regards, Rodney Wren Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=81046#81046


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:06:17 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades
    At 08:32 AM 12/12/2006, you wrote: >I've just ordered a HacMan unit from Greensky Adventures and a Facet fuel >pump from ACS (as back-up to Mikuni pump). Does anyone have advice on >installation, operation of these units in context of Rotax 582-90 fuel system? I can't help you with the Facet pump, but I use the HACman and like it. I installed it per the instructions with few modifications and it works well. I exchanged their awful black tube wrapping for a plastic braided sock that looked a lot nicer. I also used an EPM.AV firewall fitting with a long piece of fire-sleeve on the firewall side to help preclude an engine fire entering the cabin after melting the vent tubing. The only thing I can add that's not in the instructions is that when I'm flying I typically go full rich before any significant descent. I then descend at the angle I want and set the RPM's for 5800. I vary the angle of descent and RPM to get an EGT of 1200. If I get too steep, the EGT gets too high, even at 5800 RPM, (over-driving the engine,) so I pull it up, (slow down,) until the EGT's get back below 1200. (My EIS gives me a warning at 1200 so the EGT's never get over about 1210F.) If I want to descend steeper I drop the RPM way down. (You have to watch the cold seizure then.) > Guy Buchanan K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:58:41 AM PST US
    From: "David Steade" <david.steade@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: First Flight G-CDXY
    Michel There is much more inertia with the Mk7 due to the increased weight this makes it more stable. The simplified mixer for the flaperons together with the differential movement results in less rudder input than on the Mk3 and a lot more feel. My Mk3 had a 582 so the increase in power with the 912S is very noticeable with a significant increase in cruise speed and climb rate. There are lots of small changes that have added to the comfort. Good heater, no drafts from the doors, somewhere to put the coat and bags, a bit more width in the cockpit all in all quite a different aircraft. In the UK there is only one other Mk7 flying with two more being built, most of the Kitfox fleet of about 50 aircraft are Mk2 and 3 versions with a handful of Mk1 and 4 and just one Mk5. Regards David


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:41 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane
    On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Jim Crowder wrote: > Hey guys. Check out the link below. I don't know how he got himself > into the plane and boy could it fly. That's the French Cri-Cri. We have one in our district and I have seen it flying once. They guy can carry the wings under his arms. The only thing is that it can't be registered in Europe as an ultralight aircraft (a paradox, really) because the wings are not very big and his stall speed is over 63 km/h, our definition of the utralight class. Therefore it needs the PPL-A license to fly. Silly, isn't it? Cheers, Michel do not archive


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:51:10 AM PST US
    From: "Clem Nichols" <cnichols@scrtc.com>
    Subject: Re: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane
    And if you want to find out more about this amazing little plane, go to the web-site shown on the clip, www.flight.cz/cricri. Clem Nichols Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Crowder" <jimlc@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:56 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: fluff: world's smallest twin engine airplane > > Hey guys. Check out the link below. I don't know how he got himself into > the plane and boy could it fly. > > Jim Crowder > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlV8WJ6N3nU > > do not archive > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:55:56 PM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: First Flight G-CDXY
    On Dec 12, 2006, at 7:36 PM, David Steade wrote: > There is much more inertia with the Mk7 due to the increased weight > this makes it more stable. Thanks, David. Of course, one would expect that the aircraft becomes better and better in the later models. Now, I know better how. Cheers, Michel do not archive


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:09:28 PM PST US
    From: "John Cotter" <jcotter@siu.edu>
    Subject: Model 4 headroom clearance
    Hi folks, I am considering purchase of a model 4 in need of some work. My concern is there seemed to be very little, perhaps only one half inch, of clearance between my head and the primary structure directly above. I am 5=928 =BD=92=92 tall (a giant by no means). It seemed like a little turbulence could be a problem with head banging. The gentleman who owns the aircraft is a couple of inches shorter than I, so it could have been a non-issue. I did not see any extra padding under the stock seats pads. Ideas, comments, or design information appreciated. Thanks john John D. Cotter, Interim Chair SIUC Department of Aviation Technologies (618) 536 3371 jcotter@siu.edu


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:02:04 PM PST US
    From: "flier" <FLIER@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Model 4 headroom clearance
    Hey John, Unless the plane has unusually thick cushions or a non-standard seat you shouldn't have any problem. I'm 5-11" and my dad and brother are 6-2" (they ARE pretty big) and we fit. It's cozy but not uncomfortable. I've never banged my head on the skylight. Regards, Ted IV-2000 962TC --- Original Message --- From: "John Cotter" <jcotter@siu.edu> Subject: Kitfox-List: Model 4 headroom clearance >Hi folks, > > > >I am considering purchase of a model 4 in need of some work. My concern >is >there seemed to be very little, perhaps only one half inch, of clearance >between my head and the primary structure directly above. I am 5=928 >=BD=92=92 tall >(a giant by no means). It seemed like a little turbulence could be a >problem with head banging. The gentleman who owns the aircraft is a >couple >of inches shorter than I, so it could have been a non-issue. I did not >see >any extra padding under the stock seats pads. Ideas, comments, or >design >information appreciated. > > > >Thanks > >john > > > >John D. Cotter, Interim Chair > >SIUC Department of Aviation Technologies > >(618) 536 3371 > >jcotter@siu.edu > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:32:44 PM PST US
    From: David Anthony <rangelyflyer@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Normalized Fuse
    DO NOT ARCHIVE I believe I've narrowed my choices to the Kitfox SS or the RV12 - plan to place my order at Air Adventure 2007. I'm hoping someone will be willing to answer my question about the Kitfox SS fusalog. Is the fuse normalized after welding by the factory? If not why do you think this process is not important to the strength of the structure? I sent this question to the factory and have not received a reply; they must be busy with the move. __________________________________________________


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:22:47 PM PST US
    From: "jeff puls" <pulsair@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Model 4 headroom clearance
    John, I am 6'4" and fly a Kitfox Classic IV with Skystar cushions. I am quite comfortable. But you have to remember, I flew a Hughes 300C on police patrol for 5,000 hours. I find a lot of dropped coins on the sidewalk. Jeff Columbus, Ohio ----- Original Message ----- From: John Cotter To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:09 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Model 4 headroom clearance Hi folks, I am considering purchase of a model 4 in need of some work. My concern is there seemed to be very little, perhaps only one half inch, of clearance between my head and the primary structure directly above. I am 5'8 =BD'' tall (a giant by no means). It seemed like a little turbulence could be a problem with head banging. The gentleman who owns the aircraft is a couple of inches shorter than I, so it could have been a non-issue. I did not see any extra padding under the stock seats pads. Ideas, comments, or design information appreciated. Thanks john John D. Cotter, Interim Chair SIUC Department of Aviation Technologies (618) 536 3371 jcotter@siu.edu


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:55:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Model 4 headroom clearance
    From: "dcsfoto" <david@kelm.com>
    I have a Model III ,5'10 and no problems Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=81137#81137


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:34:51 PM PST US
    From: "Don Smythe" <dosmythe@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades
    We had a discussion long time ago about the Facet Backup on a 582. About the only thing that can go wrong with the standard Rotax pulse pump is 1. The pulse line ruptures causing the pump to become inoperative. 2. The internal diagram of the pump ruptures causing the pump to stop pumping. In the case of #2, if you turn on the backup Facet, the fuel will be pumped into the Rotax pump and then through the ruptured diaphragm and into the crankcase. In this case, a backup will do you no good what-so-ever. In the case of #1, if you turn on the backup, the fuel will also be pumped out the ruptured pulse line and all over the engine. Still not good. Are there any new opinions on this possible situation? Don Smythe ----- Original Message ----- From: Marco Menezes To: Matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Advice on fuel system upgrades Listers: I've just ordered a HacMan unit from Greensky Adventures and a Facet fuel pump from ACS (as back-up to Mikuni pump). Does anyone have advice on installation, operation of these units in context of Rotax 582-90 fuel system? A plumbing diagram for the Facet as a back-up would be really useful. Thanks in advance. Marco Menezes Model 2 582 N99KX ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:55 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Advice on fuel system upgrades
    One way valves ( out) on both pumps and then plumb them in parallel. Takes care of all the problems you stated. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Don Smythe Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:04 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Advice on fuel system upgrades We had a discussion long time ago about the Facet Backup on a 582. About the only thing that can go wrong with the standard Rotax pulse pump is 1. The pulse line ruptures causing the pump to become inoperative. 2. The internal diagram of the pump ruptures causing the pump to stop pumping. In the case of #2, if you turn on the backup Facet, the fuel will be pumped into the Rotax pump and then through the ruptured diaphragm and into the crankcase. In this case, a backup will do you no good what-so-ever. In the case of #1, if you turn on the backup, the fuel will also be pumped out the ruptured pulse line and all over the engine. Still not good. Are there any new opinions on this possible situation? Don Smythe ----- Original Message ----- From: Marco <mailto:msm_9949@yahoo.com> Menezes Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:32 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Advice on fuel system upgrades Listers: I've just ordered a HacMan unit from Greensky Adventures and a Facet fuel pump from ACS (as back-up to Mikuni pump). Does anyone have advice on installation, operation of these units in context of Rotax 582-90 fuel system? A plumbing diagram for the Facet as a back-up would be really useful. Thanks in advance. Marco Menezes Model 2 582 N99KX _____ Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! <http://answers.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwM zOTY1 NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx> Answers and get answers from real people who know. href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com href="http://www.kitlog.com">www.kitlog.com href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c href "http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matron


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:14:51 PM PST US
    From: JOHN May <jpm7940@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Cabin Heater Questions
    Nick, I am developing a heating system that uses hand warmers which when opened and exposed to the air heat up to about 125 degrees F. I have calculated that it will take about 12 of these wrapped around and duct taped to a scat tube stuffed with pot scrubbers. It should last long enough for a 10 hour flight. DO NOT ARCHIVE John May SW Michigan


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:22:14 PM PST US
    From: "john perry" <eskflyer@lvcisp.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on fuel system upgrades
    Don I totally agree with you on the fuel pump , and the problems it can cause. I rebuild my mikuni pump every 2 years and have never had a problem . it only cost $ 11 . to rebuild . Also replace the pulse line . Would be easy to this even every year at condition inspection time . takes little time and would really be worth the trouble . Just my humble opinion John Perry


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:18 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: Heater as requested
    Hi Marco, Sorry I was lazy and just stuck a camera in the cowl. but here you go http://www.cfisher.com/heatmuff/ Hope that helps you and yes that is carsb heat that works too. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Marco Menezes To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:08 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Heater Dave, Could you publish some pictures of your heat muff installation? Also, anyone else who has used similar technique with a 582 exhaust system. dave <dave@cfisher.com> wrote: I have a piece of alum bent at about 90 deg in front on bungees to deflect, fumes heat etc and protect the bungees from the same. I have a scoop on backside of rad and it works gear -- no fumes but Carbon monoxide it odourless. Heat Muff on muffler is the best heat aquiring mod you can make in my findings. Although a fellow on this list Jim from Belle River Ontario that I have met a few times at flyins has a oil cooler plumbed in his coolant I think and he says it works great . It is mounted over top of runner pedals . He could probably tell you better on the performance of it. He has little fans on it too. BTW His Kitfox IV is "pristine" and with 912 weighs at about 600 lbs- so you know it a rocket ! I have very minimal airleaks as I have sealed up some like you have. What dave are you talking to ? >> I saw your video and you have spring gear. << Too many Daves LOL Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "kitfoxmike" To: Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Heater > > Ok Dave you asked for it [Twisted Evil] , now you say that my heat system > has the risk of co in the cabin, first off it pulls from the right side of > the radiator, and only the right 4 inches. I channel it right in through > the hole for the bungee's in the floor. Now, before I had spring gear I > had the bungee gear, guess what, the holes in the floor where open, guess > what else, in the summer time I had to close that area up as much as > possible, why because I would get a bunch of heat from the radiator and > would push up through the floor. Now you can't tell me with your concern > that you now should have a concern for co entering your airplane, I saw > your video and you have spring gear. Also, the old spring gear had a > problem from exhaust hitting the leg going from the center of the plane to > the wheel, that's what caused most of that gears problem, I can see it > hitting the leg and shooting up into the little hole for the bungees. I > would be concerned for your situation when i! > t comes to the exhaust as well. [Wink] > > -------- > kitfoxmike > > > > > Read


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:47 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: Model 4 headroom clearance
    You should be fine as I am 5' 9" and no issues. If you in turbulence tighten your harness :) Better yet -- take a Kitfox fora flight or snag a ride in one. Where are you located? Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: John Cotter To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:09 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Model 4 headroom clearance Hi folks, I am considering purchase of a model 4 in need of some work. My concern is there seemed to be very little, perhaps only one half inch, of clearance between my head and the primary structure directly above. I am 5'8 =BD'' tall (a giant by no means). It seemed like a little turbulence could be a problem with head banging. The gentleman who owns the aircraft is a couple of inches shorter than I, so it could have been a non-issue. I did not see any extra padding under the stock seats pads. Ideas, comments, or design information appreciated. Thanks john John D. Cotter, Interim Chair SIUC Department of Aviation Technologies (618) 536 3371 jcotter@siu.edu


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:53:27 PM PST US
    From: "kirk hull" <kirkhull@kc.rr.com>
    Subject: gross weight
    I am flying a classic 4 with a suberu engine and all of the speedster mods except the shorter wing. I was thinking about testing for a gross weight of 1250 and was wandering if anybody has had problems operating over 1200?




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --