Kolb-List Digest Archive

Tue 06/07/05


Total Messages Posted: 32



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:29 AM - Re: D-Day (PATRICK LADD)
     2. 04:10 AM - Ultrastar crash (Edward Steuber)
     3. 04:49 AM - Re: Trailering a Kolb (PATRICK LADD)
     4. 04:52 AM - Re: D-Day (Pollus)
     5. 05:21 AM - UV Block (John Hauck)
     6. 05:37 AM - Re: UV Block (robert bean)
     7. 05:55 AM - Re: D-Day (Kirk Smith)
     8. 06:58 AM - Re: MKIII Flight to MV and Beyond (still continuing) (Larry Bourne)
     9. 07:05 AM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (DAquaNut@aol.com)
    10. 08:14 AM - More MV Photos (John Jung)
    11. 08:29 AM - Firestar aerodynamics (John Jung)
    12. 10:12 AM - Re: More MV Photos (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
    13. 10:38 AM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (Jack & Louise Hart)
    14. 10:42 AM - Re: 1st Fly (Jack & Louise Hart)
    15. 12:18 PM - Re: MKIII Flight to MV and Beyond (still continuing) (George T. Alexander, Jr.)
    16. 01:24 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (Richard Pike)
    17. 01:35 PM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (Richard Pike)
    18. 02:54 PM - Re: Trailering a Kolb (Silver Fern Microlights Ltd)
    19. 04:12 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (Eugene Zimmerman)
    20. 04:51 PM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (nmatthew)
    21. 06:30 PM - Windscreen  (John Jung)
    22. 06:30 PM - Re: Trailering a Kolb (woody)
    23. 06:30 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (woody)
    24. 06:40 PM - reason for ultra star crash (WADE LAWICKI)
    25. 06:56 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (Larry Bourne)
    26. 06:59 PM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (Beauford)
    27. 07:29 PM - Re: reason for ultra star crash (ray anderson)
    28. 07:43 PM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (DAquaNut@aol.com)
    29. 08:42 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (WhiskeyVictor36@aol.com)
    30. 11:04 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (possums)
    31. 11:11 PM - Re: Firestar aerodynamics (possums)
    32. 11:14 PM - Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio (possums)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:29:30 AM PST US
    From: "PATRICK LADD" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: D-Day
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "PATRICK LADD" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> I salute you brave men of my Father's generation that hit the the beaches>> It s nice to have an all inclusive group, `fathers generation`, which can include Dutch, Norwegian, Polish, British, French, Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, Indians etc., According to Hollywood there were only Americans on the beaches. No, I apologise. The Brits did get a mention in `The Longest Day`. About 25 seconds on screen, just before the Americans dropped on St Mere Eglise and wrapped up the campaign. I wish that we had a film industry. Then WE would have won the war. Cheers Pat do not archive --


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:10:52 AM PST US
    From: "Edward Steuber" <esteuber@rochester.rr.com>
    Subject: Ultrastar crash
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Edward Steuber" <esteuber@rochester.rr.com> I'm with you , BB ! Sounds like pilot error. Especially with the trike experience. Had a chance to fly one a couple years back and with control inputs reversed , my brain would not allow me to fly it "BACKWARDS". Old Dog...New Tricks ? do not archive Ed in Western NY


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:49:05 AM PST US
    From: "PATRICK LADD" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Trailering a Kolb
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "PATRICK LADD" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> unserviceable condition by getting dings and dimples from mishandling while trailering. >> Thanks for your comments John. I see your point. Superb Pics. WOW. Thanks again. weight problems with my Xtra. The white paint on the cage fabric allows the sunlight to shine through. Needs several more coats to become opaque but I cannot afford the extra weight. guess I shall just have to put up with it. Cheers Pat. do not archive --


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:52:32 AM PST US
    From: Pollus <pollus@fornerod.nl>
    Subject: Re: D-Day
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Pollus <pollus@fornerod.nl> Hi Pat. Here in Holland the general perception is that the Canadians liberated us. Some days later came the Brits but because they were better looking they got all the girls... Ironically, the folks that hit our beaches nowadays are the Germans. They invade us by thousands on a sunny day. I think it takes a simplification like "The longest day" to explain it to our kids... OB Kolb subject: Pat, is it flying yet? Greetings from Holland. Pollus do not archive Op 7-jun-05 om 12:28 heeft PATRICK LADD het volgende geschreven: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "PATRICK LADD" > <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> > > I salute you brave men of my Father's generation that hit the the > beaches>> > > It s nice to have an all inclusive group, `fathers generation`, which > can > include Dutch, Norwegian, Polish, British, French, Canadians, > Australians, > New Zealanders, Indians etc., > > According to Hollywood there were only Americans on the beaches. > > No, I apologise. The Brits did get a mention in `The Longest Day`. > About 25 > seconds on screen, just before the Americans dropped on St Mere Eglise > and > wrapped up the campaign. > > I wish that we had a film industry. Then WE would have won the war. > > Cheers > Pat > > do not archive > > > -- > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:21:20 AM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: UV Block
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> | sunlight to shine through. Needs several more coats to become opaque but I | cannot afford the extra weight. guess I shall just have to put up with it. | | Cheers | | Pat. Pat/All: May be a little late, but...........didn't you use Polyspray as a UV block prior to the finish paint? That is what keeps the sunlight from shining through. john h


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:37:51 AM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: UV Block
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net> Polytone whites are REAL stingy with the pigment. Anyone about to use it should consider that they will either need twice as much or maybe find a compatible pigment to add from an automotive paint supplier. -Even with a good poly spray undercoat it will look an anemic white unless several coats are slathered on. Personally I don't like those real thicky looking paint jobs. -BB do not archive On 7, Jun 2005, at 8:21 AM, John Hauck wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> > > | The white paint on the cage fabric allows the > but I > with it. > > Pat/All: > > May be a little late, but...........didn't you use Polyspray as a UV > block prior to the finish paint? That is what keeps the sunlight from > shining through. > > john h > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:55:53 AM PST US
    From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com>
    Subject: Re: D-Day
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com> > > I wish that we had a film industry. Then WE would have won the war. > > Cheers > Pat I understand that. Some in the movie industry here called us "Baby Killers"..... Do not archive


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:58:21 AM PST US
    From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com>
    Subject: Re: MKIII Flight to MV and Beyond (still continuing)
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com> I'm curious as to whether you've decided to use any of mine ?? I did offer to send whatever resolution you need. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "George T. Alexander, Jr." <gtalexander@att.net> Subject: RE: Kolb-List: MKIII Flight to MV and Beyond (still continuing) > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "George T. Alexander, Jr." > <gtalexander@att.net> > > Kolbers: > > I took John Hauck's text and images and put them together in a web site > for > his trip out west. > You can view them at: > > http://home.comcast.net/~kolb-driver > > Thanks to John H., John W., Jim Heffner, Will Uribe, Rick Neilsen and the > others for sharing their material with all of us. Those of us that didn't > make the trip get to share a little of it with you. > > Fun, Safe Flying > > George Alexander > http://gtalexander.home.att.net > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:05:36 AM PST US
    From: DAquaNut@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com Fireflyers, I need help! I am trying to verify if my tach is correct. I have secured an optical tach. My problem is. How do you tell which gearbox you have and what the gear ratio is. My Firefly is nearly 30 mi from my house now, so I cant go out and look at it in the garage like I used to. I purchased the 447 engine package from the New Kolb.. I need to figure out what rpms the prop should turn to equal 6300 rpms at the engine . Also the manual says to re-torque the heads to 221 inch pounds at 2 hours run time. My torque wrench only goes to 200 " lbs. I think that equates to 18-19 foot pounds. Does that sound right? Ed


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:19 AM PST US
    From: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com>
    Subject: More MV Photos
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> Group, I posted some photos from Monument Valley on Yahoo. I know that others have shared many excellent photos, so I selected 7 that might be worthy. http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/jrjungexecpccom/my_photos John Jung Firestar II


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:29:09 AM PST US
    From: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> Topher and Group, Now that I have my Firestar down to 3 gph at 60 mph, I'd like to get it to cruise faster without burning too much more fuel. 80 mph at 4 gph would be a nice goal. Maybe some day I will change to an HKS700, but for now, I would like to see how much improvement I can make with a 503. Currently, I am fully enclosed to behind the back seat. How much improvement might I get if I enclosed the area above the tanks? What else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do have streamline struts. I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or experience. John Jung


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:12:13 AM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: More MV Photos
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM05@comcast.net> John/Everyone Very nice photos. Thanks for sharing them. For those of you that were sill out flying after Monument Valley I got a response from Mary Jones at EAA's Sport Pilot. She promised that she would publish a report of our Monument Valley flyin if I sent her a write up and photos. So I asked for everyone's best photos to be placed on George Alexander's web site at http://home.comcast.net/~kolbflyer/ by sending George a copy of you best photos at gtalexander@att.net We didn't get very good response to this request so I went ahead and started writing The following is a first cut at the article. PLEASE send me your comments AND recommendations for the best photos to put in the article and were. Again I'm not a writer so please help. Also I stole some words from Lar's web site. Also I didn't have the photos from the Johns (times three) when I wrote this so everyone send me your votes for the best photos and were (in the article) you would put them. On May 20-22 we had our third annual Kolb Flyin at Monument Valley. Some have said unplanned and unorganized but everything was perfect so it's agreed that we will not fix it. We used the wonderful facilities at Goulding's Resort. They have a 1st class facility with a full range of services. At left center is the hotel, restaurant, gift shop and museum. Center is the gas station, snack shop/convenience store, and car wash. Laundromat is behind it, and airport to the right and in front. Community services and campground are in the green area in the canyon. Prices are fair (cheep by air show standards) , service excellent, food delicious. What more could you ask for ?? Be sure to try the Navajo Taco in the restaurant. {Larry Bourne's Goulding Photo here} A Kluster of Kolbs ?? Nawww, too trite, but we did have a good turnout with Mk III's, FireStars, FireFlies, and a Kolbra, not to mention a Cessna C175 and a Mooney {Larry Bourne's Flight line Photo here} More than Half the Kolbs at the Flyin actually flew in. There were two from Texas (a Kolbra and MKIIIc), one from Alabama (MKIIIc), one from Arizona (Firestar II) Things got off to a slow start on Friday as people arrived throughout the day. But those that were there didn't wait. {Several take off and landing photos here} Friday evening as the sun was setting the monuments took on a deep red glow as a back drop for the Kolbs setting on the runway at Gouldings. {Rick's photo of Kolbra and MKIIIc with monument behind} Back at camp the hanger flying gets into high gear. {One of Lars night camp photos here} Saturday morning different monuments took on that red glow to high light the takeoff of John Hauck's Miss P'fer. {Rick's photo of John Hauck's Miss P'fer} As the morning progressed the fun really got going as everyone took to the air. Those that had planes shared their airplanes and the unique geological beauty of Monument Valley. {Rick's photo of monument under C175 wing} {Jim Hefner's flight photos (sill waiting)} {Lar's flight two photos (still waiting)} At mid-morning the wind came up and the intrepid pilots returned to earth to visit and relax. 90 degree temps sent some into the shade of this conveniently parked RV's awnings, {Lar's camper awning photo} .......and some into the shade of wings. Could it get any nicer than this ?? {Lar's sitting under wing photo} The location couldn't be better. The scenery is breath taking and we have the air in the Valley all to ourselves except for a few Caravans and Twin Otters that fly tourists directly in and out of the Goulding Resort. The airport elevation is almost 7,000 feet ASL with temperatures close to the 90 degree mark. The heavily loaded tour planes struggling into the air make a stark contrast to our Kolbs relatively unaffected by the high density altitude. {Rick's Caravan Photo} When the wind died down in the afternoon and temperatures dropped, we headed out again. This year it seems like more people headed north to the San Juan River, near Mexican Hat, Utah for the different scenery there. It was great. {Undetermined San Juan Photos here} After flying on Saturday some of us took a 10 min. hike above the camp ground to view the arch and other scenery. {Undetermined arch photo} Sunday morning most of us met at the Gouldings restaurant for breakfast and more talk before heading back to reality. Do Not archive Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ---- Original Message ----- From: "John Jung" <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> Subject: Kolb-List: More MV Photos > --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> > > Group, > > I posted some photos from Monument Valley on Yahoo. > I know that others have shared many excellent photos, so I selected 7 > that might be worthy. > > http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/jrjungexecpccom/my_photos > > John Jung > Firestar II


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:38:28 AM PST US
    From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart@ldd.net>
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart@ldd.net> At 09:55 AM 6/7/05 EDT, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com > > >Fireflyers, > > I need help! I am trying to verify if my tach is correct. I have secured >an optical tach. My problem is. How do you tell which gearbox you have and >what the gear ratio is. My Firefly is nearly 30 mi from my house now, so I >cant go out and look at it in the garage like I used to. I purchased the 447 >engine package from the New Kolb.. I need to figure out what rpms the prop >should turn to equal 6300 rpms at the engine . Also the manual says to re-torque >the heads to 221 inch pounds at 2 hours run time. My torque wrench only goes >to 200 " lbs. I think that equates to 18-19 foot pounds. Does that sound >right? > > Ed > Ed, Your torque value is correct. As to the engine gear box ration, remove the pull starter. Using an incline meter rotate the propeller to the horizontal position. Again using the incline meter mark on the exposed flywheel level with the center of rotation. Then have some one slowly rotate the propeller through one turn and bring it back to the horizontal position. Count the number of engine revolutions as the propeller is turned. Then use the incline meter to determine the position of the flywheel mark relative to the center of rotation and the horizontal. Divide the number obtained by 360 and add it to the number of full turns, and you will have the gear box turn ratio. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN Jack & Louise Hart jbhart@ldd.net


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:42:00 AM PST US
    From: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart@ldd.net>
    Subject: Re: 1st Fly
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart@ldd.net> At 05:36 PM 6/6/05 -0400, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Bob Pongracz" <pongoflyer@myway.com> > > >Hi all, I had noticed some time ago a discussion on Kolb serial numbers...so I though I'd check the number on the FF project that I'm trying to get together. Needless to say, I was a bit surprised to see "UL 001" stamped onto the rear of the fuselage! I bought the plane from Dennis Souder, who had told me that it was a factory demo plane, but I had no idea it was the first Firefly. It's a bit intimidating - a small piece of Kolb history. It had made the airshow circuits as the Firefly was introduced. Originally, I was hoping to fly it to Homer's on the 18th, but life has to go on it's still airframe pieces in the hangar. Hopefully, by the end of the summer, it will be airborne with a new lease on life. I'll keep the list posted when the first flight happens.do not archive Regards,Bob PongraczFogelsville, PAFF #001 project > Bob, Cage and serial numbers may not be the same. In my case, I believe my cage number is five but when I called the old Kolb Company to get my serial number, I was given four. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN Jack & Louise Hart jbhart@ldd.net


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:18:39 PM PST US
    From: "George T. Alexander, Jr." <gtalexander@att.net>
    Subject: MKIII Flight to MV and Beyond (still continuing)
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "George T. Alexander, Jr." <gtalexander@att.net> Kolbers: John Jung's images (plus one of him taken by Big Lar) have been added to the MV Site at: http://home.comcast.net/~kolbflyer/ George Alexander


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:36 PM PST US
    From: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> John, we made an enclosure for above the tanks to blend in the air coming around the rear enclosure. I expect it does a fair job of eliminating the drag from the back side of the enclosure. It is probably not optimum for aerodynamics, but we compromised to make it easy to get to the gas tanks for refueling. Here is a picture. If you are interested, I can send you a few more pics. http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/Latch.html Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) At 08:28 AM 6/7/2005 -0700, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> > >Topher and Group, > >Now that I have my Firestar down to 3 gph at 60 mph, I'd like to get it >to cruise faster without burning too much more fuel. 80 mph at 4 gph >would be a nice goal. Maybe some day I will change to an HKS700, but >for now, I would like to see how much improvement I can make with a >503. > >Currently, I am fully enclosed to behind the back seat. How much >improvement might I get if I enclosed the area above the tanks? What >else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do >have streamline struts. > >I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or >experience. > >John Jung > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:35:58 PM PST US
    From: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> Jack's method is exact, but here is an easier way. Take out a spark plug. Take a thin wooden dowel and stick it down the plug hole. Put the piston at top dead center (best you can tell) and turn the prop through one full revolution. Since the A box and B box come in 2:1, 2.24:1, and 2.58:1 ratios, then after two trips down and up, the stick will either be back at top dead center. (2:1 ratio) Or it will make two trips down and up and then go half way down. (2.24:1 ratio) Or it will make two trips down and up, and then down again to a hair past bottom dead center. (2.58:1) Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) At 12:36 PM 6/7/2005 -0500, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: Jack & Louise Hart <jbhart@ldd.net> > >At 09:55 AM 6/7/05 EDT, you wrote: > >--> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com > > > > > >Fireflyers, > > > > I need help! I am trying to verify if my tach is > correct. I have secured > >an optical tach. My problem is. How do you tell which gearbox you have and > >what the gear ratio is. My Firefly is nearly 30 mi from my house now, so I > >cant go out and look at it in the garage like I used to. I purchased > the 447 > >engine package from the New Kolb.. I need to figure out what rpms the > prop > >should turn to equal 6300 rpms at the engine . Also the manual says to > re-torque > >the heads to 221 inch pounds at 2 hours run time. My torque wrench only > goes > >to 200 " lbs. I think that equates to 18-19 foot pounds. Does that sound > >right? > > > > Ed > > >Ed, > >Your torque value is correct. > >As to the engine gear box ration, remove the pull starter. Using an incline >meter rotate the propeller to the horizontal position. Again using the >incline meter mark on the exposed flywheel level with the center of >rotation. Then have some one slowly rotate the propeller through one turn >and bring it back to the horizontal position. Count the number of engine >revolutions as the propeller is turned. Then use the incline meter to >determine the position of the flywheel mark relative to the center of >rotation and the horizontal. Divide the number obtained by 360 and add it >to the number of full turns, and you will have the gear box turn ratio. > >Jack B. Hart FF004 >Winchester, IN > > >Jack & Louise Hart >jbhart@ldd.net > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:54:41 PM PST US
    From: "Silver Fern Microlights Ltd" <kiwimick@sfmicro.fsnet.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: Trailering a Kolb
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Silver Fern Microlights Ltd" <kiwimick@sfmicro.fsnet.co.uk> Pat /All. I understand the main reason of supporting the boom while in transit is to keep the weight off the tail wheel rod so as not to bend it. Mike Xtra/Jab 2200 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Trailering a Kolb > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> > > thing but > get > > Pat/Gang: > > Trailering and taxiing an airplane are much harder on the structure > than one will ever encounter while flying in the air. > > Not hard to get a tail boom in an unserviceable condition by getting > dings and dimples from mishandling while trailering. Rough roads, > improperly securing the airplane on the trailer, will readily render > it unserviceable. > > Don't think I would lose too much sleep over a 6" round spar failing > in flight. I doubt any of us club fisted pilots could figure out a > way to cause a failure other than sawing it in two. > > john h > MKIII > Titus, Alabama > > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:12:26 PM PST US
    From: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman@dejazzd.com>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman@dejazzd.com> Could you guys who have a full screen windshield on your Firestar describe how you hinged it to open? A picture or two would be helpful also. Thanks. On Jun 7, 2005, at 11:28 AM, John Jung wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> > > Topher and Group, > > Now that I have my Firestar down to 3 gph at 60 mph, I'd like to get it > to cruise faster without burning too much more fuel. 80 mph at 4 gph > would be a nice goal. Maybe some day I will change to an HKS700, but > for now, I would like to see how much improvement I can make with a > 503. > > Currently, I am fully enclosed to behind the back seat. How much > improvement might I get if I enclosed the area above the tanks? What > else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do > have streamline struts. > > I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or > experience. > > John Jung > >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:51:41 PM PST US
    From: "nmatthew" <nmatthew@qwest.net>
    Subject: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "nmatthew" <nmatthew@qwest.net> Just divide inch pounds by 12 for foot pounds- 18.4... Matthew North FF029 Tucson, AZ -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of DAquaNut@aol.com Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Which Gearbox and Ratio --> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com Fireflyers, I need help! I am trying to verify if my tach is correct. I have secured an optical tach. My problem is. How do you tell which gearbox you have and what the gear ratio is. My Firefly is nearly 30 mi from my house now, so I cant go out and look at it in the garage like I used to. I purchased the 447 engine package from the New Kolb.. I need to figure out what rpms the prop should turn to equal 6300 rpms at the engine . Also the manual says to re-torque the heads to 221 inch pounds at 2 hours run time. My torque wrench only goes to 200 " lbs. I think that equates to 18-19 foot pounds. Does that sound right? Ed


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:52 PM PST US
    From: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Windscreen
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung <jrjungjr@yahoo.com> Eugene and Group, The full windscreen has no hinge on the Firestar II. It is attached on the left and flexes as it opens from the right. John Jung


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:52 PM PST US
    From: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net>
    Subject: Re: Trailering a Kolb
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net> My Mk 3 had a broken tail boom from it being transported without the boom supported. > > Pat /All. > I understand the main reason of supporting the boom while in transit is to > keep the weight off the tail wheel rod so as not to bend it. > > Mike > Xtra/Jab 2200


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:53 PM PST US
    From: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net> at > else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do > have streamline struts. > > I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or > experience. > > John Jung some of the things I have done on my Mk 3 is to widen the back of the cage. This keeps the airflow on the fuselage sides rather than breaking free at the shoulder point causing turbulence and drag. The wider, more abrubt break at the back also has an aerodynamic function refered to as the kammback effect (sp). A lot of cars used this idea after it was noticed station wagons performed better in wind tunnels. I also did not run my cockpit up to the wing. There is a gap between my wing and cockpit creating a parasol type aircraft. Padre' Pike has a similar setup on his Mk 3. I figured I gained 3 more feet of wing plus the loss of drag at the 2 connecting points. I don't know if these ideas will help on a firestar. Fairings on the wing strut attach points will help also if you can design an easy to remove system. If you want to get into more work and expense you could create different more effective wing tips also. Perhaps gap seals on the rudder and elevators too.


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:57 PM PST US
    From: WADE LAWICKI <wlawicki@yahoo.com>
    Subject: reason for ultra star crash
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: WADE LAWICKI <wlawicki@yahoo.com> ray/group, the integrity of the kolb design was not the reason!!! the reason was that being as nice a person as he WAS, he repeatedly did the same kind of field fixes with his trike, and took the condition of his aircraft with little regard. the patches to the gear leg looked like aluminum to me on Saturday morning, the 1 inch x 4 inch chunk out of one of his ultra prop blades should have been enough to keep any pilot in their right mind on the ground. Your assuming that the steel was 4130 ? i first meet him in 2004 when he came to a fly-in in his trike with; busted motor mount welds,busted muffler bracket welds, bolts missing and another prop with a large chunk missing. PILOT ERROR is most defiantly the cause, but the error started on the ground and in the air long before that Sunday morning in his lack of concern for aircraft condition. Most of us are in the "IF" category, I had him in my "WHEN" category and now sadly i have to put yet another pilot in my "DID" category. He was a very nice person and will be missed. Fly Safe, Wade FS #1030 do not archive --------------------------------- Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:56:09 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com> Good stuff, Woody. Wasn't it Ron Christensen who, a few years ago, built his "Mk III 1/2" out here on the Best Coast ?? He made shortened fiberglass droop tips for the wings, as I recall, and wasn't too happy with them. There's a couple of un-clear pictures of them on my website on the "Gullwing Doors" page. He went to a huge amount of time and effort trying 2 or 3 other shapes and lengths, and eventually wound up with the stock Kolb wingtips. Food for thought. Lar. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Firestar aerodynamics > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net> > > > at >> else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do >> have streamline struts. >> >> I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or >> experience. >> >> John Jung > > > some of the things I have done on my Mk 3 is to widen the back of the > cage. This keeps the airflow on the fuselage sides rather than breaking > free > at the shoulder point causing turbulence and drag. The wider, more abrubt > break at the back also has an aerodynamic function refered to as the > kammback effect (sp). A lot of cars used this idea after it was noticed > station wagons performed better in wind tunnels. I also did not run my > cockpit up to the wing. There is a gap between my wing and cockpit > creating > a parasol type aircraft. Padre' Pike has a similar setup on his Mk 3. I > figured I gained 3 more feet of wing plus the loss of drag at the 2 > connecting points. I don't know if these ideas will help on a firestar. > Fairings on the wing strut attach points will help also if you can design > an > easy to remove system. If you want to get into more work and expense you > could create different more effective wing tips also. Perhaps gap seals on > the rudder and elevators too. > > >


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:59:25 PM PST US
    From: "Beauford" <beauford@tampabay.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Beauford" <beauford@tampabay.rr.com> Hey Ed: Have been reading the diverse responses to your ratio question... they are undoubtedly all correct, and each of the the procedures provided in them would be fascinating to execute... But, being an intellectually disenfranchised 'ol soldier, and certainly not a math major, it has crossed my feeble mind that a a true deep-thinker would just go ahead and read the ratio numbers where the stinking Rotax fairy stamped them on the rear of the gearbox on the little raised flange just below the prop hub as the engine was on the way out the factory door... at least that's where she...he...it... whatever the hermans are hiring for fairies these days, stamped it on both my "B" boxes... Both of mine are stamped "2,58 DO" indicating 2:58 ratio... Betcha that's what you got with your 447, too... but then, who knows... been wrong before... been married 39 years, so I'm a quart low on credibility and self esteem anyway... (but if'n I was you, I'd go quietly sneak a peek fer the fairy numbers before I went and got out the calculator, pullys, coathangers, chalk, string, and smoke grenade....) Do Not Archive Hope this helps... Regards, Beauford FF#076 ----- Original Message ----- From: <DAquaNut@aol.com> Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Which Gearbox and Ratio > --> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com > > > Fireflyers, > > I need help! I am trying to verify if my tach is correct. I have > secured > an optical tach. My problem is. How do you tell which gearbox you have > and > what the gear ratio is. My Firefly is nearly 30 mi from my house now, so > I > cant go out and look at it in the garage like I used to. I purchased the > 447 > engine package from the New Kolb.. I need to figure out what rpms the > prop > should turn to equal 6300 rpms at the engine . Also the manual says to > re-torque > the heads to 221 inch pounds at 2 hours run time. My torque wrench only > goes > to 200 " lbs. I think that equates to 18-19 foot pounds. Does that sound > right? > > Ed > > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:36 PM PST US
    From: ray anderson <rsanoa@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: reason for ultra star crash
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: ray anderson <rsanoa@yahoo.com> Wade, You are correct in that the "splint" on the gear leg was aluminum, but the 4130 steel I mentioned, and referred to specifically, is the steel insert in the end of the struts. The left one remained in the proper fitting on the cage, while the right one had been pulled cleanly through the attach bolt, which remained in place. The right wing passed through the tree and this apparently was the reason for the right strut end pulling cleanly out of the cage fitting. A close examination of the steel insert in the strut end didn't show any signs of stress cracks or rusted area, only the sheared path where it pulled out of the bolt. All in all, it was a sobering thing to see what awesome forces can be generated in even a 200-250 ft. dive straight down, with power on, into the ground. Makes me doubly comforted knowing I have the BRS mounted. Wade was the other Kolb at the fly in yours. Pretty nice. Ray WADE LAWICKI <wlawicki@yahoo.com> wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: WADE LAWICKI ray/group, the integrity of the kolb design was not the reason!!! the reason was that being as nice a person as he WAS, he repeatedly did the same kind of field fixes with his trike, and took the condition of his aircraft with little regard. the patches to the gear leg looked like aluminum to me on Saturday morning, the 1 inch x 4 inch chunk out of one of his ultra prop blades should have been enough to keep any pilot in their right mind on the ground. Your assuming that the steel was 4130 ? i first meet him in 2004 when he came to a fly-in in his trike with; busted motor mount welds,busted muffler bracket welds, bolts missing and another prop with a large chunk missing. PILOT ERROR is most defiantly the cause, but the error started on the ground and in the air long before that Sunday morning in his lack of concern for aircraft condition. Most of us are in the "IF" category, I had him in my "WHEN" category and now sadly i have to put yet another pilot in my "DID" category. He was a very nice person and will be missed. Fly Safe, Wade FS #1030 do not archive --------------------------------- Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out! --------------------------------- Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:35 PM PST US
    From: DAquaNut@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: DAquaNut@aol.com In a message dated 6/7/2005 8:59:55 P.M. Central Standard Time, beauford@tampabay.rr.com writes: go quietly sneak a peek fer the fairy numbers before I went and got out the calculator, pullys, coathangers, chalk, string, and smoke grenade....) Do Not Archive Hope this helps... Regards, Beauford FF#076 ----- Beauford, I would have looked, but I explained in my post My firefly is 30 mi away now and I cant go out in the garage and look. I was hoping for info like you have given me. I did not know if it had something stamped on it or not. I was hoping it would have it on there somewhere. That has to be the easiest way. but if it doesn't I will still be able to do the math . I am already breathing easier. My Thanks to You and ALL the others that took the time to respond. Ed (in Hou. ) Do not archive


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:42:40 PM PST US
    From: WhiskeyVictor36@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: WhiskeyVictor36@aol.com In a message dated 6/7/2005 11:29:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, jrjungjr@yahoo.com writes: What else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? Hey John Jung, I recall a similar discussion on streamlining Kolbs to get higher speeds took place a few years ago. Someone of great knowledge stated that "you can't make a butterfly go fast". Bill Varnes Original Kolb FireStar Audubon NJ Do Not Archive


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:12 PM PST US
    From: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com> > >Topher and Group, >Now that I have my Firestar down to 3 gph at 60 mph, I'd like to get it >to cruise faster without burning too much more fuel. 80 mph at 4 gph >would be a nice goal. Maybe some day I will change to an HKS700, but >for now, I would like to see how much improvement I can make with a >503. >Currently, I am fully enclosed to behind the back seat. How much >improvement might I get if I enclosed the area above the tanks? What >else might I do to get my Firestar to cruise more efficiently? I do >have streamline struts. >I'm looking for ideas from anyone with similar interest, knowledge or >experience. > >John Jung I can get about 4 gph at 75 mph and 5900 rpm (503 dual carb) on mine with the back enclosed and the back lift strut off ( it was a waste and extra drag anyway) - The streamline struts did the most. I used to have the streamlined gear legs, they were also waste of time - but they looked good. You should get a cleaner air flow to the prop. I never had the "unenclosed" back section - even with my old KXP - so I don't know for sure. Maybe your new jets will make a difference. My engine is too old (638 hrs) or I would try downsized jets just to see for myself. <http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/covering.jpg>http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/covering.jpg http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/BRSsys.jpg <http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Modrearframe.jpg>http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Modrearframe.jpg http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Sideview.jpg


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:11:02 PM PST US
    From: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Firestar aerodynamics
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com> At 07:10 PM 6/7/2005, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: Eugene Zimmerman ><eugenezimmerman@dejazzd.com> > >Could you guys who have a full screen windshield on your Firestar >describe how you hinged it to open? A picture or two would be helpful >also. >Thanks. They used to sell a kit for this but here's a picture or two. I got the "high" sides so it's harder to get into, but funner to fly - like a "X-Wing" star fighter - ha all strapped in and nobody can touch you. http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Airscoops.jpg http://www.mindspring.com/~possums/Sideview.jpg


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:14:09 PM PST US
    From: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Which Gearbox and Ratio
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com> At 10:05 PM 6/7/2005, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Beauford" <beauford@tampabay.rr.com> > >Hey Ed: >Have been reading the diverse responses to your ratio question.. been >wrong before... been married 39 years, so I'm a >quart low on credibility and self esteem anyway.. 39 years........No I won't go there.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --