Kolb-List Digest Archive

Sun 07/09/06


Total Messages Posted: 26



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:06 AM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
     2. 04:40 AM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (pat ladd)
     3. 04:40 AM - Re: one eyed pilots (pat ladd)
     4. 09:12 AM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Craig Nelson)
     5. 10:15 AM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Mike Schnabel)
     6. 10:49 AM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
     7. 11:23 AM - Engine break-in, first taxiing (Mike Schnabel)
     8. 12:50 PM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Ralph Hoover)
     9. 01:01 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (Ralph Hoover)
    10. 01:13 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (Richard Pike)
    11. 01:20 PM - Re: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Richard Pike)
    12. 01:24 PM - Self creteque or humble pie served in great portions (Ralph Hoover)
    13. 01:29 PM - Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Ralph Hoover)
    14. 01:44 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (robert bean)
    15. 02:30 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (Mike Schnabel)
    16. 02:39 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (Mike Schnabel)
    17. 03:41 PM - Cross country fly-in (planecrazzzy)
    18. 05:00 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (robert bean)
    19. 05:22 PM - Re: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio! (Dave & Eve Pelletier)
    20. 05:56 PM - Thank Goodness For Big Tires... (David Lehman)
    21. 06:17 PM - Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires... (HShack@aol.com)
    22. 06:24 PM - Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires... (David Lehman)
    23. 08:20 PM - Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires... (jerb)
    24. 08:22 PM - Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires... (jerb)
    25. 09:24 PM - Mazolla-Me and slide me in! (boyd)
    26. 10:23 PM - Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing (Denny Rowe)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:06:57 AM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    Congratulations Ralph I know the feeling like it just happened yesterday one could not forget that day no matter how many times you get to try a new one out wishing you many enjoyable hours of pure flying in your Kolb Ellery in Maine do not archive


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:40:49 AM PST US
    From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> Great stuff Ralph. Congratulations. Pat do not archive --


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:40:50 AM PST US
    From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: one eyed pilots
    .and I'll bet the butler's housekeeper didn't have much money either!>> Hi Dave, its great playing to a really switched on audience> Cheers Pat do not archive


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:12:50 AM PST US
    From: "Craig Nelson" <Craig.Nelson@heraeus.com>
    Subject: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Craig Nelson" <Craig.Nelson@heraeus.com> Ralph THANKS FOR SHARING My heart was pounding as I went through your post! Brought back memories of my first flight in a Hummer. Congratulations!!!!!!!! Uncle Craig DO not Archive On 8, Jul 2006, at 8:04 PM, Ralph Hoover wrote: > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" > <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> > > First Flight! July 8th, 2006 Since first lesson August 6th, 2005! > Little money, lots of time. 19 hours of actual instruction. > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:07 AM PST US
    From: Mike Schnabel <tnfirestar2@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    Way to go Ralph! Great description of that first liftoff! Mike S Manchester TN Firestar 2 do not archive Ralph Hoover <flht99reh@columbus.rr.com> wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" First Flight! July 8th, 2006 Since first lesson August 6th, 2005! Little money, lots of time. 19 hours of actual instruction. Today I experienced the most frightening / exciting / emotional forty -five minutes of my life to date! knowing that going in, how could one describe the feelings of fear, exeleration and excitement balled up, if you will in a period of time that seemed like forever and yet less than a moment to reflect back upon? My intent, deep inside was to avoid the actual take-off of my Firestar, but yet come to the edge of where lift-off might exist. Knowing that my tail dragger and the Challenger had two-different modes of operendi, I knew that I didnt want to mistake what felt like lift or climb to actually become lift or climb. My PIC, whom by the way was not there at the time, stated: If, when your practicing your taxiing, the Kolb lifts off, make a decision, how much field is left and decide if you need to fly or make a close relationship with the soy field ahead. I chose to lift! Immediately after my decision, I thought: stupid, you didnt have to make this move , at this time , in this plane, here today. My heart began pounding, the plane wanted to lift like I have never felt, but was sought to Power forward and lift. At this point, I am at the end of the runway and climbing unlike I had at any time in the Challenger, with PIC aboard. Altimeter reading 1600 feet ASL. How is that, out of the chute, way before I was prior in the Challenger at twice the distance? Obviously, faulty instruments, correct when I am back on the ground. All my training comes into play: Gain altitude, keep airspeed above stall (stall, both mechanical and electrical ASI indicate way below stall, what gives?) Look down at the Garmin, which I installed at this time , not for flight but for shake down, was stating 34 MPH (ground speed). Crap, I need to crank forward and gain some speed and altitude. What am I thinking? I have been flying this pattern so many tim! es, its imbedded in my memory so deep that......Where is the field? Darned it, its only a six mile circular pattern, where is....OH! Whew! There is the field. Thank God. Wow, cant do anything about it now, its way to close, and Im way to high. Oh well, next round. Right wing rears up, CRAP! Right Aileron and a little left rudder, string went to the right, left rudder (stand away from the string). Now level, whops first turn, now down wind, yet really no wind, why is plane acting funny? What do I know about plane acting funny, this is the first time I have flown it? Getting mad and scared, common sense levels in. I have to make some choices; I am where I should be, at the altitude I should be by: WHAT.? AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 FEET, how did that happen, throttle back, leveling off, now at 2200 feet ASL. Need to get down to 1600 feet without loosing much air speed. God, Are you there? Work with me here God, This isnt what I would have chosen as my mode of operendi, but here it is on my plate.....HELP! First attempt to land: way too high, way too fast. Go around! Second attempt to land: still a little high, still too much speed. Third attempt: right height, speed a little fast, but I can dump that in time.....OH CRAP , What was that, left wing up, right aileron down, plane acted a tad bit funny. Where ok now, pul stick back, crank engine up, way to many things happening! Towers below, wind causing me to crab really bad, altitude way too high, so many things mounting up way to quickly! STOP! Think! What is the way you were taught? Calmly, gently on the stick. Forget that you have no idea how fast you are going. Ignore that flashing light on the panel stating EGT way too high! Think, one EGT reading that far off, obviously a wire crossed. ASI lamp blinking, expect that, the stupid ASI isnt reading correctly. You know the feeling. If the bottom begins falling out, push forward on the stick, DO NOT PULL BACK! Back in control, as much control as I could possibly have a! t this point. God! you are still with me, arent you? Of course, if I drop, well, In heaven with Him, I will be. But that would not be His choice, for me at this time in this place, Thank you Jesus! What is thta little dot on the field? Lets see, 400 feet on final AGL, Airspeed, no idea, but feels (what the H do I know about feel in a Kolb), since I have never felt a Kolb before? Oh well, I believe that this feels and looks like where I had been before in the Challenger at this altitude, at this feeling (read speed) and Dave is standing at the 1/4 field length guiding me in. STUPID! GET OFF THE FIELD! That didnt do anything. Dave is moving his right hand flat in an up and down motion. Ah-ha! Cut throttle, forward stick, line up with the field, WHOO! a gust, right aileron down, right rudder slow, slow pull back, pull back some more, there thump, wheels on the ground. Stick all the way back, whoa, now I have ground control, speed bleeding off, stopped at half field. Job done! Now after hugs and pats on the back. I take the Kolb to the hanger. Shaking along the way. thank you Lord! Thank you Dave. Thank you instructor Andy. I asked these guys: did you ever forget the feeling of your first flight? Apparently NOT! Now I understand the N.V.M.of S. phrase that God gave me! Rip goes the shirt! Going back again tomorrow. Lot more to learn but who, but those that have been what we have been through, could possibly understand? Calmed like the sea....Ralph of Ohio! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45773#45773 ---------------------------------


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:49:12 AM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM@comcast.net> Congratulations Ralph!!!! Thanks for sharing. Sounds like you may have a static source issue with your air speed indicator. Check the archives for options. I disconnected the tube from my static source pick up and just used the cockpit pressure as a static source. It works much better than the static source I was using. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 8:04 PM > --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" > <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> > > First Flight! July 8th, 2006 Since first lesson August 6th, 2005! Little > money, lots of time. 19 hours of actual instruction. > > > Today I experienced the most frightening / exciting / emotional > forty -five minutes of my life to date! knowing that going in, how could > one describe the feelings of fear, exeleration and excitement balled up, > if you will in a period of time that seemed like forever and yet less than > a moment to reflect back upon? > > My intent, deep inside was to avoid the actual ?otake-off? of my > Firestar, but yet come to the edge of where lift-off might exist. Knowing > that my tail dragger and the Challenger had two-different modes of > operendi, I knew that I didn?Tt want to mistake what felt like lift or > climb to actually become lift or climb. My PIC, whom by the way was not > there at the time, stated: ?oIf, when your practicing your taxiing, the > Kolb lifts off, make a decision, how much field is left and decide if you > need to fly or make a close relationship with the soy field ahead. I chose > to lift! > > Immediately after my decision, I thought: ?ostupid, you didn?Tt have to > make this move , at this time , in this plane, here today?. My heart > began pounding, the plane wanted to lift like I have never felt, but was > sought to ?oPower forward and lift?. At this point, I am at the end of > the runway and climbing unlike I had at any time in the Challenger, with > PIC aboard. Altimeter reading 1600 feet ASL. How is that, out of the > chute, way before I


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:23:12 AM PST US
    From: Mike Schnabel <tnfirestar2@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    This report will pale in comparison the Ralph from Ohio's recent First Flight report... I cant wait for that day to happen here! But here is an update on my Firestar 2, it has waited patiently in the trailer the past 10 months for me to show her some daylight. So finally home from work long enough, and the weather was perfect enough, I did a little engine break-in work last Friday After determining the battery that was new but now dead (2 years of storage will do that to a battery I guess), and could not be recharged, a new batt was installed. Tied the tail wheel down to a nearby stump with cargo straps used on a C-130 (a souvenir from my ANG stint, and I figured if this bird breaks these babies it deserves to fly on its own!). The first start up was a little slow. Cranked over several times before the fuel lines fully filled and it started (yes I did prime the lines, but still took a while). It smoked like a freight train the first few minutes, enough so that I became concerned and shut it down to verify there was nothing amiss, stuck oil line or poorly adjusted injector. I could find nothing wrong, so restarted. This time she fired on the second revolution (Sweet!), and within another minute or so the exhaust cleared, and things looked normal. Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few spots it liked and would hold dead steady (5000 was one). But a few were hard to hold steady (5500), where it would hold then slowly climb, tap the throttle a tad to get it back, steady, then it would slowly drop... so for some of the 5 minutes runs would have to baby it to keep it on target, others would hold perfect the whole 5 minutes. Prop flex perhaps? Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. At WOT 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. From what I have learned these are acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of 6000, should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later did I understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. This was my mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue though was best to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. The 65-minute process consumed just under 3 gallons of fuel. That was my estimate, and what I loaded. I doubt it would have run 5 more minutes with what was left in the tanks. After the break-in and a 30 minute cool down. I installed the short windscreen after removing the full enclosure. Wade L commented to me a few days before (during a visit to see the plane) that once I flew a summer flight with the shortie I would probably not want the full back on till the winter. Once I sat in the seat and could see the view improvement, I believe what he said will be totally correct! So sitting there, break in complete, and there was sure a lot of sunlight left... a bit more fuel and on to some taxi runs on the new airstrip. Now its been about 15 years since my last tail dragger experience (Sorrell Hyperlight ultralight), so nice and easy, and SLOW were key words I kept in mind. The first few passes were actually pleasantly controllable, the only issue was my turnarounds, and I suppose that at such slow speeds with the narrow tail wheel the radius consumed all 100' width of my strip. First runs were below 20 MPH, but in about 30 minutes I realized I was breaching 30 to 35 and had to watch for those first signs of lift (did not want an inadvertent lift off at this time!). I also noticed that with more speed turn radius did improve a good bit. Still not sure about the heel brakes though. Held me when stopped or very near a stop, but dont think I will count on them for any urgent slowing down at higher speeds. Continued on for about 15 more minutes, and felt satisfied that some good progress was made today. Back into the trailer she went... but just before that, I took a few pictures. The setting sun was glistened on the wings so brightly I could imagine the original owner of this bird offering an approving smile from the heavens above. Next, I am waiting for some replies from some LSA instructors I have contacted so I can get some dual hours, and begin work toward the Sport Pilot ticket, so I can legally get the FS2 up in the air where I know she really longs to be!! Mike S Manchester TN Firestar 2 503 ---------------------------------


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:50:29 PM PST US
    From: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@columbus.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> Quote: Sounds like you may have a static source issue with your air speed indicator. Check the archives for options. I disconnected the tube from my static source pick up and just used the cockpit pressure as a static source. It works much better than the static source I was using. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIc Yes Rick ,and the funny thing is I asked Kolb a couple times why I might be getting mis-readings. They suggested that I feed the static tube out between the plastic nose at the rear and the rest of the material, at the side. To me, this seemed to act more like an "atomiser" pick-up nozzle and would creater a greater differencial than what pressurized the input (Pitot). I believe your right. I need to disconnect the static line inside the cabin and see what happens. I will say that both (since they were connected to the same inlet and outlets), read exactly the same, but most assuradly not the actual. Scarry at that time since everyone knows air speed and altitude are critical any time let alone "First Flight"! And something besides first flight; This was not just my first flight in a Kolb solo, It was literally my first flight solo, et: nobody else in the plane, like the PIC to say, "I'll take from here"! I don't know, but this was as close as the saying by another brother Kolber: "earn your wings on the way down"! Thank you all for your acknoledgment. Never knew it would be quite like that. I was supprised in all that read my story no one asked what God gving me the N.V.M. of S. stood for! And I want to thank this site and every member of the Kolb Family for their input, wisdom, kindness and out-there-way, even though they probably mentioned the same advise a hundred times before and didn't stick it in my face. You all know who you are. I am truely Blessed to have Family like you. Tear'ry-eyed in Ohio Ralph! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45898#45898


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:01:42 PM PST US
    From: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@columbus.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> Mike "get the FS2 up in the air where I know she really longs to be!! " And I have-ta-tell-ya...SHE DOES! Home-sick Angle! I also noted that with power and stick all the way back it will turn pretty tight with right or left rudder on the ground. that prop energy sure makes a difference. As for the brakes. You really don't want them like a cars, to stop on a dime or like my first taxi trip, she will bow-down to momma Earth, rasing her tail feathers and creating a "MOONING" to the world hard to live down. I also noted on my Taxi practice thta full power from a stand still makes one embarrising Mooning all over the field. I think I have experienced every "dumb" method of ground driving that could exist. One other, I might share, Remember: no power to the prop, no control of the direction! Gulp , I know that one real well. For more exciting reading on what I did wrong on my last taxi / flight read my post "self creteque or humble pie served in great portions"! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45902#45902


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:13:53 PM PST US
    From: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> Congrats! Let me interject a few comments within your post. - Mike Schnabel wrote: <snip> Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few spots it liked and would hold dead steady (5000 was one). But a few were hard to hold steady (5500), where it would hold then slowly climb, tap the throttle a tad to get it back, steady, then it would slowly drop... so for some of the 5 minutes runs would have to baby it to keep it on target, others would hold perfect the whole 5 minutes. Prop flex perhaps? <snip> My comments - Your engine will not get perfectly settled in for about 30 hours. Even then, a two stroke will sometimes changes rpm's slightly depending on prop load and whether it is "on the pipe," or "off the pipe." The resonant exhaust characteristics can cause minor horsepower (and RPM) excursions within certain ranges. It is slightly affected by prop load and jetting. Live with it, it will probably get better with time. <snip> Mike said - Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. At WOT 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. From what I have learned these are acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of 6000, should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later did I understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. This was my mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue though was best to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. <snip> My comments: - Your current RPM on the ground of 6000 is acceptable. You especially do not want 6500 rpm on the ground. For instance - Last Friday I finally got done making airworthy an airplane I sold 15 years ago to a friend, and which had not flown for several years, and then he died. I am getting it airworthy for his widow to sell. He had purchased a new Powerfin prop for it. I have never fooled with a Powerfin before. Installed it as the data sheet specified, and the rpm's at runup were too low (in my opinion - duh), about 5800 rpm. Took out enough pitch to get it up to 6100 rpm static, fortunately I also raised the needles and went one size bigger on the main jets to keep the temps conservative. Taxied out and took off, and the Powerfin let that puppy jump up to 6800 rpm on climbout, with EGT's at the max to match. Babied it carefully around the pattern and landed it w/o incident. Tomorrow I will crank enough pitch back into it to get it down to 5800 rpm static again, so that in flight, as it unloads, things balance out properly. But the point is, for you, right now your temps are ok, but your rpm is a bit low. However, your prop will allow your RPM to unload to probably somewhere around 6200 in flight, that is safe enough, and most likely, as your prop unloads, your EGT's will go up a hair, and your CHT will come down a hair, and you will be in very safe territory, even if not optimum for performance. At this stage, you don't care about optimum performance, you will have all the performance you need, plus some, you want maximum reliability. If you take out enough pitch to get your rpm anywhere close to 6500 static, the prop will unload in more flight, and your EGT will go through the roof. That is not maximum reliability. That is giving you things to worry about on your first trip around the pattern that you don't need. For more information on how to adjust prop pitch to affect your CHT and EGT readings, check out http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg11.htm Again, congratulations on your successful (semi) crow hops! Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Mike S > Manchester TN > Firestar 2 503 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview>. It's > not radically different. Just radically better.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:20:01 PM PST US
    From: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> I wondered about that. My guess was "N - Voluntary - Medal of Stupidity"? (because the Lord gives me a lot of those...) Probably not close, but how'd I do? Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) do not archive Ralph Hoover wrote: > <snip> > > I was supprised in all that read my story no one asked what God gving me the N.V.M. of S. stood for! > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:24:56 PM PST US
    From: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@columbus.rr.com>
    Subject: Self creteque or humble pie served in great portions
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> Now that I slept on it and reviewed every move I made and that they are all fresh in my mind, I'm gonna spill my guts, figuratively below. Below are the things I should have done but didn't, IN CASE the plane did take off. 1). Its best to have your instructor there with you at the time. Not in the plane but there watching. 2). It would be smart to have a radio and ground communication with your Instructor. 3). Instrument readings need to be where they belong: CHT and EGT should not be flashing, even though you know they are off a bit, but really, at the time adequate. 4). Know "winds aloft" cause most times they will NOT be as they were on the ground. 5). ALWAYS TRUST the instruments such as: Alt, string, ASI (unless they are really wacky). 6). Remember ALWAYS, you will resort under pressure, to the way you were drilled through out your training! 7) Relax, if you CAN! Below are the things I DID DO in case I was making a premature flight. 1). Full tank of fuel. 2). Complete walk around, outside and in. 3). All instruments set as they should be, altimeter, check mags, gauges. 4). Have a plan even though you don't expect to implement it. Up there with everything else going on is NOT the place to decide what next. 5). Know the field your taxying from, it will get lost in all the crazy once you accidentally get up. 6). Know fuel consumption rate. 7). Know your field and the little ideocrincrees about it. 8). Get a good look often at the wind sock as you pass over the field, it changes in Ohio a lot! 9). Trust in your training and your trainer, even when it doesn't feel right or natural. 10). If you dont know, be willing to ask and show your ignorance this time. It may save one from eating a lot of crow or a lot of soybean field dirt! 11). No matter what the razzing or how the comments come back from some on the Kolb web site, there will always be good sincere, level headed, I been there done that information to glean! All of the above caused in some way for me to come down safely both plane and driver, those and the Lord I serve. Any other good recomendations anyone else can insert would always be appreciated. I can, at 61 years still learn from others advise and mistakes. Better for it Ohio Ralph Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45905#45905


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:29:15 PM PST US
    From: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@columbus.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Ralph Hoover" <flht99reh@Columbus.rr.com> Mr. Pike, not even close. But I don't want to spill the beans just yet. You will be plesently supprised, being a Preacher and all! Humble Pie is good cold or warmed up here in Ohio! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45907#45907


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:44:49 PM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    Mike, nice report. I will print a copy for my neighbor who is about to do a first run up of his 503/Flightstar. Noticing your description of turning radius, since I have the "economy" setup of a single brake on my MkIII, I can't do a hard brake turn. If there are no trees to hit I can do full forward stick, left pedal, and a buzz on the throttle to get around in a fairly small radius (grass of course). If the ground is rough I get out and do a tail lift to save what is obviously an easy to damage tail structure. I don't have enough ambition to weld in a bunch of stabilizing members. The engine, in last evening's splendid calm air, sounded maybe a little uneven (always happens when nothing else is amiss) so today I unscrewed the old NGK single electrode plugs with 50 hours on them. The center plug shows a little leaner run than the ends but not bad. Replaced with 4 electrode Bosch. -BB MkIII, .993L Suzuki do not archive On 9, Jul 2006, at 2:21 PM, Mike Schnabel wrote: > This report will pale in comparison the Ralph from Ohio's recent First > Flight report... I can=92t wait for that day to happen here! > - > But here is an update on my Firestar 2, it has waited patiently in the > trailer the past 10 months for me to show her some daylight. So > finally home from work long-enough, and the weather was perfect > enough, I did a little engine break-in work last Friday > - > After determining the battery that was new but now dead (2 years of > storage will do that to a battery I guess), and could not be > recharged, a new batt was installed. Tied the tail wheel down to a > nearby stump with cargo straps used on a C-130 (a souvenir from my ANG > stint, and I figured if this bird breaks these babies it deserves to > fly on its own!). The first start up was-a little slow. Cranked over > several times before-the fuel-lines fully filled and it started (yes I > did prime the lines, but still took a while). It smoked like a freight > train the first few minutes, enough so that I became concerned and > shut it down to verify there was nothing amiss, stuck oil line or > poorly adjusted injector. I could find nothing wrong, so restarted. > This time she fired on the second revolution (Sweet!), and within > another minute or so the exhaust cleared, and things looked normal. > - > Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the > appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few > spots it liked and would hold dead steady (5000 was one). But a few > were hard to hold steady (5500), where it would hold then slowly > climb, tap the throttle a tad to get it back, steady, then it would > slowly drop... so for some of the 5 minutes runs would have to baby it > to keep it on target, others would hold perfect the whole 5 minutes. > Prop flex perhaps? > - > Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. At WOT > 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. =46rom what I have learned these are > acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of > 6000, should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later > did I understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. > This was my mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue > though was best to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. The > 65-minute process consumed just under 3 gallons of fuel. That was my > estimate, and what I loaded. I doubt it would have run-5 more minutes > with what was left in the tanks. > - > After the break-in and a 30 minute cool down. I installed the short > windscreen after removing the full enclosure. Wade L commented to me a > few days before (during a visit to see the plane) that once I flew a > summer flight with the shortie I would probably not want the full back > on till the winter. Once I sat in the seat and-could see the view > improvement, I believe what he said will be totally correct! > - > So sitting there, break in complete, and there was sure a lot of > sunlight left... a bit more fuel and on to some taxi runs on the new > airstrip. Now it=92s been about 15 years since my last tail dragger > experience (Sorrell Hyperlight ultralight), so nice and easy, and SLOW > were key words I kept in mind. The first few passes were actually > pleasantly controllable, the only issue was my turnarounds, and I > suppose that at such slow speeds with the narrow tail wheel the radius > consumed all 100' width of my strip. First runs were below 20 MPH, but > in about 30 minutes I realized I was breaching 30 to 35 and had to > watch for those first signs of lift (did not want an inadvertent lift > off at this time!). I also noticed that with more speed turn radius > did improve a good bit. Still not sure about the heel brakes though. > Held me when stopped or very near a stop, but-don=92t think I will count > on them for any urgent slowing down at higher speeds. > - > Continued on for about 15 more minutes, and felt satisfied that some > good progress was made today. Back into the trailer she went... but > just before that, I took a few pictures. The setting sun was glistened > on the wings so brightly=85 I could imagine the original owner of this > bird offering an approving smile from the heavens above. > - > Next, I am waiting for some replies from some LSA instructors I have > contacted so I can get some dual hours, and begin work toward the > Sport Pilot ticket, so I can legally get the FS2 up in the air where I > know she really longs to be!! > - > Mike S > Manchester TN > Firestar 2 503 > > Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. > Just radically better.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:30:26 PM PST US
    From: Mike Schnabel <tnfirestar2@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike Brother Pike---Congrats! Let me interject a few comments within your post. - Mike S----Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few spots it liked and would hold dead steady... Brother Pike----Your engine will not get perfectly settled in for about 30 hours. Even then, a two stroke will sometimes changes rpm's slightly depending on prop load and whether it is "on the pipe," or "off the pipe." Mike S---- Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. At WOT 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. From what I have learned these are acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of 6000, should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later did I understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. This was my mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue though was best to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. Brother Pike----Your current RPM on the ground of 6000 is acceptable. You especially do not want 6500 rpm on the ground. For instance - Last Friday I finally got done making airworthy an airplane I sold 15 years ago to a friend, and which had not flown for several years, and then he died. I am getting it airworthy for his widow to sell. He had purchased a new Powerfin prop for it. I have never fooled with a Powerfin before. Installed it as the data sheet specified, and the rpm's at run up were too low (in my opinion - duh), about 5800 rpm. Took out enough pitch to get it up to 6100 rpm static, fortunately I also raised the needles and went one size bigger on the main jets to keep the temps conservative. Taxied out and took off, and the Powerfin let that puppy jump up to 6800 rpm on climbout, with EGT's at the max to match. Babied it carefully around the pattern and landed it w/o incident. Tomorrow I will crank enough pitch back into it to get it down to 5800 rpm static again, so that in flight, as it unloads, things balance out properly. But the point is, for you, right now your temps are ok, but your rpm is a bit low. However, your prop will allow your RPM to unload to probably somewhere around 6200 in flight, that is safe enough, and most likely, as your prop unloads, your EGT's will go up a hair, and your CHT will come down a hair, and you will be in very safe territory, even if not optimum for performance. At this stage, you don't care about optimum performance, you will have all the performance you need, plus some, you want maximum reliability. If you take out enough pitch to get your rpm anywhere close to 6500 static, the prop will unload in more flight, and your EGT will go through the roof. That is not maximum reliability. That is giving you things to worry about on your first trip around the pattern that you don't need. Mike S---Excellent analysis of my current prop RPM situation. I know I need some tweaking, but was seeking, as you mentioned, a safe zone for initial flight. Once comfortable with the planes characteristics, the tweaking can begin. Trying to maximize a planes performance before the first flight always seemed hard to me... but it at least had to meet minimal requirements... I think I have that, and that is good. Brother Pike----Again, congratulations on your successful (semi) crow hops! Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Mike S----Thanks so very much, the real "crow hops" will be soon! Some may scoff my tendency toward safe aviation, but to them, I direct to the recent video posted here by David L. (Thanks Dave for the GREAT Video) with the fella flying a UL, At http://media.putfile.com/ultralight-flying Supposed I guess a fella with no training, no practice, sucked down a beer (or a cola, I dont know), flew the craft, somehow landed.... and his comment on landing was ... "I told you I could fly that shit. Now maybe this was a stunt video, who knows but it demonstrates a rare success of ignorance. In this case it was flying an ultralight. Tomorrow will it be a video of some other soul, but of him crashing a plane because he thought, it was just that easy to teach himself? Again, laugh at me if you will, but prefer to err on the side of safety. But dont let that gloss over the fact, I have one Bitchin Light plane here! And can hardly wait to fly her! Mike S Firestar2 503 Manchester TN Do not archive Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> wrote: --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike Congrats! Let me interject a few comments within your post. - Mike Schnabel wrote: Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few spots it liked and would hold dead steady (5000 was one). But a few were hard to hold steady (5500), where it would hold then slowly climb, tap the throttle a tad to get it back, steady, then it would slowly drop... so for some of the 5 minutes runs would have to baby it to keep it on target, others would hold perfect the whole 5 minutes. Prop flex perhaps? My comments - Your engine will not get perfectly settled in for about 30 hours. Even then, a two stroke will sometimes changes rpm's slightly depending on prop load and whether it is "on the pipe," or "off the pipe." The resonant exhaust characteristics can cause minor horsepower (and RPM) excursions within certain ranges. It is slightly affected by prop load and jetting. Live with it, it will probably get better with time. Mike said - Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. At WOT 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. From what I have learned these are acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of 6000, should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later did I understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. This was my mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue though was best to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. My comments: - Your current RPM on the ground of 6000 is acceptable. You especially do not want 6500 rpm on the ground. For instance - Last Friday I finally got done making airworthy an airplane I sold 15 years ago to a friend, and which had not flown for several years, and then he died. I am getting it airworthy for his widow to sell. He had purchased a new Powerfin prop for it. I have never fooled with a Powerfin before. Installed it as the data sheet specified, and the rpm's at runup were too low (in my opinion - duh), about 5800 rpm. Took out enough pitch to get it up to 6100 rpm static, fortunately I also raised the needles and went one size bigger on the main jets to keep the temps conservative. Taxied out and took off, and the Powerfin let that puppy jump up to 6800 rpm on climbout, with EGT's at the max to match. Babied it carefully around the pattern and landed it w/o incident. Tomorrow I will crank enough pitch back into it to get it down to 5800 rpm static again, so that in flight, as it unloads, things balance out properly. But the point is, for you, right now your temps are ok, but your rpm is a bit low. However, your prop will allow your RPM to unload to probably somewhere around 6200 in flight, that is safe enough, and most likely, as your prop unloads, your EGT's will go up a hair, and your CHT will come down a hair, and you will be in very safe territory, even if not optimum for performance. At this stage, you don't care about optimum performance, you will have all the performance you need, plus some, you want maximum reliability. If you take out enough pitch to get your rpm anywhere close to 6500 static, the prop will unload in more flight, and your EGT will go through the roof. That is not maximum reliability. That is giving you things to worry about on your first trip around the pattern that you don't need. For more information on how to adjust prop pitch to affect your CHT and EGT readings, check out http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg11.htm Again, congratulations on your successful (semi) crow hops! Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) > > Mike S > Manchester TN > Firestar 2 503 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com > . It's > not radically different. Just radically better. --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1/min.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:39:23 PM PST US
    From: Mike Schnabel <tnfirestar2@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    Robert (BB), Thanks for the reply! :-), and as for the radius turns comments, i had no idea (which is again an acknowledgement of my ignorance) which direction a prop blast would assist a turn. I thought, with the few trys i had, that making a right turn was the most efficent, but i would like to ask you, and the group, which way do you turn when radius is close, and with or with out brakes you choose to turn? Maybe i need a new name.... Rookie Mike Manchester, TN Firestar 2 503 do not archive robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net> wrote: Mike, nice report. I will print a copy for my neighbor who is about to do a first run up of his 503/Flightstar. Noticing your description of turning radius, since I have the "economy" setup of a single brake on my MkIII, I can't do a hard brake turn. If there are no trees to hit I can do full forward stick, left pedal, and a buzz on the throttle to get around in a fairly small radius (grass of course). If the ground is rough I get out and do a tail lift to save what is obviously an easy to damage tail structure. I don't have enough ambition to weld in a bunch of stabilizing members. The engine, in last evening's splendid calm air, sounded maybe a little uneven (always happens when nothing else is amiss) so today I unscrewed the old NGK single electrode plugs with 50 hours on them. The center plug shows a little leaner run than the ends but not bad. Replaced with 4 electrode Bosch. -BB MkIII, .993L Suzuki do not archive --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1/min.


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:37 PM PST US
    From: "planecrazzzy" <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Cross country fly-in
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "planecrazzzy" <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com> I went to a Fly-in today...it's not very far away...but since we had to fly AROUND Class "B" airspace....it made it aprox 80 miles there and 80 miles back.... This was a pretty good shake down flight for the Cross country that I have planned for the 21st of this month....I have two legs in that flight,Both around 85 miles each... I repitched my prop....I need to back it off a tad.....I was keeping up with an Aeronca that was flying with us....Problem was...we had a slow plane with us too , so we kept circling back....or I'd stay behind him and just keep flying side to side....it was easier to keep track of him that way. My dog went along too...She's doing fine... Pretty Gusty on the way back, it was NICE to get on the ground... Surface winds were 25 kts Gotta Fly... Mike & Jaz -------- . . . . . Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=45936#45936


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:00:32 PM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    Mike, my plane, for some unknown reason, tends to like left turns on the ground better. Maybe its the CCW engine rotation, the weight in the left seat, coriolis effect, tilted runway? Who knows, just seems that way. -BB do not archive On 9, Jul 2006, at 5:39 PM, Mike Schnabel wrote: > Robert (BB), > - > Thanks for the reply! :-), and as for the radius turns comments, i had > no idea (which is again an acknowledgement of my-ignorance) which > direction a prop blast would assist a turn. I thought, with the few > trys i had, that making a right turn was the most efficent, but i > would like to ask you, and the group, which way do you turn when > radius is close, and with or with out brakes you choose to turn? > - > Maybe i need a new name.... > - > Rookie Mike > Manchester, TN > Firestar 2 503 > - > do not archive > - > - > - > > > robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net> wrote: >> Mike, nice report. I will print a copy for my neighbor who is about to >> do >> a first run up of his 503/Flightstar. >> >> Noticing your description of turning radius, since I have the >> "economy" >> setup of a single brake on my MkIII, I can't do a hard brake turn. If >> there >> are no trees to hit I can do full forward stick, left pedal, and a >> buzz on the throttle to >> get around in a fairly small radius (grass of course). >> If the ground is rough I get out and do a tail lift to save what is >> obviously >> an easy to damage tail structure. I don't have enough ambition to weld >> in a bunch of stabilizing members. >> >> The engine, in last evening's splendid calm air, sounded maybe a >> little >> uneven (always happens when nothing else is amiss) so today I >> unscrewed >> the old NGK single electrode plugs with 50 hours on them. The center >> plug >> shows a little leaner run than the ends but not bad. Replaced with 4 >> electrode >> Bosch. >> -BB MkIII, .993L Suzuki >> do not archive > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great > rates starting at 1=A2/min.


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:02 PM PST US
    From: "Dave & Eve Pelletier" <pelletier@cableone.net>
    Subject: Re: First Flight Shaking Ralph of Ohio!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Dave & Eve Pelletier" <pelletier@cableone.net> > > Quote: > > Sounds like you may have a static source issue with your air speed > indicator. Check the archives for options. I disconnected the tube from my > static source pick up and just used the cockpit pressure as a static > source. > It works much better than the static source I was using. > Way back when I had my Firestar I took it completely apart to paint it. When I put it back together I mistakenly connected the static tube. Surprise, surprise, my lift off speed was 14 mph and cruise was around 35. Someone then told me that you're supposed to leave the static line disconnected. AzDave Do Not Archive > > >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:56:46 PM PST US
    From: "David Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net>
    Subject: Thank Goodness For Big Tires...
    Yesterday was the second day that I've flown my Firestar and at about 3.9hours since I put her back together and at 1500 feet, the engine quit without warning... The only field that looked halfway decent was plowed, but the wind was with the furrows... My 850x6 tires handled the rough ground without complaint... I got out of the plane, walked around looking for anything obvious, didn't find anything... Pulled the starter rope and she started first pull and ran perfect... I picked up the tail, turned her around and taxied to the end of the field, did a "runup", crossed my finger s and took off... Was only about a mile back to the airport and the engine never missed a beat... Got home, pulled the float bowl, perfectly clean, started and ran the engine several more times, no problem... "Gremlins", ugh... DVD -- "Attitude is everything ~ pick a good one"...


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:31 PM PST US
    From: HShack@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires...
    In a message dated 7/9/2006 8:58:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, david@davidlehman.net writes: Pulled the starter rope and she started first pull and ran perfect... I picked up the tail, turned her around and taxied to the end of the field, did a "runup", crossed my fingers and took off... Was only about a mile back to the airport and the engine never missed a beat... Got home, pulled the float bowl, perfectly clean, started and ran the engine several more times, no problem... "Gremlins", ugh... DVD Maybe a mini-siezure; pull the exhaust manifold & take a look at the cylinder walls. Howard Shackleford FS II SC


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:24:59 PM PST US
    From: "David Lehman" <david@davidlehman.net>
    Subject: Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires...
    RPM never varied (until it quit), prop kept windmilling, CHT was rock solid on 300 degrees, really good running 503, when it's running... I reached around and pulled the choke/enrichener/whatever and it didn't make any difference... DVD On 7/9/06, HShack@aol.com <HShack@aol.com> wrote: > > In a message dated 7/9/2006 8:58:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, > david@davidlehman.net writes: > > Pulled the starter rope and she started first pull and ran perfect... I > picked up the tail, turned her around and taxied to the end of the field, > did a "runup", crossed my fingers and took off... Was only about a mile > back to the airport and the engine never missed a beat... Got home, pull ed > the float bowl, perfectly clean, started and ran the engine several more > times, no problem... "Gremlins", ugh... > > DVD > > > Maybe a mini-siezure; pull the exhaust manifold & take a look at the > cylinder walls. > > Howard Shackleford > FS II > SC > -- "Attitude is everything ~ pick a good one"...


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:20:28 PM PST US
    From: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net> Do you have an in-line primer bulb - if so does it have a by-pass installed in case the check valve sticks closed. It's happened before, it surely can happen again. jerb


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:22:14 PM PST US
    From: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Thank Goodness For Big Tires...
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net> Thought of this just after sending my prior reply. Not sure what engine you have, any chance of a ignition switch failure, intermittent or a soft snap action. jerb


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:24:37 PM PST US
    From: "boyd" <by0ung@brigham.net>
    Subject: Mazolla-Me and slide me in!
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "boyd" <by0ung@brigham.net> I did a quick drawing in paint of how to eliminate 1 or 2 windshield post And emailed it to Ralph. If anyone else wants a copy let me know Boyd by0ung@brigham.net do not archive


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:23:27 PM PST US
    From: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net>
    Subject: Re: Engine break-in, first taxiing
    --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Denny Rowe" <rowedl@highstream.net> Mike, I totally agree with Brother Richards advice below. Sounds like you are in the ball park with the prop. Denny do not archive ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 4:12 PM > --> Kolb-List message posted by: Richard Pike <richard@bcchapel.org> > > Congrats! Let me interject a few comments within your post. - > > Mike Schnabel wrote: > <snip> Ran through the Rotax break-in process chart, changing RPM at the > appropriate intervals. Watching closely all gauges. RPM had a few spots it > liked and would hold dead steady (5000 was one). But a few were hard to > hold steady (5500), where it would hold then slowly climb, tap the > throttle a tad to get it back, steady, then it would slowly drop... so for > some of the 5 minutes runs would have to baby it to keep it on target, > others would hold perfect the whole 5 minutes. Prop flex perhaps? > <snip> > My comments - Your engine will not get perfectly settled in for about 30 > hours. Even then, a two stroke will sometimes changes rpm's slightly > depending on prop load and whether it is "on the pipe," or "off the pipe." > The resonant exhaust characteristics can cause minor horsepower (and RPM) > excursions within certain ranges. It is slightly affected by prop load and > jetting. Live with it, it will probably get better with time. > <snip> > Mike said - Temps looked within range, at 4000-RPM CHT/300 and EGT/925. > At WOT 6000-RPM CHT/400 and EGT/1000. From what I have learned these are > acceptable. The only deviation from expectation was the Max RPM of 6000, > should have been more like 6500 (on the ground). Not until later did I > understand about setting the prop load down prior to break-in. This was my > mistake, but I was assured it would not be a major issue though was best > to be set for a correct Max RPM on the ground. > <snip> > My comments: - Your current RPM on the ground of 6000 is acceptable. You > especially do not want 6500 rpm on the ground. For instance - Last Friday > I finally got done making airworthy an airplane I sold 15 years ago to a > friend, and which had not flown for several years, and then he died. I am > getting it airworthy for his widow to sell. He had purchased a new > Powerfin prop for it. I have never fooled with a Powerfin before. > Installed it as the data sheet specified, and the rpm's at runup were too > low (in my opinion - duh), about 5800 rpm. Took out enough pitch to get > it up to 6100 rpm static, fortunately I also raised the needles and went > one size bigger on the main jets to keep the temps conservative. Taxied > out and took off, and the Powerfin let that puppy jump up to 6800 rpm on > climbout, with EGT's at the max to match. Babied it carefully around the > pattern and landed it w/o incident. Tomorrow I will crank enough pitch > back into it to get it down to 5800 rpm static again, so that in flight, > as it unloads, things balance out properly. But the point is, for you, > right now your temps are ok, but your rpm is a bit low. However, your prop > will allow your RPM to unload to probably somewhere around 6200 in flight, > that is safe enough, and most likely, as your prop unloads, your EGT's > will go up a hair, and your CHT will come down a hair, and you will be in > very safe territory, even if not optimum for performance. At this stage, > you don't care about optimum performance, you will have all the > performance you need, plus some, you want maximum reliability. If you take > out enough pitch to get your rpm anywhere close to 6500 static, the prop > will unload in more flight, and your EGT will go through the roof. That is > not maximum reliability. That is giving you things to worry about on your > first trip around the pattern that you don't need. > For more information on how to adjust prop pitch to affect your CHT and > EGT readings, check out > http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg11.htm > Again, congratulations on your successful (semi) crow hops! > Richard Pike > MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) >> >> Mike S >> Manchester TN >> Firestar 2 503 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com >> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview>. It's >> not radically different. Just radically better. > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > http://wiki.matronics.com > > > -- > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --