Kolb-List Digest Archive

Wed 07/09/03


Total Messages Posted: 11



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:27 AM - Re: Kolbs are Different (Dave Rains)
     2. 04:59 AM - Re: smaller ailerons on firefly (Ted Cowan)
     3. 05:42 AM - Re: Re: smaller ailerons on firefly (possums)
     4. 06:27 AM - Re: Mobil 1 (Hans vanAlphen)
     5. 06:58 AM - Re: Re: Mobil 1 (John Hauck)
     6. 07:18 AM - Re: Re: Mobil 1 (ul15rhb@juno.com)
     7. 08:43 AM - Re: Aero-News Network (Vince Hallam)
     8. 11:55 AM - Firefly review (Wayne F.Wilson)
     9. 12:53 PM - Firefly review (John Hauck)
    10. 06:23 PM - Re: Prop Clearance (T. K. Frantz)
    11. 06:33 PM - Re: Fire Fly Ailerons (jerb)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:27:45 AM PST US
    From: Dave Rains <rr@htg.net>
    Subject: Kolbs are Different
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Dave Rains <rr@htg.net> Seems to me we were doing that at gross in my spam can. Dave Rains, I've got to build another Kolb! do not archive -----Original Message----- From: Kirby Dennis Contr ASC/TM [SMTP:Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil] Subject: Kolb-List: Kolbs are Different I was humbled, and honored. Although I'm *only* seeing 700 fpm climb rate, that must be lots more than the Pipers and Cessnas are doing out here at this 6200 foot elevation airport, and the locals must notice. That made my day!


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:59:31 AM PST US
    From: Ted Cowan <tcowan1917@direcway.com>
    Subject: Re: smaller ailerons on firefly
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Ted Cowan <tcowan1917@direcway.com> Okay, the jury is in on the firefly with smaller ails. Has anybody tried to put smaller ones on the original firestar? I mean, they are great big gaping ails. I would think they would work better with reversed taper, with the larger part on the wing tip rather than inside. I have considered changing mine to the type on the Firestar II, short with no flap. Anyone have any experience there? Thanks. Ted C.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:42:40 AM PST US
    From: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: smaller ailerons on firefly
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com> At 06:55 AM 7/9/2003 -0500, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: Ted Cowan <tcowan1917@direcway.com> > >Okay, the jury is in on the firefly with smaller ails. Has anybody tried to >put smaller ones on the original firestar? I mean, they are great big >gaping ails. I would think they would work better with reversed taper, with >the larger part on the wing tip rather than inside. I have considered >changing mine to the type on the Firestar II, short with no flap. Anyone >have any experience there? Thanks. Ted C. Mine are at least 2 inches narrower (I can't remember exactly)and tapered toward the wing tip - no flaps. I don't think you need all that aileron. Takes all that heavy feel out of the stick and turns a lot better. Had the old "barn door" ailerons on my Firestar XP. Would really give your arm a work out at higher speeds. http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/ailermod.jpg http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Xhingestrailingedge.jpg


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:03 AM PST US
    From: "Hans vanAlphen" <hva@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Mobil 1
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Hans vanAlphen" <hva@bellsouth.net> > > Jeremy/All: > > Thanks for the info. > > I too use MOBIL I full sythetic, 15W50. Used it > in both the 912 and 912S. Have gotten good > service from it. > > john h > John and Jeremy, The Mobil 1 you use is it the automotive kind or the Motorcycle oil ? There seem to be additional ZDDP anti-wear additives in the newly formulated motorcycle oil as described on Mobil 1 website ? Go to FAQ on : www.mobil1.com/motorcycle/index.jsp The Mobil 1 - VTwin 20w50 seems ideal ? It seems that the ZDDP anti-wear additives in the automotive oils have been reduced to meet emission standards and the high phosphorous content can harm late model catalytic converters, which we do not have. Castrol GTX used to be loaded with ZDDP's, but not anymore. Hans van Alphen Mark III Xtra BMW powered 102 hours.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:58:53 AM PST US
    From: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Mobil 1
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> > The Mobil 1 you use is it the automotive kind or the Motorcycle oil ? > There seem to be additional ZDDP anti-wear additives in the newly formulated > motorcycle oil as described on Mobil 1 website ? > Hans van Alphen Han/Gang: I use automotive Mobil I full synthetic, 15W50. Have had good results and it costs much less than what I can buy the motorcycle Mobil I oil. I did buy two quarts of Mobil I syn motorcycle oil at Auto Zone for my Suzuki water cooled 400cc thumper. Couldn't tell if there was an improvement over Shell Rotella Full Synthetic, 5W40. By the time I got out the door the tab was nearly $18.00. Generally, Wal*Mart has Mobil I full sythetic 15W50 in gal jugs for about $18.00. I change the oil in my 912S much more than called for in the Service Manual, primarily because I end up burning a lot of 100LL. Rotax says the 912 series engines do not like the lead in 100LL. I also use Alcor TCP when using 100LL. At 400 hours my gear box was removed. Gears and components showed no sign of wear. The 912 went 1,135 hours and never had the gear box removed, but was running strong when I pulled the engine off the MK III. Take care, john h


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:49 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Mobil 1
    From: ul15rhb@juno.com
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: ul15rhb@juno.com I always use Mobil 1 75w-90 synthetic gear oil in my 447 gearbox. It runs cooler and always drains clear every year when I change it. Ralph Burlingame Original Firestar, Rotax 447 --- John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> > The Mobil 1 you use is it the automotive kind or the Motorcycle oil ? > There seem to be additional ZDDP anti-wear additives in the newly formulated > motorcycle oil as described on Mobil 1 website ? > Hans van Alphen Han/Gang: I use automotive Mobil I full synthetic, 15W50. Have had good results and it costs much less than what I can buy the motorcycle Mobil I oil. I did buy two quarts of Mobil I syn motorcycle oil at Auto Zone for my Suzuki water cooled 400cc thumper. Couldn't tell if there was an improvement over Shell Rotella Full Synthetic, 5W40. By the time I got out the door the tab was nearly $18.00. Generally, Wal*Mart has Mobil I full sythetic 15W50 in gal jugs for about $18.00. I change the oil in my 912S much more than called for in the Service Manual, primarily because I end up burning a lot of 100LL. Rotax says the 912 series engines do not like the lead in 100LL. I also use Alcor TCP when using 100LL. At 400 hours my gear box was removed. Gears and components showed no sign of wear. The 912 went 1,135 hours and never had the gear box removed, but was running strong when I pulled the engine off the MK III. Take care, john h The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:43:24 AM PST US
    From: "Vince Hallam" <vincehallam@devonwindmills.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Aero-News Network
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Vince Hallam" <vincehallam@devonwindmills.co.uk> Dont foget we brits dnt claimit all there was aders avion in france around 1898 I think but Cayleys was not powered,BTW there was another Cayley replica flew the same place about 15-20 years ago flown by Pigot?? It han the original control mechanism not like Bransons.. Cayleys system was a very long tiller off the back of the fuselage "boat" with a cruciform tail on the end of it.. I think there is a New Zealanders claim to a first powered flight about 1900 somewhere in the mill and I have a very rare photo of a guy called LaVezzari flying a rogallo type glider in 1903 over northern France Then there was a guy called Homer who...... Vnz On 7 Jul 2003 at 19:31, Bob Bean wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: Bob Bean <slyck@frontiernet.net> Ultrastar owners, check this out. 1853? looks sorta familiardoesn't it? do not archive http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=2dd0aeb5- 4f53-4a49-a 67b-454929008172& <http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=2dd0aeb5- 4f53-4a49- a67b-454929008172&> _- ================================================== ================== advertising on the Matronics Forums. _- ================================================== ================== view List members. _- ================================================== ================== http://www.matronics.com/contribution _- ================================================== ================== ==


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:55:38 AM PST US
    From: "Wayne F.Wilson" <wfwilson1@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Firefly review
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Wayne F.Wilson" <wfwilson1@yahoo.ca> Does anyone know where to find on the internet pilot reviews for Kolb Firefly? UL Magazine has the books you can order but I only want the one test. Thanks Wayne F Wilson


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:53:18 PM PST US
    From: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Firefly review
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> > Does anyone know where to find on the internet pilot > reviews for Kolb Firefly? > Wayne F Wilson Wayne/all: Have you tried the folks that build the kits? The New Kolb Aircraft Company? Or.........., how about the pilots on this List that built, own, and fly Kolb Fire Fly's. I can guarantee you, they know a lot more about the Fire Fly than Dan Johnson will ever dream about. He is the guy that has been doing the UL Flying aircraft tests since I have been on board, for 20 years now. Trouble is, he only gets to spend a couple hours, if that much, with the aircraft he gets to fly. john h


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:23:09 PM PST US
    From: "T. K. Frantz" <tkrolfe@usadatanet.net>
    Subject: Re: Prop Clearance
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "T. K. Frantz" <tkrolfe@usadatanet.net> DAquaNut@aol.com wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com > > > Larry / Terry, > > You were both right. I built a fixture to hold my ailerons vertical . I > thought of that last night when I went to the garage to see how the lord > mounts were installed. Looks like I have no choice but to fold the ailerons down. > Looks like my 66" 2-blade ivo comes frighteningly close to the tail boom. > How much clearance do you all have? > > Ed (in Houston) > > PS Im REALLY starting to identify > with (98% finnished 50% to go) > Ive thought I was nearly finnished > for about a year now. > > Do not archive > Ed, Not to worry! I swing a 66 inch wooden prop also. If the prop hits the tail boom, something else has seriously failed and you have much more to worry about than the clearance. Go fly and enjoy!!! Terry - FireFly # 95


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:33:38 PM PST US
    From: jerb <ulflyer@airmail.net>
    Subject: Re: Fire Fly Ailerons
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer@airmail.net> Steve, What benefit are you actually experiencing with the aileron mod. I can wag my wing as it now. You say it is a completely different aircraft but don't elaborate on it. Help us out here. jerb At 09:23 PM 7/8/03 -0400, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: "stephen e. spence" <sspence@tm.net> > >To all the Fire Fly owners on the list that still have oversize (15" or >larger) ailerons, I strongly encourage you to go smaller. After chatting >with Jack Hart about the ailerons, I recently changed my 17" ailerons to >11". What a delightful difference! I can actually "wag" my wings >now. It is a completely different aircraft. I did not want to miss any >flying this summer, so I arranged with Brian Melborn (formerly of Lite >Speed) to fabricate a new pair. Brian got them done and shipped in less >than two weeks. They looked great, better than the rest of the >plane. Only missed one day of flying. I no longer need any aileron >trim. Can't wait to fly again! > >Steve Spence FF013, building Mk3-X >Auburn Hills, MI > >do not archive > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --