Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:07 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (Was: KF 3 or KF 4) (Steve Shinabery)
     2. 06:39 AM - Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (Paul Seehafer)
     3. 07:18 AM - Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (dave)
     4. 07:48 AM - Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (john oakley)
     5. 09:40 AM - Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (john taylor)
     6. 01:16 PM - Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (dave)
     7. 04:18 PM - Primer installation 912UL (Gary)
     8. 05:25 PM - Re: Primer installation 912UL (wingnut)
     9. 06:02 PM - Re: Re: Primer installation 912UL (RAY Gignac)
    10. 06:15 PM - Re: Re: Primer installation 912UL (john oakley)
    11. 08:02 PM - Re: Primer installation 912UL (Gary)
    12. 08:22 PM - Re: Re: Primer installation 912UL and Starting (SOURDOSTAN@aol.com)
    13. 08:23 PM - Need a Rotax 912 Exhaust system for a Speedster Model IV (Paul Morel)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? (Was: KF 3 or KF 4) | 
      
      
      I belive that both planes are great..the same but different..just like a 
      FORD vs CHEVY.same but different. :-) different strokes for different 
      folks..kitfox +avid are like brothers.they are side by side..Steve 
      Shinabery N554KF KF2  582 165TT for now
      
      Michael Gibbs wrote:
      >
      >> ...I'm at a loss to understand why you believe the bulk of the design 
      >> credit should not go to Dean.
      >
      > I never said it shouldn't.  I said that the events that played out 
      > were due to the interaction between Denney's desire for a new airplane 
      > and Wilson's design skills and that both ingredients were necessary.
      >
      >> Dan would have collaborated on the design, but a brilliant conceptual 
      >> idea on paper is just that. Design brilliance is the process that 
      >> ultimately takes great ideas from paper to fruition. Each has it's 
      >> place in bringing product to market of course but, since both are 
      >> necessary to make 1+1=2, I see neither as more important or 
      >> significant than the other in Flyer development.
      >
      > That was exactly my point.
      >
      >> Either way, don't know, don't care. I am simply forever grateful 
      >> these two stars collided.
      >
      > I agree.
      >
      > Mike G.
      > N728KF
      > Phoenix, AZ
      >
      >
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? | 
      
      Deke,
      
      I'm glad to know someone is enjoying all this Avid / Kitfox history banter. 
      (smile)
      
      I doubt any of us will ever know what would (or wouldn't?) have happend if 
      Dan and Dean never had that discussion about building an ultralight?  But 
      assuming Denney at minimum provided the catalyst to get Deans creative 
      juices flowing, which ultimately resulted in the creation of the 1st Avid 
      Flyer, he certainly deserves some credit.  But not as an aircraft designer. 
      Aside from the Thunder Mustang, to my knowledge Dan never created any "new" 
      airplanes.  Rather, he just kept modifying the existing Kitfox design.  And 
      for the later Kitfox re-designs, I believe he involved engineers (like when 
      the III was re-engineered into the IV).  And I could be wrong, but I'd bet 
      the Thunder Mustang was mostly a contracted design & build (using 
      professional engineers).  It was way too complex of an airplane for your 
      average self taught tube and fabric airplane designer to come up with. 
      Especially considering the high technology composite construction and 
      molding processes used.  But I'm sure the idea to create a scaled down 
      homebuilt Mustang was his. I'd be the first to admit the Thunder Mustang was 
      a thing of beauty, with performance to match.  But it really wasn't anything 
      all that novel.  A scaled down homebuilt P-51 had been built many times 
      before.  And once again, it wasn't a new design.  Rather it was a re-design 
      of an existing airplane.
      
      Wilson on the other hand has created (designed & built in most cases) many 
      very different, and quite novel aircraft.  Most were all unique, original 
      designs that incorporated innovative Wilson design elements.   Here's the 
      list of the planes Wilson designed as best as I can remember them;
      
      The Bellanca Eagle ag plane, the Avid Flyer (and all of its various 
      models/versions), the Avid 3 place Amphibian/Catalina, the Magnum, the 
      Ellipse, the Jaegar, the Explorer, the Private Explorer, the Finke "Venetian 
      Blind", etc, etc (I'm sure I forgot a few).  And while all of these aircraft 
      will bear some trademark of Deans designs, they are for the most part very 
      different aircraft with very different missions.  Oh yeah, many were custom 
      designed and built "to order" for people like Hubert de Chevigny (the 
      Explorer and the Private Explorer).  But to further explain what I've been 
      trying to say, just because Mr de Chevigny came up with a wish list and a 
      pile of money, that doesn't make him an airplane designer either.  Nor 
      should he receive credit for the design Dean provided him with.  It was Dean 
      that had to come up with the details needed to build an airplane that would 
      meet the buyers mission, and wish list.  And fwiw, I'm certain most aircraft 
      designers wouldn't have even considered trying to design airplanes to meet 
      the requirments that most of Deans airplanes had to.  Even today, as just 
      one simple example, how many low horsepower, inexpensive airplanes can 
      easily carry more than they weigh empty?  The Avid did from the word go. 
      That's genius in design in my opinion.  While everyone else kept building 
      airplanes like the ones before them, Dean always saw things differently, and 
      consequently designed and built things in his own way.  That may have 
      appeared very unconventional at times, and sometimes not the prettiest, but 
      it always worked.
      
      I really don't mean to beat this point to death, but I think it's important 
      to keep the history accurate.  Dan was not an aircraft designer.  Dean was.
      
      However, Dan certainly had his strengths.  He knew how to market his 
      airplane exceptionally well (even Dean admitted that).  I was around the 
      Avid and Kitfox clans as early as 1984.  So I witnessed firsthand some of 
      the rivlary.  It was ugly to say the least.  In the early days, I'm 
      confident Avid had the better airplane.  But Dan did such a good job of 
      marketing that even though his product was somewhat inferior, soon he 
      started to outsell Avid.  And it only got worse as Dan's company grew, and 
      as he continued to give his already cute little Kitfox more and more sex 
      appeal.  And then to make matters worse, both Avid and Kitfox were starting 
      to deal with what appeared to be a saturated market.  Then while they fought 
      between themselves, competitors started popping up everywhere, only 
      worsening each of their market shares.  As time went on it grew more and 
      more difficult, leaving little room for two large companies selling 
      basically the same product.  So the rest is history...
      
      What I walked away with after watching all that over the years was this;  If 
      only Dean and Dan's business relationship had worked out better, I think 
      they would have been unstoppable.  I doubt competition and/or others copying 
      their designs would have been an issue for them.  With Dan's marketing 
      skills promoting the hell out of the airplane the way he could, and Dean 
      back in the shop just making the design (or most likely, designs) better and 
      better, while also fine tuning production methods, there would have been 
      little competition they would have had to worry about.  I always thought it 
      was unfortunate that things didn't work out between them.  But so many times 
      that's the way it goes in business.  Ironically, if you study the history of 
      many of the Avid clones, you will find that history has repeated itself 
      again and again, by separating business partners just like Dan and Dean went 
      through (e.g.; Sky Raider/Ridge Runner, Montana Coyote/Mountain Eagle, etc) 
      I'll probably always wonder what they might have been capable of, and what 
      they may have accomplished as a team?  But I guess there's those of us that 
      will probably always wonder how things might have been different had the 
      Beatles reunited too?  (chuckle)
      
      For any of you that think I am beating a dead horse, I apologize.  I don't 
      mean to.  What I had hoped to accomplish here was to make sure anyone that 
      wants to know more about the heritage of the wonderful airplanes we enjoy, 
      has access to the information.  I'm sure there might be a mistake here and 
      there in all this, but for the most part I believe it to be accurate.
      
      I agree we are fortunate Wilson and Denney got together.  And personally, I 
      wish they would help us all to understand the story a bit better by clearing 
      up any questionable areas.  But I'm going to guess we may never know all the 
      details.  And maybe that's best for history?  If nothing else, it certainly 
      keeps things in our little world here interesting.
      
      Relative to the discussion, having always found Dean Wilsons airplane 
      designs interesting, I saved articles on many ost of them.  If the group 
      here would like to learn more about any of Deans designs, I'd be happy to 
      share what I have.  Maybe we could post a plane at a time, encouraging some 
      fun discussion?  Here's a start with a few pics on "Good News" (aka Venetian 
      Blind), as well as Deans twin engined flying boat named "Explorer II", and 
      the Private Explorer mentioned.
      
      And here's the brain teaser for the day....Who remembers the 4 seat, folding 
      wing, hitch towable, 150+ mph Avid (?) Dean designed and built?
      
      Paul Seehafer
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "fox5flyer" <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net>
      Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:55 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Kitfox an Avid copy?
      
      
      >
      > I've been reading these posts with considerable interest and I hope that 
      > someone is keeping them or filing them away in some sort of archive where 
      > this information will be permanently available, possibly via John McBean 
      > at Kitfox Aircraft, or perhaps Wikipedia.  One thing I noticed was that 
      > the overall tone of the topic seemed to give Dean Wilson most of the 
      > design credit and to tone down DD's role in the birth of the Avid history. 
      > Very similar to Piper and Taylor.  Having built two Kitfoxes, although I 
      > certainly don't consider myself any sort of expert on the topic, I've been 
      > closely involved with Kitfoxes since the early 90s and it's my opinion 
      > that both of these guys are excellent aircraft designers and both share 
      > equally in the development of the Kitfox/Avid heritage.  A perfect example 
      > of Dan Denny's design talent is the Thunder Mustang, one of the fastest 
      > homebuilts on the planet.  http://www.ksql.com/myriad/thunder.htm
      > IMO, these guys are very much like the Beatles.  Each was remarkably 
      > gifted and each made his own unique contribution to the evolution of the 
      > Kitfox/Avid, but partly due to their amazing talents, it was necessary for 
      > them to go their separate ways.  As far as who did specifically what, it 
      > is difficult, if not impossible to accurately gauge this as they were a 
      > partnership and worked together as a team on the project.
      > FWIW,
      > Deke Morisse
      > S5, NE Michigan and snowed in
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? | 
      
      
      Paul and all , great talk in history of the Kitfox and Avid a and designers and
      marketers etc.
      
      BIG THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED !! 
      
      
      My you tube videos a few are just about to go over 10,000 views now
      http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      I can safely say that I have helped sell some Kitfoxes , new or used. 
      I think if everyone on  this list that seems to think they know lots about Kitfoxes
      would put up a video or a few to show the world what a great airplane we
      have then  John would likely sell more kits and the market for these pathetically
      low priced Used Kitfoxes would soon dry up and you would see your Kitfox not
      only continue to be a riot to fly but your investment would grow alot more.
       Right now buying a new kit will depreciate  very quickly but a used one should
      appreciate and in time the new kits might even give a return on investment.
      
      
      So Dean and Dan ,  I hope you think my vidoes have helped what you guys have created
      over the years.
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152119#152119
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Kitfox an Avid copy? | 
      
      
      Interesting, I noticed that Bill Finikies address was Cameron park,   Lowell
      did you know this guy?
      
      John Oakley
      
      
      I'm glad to know someone is enjoying all this Avid / Kitfox history banter. 
      (smile)
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? | 
      
       fuzzy", "well, we did good !!!" kind of reunion up in the place of origin (idaho)
      where all the avids n foxes gathered to express our gratitude to both guys
      & all the others who've kept the designs flying one way or the other.... larson,
      winder, bean, come to mind quickly. in fact, i believe paul shared some old
      video/movies of avid & foxes gathering at fly ins in the early days?? i'd certainly
      love to attend such a "gathering of dean/dan progeny". anyway, keep diggin
      folks & sharing.... i love it!!! john bowman, covering an avid + from airdale
      here in prairieville, la......& merry christmas to u all.....
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----
      From: Paul Seehafer <av8rps@tznet.com>
      Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:37:48 AM
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Kitfox an Avid copy?
      
      Deke,
      
      I'm glad to know someone is enjoying all this Avid / Kitfox history banter. 
      (smile)
      
      I doubt any of us will ever know what would (or wouldn't?) have happend if 
      Dan and Dean never had that discussion about building an ultralight?   But 
      assuming Denney at minimum provided the catalyst to get Deans creative 
      juices flowing, which ultimately resulted in the creation of the 1st Avid 
      Flyer, he certainly deserves some credit.  But not as an aircraft designer. 
      Aside from the Thunder Mustang, to my knowledge Dan never created any "new" 
      airplanes.  Rather, he just kept modifying the existing Kitfox design.   And 
      for the later Kitfox re-designs, I believe he involved engineers (like when 
      the III was re-engineered into the IV).  And I could be wrong, but I'd bet 
      the Thunder Mustang was mostly a contracted design & build (using 
      professional engineers).  It was way too complex of an airplane for your 
      average self taught tube and fabric airplane designer to come up with. 
      Especially considering the high technology composite construction and 
      molding processes used.  But I'm sure the idea to create a scaled down 
      homebuilt Mustang was his. I'd be the first to admit the Thunder Mustang was 
      a thing of beauty, with performance to match.  But it really wasn't anything 
      all that novel.  A scaled down homebuilt P-51 had been built many times 
      before.  And once again, it wasn't a new design.  Rather it was a re-design 
      of an existing airplane.
      
      Wilson on the other hand has created (designed & built in most cases) many 
      very different, and quite novel aircraft.  Most were all unique, original 
      designs that incorporated innovative Wilson design elements.  Here's the 
      list of the planes Wilson designed as best as I can remember them;
      
      The Bellanca Eagle ag plane, the Avid Flyer (and all of its various 
      models/versions), the Avid 3 place Amphibian/Catalina, the Magnum, the 
      Ellipse, the Jaegar, the Explorer, the Private Explorer, the Finke "Venetian 
      Blind", etc, etc (I'm sure I forgot a few).  And while all of these aircraft 
      will bear some trademark of Deans designs, they are for the most part very 
      different aircraft with very different missions.  Oh yeah, many were custom 
      designed and built "to order" for people like Hubert de Chevigny (the 
      Explorer and the Private Explorer).  But to further explain what I've been 
      trying to say, just because Mr de Chevigny came up with a wish list and a 
      pile of money, that doesn't make him an airplane designer either.  Nor 
      should he receive credit for the design Dean provided him with.  It was Dean 
      that had to come up with the details needed to build an airplane that would 
      meet the buyers mission, and wish list.  And fwiw, I'm certain most aircraft 
      designers wouldn't have even considered trying to design airplanes to meet 
      the requirments that most of Deans airplanes had to.  Even today, as just 
      one simple example, how many low horsepower, inexpensive airplanes can 
      easily carry more than they weigh empty?  The Avid did from the word go. 
      That's genius in design in my opinion.  While everyone else kept building 
      airplanes like the ones before them, Dean always saw things differently, and 
      consequently designed and built things in his own way.  That may have 
      appeared very unconventional at times, and sometimes not the prettiest, but 
      it always worked.
      
      I really don't mean to beat this point to death, but I think it's important 
      to keep the history accurate.  Dan was not an aircraft designer.  Dean was.
      
      However, Dan certainly had his strengths.  He knew how to market his 
      airplane exceptionally well (even Dean admitted that).  I was around the 
      Avid and Kitfox clans as early as 1984.  So I witnessed firsthand some of 
      the rivlary.  It was ugly to say the least.  In the early days, I'm 
      confident Avid had the better airplane.  But Dan did such a good job of 
      marketing that even though his product was somewhat inferior, soon he 
      started to outsell Avid.  And it only got worse as Dan's company grew, and 
      as he continued to give his already cute little Kitfox more and more sex 
      appeal.  And then to make matters worse, both Avid and Kitfox were starting 
      to deal with what appeared to be a saturated market.  Then while they fought 
      between themselves, competitors started popping up everywhere, only 
      worsening each of their market shares.  As time went on it grew more and 
      more difficult, leaving little room for two large companies selling 
      basically the same product.  So the rest is history...
      
      What I walked away with after watching all that over the years was this;  If 
      only Dean and Dan's business relationship had worked out better, I think 
      they would have been unstoppable.  I doubt competition and/or others copying 
      their designs would have been an issue for them.  With Dan's marketing 
      skills promoting the hell out of the airplane the way he could, and Dean 
      back in the shop just making the design (or most likely, designs) better and 
      better, while also fine tuning production methods, there would have been 
      little competition they would have had to worry about.  I always thought it 
      was unfortunate that things didn't work out between them.  But so many times 
      that's the way it goes in business.  Ironically, if you study the history of 
      many of the Avid clones, you will find that history has repeated itself 
      again and again, by separating business partners just like Dan and Dean went 
      through (e.g.; Sky Raider/Ridge Runner, Montana Coyote/Mountain Eagle, etc) 
      I'll probably always wonder what they might have been capable of, and what 
      they may have accomplished as a team?  But I guess there's those of us that 
      will probably always wonder how things might have been different had the 
      Beatles reunited too?  (chuckle)
      
      For any of you that think I am beating a dead horse, I apologize.  I don't 
      mean to.  What I had hoped to accomplish here was to make sure anyone that 
      wants to know more about the heritage of the wonderful airplanes we enjoy, 
      has access to the information.  I'm sure there might be a mistake here and 
      there in all this, but for the most part I believe it to be accurate.
      
      I agree we are fortunate Wilson and Denney got together.  And personally, I 
      wish they would help us all to understand the story a bit better by clearing 
      up any questionable areas.  But I'm going to guess we may never know all the 
      details.  And maybe that's best for history?  If nothing else, it certainly 
      keeps things in our little world here interesting.
      
      Relative to the discussion, having always found Dean Wilsons airplane 
      designs interesting, I saved articles on many ost of them.  If the group 
      here would like to learn more about any of Deans designs, I'd be happy to 
      share what I have.  Maybe we could post a plane at a time, encouraging some 
      fun discussion?  Here's a start with a few pics on "Good News" (aka Venetian 
      Blind), as well as Deans twin engined flying boat named "Explorer II", and 
      the Private Explorer mentioned.
      
      And here's the brain teaser for the day....Who remembers the 4 seat, folding 
      wing, hitch towable, 150+ mph Avid (?) Dean designed and built?
      
      Paul Seehafer
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "fox5flyer" <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net>
      Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 5:55 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Kitfox an Avid copy?
      
      
      >
      > I've been reading these posts with considerable interest and I hope that 
      > someone is keeping them or filing them away in some sort of archive where 
      > this information will be permanently available, possibly via John McBean 
      > at Kitfox Aircraft, or perhaps Wikipedia.  One thing I noticed was that 
      > the overall tone of the topic seemed to give Dean Wilson most of the 
      > design credit and to tone down DD's role in the birth of the Avid history. 
      > Very similar to Piper and Taylor.  Having built two Kitfoxes, although I 
      > certainly don't consider myself any sort of expert on the topic, I've been 
      > closely involved with Kitfoxes since the early 90s and it's my opinion 
      > that both of these guys are excellent aircraft designers and both share 
      > equally in the development of the Kitfox/Avid heritage.  A perfect example 
      > of Dan Denny's design talent is the Thunder Mustang, one of the fastest 
      > homebuilts on the planet.  http://www.ksql.com/myriad/thunder.htm
      > IMO, these guys are very much like the Beatles.  Each was remarkably 
      > gifted and each made his own unique contribution to the evolution of the 
      > Kitfox/Avid, but partly due to their amazing talents, it was necessary for 
      > them to go their separate ways.  As far as who did specifically what, it 
      > is difficult, if not impossible to accurately gauge this as they were a 
      > partnership and worked together as a team on the project.
      > FWIW,
      > Deke Morisse
      > S5, NE Michigan and snowed in
      
      
      Be a better friend, newshound, and 
      know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox an Avid copy? | 
      
      
      Seems  to  me that Avids and Kitfoxes were always having the rivalry take off contests
      are flyins.
      
      
      Who won them for the most  part ?
      
      
      TAke a look at a highlander ..  Looks  like  a great copy ......  errrrr plane
      as well of th avid
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      Flying Videos and Kitfox Info
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152189#152189
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Primer installation 912UL | 
      
      
      Hello 912 users
      Does anyone know where to install the fuel primer lines on the 912UL?  I've read
      all the past posts on proper starting procedures and how a primer isn't necessary
      but I'd like to put a squirt button in my KF anyway. 
      Thanks
      
      --------
      Gary Del Bel Belluz
      Toronto, IV / 912UL
      Just getting started
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152232#152232
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Primer installation 912UL | 
      
      
      Please post results when you get this sorted. I'm interested in doing the same
      for mines.
      
      
      > Does anyone know where to install the fuel primer lines on the 912UL? I've read
      all the past posts on proper starting procedures and how a primer isn't necessary
      but I'd like to put a squirt button in my KF anyway. 
      
      
      --------
      Luis Rodriguez
      Model IV 1200
      Rotax 912UL
      Flying Weekly
      Laurens, SC (34A)
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152249#152249
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Primer installation 912UL | 
      
      
      If you have a gascolator, you can run the draw from that point to the prime
      r, then run a line from the primer to a T fitting then to each carb! thats 
      how I have mine set up.
      
      Ray> Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Primer installation 912UL> From: wingnut@spa
      marrest.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:24:18 -0800> To: kitfox-list@matroni
      com>> > Please post results when you get this sorted. I'm interested in doi
      ng the same for mines.> > > > Does anyone know where to install the fuel pr
      imer lines on the 912UL? I've read all the past posts on proper starting pr
      ocedures and how a primer isn't necessary but I'd like to put a squirt butt
      on in my KF anyway. > > > --------> Luis Rodriguez> Model IV 1200> Rotax 91
      2UL> Flying Weekly> Laurens, SC (34A)> > > > > Read this topic online here:
      > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152249#152249> > > > > > 
      ==> > > 
      _________________________________________________________________
      Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.
      http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_1220
      07
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Primer installation 912UL | 
      
      
      Luis,
      The primer line as far as I am concerned is necessary. Every engine that we
      have installed this on has started every time on 2 blades or less. If you
      think about it that is a great improvement.
      Under the carb if you look close there is a barbed fitting with a screw in
      the middle.
      You will need to split t0 both carbs and this creates a problem. At low
      speed or warm up time the carbs are not flowing the same. So what happens is
      one carb will suck all the fuel from the crossover line. If this line is
      more than the normal 1/16 primer line it can cause the engine to stumble for
      quite a time. Of course this would negate the primer.
      I tried several types and sizes of primer line before realizing that the
      aircraft world had already been through this.
      I use a short stroke aircraft primer and this is enough, but any aircraft
      primer will do. 
      After you split (as close to the engine as you can) the line and run to the
      carbs, I put a 20 thousandths safety wire in the end, hanging out and
      sweated solder into the end. After the solder is set, I pulled the safety
      wire out and now I have a 20 thousandths nozzle.
      I push the line up and into the barbed fitting just flush with the carb
      inside. A 1-inch piece of fuel line clamped to the barb and the line holds
      it in place.
      I can not push hard enough on the line size, it really does matter.
      
      John Oakley
      Speedster 4 long and short
      912 ul cap
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of wingnut
      Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 6:24 PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Primer installation 912UL
      
      
      Please post results when you get this sorted. I'm interested in doing the
      same for mines.
      
      
      > Does anyone know where to install the fuel primer lines on the 912UL? I've
      read all the past posts on proper starting procedures and how a primer isn't
      necessary but I'd like to put a squirt button in my KF anyway. 
      
      
      --------
      Luis Rodriguez
      Model IV 1200
      Rotax 912UL
      Flying Weekly
      Laurens, SC (34A)
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152249#152249
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Primer installation 912UL | 
      
      
      John
      I'll take your advice and restrict the primer lines at the carb.
      Thanks for the info.
      
      --------
      Gary Del Bel Belluz
      Toronto, IV / 912UL
      Just getting started
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152278#152278
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Primer installation 912UL and Starting | 
      
      Lockwood sells a special restricter that does the trick.  It screws  into the 
      barbed fitting. I think it is a Rotax part. (You'll need one for  each carb, 
      obviously.) 
      
      They also told me how to start my 912ul by just using the primer and not  the 
      "choke."  Here's how Kerry told me to do it, which works slick as a  whistle 
      every time: Pump two primes into the carbs before starting.  Crack  the 
      throttle a quarter of an inch.  Hit the starter and at the same time,  inject one
      
      more primer load.  Should start up just as nice as can be!!!  Sure has 
      eliminated hard starting for me.  If the plane has been setting  for quite awhile
      (gas 
      out of the system), I usually squirt about three primer  loads into the carbs 
      first, and it may need another couple of squirts to  keep the engine running 
      at first.
      
      Stan  Specht
      Kitfox Model IV Speedster "Columbine"
      912ul with 1275  hours
      Denver,  Colorado
      
      
      **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
      (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Need a Rotax 912 Exhaust system for a Speedster Model IV | 
      
      Still plugging away with the Speedster project and looking for a 
      muffler/exhaust system for a Rotax 912.  If someone has one they are not 
      using, I'd be happy to buy it.  New or used.
      
      Paul Morel
      Speedster Model IV
      Locust Grove, Georgia
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |