Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:12 PM - Re: Auto oil filter for 912? (Roger Lee)
     2. 10:55 PM - Fw: Kolb-List: club planes? (Malcolm Brubaker)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Auto oil filter for 912? | 
      
      
      The answer to your question is in the document posted by Tommy above.
      
      --------
      Roger Lee
      Tucson, Az.
      Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated
      Rotax Repair Center
      Home 520-574-1080  TRY HOME FIRST
      Cell 520-349-7056
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=332178#332178
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Fw: Kolb-List: club planes? | 
      
      just a bit of history=0A-Malcolm Brubaker =0AMichigan Sport=0APilot Repai
      r =0ALSRM-A, PPC, WS=0A(989)513-3022 =0A=0A=0A=0A----- Forwarded Message --
      --=0AFrom: "Ron @ KFHU" <captainron1@cox.net>=0ATo: kolb-list@matronics.com
      =0ASent: Sun, February 6, 2011 11:28:57 AM=0ASubject: Re: Kolb-List: club p
      lanes?=0A=0A--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ron- @- KFHU" <captainron
      1@cox.net>=0A=0A=0AWell that's a good idea. Could certainly use it (My M3X)
       here in KFHU, it may =0Aeven motivate me more to finish my project faster,
       which is 90% complete with =0A100% left to do kinda thing.=0AHowever ignor
      ing the FAA in this equation is pretty much kicking the can down =0Athe roa
      d. I think in terms of movement there has to be a wide ranging =0Arecogniti
      on the the FAA is the problem in general aviation. Fearing the FAA or =0Ath
      inking in terms of compliance with FAA all the time as we do now is strangl
      ing =0Aaviation. If there is no concerted effort to truncate their pervasiv
      e intrusion =0Ainto aviation; the contraction will continue.=0AI think I me
      ntioned before that I almost never see young kids around taking =0Aflying l
      essons anymore. Its not because aviation has stopped firing up the =0Aimagi
      nation of the younger generation, its because the fun the freedom and the 
      =0Ajoy have been stomped out of flying by the FAA to an alarming degree. By
       all =0Arights the Kolb factory should be busy and backlogged for orders, y
      et it is not =0Ahappening. So the idea of a club to circumvent FAA rules is
       a valid and good, =0Abut it will not reverse the difficulty of being an ai
      rcraft owner aviator. The =0Afuture is as it has always been in people owni
      ng their aircraft and plying the =0Askies in freedom. I have yet to see an 
      organization come about that makes it as =0Aits prime objective to restore 
      freedom to aviate, by going after the source of =0Athe constraints. That is
       what we need most of all right now.=0A=0A=0A=0A---- Malcolm Brubaker <brub
      akermal@yahoo.com> wrote: =0A=0A==============0AW
      e had an interesting- discussion on linkedin this-weekend.-All about
      -flight =0Ainstruction and the idea of turning an experimental into a clu
      b plane so an =0Ainstructor could legally-use it to-teach-the owners
      - to fly.-- This theory is =0Aviable and there is-FAA approval to d
      o this.- =0A=0AWhat-I think would really jump start the process is a pr
      e-developed general =0Aformat.--One that would be easy for-people to 
      follow- in developing their =0Aown-club and fractional ownership;--
      not much different than the downloads a =0Aperson can buy to write their ow
      n will or start a non profit 401c3 corporation. =0AThese always contain sev
      eral disclaimers and liability waivers just like the =0Aones we used in the
       old days to teach ultralight flying.- =0A=0AThis would help the ultralig
      ht pilot and sport pilot want-to-be, as well as the =0Ainstructor. =0A=0ATh
      e idea of teaching someone to fly in a $14,000 plane with a 582 is not that
       =0Afar fetched. We all know people that-have.- It seemes like a better
       option than =0Athe $60,000 to $100,000 planes everyone thinks they current
      ly need .-When =0Aa-student-becomes a licensed pilot-they can trans
      ition up.- =0A=0AWhat this sport needs now is for people to stop focusing
       on the problem and =0Adevelope a solution.- The ultralight trainer was s
      o successful that it was =0Aturned into a sport pilot plane; and that took 
      20 years.----Even a 2 place Kolb =0Aclassic could qualify.=0A-Mal
      colm Brubaker =0AMichigan Sport=0APilot Repair =0ALSRM-A, PPC, WS=0A(989)51
      3-3022 =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Pat Ladd <pj
      .ladd@btinternet.com>=0ATo: kolb-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Sat, February 5
      , 2011 10:45:06 AM=0ASubject: Re: Kolb-List: Kolb list: Pitot probe=0A=0A
      =0AHi Mike,=0A<<-I added my own extension>>=0A=0ANice neat job.=0A-=0AP
      ==============- =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A--=0Akugelair.
      =================0A=0A=0A      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |