Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Sat 01/06/07


Total Messages Posted: 41



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:48 AM - Re: new kitfox2 (Michel Verheughe)
     2. 04:59 AM - Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (Bob)
     3. 06:24 AM - KitFox 2 (Mike)
     4. 06:28 AM - cont.A65 (dwight purdy)
     5. 06:44 AM - Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar (FlyboyTR)
     6. 07:29 AM - Re: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (Lowell Fitt)
     7. 07:42 AM - Re: dead-stick topic (FlyboyTR)
     8. 07:50 AM - Re: Re: dead-stick topic (Aerobatics@aol.com)
     9. 08:32 AM - Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (kentk)
    10. 09:16 AM - Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (Joel Mapes)
    11. 09:41 AM - Re: KitFox 2 (Don Pearsall)
    12. 09:52 AM - Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (jdmcbean)
    13. 10:02 AM - Norwegian Stalls (was: dead-stick topic) (Michael Gibbs)
    14. 10:13 AM - Re: KitFox 2 (Mike)
    15. 11:20 AM - Re: kitfox2 new builder (skyflyte@comcast.net)
    16. 12:43 PM - Rotax engines (jdmcbean)
    17. 02:04 PM - Kitfox Model V for Sale (Grant Fluent)
    18. 02:06 PM - Re: Rotax engines (dave)
    19. 02:09 PM - Re: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (Lynn Matteson)
    20. 02:49 PM - Re: Manual or electric trim? (nealscherm@comcast.net)
    21. 02:58 PM - landing gear shock cord (pilotpat)
    22. 03:03 PM - Re: Norwegian Stalls (Michel Verheughe)
    23. 03:10 PM - Re: Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar (Tom Jones)
    24. 03:34 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (Michel Verheughe)
    25. 03:35 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (Tom Jones)
    26. 03:52 PM - Re: Re: Manual or electric trim? (Noel Loveys)
    27. 04:08 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (Noel Loveys)
    28. 04:25 PM - Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. (wingnut)
    29. 05:05 PM - Re: Re: Manual or electric trim? (Alan Daniels)
    30. 05:18 PM - Re: Re: Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar (Alan Daniels)
    31. 05:37 PM - Re: Model 4 engine swap (Lyle Persels)
    32. 05:42 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (dave)
    33. 05:45 PM - Re: Norwegian Stalls (dave)
    34. 05:46 PM - Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. (dave)
    35. 05:57 PM - Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. (QSS)
    36. 06:11 PM - Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (kentk)
    37. 07:02 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (mike)
    38. 07:36 PM - Re: Norwegian Stalls (Malcolmbru@AOL.COM)
    39. 08:05 PM - Re: landing gear shock cord (ron schick)
    40. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement (Mdkitfox@AOL.COM)
    41. 09:53 PM - Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. (Lowell Fitt)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:03 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: new kitfox2
    On Jan 6, 2007, at 5:36 AM, kurt schrader wrote: > Michel. Can you take Lynn's pics, reduce them and > post them to the old Sportflight site? Certainly, Sire! Lynn, send them to me directly, thank you. Michel Jester to the court of one pope and two cardinals do not archive (unless you are a list's sinner)


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:59:31 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    From: "Bob" <dswaim1119@comcast.net>
    It's an important part, not too hard to remake, and someday there will be a "next" owner who may not know to check this on pre-flight. If your A&P or FAA inspector see an example of workmanship like this, they'll start looking a lot closer, too. Besides, when it does crack, probably at the second hole, do you want to have to try to get it out once assembled? Easier to just re-make it now. Tip for next time: use the file lengthwise along the edges, not across it, and the edge will stay straight. Bob A&P -------- Remember that internet advice may only be worth what you pay. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85828#85828


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:24:21 AM PST US
    From: Mike <mclayton@rochester.rr.com>
    Subject: KitFox 2
    I have just purchased a Kitfox 2, SN 89, which was damaged in a departure stall. The wings were badly damaged, while the fuselage structure suffered only minor damage, along with the prop, which was wood. It has a 532 installed. Does anyone know where I can get plans, and perhaps parts for rebuilding the wing? The main front spar appears to be a tube with some kind of I-beam inside. It will need to be replaced. I am also planning on putting airfoils on both the vertical and horizontal stabs, and sealing the gap in the rudder and and elevator. Mikey


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:28:29 AM PST US
    From: dwight purdy <dpurdy@comteck.com>
    Subject: cont.A65
    Question: Is there a reason why I never see a Kitfox with an A65? My guess would be no electric or bad power to weight. How about a c-85? I recently picked up a model lll and would like to put a four stroke in it. Have not measured the with of either. Can you tell me what needs to be done in the way of cowlings? Anyone have pictures of there's ? Thanks, dwight --


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:44:19 AM PST US
    Subject: Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar
    From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net>
    Our Vixen has a unique bracket configuration on the nose wheel for ground ops. The builder also built a custom towbar that is simple and effective. However, the brackets extend from below the wheel pant and then stick out like little wings (where the towbar attaches). So far a very strong system... Our problem is that we (90% of the time) usually work off of grass strips and here in L.A. (lower Alabama) we have lots of rain, soft boggy runways/taxiways, etc. When my nose wheel boggs a little the "wings" catch mother earth and start digging in...then act like a plow! Not good! :( I am getting ready to redesign the towbar system and would like to know what others are using for their swiveling nose wheels. [Question] Once this retro is complete, I would be willing to part with the existing brackets. Its actually a neat system that is very effectiveit just doesnt do well on soft muddy ground! I will take and post a couple of pictures after my next trip to the airport. Thanks, Travis :) -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen N-789DF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85841#85841


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:27 AM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    Thanks for the direct link to the image. First congratulations on your choice of airplane - the best Kitfox ever in my opinion for all the things Kitfoxes are designed to do. My suggestion would be to replace the part. A taper on a fitting like that is designed to spread the forces evenly to the end. By essentially cutting a notch on this one it creates a stress riser which could result in a premature failure. Where are you? Tell us about your project. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "kentk" <kentk25@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 9:42 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement > > > roncarolnikko(at)hotmail. wrote: >> Kent please hit the attach button and show us the part. May or may not >> be a >> problem, but we like to over analyse. Ron NB Ore >> > > > Is the image not showing up for anyone but me? If that is the case, here > is the link to the photo: > > http://forums.matronics.com/download.php?id=3526 > > Regards, > Kent > > -------- > kentk25[at]yahoo > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85817#85817 > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: dead-stick topic
    From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net>
    Just a short response/comment about dead stick landings. Of all major component failures in your airplaneIll take an engine-outhands down! wing, elevator, tail, etcfailsor at worst it chooses its own direction of travel away from the plane all the piloting skill in the world isnt going to help, unless you have a BRS, etc. I have always been a believer in being the PIC and being able to fly the plane without the assistance of forward thrust. Dead stick landings in a C-177 Cardinal were common practiceand actually quite fun. In the 90s we shifted from GA to Quicksilvers and Challengers (about 2500+ hours). Here we found people that had fly-ins with field events. Dead stick landings were our specialtyalways! 9 out of 10 landings I could drop the wheels within 10 feet of the linethe 1 out of 10 I fell short a few feet! Good stuff! My CFI (1970) was a crazy WWII pilot. His stories of walking away from the crash left a deep impression on me. I will try to quote something he said. If you cant control your aircraft at MCA, with or without an engine, or put the #%&@ wheels where YOU want them, with or without an engine, or instantly respond to an inflight emergencywhat gives you the right to think you can fly at 150 knots! Planes dont crash into the airthey crash into the @%#$ ground! Going up in the only option you haveyoure coming down and youd #$% well better know how to put your plane exactly where you want it I dont think I will ever forget his words. may he RIP. :( This diatribe is longer than I had planned. Sorry! However, I have always practiced dead-stick landings, and we are now practicing them in our Kitfox Vixen. During an emergency, time is what you usually dont have. Wasting it (time) trying to figure out what you should do could easily be your killer! Always have a plan, always FLY the planewith or without the engine! As my old CFI (Tommy) said, Going up is optionalyoure coming down! Travis :D -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen N-789DF Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85858#85858


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:50:51 AM PST US
    From: Aerobatics@aol.com
    Subject: Re: dead-stick topic
    Well imagine the first time you practice a deadstick because the engine really did quit.... that's scarey :-)


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:25 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    From: "kentk" <kentk25@yahoo.com>
    lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net wrote: > Thanks for the direct link to the image. First congratulations on your > choice of airplane - the best Kitfox ever in my opinion for all the things > Kitfoxes are designed to do. > > My suggestion would be to replace the part. A taper on a fitting like that > is designed to spread the forces evenly to the end. By essentially cutting > a notch on this one it creates a stress riser which could result in a > premature failure. > > Where are you? Tell us about your project. > > Lowell > > --- Well, first of all, thank you everyone for the excellent advice. I really don't want to use any inferior parts on my plane, but was also concerned about availability of replacement parts. Last year I aquired this KitFox Model 4-1200 from a friend who originally purchased it back in '94. He had worked on the fuselage, but not much else. I live in College Station, TX and have an ASEL Private Pilot License. My flight experience is mostly Cessna 172 and 150s. I have some low wing hours, but prefer the high wing. I have zero tail dragger experience. So, at this point I am focused on building the wings. The kit did not include the engine nacelle (nor anything FWF for that matter), so I am undecided as to which powerplant to use and which prop arrangement is best. I am very much in the research phase at this point. Regards, Kent -------- kentk25[at]yahoo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85868#85868


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:16:02 AM PST US
    From: "Joel Mapes" <foxfloatflyer@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    Hi Kent, I used the BlueSky spar inserts on my model 5 and am very pleased with the results. I thought that if any one area of the aircraft should be over designed the spar attach point was it. My aeronautical engineer son agreed. Joel Model 5 912uls _________________________________________________________________ Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win?


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:41:51 AM PST US
    From: "Don Pearsall" <donpearsall@comcast.net>
    Subject: KitFox 2
    Mikey, it sounds like you have a big project ahead of you. Have you tried contacting John McBean at http://www.kitfoxaircraft.com/ He may have the plans and perhaps some parts. Don Pearsall -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 6:23 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: KitFox 2 I have just purchased a Kitfox 2, SN 89, which was damaged in a departure stall. The wings were badly damaged, while the fuselage structure suffered only minor damage, along with the prop, which was wood. It has a 532 installed. Does anyone know where I can get plans, and perhaps parts for rebuilding the wing? The main front spar appears to be a tube with some kind of I-beam inside. It will need to be replaced. I am also planning on putting airfoils on both the vertical and horizontal stabs, and sealing the gap in the rudder and and elevator. Mikey


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:52:37 AM PST US
    From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@cableone.net>
    Subject: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    Regarding Spar Attach Reinforcement, Not to say one way is better then another.. but remember that the aircraft was load tested and flight tested with these reinforcements. The reinforcements didn't fail and to date there has not been an in-flight structural failure of a Kitfox.. Fly Safe !! John & Debra McBean 208.337.5111 www.kitfoxaircraft.com "It's not how Fast... It's how Fun!" -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Joel Mapes Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:15 AM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Rear spar attach reinforcement Hi Kent, I used the BlueSky spar inserts on my model 5 and am very pleased with the results. I thought that if any one area of the aircraft should be over designed the spar attach point was it. My aeronautical engineer son agreed. Joel Model 5 912uls _________________________________________________________________ Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win? -- 11:11 AM -- 11:11 AM


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:02:58 AM PST US
    From: Michael Gibbs <MichaelGibbs@cox.net>
    Subject: Norwegian Stalls (was: dead-stick topic)
    >First sign of a Norwegian stall? Your helmit sticks to the skylight... I think we need a picture of Michel in his cockpit with his Viking helmet on. :-) Mike G. N728KF Do not archive.


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:13:37 AM PST US
    From: Mike <mclayton@rochester.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: KitFox 2
    I just talked to John, and he was extremely helpful! He will be providing a copy of the original instruction manual, which should be very helpful. He also answered several questions I had about increasing the height of the vertical stabilizer and rudder, as well as installing an airfoil on the horizontal and vertical surfaces. Parts-wise, it appears as though some of the parts that will be hard for me to fabricate may be available. Mikey On Jan 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Don Pearsall wrote: > <donpearsall@comcast.net> > > Mikey, it sounds like you have a big project ahead of you. Have you > tried > contacting John McBean at http://www.kitfoxaircraft.com/ > > He may have the plans and perhaps some parts. > > > Don Pearsall > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 6:23 AM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Kitfox-List: KitFox 2 > > > I have just purchased a Kitfox 2, SN 89, which was damaged in a > departure stall. The wings were badly damaged, while the fuselage > structure suffered only minor damage, along with the prop, which was > wood. It has a 532 installed. Does anyone know where I can get > plans, and perhaps parts for rebuilding the wing? The main front > spar appears to be a tube with some kind of I-beam inside. It will > need to be replaced. > > I am also planning on putting airfoils on both the vertical and > horizontal stabs, and sealing the gap in the rudder and and elevator. > > Mikey > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:20:47 AM PST US
    From: skyflyte@comcast.net
    Subject: kitfox2 new builder
    I had this problem many years ago, and after a lot of adjustments, i found the problem. The leather washer had compressed a bit with use, and adjusting the bolt holding the handle to the washer/welded on washer didn't work. The metal pieces were hiting each other before the leather washer could do its job. A thicker leather washer cured the problem. Mike Cannon Model II 490MC -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Frank Miles" <f.miles.tcp.833@clearwire.net> Jerry, It is held in place by friction. You have to tighten the control handle until in flight air pressure will no longer move it. Looks like a poor system but it does work. Frank From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of jerry evans Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 8:59 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: kitfox2 new builder What have you all done with the flap controller I'm playing around with it today and it seems to be loose ,does it hold when you put on flaps or do you have to hold it up? Mine has the leather in it, but seems like it should have clicks or something, any advise? Jerry Evans kitfox 555 -- 1:34 PM -- 1:34 PM <html><body> <DIV>I had this problem many years ago, and after a lot of adjustments, i found the problem.&nbsp; The leather washer had compressed a bit with use, and adjusting the bolt holding the handle to the washer/welded on washer didn't work. The metal pieces were hiting each other before the leather washer could do its job.&nbsp; A thicker leather washer cured the problem.</DIV> <DIV>Mike Cannon</DIV> <DIV>Model II&nbsp;&nbsp; 490MC</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: "Frank Miles" &lt;f.miles.tcp.833@clearwire.net&gt; <BR> <META content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)" name=Generator> <STYLE> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </STYLE> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:SmartTagType name="PersonName" namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"></o:SmartTagType> <STYLE> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } </STYLE> <STYLE> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} pre {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Courier New";} span.EmailStyle18 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:Arial; color:navy;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </STYLE> <DIV class=Section1> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Jerry,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">&nbsp;It is held in place by friction. You have to tighten the control handle until in flight air pressure will no longer move it. Looks like a poor system but it does work.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Frank<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <DIV> <DIV class=MsoNormal style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"> <HR tabIndex=-1 align=center width="100%" SIZE=2> </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <P class=MsoNormal><B><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">From:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"> owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:PersonName w:st="on"><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On</SPAN></B></st1:PersonName><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"> Behalf Of </SPAN></B>jerry evans<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Friday, January 05, 2007 8:59 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> <st1:PersonName w:st="on">kitfox-list@matronics.com</st1:PersonName><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Kitfox-List: kitfox2 new builder</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P></DIV> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P> <DIV> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">What have you all done with the flap controller I'm playing around with it today&nbsp; and it seems to be loose ,does it hold when you put on flaps or do you have to hold it up? Mine has the leather in&nbsp;it,&nbsp;but seems like it should have clicks or something, any advise?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <P class=MsoNormal><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR><BR>Jerry Evans <BR>kitfox 555<IMG id=_x0000_i1025 height=18 src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/04.gif" width=18> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; o: p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" -<o:p Forum Email Kitfox-List The - bsp; font-size:10.0pt;color:black;></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; browse: p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" font-size:10.0pt;color:black; page,<o:p Subscriptions></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; Chat: p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" font-size:10.0pt;color:black; more:<o:p></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; href: 'http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List'>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" font-size:10.0pt;color:black;="================<o:p"></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; bsp: ; NEW: p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" font-size:10.0pt;color:black; Forums!<o:p Web></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; href: 'http://forums.matronics.com'>http://forums.matronics.com</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font size=2 color=black face='Courier New'><span style=" font-size:10.0pt;color:black;="================<o:p"></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE><PRE><B><FONT face="Courier New" color=black size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></B></PRE></DIV><BR> <P><FONT size=2>--<BR>1:34 PM<BR></FONT></P><BR> <P><FONT size=2>--<BR>1:34 PM<BR></FONT></P><PRE><B><FONT face="courier new,courier" size=2 color000000?> </B></FONT></PRE></BLOCKQUOTE> <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:43:43 PM PST US
    From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@cableone.net>
    Subject: Rotax engines
    Just a quick note.. we have been notified of a Rotax Price increase effective Feb 1st . We are placing an engine order on the 22nd of this month if anyone is interested give us a shout. Fly Safe !! John & Debra McBean 208.337.5111 www.kitfoxaircraft.com "It's not how Fast... It's how Fun!"


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:04:51 PM PST US
    From: Grant Fluent <gjfpilot@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Kitfox Model V for Sale
    Hello List Members, I thought I would pass along some info that I received about a Kitfox Model V for sale in South Dakota See the attached photo. Grant Fluent


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:06:19 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: Rotax engines
    John , The talk is 8% increase by Rotax. Can you confirm ? Also what is the cost for Douglas 8 " wheels with the alum tigged on to attach the rotor ? Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: jdmcbean To: Kitfox List Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 3:41 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Rotax engines Just a quick note.. we have been notified of a Rotax Price increase effective Feb 1st . We are placing an engine order on the 22nd of this month if anyone is interested give us a shout. Fly Safe !! John & Debra McBean 208.337.5111 www.kitfoxaircraft.com "It's not how Fast... It's how Fun!"


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:09:32 PM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    I also bought a IV from Texas, without engine or cowl. I settled on a 2200 Jabiru engine and Skyfox cowl after doing a lot of engine research. I'm very well satisfied with the way mine turned out, and its performance, and ease of operation. Lynn Kitfox IV Speedster...Jabiru 2200 On Jan 6, 2007, at 11:31 AM, kentk wrote: > > > lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> Thanks for the direct link to the image. First congratulations on >> your >> choice of airplane - the best Kitfox ever in my opinion for all >> the things >> Kitfoxes are designed to do. >> >> My suggestion would be to replace the part. A taper on a fitting >> like that >> is designed to spread the forces evenly to the end. By >> essentially cutting >> a notch on this one it creates a stress riser which could result in a >> premature failure. >> >> Where are you? Tell us about your project. >> >> Lowell >> >> --- > > > Well, first of all, thank you everyone for the excellent advice. I > really don't want to use any inferior parts on my plane, but was > also concerned about availability of replacement parts. > > Last year I aquired this KitFox Model 4-1200 from a friend who > originally purchased it back in '94. He had worked on the > fuselage, but not much else. I live in College Station, TX and > have an ASEL Private Pilot License. My flight experience is mostly > Cessna 172 and 150s. I have some low wing hours, but prefer the > high wing. I have zero tail dragger experience. > > So, at this point I am focused on building the wings. The kit did > not include the engine nacelle (nor anything FWF for that matter), > so I am undecided as to which powerplant to use and which prop > arrangement is best. I am very much in the research phase at this > point. > > Regards, > Kent


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:49:26 PM PST US
    From: nealscherm@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Manual or electric trim?
    Hey All, I am working on the manual trim on my series 7 and am not particularly satisfied with the arrangement. I had a Vixen before and I liked the electric trim it used. I am at a point were I could go with either one. Any sugesstions or recomendations? I know there was a problem with the early actuators breaking, but did anyone find one that was satisfactory? All opinions appreciated, Neal <html><body> <DIV>Hey All,</DIV> <DIV>I am working on the manual trim on my series 7 and am not particularly satisfied with the arrangement. I had a Vixen before and I liked the electric trim it used. I am at a point were I could go with either one.</DIV> <DIV>Any sugesstions or recomendations? I know there was a problem with the early actuators breaking, but did&nbsp;anyone find one that was satisfactory? </DIV> <DIV>All opinions appreciated,</DIV> <DIV>Neal</DIV> <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:24 PM PST US
    Subject: landing gear shock cord
    From: "pilotpat" <pkelly20@comcast.net>
    Hi all, been watching the postings for a month or so now and am new at this. I have a classic iv kitfox (curently working on) and am doing the bungee cord landing gear. The book says 6 wraps , but I can only get Five, Is there some special tool or method or someone with special tips on how to do this in order to get six wraps? Thanks in advance or does anyone have a Grove landing system , they want to get rid of and make it easy? pilotpat Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85913#85913


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:16 PM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: Norwegian Stalls
    On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Michael Gibbs wrote: > I think we need a picture of Michel in his cockpit with his Viking > helmet on. :-) Ok, I will provide that. Meanwhile, I went flying today, did some stalls (mush down) and listened to 'the sound.' Unfortunately, I'll need to have someone else to fly the plane, in order to find the cause but, so far, I wonder if it is not my elevator. But first, a question: Is this correct?: When we stall gently (mush down), the plane starts stalling the wings first then, if we keep the stick in the stomach, and provided we get enough elevator authority to get the nose up and the speed down, the horizontal stab (and the elevator) will stall too, and the nose will drop. If this is correct, then I think the noise I experience is happening when the horizontal stab stalls and the elevator shakes. Am I getting anywhere? Cheers, Michel


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:10:37 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    The "How to Fly a Kitfox" book says the Vixen will "Follow you around like a puppy if you pull it by the prop hub. it seems to me a handle on the rear of the fuselage would make it easy to push around on the ground. I put some wheels on a scoop shovel and I just scoop up the tail wheel of my classic 4 with and pull it around even with the wings folded. That might work on a nose wheel too. Tom Jones Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85917#85917


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:34:18 PM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: Re: landing gear shock cord
    On Jan 6, 2007, at 11:57 PM, pilotpat wrote: > The book says 6 wraps , but I can only get Five Hello Pilotpat, You will certainly get many advice from this list, as some of us has managed to do it properly and apparently without too much effort. Others, like me, had a hell of a time working this, as I replaced mine last summer. That made me wonder: Are we all working with bungees of the same length? My new ones were quite shorter than the ones I removed after 13 years of good service. I attributed that to natural stretching. But ... was it really? Anyway, it's certainly a two man's job, a lot of sweat, and a vise wrench to hold the bungee as you take a new turn. How are your end fitting? Loops or hooks? When I pulled hard the last turn of the latter (cone spring hook), it came loose. So I went for the loop type. Cheers, Michel


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:35:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: landing gear shock cord
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    Pat Yes, six wraps are needed. The trick is to not loose any slack you gained on one wrap while making the next wrap. There are several ways to do it and I suspect you will get some more replys soon. I wrapped up the jaws of my waterpump plires with electrical tape so as not to damage the cord. I worked from under neath the plane and held each wrap tight in place with the pliers with one hand while I fed the cord around the truss and pulled the next wrap tight with the other hand. Tom Jones Classic 4 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85920#85920


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:52:14 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Re: Manual or electric trim?
    I take it you are talking about elevator trim. There are several GA planes some what similar to the 'Fox that use manual trim tabs... The Champ and Super Cub come to mind. They just use a push pull cable similar to a throttle cable only much lighter to adjust the tab by means of a bell crank on the tab itself. Electric trim is a nice selling point but personally I consider it unnecessary complication. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nealscherm@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:17 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Manual or electric trim? Hey All, I am working on the manual trim on my series 7 and am not particularly satisfied with the arrangement. I had a Vixen before and I liked the electric trim it used. I am at a point were I could go with either one. Any sugesstions or recomendations? I know there was a problem with the early actuators breaking, but did anyone find one that was satisfactory? All opinions appreciated, Neal


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:08:20 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: landing gear shock cord
    Install floats... Save yourself scraped knuckles and a lot of choice four letter words. There have been some good ideas posted here over the last year. Some include lubricating the posts you wrap the bungee around with baby oil...I think some one else suggested talcum powder on the bungee itself. The last two years I put mine on wheels and never got the chance to fly so this year it's going to over winter on the pontoons. Still not a sign of ice on the bay. Five years ago there would have been Ski-Doos everywhere...Thirty years ago there would have been few Ski-Doos but there would have been a lot of Land Rovers every where. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of pilotpat > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:27 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Kitfox-List: landing gear shock cord > > > > Hi all, been watching the postings for a month or so now and > am new at this. I have a classic iv kitfox (curently working > on) and am doing the bungee cord landing gear. The book says > 6 wraps , but I can only get Five, Is there some special > tool or method or someone with special tips on how to do this > in order to get six wraps? Thanks in advance > > or does anyone have a Grove landing system , they want to get > rid of and make it easy? > > pilotpat > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85913#85913 > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:25:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power.
    From: "wingnut" <wingnut@spamarrest.com>
    I'm adding a PDA GPS to my Model 4 and I'm kind of stuck on how to wire power to the PDA. I have a cigarette lighter adapter for the PDA but I don't really have a good place for a cigarette lighter plug in my panel (not to mention how ugly it would look). Ideally, I'd like to do some kind of permanent setup with the PDA's power cable, tucked and tie wrapped neatly into the rest of the harness. Problem is, the PDA is 5V so I can't just wire it into the buss. I suppose that I can hack the lighter adapter and tie wrap it to the frame somewhere behind the panel but Id like something a little more aircraft quality. I know there are other PDA users out there so I was wondering if someone had a suggestion. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85932#85932


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:05:22 PM PST US
    From: Alan Daniels <aldaniels@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: Manual or electric trim?
    I have built and flown with both trim systems. The 7 trim works well, but requires a bit more back pressure due to the weight and mechanism. One of John's flap interlink systems takes care of that if it is a problem. The manual system is faster to use, but can be a little hard to fine tune the trim in flight. There is a little friction in the system, but once you get used to it you will really like it. The electric works great also. Weight is about the same, manual is a little more complex to install. On the manual system I have found that the front adjustment that replaces the electric ram on the manual system needs to be adjusted to the short end of the adjustment range for best and fastest flight. We did all sorts of test to see where the trim tab was in relation to the elevator. The simplest way to quick check it is to put a piece of tape next to the trim lever and mark were it is in normal cruise flight. Then when back on the ground return the trim lever to were you marked it and then hold the elevator to neutral and see were the tab is. You will want to make changes and see were you like it best. This is part of that 40 hour test thing. Bottom line for me is that both trim systems are good. I would use whichever system I had and would be happy with it. If you need an elevator for the electric system I have a spare. nealscherm@comcast.net wrote: > Hey All, > I am working on the manual trim on my series 7 and am not particularly > satisfied with the arrangement. I had a Vixen before and I liked the > electric trim it used. I am at a point were I could go with either one. > Any sugesstions or recomendations? I know there was a problem with the > early actuators breaking, but did anyone find one that was satisfactory? > All opinions appreciated, > Neal > * > > > *


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:18:24 PM PST US
    From: Alan Daniels <aldaniels@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: Vixen: Nose Dragger Towbar
    If I am going to push a Vixen backwards I need a tow bar. Do NOT push down on the horizontal stab as you risk damage to the electric trim, and the Vixen does not have a handle back there. What I did was modify the front axle so that I could use a modified standard collapsible tow bar. I cut the lugs off the tow bar and welded on smaller rods that would go inside the kitfox axle, then drilled the axle nuts and the yoke so I could safety wire the nuts and do away with the cotter pins that prevented the 1/2 inch rods from going inside the axle. For me it is a must have to steer the plane while backing into the hangar to get it around other planes. Going forward is simple. Tom Jones wrote: > > The "How to Fly a Kitfox" book says the Vixen will "Follow you around like a puppy if you pull it by the prop hub. it seems to me a handle on the rear of the fuselage would make it easy to push around on the ground. > > I put some wheels on a scoop shovel and I just scoop up the tail wheel of my classic 4 with and pull it around even with the wings folded. That might work on a nose wheel too. > Tom Jones > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85917#85917 > > >


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:37:49 PM PST US
    From: Lyle Persels <lpers@mchsi.com>
    Subject: Re: Model 4 engine swap
    Thanks to all who responded to my question about the necessity for FAA blessing my swap from a 912 UL to a 912 ULS. I'll try to respond to each question or comment: Jimmie B.: No I didn't have any concerns about the engine at 450 hours. Everything I know about the engine suggests that it's extremely reliable and trouble free and is likely to perform well far beyond the recommended 1200 hour TBO. I was a bit tired of tinkering with the characteristic low rpm roughness, and I wanted to see what the increased horsepower would do for the already excellent performance. I'm not aware of any expensive repairs that are frequently encountered in higher time 912 UL engines. Jacques V.: Required mods are rather minimal. While the engine mount dimensions are identical, it was necessary to replace the engine mount with a new one with greater wall thickness in the tubing and a couple more diagonal braces. The deeper oil tank along with changed fittings might give you some trouble. I opted to use the oil tank from the old UL rather than modify the cowl and I also found it advantageous to use different oil fittings in a couple of places. Because of my instrumentation, I used the old temperature senders rather than the ones provided with the engine. I had a Warp Drive 70" three-bladed prop. I had to buy a new hub and mounting hardware to fit the revised mounting dimensions. Warp Drive very slightly modified the blade hubs and checked and refurbished the blades at no charge. Good people! Then there were a couple of minor electrical changes and that's about it. John McBean is very helpful with specifics. Finally, with regard to FAA involvement. My FAA registration does list the engine type as Rotax (all). The restrictions on my airworthiness certificate state that in case of changes, I need only comply with FAR Part 43, Appendix 1. Appendix 1, as I read it, defines powerplant major alterations relating to engine alterations, but not to an engine change. Presumably changing one engine for an identical engine would not constitute a powerplant major alteration. Changing from powerplant to another almost identical powerplant when both are classified identically in the FAA registration=97well that's not specifically spelled out and may be subject to varying interpretations by different FSDOs. I'll probably make a call and discuss it with the local office. Thanks to all for your help and suggestions. Lyle On 01 4, 07, at 9:55 AM, Jimmie Blackwell wrote: > Lyle > > I am considering changing my 912UL out for a Jabiru, so would sure > like to know how this turns out. > > My 912UL does not have quiet as many hours as yours but was > wondering if you were starting to have some concerns about it. My > thought is to sell my 912 UL before it starts developing expensive > problems. > > Thank you. > > Jimmie > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lyle Persels" <> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 7:44 AM > Subject: Kitfox-List: Model 4 engine swap > > >> >> I'm nearing completion of replacement of the Rotax 912 UL with a >> 912 ULS in my Model 4. Does this constitute a major change that >> will require a new FAA inspection, signoff, certificate, and test >> period? Or can I just go fly? >> >> Oh, by the way, my old 912 UL with about 440 hours is for sale. >> No price set. What's it worth? >> >> Lyle Persels >> =========== =========== =========== >> >


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:50 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: landing gear shock cord
    When I took off my floats this year and put tube gear back on, I used 5 wraps only. It sits a little low on one side now but it flys fine. If I recall one bungee was 60 inches and the other 64 inches. They are Mil spec bungees and seem ok here. All these Kitfox movies were shot with the 5 wraps only http://www.cfisher.com 3 rd link on left side. I have used 6 before and they are stiffer but the 5 does seem to work. I have flown with me 210 lbs and another 210 pounder and full fuel and never noticed the bungees to be much different other than a softer ride but certainly not mushy. I have no idea what the proper length of the bungees is supposed to be and maybe mine are too short ? Good Luck and get a buddy to help it will make it allot easier. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "pilotpat" <pkelly20@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:57 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: landing gear shock cord > > Hi all, been watching the postings for a month or so now and am new at > this. I have a classic iv kitfox (curently working on) and am doing the > bungee cord landing gear. The book says 6 wraps , but I can only get > Five, Is there some special tool or method or someone with special tips > on how to do this in order to get six wraps? Thanks in advance > > or does anyone have a Grove landing system , they want to get rid of and > make it easy? > > pilotpat > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85913#85913 > > >


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:45:22 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: Norwegian Stalls
    Michel Did you get that post i sent in on this earlier ? Same thing bascially that I found was a thud from the rear. - Disturbed air from the wing hitting the horiz stab ? I only heard this while doing deadstick stalls and headset off. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michel Verheughe" <michel@online.no> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Norwegian Stalls > > On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Michael Gibbs wrote: >> I think we need a picture of Michel in his cockpit with his Viking helmet >> on. :-) > > Ok, I will provide that. > Meanwhile, I went flying today, did some stalls (mush down) and listened > to 'the sound.' > Unfortunately, I'll need to have someone else to fly the plane, in order > to find the cause but, so far, I wonder if it is not my elevator. But > first, a question: Is this correct?: When we stall gently (mush down), the > plane starts stalling the wings first then, if we keep the stick in the > stomach, and provided we get enough elevator authority to get the nose up > and the speed down, the horizontal stab (and the elevator) will stall too, > and the nose will drop. > If this is correct, then I think the noise I experience is happening when > the horizontal stab stalls and the elevator shakes. > Am I getting anywhere? > > Cheers, > Michel > > >


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:46:54 PM PST US
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Subject: Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power.
    I have a 4 way cig adapter under dash on right side and the adapters plug into that for Intercom, radio and GPS.... the Adapter is hard wired into master. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "wingnut" <wingnut@spamarrest.com> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:23 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. I'm adding a PDA GPS to my Model 4 and I'm kind of stuck on how to wire power to the PDA. I have a cigarette lighter adapter for the PDA but I don't really have a good place for a cigarette lighter plug in my panel (not to mention how ugly it would look). Ideally, I'd like to do some kind of permanent setup with the PDA's power cable, tucked and tie wrapped neatly into the rest of the harness. Problem is, the PDA is 5V so I can't just wire it into the buss. I suppose that I can hack the lighter adapter and tie wrap it to the frame somewhere behind the panel but I?Td like something a little more ?~aircraft?T quality. I know there are other PDA users out there so I was wondering if someone had a suggestion. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85932#85932


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:57:20 PM PST US
    From: "QSS" <msm@byterocky.net>
    Subject: Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power.
    I have the Garmin iQue and had similar issues to yourself. In the end I fitted the lighter in behind the dash and fed the supply wire out to the docking station through a small hole in the dash. Looks OK and is a permanent fixture. I can use the lighter for other things such as air compressors, lights etc when camping. Its a good compromise. Regards Graeme ----- Original Message ----- From: "wingnut" <wingnut@spamarrest.com> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 10:23 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. I'm adding a PDA GPS to my Model 4 and I'm kind of stuck on how to wire power to the PDA. I have a cigarette lighter adapter for the PDA but I don't really have a good place for a cigarette lighter plug in my panel (not to mention how ugly it would look). Ideally, I'd like to do some kind of permanent setup with the PDA's power cable, tucked and tie wrapped neatly into the rest of the harness. Problem is, the PDA is 5V so I can't just wire it into the buss. I suppose that I can hack the lighter adapter and tie wrap it to the frame somewhere behind the panel but I?Td like something a little more ?~aircraft?T quality. I know there are other PDA users out there so I was wondering if someone had a suggestion. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85932#85932 --


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    From: "kentk" <kentk25@yahoo.com>
    Lynn Matteson wrote: > I also bought a IV from Texas, without engine or cowl. I settled on a 2200 Jabiru engine and Skyfox cowl after doing a lot of engine research. I'm very well satisfied with the way mine turned out, and its performance, and ease of operation. > > Lynn > Kitfox IV Speedster...Jabiru 2200 > > Lynn, Do you know if anyone has documented the performance of various engines vs. various prop cominations? It would really be nice to help the homebuilder choose which configuration will most likely suit their aircraft and performance preferences. I suspect that such an animal does not exist, unless the EAA might have something along those lines. Regards, Kent -------- kentk25[at]yahoo Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85957#85957


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:06 PM PST US
    From: "mike" <mike@mikegibbard.com>
    Subject: Re: landing gear shock cord
    If you use tie wraps to hold each wrap and cut them when you have all six wraps. I was in the plane and a friend was below . The person below would hold the tension and I would tie the tie wrap and then repeat process. Takes less than a 1/2 hour to do both. Good luck. Mike On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:57:10 -0800, pilotpat wrote > > Hi all, been watching the postings for a month or so now and am new at this. I have a classic iv kitfox (curently working on) and am doing the bungee cord landing gear. The book says 6 wraps , but I can only get Five, Is there some special tool or method or someone with special tips on how to do this in order to get six wraps? Thanks in advance > > or does anyone have a Grove landing system , they want to get rid of and make it easy? > > pilotpat > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85913#85913 > Mike Gibbard REO Bellaire 7953 W old State Rd Central Lake 231-544-5241 Home Office 231-676-3788 Cell Phone 231-544-5015 or 231-533-6114 mike@mikegibbard.com http://www.mikegibbard.com


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:36:22 PM PST US
    From: Malcolmbru@AOL.COM
    Subject: Re: Norwegian Stalls
    every time I drink hot chocolate I get a sharp pain in my eye??


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:39 PM PST US
    From: "ron schick" <roncarolnikko@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: landing gear shock cord
    Jeez my book says seven! It's hard as a rock and a pain to do. One wrap then wedge, next wrap then move wedge, next wrap move wedge, etc... Ron NB Ore >From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com> >To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: landing gear shock cord >Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:41:37 -0500 > > >When I took off my floats this year and put tube gear back on, I used 5 >wraps only. It sits a little low on one side now but it flys fine. If I >recall one bungee was 60 inches and the other 64 inches. They are Mil spec >bungees and seem ok here. All these Kitfox movies were shot with the 5 >wraps only http://www.cfisher.com 3 rd link on left side. > >I have used 6 before and they are stiffer but the 5 does seem to work. I >have flown with me 210 lbs and another 210 pounder and full fuel and never >noticed the bungees to be much different other than a softer ride but >certainly not mushy. I have no idea what the proper length of the bungees >is supposed to be and maybe mine are too short ? > > >Good Luck and get a buddy to help it will make it allot easier. > > >Dave > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "pilotpat" <pkelly20@comcast.net> >To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> >Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:57 PM >Subject: Kitfox-List: landing gear shock cord > > >> >>Hi all, been watching the postings for a month or so now and am new at >>this. I have a classic iv kitfox (curently working on) and am doing the >>bungee cord landing gear. The book says 6 wraps , but I can only get >>Five, Is there some special tool or method or someone with special tips >>on how to do this in order to get six wraps? Thanks in advance >> >>or does anyone have a Grove landing system , they want to get rid of and >>make it easy? >> >>pilotpat >> >> >> >> >>Read this topic online here: >> >>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85913#85913 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ Fixing up the home? Live Search can help


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:50 PM PST US
    From: Mdkitfox@AOL.COM
    Subject: Re: Rear spar attach reinforcement
    Kent, After viewing the picture I would recommend remaking the attach bracket. While the one you made would 'probably' be okay, why take a chance. They're cheap parts and easier to do now rather than later. I used the 'cuff' thinking they would be an improvement, but the original design has never been an issue. I have a model V and probably have the original spar reinforcement pieces, but I recently moved and finding them may take a while. If you want them (and I can find them) they're yours, no charge. Does anyone know if the Series V(1400 lbs version) part is the same as the model IV part? Rick Series V Speedster - N39RW


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:53:18 PM PST US
    From: "Lowell Fitt" <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power.
    Just a thought here. This may not be significant for you. There was a post in the Lancair list some time ago about using PDAs and Laptops in airplanes. It seems that if the memory is hard drive based, there isn't enough air pressure to keep the read/write arm on the hard drive from coming in contact with the drive disk above about 10,000 ft. Several guys reported disk crashes - destroyed the disk - in their personal experience. I found that an IPOD that I intended to use to record the sometimes crazy air to air talk in our group trips would crash predictably on every trip We were often at or above 10,000 ft.. The stated altitude limit is 10,000 ft. and is a hard drive problem. If your PDA has solid State memory or if your not flying in the Western third of the US - probably no problem. Most Ipod users will find that after a return to a lower altitude, the thing works normally again. Lowell ----- Original Message ----- From: "wingnut" <wingnut@spamarrest.com> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 4:23 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Question for PDA GPS users: Hooking up power. > > I'm adding a PDA GPS to my Model 4 and I'm kind of stuck on how to wire > power to the PDA. I have a cigarette lighter adapter for the PDA but I > don't really have a good place for a cigarette lighter plug in my panel > (not to mention how ugly it would look). Ideally, I'd like to do some kind > of permanent setup with the PDA's power cable, tucked and tie wrapped > neatly into the rest of the harness. Problem is, the PDA is 5V so I can't > just wire it into the buss. I suppose that I can hack the lighter adapter > and tie wrap it to the frame somewhere behind the panel but I?Td like > something a little more ?~aircraft?T quality. > > I know there are other PDA users out there so I was wondering if someone > had a suggestion. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=85932#85932 > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --