Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:21 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Catz631@aol.com)
     2. 05:35 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (LarryM)
     3. 05:45 AM - Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (LarryM)
     4. 08:23 AM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Guy Buchanan)
     5. 08:56 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Guy Buchanan)
     6. 08:56 AM - TruTrak ADI Autopilot II (kitfoxjim)
     7. 09:47 AM - Re: Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. (Guy Buchanan)
     8. 10:16 AM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
     9. 11:22 AM - Re: Windshield fit (Weiss Richard)
    10. 11:41 AM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
    11. 11:50 AM - Re: A Fun Flight (Tom Jones)
    12. 12:01 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (kerrjohna@comcast.net)
    13. 02:40 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (gary.algate@sandvik.com)
    14. 02:42 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (gary.algate@sandvik.com)
    15. 04:01 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    16. 04:15 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    17. 06:06 PM - Re: Windshield fit (darinh)
    18. 07:26 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Guy Buchanan)
    19. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: A Fun Flight (Paul A. Franz, P.E.)
    20. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (patrick reilly)
    21. 09:29 PM - Re: Re: Windshield fit (patrick reilly)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. | 
      
      Paul,
       That is all well and true that another engine can get you to the scene of 
      the crash if the first one fails but I am reminded of a few occasions when I was
      
      glad to have the others. One was over the pacific when we lost an engine in a 
      P-3. I knew 3 engines would take us home. Another was when I was a new 
      engineer for a major and flying a DC10 to London from Houston. We were far over
      the 
      Atlantic and heard a call from a B767 with a full load of passengers that was 
      diverting to Iceland because of an engine failure. His voice was rather high 
      pitched as you can imagine. (glad we had 3 and wish I could have given him one)
       The worst one was loosing two engines on a DC6 (1 and 3) prior to even 
      reaching 2000 ft! On that one I was riding in the back. After landing I 
      congratulated two very pale white pilots on a job well done. I was learning to
      fly this 
      aircraft and asked them if this was standard operation in this 
      aircraft.(loosing two)
       With all of that said, I too leave the throttle alone when I have to fly 
      over a large body of water with no other way of getting there. (glancing at a 
      good magazine article also helps)
      
                                                                Dick Maddux
                                                                Fox 4
                                                                Pensacola,Fl
      **************You Rock! One month of free movies delivered by mail from 
      blockbuster.com 
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. | 
      
      
      >From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul schedule that Rotax
      publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there after, crank replacement bases
      on 60% wear, no time/hr limit.  Details see 
      http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rotax-2-stroke-exemption-application.pdf
      
      larry
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215121#215121
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/sa_582_maintenance_schedule_687.pdf
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. | 
      
      
      Also from SA:  Rotax reliability facts:
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215122#215122
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/rotax_stats_159.jpg
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      
      At 06:34 PM 11/18/2008, you wrote:
      >You mention leaning as you climbed.  do you have the Arctic Sparrow 
      >cockpit adjustable needles?
      
               No, I have the HACman system that varies the float bowl 
      pressure to achieve moderate leaning. I like it a lot.
      
      >Also can you Tell more about the slam dunk method of descending to 
      >keep the EGT's in line?
      
               With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you 
      something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range 
      is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the 
      mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very 
      lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to 
      either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and 
      drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when 
      I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I 
      stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise 
      throttle. It drives them crazy!
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. | 
      
      
      At 05:34 AM 11/19/2008, you wrote:
      > >From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul 
      > schedule that Rotax publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there 
      > after, crank replacement bases on 60% wear, no time/hr limit.  Details see
      
               This is AMAZING, Larry. I checked their website 
      (http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/?p=469) and found that the request is 
      expected to be approved. I loved the letter because of the statistics 
      in the appendix. It's the best information on 582's I've ever seen.
      
      Thanks,
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | TruTrak ADI Autopilot II | 
      
      
      Read post about ADI autopilot, but does anyone have any drawings or pics on how
      to hook up the servos to the flight controls in a Vixen?
      
      What brakets, etc needs to be made? I think I have everything figured out except
      controll/servo hookup.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215141#215141
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Engine - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke. | 
      
      At 05:34 AM 11/19/2008, you wrote:
      > From South Africa where they changed the mandatory overhaul 
      > schedule that Rotax publishes to 600hrs/10yrs, then 300 hrs there 
      > after, crank replacement bases on 60% wear, no time/hr limit.  Details see
      >
      >http://misasa.flyeaaforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rotax-2-stroke-exemption-application.pdf
      
      Larry,
               I have attached a plot of the number of engines in each 
      group of 100 hours, (i.e. 0-100, 100-200, etc.) These are the hours 
      582s in South Africa have flown without crank replacement or major 
      overhaul. I'm trying to figure out the number of hours one can fly 
      with a 97% chance of no-crank-failure based on this data, but my 
      statistical mathematics is rusty.
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      Rick,
      
      Here are some pics of my fairings.  If you take your time, they will turn out great.
      
      --------
      Darin Hawkes
      Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)
      914 Turbo
      Kaysville, Utah
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      Darin,
      
      I looked at the photos and honestly, you did an outstanding job!  The  
      listers ought to take a look at these photos.  I'm encouraged.  If  
      mine turn out half as good I'd be pleased.
      
      Thanks,
      
      Rick Weiss
      N39RW Series V Speedster, 912ULS
      SkyStar S/N 1
      Port Orange, FL
      
      
      On Nov 19, 2008, at 1:16 PM, darinh wrote:
      
      >
      > Rick,
      >
      > Here are some pics of my fairings.  If you take your time, they will  
      > turn out great.
      >
      > --------
      > Darin Hawkes
      > Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)
      > 914 Turbo
      > Kaysville, Utah
      >
      >
      > Read this topic online here:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156
      >
      >
      > Attachments:
      >
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg
      >
      >
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      Rick,
      
      Thanks for the compliments...I am pretty please with how the turned out.  I had
      put this part off for a couple months and went the tape route but with the temps
      dropping (and an incident where a peice of tape came loose and gave me quite
      a scare) I decided that now was as good as any to make the fairings.  Fiberglass
      is a great medium to work with...just make sure you protect the area you
      are working and make sure you have a good release agent (brown packaging tape
      in this instance).  Clean up any epoxy drips before it cures also.  Have fun.
      
      --------
      Darin Hawkes
      Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)
      914 Turbo
      Kaysville, Utah
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215168#215168
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      
      
      > With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you 
      > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range 
      > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the 
      > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very 
      > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to 
      > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and 
      > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when 
      > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I 
      > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise 
      > throttle. It drives them crazy! 
      > Guy Buchanan 
      
      
      Thanks for the reply Guy.  I have the adjustable "Sparrow needles" and am still
      learning how to use them to keep the EGT's under control in a descent with partial
      power.
      
      It is easy...for me anyhow...to get confused and forget how many turns on the needle
      adjustments I have made then which way to turn the knobs to correct a rough
      engine when I get it out of wack.
      
      --------
      Tom Jones
      Classic IV
      503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
      Ellensburg, WA
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215170#215170
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      Darin, good looking fairings
      
      John Kerr
      
      -------------- Original message -------------- 
      From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> 
      
      > 
      > Rick, 
      > 
      > Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out
      
      > great. 
      > 
      > -------- 
      > Darin Hawkes 
      > Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) 
      > 914 Turbo 
      > Kaysville, Utah 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Read this topic online here: 
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Attachments: 
      > 
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg 
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg 
      > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      <html><body>
      <DIV>Darin, good looking fairings</DIV>
      <DIV> </DIV>
      <DIV>John Kerr</DIV>
      <DIV> </DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">-------------- Original message -------------- <BR>From: "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net> <BR><BR>> --> Kitfox-List message posted by: "darinh" <GERNS25@NETSCAPE.NET><BR>> <BR>> Rick, <BR>> <BR>> Here are some pics of my fairings. If you take your time, they will turn out <BR>> great. <BR>> <BR>> -------- <BR>> Darin Hawkes <BR>> Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing) <BR>> 914 Turbo <BR>> Kaysville, Utah <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Read this topic online here: <BR>> <BR>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156 <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Attachments: <BR>> <BR>> http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg <BR>> http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg <BR>> http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
       ; <BR>
        more:
      
      <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
      
      </b></font></pre></body></html>
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      Dean
      
      you did a really nice job of those fairings
      
      Gary Algate
      Classic 4 jab 2200
      
      
      This e-mail is confidential and it is intended only for the addressees. 
      Any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message by 
      persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If 
      you have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify us immediately by 
      telephone or e-mail and delete the message from your system. The sender 
      does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of 
      this message which may arise as a result of the e-mail transmission.
      
      
      "darinh" <gerns25@netscape.net>
      Sent by: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      20/11/2008 04:53 AM
      Please respond to
      kitfox-list@matronics.com
      
      To
      kitfox-list@matronics.com
      cc
      
      Subject
      Kitfox-List: Re: Windshield fit
      
      
      
      Rick,
      
      Here are some pics of my fairings.  If you take your time, they will turn 
      out great.
      
      --------
      Darin Hawkes
      Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)
      914 Turbo
      Kaysville, Utah
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215156#215156
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2676_large_193.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100.jpg
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2674_large_466.jpg
      
      
Message 14
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      Just for interest sake the IVO In-Flight adjustable prop also gives you 
      good control over EGT's.
      
      By coarsing up in cruise you can lower the EGT's significantly and also by 
      going to a fine pitch in descent helps lower EGT's
      
      
      Gary Algate
      Classic4 Jab2200A
      
      
      This e-mail is confidential and it is intended only for the addressees. 
      Any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message by 
      persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If 
      you have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify us immediately by 
      telephone or e-mail and delete the message from your system. The sender 
      does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of 
      this message which may arise as a result of the e-mail transmission.
      
      
      "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
      Sent by: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      20/11/2008 06:26 AM
      Please respond to
      kitfox-list@matronics.com
      
      To
      kitfox-list@matronics.com
      cc
      
      Subject
      Kitfox-List: Re: A Fun Flight
      
      
      
      
      > With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you 
      > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range 
      > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the 
      > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very 
      > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to 
      > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and 
      > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when 
      > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I 
      > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise 
      > throttle. It drives them crazy! 
      > Guy Buchanan 
      
      
      Thanks for the reply Guy.  I have the adjustable "Sparrow needles" and am 
      still learning how to use them to keep the EGT's under control in a 
      descent with partial power.
      
      It is easy...for me anyhow...to get confused and forget how many turns on 
      the needle adjustments I have made then which way to turn the knobs to 
      correct a rough engine when I get it out of wack.
      
      --------
      Tom Jones
      Classic IV
      503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
      Ellensburg, WA
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215170#215170
      
      
Message 15
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      
      
      On Wed, November 19, 2008 8:12 am, Guy Buchanan wrote:
      >
      > At 06:34 PM 11/18/2008, you wrote:
      
      >          With the HACman system you install rich mains, to give you
      > something to lean off. I run 180's here in San Diego. The mid range
      > is kept as-is so when you go moderately down hill you end up in the
      > mid-range jets with the prop pushing the engine and therefore very
      > lean. The only way to go down hill without getting too lean is to
      > either go slow, or descend slowly, or pull the throttle way back and
      > drop like a rock. Usually I do shallow controlled descents, but when
      > I'm trying to stay with my 912 buddies, or the view is pretty, I
      > stair-step down, dropping fast near idle, the levelling at cruise
      > throttle. It drives them crazy!
      
      A prop clutch has been mentioned a few times on the list here. Wouldn't that solve
      this problem and also make less engine shaking when you shut down too?
      
      With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so lubrication would still
      be
      maintained correctly.
      
      Just a thought. Id like to know.
      
      >
      >
      > Guy Buchanan
      > San Diego, CA
      > K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.
      >
      >
      
      
      -- 
      Paul A. Franz, P.E.
      PAF Consulting Engineers
      Office 425.440.9505
      Cell 425.241.1618
      
      
Message 16
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      
      On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:16 am, darinh wrote:
      
      > Here are some pics of my fairings.  If you take your time, they will turn out
      great.
      
      Wow! Super nice work!
      
      How many layers of cloth? What filler did you use? Epoxy?
      
      -- 
      Paul A. Franz, P.E.
      PAF Consulting Engineers
      Office 425.440.9505
      Cell 425.241.1618
      
      
Message 17
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      Paul,
      
      I use West Systems epoxy for all my layups and the cloth I used for this was 5
      or 6 oz. I think.  I cut it into 2"-3" strips and layed it up that way because
      the compound curves made it a bit difficult for a solid piece of cloth.  For
      the filler, I used ultra lightweight body filler (lightweight bondo).  You could
      also use Superfil but it takes much longer to cure and for simply filling in
      small amounts, bondo is great and cures in 5 minutes and is ready to sand. 
      If you are more patient than I am, the correct way to fill the weave is to brush
      3 or so coats of thinned epoxy resin over the finished product or make a female
      mold.  I figured for these small parts, the time to make female molds then
      pull the parts would be much longer and much more work than simply filling,
      sanding, priming, sanding and topcoat.
      
      --------
      Darin Hawkes
      Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)
      914 Turbo
      Kaysville, Utah
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215194#215194
      
      
Message 18
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      
      At 04:01 PM 11/19/2008, you wrote:
      >With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so 
      >lubrication would still be
      >maintained correctly.
      
               The clutch is strictly centrifugal. Any time the engine's 
      above 2700 rpm it's locked solid, regardless of whether the engine's 
      doing the pushing or the prop. In order to get it to disengage in the 
      air you have to slow to below about 50 mph, then it will disengage 
      and you can descend with the engine at idle. I try not to do this 
      because I worry about the instantaneous heating associated with 
      re-engagement, when the engine rpm doesn't match the prop rpm very well.
      
      
      Guy Buchanan
      San Diego, CA
      K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar. 
      
      
Message 19
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: A Fun Flight | 
      
      
      
      On Wed, November 19, 2008 5:48 pm, Guy Buchanan wrote:
      >
      > At 04:01 PM 11/19/2008, you wrote:
      >>With a clutch on the prop it wouldn't drive the engine so
      >>lubrication would still be
      >>maintained correctly.
      >
      >          The clutch is strictly centrifugal. Any time the engine's
      > above 2700 rpm it's locked solid, regardless of whether the engine's
      > doing the pushing or the prop. In order to get it to disengage in the
      > air you have to slow to below about 50 mph, then it will disengage
      > and you can descend with the engine at idle. I try not to do this
      > because I worry about the instantaneous heating associated with
      > re-engagement, when the engine rpm doesn't match the prop rpm very well.
      
      I didn't know that. I thought it was a dog and pawl setup. Anyway, it sounds to
      me as
      long as the rpm difference is less than 2700 rpm then you'd be OK as apparently
      that's
      what it's designed for. So, as an example, assume you slowed the engine and prop
      to
      less than 2700 rpm so the clutch would disengage then let the engine go to idle,
      then
      the resume descent then the prop rpm might go over 2700 rpm but wouldn't go so
      fast
      that the tips went supersonic. You'd really hear that. You could calculate that
      rpm
      given the diameter and assume that the speed of sound is 1100 fps.
      
      Supersonic RPM = (1100 FPS * 60 Sec/Min) / (Dia [FT] * PI)
      
      then say you had a 68" dia prop,
      
      Supersonic RPM = (1100 * 60) / ((68/12) * 3.14159)
      
                     = 3707 RPM
      
      So, it would seem to me that as soon as you hit the throttle, the engine would
      not
      engage the clutch until something just below 2700 rpm and the prop would not be
      going
      more than 1000 rpm or so faster than that. You'd know for sure it was supersonic
      by
      the really loud beating noise that happens when the prop tips go supersonic. You'd
      be
      safe since you know the rpm difference can be 2700 as that is what you have when
      you
      start the engine to begin with. Prop is going zero rpm and the engine gets close
      to
      2700 rpm when the centrifugal clutch engages and that's apparently the design so
      I
      don't think you'd have to worry about re-engaging the clutch when the rpm difference
      is that low, albeit in this case the prop is going faster than the engine rather
      than
      the engine going faster than the prop as in the case of start up. (Whew, long
      sentence, should break it up)
      
      My point is, that if you release the clutch in flight then re-engage, the load
      on the
      clutch isn't going to be nearly as high as it is at start-up.
      
      It would bother me to have the prop disengaged from the engine in flight because
      then
      you're depending on the starter to work in case the engine dies and the windmilling
      prop would be no assistance what-so-ever.
      
      So, if you don't do your technique of descending in steps, what is the maximum
      descent
      rate you can have to stay within recommended EGT and Cyl Hd temperatures at some
      low
      power setting such as 25%? I could live with 1000 fpm descent fine and even 500
      fpm
      would be workable given the relatively low ground speed.
      
      Some time back, actually many years ago, there was a debate about using pre-mix
      vs
      auto oil injection. I thought that the auto oil injection was rpm dependent vs
      air
      flow so that this effect would be automatically compensated for. Apparently not
      because the EGT still is rising too high and the only way to control that is by
      adding
      excess fuel. But maybe, when the engine isn't under load, the allowable EGT can
      be a
      little higher. You're probably saying "not with my pistons!"
      
      
      -- 
      Paul A. Franz, P.E.
      PAF Consulting Engineers
      Office 425.440.9505
      Cell 425.241.1618
      
      
Message 20
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      Darin=2C How did you get cloth to stay up on underside of wing? Did you go 
      beyond area needed and tape it up before applying resin?
      
      Pat Reilly
      Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      Rockford=2CIL> Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Windshield fit> From: gerns25@nets
      cape.net> Date: Wed=2C 19 Nov 2008 18:06:16 -0800> To: kitfox-list@matronic
      > > Paul=2C> > I use West Systems epoxy for all my layups and the cloth I u
      sed for this was 5 or 6 oz. I think. I cut it into 2"-3" strips and layed i
      t up that way because the compound curves made it a bit difficult for a sol
      id piece of cloth. For the filler=2C I used ultra lightweight body filler (
      lightweight bondo). You could also use Superfil but it takes much longer to
       cure and for simply filling in small amounts=2C bondo is great and cures i
      n 5 minutes and is ready to sand. If you are more patient than I am=2C the 
      correct way to fill the weave is to brush 3 or so coats of thinned epoxy re
      sin over the finished product or make a female mold. I figured for these sm
      all parts=2C the time to make female molds then pull the parts would be muc
      h longer and much more work than simply filling=2C sanding=2C priming=2C sa
      nding and topcoat.> > --------> Darin Hawkes> Series 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Te
      sting)> 914 Turbo> Kaysville=2C Utah> > > > > Read this topic online here:>
       > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=215194#215194> > > > > > >
      ===============> > > 
      
Message 21
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Windshield fit | 
      
      
      Darin=2C I have fooled around with fiberglass building canoes and Corvette 
      bodywork=2C you have done an outstanting job on those farings. You have to 
      remove them to fold wing=2C correct?
      
      Pat Reilly
      
      
      From: MDKitfox@aol.comTo: kitfox-list@matronics.comSubject: Kitfox-List: Re
      : Windshield fitDate: Wed=2C 19 Nov 2008 14:20:33 -0500Darin=2C
      
      I looked at the photos and honestly=2C you did an outstanding job!  The lis
      ters ought to take a look at these photos.  I'm encouraged.  If mine turn o
      ut half as good I'd be pleased.
      
      Thanks=2C
      
      
      Rick Weiss
      N39RW Series V Speedster=2C 912ULS
      SkyStar S/N 1
      Port Orange=2C FL
      
      On Nov 19=2C 2008=2C at 1:16 PM=2C darinh wrote:
      
      re are some pics of my fairings.  If you take your time=2C they will turn o
      ut great.--------Darin HawkesSeries 7 (Phase 1 - Flight Testing)914 TurboKa
      ysville=2C UtahRead this topic online here:http://forums.matronics.com/view
      topic.php?p=215156#215156Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/
      dscf2676_large_193.jpghttp://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf2675_large_100
      .jpghttp://forumsp=3B      (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!)<brsp=3B      
                         ==================
      ===== 
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |