Kolb-List Digest Archive

Wed 01/18/06


Total Messages Posted: 24



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:08 AM - Re: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (Ed Chmielewski)
     2. 04:10 AM - props (Ted Cowan)
     3. 04:28 AM - Re: Re: VG's (pat ladd)
     4. 05:36 AM - Re: Overreving 582 (Jack B. Hart)
     5. 06:14 AM - Re: Overreving 582 (Denny Rowe)
     6. 07:26 AM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (JetPilot)
     7. 08:27 AM - Re: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (snuffy@usol.com)
     8. 08:30 AM - Opportunity to Comment: Light Sport Amphibs... (David.Lehman)
     9. 10:27 AM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (jimhefner)
    10. 10:34 AM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL)
    11. 10:47 AM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (David.Lehman)
    12. 11:55 AM - VW powered Kolbs... (Jeremy Casey)
    13. 12:21 PM - Firefly pictures... (Jeremy Casey)
    14. 01:13 PM - Wind vs. Ultrastar (David Kulp)
    15. 01:48 PM - Re: Overreving 582 (Jim Ballenger)
    16. 02:02 PM - Re: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (mike moulai)
    17. 02:35 PM - Re: Wind vs. Ultrastar (robert bean)
    18. 02:36 PM - Re: VW powered Kolbs... (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
    19. 02:45 PM - Re: VW powered Kolbs... (John Hauck)
    20. 06:21 PM - Mark III on floats (Diego Ospina)
    21. 06:34 PM - Re: Mark III on floats (Larry Bourne)
    22. 08:27 PM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (Don G)
    23. 08:39 PM - Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (JetPilot)
    24. 09:00 PM - Re: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS (Richard Pike)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:08:40 AM PST US
    From: "Ed Chmielewski" <edchmiel@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ed Chmielewski" <edchmiel@mindspring.com> Hi Rev. Pike, I agree. The variety of shapes and configurations for various mfgr's VG's is amazing. I've flown with at least 3 different makes on GA aircraft, mainly Cessna 400-series and Piper twins. Some run parallel down the entire wing, some are on just half the wing, others are paired in 'V' shapes, and some can be found on the bottom of the horizontal stab. They even have directions if a few fall off - just fly the aircraft as if there are no VG's. Some did give a more pronounced stall break, but the over-all improvements in handling were worth the trade-off. Ed in JXN MkII/503 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:43 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS > --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> > > Having played with a variety of vortex generator setups on Kolb wings, > both MKIII and FSII, my experience is exactly the opposite. Nothing > worked worse than stock, everything gave at least some improvement, and > certain arrangements seemed optimum, or at least within my creative > abilities. > > None of it was time lost. None. It was fun experimenting. That's why > they are called "Experimental Aircraft." Because you can have fun > experimenting with them. And if it is a Kolb airfoil, it tolerates > experimenting very well. > > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > JetPilot wrote: > >>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com> >> >>Thats where im ordering mine from ( www.landshorter.com ) >> >>The shape and size of those things has to be critical [Shocked] If you >>made them and got the angles, sizes, etc wrong, I can immagine they didnt >>work very well. Landshorter.com says they tested in the wind tunnel to >>get everything right... For all the research, and optmization they have >>done, 100 bucks is a bargain. Even if I can make the vortex generators >>for free, If I have to spend days and days getting them right, the cost >>becomes huge in time lost. >> >>Also just putting the vortex generators just front of the ailerons only >>covers less than 40 % of the wing. You cannot expect much with just >>covering 40% of the wing... you need to cover the whole thing ! Also the >>distance from the leading edge is critical, if you anyone gets any one of >>these things wrong the results could prove very dissapointing [Evil or >>Very Mad] >> >>Michael A. Bigelow >> >>-------- >>NO FEAR - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have >>!!!


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:10:50 AM PST US
    From: Ted Cowan <trc1917@Direcway.com>
    Subject: props
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Ted Cowan <trc1917@direcway.com> was wondering if anyone has ever made a good comparison between IVO, 64" and a Warp prop of the same length. I am curious as I have an IVO and my buddy has a Warp on his SlingShot. He has better climb, cruise and gas mileage than I do. I am a heavier plane but he is larger in size. Anyone make a direct, try one, take it off and try another type comparison on a Kolb that would compare to the SlingShot? Would be happy to hear. Ted Cowan, Alabama


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:28:02 AM PST US
    From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: VG's
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> Hi, the only way that John is going to be convinced of the efficacy of VG`s is to fit some to his own bird and try it. Kit built planes vary quite a bit in performance depending on the builder and flying one against the other would be a pretty useless exercise. The only way is to fly a single plane, establish a datum, fit the VG`s and fly it and measure again. Cheers Pat do not archive --


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:36:53 AM PST US
    From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Overreving 582
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net> At 01:45 PM 1/17/06 -0500, you wrote: >--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> > >Sounds like an air leak to me. > >Denny >----- Original Message ----- >From: <EnaudZ@aol.com> If not an air leak, check for momentary fuel system constriction problems. Look for water in the bottom of the float bowl, blow out or replace the fuel filter, check fuel pressure, your pump may be marginal for the higher flow rates. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:14:57 AM PST US
    From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net>
    Subject: Re: Overreving 582
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> Jack has a point here, if the fuel pump is not keeping up with demand at full throttle, the float bowel level could be dropping enough to lean the mixture causing the engine to rev slightly. Between the lean burn being hotter and lack of lubricating fuel oil mix this could lead to a seizure on climb out. Not good. Regardless I'll bet its one of the problems mentioned by Earl, Jack or myself, please let us know what you find. Denny ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:39 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Overreving 582 > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net> > > At 01:45 PM 1/17/06 -0500, you wrote: >>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> >> >>Sounds like an air leak to me. >> >>Denny >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: <EnaudZ@aol.com> > > If not an air leak, check for momentary fuel system constriction problems. > Look for water in the bottom of the float bowl, blow out or replace the > fuel > filter, check fuel pressure, your pump may be marginal for the higher flow > rates. > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:00 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com> Sizes and locations of vortex generators are going to be different for each different aircraft. VG's will probably be an improvement no matter what, but to get the OPTIMUM benefit, they need to be of the correct size, shape, and placement on the wing. The vortex generators sold by www.landshorter.com seem to be designed for airplanes close to our size and speed range, so im figuring they are going to get the sizes and shapes closer to optimum than I could by cutting my own. Michael A. Bigelow -------- NO FEAR - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=4979#4979


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:30 AM PST US
    From: snuffy@usol.com
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: snuffy@usol.com > The vortex generators sold by www.landshorter.com seem to be designed for airplanes close to our size and speed range, Have they actually designed them for a Kolb and if so are the test results available and verifiable from an unbiased source? Do not archive


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:30:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Opportunity to Comment: Light Sport Amphibs...
    From: "David.Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "David.Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net> Received this from the SPA this morning... This affects Kolbs on amphibs too... Seaplane Pilots Association to david More options 8:19 am (5 minutes ago) Dear Members: ** Comments due this coming Tuesday, January 24, 2006 ** A petition by Czech Aircraft Works for exemption from current Light Sport rules opens a new opportunity for members to encourage the FAA to accept amphibious landing gear on light sport aircraft, but the window for comments is very tight! The petition seeks certification of the Czech Aircraft Works Mermaid with an exemption to permit amphibious landing gear. Czech Aircraft Works has been denied S-LSA certification on grounds that the airplane's amphibious landing gear can be repositioned in flight. The Seaplane Pilots Association first warned potential buyers and manufacturers that FAA verbal claims about the acceptability of amphibious landing gear were not backed by the written Light Sport rules in 2004. The FAA has since acknowledged that the Light Sport rules as written do not permit amphibious operations, and has repeatedly indicated that the rule's language was a mistake that would be corrected. To date, no correction has been made. Czech Aircraft Work's petition gives the public an opportunity to provide official comments to the FAA in support of permitting amphibious landing gear on Light Sport Aircraft. If approved, the petition will also clear the way for further exemptions and/or accelerate revision of the Light Sport rules. For more information about this issue, including how to comment, visit SPA's Issue Brief at http://www.seaplanes.org/advocacy/lsamphib.htm. Michael Volk President -------- Any pilot can describe the mechanics of flying. What it can do for the spirit of man is beyond description. Barry M. Goldwater, US senator. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=5002#5002


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:27:27 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    From: "jimhefner" <hefner_jim@msn.com>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "jimhefner" <hefner_jim@msn.com> This topic is always interesting... there are those that have installed VG's and would never go back and there are those that have never tried them and have lots of doubt and skepticism.... rightfully so! When I first read about them on Jack Hart's website several months after I started flying my Firefly in Jan02, I was a very sceptical that something so seemingly insignificant could make that much difference in how the Firefly performs, but Jack's explanation and info was compelling, so I decided to go to HD and make up a set from Aluminum flashing. I installed them with long strips of electrical tape through the center between the fins, in the bottom of each valley, 11-12" back from leading edge, as Jack recommended, based on his testing. I taped them on, so I could easily remove them after proving to myself they didn't make that much difference.... well I did remove them after a couple flights.... to install them permanently!! I put silicone under each one and then reinstalled electrical tape as a backup safety factor and I check them reguarly, but have never had one come loose one bit. All you guys that are doubters and skeptics, the only thing I have to say to you is try them on your plane before you give lots of advice or plant doubt in others minds. I assure you there is nothing you will ever do to your Kolb that will get close to as much bang for the buck as even home made vortex generators will do for your Kolb. I have never noticed a single negative characteristic, regarding the way my plane flies, performance or handling. In fact, just the opposite. The Firefly had quite a bit of overbanking tendency before.... not now! Stalls are gentler and slow speed flight is incredibly stable... feels like I can hang from the prop and never drop a wing. Aileron effectivess and authority is much better, stall speed is lower, etc, etc... Make sure you also install them on the lower side of the Horizontal Stab's in the rear or your tail will stall before your wings. If you don't believe they work, then keep flying without them, but please don't discourage those newbies that are curious. Some folks are perfectly happy with their planes characteristics and then there are some of us that always are interested in improving what is already good. These planes fly great without Vortex Generators, but they fly even better with them. For me, I want to have them on when I'm in an engine out situation and need to put it down in a small space and want to land as slow as possible. I'm for sure in the category of folks that would never go back to flying my Firefly without them! Every claim Jack made was right on!! Thanks Jack for making me aware of them early on in my flying experience!! Your website was a wealth of info to me early on and I'm sure others have learned from your website as well. Keep up the good work!! Cheers, Jim -------- Jim Hefner Tucson, AZ Firefly #022 447, 2 blade IVO, BRS-750 Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=5033#5033


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:34:54 AM PST US
    From: Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil>
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil> << I really like what im hearing from you guys about vortex generators, im going to get the ones from www.landshorter.com They are well tested, of optimum height, shape, and are known to work well. They are only 100 bucks [Mr. Green] You just cant beat that deal. Michael Bigelow >> Michael - I bought a set of the Landshorter VGs, but have not yet installed them on my Kolb. For a hundred bucks, it's worth it (to me) for the time I'd save compared to manufacturing a set from scratch. They are single-fin VGs, made of clear Lexan The instructions recommend a spacing interval of 2.5 to 3 inches. However, I am contemplating the idea of placing one VG in each valley, for a total of 28 per wing for a Mark-III. I wonder if this spacing would still allow the VGs to be effective? Has anybody else on the Kolb List installed the Landshorter VGs? If so, how did you space them? Dennis Kirby Mark-III, 912ul New Mexico <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"State"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"place"/> <!--[if !mso]> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> I really like what im hearing from you guys about vortex generators, im going to get the ones from www.landshorter.com They are well tested, of optimum height, shape, and are known to work well. They are only 100 bucks [Mr. Green] You just cant beat that deal. Michael Bigelow <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Michael <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>I bought a set of the Landshorter VGs, but have not yet installed them on my Kolb. For a hundred bucks, its worth it (to me) for the time Id save compared to manufacturing a set from scratch. They are single-fin VGs, made of clear Lexan <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>The instructions recommend a spacing interval of 2.5 to 3 inches. However, I am contemplating the idea of placing one VG in each valley, for a total of 28 per wing for a Mark-III. I wonder if this spacing would still allow the VGs to be effective? <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Has anybody else on the Kolb List installed the Landshorter VGs? <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>If so, how did you space them? <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Dennis Kirby <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Mark-III, 912ul <st1:State w:st=3D"on"><st1:place w:st=3D"on"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Courier New"'>New Mexico</st1:place></st1:State><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial'>


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:47:10 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    From: "David.Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "David.Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net> Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland. wrote: > I bought a set of the Landshorter VGs, but have not yet installed them on my Kolb. For a hundred bucks, it's worth it (to me) for the time I'd save compared to manufacturing a set from scratch. They are single-fin VGs, made of clear Lexan > Has anybody else on the Kolb List installed the Landshorter VGs? I installed Lexan type VGs on my experimental Super Cub and wished I had gone with metal (like on my Firestar)... In the process of cleaning the wings, three times I broke the Lexan VGs and had to replace them... They're not as flexible as they look... DVD -------- Any pilot can describe the mechanics of flying. What it can do for the spirit of man is beyond description. Barry M. Goldwater, US senator. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=5042#5042


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:55:29 AM PST US
    From: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us>
    Subject: VW powered Kolbs...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us> Well there is at least one other VW powered Kolb on the planet...it isn't very healthy right now, but here none the less. http://tinyurl.com/de277 Jeremy Casey Kilocharlie Drafting, Inc. www.kilocharlie.us


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:21:59 PM PST US
    From: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us>
    Subject: Firefly pictures...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us> I am rebuilding an older Firestar KXP and am adding the flaperon system from the Firefly/Slingshot. Would appreciate any pictures of the Firefly/Slingshot aileron torque tube in the area of the U-joint. Jeremy Casey Kilocharlie Drafting, Inc. www.kilocharlie.us


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:13:46 PM PST US
    From: "David Kulp" <undoctor@rcn.com>
    Subject: Wind vs. Ultrastar
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "David Kulp" <undoctor@rcn.com> Kolb builders, We've had severe wind the past few days. Newspaper reported one man lost about 18 evergreen trees. I lost one Ultrastar. I had the wings folded and covered for winter and a blast of wind tore the left side tiedown and the plane (vehicle) tipped onto its right side, the front five feet of the right wing leading edge taking the impact on a rise in the ground. The leading edge is visibly bowed when sighted from the rear - probably almost an inch in about ten feet - and the skin shows "waves". The trailing edge of the aileron has a bend straight in between two of the ribs to where the skin is loose. And the tubing that shapes the skin where the wing stops at the boom tube is bent in a couple of inches right about at the chord of the wing. I bought the aircraft already built, so I haven't had the construction experience many of you have. I'd appreciate a little insight as to what will be involved in repairing the damage; what I must do and what I can't do. Be gentle - I just spent a huge amount of time this past fall rebuilding parts of it and repainting it and I was soooooo looking forward to spring and being in the air again. Thanks for your help, Dave Kulp


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:48:24 PM PST US
    From: "Jim Ballenger" <ulpilot@cavtel.net>
    Subject: Re: Overreving 582
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jim Ballenger" <ulpilot@cavtel.net> All I had a similar problem with my 582 in cruise rpm as it would search for a steady rpm. It turned out to be a to lean issue. I put a larger jet in and it cured the problem. Jim Ballenger MK III X 582 Virginia Beach, VA Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:14 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Overreving 582 > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> > > Jack has a point here, if the fuel pump is not keeping up with demand at > full throttle, the float bowel level could be dropping enough to lean the > mixture causing the engine to rev slightly. Between the lean burn being > hotter and lack of lubricating fuel oil mix this could lead to a seizure > on > climb out. Not good. > Regardless I'll bet its one of the problems mentioned by Earl, Jack or > myself, please let us know what you find. > > Denny > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net> > To: <kolb-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:39 AM > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Overreving 582 > > >> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net> >> >> At 01:45 PM 1/17/06 -0500, you wrote: >>>--> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> >>> >>>Sounds like an air leak to me. >>> >>>Denny >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: <EnaudZ@aol.com> >> >> If not an air leak, check for momentary fuel system constriction >> problems. >> Look for water in the bottom of the float bowl, blow out or replace the >> fuel >> filter, check fuel pressure, your pump may be marginal for the higher >> flow >> rates. >> >> Jack B. Hart FF004 >> Winchester, IN >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:02:30 PM PST US
    From: "mike moulai" <kiwimick@sfmicro.fsnet.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "mike moulai" <kiwimick@sfmicro.fsnet.co.uk> All, The Landshorter VG's we have extensively tested and gained approval for on our Xtra in the UK are spaced at 3" and at 10% of wing chord, this is 225 millimeters back measured from the front apex of the L/E up over the camber. Hope this helps. Mike Xtra/Jab2200 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:34 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS > --> Kolb-List message posted by: Kirby Dennis Contr MDA/AL > <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil> > > << I really like what im hearing from you guys about vortex generators, im > going to get the ones from www.landshorter.com They are well tested, of > optimum height, shape, and are known to work well. They are only 100 > bucks > [Mr. Green] You just cant beat that deal. Michael Bigelow >> > > > Michael - > > > I bought a set of the Landshorter VGs, but have not yet installed them on > my > Kolb. For a hundred bucks, it's worth it (to me) for the time I'd save > compared to manufacturing a set from scratch. They are single-fin VGs, > made > of clear Lexan > > > The instructions recommend a spacing interval of 2.5 to 3 inches. > However, > I am contemplating the idea of placing one VG in each valley, for a total > of > 28 per wing for a Mark-III. I wonder if this spacing would still allow > the > VGs to be effective? > > > Has anybody else on the Kolb List installed the Landshorter VGs? > > If so, how did you space them? > > > Dennis Kirby > > Mark-III, 912ul > > New Mexico > > > <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" > xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> > > > <o:SmartTagType > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"State"/> > <o:SmartTagType > namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" > name=3D"place"/> > <!--[if !mso]> > <style> > st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } > </style> > <![endif]--> > <style> > <!-- > /* Style Definitions */ > p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal > {margin:0in; > margin-bottom:.0001pt; > font-size:12.0pt; > font-family:"Times New Roman";} > a:link, span.MsoHyperlink > {color:blue; > text-decoration:underline;} > a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed > {color:purple; > text-decoration:underline;} > span.EmailStyle17 > {mso-style-type:personal-compose; > font-family:Arial; > color:windowtext;} > @page Section1 > {size:8.5in 11.0in; > margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;} > div.Section1 > {page:Section1;} > --> > </style> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> I really like what > im hearing from you guys about vortex generators, im going to get the ones > from > www.landshorter.com They > are well tested, of optimum height, shape, and are known to work well. > They are only 100 bucks [Mr. Green] You just cant beat that > deal. Michael Bigelow > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Michael > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>I bought a set of the > Landshorter VGs, but have not yet installed them on my Kolb. For a > hundred bucks, its worth it (to me) for the time Id save compared > to manufacturing a set from scratch. They are single-fin VGs, made of > clear Lexan > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>The instructions > recommend a > spacing interval of 2.5 to 3 inches. However, I am contemplating the idea > of placing one VG in each valley, for a total of 28 per wing for a > Mark-III. > I wonder if this spacing would still allow the VGs to be effective? > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Has anybody else on > the Kolb > List installed the Landshorter VGs? > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>If so, how did you > space > them? > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Dennis Kirby > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Mark-III, 912ul > > > <st1:State w:st=3D"on"><st1:place > w:st=3D"on"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:"Courier New"'>New Mexico</st1:place></st1:State><font > size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'> > > > <span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'> > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:35:05 PM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: Wind vs. Ultrastar
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net> tough break Dave, looks like you get to learn covering and finishing now. The flimsy little parts inside are an easy fix. The time involved to do it over is the big deal for someone who was anticipating a flying spring. Put that wing in the garage and secure the rest of the plane out of the wind. Do an hour every day and you will be back in shape before you know it. -BB do not archive On 18, Jan 2006, at 4:12 PM, David Kulp wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "David Kulp" <undoctor@rcn.com> > Thanks for your help, > Dave Kulp > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:36:51 PM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <neilsenrmf@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: VW powered Kolbs...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <neilsenrmf@comcast.net> Jeremy Thanks for the photo. I would certainly like to know more. With all that insulation over the front of the intake system it looks like a turbo system but the exhaust doesn't look to be connected so????? Also can't see the engine mount or the redrive system if any. Looks like the classic flair too high landing. Its painful to see. Do not archive Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:54 PM Subject: Kolb-List: VW powered Kolbs... > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jeremy Casey" <n79rt@kilocharlie.us> > > Well there is at least one other VW powered Kolb on the planet...it > isn't very healthy right now, but here none the less. > > http://tinyurl.com/de277 > > > Jeremy Casey > Kilocharlie Drafting, Inc. > www.kilocharlie.us > > >


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:45:41 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: VW powered Kolbs...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> | | Thanks for the photo. I would certainly like to know more. Richard N: That is an old photo. Was around some years back. The aircraft is in Norway, Sweden, or some where over there. I do not know any more of the history of this MKIII. john h MKIII


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:13 PM PST US
    From: Diego Ospina <dospi@epm.net.co>
    Subject: Mark III on floats
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Diego Ospina <dospi@epm.net.co> Hello group, Is anyone in the list flying a Mark III classic on the Lotus Mono 2000? Thanks, Diego Ospina


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:34:23 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com>
    Subject: Re: Mark III on floats
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Larry Bourne" <biglar@gogittum.com> There's a FireStar on floats flying in Florida, and Frank Reynen's Mk III that's been sold, but they're the only ones to my knowledge. Some years ago a fella had a Mk III on a Full Lotus monofloat that he used to go bear watching in British Columbia, Canada, and then over to (I think) the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia. There were articles on it, and quite a write up on the 'net. Maybe someone here still has the URL's for that..........?? Lar. Do not Archive. Larry Bourne Palm Springs, CA Building Kolb Mk III N78LB Vamoose www.gogittum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diego Ospina" <dospi@epm.net.co> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:20 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Mark III on floats > --> Kolb-List message posted by: Diego Ospina <dospi@epm.net.co> > > Hello group, > > > Is anyone in the list flying a Mark III classic on the Lotus Mono 2000? > > > Thanks, > > Diego Ospina > > >


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:27:42 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    From: "Don G" <donghe@one-eleven.net>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Don G" <donghe@one-eleven.net> Men.. here was my expierience with VG's Started out by seeing all the posts here a few years ago and wondering about them...did a patent search on VG designs. Discovered a wealth of info at the US patent site. Much info from Military experiments back in the late 40,s up to current mach capable birds. INstalled home-made Vgs in the common fashion discussed here and Kolb list members websites. Used double sided carpet tape and moved them about 3 times fore and aft..mostly just to see what would happen. never took em off after that..only moved them around. Came to the conclusion that the farther forward you put them...the better your low speed stall and handleing is, the farthwer back...the higher your rate of climb was..but the stall speed goes back up some. FireFly could be made to climb at the angle of a Firestar with VG's. After a year and a half...and after looseing a few...knocking some off when washing..(they are a pain in this regard)...bought LandShorters for a hundred bucks. My opinion is they work better than the ones I made..look better, and are easier to wash around. They are on the FireFly permanent as far as I am concerned. IN a nutshell...they give the FFly a wing of a FStar...without the extra drag. If you try em...its a no-brainer. You will keep em! BEst 100 bucks I ever spent on this plane. -------- Don G FireFly#098 http://www.geocities.com/dagger369th/my_firefly.htm Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=5186#5186


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com> Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland. wrote: > > The instructions recommend a spacing interval of 2.5 to 3 inches. However, > I am contemplating the idea of placing one VG in each valley, for a total of > 28 per wing for a Mark-III. I wonder if this spacing would still allow the > VGs to be effective? > > > Dennis Kirby > Putting them in the valleys is probably good, but not at the expense of missing half of the generators. The instructions say you need X number of generators for a certain leingth of wing... If you put them in the valleys, and only have half as many generators as called for, you probably will get aobut half the benefit from them. Those vorticies need to be over most of the wing, one in each valley will help, but you are proabably passing up 50% of the benefit doing it like that. I will put them on as per the instructinos, or maybe inbetween and on top of each rib if that works out to being very close to what is called for. This is just my opinion, I have not tested yet, but I beleive Spacing the vortex generators to far apart will just limit the amount of wing that they affect, and limit your benefit from having them... I would write to the email address on www.landshorter.com They have done all types of testing and im sure they would answer your question far better than I ever could. Michael A. Bigelow -------- NO FEAR - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=5187#5187


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:00:35 PM PST US
    From: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: VORTEX GENERATORS
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> I guess it would be almost too obvious to suggest that since there are a whole herd of Kolb pilots who have done all sorts of VG testing on Kolbs, and know what works, then maybe it might be useful to listen to what they are saying and try what they are doing? Nah, never mind. That's a waste of time. Ask somebody else. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) do not archive JetPilot wrote: ><snip> >This is just my opinion, I have not tested yet, but I beleive Spacing the vortex generators to far apart will just limit the amount of wing that they affect, and limit your benefit from having them... > >I would write to the email address on www.landshorter.com They have done all types of testing and im sure they would answer your question far better than I ever could. > >Michael A. Bigelow > > <snip>




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --