Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:10 PM - Ethanol problem solver (Jim Feldmann)
     2. 02:42 PM - Ski Size (Pat Reilly)
     3. 03:39 PM - Re: Ethanol problem solver (vetdrem)
     4. 05:21 PM - Re: Ski Size (Lynn Matteson)
     5. 06:39 PM - Re: Ski Size (R.D.(Ron) Leclerc)
     6. 06:54 PM - Re: Ski Size (Trey Moran)
     7. 07:04 PM - Re: Ski Size (patrick reilly)
     8. 07:24 PM - Re: Ski Size (R.D.(Ron) Leclerc)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Ethanol problem solver | 
      
      
      Here in CALIF. the law requires that all gas have ethanol.  The boating group suffers
      from many of the same problems that we do from ethanol and they seem to
      like this additive.  (VALVTECT)
      
      http://www.valvtect.com/ethanol.asp
      
      What are your thoughts?  Are there any other additives that can be used to protect
      the fuel system from the ethanol in autogas?
      
      --------
      Jim Feldmann, 3rd owner
      1994 Kitfox IV Speedster / 912
      Down for engine work
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=232808#232808
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What length and 
      sq ' or " footprint do I need? 
      
      Pat Reilly 
      Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      Rockford,IL
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Ethanol problem solver | 
      
      
      My concerns about ethanol are with the deterioration of my fiberglass tanks, not
      the engine.  Rotax says that "some" ethanol is OK.  But the resin used in the
      tanks can't handle it.  The product that you are talking about may well help
      engines that will not do well with ethanol, but it wont help my tanks.
      
      louie
      model 3   912ul
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=232830#232830
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Hi Pat-
      Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned out  
      to be 768 sq in for the pair, and another pair for a  
      Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine are a  
      bit oversize, but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow skis seem  
      to work better in hard snow, and wider are better for lighter snow,  
      it seems.
      
      Lynn Matteson
      Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      Jabiru 2200, #2062, 605 hrs
      Sensenich 62x46
      Electroair direct-fire ignition system
      Status: flying
      
      
      On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Pat Reilly wrote:
      
      > Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What  
      > length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
      >
      > Pat Reilly
      > Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      > Rockford,IL
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > ============================================================ _- 
      > contribution_- 
      > ===========================================================
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built skis 
      on Yahoo, and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to say:
      
      "hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
      perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
      of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
      plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
      cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
      like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
      mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
      noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
      5200 in flight, the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
      little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
      total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
      carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
      the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
      will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
      listed at zenith."
      
      "just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
      3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
      wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
      hardware and clips. rest of the cable, bungii and hardware is local
      building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
      size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
      case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
      wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
      
      
      Let me know if you can access this link, there are some pics there of the 
      skis...
      R.D.(Ron) Leclerc
      CH701 Plans(Scrap)  Builder #7-6699
      Porsche Power  Geared  Redrive
      Winnipeg,  MB Canada
      infow@mts.net
      3/2/2009 7:56:49 PM
      
      
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( Hi Pat-
      :-( Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned
      :-( out to be 768 sq in for the pair, and another pair for a
      :-( Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine
      :-( are a bit oversize, but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow
      :-( skis seem to work better in hard snow, and wider are better for
      :-( lighter snow, it seems.
      :-(
      :-( Lynn Matteson
      :-( Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
      :-( Jabiru 2200, #2062, 605 hrs
      :-( Sensenich 62x46
      :-( Electroair direct-fire ignition system
      :-( Status: flying
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Pat Reilly wrote:
      :-(
      :-(:-( Lynn Matteson, Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What
      :-(:-( length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
      :-(:-(
      :-(:-( Pat Reilly
      :-(:-( Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      :-(:-( Rockford,IL
      :-(:-( ===========================================================
      :-(:-( _-
      :-(:-( ===========================================================
      :-(:-( _- contribution_-
      :-(:-( ===========================================================
      :-(:-(
      :-(
      :-( =          - The Kitfox-List Email Forum -
      http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
      :-( =               - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      :-( your generous support!
      :-( -> 
      http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Ron,
      
      How 'bout posting your pictures to the matronics/kitfox list
      
      Trey Moran
      
      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "R.D.(Ron) Leclerc" <infow@mts.net>
      Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:38 PM
      Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Ski Size
      
      
      >
      > Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built skis
      > on Yahoo, and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to say:
      >
      > "hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
      > perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
      > of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
      > plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
      > cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
      > like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
      > mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
      > noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
      > 5200 in flight, the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
      > little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
      > total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
      > carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
      > the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
      > will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
      > listed at zenith."
      >
      > "just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
      > 3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
      > wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
      > hardware and clips. rest of the cable, bungii and hardware is local
      > building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
      > size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
      > case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
      > wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
      >
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Ron=2C I couldn't open the photos.
      
      do not archive
      
      Pat Reilly
      Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      Rockford=2C IL
      
      
      > From: infow@mts.net
      > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com
      > Date: Mon=2C 2 Mar 2009 20:38:26 -0600
      > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Ski Size
      > 
      > 
      > Hey Lynn and Pat this link is from a 701 builder with some home built ski
      s 
      > on Yahoo=2C and here are a couple of messages... this is what he had to s
      ay:
      > 
      > "hi all took some time but the new skis are installed and tested
      > perfectly this past weekend. performed very well on the snow which b/c
      > of the recent thaw surface was very dense and hard. i can pull the
      > plane with one finger on prop on top of this stuff. because of the
      > cant in the main gear the outer edge of the ski is lower then i would
      > like but still performed very well on the grass.all skis are 15" wide
      > mains are 48" long and nw is 36" top speed was down about 5mph and is
      > noticable less responsive to full throttle up. A mushy 4ooo rpm to
      > 5200 in flight=2C the engine responds like normal but the asi is a
      > little slower to catch up. climbout was still impressive as ever.
      > total weight of all hardware is 60 lbs. so not so good for passenger
      > carrying but at least spent 2hours sipping around doing t & g's with
      > the bunch of hanger buddies only able to watch from the snowbanks.
      > will post some pics soon but will look like carbon copies of the ones
      > listed at zenith."
      > 
      > "just uploaded some photos. mains are 14 x 48 x 1/8 alum sheet with a
      > 3.5" incline. 2- 1 x 2" rails on 12" centers stitch welded with a 15 "
      > wide sheet of 1/8 uhmw popriveted to bottoms. an bolts for mounting
      > hardware and clips. rest of the cable=2C bungii and hardware is local
      > building material. the nw pivot is a shouldered bushing machined to
      > size witha 5/16 x 2 an bolt and locknut. the "s" brace is a just in
      > case support. I can remove the ski without touching the nw axle. tail
      > wheels are hockey pucks board and oilite bushings pressed into."
      > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/701builders/photos/album/995817052/pic/list
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Let me know if you can access this link=2C there are some pics there of t
      he 
      > skis...
      > R.D.(Ron) Leclerc
      > CH701 Plans(Scrap) Builder #7-6699
      > Porsche Power Geared Redrive
      > Winnipeg=2C MB Canada
      > infow@mts.net
      > 3/2/2009 7:56:49 PM
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > :-(
      > :-(
      > :-( Hi Pat-
      > :-( Mine are about 600 sq inches each. I measured a Cub that turned
      > :-( out to be 768 sq in for the pair=2C and another pair for a
      > :-( Cub...Federals...that measured 1008 sq in for the pair. So mine
      > :-( are a bit oversize=2C but work very well in 12-14" of snow. Narrow
      > :-( skis seem to work better in hard snow=2C and wider are better for
      > :-( lighter snow=2C it seems.
      > :-(
      > :-( Lynn Matteson
      > :-( Kitfox IV Speedster=2C taildragger
      > :-( Jabiru 2200=2C #2062=2C 605 hrs
      > :-( Sensenich 62x46
      > :-( Electroair direct-fire ignition system
      > :-( Status: flying
      > :-(
      > :-(
      > :-( On Mar 2=2C 2009=2C at 5:41 PM=2C Pat Reilly wrote:
      > :-(
      > :-(:-( Lynn Matteson=2C Looking at snowboards to convert to skis. What
      > :-(:-( length and sq ' or " footprint do I need?
      > :-(:-(
      > :-(:-( Pat Reilly
      > :-(:-( Mod 3 582 Rebuild
      > :-(:-( Rockford=2CIL
      > :-(:-( ======================
      ============
      > :-(:-( _-
      > :-(:-( ======================
      ============
      > :-(:-( _- contribution_-
      > :-(:-( ======================
      ============
      > :-(:-(
      > :-(
      > :-( = - The Kitfox-List Email Forum -
      > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
      > :-( = - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      > :-( your generous support!
      > :-( -> 
      > http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      > 
      > 
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      ===========
      > 
      > 
      > 
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      --- MIME Errors - No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
        A message with no text/plain MIME section was received.
        The entire body of the message was removed.  Please
        resend the email using Plain Text formatting.
      
        HOTMAIL is notorious for only including an HTML section
        in their client's default configuration.  If you're using
        HOTMAIL, please see your email application's settings
        and switch to a default mail option that uses "Plain Text".
      
      --- MIME Errors No Plain-Text Section Found ---
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |