Kitfox-List Digest Archive

Tue 02/15/11


Total Messages Posted: 10



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:08 AM - club plane ELSAs (Malcolm Brubaker)
     2. 08:11 AM - Re: club plane ELSAs (Guy Buchanan)
     3. 10:18 AM - Re: Gascolator (ronlee)
     4. 12:59 PM - Re: club plane ELSAs (Zimmermans)
     5. 01:27 PM - Re: Gascolator (Tommy Walker)
     6. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: Gascolator (Noel Loveys)
     7. 03:39 PM - Re: Re: Gascolator (Noel Loveys)
     8. 04:53 PM - Re: club plane ELSAs (Guy Buchanan)
     9. 06:07 PM - Re: club plane ELSAs (Malcolm Brubaker)
    10. 06:56 PM - Re: club plane ELSAs (Zimmermans)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:47 AM PST US
    From: Malcolm Brubaker <brubakermal@yahoo.com>
    Subject: club plane ELSAs
    There has been a lot of discussion, mostly positive, and it has all been =0Ainteresting, much of it very helpful. =0A=0AFrom the Sport Pilot Instruc tors forum Phil Dietro, Arlynn McMahon, and a few =0Aothers have discussed the options they have utilized. Thom Riddle has posted =0Asome inciteful qu estions and possible solutions. =0A=0AThis is what we are looking for : oth er "outside the box" forward thinking =0Agroups or individuals who can help us generate a solution to the growing problem =0Aof SPCFI shortages and th e costs involved in being able to operate. =0A=0AArlynn has offered to shar e info regarding how an SPCFI might go about =0A"affordably" operating with out the backing of a "regular" flight school. This is =0Anot a sarcastic st atement. =0A=0APhil mentioned the addition of PPC & WS training - are there existing LODAs in =0Aforce to provide for that training in ELSAs? =0A=0AHa ving come up through the ranks of Ultralight to Sport Pilot, I also know ma ny =0Anew UL flyers who are desperate for training they can't get. =0A=0AOu r focus is how to go about establishing an LLC and fractional ownership pla n =0Acentered around ELSA craft & EABs to use for the additional purpose of training =0ASP & UL student pilots; and making this information available to all SPCFIs. =0A=0AI have priced even the USED (aka- well flown) SLSAs, t here aren't many =0Aavailable, and they are still in the $70,000 to $100,00 0 range. =0A=0ANot exactly within the "affordable" range of even a school w ith more than 1 =0Ainstructor. =0A=0AThere has been response from the NAFI (National Association of Flight =0AInstructors) that has been on a positive note. They are very interested in =0Aworking on this solution as well. =0A =0AAs a group, Sport Pilot may simply need to do the same thing that other =0Aminorities have done in the past, Stand up, be counted, be recognized, a nd not =0Atake NO for an answer. It will take time. We all realize this. Bu t with more of =0Aus working toward the same goal, we will obtain it sooner rather than later.-=0A=0A-Malcolm Brubaker =0AMichigan Sport=0APilot R epair =0ALSRM-A, PPC, WS=0A(989)513-3022 =0A=0A=0A =0A_____________________ _______________________________________________________________=0ANo need t o miss a message. Get email on-the-go =0Awith Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get s tarted.=0Ahttp://mobile.yahoo.com/mail


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:11:58 AM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <gebuchanan@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: club plane ELSAs
    On 2/15/2011 6:06 AM, Malcolm Brubaker wrote: > This is what we are looking for : other "outside the box" forward > thinking groups or individuals who can help us generate a solution to > the growing problem of SPCFI shortages and the costs involved in being > able to operate. I don't know how outside the box this is, but the following comes to mind: * In San Diego most flying is done within clubs, where investors and/or members own the planes and lease them back. Rates run $91 for a Sting Sport, not really what you'd call affordable, but way cheaper than renting a 172. ($135) * What the world needs is the $20-$50k LSA they were promised. If I remember correctly the Rotax 582 is ASTM certified just like the 912. I also seem to remember that it's about $12k cheaper. An airframe designed specifically for the 582, and specifically for dual training should be able to be made very inexpensively. Think a lightened Coyote S-6ES with dacron sails. Having flown behind the 582 for years I think it a wonderful engine perfectly suited for training. You handle the EGT issue with training and an EIS with a BIG RED WARNING LIGHT. The idea is not to buy one of these things, or even a few, but to get investors interested and try to build 100. Similar things have been done in the past in yachting. * I've often wondered if the yacht club or sailing club model couldn't be applied to aircraft. Most of us get involved in flying for the social part of it, yet the only place to socialize is within someone's hangar or at a wretched restaurant somewhere. Why not build a hangar/club facility where people would gather / hang / eat / drink and socialize. You could tie it to a flying club with rental aircraft or just as a stand-alone within the airport. Either way it would be the "place to be", a wonderful enticement for new flyers, and a way to reduce that 80% flight training drop-out rate AOPA keeps talking about. Guy Buchanan Ramona, CA Kitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and grounded


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:18:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gascolator
    From: "ronlee" <rlee468@comcast.net>
    My experience with outboard boat engines has proved that a leak before the fuel pump will cause an engine stoppage in short order. If you are pulling fuel from a tank on the bottom of a boat a very small leak in the line will suck in air and the engine will starve for fuel. Believe me the leak does not have to be very big either. Anything that will cause a slight vacuum on the suction side of your fuel pump is a prescription for engine stoppage should any leak develop. I agree we fly experimental and can do anything we wish. Some techniques though are better followed that have a proven track record..... -------- Ron Lee Tucson, Arizona Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331137#331137


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:59:05 PM PST US
    From: "Zimmermans" <jezim@pro-ns.net>
    Subject: Re: club plane ELSAs
    When I went to Light Sport I sold my Cessna & bought a 7AC Champ. It is a legal LS plane plus it is an antique. They are there for $25,000 on up. We have several in this area that are club owned. I will never live long enough to see a new LS that I consider affordable. My 2 cents worth. Jim Lake Elmo MN Series 5 under construction 0-200 powered ----- On 2/15/2011 6:06 AM, Malcolm Brubaker wrote: This is what we are looking for : other "outside the box" forward thinking groups or individuals who can help us generate a solution to the growing problem of SPCFI shortages and the costs involved in being able to operate. I don't know how outside the box this is, but the following comes to mind: a.. In San Diego most flying is done within clubs, where investors and/or members own the planes and lease them back. Rates run $91 for a Sting Sport, not really what you'd call affordable, but way cheaper than renting a 172. ($135) b.. What the world needs is the $20-$50k LSA they were promised. If I remember correctly the Rotax 582 is ASTM certified just like the 912. I also seem to remember that it's about $12k cheaper. An airframe designed specifically for the 582, and specifically for dual training should be able to be made very inexpensively. Think a lightened Coyote S-6ES with dacron sails. Having flown behind the 582 for years I think it a wonderful engine perfectly suited for training. You handle the EGT issue with training and an EIS with a BIG RED WARNING LIGHT. The idea is not to buy one of these things, or even a few, but to get investors interested and try to build 100. Similar things have been done in the past in yachting. c.. I've often wondered if the yacht club or sailing club model couldn't be applied to aircraft. Most of us get involved in flying for the social part of it, yet the only place to socialize is within someone's hangar or at a wretched restaurant somewhere. Why not build a hangar/club facility where people would gather / hang / eat / drink and socialize. You could tie it to a flying club with rental aircraft or just as a stand-alone within the airport. Either way it would be the "place to be", a wonderful enticement for new flyers, and a way to reduce that 80% flight training drop-out rate AOPA keeps talking about. Guy Buchanan Ramona, CA Kitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and grounded


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:27:52 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gascolator
    From: "Tommy Walker" <twalker@cableone.net>
    Ronlee I agree with you. All car manufacturers, as far as I know, have moved the fuel pump to the gas tank now. I believe it is because it is better to push fuel than it is to suck it. Remember when the fuel pump was driven by an engine mounted mechanical pump? There was an excellent topic on this in the Matronics Zenith list several years ago. One of the things mentioned to prove this was, take two straws, place one in a glass of water and the other outside the glass. Put both straws in your mouth and suck.... Guess which one has the least amount of friction? So, it seems that pushing, instead of sucking, is the best method for moving fuel through a line. I don't have the exact quote on this example, but I could probably find it if anyone is interested. -------- Tommy Walker N8701 - Anniston, AL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331159#331159


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:39:26 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Re: Gascolator
    Having the pump in the tank to push the fuel is a great idea but there is another reason. The gas is also a great cooling device for the pump. That means the pumps last longer and works more efficiently. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tommy Walker Sent: February 15, 2011 5:55 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Gascolator Ronlee I agree with you. All car manufacturers, as far as I know, have moved the fuel pump to the gas tank now. I believe it is because it is better to push fuel than it is to suck it. Remember when the fuel pump was driven by an engine mounted mechanical pump? There was an excellent topic on this in the Matronics Zenith list several years ago. One of the things mentioned to prove this was, take two straws, place one in a glass of water and the other outside the glass. Put both straws in your mouth and suck.... Guess which one has the least amount of friction? So, it seems that pushing, instead of sucking, is the best method for moving fuel through a line. I don't have the exact quote on this example, but I could probably find it if anyone is interested. -------- Tommy Walker N8701 - Anniston, AL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331159#331159


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:39:27 PM PST US
    From: "Noel Loveys" <noelloveys@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Re: Gascolator
    I forgot to say that some of those pumps attain 60 psi pressure on the line to feed EFI systems and they have no filters between them and the gas... only a screen to keep the lumps out. As an added feature the pumps usually are integrated with the tank float for the fuel gauge. I've yet to hear of a tank exploding because of the pump. Noel -----Original Message----- From: owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tommy Walker Sent: February 15, 2011 5:55 PM Subject: Kitfox-List: Re: Gascolator Ronlee I agree with you. All car manufacturers, as far as I know, have moved the fuel pump to the gas tank now. I believe it is because it is better to push fuel than it is to suck it. Remember when the fuel pump was driven by an engine mounted mechanical pump? There was an excellent topic on this in the Matronics Zenith list several years ago. One of the things mentioned to prove this was, take two straws, place one in a glass of water and the other outside the glass. Put both straws in your mouth and suck.... Guess which one has the least amount of friction? So, it seems that pushing, instead of sucking, is the best method for moving fuel through a line. I don't have the exact quote on this example, but I could probably find it if anyone is interested. -------- Tommy Walker N8701 - Anniston, AL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331159#331159


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:50 PM PST US
    From: Guy Buchanan <gebuchanan@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: club plane ELSAs
    On 2/15/2011 10:16 AM, Zimmermans wrote: > When I went to Light Sport I sold my Cessna & bought a 7AC Champ. It > is a legal LS plane plus it is an antique. They are there for $25,000 > on up. We have several in this area that are club owned. I will never > live long enough to see a new LS that I consider affordable. My 2 > cents worth. Good idea Jim. SportAviation had a recent article on a bunch of cheap certificated LSAs: Chiefs, Champs, Luscombs, Ercoupes, Cessna 120/140, PA 15/17, Taylorcraft BC-12. All these were claimed to be below $40k and many were below $30k. Don't know if they'd be insurable for flight instruction, though. *_Guy Buchanan_* Scoutmaster -- Troop 680 760.809.6145 scoutmaster@troop680.org <mailto:scoutmaster@troop680.org> www.troop680.org


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:07:16 PM PST US
    From: Malcolm Brubaker <brubakermal@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: club plane ELSAs
    --- Jim can- i please talk with one of thos club plane owners?- - we need a =0Atemplit-so we can make it easer for people to start club s and-teach people to =0Afly?--- mal-- call any time =0A=0A-M alcolm Brubaker =0AMichigan Sport=0APilot Repair =0ALSRM-A, PPC, WS=0A(989) 513-3022 =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Zimmermans <jezim@pro-ns.net>=0ATo: kitfox-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Tue, February 1 5, 2011 1:16:34 PM=0ASubject: Re: Kitfox-List: club plane ELSAs=0A=0A=0AWhe n I went to Light Sport I sold my Cessna & bought a 7AC Champ. It is a lega l =0ALS plane plus it is an antique. They are there for $25,000 on up. We h ave =0Aseveral in this area that are club owned. I will never live long eno ugh to see a =0Anew LS that I consider affordable. My 2 cents worth.=0AJim =0ALake Elmo MN=0ASeries 5 under construction=0A0-200 powered=0A----- =0A> =0A>On 2/15/2011 6:06 AM, Malcolm Brubaker wrote: =0A>This is what we are l ooking for : other "outside the box" forward thinking =0A>groups or individ uals who can help us generate a solution to the growing problem =0A>of SPCF I shortages and the costs involved in being able to operate. =0A>=0AI don't know how outside the box this is, but the following comes to mind:=0A=0A * In San Diego most flying is done within clubs, where investors and/or members =0Aown the planes and lease them back. Rates run $91 for a Sting Sp ort, not really =0Awhat you'd call affordable, but way cheaper than renting a 172. ($135) =0A=0A* What the world needs is the $20-$50k LSA they wer e promised. If I remember =0Acorrectly the Rotax 582 is ASTM certified just like the 912. I also seem to =0Aremember that it's about $12k cheaper. An airframe designed specifically for the =0A582, and specifically for dual tr aining should be able to be made very =0Ainexpensively. Think a lightened C oyote S-6ES with dacron sails. Having flown =0Abehind the 582 for years I t hink it a wonderful engine perfectly suited for =0Atraining. You handle the EGT issue with training and an EIS with a BIG RED =0AWARNING LIGHT. The id ea is not to buy one of these things, or even a few, but to =0Aget investor s interested and try to build 100. Similar things have been done in =0Athe past in yachting. =0A=0A* I've often wondered if the yacht club or saili ng club model couldn't be =0Aapplied to aircraft. Most of us get involved i n flying for the social part of =0Ait, yet the only place to socialize is w ithin someone's hangar or at a wretched =0Arestaurant somewhere. Why not bu ild a hangar/club facility where people would =0Agather / hang / eat / drin k and socialize. You could tie it to a flying club =0Awith rental aircraft or just as a stand-alone within the airport. Either way it =0Awould be the "place to be", a wonderful enticement for new flyers, and a way to =0Areduc e that 80% flight training drop-out rate AOPA keeps talking about. Guy =0AB uchanan=0ARamona, CA=0AKitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and gro unded=0A=0A=0A=0A =0Ahref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-Lis t">http://www.matronhref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matr onics.com=0A href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matr =================== =0A=0A=0A=0A


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:56:03 PM PST US
    From: "Zimmermans" <jezim@pro-ns.net>
    Subject: Re: club plane ELSAs
    I don't personally know them. They are a group of people on our field that were already pilots and bought a plane to share. They don't give instruction or rent it out. ----- Original Message ----- From: Malcolm Brubaker To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 8:02 Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: club plane ELSAs Jim can i please talk with one of thos club plane owners? we need a templit so we can make it easer for people to start clubs and teach people to fly? mal call any time Malcolm Brubaker Michigan Sport Pilot Repair LSRM-A, PPC, WS (989)513-3022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- From: Zimmermans <jezim@pro-ns.net> To: kitfox-list@matronics.com Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011 1:16:34 PM Subject: Re: Kitfox-List: club plane ELSAs When I went to Light Sport I sold my Cessna & bought a 7AC Champ. It is a legal LS plane plus it is an antique. They are there for $25,000 on up. We have several in this area that are club owned. I will never live long enough to see a new LS that I consider affordable. My 2 cents worth. Jim Lake Elmo MN Series 5 under construction 0-200 powered ----- On 2/15/2011 6:06 AM, Malcolm Brubaker wrote: This is what we are looking for : other "outside the box" forward thinking groups or individuals who can help us generate a solution to the growing problem of SPCFI shortages and the costs involved in being able to operate. I don't know how outside the box this is, but the following comes to mind: a.. In San Diego most flying is done within clubs, where investors and/or members own the planes and lease them back. Rates run $91 for a Sting Sport, not really what you'd call affordable, but way cheaper than renting a 172. ($135) b.. What the world needs is the $20-$50k LSA they were promised. If I remember correctly the Rotax 582 is ASTM certified just like the 912. I also seem to remember that it's about $12k cheaper. An airframe designed specifically for the 582, and specifically for dual training should be able to be made very inexpensively. Think a lightened Coyote S-6ES with dacron sails. Having flown behind the 582 for years I think it a wonderful engine perfectly suited for training. You handle the EGT issue with training and an EIS with a BIG RED WARNING LIGHT. The idea is not to buy one of these things, or even a few, but to get investors interested and try to build 100. Similar things have been done in the past in yachting. c.. I've often wondered if the yacht club or sailing club model couldn't be applied to aircraft. Most of us get involved in flying for the social part of it, yet the only place to socialize is within someone's hangar or at a wretched restaurant somewhere. Why not build a hangar/club facility where people would gather / hang / eat / drink and socialize. You could tie it to a flying club with rental aircraft or just as a stand-alone within the airport. Either way it would be the "place to be", a wonderful enticement for new flyers, and a way to reduce that 80% flight training drop-out rate AOPA keeps talking about. Guy Buchanan Ramona, CA Kitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and grounded href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List">http://www.matron href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c http://www.mat="http://forums.matronics.com/" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://for========




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kitfox-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kitfox-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kitfox-list
  • Browse Kitfox-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kitfox-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --