Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Wed 11/19/08


Total Messages Posted: 21



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:21 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Catz631@aol.com)
     2. 05:35 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (LarryM)
     3. 05:45 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (LarryM)
     4. 08:23 AM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Guy Buchanan)
     5. 08:56 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Guy Buchanan)
     6. 08:56 AM - TruTrak ADI Autopilot II (kitfoxjim)
     7. 09:47 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Guy Buchanan)
     8. 10:16 AM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
     9. 11:22 AM - Re: Windshield fit (Weiss Richard)
    10. 11:41 AM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
    11. 11:50 AM - Re: A Fun Flight (Tom Jones)
    12. 12:01 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    13. 02:40 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (gary.algate@sandvik.com)
    14. 02:42 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (gary.algate@sandvik.com)
    15. 04:01 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    16. 04:15 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    17. 06:06 PM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
    18. 07:26 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Guy Buchanan)
    19. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    20. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (patrick reilly)
    21. 09:29 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (patrick reilly)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:21:16 AM PST US
    From: Catz631@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke.
    Paul, That is all well and true that another engine can get you to the scene of the crash if the first one fails but I am reminded of a few occasions when I was glad to have the others. One was over the pacific when we lost an engine in a P-3. I knew 3 engines would take us home. Another was when I was a new engineer for a major and flying a DC10 to London from Houston. We were far over the Atlantic and heard a call from a B767 with a full load of passengers that was diverting to Iceland because of an engine failure. His voice was rather high pitched as you can imagine. (glad we had 3 and wish I could have given him one) The worst one was loosing two engines on a DC6 (1 and 3) prior to even reaching 2000 ft! On that one I was riding in the back. After landing I congratulated two very pale white pilots on a job well done. I was learning to fly this aircraft and asked them if this was standard operation in this aircraft.(loosing two) With all of that said, I too leave the throttle alone when I have to fly over a large body of water with no other way of getting there. (glancing at a good magazine article also helps) Dick Maddux Fox 4 Pensacola,Fl **************You Rock! One month of free movies delivered by mail from blockbuster.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke.
    From: "LarryM" <CrownLJ@verizon.net>
    >From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul schedule that Rotax publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there after, crank replacement bases on 60% wear, no time/hr limit. Details see http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rotax-2-stroke-exemption-application.pdf larry Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215121#215121 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/sa_582_maintenance_schedule_687.pdf


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:45:58 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke.
    From: "LarryM" <CrownLJ@verizon.net>
    Also from SA: Rotax reliability facts: Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215122#215122 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/rotax_stats_159.jpg


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:23:22 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    At 06:34 PM 11/18/2008, you wrote: >You mention leaning as you climbed. do you have the Arctic Sparrow >cockpit adjustable needles? No, I have the HACman system that varies the float bowl pressure to achieve moderate leaning. I like it a lot. >Also can you Tell more about the slam dunk method of descending to >keep the EGT's in line? With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise throttle. It drives them crazy! Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:56:42 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke.
    At 05:34 AM 11/19/2008, you wrote: > >From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul > schedule that Rotax publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there > after, crank replacement bases on 60% wear, no time/hr limit. Details see This is AMAZING, Larry. I checked their website (http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/?p=469) and found that the request is expected to be approved. I loved the letter because of the statistics in the appendix. It's the best information on 582's I've ever seen. Thanks, Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:56:49 AM PST US
    Subject: TruTrak ADI Autopilot II
    From: "kitfoxjim" <jim@franchise-u.com>
    Read post about ADI autopilot, but does anyone have any drawings or pics on how to hook up the servos to the flight controls in a Vixen? What brakets, etc needs to be made? I think I have everything figured out except controll/servo hookup. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215141#215141


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:47:11 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke.
    At 05:34 AM 11/19/2008, you wrote: > From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul > schedule that Rotax publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there > after, crank replacement bases on 60% wear, no time/hr limit. Details see > >http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rotax-2-stroke-exemption-application.pdf Larry, I have attached a plot of the number of engines in each group of 100 hours, (i.e. 0-100, 100-200, etc.) These are the hours 582s in South Africa have flown without crank replacement or major overhaul. I'm trying to figure out the number of hours one can fly with a 97% chance of no-crank-failure based on this data, but my statistical mathematics is rusty. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:50 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net>
    Rick, Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out great. -------- Darin Hawkes Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) 914 Turbo Kaysville, Utah Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:22:08 AM PST US
    From: Weiss Richard <MDKitfox@aol.com>
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    Darin, I looked at the photos and honestly, you did an outstanding job! The listers ought to take a look at these photos. I'm encouraged. If mine turn out half as good I'd be pleased. Thanks, Rick Weiss N39RW Series V Speedster, 912ULS SkyStar S/N 1 Port Orange, FL On Nov 19, 2008, at 1:16 PM, darinh wrote: > > Rick, > > Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will > turn out great. > > -------- > Darin Hawkes > Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) > 914 Turbo > Kaysville, Utah > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:41:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net>
    Rick, Thanks for the compliments...I am pretty please with how the turned out. I had put this part off for a couple months and went the tape route but with the temps dropping (and an incident where a peice of tape came loose and gave me quite a scare) I decided that now was as good as any to make the fairings. Fiberglass is a great medium to work with...just make sure you protect the area you are working and make sure you have a good release agent (brown packaging tape in this instance). Clean up any epoxy drips before it cures also. Have fun. -------- Darin Hawkes Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) 914 Turbo Kaysville, Utah Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215168#215168


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:18 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    > With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise > throttle. It drives them crazy! > Guy Buchanan Thanks for the reply Guy. I have the adjustable "Sparrow needles" and am still learning how to use them to keep the EGT's under control in a descent with partial power. It is easy...for me anyhow...to get confused and forget how many turns on the needle adjustments I have made then which way to turn the knobs to correct a rough engine when I get it out of wack. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215170#215170


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:01:41 PM PST US
    From: kerrjohna@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    Darin, good looking fairings John Kerr -------------- Original message -------------- From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> > > Rick, > > Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out > great. > > -------- > Darin Hawkes > Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) > 914 Turbo > Kaysville, Utah > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 > > > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg > > > > > > > <html><body> <DIV>Darin, good looking fairings</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>John Kerr</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: "darinh" &lt;gerns25@netscape.net&gt; <BR><BR>&gt; --&gt; Kitfox-List message posted by: "darinh" <GERNS25@NETSCAPE.NET><BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Rick, <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out <BR>&gt; great. <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; -------- <BR>&gt; Darin Hawkes <BR>&gt; Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) <BR>&gt; 914 Turbo <BR>&gt; Kaysville, Utah <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Read this topic online here: <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Attachments: <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg <BR>&gt; http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg <BR>&gt; http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt ; <BR> more: <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre></body></html>


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:40:34 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    From: gary.algate@sandvik.com
    Dean you did a really nice job of those fairings Gary Algate Classic 4 jab 2200 This e-mail is confidential and it is intended only for the addressees. Any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail and delete the message from your system. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which may arise as a result of the e-mail transmission. "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> Sent by: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com 20/11/2008 04:53 AM Please respond to kitfox-list@matronics.com To kitfox-list@matronics.com cc Subject Kitfox-List: Re: Windshield fit Rick, Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out great. -------- Darin Hawkes Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) 914 Turbo Kaysville, Utah Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    From: gary.algate@sandvik.com
    Just for interest sake the IVO In-Flight adjustable prop also gives you good control over EGT's. By coarsing up in cruise you can lower the EGT's significantly and also by going to a fine pitch in descent helps lower EGT's Gary Algate Classic4 Jab2200A This e-mail is confidential and it is intended only for the addressees. Any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail and delete the message from your system. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which may arise as a result of the e-mail transmission. "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net> Sent by: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com 20/11/2008 06:26 AM Please respond to kitfox-list@matronics.com To kitfox-list@matronics.com cc Subject Kitfox-List: Re: A Fun Flight > With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise > throttle. It drives them crazy! > Guy Buchanan Thanks for the reply Guy. I have the adjustable "Sparrow needles" and am still learning how to use them to keep the EGT's under control in a descent with partial power. It is easy...for me anyhow...to get confused and forget how many turns on the needle adjustments I have made then which way to turn the knobs to correct a rough engine when I get it out of wack. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215170#215170


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:01:59 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    From: "Paul A. Franz, P.E." <paul@eucleides.com>
    On Wed, November 19, 2008 8:12 am, Guy Buchanan wrote: > > At 06:34 PM 11/18/2008, you wrote: > With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise > throttle. It drives them crazy! A prop clutch has been mentioned a few times on the list here. Wouldn't that solve this problem and also make less engine shaking when you shut down too? With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so lubrication would still be maintained correctly. Just a thought. Id like to know. > > > Guy Buchanan > San Diego, CA > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. > > -- Paul A. Franz, P.E. PAF Consulting Engineers Office 425.440.9505 Cell 425.241.1618


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:15:15 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    From: "Paul A. Franz, P.E." <paul@eucleides.com>
    On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:16 am, darinh wrote: > Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out great. Wow! Super nice work! How many layers of cloth? What filler did you use? Epoxy? -- Paul A. Franz, P.E. PAF Consulting Engineers Office 425.440.9505 Cell 425.241.1618


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:06:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net>
    Paul, I use West Systems epoxy for all my layups and the cloth I used for this was 5 or 6 oz. I think. I cut it into 2"-3" strips and layed it up that way because the compound curves made it a bit difficult for a solid piece of cloth. For the filler, I used ultra lightweight body filler (lightweight bondo). You could also use Superfil but it takes much longer to cure and for simply filling in small amounts, bondo is great and cures in 5 minutes and is ready to sand. If you are more patient than I am, the correct way to fill the weave is to brush 3 or so coats of thinned epoxy resin over the finished product or make a female mold. I figured for these small parts, the time to make female molds then pull the parts would be much longer and much more work than simply filling, sanding, priming, sanding and topcoat. -------- Darin Hawkes Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) 914 Turbo Kaysville, Utah Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215194#215194


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:01 PM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    At 04:01 PM 11/19/2008, you wrote: >With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so >lubrication would still be >maintained correctly. The clutch is strictly centrifugal. Any time the engine's above 2700 rpm it's locked solid, regardless of whether the engine's doing the pushing or the prop. In order to get it to disengage in the air you have to slow to below about 50 mph, then it will disengage and you can descend with the engine at idle. I try not to do this because I worry about the instantaneous heating associated with re-engagement, when the engine rpm doesn't match the prop rpm very well. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:49 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Fun Flight
    From: "Paul A. Franz, P.E." <paul@eucleides.com>
    On Wed, November 19, 2008 5:48 pm, Guy Buchanan wrote: > > At 04:01 PM 11/19/2008, you wrote: >>With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so >>lubrication would still be >>maintained correctly. > > The clutch is strictly centrifugal. Any time the engine's > above 2700 rpm it's locked solid, regardless of whether the engine's > doing the pushing or the prop. In order to get it to disengage in the > air you have to slow to below about 50 mph, then it will disengage > and you can descend with the engine at idle. I try not to do this > because I worry about the instantaneous heating associated with > re-engagement, when the engine rpm doesn't match the prop rpm very well. I didn't know that. I thought it was a dog and pawl setup. Anyway, it sounds to me as long as the rpm difference is less than 2700 rpm then you'd be OK as apparently that's what it's designed for. So, as an example, assume you slowed the engine and prop to less than 2700 rpm so the clutch would disengage then let the engine go to idle, then the resume descent then the prop rpm might go over 2700 rpm but wouldn't go so fast that the tips went supersonic. You'd really hear that. You could calculate that rpm given the diameter and assume that the speed of sound is 1100 fps. Supersonic RPM = (1100 FPS * 60 Sec/Min) / (Dia [FT] * PI) then say you had a 68" dia prop, Supersonic RPM = (1100 * 60) / ((68/12) * 3.14159) = 3707 RPM So, it would seem to me that as soon as you hit the throttle, the engine would not engage the clutch until something just below 2700 rpm and the prop would not be going more than 1000 rpm or so faster than that. You'd know for sure it was supersonic by the really loud beating noise that happens when the prop tips go supersonic. You'd be safe since you know the rpm difference can be 2700 as that is what you have when you start the engine to begin with. Prop is going zero rpm and the engine gets close to 2700 rpm when the centrifugal clutch engages and that's apparently the design so I don't think you'd have to worry about re-engaging the clutch when the rpm difference is that low, albeit in this case the prop is going faster than the engine rather than the engine going faster than the prop as in the case of start up. (Whew, long sentence, should break it up) My point is, that if you release the clutch in flight then re-engage, the load on the clutch isn't going to be nearly as high as it is at start-up. It would bother me to have the prop disengaged from the engine in flight because then you're depending on the starter to work in case the engine dies and the windmilling prop would be no assistance what-so-ever. So, if you don't do your technique of descending in steps, what is the maximum descent rate you can have to stay within recommended EGT and Cyl Hd temperatures at some low power setting such as 25%? I could live with 1000 fpm descent fine and even 500 fpm would be workable given the relatively low ground speed. Some time back, actually many years ago, there was a debate about using pre-mix vs auto oil injection. I thought that the auto oil injection was rpm dependent vs air flow so that this effect would be automatically compensated for. Apparently not because the EGT still is rising too high and the only way to control that is by adding excess fuel. But maybe, when the engine isn't under load, the allowable EGT can be a little higher. You're probably saying "not with my pistons!" -- Paul A. Franz, P.E. PAF Consulting Engineers Office 425.440.9505 Cell 425.241.1618


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:49 PM PST US
    From: patrick reilly <patreilly43@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    Darin=2C How did you get cloth to stay up on underside of wing? Did you go beyond area needed and tape it up before applying resin? Pat Reilly Mod 3 582 Rebuild Rockford=2CIL> Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Windshield fit> From: gerns25@nets cape.net> Date: Wed=2C 19 Nov 2008 18:06:16 -0800> To: kitfox-list@matronic > > Paul=2C> > I use West Systems epoxy for all my layups and the cloth I u sed for this was 5 or 6 oz. I think. I cut it into 2"-3" strips and layed i t up that way because the compound curves made it a bit difficult for a sol id piece of cloth. For the filler=2C I used ultra lightweight body filler ( lightweight bondo). You could also use Superfil but it takes much longer to cure and for simply filling in small amounts=2C bondo is great and cures i n 5 minutes and is ready to sand. If you are more patient than I am=2C the correct way to fill the weave is to brush 3 or so coats of thinned epoxy re sin over the finished product or make a female mold. I figured for these sm all parts=2C the time to make female molds then pull the parts would be muc h longer and much more work than simply filling=2C sanding=2C priming=2C sa nding and topcoat.> > --------> Darin Hawkes> Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Te sting)> 914 Turbo> Kaysville=2C Utah> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215194#215194> > > > > > > ===============> > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:29:34 PM PST US
    From: patrick reilly <patreilly43@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Windshield fit
    Darin=2C I have fooled around with fiberglass building canoes and Corvette bodywork=2C you have done an outstanting job on those farings. You have to remove them to fold wing=2C correct? Pat Reilly From: MDKitfox@aol.comTo: kitfox-list@matronics.comSubject: Kitfox-List: Re : Windshield fitDate: Wed=2C 19 Nov 2008 14:20:33 -0500Darin=2C I looked at the photos and honestly=2C you did an outstanding job! The lis ters ought to take a look at these photos. I'm encouraged. If mine turn o ut half as good I'd be pleased. Thanks=2C Rick Weiss N39RW Series V Speedster=2C 912ULS SkyStar S/N 1 Port Orange=2C FL On Nov 19=2C 2008=2C at 1:16 PM=2C darinh wrote: re are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time=2C they will turn o ut great.--------Darin HawkesSeries 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)914 TurboKa ysville=2C UtahRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/view topic.php?p=215156#215156Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/ dscf2676_large_193.jpghttp://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100 .jpghttp://forumsp=3B (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)<brsp=3B ================== =====




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --