Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:13 AM - Re: Lift Reserve (dave)
     2. 03:14 AM - Re: Angle of Attack instrument (dave)
     3. 03:23 AM - Re: GSC props (dave)
     4. 03:30 AM - Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 (dave)
     5. 03:35 AM - Kitfox IV for sale 912 Very good pricing 22,800 (dave)
     6. 03:36 AM - Re: Charging system trouble shooting (dave)
     7. 03:40 AM - Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 (dave)
     8. 05:52 AM - Re: Kitfox Control Surface Flutter MitigationKitfox Control Surface (Catz631@aol.com)
     9. 06:56 AM - Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 (JetPilot)
    10. 09:23 AM - Re: Lift Reserve (R.D.(Ron) Leclerc)
    11. 09:49 AM - Re: Re: Charging system trouble shooting (Dave G)
    12. 01:06 PM - Re: Re: Charging system trouble shooting (Noel Loveys)
    13. 04:34 PM - Re: Re: GSC props (Noel Loveys)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Lift Reserve | 
      
      
      Lift reserve   AOA -- Best price I seen 
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=73
      
      125$ US
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241181#241181
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Angle of Attack instrument | 
      
      
      Here is another one    http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=73
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241182#241182
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Now that GSC are once again a good prop  here is one that I had to fix the broken
      engine mount on a couple of years ago .  This one was always kept indoors,
      never over tightened. Wood did not seem rotted and blades were not loose.  
      http://www.cfisher.com/gsc/
      Owner was in Mid 80s at  the time and noticed on run up something was not right
      and taxied back to his hangar and a few feet from the door it shed one blade.
      Usually when a prop departs on a Rotax the carbs jump out of the rubber boots
      and engine shuts down. 
      
      
      JetPilot wrote:
      > Lowell,
      > 
      > You observation of the numbers of GSC props sold and reported problems does make
      a very good point.  I have to agree with you, given the numbers of props sold,
      GSC props are not dangerous if installed properly.  I would not take that
      to mean they are the best prop available now, a lot of advancements have been
      made in sport propellers since the 1980's when kitfoxes started using GSC props.
      > 
      > This thread has been one of the better ones this forum has seen in a while. 
      A reminder of important maintenance procedures is a a good thing.   I think the
      many people here flying with GSC props will be extra vigilant in making sure
      their props are properly cared for and properly torqued.  This is even better
      information for those buying a used Kitfox with a GSC prop already on it, they
      will most likely do a better inspection and re torquing of the prop given the
      information here.
      > 
      > Mike
      
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241183#241183
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH | 
      701
      
      
      701 is a high drag airplane. The glide ratio is far less that a Kitfox.
      
      
      Here is some Deadsticking in a Kitfox  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm1iqcn8nFM
      
      
      motoadve wrote:
      > Thanks a lot for the replies.
      > 
      > Wouldnt the CH 701 be safer at a stall speed of 30mph instead of 37of the kitfox
      4 or 41 in the Super sport?
      > 
      > According to this numbers the Kitfox will stop flying before the CH 701 in case
      of an emergency.
      > 
      > Im not expert at all so flame away.
      
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241184#241184
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Kitfox IV for sale 912 Very good pricing 22,800 | 
      
      
      Look on Barnstormers for pics 
      
      I know nothing about this plane other that is a excellent priced Kitfox.
      BRS , Radiso, GPS, transponder worth 5k alone. so you get a 912 less that a new
      one with a prop and 200 hours.   PLane is free  -- 
      
      cheap .
      
      KITFOX IV #1200  $22,800  FLY RIGHT NOW  Kitfox Model IV Registration - N96MJ Built
      1996 Total Time AF and Engine 200 Hours Engine  Rotax 912UL  80 HP New Factory
      Supplied Reinforced Motor Mount Oil Cooler 2 - 13 Gallon Fuel Tanks (26
      Gallons Total) Propeller  IVO 3 bladed in flight adjustable Dual Controls Grove
      Landing Gear Whelen Strobes BRS Ballistic Chute (Needs to be repacked due to
      recommended time between packs) Dual in cabin heater installed Electronics: Bendix
      King KLX135A GPS/Radio with moving map display Bendix King KT76A Transponder
      Sigtronics SPA-400 stereo intercom with music switcher All Logs  Contact
      John H. Smith, Owner - located Broadalbin, NY USA  Telephone: 518-883-4337  Posted
      April 16, 2009
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241185#241185
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Charging system trouble shooting | 
      
      
      Did you check the voltage yet ? 
      
      
      dave wrote:
      > James, Have you checked your battery ? 
      > - Fluid level -- top with distilled water and slow charge over night 
      > - once charge put on a load test. 
      > 
      > I assume that after you put on the key west regulator that you ran a voltage
      check ? You should be getting about 14 V  with engine running and 12.5 to 13.2
      with engine off 
      > 
      > 
      > 
      > Dave
      
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241186#241186
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH | 
      701
      
      
      I have a friend with a 701  912 ul . 
      I have a kitfox 582 that is faster  cruise and take offs not much different.  
      His angle of climb a bit steeper.  
      He wants to travel further and faster and just finished a Sonex with jab 3300.
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241187#241187
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Kitfox Control Surface Flutter MitigationKitfox Control | 
      Surface
      
      Pat and Bob,
       Thanks for updating me on the "hingeless" aileron that the Zenith 601/650 
      has. Very good article. 
                                                          Dick Maddux
                                                          Pensacola,Fl
      **************Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web.  
      Try the new Email Toolbar now! 
      (http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.html?ncid=txtlnkusdown00000027)
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH | 
      701
      
      
      
      motoadve wrote:
      > Thanks a lot for the replies.
      > 
      > Wouldnt the CH 701 be safer at a stall speed of 30mph instead of 37of the kitfox
      4 or 41 in the Super sport?
      > 
      > According to this numbers the Kitfox will stop flying before the CH 701 in case
      of an emergency.
      > 
      > 
      
      
      You can put VG's ( Vortex Generators ) on the Kitfox, and the stall numbers will
      be very close to the CH-701 if not the same...  When you are only talking 2
      or 3 MPH, there is no safety difference anymore due to speed, other things become
      much more important.
      
      The Superior glide ratio of the Kitfox is a HUGE safety factor.  Lets say you where
      at an altitude where you could glide a mile in a Zenair CH-701 and your engine
      quit, that would give you an area of 3.14
       Square miles that you could land in.  Now lets say you were in a Kitfox that has
      twice the glide ratio and your engine quit, you would have an area of  12.5
      square miles in which to find a landing area.  In other words, if you double
      the glide of an airplane, you have FOUR TIMES the amount of area to search potential
      landing spots.    I am not saying the Kitfox does have exactly twice the
      glide, but it is a LOT better than the CH-701, and every time you double the
      glide ratio, landing areas increase by a factor of FOUR !!
      
      The Kitfox will also give you more time in an engine out situation due to its much
      lower sink rate.  Again, would you rather have 1 minute to chose a spot, and
      execute an emergency landing, or 2 minutes, the Kitfox has a HUGE safety advantage
      over the Zenith CH-701 in an engine out situation.
      
      So that is the engine out performance comparison in a nutshell, Dave, did you read
      my post about the performance comparison of the Kitfox and the Zenair CH-701
      that is located here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=57516
      
      Mike
      
      --------
      "NO FEAR" -  If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could
      have !!!
      
      Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241208#241208
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      Ok here is a summary of all of the info available on Lift Reserve 
      indicators on the net.  Its all there for you to sort out!!
      
      http://www.surpluscenter.com/item.asp?UID 07040300014143&catname=air&qty
      1&item=21-1623
      http://www.ronleclerc.com/photos/panel/liftreserve-gaugefaces.pdf
      http://www.ronleclerc.com/photos/panel/lri-guage6.jpg
      http://www.ronleclerc.com/photos/panel/lri-guage2.jpg
      http://glasairproject.com/GlasairI/docs/AirsoobLRI.pdf
      http://home.hiwaay.net/~sbuc/journal/liftreserve.htm
      http://lri.kit.googlepages.com/
      http://www.liftreserve.com/
      
      The probes could be had from John Bolding  jnbolding1@teleshare.net   and 
      Scott at http://www.cooknwithgas.com/LRI.html
      I purchased mine from John Bolding for $30!
      http://www.ronleclerc.com/photos/panel/lri-guage5.jpg
      
      http://www.pipcom.com/~cowcam/AOAr.htm
      
      There is a lot of info to go through... the most expensive one you can buy 
      is a heated unit at  http://www.liftreserve.com/  if you decide to buy one!
      
      R.D.(Ron) Leclerc
      CH701 Plans(Scrap)  Builder #7-6699
      Porsche Power  Geared  Redrive
      Winnipeg,  MB Canada
      infow@mts.net
      4/25/2009 11:14:29 AM
      ***************************************
      This E-Mail scanned with AVG Anti-Virus Ver: 7.5!
      ***************************************
      
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( Randy,
      :-(
      :-( Below is the reply from Kelly, along with a shout-out to you.
      :-(
      :-( His kit is at http://lri.kit.googlepages.com and looks really
      :-( good, at the same price you paid for it. I'll be getting one!
      :-(
      :-( Thanks again for the reference Randy,
      :-(
      :-( Bob Brennan - N717GB
      :-( ELSA Repairman, inspection rated
      :-( 1991 UK Model 2 ELSA Kitfox taildragger
      :-( Rotax 582 with 3 blade GSC prop
      :-( Wrightsville Pa
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( ------------------------------------------------------------------
      :-( ---------- ---- From: Kelly Meiste
      :-( [mailto:kellymeiste@jcwifi.com] Sent: 24 April 2009 4:41 pm To:
      :-( matronics@bob.brennan.name Subject: Re: Lift Reserve
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( Hi Bob,
      :-(
      :-( Thank you for the info, glad Randy is enjoying his kit!
      :-(
      :-( Here's the link to my website, not much has changed.
      :-( lri.kit.googlepages.com
      :-(
      :-( Price is still the same, but I've added a few more options (black
      :-( gauge overlay, and a longer tube option).
      :-(
      :-( Thanks for the interest, let me know if I can answer any more
      :-( questions for you.
      :-(
      :-( Best regards,
      :-( Kelly
      :-(
      :-( PS. Feel free to post anything about my kit (good OR bad).
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( ----- Original Message -----
      :-( From: Bob Brennan
      :-( To: kellymeiste@jcwifi.com
      :-( Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:30 PM
      :-( Subject: Lift Reserve
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( Kelly,
      :-(
      :-( There is a  discussion going on right now about Lift Reserve on
      :-( the Matronics Kitfox list, started by Randy Daughenbaugh who has
      :-( raved about how good it is. I went to http://www.liftreserve.com/
      :-( right away and would have ordered it on the spot just from
      :-( Randy's recommendation but was stunned by the $450 +$35 S&H
      :-( price. He said he had "paid $175 for it but that was a few years
      :-( ago" and that I should get in touch with you directly. At a
      :-( better price I would order one right away and if I were to post
      :-( it on the mailing list, with your permission of course, I think
      :-( you would get several orders today alone.
      :-(
      :-( Thanks in advance,
      :-( Bob Brennan
      :-(
      :-(
      :-( List Features Navigator to browse
      :-( =               - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
      :-( your generous support!
      :-( -> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
      
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Charging system trouble shooting | 
      
      
      Heres how your charging sytem works. I should caution that while it's 
      extremely simple, if you have no idea how electricity works, maybe you 
      should recruit someone who does.
      
      You have a series of coils on your engine, by the flywheel. They come out to 
      two wires one yellow and one yellow with a black stripe. Those wires have a 
      resistance between them of about .5 of an OHM, on a cheap meter that as 
      close to a short as you can see. You should then connect one side of your 
      ohm meter to the engine block and the other side to one of those yellow 
      wires, you should see an infinite resistance, an open. The magnets we'll 
      take on faith.
      
      When the engine is spinning you will get AC electricity generated out those 
      two wires, the power available increases with RPM's voltage will top out far 
      beyond anything you want (about 40V) when there is no load. This AC goes 
      into the yellow wires on the stock rotax RR (rectifier/regulator), two of 
      the yellow wires on a Tympanium, or the terminals marked input (ac) on your 
      Key West. (the stock unit is also made by Tympanium, but they are not 
      identical)
      
      Each of these units will rectify AC to DC and in the case of the stock and 
      Tympanium rectifiers dump all excess power to ground, supplying  12-14 V DC 
      out the red wire on the stock unit and the black wire on the Tympanium.  The 
      return path on the stock unit is the black wire which goes to the best 
      ground you can find, on the tympanium the case is the return path, it must 
      be grounded and running a separate ground wire to the electrical GND by the 
      battery wouldn't hurt. For the Key West, the + terminal goes to the positive 
      side of the battery and the - terminal goes to the best GND you can find. 
      There should be NO resistance between the battery - and the rectifier - and 
      a suitable gauge should be used for about 16A current on both leads along 
      with suitable fuses and or relays. There is no indication of a requirement 
      to ground the case on the Key West in any documentation that I can find, but 
      it couldn't hurt, even if it's just to help shed heat. The Tympanium and the 
      stock unit case must be grounded.
      
      When the engine is running, if you are brave enough to get hear the big 
      spinning thing, you will see up to 40V AC on the open circuit yellow wires, 
      and you should see 12.5-14V on the output of the Tympanium and the Key West, 
      that's between + and - with nothing else connected. With the stock RR you'll 
      get a whole range of high voltages because it can't regulate without a load, 
      connect a lamp (taillight or something similar) and measure across that and 
      you should get the same 12-13 V.  After you connect it to the battery, you 
      will of course see 11.8-12.8V in any case. You can see if the voltage rises 
      across the battery while the engine runs, it should go up to 13.1-13.5 a 
      little higher is OK.
      
      There is a possibility that there exists a resistance in the AC side that 
      cannot be seen until current is flowing, it will appear as low resistance to 
      the meter but will restrict current flow, it's rare(ish) and I'd bet that 
      it's not your problem. It will exhibit as lower voltage as load increases 
      (without battery) but it is easy to fool yourself  as this is also normal, 
      it's a matter of degree and it really requires experience to diagnose.
      
      As far as your Hobbs goes, if you have run the engine for a couple of hours 
      and no measured it, it's a sure bet you have it hooked up wrong or it's 
      broken. The hobbs is a simple clock that runs as long as it sees the 
      appropriate voltage (DC in most cases) on the terminals. if you hooked it to 
      the master it will clock all the time the master is on. It should not in any 
      case be hooked to the yellow wires.
      
      I have no idea if this will help, and if your aircraft bursts into flames or 
      you damage somethng by doing anything I've said, it's all on you!
      
      If someone sees an error in the above point it out, don't get into the finer 
      points of electron flow or power calculations, think grade school level of 
      electrics.
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Charging system trouble shooting | 
      
      I'd still start with the grounding.  All regulators require grounding
      whether through a wire or through the case.
      
      
      Assuming your grounding is good put an AC volt tester across the two yellow
      or yellow and red tracer wires coming from the magneto end of the engine and
      run the engine.  You should see some AC voltage on your meter.  In fact you
      should see a decent voltage ??? 12 - 15VAC.???  If you don't see any voltage
      there with the engine running you definitely have a problem with the
      lighting coil in the magneto.
      
      
      Assuming you have good AC voltage in the two yellow wires then the problem
      has to be in the regulator.  Actuallyu it's a regulator/ rectifier bridge.
      
      
      Noelimg002.jpg
      
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of WurlyBird
      Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 1:17 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Charging system trouble shooting
      
      
      <james.t.trizzino@us.army.mil>
      
      
      So does it matter about the grounding so much now that the type of regulator
      is clarified?  What is a logical starting point for trouble shooting,
      assuming the battery is fine, and the mags are fine?
      
      
      --------
      
      James
      
      Kitfox 3 / 582 / GSC prop
      
      Just about ready to take my check ride.
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241173#241173
      
      
Message 13
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
      
      
      I notice the glue collar completely separated from the root cuff.  That one
      may have been caught by a careful inspection of the cuffs.
      
      Noel
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of dave
      Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 7:53 AM
      Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: GSC props
      
      
      Now that GSC are once again a good prop  here is one that I had to fix the
      broken engine mount on a couple of years ago .  This one was always kept
      indoors, never over tightened. Wood did not seem rotted and blades were not
      loose.  
      http://www.cfisher.com/gsc/
      Owner was in Mid 80s at  the time and noticed on run up something was not
      right and taxied back to his hangar and a few feet from the door it shed one
      blade.  Usually when a prop departs on a Rotax the carbs jump out of the
      rubber boots and engine shuts down. 
      
      
      JetPilot wrote:
      > Lowell,
      > 
      > You observation of the numbers of GSC props sold and reported problems
      does make a very good point.  I have to agree with you, given the numbers of
      props sold, GSC props are not dangerous if installed properly.  I would not
      take that to mean they are the best prop available now, a lot of
      advancements have been made in sport propellers since the 1980's when
      kitfoxes started using GSC props.
      > 
      > This thread has been one of the better ones this forum has seen in a
      while.  A reminder of important maintenance procedures is a a good thing.
      I think the many people here flying with GSC props will be extra vigilant in
      making sure their props are properly cared for and properly torqued.  This
      is even better information for those buying a used Kitfox with a GSC prop
      already on it, they will most likely do a better inspection and re torquing
      of the prop given the information here.
      > 
      > Mike
      
      
      --------
      Rotax Dealer, Ontario Canada
      http://www.cfisher.com/
      Awesome *New Forum *
      http://rotaxaircraft.com/forum/
      Realtime Kitfox movies to separate  the internet  chatter from the truth  
      http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=kitfoxflyer
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=241183#241183
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |