Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:14 AM - Re: Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? (Sacha)
2. 06:28 AM - Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? (Tom Jones)
3. 02:15 PM - Re: Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? (Sacha)
4. 06:11 PM - Firewall width (Michael Kraus)
5. 09:42 PM - Re: Firewall width (Lowell Fitt)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? |
Tom
Thanks for that. It makes sense that (in the new post 2003 setup) if the first
8 degrees are dedicated to the spoiler region, then the flaperon angle with the
flap lever full forward should be 19.5 instead of 11.5.
I went and checked my setup today and the flaperon angle seems about 5 degrees
*above* the horizontal instead of 11.5 degrees below. I'll have to find a proper
digital level to take precision measurements and make the appropriate adjustments.
I still haven't heard back from Kitfox about my enquiry to purchase a manual.
Regards
Sacha
On Jun 15, 2013, at 15:47, "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net> wrote:
>
> My assembly manual from 1994 says 11.4 degrees.
>
> Dave's files are from the later manual version...2003 I think...when they included
rigging "reflex" or "negative" flap setting to act as a spoiler. this may
account for the difference in the instructions. I'll have to do some deep
thinking on this.
>
> Anyone else know for sure?
>
> Mine is set at 11.4 degrees and flys straight and level hands off with no roll
problems when flaps deployed.
>
> --------
> Tom Jones
> Classic IV
> 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
> Ellensburg, WA
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=402731#402731
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? |
> I still haven't heard back from Kitfox about my enquiry to purchase a manual.
> Regards
> Sacha
I haven't ordered anything lately but when I do I call and leave a message. They
always called me back pretty soon afterwards.
--------
Tom Jones
Classic IV
503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
Ellensburg, WA
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=402784#402784
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: flap angles, Kitfox IV - 11.5 or 19.5 degrees?? |
Being in Europe I generally prefer email but I'll try calling them this week.
On Jun 16, 2013, at 15:28, "Tom Jones" <nahsikhs@elltel.net> wrote:
>
>
>> I still haven't heard back from Kitfox about my enquiry to purchase a manual.
>> Regards
>> Sacha
>
>
> I haven't ordered anything lately but when I do I call and leave a message.
They always called me back pretty soon afterwards.
>
> --------
> Tom Jones
> Classic IV
> 503 Rotax, 72 inch Two blade Warp
> Ellensburg, WA
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=402784#402784
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I'm building a SS7 and was wondering if others had to trim the firewall widt
h? Mine seems about 3/8" too wide on both sides as compared to the sides of
the tube fuselage and in compared to the stainless steel lower firewall pie
ce (the part that goes along the lower edge and below the fuse).....
Picture attached
Thanks
-Mike Kraus
Sent from my iPhone
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Firewall width |
Mike,
My experience is with model IVs. With the IV the firewall is custom fit to
the cowling so it is sent by the factory oversized. It is essentially cut
to fit the cowl. I found that one of the more challenging parts of the
whole construction process. Not being that familiar with the 7, the above
might not hold, but I would suggest not cutting until you are sure how it
will eventually fit the cowl.
Lowell
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michael Kraus" <n223rv@wolflakeairport.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 6:10 PM
Subject: Kitfox-List: Firewall width
> I'm building a SS7 and was wondering if others had to trim the firewall
> width? Mine seems about 3/8" too wide on both sides as compared to the
> sides of the tube fuselage and in compared to the stainless steel lower
> firewall piece (the part that goes along the lower edge and below the
> fuse).....
>
> Picture attached
>
> Thanks
> -Mike Kraus
> Sent from my iPhone
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|