Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Sun 08/26/07


Total Messages Posted: 21



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:32 AM - Re: 582 Fireward Forward for Sale (JC Propellerdesign)
     2. 03:53 AM - Re: Puff The Magic Taildragger (Dave G.)
     3. 04:24 AM - Re: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin (Harold Flynn)
     4. 05:06 AM - BMW (JC Propellerdesign)
     5. 05:08 AM - Re: Puff The Magic Taildragger (JC Propellerdesign)
     6. 05:10 AM - Re: Series 7 Wt & Balance ()
     7. 07:10 AM - Re: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin (Noel Loveys)
     8. 07:11 AM - Re: New Rotax 912-S Running Rough... (JetPilot)
     9. 07:15 AM - Re: Series 7 Wt & Balance (Noel Loveys)
    10. 11:10 AM - Re: Series 7 Wt & Balance ()
    11. 11:29 AM - Re:BMW 1100S (Ron Liebmann)
    12. 11:38 AM - video link to kitfox float flying (akflyer)
    13. 12:00 PM - Re: BMW 1100s  (GONER752@AOL.COM)
    14. 12:08 PM - Central TX Kitfox I for sale; Question (Jack L Bell)
    15. 12:22 PM - Re: BMW 1100s  (GONER752@aol.com)
    16. 12:46 PM - Re: BMW 1100s  (JC Propellerdesign)
    17. 01:14 PM - Re: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin (John W. Hart)
    18. 01:14 PM - Re: Central TX Kitfox I for sale; Question (akflyer)
    19. 02:41 PM - good source for 582 cranks (akflyer)
    20. 03:23 PM - Kitfox/582 coolant bleeding (john beirne)
    21. 06:36 PM - Re: Wing Specs?? (Keithc)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:32:09 AM PST US
    From: "JC Propellerdesign" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: Re: 582 Fireward Forward for Sale
    The BMW 1100S is a modern engine that don't cost a lot, modern electronic injection, cheep on fuel, cheep to buy, 85-90 useful HP (depending on RPM) the torque is almost constant, I have pic from a guy in Poland that replaced his VW 1835 with a BMW he more then doubled the climb rate. speed up to VNE on his dragy TULAK (highwing side by side plane, MTOW 450 kg / 1000 lbs) The pic is big is size so if any one want to see I can send to your private mail. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave G. To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 7:35 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 582 Fireward Forward for Sale Hello Mark. It's amazing how close your FWF is to my own. Almost identical. In any case I'd be very interested in performance numbers on your new engine package. I have a mid-time 582 also and would like to replace it come rebuild time. The HKS is one option, the 912 is the other as the Jabiru dealers here in Canada have proved unreliable. I suspect the HKS might come close to the Jabiru in some respects with it's lower prop RPM. What model are you flying? Napier, Mark wrote: >I've bought an HKS 700e and want to start making a motor mount for it. >I'm flying on my 582 but want to sell it outright or part it out. I >hate to do it now that good flying weather is coming but have to >sometime. > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:53:45 AM PST US
    From: "Dave G." <occom@ns.sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Re: Puff The Magic Taildragger
    Might be, you were the only one there. My BMW motorcycle always seeps oil past the rings if I park on the sidestand unless I tip it away from that side for a few seconds while parking. The smoke cloud is amazing. Dave Goddard- Mod IV 1050/582 do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: jeff puls To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:14 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Puff The Magic Taildragger I went out to the airport to fly the Fox the other night. I have the 912UL. I have not flown in over a month and a half. I removed my oil cap to cycle the prop through. The prop seemed to be frozen. In the past I have removed a plug and let the oil seep out as I was cranking the engine and it locked. Anyway, while I was standing there I leaned on the prop as it was at the horizontal. Ever so lightly I leaned on the prop and applied a little constant pressure and it cycled through. I continued to cycle the prop and after what seemed like a short period of time (Less than normal) it did the customary "Gurgle." I started the engine and got a bunch of smoke coming from my exhaust. It seemed to do it for about 200' and then it stopped. It looked like I was spraying for misquitos. I went ahead and flew and the engine ran perfect. I assume that I had some oil in one of the cylinders when it seemed to be locked. Does anyone concur with that. I don't think I bent a rod because it ran perfect as it always does. It hasn't belched or f _ _ ted in 300 hours. Jeff Classic IV


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:24:43 AM PST US
    From: Harold Flynn <hflynn46531@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin
    When building my S5 in 1996 I talked to the tec. department at skystar about the forward wing spar bolts. They told me that the wings had a forward lifting force on them and in theory in level flight the bolts could be removed and the wings would remain in place. How about that!!! The operative word there I think is, "practically" . The only load at all is shear but you are right that is minimal. No doubt the clevis pin could be a lot smaller and still do the job. For the reason you give, pilot confidence, if the cad plating ever wears off my pins I'll replace them. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > kenneth schooley > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 6:00 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > > > > > Just a quick note regarding the wing retaining pins, I was > told as an Avid > Flyer salesman. That there is practically NO shear on these > pins. Because of > the location of the wing lift struts at the lower pivot > point, the pin has > approx. 18 lbs. forward load at nominal cruise (there is virtually no > rearward load). The reason for the size of this pin is for > pilot confidence, > not necessarily for strength. The most loading will occur > during landing > configuration or ground movement. > > > > Thanks, Ken > > > >From: "Noel Loveys" > >To: > >Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > Date: Fri, 24 Aug > >2007 22:37:42 -0230 > > > >That's because clevis pins are usually used in moving shear > applications > >e.g. axels for pulleys. The application on the 'Fox and the > Avid is a > >static shear application. Because I fold my wings after > every flight I > >keep > >an eye peeled on the condition of the clevis pin and if it > ever gets to the > >point where the cad plate is worn through I'll replace them. > > > > > > > > > > > >Noel Loveys, RPP, AME intern > >Campbellton, Newfoundland, > >Canada > >Kitfox Mod III-A, 582, B box, Ivo IFA > >Aerocet 1100s > > noelloveys@yahoo.ca > > > > > >Do not archive > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > > > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > > > Lynn Matteson > > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:27 PM > > > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're welcome, John. > > > > > > I was gonna add this part earlier, but figured you didn't need > > > another thing to worry about. Now that you've got a few > hours older > > > (joke), I think you can handle it. In Spruce's description of the > > > clevis pins, it says: "Used with clevis forks and in secondary > > > controls which are not subjected to continuous operation." Makes > > > you wonder, doesn't it? :) > > > > > > Lynn Matteson > > > Grass Lake, Michigan > > > Kitfox IV Speedster w/Jabiru 2200 > > > flying w/395+ hrs > > > do not archive > > > > > > > > > On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:42 AM, John W. Hart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Lynn. I have a Model IV also, and I was pretty > sure I had > > > > the right > > > > critter, but I don't like guessing when it comes to parts as > > > > critical as > > > > these. I bought the aircraft already built, and have a > lot of the > > > > paperwork, but couldn't locate anything telling me EXACTLY > > > what the > > > > pin is. > > > > I appreciate the help. > > > > John Hart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ><< Signature1.jpg >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! > http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us > > > > > > --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:06:53 AM PST US
    From: "JC Propellerdesign" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: BMW
    I will check with the friend from Poland, how many hours they have on this engine's, he just installed his, but have installed many on others plane inkl the school plane, he is also the one that got the bmw electronic box to work on airplane, there is 3 different manufactures of gear box, Poland, Czechoslovakia and Germany, he recommend the Cz gear box The BMW 1100S is a modern engine that don't cost a lot, modern electronic injection, cheep on fuel, cheep to buy, 85-90 useful HP (depending on RPM) the torque is almost constant, I have pic from a guy in Poland that replaced his VW 1835 with a BMW he more then doubled the climb rate. speed up to VNE on his dragy TULAK (highwing side by side plane, MTOW 450 kg / 1000 lbs) The pic is big is size so if any one want to see I can send to your private mail. Jan DATA OF ALL ENGINES R 1100/1150 SERIES (I PUT ONLY USEFULLY PARAMETERS, SKIP VALVE TRAIN GEOMETRY, CLEARANCES AND CONTROL DIMENSIONS, THIS IS TASK FOR EXPERIENCED SERVICEMAN) ): FOR ALL ENGINES R 1100 SERIES: Idle speed 1000...1150 min-1 Effective displacement 1085 cm3 Engine oil, 20W-50 (BMW NUMBER: 81 22 9 407 685) Compression test pressure Good min 10 bar Normal 8.5...10 bar Poor max 8.5 bar Valve clearances Engine cold max 35 =B0C Inlet 0.15 mm Exhaust 0.3 mm BMW R 1100GS, R 1100R, Compression ratio 10.3 : 1 Nominal output At engine rpm 6750 min-1 59 kW Max. torque At engine rpm 5250 min-1 97 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7800 min-1 Permissible continuous engine speed max 7600 min-1 BMW R 1100RS Compression ratio 10.3 : 1 Nominal output At engine rpm 7250 min-1 66 kW Max. torque At engine rpm 5500 min-1 95 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7900 min-1 Permissible continuous engine speed max 7600 min-1 BMW R 1100RT Compression ratio 10.7:1 Nominal output At engine rpm 7250 min-1 66 kW Max. torque at engine rpm 5500 min-1 95 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7900 min-1 Permissible continuous engine speed max 7600 min-1 BMW R 1100S Engine - compression ratio 11.3:1 Engine - nominal output At engine rpm 7500 min-1 72 kW Engine - max. torque At engine rpm 5750 min-1 97 Nm Engine - maximum permissible speed 8210 min-1 FOR ALL ENGINES R 1150 SERIES: Idle speed 1100+/-50 min-1 Cylinder bore 101 mm Piston stroke 70.5 mm Effective displacement 1130 cm3 Engine oil, 20W-50 (BMW NUMBER: 81 22 9 407 685) Compression test pressure Good min 10 bar Normal 8.5...10 bar Poor max 8.5 bar Valve clearances Engine cold max 35 =B0C Inlet 0.15 mm Exhaust 0.3 mm BMW R 1150GS, 1150GS Adventure, 1150R, 1150 R Rockster, Compression ratio 10.3 : 1 Nominal output at engine rpm 6750 min-1 62.5 kW Max. torque at engine rpm 5250 min-1 98 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7900 min-1 BMW R 1150 RS: Compression ratio 11.3:1 Nominal output At engine rpm 7250 min-1 70 kW Max. torque At engine rpm 5500 min-1 100 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7900 min-1 BMW R 1150 RT Compression ratio 11.3:1 Nominal output at engine rpm 7250 min-1 70 kW Max. torque at engine rpm 5500 min-1 100 Nm Maximum permissible engine speed 7900 min-1


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:39 AM PST US
    From: "JC Propellerdesign" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: Re: Puff The Magic Taildragger
    That will be a problem on kitfox with BMW or Rotax when having a central monowheel installed. //unknown :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave G. To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:53 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Puff The Magic Taildragger Might be, you were the only one there. My BMW motorcycle always seeps oil past the rings if I park on the sidestand unless I tip it away from that side for a few seconds while parking. The smoke cloud is amazing. Dave Goddard- Mod IV 1050/582 do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: jeff puls To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:14 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Puff The Magic Taildragger I went out to the airport to fly the Fox the other night. I have the 912UL. I have not flown in over a month and a half. I removed my oil cap to cycle the prop through. The prop seemed to be frozen. In the past I have removed a plug and let the oil seep out as I was cranking the engine and it locked. Anyway, while I was standing there I leaned on the prop as it was at the horizontal. Ever so lightly I leaned on the prop and applied a little constant pressure and it cycled through. I continued to cycle the prop and after what seemed like a short period of time (Less than normal) it did the customary "Gurgle." I started the engine and got a bunch of smoke coming from my exhaust. It seemed to do it for about 200' and then it stopped. It looked like I was spraying for misquitos. I went ahead and flew and the engine ran perfect. I assume that I had some oil in one of the cylinders when it seemed to be locked. Does anyone concur with that. I don't think I bent a rod because it ran perfect as it always does. It hasn't belched or f _ _ ted in 300 hours. Jeff Classic IV href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matron href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:10:53 AM PST US
    From: <frank.phyllis@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Series 7 Wt & Balance
    Noel Yes, leveled IAW instructions. Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Noel Loveys Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 4:03 PM Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance Did you have your tail wheel raised up to level the plane? Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > frank.phyllis@mindspring.com > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:41 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > > All > I just completed (I hope) the wt & balance for my Series 7 > with a Rotax, > i.e. no fwd sweep in wing. > > Wt came out to be 822 -- I'm happy with that. > > What I'm questioning is the wheel measurements. > I dropped the wing leading edge (datum) and found it to be to the rear > of the main wheel axles by 2 3/8". (I actually had to drop the string > outside the main wheels because the string was touching the Grove Gear > leading edge.) The diagram/worksheet shows the wing leading > edge to be > fwd of the main wheels. > > Tail wheel was 164" behind leading edge. > > What wheel measurements have you found on your S7? > > Frank McDonald > N5929 > Hopefully, ready for DAR > > > > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:10:43 AM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin
    I don't disbelieve it, especially if the air velocity over the wing is constant. I'm not going to try it...U first!! ;-) Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Harold Flynn Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 8:54 AM Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin When building my S5 in 1996 I talked to the tec. department at skystar about the forward wing spar bolts. They told me that the wings had a forward lifting force on them and in theory in level flight the bolts could be removed and the wings would remain in place. How about that!!! Noel Loveys <noelloveys@yahoo.ca> wrote: The operative word there I think is, "practically" . The only load at all is shear but you are right that is minimal. No doubt the clevis pin could be a lot smaller and still do the job. For the reason you give, pilot confidence, if the cad plating ever wears off my pins I'll replace them. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > kenneth schooley > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 6:00 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > > > > > Just a quick note regarding the wing retaining pins, I was > told as an Avid > Flyer salesman. That there is practically NO shear on these > pins. Because of > the location of the wing lift struts at the lower pivot > point, the pin has > approx. 18 lbs. forward load at nominal cruise (there is virtually no > rearward load). The reason for the size of this pin is for > pilot confidence, > not necessarily for strength. The most loading will occur > during landing > configuration or ground movement. > > > > Thanks, Ken > > > >From: "Noel Loveys" > >To: > >Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > Date: Fri, 24 Aug > >2007 22:37:42 -0230 > > > >That's because clevis pins are usually used in moving shear > applications > >e.g. axels for pulleys. The application on the 'Fox and the > Avid is a > >static shear application. Because I fold my wings after > every flight I > >keep > >an eye peeled on the condition of the clevis pin and if it > ever gets to the > >point where the cad plate is worn through I'll replace them. > > > > > > > > > > > >Noel Loveys, RPP, AME intern > >Campbellton, Newfoundland, > >Canada > >Kitfox Mod III-A, 582, B box, Ivo IFA > >Aerocet 1100s > > noelloveys@yahoo.ca > > > > > >Do not archive > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > > > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > > > Lynn Matteson > > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:27 PM > > > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're welcome, John. > > > > > > I was gonna add this part earlier, but figured you didn't need > > > another thing to worry about. Now that you've got a few > hours older > > > (joke), I think you can handle it. In Spruce's description of the > > > clevis pins, it says: "Used with clevis forks and in secondary > > > controls which are not subjected to continuous operation." Makes > > > you wonder, doesn't it? :) > > > > > > Lynn Matteson > > > Grass Lake, Michigan > > > Kitfox IV Speedster w/Jabiru 2200 > > > flying w/395+ hrs > > > do not archive > > > > > > > > > On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:42 AM, John W. Hart wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Lynn. I have a Model IV also, and I was pretty > sure I had > > > > the right > > > > critter, but I don't like guessing when it comes to parts as >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:15 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: New Rotax 912-S Running Rough...
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    I dont think its a fuel pressure problem, as its been running lean until I changed the needle position. Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131056#131056


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:29 AM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Series 7 Wt & Balance
    I thought it over after I made the last post and can't find anything wrong with the mains being so close to the Datum. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > frank.phyllis@mindspring.com > Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:40 AM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > > Noel > Yes, leveled IAW instructions. > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > Noel Loveys > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 4:03 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > Did you have your tail wheel raised up to level the plane? > > Noel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > > frank.phyllis@mindspring.com > > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:41 PM > > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > Subject: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > > > > > > All > > I just completed (I hope) the wt & balance for my Series 7 > > with a Rotax, > > i.e. no fwd sweep in wing. > > > > Wt came out to be 822 -- I'm happy with that. > > > > What I'm questioning is the wheel measurements. > > I dropped the wing leading edge (datum) and found it to be > to the rear > > of the main wheel axles by 2 3/8". (I actually had to drop > the string > > outside the main wheels because the string was touching the > Grove Gear > > leading edge.) The diagram/worksheet shows the wing leading > > edge to be > > fwd of the main wheels. > > > > Tail wheel was 164" behind leading edge. > > > > What wheel measurements have you found on your S7? > > > > Frank McDonald > > N5929 > > Hopefully, ready for DAR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:10:08 AM PST US
    From: <frank.phyllis@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Series 7 Wt & Balance
    Thanks, Noel Frank Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Noel Loveys Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:13 AM Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance I thought it over after I made the last post and can't find anything wrong with the mains being so close to the Datum. Noel > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > frank.phyllis@mindspring.com > Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:40 AM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > > Noel > Yes, leveled IAW instructions. > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > Noel Loveys > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 4:03 PM > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > Did you have your tail wheel raised up to level the plane? > > Noel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com > > [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of > > frank.phyllis@mindspring.com > > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:41 PM > > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > Subject: Kitfox-List: Series 7 Wt & Balance > > > > > > > > All > > I just completed (I hope) the wt & balance for my Series 7 > > with a Rotax, > > i.e. no fwd sweep in wing. > > > > Wt came out to be 822 -- I'm happy with that. > > > > What I'm questioning is the wheel measurements. > > I dropped the wing leading edge (datum) and found it to be > to the rear > > of the main wheel axles by 2 3/8". (I actually had to drop > the string > > outside the main wheels because the string was touching the > Grove Gear > > leading edge.) The diagram/worksheet shows the wing leading > > edge to be > > fwd of the main wheels. > > > > Tail wheel was 164" behind leading edge. > > > > What wheel measurements have you found on your S7? > > > > Frank McDonald > > N5929 > > Hopefully, ready for DAR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:29:24 AM PST US
    From: "Ron Liebmann" <rliebmann@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re:BMW 1100S
    Hi Jan, I have been looking at the BMW 1200 for some time now. 115hp on a Rotax gearbox looks great. Send me your 1100 picture if you will. Thanks much, Ron N55KF ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 3:31 AM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 582 Fireward Forward for Sale The BMW 1100S is a modern engine that don't cost a lot, modern electronic injection, cheep on fuel, cheep to buy, 85-90 useful HP (depending on RPM) the torque is almost constant, I have pic from a guy in Poland that replaced his VW 1835 with a BMW he more then doubled the climb rate. speed up to VNE on his dragy TULAK (highwing side by side plane, MTOW 450 kg / 1000 lbs) The pic is big is size so if any one want to see I can send to your private mail. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave G. To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 7:35 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: 582 Fireward Forward for Sale Hello Mark. It's amazing how close your FWF is to my own. Almost identical. In any case I'd be very interested in performance numbers on your new engine package. I have a mid-time 582 also and would like to replace it come rebuild time. The HKS is one option, the 912 is the other as the Jabiru dealers here in Canada have proved unreliable. I suspect the HKS might come close to the Jabiru in some respects with it's lower prop RPM. What model are you flying? Napier, Mark wrote: >I've bought an HKS 700e and want to start making a motor mount for it. >I'm flying on my 582 but want to sell it outright or part it out. I >hate to do it now that good flying weather is coming but have to >sometime. > > p; Features Subscriptions href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matron ====================== bsp; available via href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:38:14 AM PST US
    Subject: video link to kitfox float flying
    From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHPp3jUyyQo A short clip of some flying from a couple weeks ago. The long take off run was to put me in front of the cammera at lift off so I could see how bad the heels were digging on takeoff so I could re-rig the floats if needed. That is when I just ended up swapping to the full lotus floats, but as you can see the heels were dragging just a bit. 1 more degree on the wing and she would have been better. -------- Leonard Perry Soldotna AK Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV 582 IVO IFA Full Lotus 1260 95% complete Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131084#131084


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:00:54 PM PST US
    From: GONER752@AOL.COM
    Subject: Re: Kitfox-List:BMW 1100s
    Jan, Please send along the pic. you have. Also, any spec's? engine weight,dual ignition,etc. And possibly where to look for the stand alone engine. Thanks, Greg G. Macedon, N.Y. 23NK n375KL Mod 2 582 http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:08:16 PM PST US
    From: Jack L Bell <jack@comconn.com>
    Subject: Central TX Kitfox I for sale; Question
    I'm not certain whether this is appropriate or not, but this morning I pulled my kitfox I (582 gray head.. like me..) out of the hangar, added back a bit of gas (can't leave gas in with one wing folded- I *know* this for a fact..), pre-flighted, warmed her up, and shot a few landings. Still as good-natured as ever. Flies great, and I have the doors off again.. nothing like it. I have the plane on barnstormers: http://www.barnstormers.com/listing.php?mode=usersearch&user=n79jw and I'm somewhat dismayed at the low number of queries I've received. Do I say something in the ad that might put folks off? She's a great plane- but one plane is more than enough to occupy my spare time. Any suggestions would be appreciated! -Jack Kitfox I; Rotax 582; GSC prop Avid Mk IV; jabiru 2200; prince prop


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:22:29 PM PST US
    From: GONER752@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Kitfox-List:BMW 1100s
    Jan, I should have read my mail further as I see you had already posted further info. At 170+ pounds, this doesn't look like a likely alternative for my model 2. Looks like the 2200 Jab. still tops my wish list.Thanks again, Greg G. Macedon, N.Y. 23NK n375KL Mod 2 582 do not archive http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:46:39 PM PST US
    From: "JC Propellerdesign" <propellerdesign@tele2.se>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox-List:BMW 1100s
    I think it is a good alternative to R 80 hp Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: GONER752@aol.com To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:22 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List:BMW 1100s Jan, I should have read my mail further as I see you had already posted further info. At 170+ pounds, this doesn't look like a likely alternative for my model 2. Looks like the 2200 Jab. still tops my wish list.Thanks again, Greg G. Macedon, N.Y. 23NK n375KL Mod 2 582 do not archive ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- lcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982" href="http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000 000982" target="_blank">AOL.com.


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:14:26 PM PST US
    From: "John W. Hart" <akanka@kiamichiwb.org>
    Subject: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin
    I don't think I want to personally test that theory! ;<) John Hart -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Harold Flynn Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 6:24 AM To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Leading Edge Spar Retaining Pin When building my S5 in 1996 I talked to the tec. department at skystar about the forward wing spar bolts. They told me that the wings had a forward lifting force on them and in theory in level flight the bolts could be removed and the wings would remain in place. How about that!!!


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:14:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Central TX Kitfox I for sale; Question
    From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
    nothing in the add that wouls make me run the other way... but most folks who are looking for a KF are probably going to be looking for a newer model... Just my .02. If I were looking for a good time builder, this would be a great one to have! -------- Leonard Perry Soldotna AK Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV 582 IVO IFA Full Lotus 1260 95% complete Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131097#131097


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:41:09 PM PST US
    Subject: good source for 582 cranks
    From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
    http://www.tmracing.ca/listing.php?itemID=7906 I got my new 582 crank from these guys. fast shipping and ya cant beat the deal. 500.00 for a new in the box mod 99 crank. He had a shelf full of them when I called as he had purchased a large quantity from Rotax. It ened up being cheaper to just pay the core and not send my old crank back as shipping would have cost more than the return.. I am not sure the mark up on parts for the aircraft dealers, but rotax snowmachine dealers get one heck of a mark up.. they ATLEAST double the money on parts sales. Just a heads up to anyone who is getting close to a crank replacment.. -------- Leonard Perry Soldotna AK Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV 582 IVO IFA Full Lotus 1260 95% complete Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131106#131106


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:23:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Kitfox/582 coolant bleeding
    From: "john beirne" <jmcb@oceanfree.net>
    I changed the coolant hoses that run to the cabin heater on my 582 engined fox and then refilled the system with coolant and bled the system at the vent on top of the thermostat until the coolant ran through, however now the engine overheats! Both rads get hot evenly over all their surfaces so I dont think any air is trapped inside those I even placed the tail wheel on a barrel to ensure the cylinder head was level and prevent air entrapment inside the head while filling and bleeding What am I missing? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131112#131112


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:36:01 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing Specs??
    From: "Keithc" <keith@intev.ca>
    Tom, Thanks for the reply. I will be doing a bit more measuring very soon. I would like to hear from a series 5 builder as to the part number comparison or if possible maybe receive some drawings for comparison . The strut diameter has me wondering?? Regards, Keith Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=131135#131135




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --