Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:57 AM - Re: Source code in posts - Off topic (Larry/Cathy Boone)
2. 02:01 AM - Re: Best prop was: Fuel consumption based on gallons per hour (avtar412)
3. 06:37 AM - Bubble Doors for Sale - Central CA (Tinne maha)
4. 10:33 AM - Test Disregaurd (Brad Martin)
5. 10:33 AM - Test Disregaurd (Brad Martin)
6. 01:13 PM - Re: Best prop was: Fuel consumption based on gallons per hour (kitfoxmike)
7. 04:43 PM - Re: Airport access update, I got a key (Lowell Fitt)
8. 05:20 PM - Re: Airport access update, I got a key (Noel Loveys)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Source code in posts - Off topic |
Do not archive
Steve,
I'm not sure I should try to explain myself one more time, but since I did
not mean to offend in my "No Problemo"comment, I will.
To understand my comment, you must consider the context. If you read the
third sentence and following, my intention is clearly stated.I was just
trying to explain in "no problemo" the initial normal "first impression"
human response to input from our five senses; in this case visual. The point
intended was--my first visual impression of a message can influence my
opinion of the content of the message. If my first impression is good, this
influences my opinion of the message in a positive way. If bad, it
influences my opinion in a negative way. My intent was to encourage you (or
the writer) to give a good impression when someone glances at the content of
your message. If there was a "simple fix" to do that, I believe most people
would want to do that and I hope you would want to.
However, after reading your response, if would appear that you are looking
for reasons to be offended. Please look closely at your response to what I
thought was plain language. You said, " you imply the writer is garbage."
But I stated, "if the message looks like garbage it could very well be
garbage and/or the source of it is a producer of garbage." Notice closely
that the "is a producer of garbage" is not the same as saying the person is
garbage. Do you see the difference? I hope so. Compare that with this
statement. If a weld looks bad, it probably is bad. If the welder
consistently produces bad welds, I could say he is a producer of bad welds.
That is not the same as saying he is a bad weld.
I have called no one "garbage" nor has my comment been rude in context,
maybe crude, but not rude. But I have tried to encourage you (or the writer)
to put a little more effort into producing positive first impressions of
your messages. Indulge me one more example to illustrate the concept of
first impressions. Maybe you have heard the saying, "you eat with your eyes
first." A beautifully set table and attractively arranged dishes/food
prepares the mind to anticipate a wonderful tasting meal. The above does not
guarantee good tasting food. However, food sloped on a table almost
guarantees a negative opinion of the taste of the food before eating.
I trust this explanation was satisfactory. I intended no offense.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Kitfoxv@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Source code in posts - Off topic
>
> You also have the option to go to the original site of the post and read
> it in plain language, exactly as posted. The poster is not sending you
> e-mail, the server is. If that facility is not capable of sending accurate
> copies, why do YOU use it .(e-mail) ..and why do you rag on the original
> writer?
> I repeat...the writer\poster is not sending it to your personal e-mail
> box. Get it?? Duh...?
> You still didn't explain your crude, rude and statement.....
>
> "if the message looks like garbage it could very well be garbage and/or
> the
> source of it is a producer of garbage."
>
> You imply the writer is garbage.
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best prop was: Fuel consumption based on gallons per |
hour
I have a 72" WD on Kitfox 5 (heavy at 335kgs) and get 100kts and 1700fpm climb
with just me on board (70kgs). Subaru EA81 Turbo. I'm a sure fan of WD
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102608#102608
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Bubble Doors for Sale - Central CA |
I have an un-touched set of LP Aero bubble doors for sale. After seeing
they would add about 4 pounds to my plane, I decided they are too heavy for
my taste.
If someone who isn't so picky about weight would like to buy them, I will
sell for $195/Door + shipping.
Warning: Shipping is expensive due to package size (~$100+ via UPS), so if
you are anywhere near Central CA, let's see if we can find someone who will
be traveling through & has room.
Contact me off list if interested.
Grant Krueger
San Luis Obispo, CA
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft Office
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
test
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:28 PM
Subject: Kitfox-List: Airport access update, I got a key
>
> A couple months ago I asked on the list for help about being denied access
> to our local airport. I wrote a letter to the airport advisory board and
> included the refrences from the FAA I received from a couple list members
> and a few other ideas too.
>
> last week the board looked into this and surprise, surprise. The policy
> already exists for people with airplanes on trailes to be issued a gate
> key.
>
> I went in to see the airport manager today and she issued me a key, no
> problem.
>
> Thanks all!!
> Tom Jones
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102568#102568
>
>
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
test
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:28 PM
Subject: Kitfox-List: Airport access update, I got a key
>
> A couple months ago I asked on the list for help about being denied access
> to our local airport. I wrote a letter to the airport advisory board and
> included the refrences from the FAA I received from a couple list members
> and a few other ideas too.
>
> last week the board looked into this and surprise, surprise. The policy
> already exists for people with airplanes on trailes to be issued a gate
> key.
>
> I went in to see the airport manager today and she issued me a key, no
> problem.
>
> Thanks all!!
> Tom Jones
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102568#102568
>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best prop was: Fuel consumption based on gallons per |
hour
I would like to see a comparison between the WD and the IVO.
--------
kitfoxmike
model IV, 1200
speedster
912ul
Do not archive
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102668#102668
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Airport access update, I got a key |
Tom,
What I got out of this discussion was your words of caution regarding your
plan to go through the procedures in a systematic fashion, asking for their
help, not with pressure or threat from you and then the good outcome. Glad
to hear that bureaucrats oftentimes have hearts.
Lowell
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:28 PM
Subject: Kitfox-List: Airport access update, I got a key
>
> A couple months ago I asked on the list for help about being denied access
> to our local airport. I wrote a letter to the airport advisory board and
> included the refrences from the FAA I received from a couple list members
> and a few other ideas too.
>
> last week the board looked into this and surprise, surprise. The policy
> already exists for people with airplanes on trailes to be issued a gate
> key.
>
> I went in to see the airport manager today and she issued me a key, no
> problem.
>
> Thanks all!!
> Tom Jones
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102568#102568
>
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Airport access update, I got a key |
I'm not sure but I think I'm losing my trust in bureaucracy's ability to
mess things up.
Thanks for the good news.
Noel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Jones
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:58 PM
> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Kitfox-List: Airport access update, I got a key
>
>
>
> A couple months ago I asked on the list for help about being
> denied access to our local airport. I wrote a letter to the
> airport advisory board and included the refrences from the
> FAA I received from a couple list members and a few other ideas too.
>
> last week the board looked into this and surprise, surprise.
> The policy already exists for people with airplanes on
> trailes to be issued a gate key.
>
> I went in to see the airport manager today and she issued me
> a key, no problem.
>
> Thanks all!!
> Tom Jones
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=102568#102568
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|