---------------------------------------------------------- Kolb-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Fri 12/30/05: 14 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 03:43 AM - stuff for sale (Ted Cowan) 2. 08:02 AM - Re: HKS on a FS11 (John Jung) 3. 08:38 AM - Re: Re: HKS on a FS11 (robert bean) 4. 09:44 AM - Re: Kolb-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 12/29/05 (b young) 5. 10:52 AM - Re: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 12/29/05 (Robert Laird) 6. 02:19 PM - 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke (Michael Bigelow) 7. 02:44 PM - Re: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke (Beauford) 8. 05:04 PM - HKS on a FS11 (Edward Steuber) 9. 05:29 PM - Re: Re: Tie downs, gust locks (Robert Noyer) 10. 05:41 PM - EIS (bryan green) 11. 06:08 PM - Re: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke (lucien stavenhagen) 12. 06:35 PM - Re: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke (Ed Chmielewski) 13. 07:49 PM - Re: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke (WillUribe@aol.com) 14. 08:26 PM - Re: Re: HKS on a FS11 (WillUribe@aol.com) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 03:43:51 AM PST US From: Ted Cowan Subject: Kolb-List: stuff for sale --> Kolb-List message posted by: Ted Cowan Hope everyone had a great Christmas and are ready to have a tremendous New Year. Gotta ring the bell for John Hauck's Brother, Jim. He is apparently getting out of the aircraft industry and wants to give us a deal. Go see the For Sale page of our web site at: www.homestead.com/southernflyers Click on the 'for sale' section and check it out. Yes, all of that for four grand. He will be having a lot of other stuff also. Great guy. I am sure you will get a deal. Might want to check out the rest of the web site also. I am the web master and I try my best. You all take care out there. If you are building a Kolb and need this stuff, you gotta real bargain listed. Happy Holidays!! Ted Cowan, Alabama ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 08:02:04 AM PST US From: John Jung Subject: Kolb-List: RE: HKS on a FS11 --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung Will and Group, Will, too bad you only read some on the posts. You missed my point. I started this thread and the reason that I am considering the HKS is not because of reliability. My 503 has been fantastically reliable for 200 hours. It is to increase the range and cruise speed. And, I know that because of your long trip with a 503, you could still say "Who needs more range?". But it is something that I would like to have. John Jung Firestar II N6163J Surprise, AZ ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 08:38:27 AM PST US From: robert bean Subject: Re: Kolb-List: RE: HKS on a FS11 --> Kolb-List message posted by: robert bean John, I think you should go for it, if for no other reason than that we have no Kolb experience with one (at least on the list). There have been some Verners. Everyone likes to save money but seeing how many builders shell out the long $$$ for the 912 I don't figure why anyone would rule out an engine at roughly half that price. The advantage over an automotive conversion is the time and labor saved, as several of us can attest. -BB do not archive On 30, Dec 2005, at 11:01 AM, John Jung wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung > > Will and Group, > > Will, too bad you only read some on the posts. You missed my point. I > started this thread and the reason that I am considering the HKS is not > because of reliability. My 503 has been fantastically reliable for 200 > hours. It is to increase the range and cruise speed. And, I know that > because of your long trip with a 503, you could still say "Who needs > more range?". But it is something that I would like to have. > > John Jung > Firestar II N6163J > Surprise, AZ > > ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 09:44:37 AM PST US From: "b young" Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 12/29/05 --> Kolb-List message posted by: "b young" Dave I purchased my NAVMAN from Boaters world also but I told another guy about NAVMAN and he got one cheaper than I did but there worth every nickle you pay for it no matter what it is You can Go to the navman Website @ (NAVMAN.com) click on Products,Marine,fuel solutions and from there you can locate a distributor and there price --------------------------------- i bought the prinston fuel probe.. and it feeds into one of the aux. inputs to the EIS. it is set up to read in 1/10 of gallons. and is programable to be accurate at empty, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, full. the eis will even flash the master warning light when the fuel level reaches a programable limit. boyd ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 10:52:19 AM PST US From: Robert Laird Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 12 Msgs - 12/29/05 --> Kolb-List message posted by: Robert Laird On 12/30/05, b young wrote: > i bought the prinston fuel probe.. and it feeds into one of the aux. inputs > to the EIS. it is set up to read in 1/10 of gallons. and is programable > to be accurate at empty, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, full. the eis will even flash the > master warning light when the fuel level reaches a programable limit. Boyd -- Which EIS is that? And where did you get the "prinston" fuel probe? -- Robert do not archive ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 02:19:17 PM PST US From: "Michael Bigelow" Subject: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Michael Bigelow" " My 2 stroke has worked fine all these years... I will stick with the reliable 2 stroke Rotax 503 " That is a pretty dangerous attitude to have. Just because some have beat the odds so far does not mean that the 2 stroke is a realiable engine, it just means that you have have had the skill and a certain amount of luck to keep your 2 stroke running. I flew one of the first weight shit Quicksilvers with a 10 HP Chrysler 2 stroke engine on it, which never gave me a problem... That being said, I never forgot what I had, an engine with a horrible record of quitting and I always respected it as such. 2 Strokes have improved vastly since then, but they are still 2 stroke engines and they dont even compare to 4 strokes reliability wise... Never forget it. Dirt Bikes, boats, even lawn equpment is being made with more expensive 4 stroke engines, because they are simply better. I ride cross country on my dirt bike, and I would not even consider going cross country on a 2 stroke bike. I am even less willing to fly over trees, terrain, etc with a 2 stroke engine in my ultralight. The 4 stroke engines are expensive, but they are well worth the extra money. If you look at the increased fuel and oil usage, the continual maintenance and rebuilds, if you fly a lot, the 4 stroke eventaully pays for itself over time. For that moment when the 2 stroke quits unexpectedly, the 4 stroke pays for itself instantly. I know that 16,000 for a 912-s or 8,000 for the HKS is a lot of money, but if this is the hobby you enjoy and you fly alot, it is worth doing whatever it takes to get the best engine you can. I have worked more extra days than I can shake a stick at to afford my 912, but it is well worth it. I love to fly, and there was a time I could not possibly afford a 4 storke engine, and in that case I flew 2 strokes rather than walk (that was a Joke :) I am willing to take risks in pursuit of what I love to do, but I never never forgot the fact that my 2 stroke was an engine that would quit at any moment. I think we should always honest with ourselves and others about 2 strokes, tell newcomers that they are not reliable, that they are much more likely to quit than a 4 storke, and let each person make an intelligent choice based on the type of flying they do. We are doing a great disservice to everyone by giving others a false sense of security by saying " 2 strokes are reliable, I have never had a problem with mine". Just because some have beat the odds does not change the fact that 2 stroke engines are substandard in realiability, and that one day they will quit at the worst possible time. Michael A. Bigelow Do Not Archive ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 02:44:17 PM PST US From: "Beauford" Subject: Re: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Beauford" Right on, Mike... Although, due to its' impeccable service history, I'd fly my 447 into the teeth of hell itself... or, if pressed, at least to the city limits of Sebring.... Beauford, the Aluminum Butcher of Brandon FF #076 Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bigelow" Subject: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Michael Bigelow" > > " My 2 stroke has worked fine all these years... I will stick with the > reliable 2 stroke Rotax 503 " > > That is a pretty dangerous attitude to have. Just because some have beat > the odds so far does not mean that the 2 stroke is a realiable engine, it > just means that you have have had the skill and a certain amount of luck to > keep your 2 stroke running. I flew one of the first weight shit > Quicksilvers with a 10 HP Chrysler 2 stroke engine on it, which never gave > me a problem... That being said, I never forgot what I had, an engine with a > horrible record of quitting and I always respected it as such. 2 Strokes > have improved vastly since then, but they are still 2 stroke engines and > they dont even compare to 4 strokes reliability wise... Never forget it. > > Dirt Bikes, boats, even lawn equpment is being made with more expensive 4 > stroke engines, because they are simply better. I ride cross country on my > dirt bike, and I would not even consider going cross country on a 2 stroke > bike. I am even less willing to fly over trees, terrain, etc with a 2 > stroke engine in my ultralight. The 4 stroke engines are expensive, but > they are well worth the extra money. If you look at the increased fuel and > oil usage, the continual maintenance and rebuilds, if you fly a lot, the 4 > stroke eventaully pays for itself over time. For that moment when the 2 > stroke quits unexpectedly, the 4 stroke pays for itself instantly. I know > that 16,000 for a 912-s or 8,000 for the HKS is a lot of money, but if this > is the hobby you enjoy and you fly alot, it is worth doing whatever it takes > to get the best engine you can. I have worked more extra days than I can > shake a stick at to afford my 912, but it is well worth it. I love to fly, > and there was a time I could not possibly afford a 4 storke engine, and in > that case I flew 2 strokes rather than walk (that was a Joke :) I am > willing to take risks in pursuit of what I love to do, but I never never > forgot the fact that my 2 stroke was an engine that would quit at any > moment. I think we should always honest with ourselves and others about 2 > strokes, tell newcomers that they are not reliable, that they are much more > likely to quit than a 4 storke, and let each person make an intelligent > choice based on the type of flying they do. We are doing a great disservice > to everyone by giving others a false sense of security by saying " 2 strokes > are reliable, I have never had a problem with mine". Just because some > have beat the odds does not change the fact that 2 stroke engines are > substandard in realiability, and that one day they will quit at the worst > possible time. > > Michael A. Bigelow > > Do Not Archive > > ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 05:04:31 PM PST US From: "Edward Steuber" Subject: Kolb-List: HKS on a FS11 --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Edward Steuber" The main reason I did not like the speed of the Ultrastar was because it did not go as slow as I was used to on the previous stock Ultrastar I owned before this one. I really liked the 60 mph speed . Pulling the throttle back did slow the latest one down , but then the engine was not happy at 4800...something to do with the mid-range of the carburetor that would not be adjusted. I also feel the engine should be run at 5400 for keeping the engine "healthy"..... 2 strokes like higher RPM s. The higher speed on these light airframes could be a disaster waiting to happen....want to find out ? No Thanks ! Besides , if you want to go fast , buy a standard category airplane ....plenty of them on the market cause so many pilots are either giving up or going to ultralights cause of operating costs...I have a Traveler (early Cheetah) that got 3 hours on it last year and 2 Cassutt Racers that need to be completed but have been neglected cause I'm having too much fun with the UL's. Got a taildragger CGS Hawk that is almost ready for covering, too ! Guess which project is getting my attention first ? The Navman can be bought for a little under $130 if you do a search using Navman fuel ....Haven't used mine yet but Ellery in Maine loves his...the thing I like about it is I can add another tank for cross countrys and just select the higher capacity without adding sensors to the extra tank...the thing I don't like is that you won't know if you have a leak in the system (forward of the transducer) until the engine quits from fuel starvation.......but if you have a tank that is impossible to gauge , then this may be the answer... Ed in Western NY ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 05:29:26 PM PST US From: Robert Noyer Subject: Re: Kolb-List: RE: Tie downs, gust locks --> Kolb-List message posted by: Robert Noyer Although I can't hold a candle to Ray's tale of The Tree-Toppin' Tin Lizzie, I have another True Tie-down Tale. Friend bought a Sw 2-32 sailplane, sight unseen, but with "only little damage on roll-out." He was in N. VA, plane in Plymouth MA. This should have given the buyer a clue...Plymouth, as in ROCK! Ok, he arrives about dusk and is shown to an unlit hangar. Wings off, canvas over nose and canopy. Hand shake, the two go out for drinks and dinner. And drinks, repeat as necessary. Early AM the wounded bird is lashed down, fore and aft, Silverado ready to make turns for 55 mph. Coupla days later The Grey Baron is consulted on making the passel of parts airworthy. The corpse was laid out in an unheated 3-car garage. It was December. COLD. After some 3 hrs I had surveyed this mess: nose cone needed extensive FG work, canopy needed trashing, rt. wing needed new LE 3/4 way to tip, and best of all the rt. spar was buckeled. I think it had hit Plymouth Rock on the off-field roll-out. Young owner was a nice kid, no money. I offered to trade him my work for some of his. He had a house washing biz. I needed a 2 car port enclosed. By May I got an IA to sign my Mech rating work off. House looked better, Garage looked good. Sailplane taken to soaring field some 50 mi away, and tied down using 1/4 a/c cables tied to three half oil drums filled with concrete and sunk level. Before I could get ride, a spring T'storm waltzed through the field, broke one wing tie down cable, rolled the plane, pulled the other drum outa the sod, flopped around some more, and the loose weighted drum falls back down, Right Though The Repaired Wing. Ins. paid $8000. Guess who didn't get a COLD dollar? And there was a whole 29 min logged after repair. Bob N. do not archive ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 05:41:15 PM PST US From: bryan green Subject: Kolb-List: EIS --> Kolb-List message posted by: bryan green I got mine from Grand Rapids Technology Robert the link is http://www.grtavionics.com/ Bryan Green Elgin SC Do not archive Robert Laird wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: Robert Laird > >On 12/30/05, b young wrote: > > >>i bought the prinston fuel probe.. and it feeds into one of the aux. inputs >>to the EIS. it is set up to read in 1/10 of gallons. and is programable >>to be accurate at empty, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, full. the eis will even flash the >>master warning light when the fuel level reaches a programable limit. >> >> > >Boyd -- > >Which EIS is that? And where did you get the "prinston" fuel probe? > > -- Robert > >do not archive > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ Message 11 ____________________________________ Time: 06:08:28 PM PST US From: "lucien stavenhagen" Subject: RE: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: "lucien stavenhagen" > I think we should always honest with ourselves and others about 2 >strokes, tell newcomers that they are not reliable, that they are much more >likely to quit than a 4 storke, and let each person make an intelligent >choice based on the type of flying they do. We are doing a great >disservice >to everyone by giving others a false sense of security by saying " 2 >strokes >are reliable, I have never had a problem with mine". Just because some >have beat the odds does not change the fact that 2 stroke engines are >substandard in realiability, and that one day they will quit at the worst >possible time. Ok can't let this one go. A sense of responsibility to newcomers and others is admirable, but it ceases to be so when it involves spreading misinformation like this. To wit, "Substandard in reliablity", "beat the odds" and "not reliable" are simply false and uninformed statements to make about our modern 2-strokes, particularly the Rotax motors. This has been confirmed by decades of field experience with the Rotaxen, particularly the 447 and 503. In fact, if there's anything we can say for certain about the reliability of the 2-stroke, it is that the strengths and weaknesses of them are very well known and confirmed by field experience. Knowledge is the key to keeping the prop cranking with ANY motor, not just a 2-stroke. Just so happens, regarding the Rotax motors, we know how to - prop them - jet them - run them - maintain them - install them - fix them. We know what works generally and what doesn't work with them and we know how to work around the weaknesses and exploit the strengths. In other words, reliability is actually a complicated combination of motor quality and operator intervention. But for sure our Rotaxen do a very reliable job of cranking props on airplanes for 100's of hours AND that's NOT the result of accident. It's because of the knowledge we have about them as I alluded to above. I'm living proof, having flown 2-strokes for years now without problems and trust me I don't even own a pair of dice! LS N646F >Michael A. Bigelow > >Do Not Archive > > ________________________________ Message 12 ____________________________________ Time: 06:35:20 PM PST US From: "Ed Chmielewski" Subject: Re: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ed Chmielewski" Hi Mike, I think you're overstating the unreliability of 2-strokes, especially those made since the mid-80's. They tend to be as reliable as the operator makes them (fresh fuel, correct mix and needle settings, etc.). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bigelow" Subject: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Michael Bigelow" > > > " My 2 stroke has worked fine all these years... I will stick with the > reliable 2 stroke Rotax 503 " > > That is a pretty dangerous attitude to have. Just because some have beat > the odds so far does not mean that the 2 stroke is a realiable engine, it > just means that you have have had the skill and a certain amount of luck > to > keep your 2 stroke running. I tend to think we make our own luck, by how careful (or not) we are. I've had 4 4-stroke (GA) engine failures in 29 years/12K+ hours. All were mechanical, internal failures. Do I think all 4-stroke engines are faulty? Nah. Do I trust them blindly? Nah. > Dirt Bikes, boats, even lawn equpment is being made with more expensive 4 stroke engines, because they are simply better. I think the clean-air laws have more to do with it than anything else. > I ride cross country on my > dirt bike, and I would not even consider going cross country on a 2 stroke > bike. I had more problems with a Honda 305 Scrambler than a Yamaha 250. That thing wouldn't die! > For that moment when the 2 > stroke quits unexpectedly, the 4 stroke pays for itself instantly. But what if the 4-stroke quits unexpectedly? Call the mfgr. and complain on the way down? I am > willing to take risks in pursuit of what I love to do, but I never never > forgot the fact that my 2 stroke was an engine that would quit at any > moment. Then why fly with it, if it's that unsafe? Just because some > have beat the odds does not change the fact that 2 stroke engines are > substandard in realiability, and that one day they will quit at the worst > possible time. Ther's never an opportune time, be they 2-stroke, 4-stroke, Wankel, turbine, or rocket. I might even argue your points promote complacency around the use of 4-strokes. (What, me worry?). I think the reliability issues (talking about Rotax) have had much more to due with operator error than inherent, by-design unreliability. How about the snowmobiles used in the Arctic where people trust them with their lives daily, or the PWC on the lake? Just two extremes... I also fly RC, where 2-strokes are the rule and 4-strokes the minority. I fly both, and find I can mess either up equally well if not paying attention. Just MHO. Ed in JXN MkII/503 Do not archive. ________________________________ Message 13 ____________________________________ Time: 07:49:15 PM PST US From: WillUribe@aol.com Subject: RE: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: WillUribe@aol.com Hola Mike, You Sir are a scare monger, to allude that a 4 stroke is some mystical, magical engine that will always keep you in the air is false. Luck or beating the odds has nothing to do with it. Like I said, If you don't take care of your engine it will not take care of you. I hope you haven't stopped looking for emergency landing spots just because your flying with a Rotax 912s. I do it all the time, even when flying the Cessna, and I never forget an engine, any engine, may quit at any time. Sad to say a Rotax 912 engine may quit at the worst possible time just as fast as a Rotax 503. It doesn't matter why this 912 quit, it did quit and at the worst possible time. _http://members.aol.com/willuribe/912.jpg_ (http://members.aol.com/willuribe/912.jpg) One of these days I will sell my FireStar and build me a Kolbra or a MK III and I will install a 4 stroke (maybe when I win the lotto). But right now I'm having too much fun with my little 2 stroke powered FireStar. Regards, Will Uribe El Paso, TX FireStar II N4GU C-172 N2506U Restoring a PA-22-108 N4551Z _http://home.elp.rr.com/airplane_ (http://home.elp.rr.com/airplane) Do Not Archive BTW: Any Kolbers in Des Moines, Iowa? -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bigelow Subject: Kolb-List: 2 Stroke VS 4 Stroke --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Michael Bigelow" " My 2 stroke has worked fine all these years... I will stick with the reliable 2 stroke Rotax 503 " That is a pretty dangerous attitude to have. Just because some have beat the odds so far does not mean that the 2 stroke is a realiable engine, it just means that you have have had the skill and a certain amount of luck to keep your 2 stroke running. I flew one of the first weight shit Quicksilvers with a 10 HP Chrysler 2 stroke engine on it, which never gave me a problem... That being said, I never forgot what I had, an engine with a horrible record of quitting and I always respected it as such. 2 Strokes have improved vastly since then, but they are still 2 stroke engines and they dont even compare to 4 strokes reliability wise... Never forget it. Dirt Bikes, boats, even lawn equpment is being made with more expensive 4 stroke engines, because they are simply better. I ride cross country on my dirt bike, and I would not even consider going cross country on a 2 stroke bike. I am even less willing to fly over trees, terrain, etc with a 2 stroke engine in my ultralight. The 4 stroke engines are expensive, but they are well worth the extra money. If you look at the increased fuel and oil usage, the continual maintenance and rebuilds, if you fly a lot, the 4 stroke eventaully pays for itself over time. For that moment when the 2 stroke quits unexpectedly, the 4 stroke pays for itself instantly. I know that 16,000 for a 912-s or 8,000 for the HKS is a lot of money, but if this is the hobby you enjoy and you fly alot, it is worth doing whatever it takes to get the best engine you can. I have worked more extra days than I can shake a stick at to afford my 912, but it is well worth it. I love to fly, and there was a time I could not possibly afford a 4 storke engine, and in that case I flew 2 strokes rather than walk (that was a Joke :) I am willing to take risks in pursuit of what I love to do, but I never never forgot the fact that my 2 stroke was an engine that would quit at any moment. I think we should always honest with ourselves and others about 2 strokes, tell newcomers that they are not reliable, that they are much more likely to quit than a 4 storke, and let each person make an intelligent choice based on the type of flying they do. We are doing a great disservice to everyone by giving others a false sense of security by saying " 2 strokes are reliable, I have never had a problem with mine". Just because some have beat the odds does not change the fact that 2 stroke engines are substandard in realiability, and that one day they will quit at the worst possible time. Michael A. Bigelow Do Not Archive ________________________________ Message 14 ____________________________________ Time: 08:26:02 PM PST US From: WillUribe@aol.com Subject: RE: Kolb-List: RE: HKS on a FS11 --> Kolb-List message posted by: WillUribe@aol.com Hi John, I'm guilt as charged, I have not been keeping up with all the posts. I too would love to have more range. On our long trip, one time, we had to walk for miles to get some fuel. But I would rather sell my FireStar and build me a Kolbra or a MK III. It's just hard to believe the HKS costs as much as what I paid for my FireStar kit. Regards, Will Uribe El Paso, TX FireStar II N4GU C-172 N2506U Restoring a PA-22-108 N4551Z _http://home.elp.rr.com/airplane_ (http://home.elp.rr.com/airplane) Do Not Archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Jung Subject: Kolb-List: RE: HKS on a FS11 --> Kolb-List message posted by: John Jung Will and Group, Will, too bad you only read some on the posts. You missed my point. I started this thread and the reason that I am considering the HKS is not because of reliability. My 503 has been fantastically reliable for 200 hours. It is to increase the range and cruise speed. And, I know that because of your long trip with a 503, you could still say "Who needs more range?". But it is something that I would like to have. John Jung Firestar II N6163J Surprise, AZ