Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:30 AM - Re: Oil clean up (Larry Bourne)
2. 12:48 AM - Re: Engine problems (Eugene Zimmerman)
3. 04:37 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (Kirk Smith)
4. 04:54 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (Daniel Walter)
5. 04:56 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (flykolb)
6. 05:51 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (Rusty)
7. 06:13 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (robert bean)
8. 06:26 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (Beauford)
9. 09:05 AM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (Kirk Smith)
10. 09:27 AM - Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. (Jason Omelchuck)
11. 09:45 AM - Re: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. (John Hauck)
12. 09:47 AM - Re: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. (James, Ken)
13. 12:29 PM - Re: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. (Richard Pike)
14. 01:42 PM - Hanger Update (N27SB@aol.com)
15. 01:47 PM - Prop Size (Dave & Eve Pelletier)
16. 02:15 PM - Re: Prop Size (Richard Pike)
17. 02:50 PM - I've got GREAT NEWS (Mike Pierzina)
18. 03:08 PM - Re: I've got GREAT NEWS (Rusty)
19. 03:23 PM - Re: I've got GREAT NEWS (Christopher Armstrong)
20. 03:31 PM - Re: BRS chute installation (James Tripp)
21. 04:16 PM - Re: I've got GREAT NEWS (possums)
22. 05:27 PM - Re: I've got GREAT NEWS (Larry Bourne)
23. 05:27 PM - New Kolber in Lancaster, SC (Ken Harrison)
24. 05:36 PM - Quality of the older Rotax 582 (JUDD LYNN)
25. 06:04 PM - Re: Quality of the older Rotax 582 (John Hauck)
26. 06:09 PM - Re: New Kolber in Lancaster, SC (HShack@aol.com)
27. 06:22 PM - Re: New Kolber (Mike Pierzina)
28. 06:25 PM - Re: Quality of the older Rotax 582 (Richard Pike)
29. 07:06 PM - Re: Engine problem - follow up (woody)
30. 07:11 PM - Re: New Kolber in Lancaster, SC (John Williamson)
31. 08:09 PM - Re: Suzuki Turbo G10 Weigh-In (Richard Swiderski)
32. 09:26 PM - Re: A message from John Cleese (possums)
33. 10:00 PM - Re: Re: A message from John Cleese (possums)
34. 10:09 PM - Re: Prop Size (Denny Rowe)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Oil clean up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com>
I'm having a little trouble getting off the ground this morning, with
relatives visiting from up north. At least it's cooled off some, and is
only in the mid 90's. I've already got 2 options to work with so far, and
if they don't pan out, I'll give yours a try. Sounds like a good 'un.
Thanks. Lar. Do not Archive.
Larry Bourne
Palm Springs, CA
Building Kolb Mk III
N78LB Vamoose
www.gogittum.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Cowan" <trc1917@direcway.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: Oil clean up
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: Ted Cowan <trc1917@direcway.com>
>
> Just wanted to let you know my special cleaning solution for oily exhaust
> and dirt on fabric. I use this formula on gas RC planes and ultralights.
> I
> use a spray bottle of windex regular and put about 20 % "Goo Gone" in it.
> It does not stay mixed but if you shake it before use it will work okay.
> Goo Gone is an oil based spot remover that your wife (girl friend/friends)
> Mother would love if they dont already use it. Found in Wal-Marts,
> grocery
> stores, etc. Leaves a really nice shinny fabric when used. Try it, you
> will like it. Really works great to get that exhaust/spark plug oil off
> our
> white T shirt. Ted Cowan, Alabama. Has anyone heard from John Cooley,
> Lucedale, Ms?
>
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problems |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Eugene Zimmerman <eugenezimmerman@dejazzd.com>
Try reducing the prop pitch.
The 532 has a very steep powerband curve and too much pitch will keep
the engine from getting up on to the tuned frequency of the exaust
system.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 4:11 AM, flykolb wrote:
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
>
> Kolbers,
>
> I am having a problem with my Rotax 532 that a number of rotax
> repair shops have not been able to solve for me.
>
> The problem is this: when I start the engine, it usually only runs
> about 1000 RPM, not even at idle. If I advance the throtle, it
> dies; if I retard the throtle, it keeps running but very, very rough.
>
> I sent the engine to steve at Airscrew who rebuilt the gear box and
> installed CDI to replace the points. When I got it back there was
> no change.
>
> If I start and stop it often enough, sometimes it will work ok and
> even can go to full power. It seems to do this best when hot rather
> than cold.
>
> I thought I had the problem solved today and it started many times
> and let me run it up but then when it cooled down it acted up again.
>
> I think it is gas related, probably with the carbs. I replaced the
> fuel pump and even tried an electric pump - no change.
>
> Cleaned the carbs - no change.
>
> When it is running rough at 1000 rpm and I use the enricher
> circuit, it dies. This leads me to believe that maybe it is getting
> flooded. But how?
>
> Please help!!!!
>
> I'm sure with the collective wisdom of the list, someone out there
> has the answer for me!
>
> Jim
> Masrk III
>
>
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com>
> Any other ideas?
Have you torn that carb apart completely and soaked it in Gunk carb cleaner?
Being an old engine , it could be gummed up from fuel sitting in it for long
periods of time
Do not archive
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Daniel Walter" <worrybear@verizon.net>
Just a thought, I had a similar problem with a cayuna cdi, the ignition
switch was bad. It would run but not good, may want to check switches and
wires.
Do Not Archive
Dan Walter
Ultrastar
Palmyra, PA
----- Original Message -----
From: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: Engine problem - follow up
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
> One thing I forgot to mention was that with the prop off, the engine runs
fine. As soon as I load it up with a prop the troubles begin - but not all
the time.
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
Kirk, Robert, Eugene and all,
I am using a two blade wood prop (fixed pitch) which has worked fine for
over 100 hours.
I took the carb apart and used carb cleaner throughout.
I will check for an intake leak.
Thanks and please keep the suggestions coming.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Engine problem - follow up
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com>
>
> > Any other ideas?
>
> Have you torn that carb apart completely and soaked it in Gunk carb
cleaner?
> Being an old engine , it could be gummed up from fuel sitting in it for
long
> periods of time
>
> Do not archive
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Rusty" <13brv3c@bellsouth.net>
Hi Jim,
A couple folks have indicated that the dampener in the gear box can cause
this, and your test without the prop may just prove it. I also agree that a
gear box rebuilder might not necessarily be able to tell if this is bad on
inspection.
When you try to accelerate, is the engine very rough, and do you hear a loud
rattly sound? If so, I'd try to borrow another gear box, or have the
dampener spring assembly replaced.
If it isn't rough and noisy, then it's still a mystery.
Good luck,
Rusty (not a Rotax guy)
-----------------------
One thing I forgot to mention was that with the prop off, the engine runs
fine. As soon as I load it up with a prop the troubles begin - but not all
the time.
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
Any engine with a redrive can exhibit off idle problems. The 3 cyl
suzuki with the cog belt has to be given a little throttle at start
or can hang up in the 1000 area if it's cold. First start is a little
abrupt.
Only 7 hours to go on my test phase. If the weather continues to
cooperate and the durn bearing I've been wrestling with in my
redrive holds together. I've become intimately familiar with that
thing.
Sunday morning I was heading to a fly in breakfast and it was
chilly enough to wear gloves, sweatshirt, jacket, no long underwear
yet. After I rose up over 200' I got into some welcome warm
southern air. Sure made the ride a lot nicer.
-BB, MkIIIc
do not archive
On 12, Sep 2005, at 8:50 AM, Rusty wrote:
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Rusty" <13brv3c@bellsouth.net>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> A couple folks have indicated that the dampener in the gear box can
> cause
> this, and your test without the prop may just prove it. I also agree
> that a
> gear box rebuilder might not necessarily be able to tell if this is
> bad on
> inspection.
>
> When you try to accelerate, is the engine very rough, and do you hear
> a loud
> rattly sound? If so, I'd try to borrow another gear box, or have the
> dampener spring assembly replaced.
>
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Beauford" <beauford@tampabay.rr.com>
Jim: I hate to bring this up... but you could get a pickup truck and take
it to Lockwood.....
(Take your VISA)
Beauford
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: Engine problem - follow up
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "flykolb" <flykolb@carolina.rr.com>
>
> Kolbers,
>
> Thanks for all the imput.
>
> One thing I forgot to mention was that with the prop off, the engine runs
> fine. As soon as I load it up with a prop the troubles begin - but not all
> the time.
>
> The fuel level in the carbs is correct.
> The main jets are tight.
> The screens are on the main jets.
> The clip on the jet needle is correct.
> The gear box was just rebuilt (problem occurred before this and there was
> no improvement).
>
> Any other ideas?
>
> Jim
>
> "I am having a problem with my Rotax 532 that a number of rotax repair
> shops have not been able to solve for me.
>
> The problem is this: when I start the engine, it usually only runs about
> 1000 RPM, not even at idle. If I advance the throtle, it dies; if I retard
> the throtle, it keeps running but very, very rough.
>
> I sent the engine to steve at Airscrew who rebuilt the gear box and
> installed CDI to replace the points. When I got it back there was no
> change.
>
> If I start and stop it often enough, sometimes it will work ok and even
> can go to full power. It seems to do this best when hot rather than cold.
>
> I thought I had the problem solved today and it started many times and let
> me run it up but then when it cooled down it acted up again.
>
> I think it is gas related, probably with the carbs. I replaced the fuel
> pump and even tried an electric pump - no change.
>
> Cleaned the carbs - no change.
>
> When it is running rough at 1000 rpm and I use the enricher circuit, it
> dies. This leads me to believe that maybe it is getting flooded. But how?
>
> Please help!!!!
>
> I'm sure with the collective wisdom of the list, someone out there has the
> answer for me!
>
> Jim
> Masrk III"
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Kirk Smith" <snuffy@usol.com>
> > Any other ideas?
While the engine is running, spray WD40 around the intake gaskets to see if
there is a change in rpm.
Do not archive
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jason Omelchuck" <jason@trek-tech.com>
Hello list,
I am in the process of installing a BRS in my MKIIIC. I would like some
input on where others have attached the harness to the airframe. The only
drawing I got from BRS is for a firestar and it has the bridal attached to
the round tube back by the 2 small diagonal braces. This puts it almost
under the engine on my MKIIIC. Where I would like to attach it is to the
round tube where it attaches to the square main spar attach tube and
actually put it around both tubes to keep it from sliding back. In the BRS
manual it says put it above the lateral CG (which it is) and behind the
vertical CG (which I am not sure it is). Please let me know where you all
have attached yours.
Jason
MKIIIC
BMW R100
Very close to inspection
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
| Jason
Hi Jason/All:
I mounted my BRS 1050 in the forward section of the center section.
Deployment handle is mounted right over my forehead in the bottom of
the center section.
The kevlar attachment bridals (2 ea) are attached to the gear leg
sockets, oen each socket, then attached to the single kevlar bridal
with the large steel carribiner (sp).
john h
MKIII
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "James, Ken" <KDJames@berkscareer.com>
I have a factory drawing (someplace) for a MK III X that I got at Oshkosh
Call them for a PDF file
http://brsparachutes.com/models.html
Ken
I will look for my drawing later if you still need it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Omelchuck [mailto:jason@trek-tech.com]
Subject: Kolb-List: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe.
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jason Omelchuck" <jason@trek-tech.com>
Hello list,
I am in the process of installing a BRS in my MKIIIC. I would like some
input on where others have attached the harness to the airframe. The only
drawing I got from BRS is for a firestar and it has the bridal attached to
the round tube back by the 2 small diagonal braces. This puts it almost
under the engine on my MKIIIC. Where I would like to attach it is to the
round tube where it attaches to the square main spar attach tube and
actually put it around both tubes to keep it from sliding back. In the BRS
manual it says put it above the lateral CG (which it is) and behind the
vertical CG (which I am not sure it is). Please let me know where you all
have attached yours.
Jason
MKIIIC
BMW R100
Very close to inspection
IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This communication is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. This e-mail contains information
from the Berks Career & Technology Center that may be privileged, confidential,
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this communication
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
and permanently delete this message including all attachments.
Thank you.
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Attaching a BRS Parachute to a MKIII Airframe. |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
On the MKIII, I have it secured to the square main spar carrythrough at the
top of the cabin, however that is just to keep it still, it actually
attaches for weight bearing purposes to the landing gear/main tube
structure cluster joint. Bear in mind that I am using a Second Chantz - out
of production softpack chute, not a BRS, so you may not be able to - or
wish to duplicate what I have done.
On the FSII we just finished, the attach point is the junction of the main
spar carrythrough and the engine mount tube. Which puts it right at all CG's.
Richard Pike
At 09:38 AM 9/12/05 -0700, you wrote:
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jason Omelchuck" <jason@trek-tech.com>
>
>Hello list,
>
>I am in the process of installing a BRS in my MKIIIC. I would like some
>input on where others have attached the harness to the airframe. The only
>drawing I got from BRS is for a firestar and it has the bridal attached to
>the round tube back by the 2 small diagonal braces. This puts it almost
>under the engine on my MKIIIC. Where I would like to attach it is to the
>round tube where it attaches to the square main spar attach tube and
>actually put it around both tubes to keep it from sliding back. In the BRS
>manual it says put it above the lateral CG (which it is) and behind the
>vertical CG (which I am not sure it is). Please let me know where you all
>have attached yours.
>
>Jason
>MKIIIC
>BMW R100
>Very close to inspection
>
>
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: N27SB@aol.com
To All:
Early this year I posted info about a hanger I purchased. I assembled most
of it in just two weeks by myself. Because of great weather and a ready to fly
Firefly it has taken several months to finish the details. It is amazing how
motivating a hurricane can be. Final cost:
$7500.00 Hanger delivered from Pitts to Orl
7000.00 30x40 ft Monopour Slab and foundation
3000.00 25x30 ft Entry Slab
1000.00 Sitework
1100.00 10x12 commercial roll up door
350.00 36" wide commercial steel entry door
0 My hard work
----------------------
$19500.00 Total
Not bad for a 30x40 ft all steel metal building that is 14 ft tall you can
assemble yourself that is rated for 140 mph wind. Keep in mind that I
contracted out the concrete but the building was assembled by me alone. About 3000
bolts.
do not archive
Steve Boetto
FireFly #007 on Floats
FireFly E017SB under construction
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Dave & Eve Pelletier" <pelletier@cableone.net>
Hey Guys,
I'm getting a Warp Drive prop to replace my IVO. The IVO is a 64" prop but
the Warp people tell me that Kolb MK III's with 582's can handle a 66" prop.
I measured and the distance from the hub center to the tube and it is 33 5/8"
which means a 66" prop would only give me 5/8" clearance. Kinda close to my
way of thinking. What're you MKIII Classic guys using?
AzDave
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
Modified motor mounts with extensions so I can run a 2 blade 68" Ivo.
Has about an inch clearance.
Love it.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
do not archive
At 01:46 PM 9/12/05 -0700, you wrote:
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Dave & Eve Pelletier"
><pelletier@cableone.net>
>
>Hey Guys,
>
> I'm getting a Warp Drive prop to replace my IVO. The IVO is a 64"
> prop but the Warp people tell me that Kolb MK III's with 582's can handle
> a 66" prop. I measured and the distance from the hub center to the tube
> and it is 33 5/8" which means a 66" prop would only give me 5/8"
> clearance. Kinda close to my way of thinking. What're you MKIII Classic
> guys using?
>
>AzDave
>
>
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | I've got GREAT NEWS |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Mike Pierzina <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com>
NO ! I'm not switching to GEICO insurance......
I called Falcon insurance (EAA) they had given me a quote back last October..........(
$700 liability)
and I had to take care of things like Airworthiness , Tailwheel endorsement , 5
hrs in LIKE aircraft........
anyway , I called the today to ask about paying "LESS" than the annual premium
because of the months that
I wouldn't be flying .....He said I can call and cancel the insurance......that
would put it on HOLD til winter passed
and I call him to reactivate it........COOL , because Winter doesn't hit on the
same month all the time......and on the other end it doesn't always leave on
the same month........This plan will work GREAT !
After I'm flying , I'll make improvements like inclosed cockpit , but for now
I just want to BEAT BIG LAR IN THE AIR.
Just kidding Big Lar..... I wish you the best of luck getting that BEAST in the
air....although , I told you before,
I think you should put your experiment on an engine stand , and put a proven combination
on your plane.....and fly it !
Gotta Fly...
Mike in MN
Do not archive
My Web Site:
http://www.geocities.com/planecrazzzy/Planecrazzzy.html
Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down...
---------------------------------
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | I've got GREAT NEWS |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Rusty" <13brv3c@bellsouth.net>
The oil leak is a necessary feature. He doesn't have a GPS, so he plans to
follow the oil trail back to the airport :-)
Rusty (NO room to talk about dumping oil in-flight...)
-----------------------
Just kidding Big Lar..... I wish you the best of luck getting that BEAST in
the air....although , I told you before, I think you should put your
experiment on an engine stand , and put a proven combination on your
plane.....and fly it !
Gotta Fly...
Mike in MN
Do not archive
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | I've got GREAT NEWS |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Christopher Armstrong" <tophera@centurytel.net>
Actually you just light the oil on fire, and have a smoke system on the
plane... then follow the smoke home! No not archive
Christopher Armstrong
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Rusty
Subject: RE: Kolb-List: I've got GREAT NEWS
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Rusty" <13brv3c@bellsouth.net>
The oil leak is a necessary feature. He doesn't have a GPS, so he plans to
follow the oil trail back to the airport :-)
Rusty (NO room to talk about dumping oil in-flight...)
-----------------------
Just kidding Big Lar..... I wish you the best of luck getting that BEAST in
the air....although , I told you before, I think you should put your
experiment on an engine stand , and put a proven combination on your
plane.....and fly it !
Gotta Fly...
Mike in MN
Do not archive
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | BRS chute installation |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "James Tripp" <jtripp@elmore.rr.com>
Curtis,
I attached my BRS handle after covering and finishing. I attached it in an
easy to reach and see location just in front of the throttle lever. BRS had
to send me a longer cable to reach that far but it works well for me. I can
send you some pictures direct if you want them.
James Tripp, FS II
Millbrook AL
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of curtis groote
Subject: Kolb-List: BRS chute installation
--> Kolb-List message posted by: curtis groote <cgroote1@yahoo.com>
I'm about to start covering my Firestar ll and
ultimately plan on a BRS chute. As nearly as I can
determine, the activation handle is attached to the
top longitudinal metal piece at the side of the cage
with a 5/8" clamp. Is this something that can wait
until after I get it covered or should I be
considering that now? Thanks.
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | I've got GREAT NEWS |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
At 06:07 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote:
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Rusty" <13brv3c@bellsouth.net>
>
>The oil leak is a necessary feature. He doesn't have a GPS, so he plans to
>follow the oil trail back to the airport :-)
This actually works=85.. I know from our last flight to Sun&Fun,
while bringing a batch (a "batch" I think that=92s right). Of new Possums,
We like to call them "yearlings" since they've been flying
about a year and ain't dead yet. You don't really want to fly to close behind
one, as they tend to have miscellaneous parts
fall off their planes all the way to Florida,
- mostly small stuff, like doors and muffler springs - things like that
- nothing that you really need. They're still learning what "safety wire"
is all about. We left a trail we could follow back to Georgia. Works as good
as an oil leak, I suppose.
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: I've got GREAT NEWS |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com>
I'm a working man (pardon me - I just got a promotion to Chief Engineer, so
now I'm in management) :-) and finances are limited. Besides, traveling and
other toys claim their share as well. Call me Stub-Bourne, but the VW is
gonna be it. Good Luck, Mike. Lar.
Do not Archive.
Larry Bourne
Palm Springs, CA
Building Kolb Mk III
N78LB Vamoose
www.gogittum.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Pierzina" <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: I've got GREAT NEWS
>
> After I'm flying , I'll make improvements like inclosed cockpit , but for
> now I just want to BEAT BIG LAR IN THE AIR.
>
> Just kidding Big Lar..... I wish you the best of luck getting that BEAST
> in the air....although , I told you before,
> I think you should put your experiment on an engine stand , and put a
> proven combination on your plane.....and fly it !
>
>
> Gotta Fly...
> Mike in MN
>
> Do not archive
>
>
> My Web Site:
> http://www.geocities.com/planecrazzzy/Planecrazzzy.html
>
>
> Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way
> down...
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
>
>
>
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | New Kolber in Lancaster, SC |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ken Harrison" <kenharrison@ubgcharlotte.com>
Hello all,
My name is Ken Harrison. I live in Lancaster, SC. Ive been lurking for
a couple months
I just bought a Kolb Firestar II from Bruce Harrison, my brother, in
Columbia SC. I am planning on licensing it as a E-LSA so I can take my kids
with me, but I have a few questions that I cant seem to get answered
looking in the EAA literature and on the web.
I was hoping someone on the list could help me
1. I have a Private Pilots license but do not have a taildragger
endorsement. If I register the FSII, will I need to get an endorsement? If
I do, is there any way I can do it in my Firestar? I already have about 50
hours in it. Has anyone else been through this scenario? There isnt any
taildragger available for rental anywhere near me.
2. Does anyone on the list have his FSII set up as a two seater? If
so, do you have any difficulty flying at full gross? Im a little nervous
about the extra weight on the 5 spar.
Thanks for all the information so far.
I installed the vortex generators as suggested by some of the listers and
dropped my stall speed by 6 mph. Fantastic! I was very pleased because Im
really most interested in the low, slow, short grass strip type of flying.
So far the FSII has not disappointed.
Thanks for any help,
Ken
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Quality of the older Rotax 582 |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: JUDD LYNN <juddlynn@sbcglobal.net>
I've recently purchased a Mk III with an older 582
(not bluehead). The seller claims it hasn't been run
in 5 years but ran great at that time. Rebuilding it
will cost nearly $3k. I'm wondering if anyone has any
advice about the service record of this engine. Was
the bluehead a big improvement? Should I scrap it and
go to a bluehead or even a 912? Thanks.
Judd Lynn
Los Angeles, CA
Firestar
Mk III
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Quality of the older Rotax 582 |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
| go to a bluehead or even a 912? Thanks.
|
| Judd Lynn
| Los Angeles, CA
| Firestar
| Mk III
Hi Judd/Gang:
Good to hear from you.
Sell the 582 and buy a 912. You saw them fly out of Monument Valley,
and nearly 6,000 feet ASL. The reliability, economy (912 burns 4 gph
at 5,000 cruise)(582 burns 5 to 5.5 gph at 5,800 rpm cruise). 912
also gets 200 hours on a set of plugs and uses 3 qts of oil every 100
hours plus a $3.00 oil filter.
But.............reliability is the name of the game for me. I fly for
fun, but gravity doesn't differentiate between fun flying and flying
for a living, and the ground is just as hard.
john h
MKIII/912ULS
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New Kolber in Lancaster, SC |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: HShack@aol.com
In a message dated 9/12/2005 8:28:10 PM Eastern Standard Time,
kenharrison@ubgcharlotte.com writes:
Hello all,
My name is Ken Harrison. I live in Lancaster, SC. Ive been lurking for
a couple months
I just bought a Kolb Firestar II from Bruce Harrison, my brother
Nice bird.
It'll carry your kids [unless you and them are jumbo's].
You should go to the Carolina Carolina Sport Flyers Fly-In on 10-22. There
will be a bunch of us from the Trenton Flyers there [4 or 5 Kobs, a couple of
Ch*********].
Check out our website at www.trentonflyers.com. Click on "bulletin board".
Your email address was too long to mail you direct.
do not archive
Howard Shackleford
FS II
SC
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Mike Pierzina <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com>
Hi,
I think you need the 7 rib wings for 2 seater FSII
Gotta Fly...
Mike in
MN
Do not archive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Does anyone on the list have his FSII set up as a two seater? If
so, do you have any difficulty flying at full gross? Im a little nervous
about the extra weight on the 5 spar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My Web Site:
http://www.geocities.com/planecrazzzy/Planecrazzzy.html
Sometimes you just have to take the leap and build your wings on the way down...
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Quality of the older Rotax 582 |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
If memory serves me right (!?!) - (HAH) the main difference is the blue
head has ceramic seals behind the water pump, and it also has dual
thermostats in the head so that you cannot readily cold shock the engine,
however cold shock can be avoided by thinking before firewalling. Just warm
it up to operating temp on the ground and never go to full power when the
water temp is below 130 and it should do ok.
There may be other variations, but those are all I know of.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
do not archive
At 05:36 PM 9/12/05 -0700, you wrote:
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: JUDD LYNN <juddlynn@sbcglobal.net>
>
>I've recently purchased a Mk III with an older 582
>(not bluehead). The seller claims it hasn't been run
>in 5 years but ran great at that time. Rebuilding it
>will cost nearly $3k. I'm wondering if anyone has any
>advice about the service record of this engine. Was
>the bluehead a big improvement? Should I scrap it and
>go to a bluehead or even a 912? Thanks.
>
>Judd Lynn
>Los Angeles, CA
>Firestar
>Mk III
>
>
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Engine problem - follow up |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "woody" <duesouth@govital.net>
> One thing I forgot to mention was that with the prop off, the engine runs
fine. As soon as I load it up with a prop the troubles begin - but not all
the time.
I think you have just proven the trouble is in the gear box. Try the new
damper springs in the gear box and if it isn't the problem I will give you
some Canadian beer and a cuban cigar at the Kolb homecoming.
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | New Kolber in Lancaster, SC |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot2@comcast.net>
Ken and All,
>>1. I have a Private Pilots license but do not have a taildragger
endorsement.
If I register the FSII, will I need to get an endorsement?
Answer: Yes, FAR 91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument flight
and certain flight tests.
(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon)
that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully
functioning dual controls.
>>If I do, is there any way I can do it in my Firestar?
Answer: No, the FireStar can't be used. See first answer, aircraft must have
dual controls.
>>I already have about 50 hours in it. Has anyone else been through this
scenario? There isn't any
taildragger available for rental anywhere near me.
Answer: You have to find the taildragger and the CFI. Check with your local
FBO's.
>>2. Does anyone on the list have his FSII set up as a two seater? If so,
do you have any difficulty flying at full gross? I'm a little nervous about
the extra weight on the 5 spar.
Answer: Several are flying with the jump seat. More important is "at what
gross weight are you wanting to fly at" and do you have a "five rib wing or
a seven rib wing?"
Another question is "what engine are you wanting to fly two people under?"
John Williamson
Arlington, TX
Kolb Kolbra, Rotax 912ULS, 916 hours
http://home.comcast.net/~kolbrapilot1
kolbrapilot2@comcast.net
do not archive
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Suzuki Turbo G10 Weigh-In |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Richard Swiderski" <rswiderski@earthlink.net>
Well, I finally assembled my engine & weighed it & mounted it on the Kolb
SlingShot. It came in at 169 lbs, with an 8 lb flywheel & 30lb SPG-2
redrive, distributorless ignition, port injected, intercooled &
turbocharged. It has 107 lbs of torque & puts out 100hp @ 8.6 lb boost. I
posted pics in the file section of FlyGeo_uncensored@yahoogroups.com along
with the post below. .Richard Swiderski
More details of this engine can be seen at
http://www.geocities.com/ib2polish/
The target weight has been 175 lbs & I just weighed it with intercooler
not shown, wire harness not included & radiator with hoses not yet included.
It came in at 169 pounds, so I will be very close.
Weight items of note:
1) OEM intake manifold, tuned intake chamber & 1/3 of throttle body was
discarded (14.3 lbs) & replaced with 2.2 lb modified intake & thermostat
housing from nonturbo G10 for weight saving of 8.7 lbs.
2) Lighter starter saved 2.7 lbs.
3) Discarded OEM alternator (7.1lbs all ready a few pounds lighter than
some G10 alternators) for a 4.1 lb John Deere 20A Dynamo for a weight saving
of 2.4lb
4) Discarded distributor (2.8lb); air mass sensor (2.5lb); OEM ignition
coil (1.8lb); single groove crank pulley (2.6lb); & replaced with a Tracy
Crook distributorless ignition system using 25% smaller aluminum crank
pulley with 6" trigger wheel 3 corvette ignition coils
(2.3lb) for a net gain of 4.7lb.
5) Discarded OEM oil pan for one that allows engine to sit 4" lower on bed
mount & hang 4" behind Kolb engine mount, for a net gain of 1.4lb. This was
done when I was using a Raven redrive. Now however, I am using the SPG-2 &
it hangs out 4-5" further back than the Raven. This may not be acceptable
as it might move the cg too far back. A cg weight analysis with engine now
mounted will soon tell. Worst case scenario is I'll need to make another
oil pan.
6) I added a .67lb crank scraper.
7) I discarded the OEM cast iron exhaust manifold (lost the weight numbers
on it) & replaced it with a stainless steel manifold (3.6lb)that moved the
turbo from the right center/rear to in front of engine. This is lighter &
moved cg of engine forward. I also lightened the turbo exhaust housing a
forgotten amount.
8) I discarded the SPG-2 flexplate (2.9lb) & used an 8lb flywheel.
9) The SPG-2 weighs 30lbs. (not including flexplate or flywheel)
10) The 3/8" aluminum engine mounts (about 4.5 lbs)used to adapt engine to
Kolb flatbed is included in this weight as well.
Total weight savings from an OEM Suzuki turbo G10 is at least 16.43lb
plus a couple pounds on exhaust system. I do believe this is the lightest
G10 turbo to date.
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: A message from John Cleese |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
At 10:12 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote:
>Sigh....
>----- Original Message ----- Subject: Fw: A message from John Cleese
>> > A Message from John Cleese
I'm gonna save that one to read when I'm not intoxicated.
-However------- For your entertainment.
.... we had a fine time flyin into McCollum Airport and Car Show
Saturday (Kennesaw).
They have a "Tower" and we were flying everything from a "Breezy to a Gryo".
3rd busiest airport in Georgia. Our President is a girl - sorta like
"Wendy" in Peter Pan.
She can get away with anything. I'm sure we looked like a swarm of
mosquitoes flying in
amoust the jets. Hell, we had a low level flyby and then a right
hand pattern to land.
Haaa......... we just barely had it under control coming straight
in. Can you imagine what happened
when the tower told us to do a low pass and a "Right Hand Pattern" to
land! 18 Ultralights 500 feet apart
and we were not allowed to talk to the tower/Air Boss- just listen
and not allowed to talk to each other off channel.
Only "Wendy" was allowed to talk, and she thought it was great. We
had "Titans" landing long
over the top of "Phantoms" that landed short because of the Gryos,
........"Chinese FireDrill"
I love it!!! They think it was great.
Hello GSFA Members,
I thought that it would be good to share this with you. Thanks for a
GREAT time flying to McCollum we did good, they loved it. I bet we
get invited again one day. Read below what the Air Boss had to say about ;us.
GSFA / Pres.
Kim Arrowood
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Ulrich [mailto:ulrich6@bellsouth.net]
Subject: Re: McCollum Aircraft and Car Show
Kim:
What can I say............you were all great! Thank you for coming,
I'll never forget the view to the west of the runway with 18
ultralights inbound for landing.........that was classic!
Hell, what can I say/.
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: A message from John Cleese |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
At 12:25 AM 9/13/2005, you wrote:
>--> Kolb-List message posted by: possums <possums@mindspring.com>
>
>At 10:12 PM 9/12/2005, you wrote:
> >Sigh....
> >----- Original Message ----- Subject: Fw: A message from John Cleese
> >> > A Message from John Cleese
Ooops - sorry bout that
Do Not archive.
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net>
68 inch diameter Powerfin on a 690L-70 engine that is raised up about an
inch and 5/8 above the stock position via custom made engine mount.
Over an inch of boom clearance.
Denny Rowe, Mk-3 , PA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave & Eve Pelletier" <pelletier@cableone.net>
Subject: Kolb-List: Prop Size
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Dave & Eve Pelletier"
> <pelletier@cableone.net>
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> I'm getting a Warp Drive prop to replace my IVO. The IVO is a 64" prop
> but the Warp people tell me that Kolb MK III's with 582's can handle a 66"
> prop. I measured and the distance from the hub center to the tube and it
> is 33 5/8" which means a 66" prop would only give me 5/8" clearance.
> Kinda close to my way of thinking. What're you MKIII Classic guys using?
>
> AzDave
>
>
> --
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|