Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Mon 11/02/09


Total Messages Posted: 23



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:24 AM - Re: 2 pictures for you (Dave G)
     2. 04:47 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (bjones@dmv.com)
     3. 04:53 AM - Re: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (W Duke)
     4. 05:14 AM - Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (FlyboyTR)
     5. 05:20 AM - Re: Fuel flow issues (Tom Jones)
     6. 05:34 AM - Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks (Lynn Matteson)
     7. 06:12 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Lynn Matteson)
     8. 07:08 AM - Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks (malpass)
     9. 07:47 AM - Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed (akflyer)
    10. 08:12 AM - Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank (bjones@dmv.com)
    11. 08:13 AM - Re: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (Danny)
    12. 08:22 AM - Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (FlyboyTR)
    13. 09:05 AM - Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks (Guy Buchanan)
    14. 09:10 AM - Re: Kitfox-List Digest: 19 Msgs - 11/01/09 (Ed Gray)
    15. 09:15 AM - Re: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (Aerobatics@aol.com)
    16. 10:43 AM - Re: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed (verizon)
    17. 10:43 AM - Re: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank (Lynn Matteson)
    18. 11:15 AM - Re: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed (verizon)
    19. 12:17 PM - Re: Leaky Header tank (DanM)
    20. 02:25 PM - Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank (n85ae)
    21. 02:55 PM - Re: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank (bjones@dmv.com)
    22. 02:55 PM - Re: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank (bjones@dmv.com)
    23. 04:05 PM - Re: Re: Leaky Header tank (Patrick Reilly)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:24:52 AM PST US
    From: "Dave G" <occom@ns.sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Re: 2 pictures for you
    Congrats Ed, Can you post or send photos of the header tank installation behind the seat and the plumbing please? I also use that tank in it's original location and will want to move it to reflect current design. Thanks. Dave Goddard KF IV 1050 / 582 / Warp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Gray" <egraylaw@swbell.net> Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 10:44 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: 2 pictures for you > > Kitfox folks, my Model II, rotax 532 with GSC fixed pitch prop is now > flying, after a long dormant period. After being purchased from Denny in > 1990 is sat in a barn in Arkansas for 18 years (the owner died) before I > started construction in April of '08. It is all built per 1990 > instructions > excepting the leading edge of wings. I used the McBean plastic extrusion > and covered the upper surface 12 inches behind that with .016 aluminum > from > ACSpruce, eliminating the scalloped shape. It came with 2 six gallon > alum. > wing tanks which feed a round alum. header tank which I opted to place > behind the copilot seat. > > It flies great, jumps off the runway in about 100 feet and climbs about > 900 > fpm at 800 lbs. I put a GSC sport EFIS in the panel to handle all flight > info without vacuum. It also gives me map, airport data, terrain and > "highway in the sky" approaches. After two hours flying, I still can't > digest all the info its giving me. It cruises at 75 mph at 5500 rpm and > tops at 88 mph. I still need to add fairings to the jury struts and > landing > gear, and wheel pants would help too. > > Many thanks to the McBeans for advice and support, and many others on this > list who have answered questions and offered tips. As one guy said, > "plane > is flying and now tinkering begins". I got some home made floats from > Kasper > in Canada, and plan on installing them sometime next spring. Then > finishing > his retract system which is actuated by compressed air. That promises to > be > fun. Anyone flying in DFW area let me know and we will fly together. My > plane on the trailer lives in my garage. Maybe I will get to Sun n Fun > next > year. Next project, start saving so I can buy a New super sport from > KITFOX > LLC. > PS, anyone have wheel pants for 18 inch wheels for sale? > > PPS My GSC prop is a 10 degree climb prop. The guy at GSC said I could > ream the holes thru the roots a few degrees to make it ground adjustable. > Has anyone done that, and how many degrees would I want to add to make a > cruise prop? > > PPPS I found that I need to budget an extra half hour at the airport to > answer all the questions from admirers--aint that fun? > > Ed Gray Dallas KII 582 GSC > > DSCN1082.JPG > DSCN1086.JPG > > These pictures were sent with Picasa, from Google. > Try it out here: http://picasa.google.com/ >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:47:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5)
    From: bjones@dmv.com
    This extended discussion on fuel flow issues has been just the sort of thing I want out of the list sereve. When I unport my right wing tank during a prolonged descent with low fuel (model IV with large tanks) I watch fuel drain down out of the vent line until the glass tube inline filter housing empties and does not refill unless I crack the seal on it on the ground, then fuel instantly flows. This has occurred several times even with new filter elements, clean finger strainers in the tanks, new fuel lines throughout, and lots of attention to straight fuel lines between wing tanks and header tank. Rather than removing the in line filter elements, I may try placing some larger openings in the elements. The idea being less resistance but ability to monitor for crud. Thanks to those who have posted comments and to the list serve manager for making this (and other discussions possible.) B J N154K model IV > > Sorry...I missed that... No, I have baffles in the tank. Can't see that > area of the tank. ...which I could! :? > > -------- > Travis Rayner > Mobile, AL > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop > ADI-II Autopilot > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270320#270320 > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:09 AM PST US
    From: W Duke <n981ms@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure
    I don't have the receipt in front of me and I talked to several places but I think it was www.qualityaircraftaccessories.com/-.- The price was jus t under 500 if they rebuilt mine and returned.--Just over 500-if they went ahead and sent one they already had. Maxwell Duke S6/TD/IO240 Dublin, GA --- On Sat, 10/31/09, FlyboyTR <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> wrote: From: FlyboyTR <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure Maxwell, Where are you ordering your coupling?---The best price I've found so far on a rebuilt unit is $525. Travis -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240,- Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270260#270260 le, List Admin. =0A=0A=0A


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:14:09 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure
    From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net>
    Quality Aircraft sent me a quote of $550. They get their rebuilt couplings from Drake Air (same company I purchased my "failed unit" from, 254 hours ago). I guess I will be ordering tomorrow. ...I feel so used! [Shocked] I am still perplexed how such a simple part cost so much. The current NEW pricing from TCM is $1,997.97. -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270560#270560


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:37 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow issues
    From: "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net>
    > I have many hours in flights of four or more - up to ten Kitfoxes, and can state that lots of guys fly with one wing low. Lowell. You are right about that. I often catch myself flying with one will low. I don't have any rudder trim tab and must pay attention with my feet to fly straight. -------- Tom Jones Classic IV 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp Ellensburg, WA Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270562#270562


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:52 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks
    I found it best to drain the tanks either by a custom-made electric fuel pump, with a hose placed into the filler hole, and the other end in a fuel can, or by the siphon method. In either case get the remaining fuel down to at least the 5-gallon level or less. If you don't, when the wings are folded, fuel will be forced up into the cap/ vent area, and will come out of the cap when folded. The other reason for reducing the fuel in the wings is to reduce the weight that will be brought to bear on the pivot bolt at the rear spar. If you're planning on trailering your Kitfox, it is best to support the wing from the front spar attachment hole down to the lift strut lower attachment lug. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:28 PM, cschmokel wrote: > > Hey everybody, > > Full disclosure .. I'm a newbie pilot, owner operator, mechanic, > etc etc. > > I decided to try folding my Kitfox 5 taildragger wings back .. and > was told by a former Kitfox 4 owner that draining most of the fuel > is a good idea otherwise it will spill. > > OK, so I pulled the sump plug on the wing and started collecting > gas. After about a minute, I noticed gas spurting out holes in the > trailing edge of the wing. I replaced the sump plug and injected > soapy water into the holes to dilute the gas and hopefully get rid > of most of it. Apparently the sump plug is recessed too far and it > ends up draining into the wing partially. > > - Was this the right thing to do? > - What now? Should I just leave it as is and let whatever water/ > soap/gas mixture in the wings evaporate? > - Do I really need to drain the tanks to fold the wings back? > > Thanks guys > > Carl > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270541#270541 > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:12:28 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5)
    Could it be that your vent line has a uphill/downhill portion in it? That could be one reason that the fuel won't fill the filters. What I *think* is happening is this: You run the header tank low by using fuel from it instead of the tanks when you unport the wing tanks in your descent. Then with the plane at ground attitude, fuel tries to come down the fuel lines through the filters and into the header tank. Some does (maybe), but apparently not all unless you "crack the seal". I believe that when the fuel tries to flow into the header tank it is trying to overcome air trapped inside the header tank....trapped because of fuel that is trapped in the uphill/ downhill vent line, and can't be pushed uphill by the downflowing fuel in the fuel lines. I've had the same thing happen with my plane.....watching the vent line empty during the descent (and of course the fuel line is emptying at the same time....and I've been lucky enough to tip the plane to an attitude that allows for a "mid- air re-fueling" if you will. But I was very careful to make certain of there being NO uphill/downhill sections in my vent line. It would seem to me that this scenario that I just suggested would require just a certain amount of fuel trying to come down the fuel lines *versus* a certain amount of fuel trapped in the uphill/ downhill vent line, or a certain amount of volume of lines for this to happen. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:38 AM, bjones@dmv.com wrote: > > This extended discussion on fuel flow issues has been just the sort of > thing I want out of the list sereve. > > When I unport my right wing tank during a prolonged descent with > low fuel > (model IV with large tanks) I watch fuel drain down out of the vent > line > until the glass tube inline filter housing empties and does not refill > unless I crack the seal on it on the ground, then fuel instantly > flows. > > This has occurred several times even with new filter elements, clean > finger strainers in the tanks, new fuel lines throughout, and lots of > attention to straight fuel lines between wing tanks and header tank. > > Rather than removing the in line filter elements, I may try placing > some > larger openings in the elements. The idea being less resistance but > ability to monitor for crud. > > Thanks to those who have posted comments and to the list serve > manager for > making this (and other discussions possible.) > > B J > N154K model IV > > >> <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> >> >> Sorry...I missed that... No, I have baffles in the tank. Can't >> see that >> area of the tank. ...which I could! :? >> >> -------- >> Travis Rayner >> Mobile, AL >> Skystar Vixen, N-789DF >> Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop >> ADI-II Autopilot >> AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270320#270320 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:39 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks
    From: "malpass" <malpass-architect@att.net>
    A mechanical siphon is the best way and remove only what the siphon will allow. No chance of electrical sparks with a drill. There is a great device at Northern Tools which is a clear flex line that is a bout 3/4" in diameter, with an interesting siphon ball in the end. Just insert and shake about 3 times and wallah!, here comes the fuel. Its almost as fun as flying the plane. (not really). I can then spent time getting the plane ready to trailer. You don't need to remove all the fuel unless you have a reason for doing so. I added about 4 more feet of tubing to run over to my gas container on the trailer. The drain line is under 10 bucks. -------- kitfox III w/ 582 greyhead Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270580#270580


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:24 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed
    From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com>
    swap the coils you have, and see if the issue follows the coils. Hopefully it does and this is the cheap fix! Just swap the plugs coming out of the engine and it will swap coils. As the stator is redundant, you should have a hot spark on one front, one rear plug if there is an issue with the stator. To loose both front plugs, then you would have to loose the same coils on the stator. Not a very likely event. Did you try to turn the engine over with the plugs out and not grounded? Can you get a picture of the melted wires? I am assuming the heat came from the exhaust and not from electrical heat. If there was enough resistance in the wires to cause them to overheat and melt, you have bigger issues. -------- DO NOT ARCHIVE Leonard Perry aka SNAKE Soldotna AK Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV 582 IVO IFA Full Lotus 1450 #1 snake oil salesman since 1-22-2009 hander outer of humorless darwin awards Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270584#270584


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank
    From: bjones@dmv.com
    Lynn, Thanks for the suggestion. Once on the ground, I can see the entire vent line run in my application. There is no fuel trapped in it in low spots and no low spots to hold fuel. So for fuel not to flow when I cover the fuel tank pickup with gas Almost seems to defy laws of physics as I understand them. I susspect low head pressure and marginal resistance from the inline filter element that others have alluded to is at play. The left wing tank feeds faster so I generally put more gas in it prior to departure, consequently the left tank may not have unported in the descents. I am tempted to try clear fuel lines on all runs from wing tanks to header tank to see if fuel is caught in pockets on the feed lines and to see if fuel is still being drawn from the left wing tank. A couple of times when I have unported the right tank and stopped fuel flow thru that inline filter, I have climbed to altitude over my local airport (5,000' long) to see if I run the header tank dry while I still have fuel in both wings or whether fuel will start to flow again when the header tank gets low enough but due to heavy traffic with jet ops mixed in and being a bit nervous about it, I have not given this an nadequate trial. BJ N154K model IV Rotax 912 about 600 hours > > Could it be that your vent line has a uphill/downhill portion in it? > That could be one reason that the fuel won't fill the filters. What I > *think* is happening is this: You run the header tank low by using > fuel from it instead of the tanks when you unport the wing tanks in > your descent. Then with the plane at ground attitude, fuel tries to > come down the fuel lines through the filters and into the header > tank. Some does (maybe), but apparently not all unless you "crack the > seal". I believe that when the fuel tries to flow into the header > tank it is trying to overcome air trapped inside the header > tank....trapped because of fuel that is trapped in the uphill/ > downhill vent line, and can't be pushed uphill by the downflowing > fuel in the fuel lines. I've had the same thing happen with my > plane.....watching the vent line empty during the descent (and of > course the fuel line is emptying at the same time....and I've been > lucky enough to tip the plane to an attitude that allows for a "mid- > air re-fueling" if you will. But I was very careful to make certain > of there being NO uphill/downhill sections in my vent line. > > It would seem to me that this scenario that I just suggested would > require just a certain amount of fuel trying to come down the fuel > lines *versus* a certain amount of fuel trapped in the uphill/ > downhill vent line, or a certain amount of volume of lines for this > to happen. > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs > Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Rotec TBI-40 injection > Status: flying (and learning) > > > On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:38 AM, bjones@dmv.com wrote: > >> >> This extended discussion on fuel flow issues has been just the sort of >> thing I want out of the list sereve. >> >> When I unport my right wing tank during a prolonged descent with >> low fuel >> (model IV with large tanks) I watch fuel drain down out of the vent >> line >> until the glass tube inline filter housing empties and does not refill >> unless I crack the seal on it on the ground, then fuel instantly >> flows. >> >> This has occurred several times even with new filter elements, clean >> finger strainers in the tanks, new fuel lines throughout, and lots of >> attention to straight fuel lines between wing tanks and header tank. >> >> Rather than removing the in line filter elements, I may try placing >> some >> larger openings in the elements. The idea being less resistance but >> ability to monitor for crud. >> >> Thanks to those who have posted comments and to the list serve >> manager for >> making this (and other discussions possible.) >> >> B J >> N154K model IV >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> >>> >>> Sorry...I missed that... No, I have baffles in the tank. Can't >>> see that >>> area of the tank. ...which I could! :? >>> >>> -------- >>> Travis Rayner >>> Mobile, AL >>> Skystar Vixen, N-789DF >>> Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop >>> ADI-II Autopilot >>> AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Read this topic online here: >>> >>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270320#270320 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:13:57 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure
    From: Danny <vft@aol.com>
    I bought the rebuilt one I changed out in N24ZM from Drakes. Nice folks. I remember being shocked at the then $600 cost until they told me what a new one went for. Seeing as the one in N24ZM didn't make the 500 hr inspe ction I did talk to TCM about warranty. The reply I got was that the failu re was considered "normal". After a hung up the phone it was a few days be fore the pain wore off and I could sit again. Danny Melnik F1 N14ZM Rocket Factory Melbourne, FL -----Original Message----- From: FlyboyTR <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> Sent: Mon, Nov 2, 2009 8:11 am Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure Quality Aircraft sent me a quote of $550. They get their rebuilt coupling s from rake Air (same company I purchased my "failed unit" from, 254 hours ago). I uess I will be ordering tomorrow. ...I feel so used! [Shocked] I am st ill erplexed how such a simple part cost so much. The current NEW pricing fro m TCM s $1,997.97. -------- ravis Rayner obile, AL kystar Vixen, N-789DF ontinental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop DI-II Autopilot nyWhereMap Navigation with weather ead this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270560#270560 ======================== =========== - -= -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- -= (And Get Some AWESOME FREE Gifts!) - -= November is the Annual List Fund Raiser. Click on -= the Contribution link below to find out more about -= this year's Terrific Free Incentive Gifts provided -= by: -= * AeroElectric www.aeroelectric.com -= * The Builder's Bookstore www.buildersbooks.com -= * HomebuiltHELP www.homebuilthelp.com - -= List Contribution Web Site: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution - -= Thank you for your generous support! - -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. - -======================== ======================== =========== -= - The Kitfox-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List - -======================== ======================== =========== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== ======================== ===========


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:12 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure
    From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net>
    I decided to go ahead and order today. Purchased from aeroinstock.com for $525. Did you order a new alternator and starter gasket? I found that removing the starter made it easier to remove and install the alternator. If I remember correctly...there is one of the nuts that is almost impossible to get a wrench on...never did torque that one! :D -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270596#270596


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:05:19 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com>
    Subject: Re: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks
    At 08:28 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote: >Was this the right thing to do? Nope. Kind of hard in the wing internals. >- What now? Should I just leave it as is and let whatever >water/soap/gas mixture in the wings evaporate? Can you pull the wing tips? (Plug for all you builders: make sure you can remove the wing tips.) If not, can you get liquid into the wing from the inboard end? I'd give it a good wash with detergent. >- Do I really need to drain the tanks to fold the wings back? It depends. The only thing you want to ensure is that you don't blow the tanks by sealing them. First you will be replacing the existing caps with non vented ones available from most auto supply stores. (They're ugly, but hey, you're not going to fly with them.) This way, when you fold, you won't have fuel coming out the vents. Next you fold the wings. Finally, you need to have some kind of vent for the tanks. * If this is a temporary situation, pull the upper sight tube off it's nipple. The tank is now vented to atmosphere. * If this is a permanent installation, install a small fuel valve near the upper sight tube nipple. Open it when folded for vent, close it for flight. * Open the fuel system downstream and run a tube to a bucket above the tanks so that as the tank pressure changes, any fuel pushed out is captured. Obviously for one-time folding it's a lot easier to drain the fuel. What you need to drain the fuel is a decent drain port that makes it easy to drain the fuel without filling your wing. I like the Curtis quick drains from Aircraft Spruce. (http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/appages/curtisquickdv2.php) You can attach the optional hose to direct the flow anywhere you want. Obviously it takes a long time to drain a tank, so it's not something you want to do every flight. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 400 hrs. and counting


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:10:40 AM PST US
    From: "Ed Gray" <egraylaw@swbell.net>
    Subject: RE: Kitfox-List Digest: 19 Msgs - 11/01/09
    Chris, thanks for the compliment! As to leading edge, you could easily install the McBean extrusion with epoxy then cover it with an 8 inch strip of fabric and paint to match your wing. I made a hinge of masking tape, applied the glue and pivoted the extrusion into place and taped to down till glue sets--simple procedure. As to radiator, I used the McBean air scoop and engine runs at 180 or below even stationary at 95 degrees ambient. In flight it stays very cool, and I like the looks of the airscoop. Plus the scoop adds some speed? I am happy to hear that you got so much improvement by increasing your GSC prop pitch! Regarding trailering with gas in the tanks, I try not to trailer it with more than 1/2 tank, and I use a syphon which seems quicker than draining at gascolater. I bent a 3/8 aluminum tube into a ? shape so the end reaches the back corner of the wing tank and syphons nearly all the gas. Well, got to go fly now, got to get that 40 hours done! DFW fliers, get in touch! Ed Gray Dallas KII 582 do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kitfox-List Digest Server Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 2:00 AM Subject: Kitfox-List Digest: 19 Msgs - 11/01/09 * ================================================= Online Versions of Today's List Digest Archive ================================================= Today's complete Kitfox-List Digest can also be found in either of the two Web Links listed below. The .html file includes the Digest formatted in HTML for viewing with a web browser and features Hyperlinked Indexes and Message Navigation. The .txt file includes the plain ASCII version of the Kitfox-List Digest and can be viewed with a generic text editor such as Notepad or with a web browser. HTML Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=html&Chapter 09-11-01&Archive=Kitfox Text Version: http://www.matronics.com/digest/digestview.php?Style=82701&View=txt&Chapter 2009-11-01&Archive=Kitfox =============================================== EMail Version of Today's List Digest Archive =============================================== ---------------------------------------------------------- Kitfox-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Sun 11/01/09: 19 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 0. 12:18 AM - PLEASE READ - Matronics Email List Fund Raiser During November! (Matt Dralle) 1. 03:36 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Lynn Matteson) 2. 05:46 AM - Re: PLEASE READ - Matronics Email List Fund Raiser During November! (Frank Miles) 3. 05:47 AM - Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (FlyboyTR) 4. 07:12 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Jim_and_Lucy Chuk) 5. 08:01 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (fox5flyer) 6. 08:46 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Lynn Matteson) 7. 09:17 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Lynn Matteson) 8. 10:49 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Guy Buchanan) 9. 10:50 AM - Ducatti 582 Ignition needed (jareds) 10. 12:35 PM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (jareds@verizon.net) 11. 12:44 PM - Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed (jareds@verizon.net) 12. 01:58 PM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Dwight Purdy) 13. 03:58 PM - Re: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) (Lynn Matteson) 14. 06:38 PM - Fuel flow issues (Lowell FITT) 15. 06:59 PM - 2 pictures for you (Ed Gray) 16. 07:49 PM - Re: 2 pictures for you (carlisle) 17. 08:32 PM - Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks (cschmokel) 18. 11:52 PM - RE Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks (Michel Verheughe) ________________________________ Message 0 _____________________________________ Time: 12:18:14 AM PST US From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com> Subject: Kitfox-List: PLEASE READ - Matronics Email List Fund Raiser During November! Dear Listers, Each November I hold a PBS-like fund raiser to support the continued operation and upgrade of the List services at Matronics. It's solely through the Contributions of List members that these Matronics Lists are possible. There is NO advertising to support the Lists. You might have noticed the conspicuous lack of flashing banners and annoying pop-ups on the Matronics Email List email messages and web site pages such as the Matronics List Forums ( http://forums.matronics.com ), the List Wiki ( http://wiki.matronics.com), or other related pages such as the List Search Engine ( http://www.matronics.com/search ), the List Browser ( http://www.matronics.com/listbrowse ), etc. This is because I believe in a List experience that is completely about the sport we all enjoy - namely Airplanes and not about annoying advertisements. During the month of November I will be sending out List messages every couple of days reminding everyone that the Fund Raiser is underway. I ask for your patience and understanding during the Fund Raiser and throughout these regular messages. The Fund Raiser is only financial support mechanism I have to pay all of the bills associated with running these lists. Your personal Contribution counts! Once again, this year I've got a terrific line up of free gifts to go along with the various Contribution levels. Most all of these gifts have been provided by some of the vary members and vendors that you'll find on Matronics Lists and have been either donated or provided at substantially discounted rates. This year, these generous people include Bob Nuckolls of the AeroElectric Connection (http://www.aeroelectric.com/), Andy Gold of the Builder's Bookstore (http://www.buildersbooks.com/), and Jon Croke of HomebuiltHELP (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/). These are extremely generous guys and I encourage you to visit their respective web sites. Each one offers a unique and very useful aviation-related product line. I would like publicly to thank Bob, Andy, and Jon for their generous support of the Lists again this year!! You can make your List Contribution using any one of three secure methods this year including using a credit card, PayPal, or by personal check. All three methods afford you the opportunity to select one of this year's free gifts with a qualifying Contribution amount!! To make your Contribution, please visit the secure site below: http://www.matronics.com/contribution I would like to thank everyone in advance for their generous financial AND moral support over the years! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 03:36:14 AM PST US From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into my email box....I don't go to the "site". The only thing problem that this creates is when somebody doesn't include a snippet of what they are replying to...like you did here. But this thread is current enough that even my poor memory allows me to "connect the dots." The other problem is when someone only gets the "digest" and includes 44 messages in their reply, like I bitched about last week. : ) I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping all of my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system flows fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, wink, wink. ; ) Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: > > Lynn, > This problem happens, usually, when my tanks are more than 1/2 - > 3/4 full. To my knowledge I've never "unported" the tank by > descending at such an angle that the fuel moves away from the outlet. > > As so often happens on this forum, someone will reply to a post by > starting a new post with the same title (as happened to this > thread). If you haven't read my original post, please take a > look. :D I tried to explain the details and history of this > problem that comes and goes...I would prefer for it to go! [Laughing] > > Once I'm back in the air...should this happen again, I will remove > the filter element but keep the glass filter housing in place for > observation. > > Travis :) > > -------- > Travis Rayner > Mobile, AL > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop > ADI-II Autopilot > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270317#270317 > > ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 05:46:40 AM PST US From: "Frank Miles" <f.miles.tcp.833@clearwire.net> Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: PLEASE READ - Matronics Email List Fund Raiser During November! Please drop me from your list. Thank you. Frank Miles -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Matt Dralle Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 12:14 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: PLEASE READ - Matronics Email List Fund Raiser During November! Dear Listers, Each November I hold a PBS-like fund raiser to support the continued operation and upgrade of the List services at Matronics. It's solely through the Contributions of List members that these Matronics Lists are possible. There is NO advertising to support the Lists. You might have noticed the conspicuous lack of flashing banners and annoying pop-ups on the Matronics Email List email messages and web site pages such as the Matronics List Forums ( http://forums.matronics.com ), the List Wiki ( http://wiki.matronics.com), or other related pages such as the List Search Engine ( http://www.matronics.com/search ), the List Browser ( http://www.matronics.com/listbrowse ), etc. This is because I believe in a List experience that is completely about the sport we all enjoy - namely Airplanes and not about annoying advertisements. During the month of November I will be sending out List messages every couple of days reminding everyone that the Fund Raiser is underway. I ask for your patience and understanding during the Fund Raiser and throughout these regular messages. The Fund Raiser is only financial support mechanism I have to pay all of the bills associated with running these lists. Your personal Contribution counts! Once again, this year I've got a terrific line up of free gifts to go along with the various Contribution levels. Most all of these gifts have been provided by some of the vary members and vendors that you'll find on Matronics Lists and have been either donated or provided at substantially discounted rates. This year, these generous people include Bob Nuckolls of the AeroElectric Connection (http://www.aeroelectric.com/), Andy Gold of the Builder's Bookstore (http://www.buildersbooks.com/), and Jon Croke of HomebuiltHELP (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/). These are extremely generous guys and I encourage you to visit their respective web sites. Each one offers a unique and very useful aviation-related product line. I would like publicly to thank Bob, Andy, and Jon for their generous support of the Lists again this year!! You can make your List Contribution using any one of three secure methods this year including using a credit card, PayPal, or by personal check. All three methods afford you the opportunity to select one of this year's free gifts with a qualifying Contribution amount!! To make your Contribution, please visit the secure site below: http://www.matronics.com/contribution I would like to thank everyone in advance for their generous financial AND moral support over the years! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 05:47:56 AM PST US Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> Lynn, ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still only talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header tank. Once the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit from the "suction" of the mechanical pump. My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to check the finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so the fuel line doesn't have to have a hump in it before descending down towards the header tank. Thanks again for all your input...always appreciated! Travis Lynn Matteson wrote: > I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into my email box....I don't go to the "site". > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping all of > my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system flows > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, > wink, wink. ; ) > > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Rotec TBI-40 injection > Status: flying (and learning) > > > > > > > On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > :D -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 07:12:59 AM PST US From: Jim_and_Lucy Chuk <thesupe@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) When I first got my Avid MK IV=2C I put filters on both sides between the w ing tanks and the header tank. All was fine for a while (about 10-15 hrs) till one evening I took off from my strip and as I climbed out and got to 4 50'=2C the engine started to miss and spit. I ended up landing in a neighb ors field with no dammage to me or the plane. What had happened I found ou t the next day=2C was the filter on the tank I was using started to plug ju st a bit and so the flow was reduced. The engine never did die=2C but woul d not run up above about 4000 rpm. Durring the takeoff=2C it was turning u p about 6200=2C and when the small header tank was emptied=2C things got "i nteresting". I posted this account on the Avid list=2C and Steve Winder=2C who ran the Avid factory for years said NEVER HAVE FILTERS BETWEEN THE WIN G TANKS AND THE HEADER TANK. He used all capitol letters also! He said th at it takes very little to stop or slow the gravity flow=2C and ofcourse th at is what caused my problem. He also said=2C that the header tank works a s a gascolator to filter the fuel so the filters between the tanks aren't n eeded. I had a final filter between the header tank and the fuel pump=2C a nd so to gaurd against that one plugging and putting me in the trees=2C I p ut in a T in my fuel line and added a second filter alongside the first one and then a T back into the fuel line with a small valve to stop the flow t hrough that filter. When I'm taking off=2C I open that valve and then clos e it after I get up to 750' or so. If the main filter ever starts to plug while in flight=2C I will open the valve for the second filter and the fuel will be able to flow through that one and I will stay out of the trees. So far that has worked good for me and I still have potentialy three filter s to stop any crud getting to the carb. The header tank=2C the inline filt er=2C pluss the backup filter which will only be used if the first inline f ilter plugs. To each his own=2C but this works for me. I have always used the Fram paper filters and they have worked good for me. Take care=2C Jim Chuk > Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems=2C Again! (Vixen=2C Series-5 ) > From: flyboytr@bellsouth.net > Date: Sun=2C 1 Nov 2009 05:43:45 -0800 > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > > Lynn=2C > ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] > > I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still only ta lking about one filter between a wing tank and the header tank. Once the fu el is in the header tank it should then benefit from the "suction" of the m echanical pump. > > My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to check th e finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so the fuel line do esn't have to have a hump in it before descending down towards the header t ank. Thanks again for all your input...always appreciated! > > Travis > > > Lynn Matteson wrote: > > I've read all your posts=2C and all of any mail that comes into my emai l box....I don't go to the "site". > > > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping all of > > my filters=2C no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) > > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension=2C etc.=2C my system flo ws > > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge=2C nudge=2C > > wink=2C wink. =3B ) > > > > > > Lynn Matteson > > Kitfox IV Speedster=2C taildragger > > Jabiru 2200=2C #2062=2C 804.3 hrs > > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go > > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > > Rotec TBI-40 injection > > Status: flying (and learning) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 31=2C 2009=2C at 11:58 PM=2C FlyboyTR wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :D > > -------- > Travis Rayner > Mobile=2C AL > Skystar Vixen=2C N-789DF > Continental IO-240=2C Prince P-Tip Prop > ADI-II Autopilot > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 > > > > > > > ========== ========== ========== ========== > > > _________________________________________________________________ New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pc-scout/default.aspx?CBID=wl&ocid=PID 24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_pcscout:112009 ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 08:01:47 AM PST US From: "fox5flyer" <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) I know this thread has been going on forever and those who have wing tank filters will probably keep them. Fuel flow is probably one of the most important parts of our airplane so talking this to death can't hurt a thing. Here's my take, for whatever it's worth. Ideally, "IMO" the lines from the wing tanks to the header should be as large as practicable...3/8 ID would be good. To keep the head pressure as high as possible there should be no (unnecessary) restrictions between the tanks and the header, meaning no filters, valves, unnecessary fittings, or reducing fittings that restrict flow. After the header, the same applies, however, it's obvious that one needs at minimum a shutoff valve and usually a fuel pump of some sort. Since most fuel pumps are meant to push fuel, not suck, it should be at the lowest point in the system, generally just after the header and as close to it as practical. After the fuel pump things are not so critical as most pumps can push fuel pressure and volume far beyond what static flow can provide. Obviously, the 582s with diaphragm pumps wouldn't be very practical to be placed at this point, but to continue. There should be a shut off valve, generally on the console or wherever it's located that is easy to reach, again, IMO, the next restriction should be the filter. This should be a high flow filter and could be located on the firewall and be the last line of defense before it goes to the carb/TB/etc. Again, I stated "ideally" and is only my opinion. There are many other methods that work and some that don't, but as I recall a study was done at some point about forced landings and most were caused by fuel starvation. Everything that is put into the system between the fuel tanks and the engine is a restriction of some sort. Add them all up and it can be significant and even though the system may be working it may be marginally close to failure without one knowing it. Personally, I don't feel the filters in the lines from the tanks to the header are necessary at all. Between the finger strainers and the natural settling action of the header, plus the fuel sump at the bottom of the header, there is more than enough there to clean up the big stuff. The final filter at the firewall will take care of anything that somehow reaches that point. I expect that some will take issue with this, and that is fine and I'd like to hear it. Just be nice. :-) Have a great day! Deke Morisse Mikado Michigan S5/Subaru/CAP 438+ TT "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there'd be a shortage of sand." -- Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman (1912-2006) ----- Original Message ----- From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 8:43 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) > > Lynn, > ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] > > I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still only > talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header tank. Once > the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit from the "suction" > of the mechanical pump. > > My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to check the > finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so the fuel line > doesn't have to have a hump in it before descending down towards the > header tank. Thanks again for all your input...always appreciated! > > Travis > > > Lynn Matteson wrote: >> I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into my email >> box....I don't go to the "site". >> >> I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping all of >> my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) >> confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system flows >> fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, >> wink, wink. ; ) >> >> >> Lynn Matteson >> Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger >> Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs >> Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go >> Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop >> Electroair direct-fire ignition system >> Rotec TBI-40 injection >> Status: flying (and learning) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > :D > > -------- > Travis Rayner > Mobile, AL > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop > ADI-II Autopilot > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 > > > ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 08:46:38 AM PST US From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) The only problem I have....and this is just a shade-tree mechanics view...is the paper filter. It is said that they will clog if water gets to them. I can see the benefit of not having a filter in the line to the header tank, as the header tank DOES work like a gascolator, and as such will catch (and allow for the sampling of) any crud that might get there. I put the filters in my down...to the header...lines because I wanted to see any crud that just got into those lines from airport A, or airport B, etc., or from my own 300- gallon tank at home. Like you said, to each his own, and future or current builders will be able to choose for themselves what they think is right. And of course, each DAR will have his/her own views on what they will allow. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 1, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Jim_and_Lucy Chuk wrote: > When I first got my Avid MK IV, I put filters on both sides between > the wing tanks and the header tank. All was fine for a while > (about 10-15 hrs) till one evening I took off from my strip and as > I climbed out and got to 450', the engine started to miss and > spit. I ended up landing in a neighbors field with no dammage to > me or the plane. What had happened I found out the next day, was > the filter on the tank I was using started to plug just a bit and > so the flow was reduced. The engine never did die, but would not > run up above about 4000 rpm. Durring the takeoff, it was turning > up about 6200, and when the small header tank was emptied, things > got "interesting". I posted this account on the Avid list, and > Steve Winder, who ran the Avid factory for years said NEVER HAVE > FILTERS BETWEEN THE WING TANKS AND THE HEADER TANK. He used all > capitol letters also! He said that it takes very little to stop or > slow the gravity flow, and ofcourse that is what caused my > problem. He also said, that the header tank works as a gascolator > to filter the fuel so the filters between the tanks aren't needed. > I had a final filter between the header tank and the fuel pump, and > so to gaurd against that one plugging and putting me in the trees, > I put in a T in my fuel line and added a second filter alongside > the first one and then a T back into the fuel line with a small > valve to stop the flow through that filter. When I'm taking off, I > open that valve and then close it after I get up to 750' or so. If > the main filter ever starts to plug while in flight, I will open > the valve for the second filter and the fuel will be able to flow > through that one and I will stay out of the trees. So far that has > worked good for me and I still have potentialy three filters to > stop any crud getting to the carb. The header tank, the inline > filter, pluss the backup filter which will only be used if the > first inline filter plugs. To each his own, but this works for > me. I have always used the Fram paper filters and they have worked > good for me. > Take care, Jim Chuk > > > Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, > Series-5) > > From: flyboytr@bellsouth.net > > Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:43:45 -0800 > > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com > > > <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> > > > > Lynn, > > ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] > > > > I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still > only talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header > tank. Once the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit > from the "suction" of the mechanical pump. > > > > My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to > check the finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so > the fuel line doesn't have to have a hump in it before descending > down towards the header tank. Thanks again for all your > input...always appreciated! > > > > Travis > > > > > > Lynn Matteson wrote: > > > I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into > my email box....I don't go to the "site". > > > > > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping > all of > > > my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) > > > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system > flows > > > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, > > > wink, wink. ; ) > > > > > > > > > Lynn Matteson > > > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > > > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs > > > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go > > > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > > > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > > > Rotec TBI-40 injection > > > Status: flying (and learning) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :D > > > > -------- > > Travis Rayner > > Mobile, AL > > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF > > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop > > ADI-II Autopilot > > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more._- > ============================================================ _- > ============================================================ _- > ========================================================== ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 09:17:15 AM PST US From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) Probably more important than where a person decides to place the filters, valves, etc., is the decision to do a flow test after all the plumbing is done. That might reveal more than all the theory in the world. If the flow test shows marginal flow, change something! If it doesn't...... One of the discoveries that I made while changing to the TBI in place of the Bing carb, was I hadn't realized how far up the "flow chart" the carb/TBI was located. With my gravity flow ONLY system, if I have to point the nose up very steeply with low fuel....like when the header tank supply is the only fuel available....that fuel will not make it up to the TBI/carb. You folks with high-mounted carbs are almost certain candidates for a pumped system. If in doubt about the flow of your particular system, lay some masking paper on the side of the aircraft, and measure and plot where the various parts of the fuel system lie, and where the lines run. Draw these components onto the paper, then imagine the plane climbing, diving, banking, etc., and see where the fuel goes and also imagine a lower than normal fuel supply, and see where that leads you. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 1, 2009, at 10:28 AM, fox5flyer wrote: > <fox5flyer@idealwifi.net> > > I know this thread has been going on forever and those who have > wing tank filters will probably keep them. Fuel flow is probably > one of the most important parts of our airplane so talking this to > death can't hurt a thing. Here's my take, for whatever it's worth. > Ideally, "IMO" the lines from the wing tanks to the header should > be as large as practicable...3/8 ID would be good. To keep the > head pressure as high as possible there should be no (unnecessary) > restrictions between the tanks and the header, meaning no filters, > valves, unnecessary fittings, or reducing fittings that restrict > flow. After the header, the same applies, however, it's obvious > that one needs at minimum a shutoff valve and usually a fuel pump > of some sort. Since most fuel pumps are meant to push fuel, not > suck, it should be at the lowest point in the system, generally > just after the header and as close to it as practical. After the > fuel pump things are not so critical as most pumps can push fuel > pressure and volume far beyond what static flow can provide. > Obviously, the 582s with diaphragm pumps wouldn't be very practical > to be placed at this point, but to continue. There should be a shut > off valve, generally on the console or wherever it's located that > is easy to reach, again, IMO, the next restriction should be the > filter. This should be a high flow filter and could be located on > the firewall and be the last line of defense before it goes to the > carb/TB/etc. Again, I stated "ideally" and is only my opinion. > There are many other methods that work and some that don't, but as > I recall a study was done at some point about forced landings and > most were caused by fuel starvation. Everything that is put into > the system between the fuel tanks and the engine is a restriction > of some sort. Add them all up and it can be significant and even > though the system may be working it may be marginally close to > failure without one knowing it. > Personally, I don't feel the filters in the lines from the tanks to > the header are necessary at all. Between the finger strainers and > the natural settling action of the header, plus the fuel sump at > the bottom of the header, there is more than enough there to clean > up the big stuff. The final filter at the firewall will take care > of anything that somehow reaches that point. > I expect that some will take issue with this, and that is fine and > I'd like to hear it. Just be nice. :-) > Have a great day! > Deke Morisse > Mikado Michigan > S5/Subaru/CAP 438+ TT > "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara > Desert, in five years there'd be a shortage of sand." > -- Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman (1912-2006) > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "FlyboyTR" <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 8:43 AM > Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 10:49:06 AM PST US From: Guy Buchanan <bnn@nethere.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) At 12:07 PM 10/31/2009, you wrote: >I folded the wing to check the finger strainers. I was unable to >remove the 90 fitting (see picture). To do do would mean I would >have to cut the fabric in the bottom of the wing. Any >suggestions? does this look like the KF setup? Doncha jes hate it when someone doesn't think about maintenance? The finger strainer, if there is one, is built into the brass bushing that the elbow is screwed into. Yes, it unscrews from the fiberglass, another maintenance nightmare that Kitfox didn't think about. (Why would anyone ever need to look at a finger strainer? Geee. I dunno.) Unfortunately you're right, you'd have to cut the fabric to pull the elbow. The only maintenance alternative I can see is to drain the tanks, pull the wings, flip them over, then blow fluid through the fuel outlet to try to clear the finger strainers. Then slosh the tanks with fluid to make sure any large particulates get out the filler cap. Fun, huh? The finger strainers are really course, say about .04". So generally the only things that don't go through them are when the Kreem sheets off, or when you drop your TCP additive cap gasket into the tank. (Don't ask.) That means you probably never need to look at them; only when you're having fuel flow problems. (Like NOW. Are we having fun yet?) Sorry for the bad news. Guy Buchanan San Diego, CA K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 400 hrs. and counting ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 10:50:39 AM PST US From: jareds <jareds@verizon.net> Subject: Kitfox-List: Ducatti 582 Ignition needed Wierd thing going on. Both Rear plugs have hot spark but front plugs have weak spark. Engine seems to try to run on one cylinder when i try to start it. I know that each cylinders plugs are fired by each coil so does this mean that one top or bottom side of each ignition module is bad? There is some heat damage to the front ignition. I can see on the wires where it may have gotten warm enough to melt wiring etc... but the rear one looks fine. Does someone have one or two ignition modules laying around that are new or used but that are working? Thanks. ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 12:35:37 PM PST US From: jareds@verizon.net Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) I have not read most of the posts and you may have already gotten this info but I will never get rid of my glass filters at the wing tanks.. VITAL in flight to physically see the fuel flow and see whats maybe sitting in my tanks. What I don't see unless I look very close is the little bits of fiberglass but I keep filter elements handy and change very often. As to the fuel flow.. Don Smythe cured my issues years ago when I was in DC. He said "Always down hill" and even with a little bump in the hoses its ok but the critical one is the vent line. And to me that's the biggest obstical because its always in the way to making a neat cockpit but when I am cruising along and my header tank fuel low light comes on I can always look at my vent line and know its got a dip in it! Hope that helps. Jared Nov 1, 2009 07:54:21 AM, kitfox-list@matronics.com wrote: ========================================= Lynn, ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still only talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header tank. Once the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit from the "suction" of the mechanical pump. My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to check the finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so the fuel line doesn't have to have a hump in it before descending down towards the header tank. Thanks again for all your input...always appreciated! Travis Lynn Matteson wrote: > I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into my email box....I don't go to the "site". > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping all of > my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system flows > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, > wink, wink. ; ) > > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Rotec TBI-40 injection > Status: flying (and learning) > > > > > > > On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > :D -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 12:44:09 PM PST US From: jareds@verizon.net Subject: Kitfox-List: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed Wierd thing going on. Both Rear plugs have hot spark but front plugs have weak spark. Engine seems to try to run on one cylinder when i try to start it. I know that each cylinders plugs are fired by each coil so does this mean that one top or bottom side of each ignition module is bad? There is some heat damage to the front ignition. I can see on the wires where it may have gotten warm enough to melt wiring etc... but the rear one looks fine. Does someone have one or two ignition modules laying around that are new or used but that are working? Thanks. ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 01:58:46 PM PST US From: "Dwight Purdy" <dpurdy@comteck.com> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) I do not comment often but listen a lot. On this subject of fuel filters will say that in my 32 years of flying I have never seen a filter on a GA certified aircraft. That does not include any of the newer fuel injected ones. I have had a paper filter for a short time on my model II. While running premix and some ethanol in the fuel I was forced to land off field. Once that paper gets oil soaked water will not pass properly. Took the filter out and no problem. Dwight Purdy Model II ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Matteson" <lynnmatt@jps.net> Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 11:42 AM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) > > The only problem I have....and this is just a shade-tree mechanics > view...is the paper filter. It is said that they will clog if water gets > to them. I can see the benefit of not having a filter in the line to the > header tank, as the header tank DOES work like a gascolator, and as such > will catch (and allow for the sampling of) any crud that might get there. > I put the filters in my down...to the header...lines because I wanted to > see any crud that just got into those lines from airport A, or airport B, > etc., or from my own 300- gallon tank at home. > Like you said, to each his own, and future or current builders will be > able to choose for themselves what they think is right. And of course, > each DAR will have his/her own views on what they will allow. > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs > Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Rotec TBI-40 injection > Status: flying (and learning) > > > On Nov 1, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Jim_and_Lucy Chuk wrote: > >> When I first got my Avid MK IV, I put filters on both sides between the >> wing tanks and the header tank. All was fine for a while (about 10-15 >> hrs) till one evening I took off from my strip and as I climbed out and >> got to 450', the engine started to miss and spit. I ended up landing in >> a neighbors field with no dammage to me or the plane. What had happened >> I found out the next day, was the filter on the tank I was using started >> to plug just a bit and so the flow was reduced. The engine never did >> die, but would not run up above about 4000 rpm. Durring the takeoff, it >> was turning up about 6200, and when the small header tank was emptied, >> things got "interesting". I posted this account on the Avid list, and >> Steve Winder, who ran the Avid factory for years said NEVER HAVE FILTERS >> BETWEEN THE WING TANKS AND THE HEADER TANK. He used all capitol letters >> also! He said that it takes very little to stop or slow the gravity >> flow, and ofcourse that is what caused my problem. He also said, that >> the header tank works as a gascolator to filter the fuel so the filters >> between the tanks aren't needed. I had a final filter between the >> header tank and the fuel pump, and so to gaurd against that one plugging >> and putting me in the trees, I put in a T in my fuel line and added a >> second filter alongside the first one and then a T back into the fuel >> line with a small valve to stop the flow through that filter. When I'm >> taking off, I open that valve and then close it after I get up to 750' >> or so. If the main filter ever starts to plug while in flight, I will >> open the valve for the second filter and the fuel will be able to flow >> through that one and I will stay out of the trees. So far that has >> worked good for me and I still have potentialy three filters to stop any >> crud getting to the carb. The header tank, the inline filter, pluss the >> backup filter which will only be used if the first inline filter plugs. >> To each his own, but this works for me. I have always used the Fram >> paper filters and they have worked good for me. >> Take care, Jim Chuk >> >> > Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, >> Series-5) >> > From: flyboytr@bellsouth.net >> > Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:43:45 -0800 >> > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com >> > >> <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> >> > >> > Lynn, >> > ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] >> > >> > I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still >> only talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header tank. >> Once the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit from the >> "suction" of the mechanical pump. >> > >> > My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to >> check the finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing so the >> fuel line doesn't have to have a hump in it before descending down >> towards the header tank. Thanks again for all your input...always >> appreciated! >> > >> > Travis >> > >> > >> > Lynn Matteson wrote: >> > > I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into >> my email box....I don't go to the "site". >> > > >> > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping >> all of >> > > my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) >> > > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system >> flows >> > > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, nudge, >> > > wink, wink. ; ) >> > > >> > > >> > > Lynn Matteson >> > > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger >> > > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs >> > > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go >> > > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop >> > > Electroair direct-fire ignition system >> > > Rotec TBI-40 injection >> > > Status: flying (and learning) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > :D >> > >> > -------- >> > Travis Rayner >> > Mobile, AL >> > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF >> > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop >> > ADI-II Autopilot >> > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Read this topic online here: >> > >> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more._- >> ============================================================ _- >> ============================================================ _- >> ========================================================== > > > ________________________________ Message 13 ____________________________________ Time: 03:58:12 PM PST US From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net> Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, Series-5) I think you'll find that the filter on a GA aircraft is disguised and called a gascolator...but I could be wrong. Inside my Rotec TBI is what is called a "last chance" filter. It catches the bad stuff that would otherwise try to plug the 50-some holes in the fuel discharge tube. These holes are reportedly . 010" (ten-thousandths of an inch) in diameter. I trust my Purolator glass filters to keep the last chance filter, and thence the fuel discharge tube, clean. I won't take my "pre-filters" out unless something or someone proves that this is an incorrect design. And as long as my gravity system flows more than twice what is needed by the engine, that likelihood seems remote. Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Dwight Purdy wrote: > > I do not comment often but listen a lot. > On this subject of fuel filters will say that in my 32 years of > flying I have never seen a filter on a GA certified aircraft. That > does not include any of the newer fuel injected ones. I have had a > paper filter for a short time on my model II. While running premix > and some ethanol in the fuel I was forced to land off field. Once > that paper gets oil soaked water will not pass properly. Took the > filter out and no problem. > > Dwight Purdy > Model II > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lynn Matteson" <lynnmatt@jps.net> > To: <kitfox-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 11:42 AM > Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, > Series-5) > > >> >> The only problem I have....and this is just a shade-tree mechanics >> view...is the paper filter. It is said that they will clog if >> water gets to them. I can see the benefit of not having a filter >> in the line to the header tank, as the header tank DOES work like >> a gascolator, and as such will catch (and allow for the sampling >> of) any crud that might get there. I put the filters in my >> down...to the header...lines because I wanted to see any crud >> that just got into those lines from airport A, or airport B, >> etc., or from my own 300- gallon tank at home. >> Like you said, to each his own, and future or current builders >> will be able to choose for themselves what they think is right. >> And of course, each DAR will have his/her own views on what they >> will allow. >> >> Lynn Matteson >> Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger >> Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs >> Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go >> Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop >> Electroair direct-fire ignition system >> Rotec TBI-40 injection >> Status: flying (and learning) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Nov 1, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Jim_and_Lucy Chuk wrote: >> >>> When I first got my Avid MK IV, I put filters on both sides >>> between the wing tanks and the header tank. All was fine for a >>> while (about 10-15 hrs) till one evening I took off from my >>> strip and as I climbed out and got to 450', the engine started >>> to miss and spit. I ended up landing in a neighbors field with >>> no dammage to me or the plane. What had happened I found out >>> the next day, was the filter on the tank I was using started to >>> plug just a bit and so the flow was reduced. The engine never >>> did die, but would not run up above about 4000 rpm. Durring the >>> takeoff, it was turning up about 6200, and when the small header >>> tank was emptied, things got "interesting". I posted this >>> account on the Avid list, and Steve Winder, who ran the Avid >>> factory for years said NEVER HAVE FILTERS BETWEEN THE WING TANKS >>> AND THE HEADER TANK. He used all capitol letters also! He said >>> that it takes very little to stop or slow the gravity flow, and >>> ofcourse that is what caused my problem. He also said, that the >>> header tank works as a gascolator to filter the fuel so the >>> filters between the tanks aren't needed. I had a final filter >>> between the header tank and the fuel pump, and so to gaurd >>> against that one plugging and putting me in the trees, I put in >>> a T in my fuel line and added a second filter alongside the >>> first one and then a T back into the fuel line with a small >>> valve to stop the flow through that filter. When I'm taking off, >>> I open that valve and then close it after I get up to 750' or >>> so. If the main filter ever starts to plug while in flight, I >>> will open the valve for the second filter and the fuel will be >>> able to flow through that one and I will stay out of the trees. >>> So far that has worked good for me and I still have potentialy >>> three filters to stop any crud getting to the carb. The header >>> tank, the inline filter, pluss the backup filter which will only >>> be used if the first inline filter plugs. To each his own, but >>> this works for me. I have always used the Fram paper filters >>> and they have worked good for me. >>> Take care, Jim Chuk >>> >>> > Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Fuel Flow Problems, Again! (Vixen, >>> Series-5) >>> > From: flyboytr@bellsouth.net >>> > Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 05:43:45 -0800 >>> > To: kitfox-list@matronics.com >>> > >>> <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> >>> > >>> > Lynn, >>> > ...you get to read a lot of email! [Shocked] >>> > >>> > I really don't want to get rid of my filters either. We are still >>> only talking about one filter between a wing tank and the header >>> tank. Once the fuel is in the header tank it should then benefit >>> from the "suction" of the mechanical pump. >>> > >>> > My last two hurdles are removing the wing tank outlet fitting to >>> check the finger strainers and cutting the root rib on the wing >>> so the fuel line doesn't have to have a hump in it before >>> descending down towards the header tank. Thanks again for all >>> your input...always appreciated! >>> > >>> > Travis >>> > >>> > >>> > Lynn Matteson wrote: >>> > > I've read all your posts, and all of any mail that comes into >>> my email box....I don't go to the "site". >>> > > >>> > > I doubt that the filter element is your problem. I'm keeping >>> all of >>> > > my filters, no matter how much certain engineers might (for me) >>> > > confuse the issue with talk of surface tension, etc., my system >>> flows >>> > > fuel as long as there's fuel in the system to flow...nudge, >>> nudge, >>> > > wink, wink. ; ) >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Lynn Matteson >>> > > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger >>> > > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 804.3 hrs >>> > > Countdown to 1000 hrs--196 to go >>> > > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop >>> > > Electroair direct-fire ignition system >>> > > Rotec TBI-40 injection >>> > > Status: flying (and learning) >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Oct 31, 2009, at 11:58 PM, FlyboyTR wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > :D >>> > >>> > -------- >>> > Travis Rayner >>> > Mobile, AL >>> > Skystar Vixen, N-789DF >>> > Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop >>> > ADI-II Autopilot >>> > AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Read this topic online here: >>> > >>> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270420#270420 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more._- >>> ============================================================ _- >>> ============================================================ _- >>> ========================================================== >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________ Message 14 ____________________________________ Time: 06:38:24 PM PST US From: Lowell FITT <lcfitt@sbcglobal.net> Subject: Kitfox-List: Fuel flow issues I re-read the initial post carefully and what comes to my mind is the much discussed - in times past - phenomenon of the fuel draining unevenly from the tanks. I can't suggest the best key word for an archive search, but there is a lot in there about this. It appears that the problems mentioned occur after a top off of the tanks where both tanks are full. I might suggest that what you are experiencing is the typical one tank draining faster than the other with no real fuel flow issues other than the cosmetic ones from looking at the transparent tubing and seeing the fuel differential in the tanks. As mentioned, there has been a lot of theorizing on why this happens. Some have placed fuel shut off valves to control it and some have learned to ignore it. To my knowledge, there has never been a Kitfox that had an engine stoppage with fuel in the tanks - assuming the system has been properly designed and maintained. What I might suggest. The next time you see it happening, purposely try flying a bit uncoordinated with the slow draining tank high and see if you see some difference in your fuel flow. I have many hours in flights of four or more - up to ten Kitfoxes, and can state that lots of guys fly with one wing low. With head pressure a recent discussion topic, a high wing tank will have significantly higher head pressure then the low wing tank and will drain more quickly than the low wing tank and might even trans fill to the low wing tank. With partially filled tanks the phenomenon will not be as pronounced. We had one pilot with a Franklin Powered Moddel V meet up with us at Elk City, Idaho and he was sweating bullets. He insisted that he had a fuel flow problem and would not fly another minute until it was checked out. With the six airplanes, we found enough tools to pretty much disassemble his fuel system. We tested everything including fuel flow in all the attitudes we could put the airplane in while on the ground and after he was satisfied, we flew the rest of the week with no incidents. In this case, he just needed to be reassured. Our airplanes are designed with no thrust offset in the engine mounts. This almost always requires some rudder input for coordinated flight or some rudder trim. With rudder trim, the typical trim tab is fixed and ground adjustable and will not result in perfect trim in all speed ranges. With a long cross country in mind, it is not uncommon to sort of fall asleep at the wheel and follow the GPS ,and enjoying the view without paying as much attention to the little black ball. Lowell ________________________________ Message 15 ____________________________________ Time: 06:59:20 PM PST US From: "Ed Gray" <egraylaw@swbell.net> Subject: Kitfox-List: 2 pictures for you Kitfox folks, my Model II, rotax 532 with GSC fixed pitch prop is now flying, after a long dormant period. After being purchased from Denny in 1990 is sat in a barn in Arkansas for 18 years (the owner died) before I started construction in April of '08. It is all built per 1990 instructions excepting the leading edge of wings. I used the McBean plastic extrusion and covered the upper surface 12 inches behind that with .016 aluminum from ACSpruce, eliminating the scalloped shape. It came with 2 six gallon alum. wing tanks which feed a round alum. header tank which I opted to place behind the copilot seat. It flies great, jumps off the runway in about 100 feet and climbs about 900 fpm at 800 lbs. I put a GSC sport EFIS in the panel to handle all flight info without vacuum. It also gives me map, airport data, terrain and "highway in the sky" approaches. After two hours flying, I still can't digest all the info its giving me. It cruises at 75 mph at 5500 rpm and tops at 88 mph. I still need to add fairings to the jury struts and landing gear, and wheel pants would help too. Many thanks to the McBeans for advice and support, and many others on this list who have answered questions and offered tips. As one guy said, "plane is flying and now tinkering begins". I got some home made floats from Kasper in Canada, and plan on installing them sometime next spring. Then finishing his retract system which is actuated by compressed air. That promises to be fun. Anyone flying in DFW area let me know and we will fly together. My plane on the trailer lives in my garage. Maybe I will get to Sun n Fun next year. Next project, start saving so I can buy a New super sport from KITFOX LLC. PS, anyone have wheel pants for 18 inch wheels for sale? PPS My GSC prop is a 10 degree climb prop. The guy at GSC said I could ream the holes thru the roots a few degrees to make it ground adjustable. Has anyone done that, and how many degrees would I want to add to make a cruise prop? PPPS I found that I need to budget an extra half hour at the airport to answer all the questions from admirers--aint that fun? Ed Gray Dallas KII 582 GSC DSCN1082.JPG DSCN1086.JPG These pictures were sent with Picasa, from Google. Try it out here: http://picasa.google.com/ ________________________________ Message 16 ____________________________________ Time: 07:49:36 PM PST US Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: 2 pictures for you From: "carlisle" <carlisle_99@yahoo.com> Ed...Beautiful! Mine's a model 2 (ser # 707), 582, GSC prop completed in 1991. Only complaint is that I live here in South Dakota now and weather precludes the amount of flying I'd like to do. Lived in Dallas/Denton for many years during college years. That leading edge mod looks nice, even from far away in the pics. Would definitely do that if I had it to do over again. That blunt front spar/leading edge that's standard is a big drag penalty. My GSC prop was also fixed pitch @ 10 deg. When I had it overhauled this year, I sent it to the factory. For $150, they beautifully restored the blades, balanced them, and feathered out the hole in the root of each blade for me so that it's now ground adjustable. Change from 10 to 11 degrees pitch gave me 5-7 mph faster level cruise @ 4-600 fewer rpm and 100 to 200 degrees cooler egt's. It just sounds and feels happier. What a difference one degree makes. Only other mod I'd recommend, especially in the hot Dallas summers, would be to make a couple of simple wooden standoff's to get the radiator out of the turbulent flow on the underbelly. I was pushing the red line on the coolant temp on warmer days before I did that one. Happy Flying! Chris Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270537#270537 ________________________________ Message 17 ____________________________________ Time: 08:32:41 PM PST US Subject: Kitfox-List: Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks From: "cschmokel" <cschmokel@gmail.com> Hey everybody, Full disclosure .. I'm a newbie pilot, owner operator, mechanic, etc etc. I decided to try folding my Kitfox 5 taildragger wings back .. and was told by a former Kitfox 4 owner that draining most of the fuel is a good idea otherwise it will spill. OK, so I pulled the sump plug on the wing and started collecting gas. After about a minute, I noticed gas spurting out holes in the trailing edge of the wing. I replaced the sump plug and injected soapy water into the holes to dilute the gas and hopefully get rid of most of it. Apparently the sump plug is recessed too far and it ends up draining into the wing partially. - Was this the right thing to do? - What now? Should I just leave it as is and let whatever water/soap/gas mixture in the wings evaporate? - Do I really need to drain the tanks to fold the wings back? Thanks guys Carl Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270541#270541 ________________________________ Message 18 ____________________________________ Time: 11:52:15 PM PST US From: Michel Verheughe <michel@online.no> Subject: Kitfox-List: RE Newbie mistake - pulled the sump plug to drain my tanks > From: cschmokel [cschmokel@gmail.com] > - Do I really need to drain the tanks to fold the wings back? I did it the few times I folded my wings, Carl. But I always drain the fuel from the gascolator; the lowest point in the system. It is also much easier because it drains directly in a jerrycan on the floor. Cheers, Michel Verheughe Norway Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 <pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier"> </b></font></pre>


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:15:16 AM PST US
    From: Aerobatics@aol.com
    Subject: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure
    Painful when you buy almost the exact same part from NAPA Aviation Supply for 60.00 and it has a full year warranty no questions.... hmmmmm PS send me more photos of your Rocket~ Stunning Dave In a message dated 11/2/2009 10:14:54 A.M. Central Standard Time, vft@aol.com writes: I bought the rebuilt one I changed out in N24ZM from Drakes. Nice folks. I remember being shocked at the then $600 cost until they told me what a new one went for. Seeing as the one in N24ZM didn't make the 500 hr inspection I did talk to TCM about warranty. The reply I got was that the failure was considered "normal". After a hung up the phone it was a few days before the pain wore off and I could sit again. Danny Melnik F1 N14ZM Rocket Factory Melbourne, FL -----Original Message----- From: FlyboyTR <flyboytr@bellsouth.net> Sent: Mon, Nov 2, 2009 8:11 am Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: IO240 alternator swap and coupler failure (mailto:flyboytr@bellsouth.net) > Quality Aircraft sent me a quote of $550. They get their rebuilt couplings from Drake Air (same company I purchased my "failed unit" from, 254 hours ago). I guess I will be ordering tomorrow. ...I feel so used! [Shocked] I am still perplexed how such a simple part cost so much. The current NEW pricing from TCM is $1,997.97. -------- Travis Rayner Mobile, AL Skystar Vixen, N-789DF Continental IO-240, Prince P-Tip Prop ADI-II Autopilot AnyWhereMap Navigation with weather Read this topic online here: _http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270560#270560_ (http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270560#270560) =================================== =_blank>www.aeroelectric.com m/" target=_blank>www.buildersbooks.com =_blank>www.homebuilthelp.com _blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution ==================================== target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List ==================================== tp://forums.matronics.com ==================================== (http://www.aeroelectric.com/) (http://www.buildersbooks.com/) (http://www.homebuilthelp.com/) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List)


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:43:43 AM PST US
    From: "verizon" <jareds@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed
    Not muffler heat but more likely resistance. Plugs were grounded when i tested. ----- Original Message ----- From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:45 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed > > swap the coils you have, and see if the issue follows the coils. > Hopefully it does and this is the cheap fix! Just swap the plugs coming > out of the engine and it will swap coils. > > As the stator is redundant, you should have a hot spark on one front, one > rear plug if there is an issue with the stator. To loose both front > plugs, then you would have to loose the same coils on the stator. Not a > very likely event. > > Did you try to turn the engine over with the plugs out and not grounded? > > Can you get a picture of the melted wires? I am assuming the heat came > from the exhaust and not from electrical heat. If there was enough > resistance in the wires to cause them to overheat and melt, you have > bigger issues. > > -------- > DO NOT ARCHIVE > Leonard Perry aka SNAKE > Soldotna AK > Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV > 582 IVO IFA > Full Lotus 1450 > #1 snake oil salesman since 1-22-2009 > > hander outer of humorless darwin awards > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270584#270584 > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:43:44 AM PST US
    From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt@jps.net>
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank
    Hmmmmm.....I was hoping that the vent line was partially obscured, like mine is, behind the root rib of the right wing. I can't see every inch of my clear vent line, but I know that it is straight downhill. Well, that shoots that theory all to hell! : ) I'm curious as to why the left tank feeds faster. From time to time my right tank will feed faster than the left, but not often. This may be due to me gawking out the left side of the plane, and banking to get a better view, which is what got me into a low-fuel/out-of-fuel predicament a few weeks ago. I have played (the first time wasn't playing!) with the un-porting of the tanks on several occasions...to the point of the low-fuel warning light coming on....and it is quite satisfying to (bank the plane, and) see the fuel flow into the clear filters, and up the clear vent line, making the low-fuel light go back off, and letting me know that I've got about 15 more minutes of flight left. But like you mentioned, a jet or two getting in the way of your carefully schemed plan will rattle your cage. : ) Lynn Matteson Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop Electroair direct-fire ignition system Rotec TBI-40 injection Status: flying (and learning) On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:27 AM, bjones@dmv.com wrote: > > Lynn, > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > Once on the ground, I can see the entire vent line run in my > application. > There is no fuel trapped in it in low spots and no low spots to > hold fuel. > So for fuel not to flow when I cover the fuel tank pickup with gas > Almost > seems to defy laws of physics as I understand them. > > I susspect low head pressure and marginal resistance from the inline > filter element that others have alluded to is at play. > > The left wing tank feeds faster so I generally put more gas in it > prior to > departure, consequently the left tank may not have unported in the > descents. I am tempted to try clear fuel lines on all runs from wing > tanks to header tank to see if fuel is caught in pockets on the > feed lines > and to see if fuel is still being drawn from the left wing tank. > > A couple of times when I have unported the right tank and stopped fuel > flow thru that inline filter, I have climbed to altitude over my local > airport (5,000' long) to see if I run the header tank dry while I > still > have fuel in both wings or whether fuel will start to flow again > when the > header tank gets low enough but due to heavy traffic with jet ops > mixed in > and being a bit nervous about it, I have not given this an nadequate > trial. > > BJ > N154K model IV > Rotax 912 > about 600 hours


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:15:41 AM PST US
    From: "verizon" <jareds@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed
    Just to clarify: Currently BOTH plugs are dull on front cylinder. If i swap the coils and it follows why do you say it is a cheap fix? What would be the issue in that case? So just swap the plastic plugs coming out of engine going to coils and if the dull fire is now on both plugs for rear cylinder then we know that it is what issue? ----- Original Message ----- From: "akflyer" <akflyer_2000@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:45 AM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Ducatti Ignition Coil Needed > > swap the coils you have, and see if the issue follows the coils. > Hopefully it does and this is the cheap fix! Just swap the plugs coming > out of the engine and it will swap coils. > > As the stator is redundant, you should have a hot spark on one front, one > rear plug if there is an issue with the stator. To loose both front > plugs, then you would have to loose the same coils on the stator. Not a > very likely event. > > Did you try to turn the engine over with the plugs out and not grounded? > > Can you get a picture of the melted wires? I am assuming the heat came > from the exhaust and not from electrical heat. If there was enough > resistance in the wires to cause them to overheat and melt, you have > bigger issues. > > -------- > DO NOT ARCHIVE > Leonard Perry aka SNAKE > Soldotna AK > Avid &quot;C&quot; / Mk IV > 582 IVO IFA > Full Lotus 1450 > #1 snake oil salesman since 1-22-2009 > > hander outer of humorless darwin awards > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270584#270584 > > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:17:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Leaky Header tank
    From: "DanM" <danm@powerdesignelectric.com>
    Problem fixed, installed a new Plated steel bushing (sharp threads) applied Permatex 9 AR Tack and Seal. Let it set a few days , no leaks to date. Thanks for all the responses. -------- Dan Mc Intyre Kitfox IV , Phase 1 Jabiru 2200 , 4.0 hours Sensenich 62x46 N443DM Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270625#270625


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:25:23 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank
    From: "n85ae" <n85ae@yahoo.com>
    Whichever tank has the header vent line run to it, will feed faster. It is just hydraulic head pressure which causes it, and unless you vent to both tanks there will always be a difference. Regards, Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270634#270634


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:55:47 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank
    From: bjones@dmv.com
    Lynn, My plane is unusually bare bones so a lot is exposed including the vent line. I mentioned the slower left side fuel flow just in case it triggered a thought about fuel restriction on that side, although I suspect the cxause is pilot technique and rigging. Its probably time to install a low fuel warning system. Thanks for mentioning it. BJ N154K I mentioned the right fuel useage in ncase it triggered a thought about <lynnmatt@jps.net> > > Hmmmmm.....I was hoping that the vent line was partially obscured, > like mine is, behind the root rib of the right wing. I can't see > every inch of my clear vent line, but I know that it is straight > downhill. Well, that shoots that theory all to hell! : ) > > I'm curious as to why the left tank feeds faster. From time to time > my right tank will feed faster than the left, but not often. This may > be due to me gawking out the left side of the plane, and banking to > get a better view, which is what got me into a low-fuel/out-of-fuel > predicament a few weeks ago. > > I have played (the first time wasn't playing!) with the un-porting of > the tanks on several occasions...to the point of the low-fuel warning > light coming on....and it is quite satisfying to (bank the plane, > and) see the fuel flow into the clear filters, and up the clear vent > line, making the low-fuel light go back off, and letting me know that > I've got about 15 more minutes of flight left. But like you > mentioned, a jet or two getting in the way of your carefully schemed > plan will rattle your cage. : ) > > > Lynn Matteson > Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger > Jabiru 2200, #2062, 805.4 hrs > Countdown to 1000 hrs--195 to go > Sensenich 62"x46" Wood prop > Electroair direct-fire ignition system > Rotec TBI-40 injection > Status: flying (and learning) > > > On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:27 AM, bjones@dmv.com wrote: > >> >> Lynn, >> >> Thanks for the suggestion. >> >> Once on the ground, I can see the entire vent line run in my >> application. >> There is no fuel trapped in it in low spots and no low spots to >> hold fuel. >> So for fuel not to flow when I cover the fuel tank pickup with gas >> Almost >> seems to defy laws of physics as I understand them. >> >> I susspect low head pressure and marginal resistance from the inline >> filter element that others have alluded to is at play. >> >> The left wing tank feeds faster so I generally put more gas in it >> prior to >> departure, consequently the left tank may not have unported in the >> descents. I am tempted to try clear fuel lines on all runs from wing >> tanks to header tank to see if fuel is caught in pockets on the >> feed lines >> and to see if fuel is still being drawn from the left wing tank. >> >> A couple of times when I have unported the right tank and stopped fuel >> flow thru that inline filter, I have climbed to altitude over my local >> airport (5,000' long) to see if I run the header tank dry while I >> still >> have fuel in both wings or whether fuel will start to flow again >> when the >> header tank gets low enough but due to heavy traffic with jet ops >> mixed in >> and being a bit nervous about it, I have not given this an nadequate >> trial. >> >> BJ >> N154K model IV >> Rotax 912 >> about 600 hours > >


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:55:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel flow stop after unport tank
    From: bjones@dmv.com
    Oddly my right tank which has the header tank to wing tank vent line draws fuel slower. BJ N154K > > Whichever tank has the header vent line run to it, will feed faster. It is > just hydraulic head pressure which causes it, and unless you vent to both > tanks there will always be a difference. > > Regards, > Jeff > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270634#270634 > >


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:05:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Leaky Header tank
    From: Patrick Reilly <patreilly43@gmail.com>
    Dan, Glad to hear Permatex worked for you. I finally looked at the sealer I used on the loose plastic header tank threads. It is Permatex 1BR fast drying fast setting. I'll find some of the 9 AR. I have another Permatex form a gasket soft setting product that I think should be used on gaskets. It doesn't seem to seal by it self. Pat Reilly Mod 3 582 Rebuild Rockford, IL On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:13 PM, DanM <danm@powerdesignelectric.com> wrote: > > Problem fixed, installed a new Plated steel bushing (sharp threads) applied > Permatex 9 AR Tack and Seal. Let it set a few days , no leaks to date. > Thanks for all the responses. > > -------- > Dan Mc Intyre > Kitfox IV , Phase 1 > Jabiru 2200 , 4.0 hours > Sensenich 62x46 > N443DM > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=270625#270625 > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --