Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:20 AM - Re: Mark III vs Kolbra (lucien stavenhagen)
2. 10:53 AM - Glenn Rinck (John Hauck)
3. 03:10 PM - float flying (russ kinne)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mark III vs Kolbra |
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "lucien stavenhagen" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
John, all,
Speaking of this - I"m following this thread since the Kolbra is at the
moment at the top of the list of planes that will be my next plane...
A question about the Kolbra - can it be built without any flaps or flaperons
at all? I.e. only the aileron setup like the Firestar? I'm just curious
here, as I really like the simplicity of the ailerons-only setup with my
Firestar. Though true flaps are nice to have... Just wondering....
By the way, I made some slightly more permanant gap seals for my FS
yesterday out of the clear plastic packing tape - very nice actually and
adds no perceptable drag to the operation of the control surafaces. I did
add gap seals to the elevator and rudder, but it didn't seem to make a lot
of difference. I do think there's slightly more authority in both at the
extremes of deflection though...
LS
N646F
do not archive
>Morning David K/All:
>
>Basically, the same aircraft, same wing and tail section. Seems like
>the tailboom is longer, but can not say for sure. Major difference is
>tandem versus side by side seating. The Kolbra will cruise faster
>than the MKIII with the same engine and prop because of the narrower
>profile. However, the Kolbra can not be configured like the MKIII to
>provide much more cargo space. In addition, the MKIII has a built in
>flight desk, the second seat that is not occupied. There have to be a
>few changes to the MKIII to gain the additional cargo room, e.g., move
>fuel tank to upper area behind the bulkhead that is normally open and
>not used. This opens up the lower area where the original fuel tanks
>were for cargo.
>
>As far as handling, the Kolbra seems to me to be a bit more docile
>than the MKIII, which is also a docile handling airplane like all the
>other Kolb models, new and older. Also some of the adverse yaw and
>pitch attitude problems experienced with the MKIII seem to be gone.
>These observations are based on only a short period of flight in two
>different Kolbras, one 582 and the other 912 powered.
>
>One additional item is the flaps on the MKIII, which are a definite
>plus. The standard Kolbra does come with a standard flap setup.
>However, Paul P is building a Kolbra that has full flaps like the
>MKIII. We'll have to wait until Paul's airplane flies to see how well
>they perform. I am sure they will be a welcome addition to the
>already good flying Kolbra.
>
>I think it is a toss up of whether one wants tandem or side by side
>seating. I like both and would certainly own a Kolbra if I didn't
>already have a good MKIII.
>
>Take care,
>
>john h
>MKIII,912ULS
>hauck's holler, alabama
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
Hi Gang:
Other day sent a msg that indicated Glen Rinck lived in Grand Ridge,
NJ. Was a "senior moment" mistake. Should have read Grand Ridge,
Florida.
Thanks,
john h
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Kolb-List message posted by: russ kinne <kinnepix@earthlink.net>
List, I apologize -- I made some misleading statements.
Let me add that ON NAVIGABLE WATERS the Coast Guard is in charge of
seaplanes while they're on the water. Obviously on a land-bound lake
there's no CG and the local laws will be in effect. And as Steve B
pointed out, the local lawman may not realize that when a seaplane
stops, it WILL weathercock into the wind, right now too, no matter what
else happens. So he should know that it's inadvisable to command a
pilot to stop when it could cause damage, collisions, etc. Hopefully
the local officer will learn at least a little about the watercraft
he's trying to control.
Russ Kinne
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|