Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:10 PM - Ethanol problem solver (Jim Feldmann)
2. 02:42 PM - Ski Size (Pat Reilly)
3. 03:39 PM - Re: Ethanol problem solver (vetdrem)
4. 05:21 PM - Re: Ski Size (Lynn Matteson)
5. 06:39 PM - Re: Ski Size (R.D.(Ron) Leclerc)
6. 06:54 PM - Re: Ski Size (Trey Moran)
7. 07:04 PM - Re: Ski Size (patrick reilly)
8. 07:24 PM - Re: Ski Size (R.D.(Ron) Leclerc)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Ethanol problem solver |
Here in CALIF. the law requires that all gas have ethanol. The boating group suffers
from many of the same problems that we do from ethanol and they seem to
like this additive. (VALVTECT)
http://www.valvtect.com/ethanol.asp
What are your thoughts? Are there any other additives that can be used to protect
the fuel system from the ethanol in autogas?
--------
Jim Feldmann, 3rd owner
1994 Kitfox IV Speedster / 912
Down for engine work
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=232808#232808
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What length and
sq ' or " footprint do I need?
Pat Reilly
Mod 3 582 Rebuild
Rockford,IL
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Ethanol problem solver |
My concerns about ethanol are with the deterioration of my fiberglass tanks, not
the engine. Rotax says that "some" ethanol is OK. But the resin used in the
tanks can't handle it. The product that you are talking about may well help
engines that will not do well with ethanol, but it wont help my tanks.
louie
model 3 912ul
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=232830#232830
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Pat-
Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned out
to be 768 sq in for the pair, and another pair for a
Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine are a
bit oversize, but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow skis seem
to work better in hard snow, and wider are better for lighter snow,
it seems.
Lynn Matteson
Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
Jabiru 2200, #2062, 605 hrs
Sensenich 62x46
Electroair direct-fire ignition system
Status: flying
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Pat Reilly wrote:
> Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What
> length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
>
> Pat Reilly
> Mod 3 582 Rebuild
> Rockford,IL
> ============================================================ _-
> ============================================================ _-
> contribution_-
> ===========================================================
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built skis
on Yahoo, and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to say:
"hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
5200 in flight, the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
listed at zenith."
"just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
hardware and clips. rest of the cable, bungii and hardware is local
building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
Let me know if you can access this link, there are some pics there of the
skis...
R.D.(Ron) Leclerc
CH701 Plans(Scrap) Builder #7-6699
Porsche Power Geared Redrive
Winnipeg, MB Canada
infow@mts.net
3/2/2009 7:56:49 PM
:-(
:-(
:-( Hi Pat-
:-( Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned
:-( out to be 768 sq in for the pair, and another pair for a
:-( Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine
:-( are a bit oversize, but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow
:-( skis seem to work better in hard snow, and wider are better for
:-( lighter snow, it seems.
:-(
:-( Lynn Matteson
:-( Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
:-( Jabiru 2200, #2062, 605 hrs
:-( Sensenich 62x46
:-( Electroair direct-fire ignition system
:-( Status: flying
:-(
:-(
:-( On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Pat Reilly wrote:
:-(
:-(:-( Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What
:-(:-( length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
:-(:-(
:-(:-( Pat Reilly
:-(:-( Mod 3 582 Rebuild
:-(:-( Rockford,IL
:-(:-( ===========================================================
:-(:-( _-
:-(:-( ===========================================================
:-(:-( _- contribution_-
:-(:-( ===========================================================
:-(:-(
:-(
:-( = - The Kitfox-List Email Forum -
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
:-( = - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
:-( your generous support!
:-( ->
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Ron,
How 'bout posting your pictures to the matronics/kitfox list
Trey Moran
----- Original Message -----
From: "R.D.(Ron) Leclerc" <infow@mts.net>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Ski Size
>
> Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built skis
> on Yahoo, and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to say:
>
> "hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
> perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
> of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
> plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
> cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
> like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
> mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
> noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
> 5200 in flight, the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
> little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
> total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
> carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
> the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
> will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
> listed at zenith."
>
> "just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
> 3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
> wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
> hardware and clips. rest of the cable, bungii and hardware is local
> building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
> size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
> case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
> wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Ron=2C I couldn't open the photos.
do not archive
Pat Reilly
Mod 3 582 Rebuild
Rockford=2C IL
> From: infow@mts.net
> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
> Date: Mon=2C 2 Mar 2009 20:38:26 -0600
> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Ski Size
>
>
> Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built ski
s
> on Yahoo=2C and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to s
ay:
>
> "hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
> perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
> of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
> plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
> cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
> like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
> mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
> noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
> 5200 in flight=2C the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
> little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
> total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
> carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
> the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
> will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
> listed at zenith."
>
> "just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
> 3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
> wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
> hardware and clips. rest of the cable=2C bungii and hardware is local
> building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
> size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
> case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
> wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
>
>
>
> Let me know if you can access this link=2C there are some pics there of t
he
> skis...
> R.D.(Ron) Leclerc
> CH701 Plans(Scrap) Builder #7-6699
> Porsche Power Geared Redrive
> Winnipeg=2C MB Canada
> infow@mts.net
> 3/2/2009 7:56:49 PM
>
>
>
>
> :-(
> :-(
> :-( Hi Pat-
> :-( Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned
> :-( out to be 768 sq in for the pair=2C and another pair for a
> :-( Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine
> :-( are a bit oversize=2C but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow
> :-( skis seem to work better in hard snow=2C and wider are better for
> :-( lighter snow=2C it seems.
> :-(
> :-( Lynn Matteson
> :-( Kitfox IV Speedster=2C taildragger
> :-( Jabiru 2200=2C #2062=2C 605 hrs
> :-( Sensenich 62x46
> :-( Electroair direct-fire ignition system
> :-( Status: flying
> :-(
> :-(
> :-( On Mar 2=2C 2009=2C at 5:41 PM=2C Pat Reilly wrote:
> :-(
> :-(:-( Lynn Matteson=2C Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What
> :-(:-( length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
> :-(:-(
> :-(:-( Pat Reilly
> :-(:-( Mod 3 582 Rebuild
> :-(:-( Rockford=2CIL
> :-(:-( ======================
============
> :-(:-( _-
> :-(:-( ======================
============
> :-(:-( _- contribution_-
> :-(:-( ======================
============
> :-(:-(
> :-(
> :-( = - The Kitfox-List Email Forum -
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
> :-( = - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
> :-( your generous support!
> :-( ->
> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found ---
A message with no text/plain MIME section was received.
The entire body of the message was removed. Please
resend the email using Plain Text formatting.
HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section
in their client's default configuration. If you're using
HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings
and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text".
--- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|