Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     0. 12:05 AM - Fund Raiser Lagging Last Year By Over 30%...  (Matt Dralle)
     1. 05:54 AM - Re: Re: Performance mods for 582. (Jose M. Toro)
     2. 06:03 AM - 582 Clutch (rawheels)
     3. 06:20 AM - Re: Performance mods for 582. (LarryM)
     4. 06:50 AM - Re: Re: Performance mods for 582. (Bob Brennan)
     5. 06:55 AM - Re: Performance mods for 582. (Catz631@aol.com)
     6. 07:09 AM - Re: 582 Clutch (akflyer)
     7. 07:25 AM - More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Perkins, Mike)
     8. 07:37 AM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Bob Brennan)
     9. 07:43 AM - Re: Re: Performance mods for 582. (Lowell Fitt)
    10. 08:25 AM - Re: [!! SPAM] 582 Clutch (Guy Buchanan)
    11. 08:25 AM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Guy Buchanan)
    12. 11:22 AM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (mikeperkins)
    13. 12:14 PM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (akflyer)
    14. 01:23 PM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (mikeperkins)
    15. 01:55 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Dave G)
    16. 01:59 PM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (akflyer)
    17. 02:02 PM - Re: Performance mods for 582. (LarryM)
    18. 02:39 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Ron Liebmann)
    19. 04:07 PM - Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (akflyer)
    20. 04:39 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Dave G)
    21. 05:40 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Sbennett3@aol.com)
    22. 06:33 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (john taylor)
    23. 06:34 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Lynn Matteson)
    24. 06:51 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Sbennett3@aol.com)
    25. 08:28 PM - Re: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 (Lynn Matteson)
 
 
 
Message 0
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fund Raiser Lagging Last Year By Over 30%...  | 
      
      
      As of the 13th, the Fund Raiser is currently about 30% behind last year in terms
      of the number of Contributions.  Yet, oddly the number of messages posted per
      day is up by 10 to 20% on the average.  It costs real money to run these Lists
      and they are supported 100% though your Contributions during the Fund Raiser.
      Won't you please take a minute right now to make your Contribution to keep
      these Lists up and running? 
      
      Contribution Page: 
      
                 http://www.matronics.com/contribution 
      
      Thank you for your support! 
      
      Matt Dralle 
      Email List Admin. 
      
      
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      I know this guy, Marcelo Matocq who flew, back in 1998, a 582 powered, sing
      le seater-Flighstar from Argentina to Oskosh.- He stayed at my home in 
      Puerto Rico during his trip.- That historic trip appeared in Ultralight F
      lying magazine and EAA Experimeter.- He had no problem with the engine du
      ring the trip.- Seems to me like flying "out of the pattern" with a 582 i
      s definitely an option.=0A=0AAbout modifying the 582 for performance, I abs
      olutely agree with Bradley, that's the last thing I'd want to do.- You wi
      ll sacrify reliability for performance.=0A=0AJose=0AEx KF II/582 (never had
       a problem with the engine in 10 years)=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_____________________
      ___________=0AFrom: Bradley Webb bmwebb@cox.net=0A-I don't trust the 582'
      s at all. I guess it's ok for very local putzing around,=0Abut I wouldn't g
      o anywhere with it.=0A=0AGo where you want, but mod'ing the 582 is the LAST
       thing I'd want to do. =0AMy .02=0ABradley=0A=0A-----Original Message-----
      =0AFrom: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com=0A[mailto:owner-kitfox-list
      -server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of tjmxer=0ASent: Thursday, November 13, 2
      008 7:37 PM=0ATo: kitfox-list@matronics.com=0ASubject: Kitfox-List: Re: Per
      mxer@hotmail.com>=0A=0ACome on. Is the 582 really that bad? Is the 912 that
       much better?=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums
      .matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214021#214021=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
      ========0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Where is a good place to purchase a clutch assy for the 582 C-Box?  I've seen RK-400's
      listed online and a R5000 (whatever that is) at LEAF for around $500.
      Wondering which is better, and if they include everything needed to make the
      conversion.
      
      --------
      Ryan Wheeler
      Kitfox IV-1200
      Indianapolis, IN
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214168#214168
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      
      When is the last time you saw any engine go beyond its TBO without work done to
      it?  The 582 has a low TBO in part due to the anticipated low usage and associated
      problems resulting from that.  I know of a guy on the Avid group list who
      has over 600 hrs on each of his 582s.  They were both running fine when he tore
      them down for a look.  He did find some main bearing cage wear, and and now
      recommends that perhaps between 300 and 600 would be prudent.  Even Rotax admits
      that the 300hr TBO is conservative. (someone mentioned liability earlier).
      How many certified engines go over 500 hrs with no cylinder work, etc?  Talk
      to the guys who fly their 582's, and know them.  For the performance/price/reliability
      factors  I plan to replace mine with another if/when that time comes.
      IMO the problems with the 582 are mostly related to operator or lack of operation.
      When I first got my airplane, engine replacement is what was on my mind
      for the 1st yr.  This was all due to my prejudiced thoughts of poor reliability.
      Six years latter I have the same engine with very little work (no failures)
      done/needed.  (You realize that I've just doomed myself!) 
      
      larry
      Avid -582
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214173#214173
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      
      I'll jump in for a little doom myself, and hopefully add to the list of real
      facts rather than just opinions.
      
      My KFII has been flying since 1991 with the same 582, with over 800
      accumulated hours. I am the 5th owner and have flown it for nearly 100 hours
      myself, with nearly 2 years of "down time" due to problems importing it from
      the UK and the FAA. The 582 had a complete rebuild at a little under 600
      hours and had 125 hours on it when I bought it. The logbooks do not have a
      single instance of repair needed since new (other than maintenance items of
      course), and the Brits are pretty strict about recording anything and
      everything.
      
      I have recently obtained my LSA Repairman's Certificate and between that new
      knowledge and this list I am checking into everything I can on both the
      engine and airframe, both for safety sake and with my new certificate
      because I *can*, legally ;-)
      
      I have found/repaired very little other than brakes, door lifter tubes,
      crazed Lexan windscreen, and some paintwork that the FAA insisted on; all
      fixed with the amazing help of the Kitfoxers on this list. Nothing to do
      with the 582 as yet other than concerns over ethanol in the mogas I use.
      
      Not to be long-winded (too late!), my opinion and facts, my 2 pence - my 582
      is reliable and efficient and if anything a bit over-powered for my very
      light model II. But hey, you can't have too much money, or sex, or thrust
      right?
      
      Bob Brennan - N717GB 
      1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
      Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
      Wrightsville Pa  
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryM
      Sent: 14 November 2008 9:20 am
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Performance mods for 582.
      
      
      When is the last time you saw any engine go beyond its TBO without work done
      to it?  The 582 has a low TBO in part due to the anticipated low usage and
      associated problems resulting from that.  I know of a guy on the Avid group
      list who has over 600 hrs on each of his 582s.  They were both running fine
      when he tore them down for a look.  He did find some main bearing cage wear,
      and and now recommends that perhaps between 300 and 600 would be prudent.
      Even Rotax admits that the 300hr TBO is conservative. (someone mentioned
      liability earlier).  How many certified engines go over 500 hrs with no
      cylinder work, etc?  Talk to the guys who fly their 582's, and know them.
      For the performance/price/reliability factors  I plan to replace mine with
      another if/when that time comes.  IMO the problems with the 582 are mostly
      related to operator or lack of operation.  When I first got my airplane,
      engine replacement is what was on my mind for the 1st yr.  This was all due
      to my prejudic!
       ed thoughts of poor reliability.  Six years latter I have the same engine
      with very little work (no failures) done/needed.  (You realize that I've
      just doomed myself!) 
      
      larry
      Avid -582
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214173#214173
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      Gary and Leonard
        Thank you for the info on the 582's. I thought both you guys did a great 
      job on the pro's and cons. I have a great interest in engines and had a two 
      stroke in my 1962 SAAB a while back(a long while !) I loved that car and stupid
      me 
      I traded it for a Renault Dauphine (which I soon got rid of ) I added a quart 
      of oil at each gas fill to the SAAB.Super car and I sure would like to have 
      another one
        I have a 912UL in my Fox 4 and it runs great and I think I have the minor 
      bugs worked out but I still do not like flying over any water with it ! (ie: 
      Mobile Bay last weekend) Would I fly it to my cabin in NC about 450 miles away
      
      -no. I guess it is just a gut feeling (after three engine failures in other 
      aircraft-one going straight up at 200ft agl) Any way ,I digress.
       I have toyed with another project but have always disregarded the two 
      strokes as unreliable. Now I am not so sure. Lockwood has a good two stroke school
      . 
      Maybe I will go just to learn more about them. Thanks guys!
                              
                                                              Dick Maddux
                                                              Fox 4-1200
                                                              Pensacola,Fl 
      **************Get movies delivered to your mailbox. One month free from 
      blockbuster.com 
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I have an RK 400 I think it was 525 or something like that.  comes with all you
      need to bolt it on.  It only takes about an hour to do the swap if you are mechanically
      inclined and can read simple directions.
      
      --------
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      Leonard Perry
      Soldotna AK
      Avid "C" / Mk IV 
      582 IVO IFA
      Full Lotus 1260
      As done as any plane will ever be.... cause now the tinkeritis takes over.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214186#214186
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      I have a paper copy of a report from Denmark published in 1991
      concerning 2-cycle aircraft engine reliability, including the 503, 532,
      and 582. The report was a summary of a study done by Denmark's
      equivalent of our FAA and contained plain clear facts, not that usual
      whitewashed stuff we're used to getting from our FAA. The study was
      initiated because of the high number of 2-cycle-related U/L accidents in
      Denmark. In the next few days, I'll scan it. Anyone wishing a copy of
      this report can request an electronic copy by sending an email to
      flybyewire@gmail.com . 
      
      Mike Perkins
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      I'll take a copy please Mike, and thanks for doing this. Presumably there
      have been mods to the 582 since the report was published and the models in
      question pre-dated 1991 by several years, so we should take the results in
      light of any improvements(?) It should be an interesting read regardless. 
      
      
      Bob Brennan - N717GB 
      1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox
      Rotax 582 with 3 blade prop
      Wrightsville Pa 
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Perkins, Mike
      Sent: 14 November 2008 10:25 am
      Subject: Kitfox-List: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for
      582
      
      
      I have a paper copy of a report from Denmark published in 1991 concerning
      2-cycle aircraft engine reliability, including the 503, 532, and 582. The
      report was a summary of a study done by Denmark's equivalent of our FAA and
      contained plain clear facts, not that usual whitewashed stuff we're used to
      getting from our FAA. The study was initiated because of the high number of
      2-cycle-related U/L accidents in Denmark. In the next few days, I'll scan
      it. Anyone wishing a copy of this report can request an electronic copy by
      sending an email to flybyewire@gmail.com . 
      
      Mike Perkins
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      
      I have never owned a 582, but the group I flew with for five years had one 
      582 in the flight of 6.  These flights were to the back country of Idaho 
      with incursions into Montana to the east and Washingrton west and once into 
      Canada - oops.  In other words there was nothing off limits.  The goal was 
      to land at as many remote airstrips as possible over the years.
      
      These are my observations:  Every fuel stop the cowl was off.  Presumably to 
      check the oil level.  When possible, we flew along highways and the 582 guy 
      didn't cut the corners as we sometimes did.  Often we were over extremely 
      rugged terrain and the 912 guys could outclimb the 582 and we would often 
      watch him catch the ridge lifts and guide him as he climbed through the 
      canyons.  Coyote Creek, Moos Creek, Fish Lake, Smiley Creek (7100 ft.), 
      Stanley, Dixie Town, Sulfur Creek, Elk River, Cavanaugh Bay, Sullivan Lake, 
      Westfork, and ten more and this was the 2002 trip.  The 582 performed 
      flawlessly.  In my opinion, it is a fine engine.  My understanding is that 
      it takes a bit more care and attention, but if a person is willing to do 
      that, I don't see a problem.
      
      I have good friends who won't fly in light planes, a family member that 
      won't fly in any airplane, Period - she won't cook with a microwave oven 
      either. There is something scary about both, so someone who won't fly behind 
      a 582 is not unusual in my experience.  To each his own, I guess.
      
      Lowell Fitt
      Cameron Park, CA
      Model IV-1200 R-912 UL Build
      Currently focusing on the Left Wing, Rudder Gap Seal Cuffs and Landing Gear 
      Fairing
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "LarryM" <CrownLJ@verizon.net>
      Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:19 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Performance mods for 582.
      
      
      >
      > When is the last time you saw any engine go beyond its TBO without work 
      > done to it?  The 582 has a low TBO in part due to the anticipated low 
      > usage and associated problems resulting from that.  I know of a guy on the 
      > Avid group list who has over 600 hrs on each of his 582s.  They were both 
      > running fine when he tore them down for a look.  He did find some main 
      > bearing cage wear, and and now recommends that perhaps between 300 and 600 
      > would be prudent.  Even Rotax admits that the 300hr TBO is conservative. 
      > (someone mentioned liability earlier).  How many certified engines go over 
      > 500 hrs with no cylinder work, etc?  Talk to the guys who fly their 582's, 
      > and know them.  For the performance/price/reliability factors  I plan to 
      > replace mine with another if/when that time comes.  IMO the problems with 
      > the 582 are mostly related to operator or lack of operation.  When I first 
      > got my airplane, engine replacement is what was on my mind for the 1st yr. 
      > This was all due to my prejudic!
      > ed thoughts of poor reliability.  Six years latter I have the same engine 
      > with very little work (no failures) done/needed.  (You realize that I've 
      > just doomed myself!)
      >
      > larry
      > Avid -582
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214173#214173
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      At 06:02 AM 11/14/2008, you wrote:
      >Where is a good place to purchase a clutch assy for the 582 
      >C-Box?  I've seen RK-400's listed online and a R5000 (whatever that 
      >is) at LEAF for around $500.  Wondering which is better, and if they 
      >include everything needed to make the conversion.
      
      Ryan,
               I've never heard of an R5000. Is it new? The RK400 is, 
      I  believe, made by these guys: www.air-techinc.com. There you will 
      find it and parts and some support. The only problem I have with it, 
      is that no-one, including the manufacturer, with whom I've spoken, 
      seems to know the TBO. And there is no way to observe a wear limit 
      other than to occasionally disassemble the clutch. It's something I'm 
      still working on.
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance   mods for | 
      582
      
      At 07:24 AM 11/14/2008, you wrote:
      >I have a paper copy of a report from Denmark published in 1991 
      >concerning 2-cycle aircraft engine reliability, including the 503, 
      >532, and 582. The report was a summary of a study done by Denmark's 
      >equivalent of our FAA and contained plain clear facts, not that 
      >usual whitewashed stuff we're used to getting from our FAA. The 
      >study was initiated because of the high number of 2-cycle-related 
      >U/L accidents in Denmark.
      
               Yes, a lot has changed since 1991. For the 582, the ignition 
      system, charge system, crankshaft, pin end bearings, and cooling 
      system were upgraded. It became understood that you couldn't run the 
      water temp over 180F, and EGT's over 1200. Digital engine monitors 
      came on line to help assure you stay within limits. They discovered 
      that if silicate-free coolant was used the rotary valve seal would 
      last to TBO. Finally, the community migrated from the devil-may-care 
      days of ultra-lighting to more conservative use in larger aircraft. 
      Fortunately guys like Mike Stratman at CPS documented their 
      ultra-light experience extensively, making it much simpler now to 
      operate and diagnose any Rotax 2-stroke. For the 582 the hard work 
      has been done, work that Lynn and others are presently doing for the 
      Jabiru, and which to some extent is still going on for the 912. (Note 
      that I'm not slamming either engine, just making an observation. I 
      will probably be switching to the 912 eventually, because I want more 
      climb in the hot / high / and heavy conditions in which I frequently fly.)
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      
      When you take a look at the report, you may be able to judge for yourself if Rotax
      addressed any of the issue.  A person might determine that many of the accidents
      and incidents could be traced to engine installation, engine maintenance,
      and engine/pilot procedures. In my mind, there is an interesting correlation
      between the high stoppage/accident rates and fact that Rotax manuals didn't
      specify engine use procedures, i.e. warm-up requirements, and they didn't specify
      explicit maintenance procedures, i.e. mandatory engine tear-down and inspection
      after an engine seizure for any reason. There was also a Finnish report
      in 1992 (of significantly less depth than the Danish report) and there was some
      reporting also done by Kitplanes in 1991-2. Notice that the two countries that
      produced reports have rather chilly climates throughout their entire countries,
      if that's any sort of a clue. As a technical counselor I've given presentations
      to EAA groups about Rotax engines. So of course I've drawn my own conclusions
      (based on the reported data and other sources), but I'd like to hear your
      conclusions after you read the report. - Mike
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214232#214232
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      
      I would like to see the report also.
      
      I would have to say that you are not entirely accurate on the manufacture not giving
      specific instructions on tear down or maintenance schedule.  If a person
      does not have the intellect to determine that the jug needs to be pulled when
      they squeak a piston, then they do not have the required decision making skill
      necessary to keep them alive in the cockpit.  I say those need to be weeded
      out and given a Darwin award...
      
      The rotax installation, maintenance, operation and rebuild manuals give you all
      the information you need to keep it alive and happy.  Should you choose not to
      read the manuals, or perform required maintenance or checks then a Darwin award
      in probably in your near future.
      
      --------
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      Leonard Perry
      Soldotna AK
      Avid "C" / Mk IV 
      582 IVO IFA
      Full Lotus 1260
      As done as any plane will ever be.... cause now the tinkeritis takes over.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214241#214241
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      
      Leonard, 
      It sounds like you are already be an expert in caring for a 2-cycle. But I imagine
      there may be a number of people who aren't. A pilot of a type-certificated
      aircraft can get engine help and advice at nearly any FBO. But the same isn't
      true of aircraft with 2-cycle engines. Please feel free to hand out Darwin awards
      if you wish. In the meantime, I'm interested in helping others who wish to
      learn more about their engines. 
      Mike
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214247#214247
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      
      The same can be said of the 912 and to some extent the Jabiru. While it 
      would be silly to argue the succes of the 912, most FBO's do not regard it 
      as a mainline aircraft engine and cannot offer any advice. The 582 has an 
      enviable record of reliability when operated properly. It takes a little 
      education, but then again so did flying.
      
      I think those who sneer at two strokes need to remember that in the eyes of 
      the general aviation community, Kitfoxes are mere toys, not aircraft. You 
      feel that's not true or fair I expect. So perhaps for those flying 912's it 
      might be better to accept that the 582 is just another engine and lay off.
      
      do not archive
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "mikeperkins" <michael.perkins@rauland.com>
      Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:23 PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods 
      for 582
      
      
      > <michael.perkins@rauland.com>
      >
      > Leonard,
      > It sounds like you are already be an expert in caring for a 2-cycle. But I 
      > imagine there may be a number of people who aren't. A pilot of a 
      > type-certificated aircraft can get engine help and advice at nearly any 
      > FBO. But the same isn't true of aircraft with 2-cycle engines. Please feel 
      > free to hand out Darwin awards if you wish. In the meantime, I'm 
      > interested in helping others who wish to learn more about their engines.
      > Mike
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214247#214247
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      
      http://www.800-airwolf.com/articles.htm
      
      Here you will find dang near everything you need to know about the rotax 2 strokes.
      
      My point made above is that the information is out there, rotax has manuals for
      the motors that take you from installation, to running to maintenance, to re-building
      and all points in between.  This info is readily available for downloading
      or for a few bucks you can buy it.  For 500 bucks you can go to the repairmans
      course and get your hands dirty.  With all these resources available, if
      a person chooses to ignore them and strike out on his own without learning his
      motor inside and out, and how to keep it alive, then he or she runs a high
      risk of earning the not so coveted Darwin award.
      
      You point out that the "typical" driver can get help at any FBO for a "normal"
      engine.  Your right, but if you are flying something unique like a 2 stoke, it
      is your duty to know all you can about your engine and not have to rely on others
      just as it is your duty to know about the airport you are planning to fly
      into.
      
      Articles written in the late 80's or early 90's or data compiled from that time
      frame should not be taken as gospel.  Rotax knew they had issues hence the mod
      99 582.  Allot of the 2 strokes have gotten a bad wrap from the early pioneers
      who would make a hardware store run, come home with conduit and bolt something
      resembling an ultralight together then go find a salvage snowmachine and bolt
      that POS engine in the nose and hope for the best.  Some were lucky some were
      not so lucky.
      
      I have seen allot of guys pull partial power and start a long decent.  This is
      a sure fire way to get the EGTs to shoot through the roof and make slag out of
      your pistons.  This is also addressed in the Rotax manual.  I see guys asking
      about jetting... this is addressed in the manual as well.  When do you need to
      change jets, well look at the temp chart.  check outside temps, cross reference
      the chart and jet away.  Most places, you can get by with 2 sets of jets due
      to temps.
      
      It is not my intention to belittle anyone as I am well aware not everyone grew
      up running 2 strokes, but I see alot of guys giving opinions, not facts about
      2 strokes that are not warranted and often lead others to make bad choices.
      
      Just for giggles, how many service bulletins have come out on the 912 from Rotax.
      This highly coveted engine is not immune to issues that will also leave you
      in a tight spot so the direct answer is not to just say 2 strokes are the only
      engines prone to failure, there for, bolt a 4 stroke in the nose and you will
      never have to worry about a dead stick again.  I bet Lowell could shed some
      light on that one......
      
      --------
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      Leonard Perry
      Soldotna AK
      Avid "C" / Mk IV 
      582 IVO IFA
      Full Lotus 1260
      As done as any plane will ever be.... cause now the tinkeritis takes over.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214249#214249
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Performance mods for 582. | 
      
      
      Any, any mechanical thing [u]will,  fail, it's just of matter or when or where
      you are at the time.  I always fly prepared for when it fail, whether it be 2
      stroke, or 4, or jet engine - they will all fail.
      
      larry
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214254#214254
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      
      Seems to me that Mr. Perry is a true know-it-all.  But, then again he may be 
      a newby to the 582/aircraft use time. I can say 100% that when I got my 582 
      in August of 1990, it came with NO manuals, no warnings,   nada!  I had been 
      flying for 32 years behind Continentals, Lycombings and Franklins without 
      even a burp. So, you have branded me and all the very early Kitfox owners as 
      deserving the Darwin Award. How generous of you, Mr. Perry. I have a strong 
      feeling that you have passed out many of these awards in your lifetime. When 
      one is 100% up to speed on aircraft 4 strokes and then purchases a 582, 
      there are things to learn. Back in the 80's & early 90's we learned on our 
      own. When I called Rotax in Canada about a problem I was having, I was told 
      by them to find a repair guy somewhere in the states and ask them my 
      questions.
      I suggest that Mr. Perry learn some diplomacy if he wishes to earn any 
      respect on this list.
      
      DO NOT ARCHIVE        Sign me "offended"      Ron
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
      Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:14 PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods 
      for 582
      
      
      >
      > I would like to see the report also.
      >
      > I would have to say that you are not entirely accurate on the manufacture 
      > not giving specific instructions on tear down or maintenance schedule.  If 
      > a person does not have the intellect to determine that the jug needs to be 
      > pulled when they squeak a piston, then they do not have the required 
      > decision making skill necessary to keep them alive in the cockpit.  I say 
      > those need to be weeded out and given a Darwin award...
      >
      > The rotax installation, maintenance, operation and rebuild manuals give 
      > you all the information you need to keep it alive and happy.  Should you 
      > choose not to read the manuals, or perform required maintenance or checks 
      > then a Darwin award in probably in your near future.
      >
      > --------
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      > Leonard Perry
      > Soldotna AK
      > Avid "C" / Mk IV
      > 582 IVO IFA
      > Full Lotus 1260
      > As done as any plane will ever be.... cause now the tinkeritis takes over.
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214241#214241
      >
      >
      > 
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582 | 
      
      
      Sorry to have offended you.  I don't pretend to "know it all" about 2 strokes,
      but I do know where to look for information.  I have seen countless times people
      replying to a question with "do a search on the list as this has been hashed
      over many times" ( and it pi$$es me off as someone was just asking a question).
      I simply stated that all this information is out there and is readily available
      through a simple google search or by using any other search engine,  I
      even provided a link to help one out) and that if you choose not to learn what
      is available, then perhaps the light bulb is not burning at full rated intensity.
      
      Rotax now has manuals out, and they can be downloaded from MANY online sites. 
      I myself should have been handed a darwin award many times, I am not exempt from
      this dubious catagory.
      
      Again, sorry to have offended anyone without a sense of humor. It was not my intention.
      
      I will keep my mouth shut and fingers off the key board on this subject from now
      on.
      
      --------
      DO NOT ARCHIVE
      Leonard Perry
      Soldotna AK
      Avid "C" / Mk IV 
      582 IVO IFA
      Full Lotus 1260
      As done as any plane will ever be.... cause now the tinkeritis takes over.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=214281#214281
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
      Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:06 PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods 
      for 582
      
      
      >
      > I will keep my mouth shut and fingers off the key board on this subject 
      > from now on.
      >
      > --------
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      Please don't. I don't always agree with everything I see here but the 582 
      discussion interests me greatly. There is a vast difference between  a 
      posting that happens to offend and one that sets out to and it's generally 
      obvious. If someone chooses to be offended when it was not intended, it 
      usually shows. I enjoy and am very interested in the experiences of people 
      who actually fly 582's. 
      
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      I love my 912. I changed the oil and antifreeze today. It took  me 45 
      minutes. When I change the oil I always crack the safety off the  gascolator and
      
      check for sed... 980 hrs on the hobbs... I had a flat tire last  week, so I bolted
      
      that up today also.  Hey guys, 90% of us fly our little  birds with rotax 
      engines... Can't we all play on the same team???  
      Steve Bennett classic4/1200  NC    do  not archive
      
      
      In a message dated 11/14/2008 7:40:46 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
      occom@ns.sympatico.ca writes:
      
      -->  Kitfox-List message posted by: "Dave G"  <occom@ns.sympatico.ca>
      
      
      ----- Original Message -----  
      From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
      Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:06  PM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance  mods 
      for 582
      
      
      >
      > I will keep my mouth shut and fingers  off the key board on this subject 
      > from now on.
      >
      >  --------
      > DO NOT ARCHIVE
      
      Please don't. I don't always agree with  everything I see here but the 582 
      discussion interests me greatly. There  is a vast difference between  a 
      posting that happens to offend and  one that sets out to and it's generally 
      obvious. If someone chooses to be  offended when it was not intended, it 
      usually shows. I enjoy and am very  interested in the experiences of people 
      who actually fly 582's.  
      
      
      **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & 
      p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)
      
Message 22
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      come on, guys; dont stop over a lil disagreement. i've read-many posts fr
      om both of u & have found u to be very, experienced, knowledgeable, & passi
      onate about aviating in-these homebuilts. for me, who-still has to make
       a decision on an engine for my avid+ (airdale), ur posts are invaluable. t
      hanks for taking the time & effort to share with us. lookin forward to more
       from u all, john bowman, prairieville, la.--=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A___________
      _____________________=0AFrom: Dave G <occom@ns.sympatico.ca>=0ATo: kitfox-l
      ist@matronics.com=0ASent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:38:39 PM=0ASubject: R
      e: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for 582
      =0A=0A=0A----- Original Message ----- From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.c
      om>=0ATo: <kitfox-list@matronics.com>=0ASent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:0
      6 PM=0ASubject: Kitfox-List: Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance
       mods for 582=0A=0A=0A> =0A> I will keep my mouth shut and fingers off the 
      key board on this subject from now on.=0A> =0A> --------=0A> DO NOT ARCHIVE
      =0A=0APlease don't. I don't always agree with everything I see here but the
       582 discussion interests me greatly. There is a vast difference between-
       a posting that happens to offend and one that sets out to and it's general
      ly obvious. If someone chooses to be offended when it was not intended, it 
      usually shows. I enjoy and am very interested in the experiences of people 
      ===========0A=0A=0A      
      
Message 23
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      
      And if you can't get along with fellow Rotax drivers, come on over to  
      the Jabiru camp. We don't have the numbers...yet...but we've got all  
      4-strokes, so no gripes in that department.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      Jabiru 2200, 587hrs
      Sensenich 62x46
      flying again after rebuild, and new Electroair direct-fire ignition  
      system
      do not archive
      
      
      On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Sbennett3@aol.com wrote:
      
      > I love my 912. I changed the oil and antifreeze today. It took me  
      > 45 minutes. When I change the oil I always crack the safety off the  
      > gascolator and check for sed... 980 hrs on the hobbs... I had a  
      > flat tire last week, so I bolted that up today also.  Hey guys, 90%  
      > of us fly our little birds with rotax engines... Can't we all play  
      > on the same team???
      > Steve Bennett classic4/1200  NC    do not archive
      
      
Message 24
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      Come on Lynn... I remember a forced landing and rebuild just a  couple months 
      back so don't let us rotax guys aim our guns at you...   :-)  Steve Bennett
        Do not archive 
      
      
      In a message dated 11/14/2008 9:35:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
      lynnmatt@jps.net writes:
      
      -->  Kitfox-List message posted by: Lynn Matteson  <lynnmatt@jps.net>
      
      And if you can't get along with fellow Rotax  drivers, come on over to  
      the Jabiru camp. We don't have the  numbers...yet...but we've got all  
      4-strokes, so no gripes in that  department.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      Jabiru  2200, 587hrs
      Sensenich 62x46
      flying again after rebuild, and new  Electroair direct-fire ignition  
      system
      do not  archive
      
      
      On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Sbennett3@aol.com  wrote:
      
      > I love my 912. I changed the oil and antifreeze today. It  took me  
      > 45 minutes. When I change the oil I always crack the  safety off the  
      > gascolator and check for sed... 980 hrs on the  hobbs... I had a  
      > flat tire last week, so I bolted that up today  also.  Hey guys, 90%  
      > of us fly our little birds with rotax  engines... Can't we all play  
      > on the same team???
      > Steve  Bennett classic4/1200  NC    do not  archive
      
      
      **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & 
      p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)
      
Message 25
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: More on 2-cyle reliability - - Performance mods for | 
      582
      
      
      I'm not saying that didn't happen....just that honestly prevails (at  
      least in my section of the camp), and it seems like when we are  
      sticking up for "our brand" sometimes we overlook the failures and  
      brag about the victories. Hell, for several weeks there, after the  
      "engine out", you couldn't get me to mention my brand, let alone brag  
      about it. But failures do happen, and if we're gonna fly, we'd better  
      learn to live with that fact. Now if I have a second outage, I may  
      have to rethink my choice, but it will never be a 2-stroke, and never  
      be a high-revving engine. I just don't like the high revs.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      Jabiru 2200, 587hrs
      Sensenich 62x46
      flying again after rebuild, and new Electroair direct-fire ignition  
      system
      do not archive
      
      
      On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Sbennett3@aol.com wrote:
      
      > Come on Lynn... I remember a forced landing and rebuild just a  
      > couple months back so don't let us rotax guys aim our guns at  
      > you...  :-)  Steve Bennett
      >   Do not archive
      >
      > In a message dated 11/14/2008 9:35:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
      > lynnmatt@jps.net writes:
      >
      > And if you can't get along with fellow Rotax drivers, come on over to
      > the Jabiru camp. We don't have the numbers...yet...but we've got all
      > 4-strokes, so no gripes in that department.
      >
      > Lynn Matteson
      > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      > Jabiru 2200, 587hrs
      > Sensenich 62x46
      > flying again after rebuild, and new Electroair direct-fire ignition
      > system
      > do not archive
      >
      >
      > On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Sbennett3@aol.com wrote:
      >
      > > I love my 912. I changed the oil and antifreeze today. It took me
      > > 45 minutes. When I change the oil I always crack the safety off the
      > > gascolator and check for sed... 980 hrs on the hobbs... I had a
      > > flat tire last week, so I bolted that up today also.  Hey guys, 90%
      > > of us fly our little birds with rotax engines... Can't we all play
      > > on the same team???
      > > Steve Bennett classic4/1200  NC    do not sp;          (And Get  
      > Some AWESOME FREE find you for                     -Matt Dralle,  
      > List he es y              - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS  
      > ========================
      >
      >
      > Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & more!
      > ===========================================================
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |