Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Sun 05/11/08


Total Messages Posted: 51



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:42 AM - Re: finally i got my check ride, BUT. (Michel Verheughe)
     2. 12:48 AM - ER: gps (Michel Verheughe)
     3. 04:55 AM - Re: gps (steve shinabery)
     4. 04:56 AM - Re: finally i got my check ride, BUT. (KITFOXZ@aol.com)
     5. 05:13 AM - Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In (steve shinabery)
     6. 05:48 AM - Re: gps (fox5flyer)
     7. 05:49 AM - Re: gps (dave)
     8. 05:54 AM - taildragger landing technique. (great bear)
     9. 05:56 AM - Re: gps (SkySteve)
    10. 06:19 AM - Wing stands? (Harold McConnell)
    11. 06:29 AM - Re: Re: gps (bob noffs)
    12. 06:50 AM - Re: Kitfox Coeur D' Alene owners (crazyivan)
    13. 07:09 AM - pda/gps (bob noffs)
    14. 07:09 AM - Re: Wing stands? (Tom Jones)
    15. 07:27 AM - Re: gps (dave)
    16. 07:29 AM - Re: gps (dave)
    17. 08:04 AM - Re: Re: gps (Guy Buchanan)
    18. 08:19 AM - Re: Re: gps (Keith C.)
    19. 08:44 AM - Re: Kitfox Coeur D' Alene owners (Dale Kister)
    20. 08:46 AM - GPS plotting (dave)
    21. 08:54 AM - Re: taildragger landing technique. (dave)
    22. 08:59 AM - Re: Clipping wing and putting on a Speedster wing tip (dave)
    23. 09:00 AM - Re: Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In (dave)
    24. 09:01 AM - Re: gps (Lynn Matteson)
    25. 09:34 AM - Re: pda/gps (Michel Verheughe)
    26. 09:44 AM - Re: Re: taildragger landing technique. (Noel Loveys)
    27. 10:04 AM - Re: finally i got my check ride, BUT. (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Geir_Olav_=D8ien?=)
    28. 10:08 AM - Re: gps (Clint Bazzill)
    29. 10:35 AM - gps (bob noffs)
    30. 10:39 AM - Re: Re: gps (James Shumaker)
    31. 10:56 AM - Weight & Balanace Program  (Charles Bloom)
    32. 11:18 AM - Re: gps (Michel Verheughe)
    33. 11:23 AM - Re: gps (paul wilson)
    34. 11:36 AM - Re: Re: gps (paul wilson)
    35. 11:36 AM - Newbie with a prop ? (nick4853)
    36. 11:48 AM - Re: gps (Lynn Matteson)
    37. 12:01 PM - Re: Weight & Balanace Program  (Pete Christensen)
    38. 01:19 PM -  gps (fox5flyer)
    39. 01:34 PM - Re: gps/ 3 section panel (RRTRACK@aol.com)
    40. 02:18 PM - Re: Newbie with a prop ? (Noel Loveys)
    41. 02:59 PM - Re: Weight & Balanace Program  (jdmcbean)
    42. 03:24 PM - Re: gps (jdmcbean)
    43. 03:30 PM - Re: ER: gps (wingnut)
    44. 04:03 PM - Re: Re: Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In (steve shinabery)
    45. 06:02 PM - Removeable Plastic Film (Charles & Lois Peterson)
    46. 06:17 PM - Re: Weight & Balanace Program (Michael Gibbs)
    47. 06:18 PM - Re: Newbie with a prop ? (Tom Jones)
    48. 09:29 PM - Re: Newbie with a prop ? (Guy Buchanan)
    49. 09:29 PM - Re: Re: gps (Guy Buchanan)
    50. 10:14 PM - Re: Newbie with a prop ? (James Shumaker)
    51. 10:26 PM - finally i got my check ride, BUT. (John Allen)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:42:11 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: finally i got my check ride, BUT.
    > From: Geir Olav =D8ien [geir_olav@c2i.net] > I got my check ride in my Kitfox IV (speedster!)yesterday. BUT I need som e > tip on landing this thing. Gap seal your elevator, Geir! Try first by using any kind of tape. If you l ike it, make something more permanent later. I couldn't do a 3-point landing until I sealed mine. Moving the CoG aft is IMHO not a very good idea. And yes, I agree with Tom; if you bounce it is b ecause, by hitting the main gear first, it induced a pitch-up rotation and you gain lift. Why don't you come to Jarlsberg and we do some landings together? If you do n't like asphalt, you can land on the grass shoulders of the runway. I have asked the airfield manager before and he says it's okay. Call me at 90206822 and we find a day to do that. Med vennlig hilsen, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:40 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: gps
    I have a PocketPC PDA with PocketFMS and I am very pleased with it. I've just puchased a cheap Mio PND carNav and it runs very well on that unit too. PocketFMS runs on anything with Windows, Mobile Windows or CE Windows. It means any PC, UMPC, PDA or PND. You can customize it to do exactly what you want. Even the label of the buttons can be customized. It's European but it has a well maintained US database. Check: www.pocketfms.com Cheers, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:55:40 AM PST US
    From: steve shinabery <shinco@bright.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    bob noffs wrote: > steve, picture the airmap 2000 as a flush panel mount. i have seen the > modification and it is slick. nothing to hold, no exposed wires. > everyone has their favorites, i just wanted to give a heads up to > anyone interested. > > bob noffs > * > > > * > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Checked by AVG. > Hi Bob,yes every one has there Favorites..a friend of mine has a Airmap 2000.he does not have the room to mount panel.it is just too big,,he saw my Garmin 296.that I have in my kitfox 2..and he sold his Airmap and bought a 296..for the same reason.the 296 does not take much room on the panel.and you can mount it all most any where.does not take much room..I too looked at the Airmap,but went with the 296,because of its size and features..I know the my KF just does not have the room for the airmap.I have a full panel,and needed some thing that would not take up so much space.But then again every one has there favorites..and that is why I went with the 296.. STEVE SHINABERY N554KF KF2


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:56:30 AM PST US
    From: KITFOXZ@aol.com
    Subject: Re: finally i got my check ride, BUT.
    Yes! I also like the definition of: "A landing" is defined as: "Where a 30-foot aircraft contacts a sphere 8,000 miles in diameter --after which the pilot smiles knowingly." John P. Marzluf "John Z" Columbus, Ohio Series V Outback (still out back in the garage) Do Not Archive In a message dated 5/10/2008 10:15:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bnn@nethere.com writes: "A good landing is one in which you can use the airplane again!" Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. **************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:13:35 AM PST US
    From: steve shinabery <shinco@bright.net>
    Subject: Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In
    Do to the weather here in OHIO.there will be no Fly In at this time...BUT we will have it at another date soon..The Sky Gods did not give us blue sky ..instead we got got a Gray Sky,and Windy Day :'( ..So the Locals will have a large feast today of FOX Burgers and AVID Dogs ;-) and I will spend the rest of the day,cleaning the FOX... 8-) Thanks for every one that was going to come,, STEVE SHINABERY N554KF KF2


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:48:20 AM PST US
    From: "fox5flyer" <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    I have a Garmin 196, much like the 296, except it's monochrome. Rather than try to mount it on the panel where it takes up space, I used the yoke mount and mounted it on the stick. It sits nicely between my legs high above my knees, doesn't contact anything, easy to see, and best of all, if I decide to upgrade to something else, nothing is permanent. It's also very simple to pop it out and take it with me when I leave the airplane parked on the ramp. My advice to anyone planning to permanently install a GPS in the panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fast a home computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. There are lots of ways to mount it without having to cut holes. Deke Morisse Mikado Michigan S5/Subaru/CAP 355+ TT "The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress." - Joseph Joubert >> >> Checked by AVG. > Hi Bob,yes every one has there Favorites..a friend of mine has a Airmap > 2000.he does not have the room to mount panel.it is just too big,,he saw > my Garmin 296.that I have in my kitfox 2..and he sold his Airmap and > bought a 296..for the same reason.the 296 does not take much room on the > panel.and you can mount it all most any where.does not take much room..I > too looked at the Airmap,but went with the 296,because of its size and > features..I know the my KF just does not have the room for the airmap.I > have a full panel,and needed some thing that would not take up so much > space.But then again every one has there favorites..and that is why I went > with the 296.. STEVE SHINABERY N554KF KF2 > > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:49:28 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: gps
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    I have a Garmin 196. Works great , simple and cheap http://cgi.ebay.com/Garmin-196-GPS_W0QQitemZ260237011398QQihZ016QQcategoryZ84075QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem You can buy used for usually about 400$ or so. or new for 799$ If it dies Garmin charges 200$ and they repair of replace it. Good deal imo. If you want the aviation databases they go with a 196 over a 195. All your airport data is right there. Here is a few pics from our short trip yesterday. -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182466#182466 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/no_trespassing_155.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/longpoint_127.jpg


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:54:29 AM PST US
    From: great bear <av8r2488@yahoo.com>
    Subject: taildragger landing technique.
    Hello all, I was just checking out the list and had to make a post about the fellow getting a check ride and having difficulties with landings....Go back to your primary flight training and remember that proper landings begin with holding the aircraft at three point attitude plus a little more...it does not matter whether its a trike gear or tail dragger the same rule applies...three point plus a little at landing....so this means that proper landing flare is three point plus ..so the tail wheel would touch down slightly first and as the main gear touches down, the angle of attack decreases and the aircraft will stay on the ground....conversely if you touch the mains first and then the tailwheel the angle of attack increases and the aircraft will return to the air and then the pilot induced oscillation starts....as you become more proficient you will be able to touch all three wheels at the same time and then move on to wheel landings...25 year pilot 95% taildragger time...flying a Glasair 1 TD Now on to my issue...I am building a 5 outback and will be installing an 0-200 cont....any prop recomendations as well as exhaust....leaning towards an IVO magnum two blade....would like to keep things light as I am building for light sport. Great forum and good advice....GARY Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:56:56 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: gps
    From: "SkySteve" <Wilson@REinfo.org>
    Bob, I am also planning on purchasing a Lowrance 2000c. Sporty's has it for $599. Who has it for $589 including shipping? -------- Steve Wilson Huntsville, UT Kitfox I-IV 85DD 912A / 3 Blade Warp Drive Convertable Nosewheel &amp; Tailwheel Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182468#182468


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:29 AM PST US
    From: Harold McConnell <kf30hm@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Wing stands?
    Can anyone out there in Kitfox world give me some information on building wing stands to support the wings while covering and painting the wings on a Kitfox. My wings have permanently attached droop tips so that needs to be taken into account. What have you used, what worked well, simple to build... I am re-covering the wings on my model 3 and was hoping for a better way to handle the wings during this process. Help! Harold - N830HM - Kitfox 3 with 582 and tube gear - 760 hours. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:29:09 AM PST US
    From: "bob noffs" <icubob@newnorth.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    hi steve, go to www.pilotshop.com bob noffs ----- Original Message ----- From: "SkySteve" <Wilson@REinfo.org> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 7:54 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: gps > > Bob, > I am also planning on purchasing a Lowrance 2000c. Sporty's has it for > $599. Who has it for $589 including shipping? > > -------- > Steve Wilson > Huntsville, UT > Kitfox I-IV 85DD > 912A / 3 Blade Warp Drive > Convertable Nosewheel &amp; Tailwheel > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182468#182468 > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:27 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Coeur D' Alene owners
    From: "crazyivan" <dmivezic@yahoo.com>
    Did you try Spokane for lodging? It's a larger city not too far away. Good luck to your wife. -------- Dave Speedster 912 UL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182475#182475


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:09:39 AM PST US
    From: "bob noffs" <icubob@newnorth.net>
    Subject: pda/gps
    hi michel, a few years ago i downloaded a very cheap program to use my palm pilot for navigation. no complaints, it worked as advertised. from somewhere i acquired the wiring harnesses to hook the palm pilot to my garmin 12. what i ran into with the harness was that although it charged the gps it didnt charge the palm pilot! that made the harness useless as far as i was concerned. i have since found a vendor who makes a correct harness for $65. do you know of any suppliers for the harness that charges everything? at this point the palm pilot would be a ''backup''. i am starting to lean towards a used ebay aviation handheld as a backup rather than dumping $80 on a harness. bob noffs


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:09:46 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing stands?
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    kf30hm(at)yahoo.com wrote: > Can anyone out there in Kitfox world give me some information on building wing stands to support the wings while covering and painting the wings on a Kitfox. My wings have permanently attached droop tips so that needs to be taken into account. What have you used, what worked well, simple to build... I am re-covering the wings on my model 3 and was hoping for a better way to handle the wings during this process. Help! > Harold - N830HM - Kitfox 3 with 582 and tube gear - 760 hours. > Harold, here's a link to an easy to build wing painting rotisserie. http://www.sportflight.com/cgi-bin/uploader.pl?action=view&epoch=1009991609 For covering you can't find an easier or more useful support than the modified saw horses shown in the Polly Fiber manual. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182476#182476


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:27:57 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: gps
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Here are some pics of my Garmin 196 -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182482#182482 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/jim_008_671.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/jim_013_516.jpg


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:13 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: gps
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Garmin 196 new 695 $ http://www.canada-shops.com/Stores/vippilotcenter/c26848.2.html -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182483#182483


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:04:00 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: gps
    At 05:42 AM 5/11/2008, fox5flyer wrote: >My advice to anyone planning to permanently install a GPS in the >panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fast a home >computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. There >are lots of ways to mount it without having to cut holes. Are you a techno-junkie Deke? :-) Actually this is a really good argument for modular face plates on panels. Those of you who are building should consider making the entire face of the panel modular and replaceable so you can have things neatly in the panel, but change with technology. I prefer stuff in the panel, but unfortunately my panel is not modular, so I'm stuck with it until a major re-fit. At that time I'll modify it to be modular. Fortunately I don't care much about new stuff since my needs are really simple. (VFR + basic GPS + music. And I mostly care about the music. TGFIpod.) Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:19:56 AM PST US
    From: "Keith C." <kcflys@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    Guy, When I get there (re-fit) where would I look for modular info. Do not archive Keith C. Mod IV 912 IVO Mather (MHR) CA > Are you a techno-junkie Deke? :-) Actually this is a really > good argument for modular face plates on panels. Those of you who are > building should consider making the entire face of the panel modular > and replaceable so you can have things neatly in the panel, but > change with technology. I prefer stuff in the panel, but > unfortunately my panel is not modular, so I'm stuck with it until a > major re-fit. At that time I'll modify it to be modular. Fortunately > I don't care much about new stuff since my needs are really simple. > (VFR + basic GPS + music. And I mostly care about the music. TGFIpod.) > > > Guy Buchanan > San Diego, CA > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:59 AM PST US
    From: Dale Kister <dale@dalekister.com>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Coeur D' Alene owners
    I did live in CDA, but I am located in Phoenix now, so can't help much. Try Post Falls, they have several motels and they are only 10 miles west of CDA> Good luck, Dale Kister debrun26@juno.com wrote: > > Are there any Kitfox members that live in Coeur D' Alene, Idaho that > would be able to put my wife, son And I up for the night of May 24th > (Memorial weekend). We are coming from Alaska for my wife to run the > marathon in Cueur D' Alene and just checked for lodging, not realizing > it was memorial weekend, and found everyone already booked. Please > contact me off line~ Thanks much, Layne Cropper Anchorage, Ak > S5 EA81 907-569-2767 > > > _____________________________________________________________ > Let great B to B marketing solutions propel your brand to new heights! > Click now! > <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2112/fc/Ioyw6iigEPMLKTwEsTtUn6qUyjoj7FSOqZ6G0lvQptw8SKT7ABMBKT/?count=1234567890> > * > > > *


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:46:41 AM PST US
    Subject: GPS plotting
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Some of the neatest stuff is showing your trip Here is a few from yesterday as we landed on a narrow beach 20 miles out on a sand spit near the USA border. Kitfox is truly an amazing aircraft. I took a passenger out there yesterday and he was totally amazed at what a Kitfox could do off the tarmac. Soft sand, shallow water etc. Beach landings were scattered with driftwood and debris from winter and this is very remote area. My poor little Kitfox IV 582 with 450 hours hauled us both 220 lbs each off the soft sand with really no wind in about 200 feet and we cruised about 90 to 92 mph with the big Kingfox tires. Truly amazing aircraft. Dave -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182491#182491 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/lp2_171.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/lp1_201.jpg


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:54:37 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: taildragger landing technique.
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    I have some landing on my Videos here you could search through http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer Some here for sure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j7aBw90n9U I never really pay much attention to how I land on mains or all three or even on one main. Too much fun flying these Kitfox to think about that stuff :) Hope these help Dave -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182493#182493


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:59:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Clipping wing and putting on a Speedster wing tip
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    > Have a Classic Kitfox IV 1050lb 100% completed. > Thinking of clipping the wing and installing a Speedster wing tip. > Does anyone have a diagram of the Speedster wing measurements? > Also in the process of installing a radiator scoop for the Rotax 912ul. > Kitfox has the tips for $170 each, plus $350 for hardware. > To clarify-- are Classic IV is a 1200 gross model. I would think that you have a 1050 Kitfox IV with droop tips. I have pondered the though of the newer hoerner style tips but I have yet to see and conclusive proof that I Will gain or lose anything so I still have my droop tips performance wise. If you cut your wings shorter you will lose STOL performance and I don't think the speed gain will be much. You might lose gross weight as well. Question is what do you really want out of your Kitfox? -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182494#182494


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:00:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In
    From: "dave" <dave@cfisher.com>
    Steve, sorry to hear about the cancellation today. Always another day !! -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182495#182495


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:33 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    I mounted my 296 in the quick-release mount that came with the unit. I built a bracket that adapts the quick-release mount to the panel. It stands just off the panel, so there is no need to cut the panel. Any future updating will simply require a new bracket. Lynn Matteson On May 11, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Guy Buchanan wrote: > > At 05:42 AM 5/11/2008, fox5flyer wrote: >> My advice to anyone planning to permanently install a GPS in the >> panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fast a home >> computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. There >> are lots of ways to mount it without having to cut holes. > > Are you a techno-junkie Deke? :-) Actually this is a really > good argument for modular face plates on panels. Those of you who > are building should consider making the entire face of the panel > modular and replaceable so you can have things neatly in the panel, > but change with technology. I prefer stuff in the panel, but > unfortunately my panel is not modular, so I'm stuck with it until a > major re-fit. At that time I'll modify it to be modular. > Fortunately I don't care much about new stuff since my needs are > really simple. (VFR + basic GPS + music. And I mostly care about > the music. TGFIpod.) > > > Guy Buchanan > San Diego, CA > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. > >


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:34:54 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: pda/gps
    > From: bob noffs [icubob@newnorth.net] > do you know of any suppliers for the harness that charges everything? Alas, Bob, it's a jungle out there. As you know, the IT has gone wild and competition is so hard that they confuse you just to be able to do comparison impossible. That's what my son, who works for the major Norwegian telecom provider, tells me. A Palm is not a PocketPC. Different software. PocketFMS, which is what I use and know well, works on the PocketPC software, which is Microsoft Mobile Windows. Garmin/Jeppesen is today dominating the market. Good products. But if we - the pilots - want to be able to choose, we need at least two competing products. If you buy, e.g. a Lowrance, you still buy the Jeppesen's database. What we need is someone else who gather all data, those found in the AIPs but also those from different non-AIP (understand, private) airfields. If you want to do it correctly, you have to check all the data and update it for every AIRAC, i.e. every 28 days. To do that for a worldwide database is a Herculean work. But that's what PocketFMS does. Actually, I am the guy who maintains the Norwegian part of the database. I am not paid for that, I do it simply because I feel those guys need a help so that they can get started. Hardware and software vary. Each product says that their hardware is better (screen resolution, readability in sunlight) and their software is also better (WX display, flight planning, etc.) The truth is that the most important factor is the accuracy of the database. Airspace infringement is a big problem over here and I think it is too in the US. When ATC says: Avoid Romeo one two because active, it is not time to answer: I don't have that Restriced area on my GPS moving map. PocketFMS used to be 'donationware.' But they had to give up that when the DAFIF database was no longer available. Everything then had to be done by hand and at least two persons had to work at maintaining the database on full time basis. Even if aided by a bunch of helping benevolants. The main advantage of PocketFMS is that you can run it on the hardware you want - as long as it is Microsoft compatible. Flight planning is on the PC, then you sync to your PDA or PND and go and fly. The GPS is incorporated in those units and if you connect it to your aircraft battery, you are in business. I have two PDA but I newly bought a cheap Mio PND, the type that you have in your car. I simply sync the program from the PC on a SD memory card and insert it in the PND. Lo and behold, instead of the road nagivation software, I have PocketFMS with all of its functions. The drawback of PocketFMS is that you must subscribe on a yearly basis. You then get all the 13 updates from the AIRACs. But, unlike other products, you cannot buy only one update. That's a policy the founders of PocketFMS have decided: Safety first. If you fly with e.g. 9 months old data, it may not be accurate; airspace changes very often, at least here in Europe. With the yearly subscription that costs 150 Euro, you know that you have the latest data anytime. When I fly e.g. from Norway to Belgium, crossing Swedish, Danish, German, Dutch and Belgian airspaces, I want to stay away from problems and fly VFR safely. Cheers, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:58 AM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Re: taildragger landing technique.
    Only problem with your videos is I tend to spend a half hour looking the rest of them again... and again...and again They're like chips, one is never enough. Keep posting. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of dave Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 1:22 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: taildragger landing technique. I have some landing on my Videos here you could search through http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer Some here for sure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j7aBw90n9U I never really pay much attention to how I land on mains or all three or even on one main. Too much fun flying these Kitfox to think about that stuff :) Hope these help Dave -------- Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada Flying Videos and Kitfox Info http://www.cfisher.com/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182493#182493


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:04:24 AM PST US
    From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Geir_Olav_=D8ien?= <geir_olav@c2i.net>
    Subject: finally i got my check ride, BUT.
    Michel I will gap seal my elevator to see if that helps. I will call you soon, and I will come down to your place and we can do some landings at Jarlsberg (only soft field landings for me), just need a new radio, or fix the one I have (ICOM that will not transmit, only receive). But I see the point where I do not have enough elevator authority and the main wheels hit the ground before the tail (with the control stick fully aft). CG is not a issue, because I have a 25lbs chute mounted below the turtle deck, and my CG is in the aft range. Thanks for your offer Michel, talk to you later. Geir LN-YGR Kitfox IV (speedster wing) Jabiru 2200. http://tinyurl.com/6d245z -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] P vegne av Michel Verheughe Sendt: 11. mai 2008 09:38 Til: kitfox-list@matronics.com Emne: RE: Kitfox-List: finally i got my check ride, BUT. > From: Geir Olav ien [geir_olav@c2i.net] > I got my check ride in my Kitfox IV (speedster!)yesterday. BUT I need some > tip on landing this thing. Gap seal your elevator, Geir! Try first by using any kind of tape. If you like it, make something more permanent later. I couldn't do a 3-point landing until I sealed mine. Moving the CoG aft is IMHO not a very good idea. And yes, I agree with Tom; if you bounce it is because, by hitting the main gear first, it induced a pitch-up rotation and you gain lift. Why don't you come to Jarlsberg and we do some landings together? If you don't like asphalt, you can land on the grass shoulders of the runway. I have asked the airfield manager before and he says it's okay. Call me at 90206822 and we find a day to do that. Med vennlig hilsen, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 <pre><b><font size=2 color=000000" face="courier new,courier"> href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matronics.c om/Navigator?Kitfox-List</a> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com</a> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contri bution</a> </b></font></pre>


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:08:11 AM PST US
    From: Clint Bazzill <clint_bazzill@hotmail.com>
    Subject: gps
    I think that cutting a hole in the panel for a custom mount is ok, But I wo uld make it square and standard size and then make an adapter to fit the GP S that way you, or some one else could change units. Clint> Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 08:00:40 -0700> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com; kitfox-list@matroni cs.com> From: bnn@nethere.com> Subject: Re: Re: Kitfox-List: gps> > --> Kit fox-List message posted by: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>> > At 05:42 AM 5 /11/2008, fox5flyer wrote:> >My advice to anyone planning to permanently in stall a GPS in the > >panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fas t a home > >computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. Ther e > >are lots of ways to mount it without having to cut holes.> > Are you a techno-junkie Deke? :-) Actually this is a really > good argument for modu lar face plates on panels. Those of you who are > building should consider making the entire face of the panel modular > and replaceable so you can ha ve things neatly in the panel, but > change with technology. I prefer stuff in the panel, but > unfortunately my panel is not modular, so I'm stuck wi th it until a > major re-fit. At that time I'll modify it to be modular. Fo rtunately > I don't care much about new stuff since my needs are really sim ple. > (VFR + basic GPS + music. And I mostly care about the music. TGFIpod .)> > > Guy Buchanan> San Diego, CA> K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, ===========> > >


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:35:43 AM PST US
    From: "bob noffs" <icubob@newnorth.net>
    Subject: gps
    hi lynn, those quick release panel mounts are a slick way to go. if redoing a panel for a new gps were a problem i would go with the bracket you talk about. as it is my panel has everything [ engine monitor, flight instruments switches , etc] but the transponder on the left 18 inches. i made the panel removeable and in 4 pieces so a new gps would require a piece of panel i could make in probably 2 hours. the pilot side is a different matter, it would take several days of layout and a hundred holes to drill. the fisher dakota hawk is blessed with a lot of panel space. i just looked and i have your address, probably from the jab list. i will send you a pic. bob noffs


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:05 AM PST US
    From: James Shumaker <jimshumaker@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    I just flew with a low end monochrome Lowrance and found it was very BAD. It popped up warnings every time I turned the plane (you are approaching Monterey airspace). The warning was right the center of the moving map. A moving map that is default north up and knots (with no label to tell if it is knots or mph) and no way to change the start up defaults. Was more of a distraction than a help. For the same money you can get Anywhere map loaded on a PDA that is brilliant color, daylight readable and loads of excellent features. Anywhere map is not as solidly reliable and easy to use a the Garmin 296, but GPS is definitely a place where you get what you pay for. Jim Shumaker ----- Original Message ---- From: SkySteve <Wilson@REinfo.org> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:54:32 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: gps Bob, I am also planning on purchasing a Lowrance 2000c. Sporty's has it for $599. Who has it for $589 including shipping? -------- Steve Wilson Huntsville, UT Kitfox I-IV 85DD 912A / 3 Blade Warp Drive Convertable Nosewheel &amp; Tailwheel Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182468#182468


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:56:13 AM PST US
    From: "Charles Bloom" <kj7sr@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Weight & Balanace Program
    About a year ago, in reply to a request, a kind soul sent me a weight and balance program for their kitfox in Excel format. I worked beautifully. Unfortuantely it for erased from my file. I would sure like to get it back. Thanks Chuck Kitfox Model IV do not archive


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:18:40 AM PST US
    From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no>
    Subject: gps
    > From: Clint Bazzill [clint_bazzill@hotmail.com] > My advice to anyone planning to permanently install a GPS in the > panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fast a home > computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. I agree 100%. During the five years I've had my Kitfox, I have changed for three different hardware. I have a hole big enough to have a power cable through it, then four holes in which I screw homemade aluminium adaptors that match the supporting bracket of the device. Here is how my latest Mio PND looks like: http://home.online.no/~michel/tmp/PocketFMS/Mio.jpg Cheers, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 Do not archive <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:09 AM PST US
    From: paul wilson <pwmac@sisna.com>
    Subject: Re: gps
    And if you do not like that mount, "RAM" makes universal mounts the will work any situation. I like the gps very close by to allow ease of reading and ease of control. The are ball joint adjustable and the one I use allows the gps to snap in and out. Here is an example http://www.gpszone.com/cgi-bin/shopper.cgi?preadd=action&key=RMGUB138GA7 However your imagination allows nearly unlimited variations. Like suction cups and longer arms and dual ball joints, etc.. PW ============= At 09:58 AM 5/11/2008, you wrote: > >I mounted my 296 in the quick-release mount that came with the unit. >I built a bracket that adapts the quick-release mount to the panel. >It stands just off the panel, so there is no need to cut the panel. >Any future updating will simply require a new bracket. > > >Lynn Matteson > > >On May 11, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Guy Buchanan wrote: > >> >>At 05:42 AM 5/11/2008, fox5flyer wrote: >>>My advice to anyone planning to permanently install a GPS in the >>>panel is to rethink it. The technology changes as fast a home >>>computers and once you cut that hole you're stuck with it. There >>>are lots of ways to mount it without having to cut holes. >> >> Are you a techno-junkie Deke? :-) Actually this is a really >>good argument for modular face plates on panels. Those of you who >>are building should consider making the entire face of the panel >>modular and replaceable so you can have things neatly in the panel, >>but change with technology. I prefer stuff in the panel, but >>unfortunately my panel is not modular, so I'm stuck with it until a >>major re-fit. At that time I'll modify it to be modular. >>Fortunately I don't care much about new stuff since my needs are >>really simple. (VFR + basic GPS + music. And I mostly care about >>the music. TGFIpod.) >> >> >>Guy Buchanan >>San Diego, CA >>K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. >> >> > >


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:36:43 AM PST US
    From: paul wilson <pwmac@sisna.com>
    Subject: Re: gps
    I am surpriesed with your issues with the Lowrance. But good to hear about them. My hiking Lowrance allows me to display things like heading, speed, and many other items either with or without the label. I can define the units and whether I want to display them and I always delete the warnings. Of course even if a warning is displayed just touch the exit button and it goes away. I thought all the Lowrance units used the same chip? True monochome is not preferred. My color units can be adjusted for very clear viewing in bright sunlight. Not wise for hiking due to short battery life. IMO, From my reading the Garmin is the way to go. PW ================ At 11:35 AM 5/11/2008, you wrote: >I just flew with a low end monochrome Lowrance and found it was very >BAD. It popped up warnings every time I turned the plane (you are >approaching Monterey airspace). The warning was right the center of >the moving map. A moving map that is default north up and knots >(with no label to tell if it is knots or mph) and no way to change >the start up defaults. Was more of a distraction than a help. > >For the same money you can get Anywhere map loaded on a PDA that is >brilliant color, daylight readable and loads of excellent >features. Anywhere map is not as solidly reliable and easy to use a >the Garmin 296, but GPS is definitely a place where you get what you pay for. > >Jim Shumaker > >----- Original Message ---- >From: SkySteve <Wilson@REinfo.org> >To: kitfox-list@matronics.com >Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:54:32 AM >Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: gps > ><<mailto:Wilson@REinfo.org>Wilson@REinfo.org> > >Bob, >I am also planning on purchasing a Lowrance 2000c. Sporty's has it >for $599. Who has it for $589 including shipping? > >-------- >Steve Wilson >Huntsville, UT >Kitfox I-IV 85DD >912A / 3 Blade Warp Drive >Convertable Nosewheel &amp; Tailwheel > > >Read this topic online here: > > ><http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List ><http://www.matronics.com/contribution>http://www.matronics.com/contribution >


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:36:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Newbie with a prop ?
    From: "nick4853" <nweiskopf@verizon.net>
    I've been lurking in the shadows for along time. I've been fascinated by this little airplane and all the talk. I am currently going for my light sport with 17.3 hrs down. So two weeks ago I saw a nice model iv on barnstormers with 102 hrs and a trailer I bit the bullet threw my money down and now I have N433R sitting in the shop. I've gone over it with a/p friend and everything looks good but the old gsc prop has got to go (5year, 500hr AD). I ordered a new warp tapper tip to go in front of the 912ul. My ? is what if anything do I have to do to keep the Faa happy. Is this considered major under Far 21.93 and if so what procedure is necessary to keep my certificate valid. Thanks , Nick Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182523#182523


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:48:09 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: gps
    Hi Bob- You did the panel like I should have....in sections...that's a good idea. So far I haven't needed to change anything on mine, except for a change from one type of turn coordinator to another, but in the same size. How long before the plane is done? Lynn On May 11, 2008, at 1:27 PM, bob noffs wrote: > hi lynn, > those quick release panel mounts are a slick way to go. if redoing > a panel for a new gps were a problem i would go with the bracket > you talk about. as it is my panel has everything [ engine monitor, > flight instruments switches , etc] but the transponder on the left > 18 inches. i made the panel removeable and in 4 pieces so a new gps > would require a piece of panel i could make in probably 2 hours. > the pilot side is a different matter, it would take several days of > layout and a hundred holes to drill. the fisher dakota hawk is > blessed with a lot of panel space. > i just looked and i have your address, probably from the jab list. > i will send you a pic. > bob noffs > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List_- > ============================================================ _- > forums.matronics.com_- > ============================================================ _- > contribution_- > ===========================================================


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:48 PM PST US
    From: "Pete Christensen" <apeterchristensen@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Weight & Balanace Program
    It's on Merle's web site. Pete http://murlewilliamsaviation.com/ads.html ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles Bloom To: Kitfox-List@matronics.com Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 10:03 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Weight & Balanace Program About a year ago, in reply to a request, a kind soul sent me a weight and balance program for their kitfox in Excel format. I worked beautifully. Unfortuantely it for erased from my file. I would sure like to get it back. Thanks Chuck Kitfox Model IV do not archive


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:19:30 PM PST US
    From: "fox5flyer" <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net>
    Subject: gps
    At one time Skystar was offering a 3-section panel. Very nice unit and if I was to redo mine, that's the way I would go. Does anybody know if John or any aftermarket vendors still supply these panels for a Kitfox? Deke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Matteson" <lynnmatt@jps.net> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: gps > > Hi Bob- > You did the panel like I should have....in sections...that's a good idea. > So far I haven't needed to change anything on mine, except for a change > from one type of turn coordinator to another, but in the same size. How > long before the plane is done? > > Lynn > On May 11, 2008, at 1:27 PM, bob noffs wrote: > >> hi lynn, >> those quick release panel mounts are a slick way to go. if redoing a >> panel for a new gps were a problem i would go with the bracket you talk >> about. as it is my panel has everything [ engine monitor, flight >> instruments switches , etc] but the transponder on the left 18 inches. >> i made the panel removeable and in 4 pieces so a new gps would require a >> piece of panel i could make in probably 2 hours. the pilot side is a >> different matter, it would take several days of layout and a hundred >> holes to drill. the fisher dakota hawk is blessed with a lot of panel >> space. >> i just looked and i have your address, probably from the jab list. i >> will send you a pic. >> bob noffs >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List_- >> ============================================================ _- >> forums.matronics.com_- >> ============================================================ _- >> contribution_- >> =========================================================== > > >


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:34:02 PM PST US
    From: RRTRACK@aol.com
    Subject: Re: gps/ 3 section panel
    I have the 3 section panel on my Vixen. I really like it. I hope to go to a glass panel next year and will need new sections to work with. I'd be interested if they are available as well. Mark Kitfox 5 Vixen 912UL IVO Hartford, Wisconsin **************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:18:43 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Newbie with a prop ?
    How is your plane registered? AB? I can't speak for U.S., but I expect you will be ok to do the swap and if you don't have the repairman cert you can get your A&P to sign it off. I expect the folks at Warp have come across this before. Check with them. Noel Loveys AME Intern, RPP Kitfox III-A, 582,B box Ivo IFA, Aerocet 1100 floats -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of nick4853 Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 4:04 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Newbie with a prop ? I've been lurking in the shadows for along time. I've been fascinated by this little airplane and all the talk. I am currently going for my light sport with 17.3 hrs down. So two weeks ago I saw a nice model iv on barnstormers with 102 hrs and a trailer I bit the bullet threw my money down and now I have N433R sitting in the shop. I've gone over it with a/p friend and everything looks good but the old gsc prop has got to go (5year, 500hr AD). I ordered a new warp tapper tip to go in front of the 912ul. My ? is what if anything do I have to do to keep the Faa happy. Is this considered major under Far 21.93 and if so what procedure is necessary to keep my certificate valid. Thanks , Nick Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182523#182523


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:17 PM PST US
    From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@kitfoxaircraft.com>
    Subject: Weight & Balanace Program
    Try this link as well for Weight & Balance templates. HYPERLINK "http://kitfoxaircraft.com/FAQ-Tech.htm"http://kitfoxaircraft.com/FAQ-Tech.h tm Fly Safe !! John & Debra McBean Ph 208.337.5111 www.kitfoxaircraft.com "The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground" Checked by AVG. 11:12 AM


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:24:54 PM PST US
    From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean@kitfoxaircraft.com>
    Subject: gps
    Yes we do... Actually we can supply most if not all the parts for the Kitfox Models. Some of the older ones... pre Model IV take a little time but we can usually help. Safe to say that for the Model IV and newer models we can help with most any part. Fly Safe !! John & Debra McBean Ph 208.337.5111 www.kitfoxaircraft.com "The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground" -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of fox5flyer Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 2:14 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: gps At one time Skystar was offering a 3-section panel. Very nice unit and if I was to redo mine, that's the way I would go. Does anybody know if John or any aftermarket vendors still supply these panels for a Kitfox? Deke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Matteson" <lynnmatt@jps.net> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: gps > > Hi Bob- > You did the panel like I should have....in sections...that's a good idea. > So far I haven't needed to change anything on mine, except for a change > from one type of turn coordinator to another, but in the same size. How > long before the plane is done? > > Lynn > On May 11, 2008, at 1:27 PM, bob noffs wrote: > >> hi lynn, >> those quick release panel mounts are a slick way to go. if redoing a >> panel for a new gps were a problem i would go with the bracket you talk >> about. as it is my panel has everything [ engine monitor, flight >> instruments switches , etc] but the transponder on the left 18 inches. >> i made the panel removeable and in 4 pieces so a new gps would require a >> piece of panel i could make in probably 2 hours. the pilot side is a >> different matter, it would take several days of layout and a hundred >> holes to drill. the fisher dakota hawk is blessed with a lot of panel >> space. >> i just looked and i have your address, probably from the jab list. i >> will send you a pic. >> bob noffs >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List_- >> ============================================================ _- >> forums.matronics.com_- >> ============================================================ _- >> contribution_- >> =========================================================== > > > Checked by AVG. 11:12 AM Checked by AVG. 11:12 AM


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:30:44 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: ER: gps
    From: "wingnut" <wingnut@spamarrest.com>
    I installed a Pocket PC in my plane (Dell Axim X3) with the intention of running Pocket FMS. This was back when Pocket FMS was free. I was a bit disappointed with the readability in sunlight and then Pocket FMS stopped being free. In fact, not only is it not free, you can't buy it. You can only rent it for $210/year (at the current exchange rate). Once I added up the PDA, the GPS and two years rent on the software, it was coming out the same price as a reconditioned Garmin 296. No contest in my mind. http://www.tropicaero.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=296-081 -------- Luis Rodriguez Model IV 1200 Rotax 912UL Flying Weekly Laurens, SC (34A) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182566#182566


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:03:47 PM PST US
    From: steve shinabery <shinco@bright.net>
    Subject: Re: Great Lakes Area,Kitfox Fly In
    dave wrote: > > Steve, sorry to hear about the cancellation today. > > Always another day !! > > -------- > Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada > Flying Videos and Kitfox Info > http://www.cfisher.com/ > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182495#182495 > > > Thanks Dave,,a few brave people did drive in..I did get to fly today,flying around the rain cells :'( ..BUT Spring Weather here in OHIO >:o ,right now a little sick,I think I ate too many FOX burgers+AVID Dogs..Thanks Dave Fisher,,,,but we will have another one at a later date,when the SKY Gods give us BLUE Skys,,,,STEVE SHINABERY N554KF KF2


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:17 PM PST US
    From: "Charles & Lois Peterson" <chasnlois@t6wireless.com>
    Subject: Removeable Plastic Film
    Thanks to all who responded regarding removing the almost unremoveable plastic film from my flaperons. After a weeks worth of peeling and picking, here is what worked for me. I initially tried a heat gun, but the heat scared me. A calibrated iron was tried. I tried all the solvents suggested from the list plus more, all the solvents around the house. None of the solvents really worked. Denatured ethyl alcohol might have had a minor effect, but not enough to get the job done. Heat works, but must be carefully controlled. Our hot water heaters are set about 140 degrees F. I cannot keep my hands under the hot water spiggot. Figuring that 140 degrees or less is safe (since the epoxy is labeled to 250) I did a lot of switching the gun on and off and covering small areas (estimated 10 square inches) and kept my hands on the treated area. This is to report what worked for me. I used heat on only the most difficult areas, where crazing and cracks could be observed in the film. 80% of the film was removed by peeling very slowly and carefully. When I got to the tough parts, encouragement from my wife and the heat gun got me through it. The reward for perseverance and sore fingers is clean flaperons which are now attached to the Lite and (almost) ready to go. Charles Peterson


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:02 PM PST US
    From: Michael Gibbs <MichaelGibbs@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Weight & Balanace Program
    >It's on Merle's web site. >Pete ><http://murlewilliamsaviation.com/ads.html>http://murlewilliamsaviation.com/ads.html The site is right, the URL is wrong. It's on the downloads page (but I'm sure that Murle appreciates everyone looking at his ads, too!): http://murlewilliamsaviation.com/ads.html Mike G.


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Newbie with a prop ?
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    nick4853 wrote: > I've been lurking in the shadows for along time. I've been fascinated by this little airplane and all the talk. I am currently going for my light sport with 17.3 hrs down. So two weeks ago I saw a nice model iv on barnstormers with 102 hrs and a trailer I bit the bullet threw my money down and now I have N433R sitting in the shop. I've gone over it with a/p friend and everything looks good but the old gsc prop has got to go (5year, 500hr AD). I ordered a new warp tapper tip to go in front of the 912ul. My ? is what if anything do I have to do to keep the Faa happy. Is this considered major under Far 21.93 and if so what procedure is necessary to keep my certificate valid. > Thanks , > Nick Nick, first congratulations on new airplane. Excellent choice. The "Operating limitations", issued as part of the airworthiness certificate for your kitfox will explain when you must notify your local FSDO about changes to the airplane. Installing a different make prop is a major change. It probably says you must notify them in writing. I would give your local FSDO a call first and ask what they need/want from you. For what it is worth. Anyone can work on an experimental aircraft. The only signature needed in the aircraft log book is for the annual condition inspection. That must be signed by the original builder who holds a repairman's certificate for that plane with it's serial number or, an A&P mechanic. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182607#182607


    Message 48


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:29:57 PM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Newbie with a prop ?
    At 11:34 AM 5/11/2008, you wrote: >Is this considered major under Far 21.93 and if so what procedure is >necessary to keep my certificate valid. I agree with Tom, but you really should contact your local FSDO. Unfortunately there is a depressing lack of uniformity within the FAA, and you should probably please the folk who are going to be doing the inspection when you crash. (Actually I think it's the NTSB that does the inspecting, but the FAA might be there too.) Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 49


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:29:57 PM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: gps
    At 08:16 AM 5/11/2008, you wrote: >When I get there (re-fit) where would I look for modular info. There's no info, you get to make it up yourself. >:-} I will cut out sections of the existing panel that I think make sense from a maintenance standpoint. I will then reinforce the remainder of the panel to support itself and the cut out "modules". The modules will then be put back on, (or new plates made,) with hinges and all the wiring / tubing will be strain relieved at the hinge line. The opposite end will be fastened with a couple of fasteners, (or more,) the whole idea being that if I want to get behind the panel I can very easily. If I want to do a mod, I replace a flat panel plate, a fairly easy proposition. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 50


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:14:28 PM PST US
    From: James Shumaker <jimshumaker@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: Re: Newbie with a prop ?
    Nick A prop change requires a 5 hour fly off. This will give you a chance to get the pitch right and do the climb and cruise numbers for the pilots hand book. The 5 hours means no passengers and remaining within 25 miles of the airport. Also all the required torquing tracking and re-torquing needs to be completed and logged. The taper tip warp will fly much better than the GSC. More power and better climb. It was not required to have a re-inspection, only my sign off as the builder. Jim Shumaker ----- Original Message ---- From: nick4853 <nweiskopf@verizon.net> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 11:34:20 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Newbie with a prop ? I've been lurking in the shadows for along time. I've been fascinated by this little airplane and all the talk. I am currently going for my light sport with 17.3 hrs down. So two weeks ago I saw a nice model iv on barnstormers with 102 hrs and a trailer I bit the bullet threw my money down and now I have N433R sitting in the shop. I've gone over it with a/p friend and everything looks good but the old gsc prop has got to go (5year, 500hr AD). I ordered a new warp tapper tip to go in front of the 912ul. My ? is what if anything do I have to do to keep the Faa happy. Is this considered major under Far 21.93 and if so what procedure is necessary to keep my certificate valid. Thanks , Nick Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=182523#182523


    Message 51


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:26:51 PM PST US
    From: John Allen <kitfoxfugit@yahoo.com>
    Subject: finally i got my check ride, BUT.
    "From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Geir_Olav_=D8ien?= <geir_olav@c2i.net> Subject: Kitfox-List: finally i got my check ride, BUT. I got my check ride in my Kitfox IV (speedster!)yesterday. BUT I need some tip on landing this thing. When doing a 3 pointer, and stalls out 4=94 above ground, I easily bounces 2 feet into the air again." I think you are a little lower than you think you are, thus your mains are hitting the ground before you are stalled, causing the tail to come down abruptly, increasing the angle of attack, and throwing your nose back up into the air. A contributing factor may be that using flaps is reducing your ability to flare. In mine, it is difficult to get the tail down with flaps. I don't know about your tires or bungees, because I switched mine from bungees and square-shouldered trailer tires to Grove gear and 6:00 x 6 airplane tires, which tamed it. I don't think your approach speed is involved in your boouncing problem. I think mine stalls at about 45 IAS without flaps and without power. If I hit the ground in mine and bounce, I just hold the stick full back and keep on landing. If I drop it in, I do the same thing. Once you learn where the ground plane is and quit using flaps so you can flare properly, you should not have that problem any more. That takes lots of practice. After you master that, you can try it with flaps. JA Kitfox IV Speedster Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --