Kolb-List Digest Archive

Wed 08/01/07


Total Messages Posted: 42



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:37 AM - Wing root gap seal on FS I (Thom Riddle)
     2. 05:43 AM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (Thom Riddle)
     3. 06:11 AM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (olendorf)
     4. 06:42 AM - Re: OSH 2007 (Russ Kinne)
     5. 08:04 AM - Re: OSH 2007 (Russ Kinne)
     6. 08:12 AM - Re: needles for 447 (JetPilot)
     7. 09:17 AM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
     8. 10:06 AM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (Thom Riddle)
     9. 10:51 AM - Re: Back from Oshkosh (pat ladd)
    10. 11:39 AM - Re: Re: OSH 2007 (pat ladd)
    11. 12:56 PM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (jb92563)
    12. 01:12 PM - Re: OSH 2007 (jb92563)
    13. 01:20 PM - Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident (Bob Noyer)
    14. 01:33 PM - Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident (Michael Sharp)
    15. 01:38 PM - Re: Re: OSH 2007, Meigs arpt, NOT (Bob Noyer)
    16. 01:49 PM - New to the list (tommy thompson)
    17. 01:58 PM - Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident (flymichigan@comcast.net)
    18. 02:20 PM - Re: Kolb tail movement ??? (jb92563)
    19. 02:53 PM - Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident (Eugene Zimmerman)
    20. 03:00 PM - Re: New to the list (planecrazzzy)
    21. 03:11 PM - Oshkosh 2007 - What a Trip! (John Williamson)
    22. 03:35 PM - Re: New to the list (Richard Pike)
    23. 03:41 PM - Wing strut vibration (Larry Cottrell)
    24. 03:51 PM - Non-Kolb related (Richard Pike)
    25. 04:04 PM - Re: Wing strut vibration  (Jack B. Hart)
    26. 04:05 PM - Re: Non-Kolb related (flymichigan@comcast.net)
    27. 04:23 PM - Re: Re: Wing strut vibration  (Larry Cottrell)
    28. 04:53 PM - Re: Non-Kolb related (Kolbdriver)
    29. 05:02 PM - Kolb Tailwheel Springs (JRatcli256@aol.com)
    30. 05:09 PM - Registration to Inspection Time Laps (JRatcli256@aol.com)
    31. 05:21 PM - Re: Kolb Tailwheel Springs (John Hauck)
    32. 06:25 PM - The Truth about the SP-LSA rule (Thom Riddle)
    33. 06:30 PM - Re: Re: Wing strut vibration (Jack B. Hart)
    34. 06:32 PM - Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (Thom Riddle)
    35. 06:39 PM - Re: Re: Wing strut vibration (Jack B. Hart)
    36. 07:04 PM - Re: Re: Wing strut vibration  (gary aman)
    37. 07:42 PM - Re: Wing strut vibration (John Williamson)
    38. 07:42 PM - Re: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
    39. 08:36 PM - Re: Kolb Tailwheel Springs (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
    40. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: Wing strut vibration (Larry Cottrell)
    41. 11:01 PM - Official Kolb-List FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (Matt Dralle)
    42. 11:04 PM - Official Kolb-List Usage Guidelines (Matt Dralle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:37:03 AM PST US
    Subject: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    Folding/unfolding the wings on the FS I for every flight is not a big deal since I've built a tail dolly that precludes the need to fold/unfold the tail. But, the wing root gap seal is a bit of a PITA, especially the aft part. My question is this: How important is the aft half of the upper airfoil gap seal? My thought is to cut the gap seal at about the half way point and eliminate the back/aft part but would like to hear your thoughts on the subject before doing so. Keep in mind that my FS I has the canister BRS sticking up high in front of the engine which probably disturbs the airflow big time in that area anyway. -------- Thom in Buffalo N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- &quot;Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.&quot; Albert Einstein Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126869#126869


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:15 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    Oops! I should have posted a photo of the area I'm talking about. In the attached photo, I'm thinking of cutting the gap seal cross wise about where the rear most part of the BRS mount is located, and not use the part aft of that area, leaving it open. -------- Thom in Buffalo N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- &quot;Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.&quot; Albert Einstein Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126872#126872 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/197bg_rt_rear_qrtr_engine_293.jpg


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:11:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "olendorf" <olendorf@gmail.com>
    My cover ends at the front of the engine. I have no problems. Maybe it would lower my stall speed a little if it came back farther but I'm happy with it. -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126882#126882


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:15 AM PST US
    From: Russ Kinne <russ@rkiphoto.com>
    Subject: Re: OSH 2007
    John No dragline pic! -- two sunsets & a dowtown pic -- On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:03 PM, John Hauck wrote: > > Got back from OSH yesterday. Spent 10 days and 9 nights sleeping > on the ground. Thank God I can still do it comfortably. > > Flew 23.2 hours. > > Burned 116.4 gal fuel. > > Traveled 1,907.04 sm. > > Had a ball!!! > > Got to spend the entire week with the Kolb gang in the Kolb > trailer. Was great to be able to enjoy their company for a week. > > Spent the night flying north at Washinton, IN. RON Washington, IN, > on the way home. > > Here are a few photos I took during the flight up and back. > > This is a huge drag line in Kentucky on a reclaimed coal strip > mine. Never really knew how large they were until I landed on the > gravel road next to it, and taxiied up under the operator's cab. > Estimate the main boom is over 300 feet long. > > The other photos are Lake Michigan. I flew down the lake after the > wind shifted out of the SE, the direction I wanted to fly to fly > across it and land in Michigan, 60 miles away. The flight from > Manitowoc, WI, to Ludington, MI, would be directly over the ferry > route. I also had on a PFD, just in case. Instead, I flew the > lake off shore down to Gary, IN, right past downtown Chicago, IL. > Was a very beautiful and exciting flight over 180 sm of water > instead of 60. ;-) I am mighty proud of my little mkIII and its > 912ULS. > > I'll probably have to spread these photos out over several posts. > There are 16 of the many I took on this flight. > > -------- > John Hauck > MKIII/912ULS > hauck's holler, alabama > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126795#126795 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/0001_02_204.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/0001_02_110.jpg > http://forums.matronics.com//files/0001_01_105.jpg > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:04:17 AM PST US
    From: Russ Kinne <russ@rkiphoto.com>
    Subject: Re: OSH 2007
    John Finally got the drag line pix -- awesome! You averaged 82MPH on your trip @ 5GPH -- that ULS is some engine Fair winds, Russ


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: needles for 447
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    I also fly with a Rotax 447, and it is rock solid stable at any RPM. I can set it at 4700 and it will run there all day long, never any of the surging or other problems mentioned by Thomas. EGT and CHT are fine no matter what RPM I run the engine at. It really sounds like a carb probem, or something more serious than just needle settings Thomas. Check all other possibilities, you will probably be kicking yourself for doing all this methodical testing of different needles and jets just to find out it did not matter because of an air leak or other problem. Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126921#126921


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:17:55 AM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    That's just what I did to my gap seal on my Original firestar it didn't change the flying characteristics at all Ellery in Maine N447EB do not archive ************************************** all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:06:49 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    Thanks, guys. That is what I figured. Mine will be shortened soon. -------- Thom in Buffalo N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- &quot;Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.&quot; Albert Einstein Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126956#126956


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:51:46 AM PST US
    From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Back from Oshkosh
    due to the two mustangs crashing. >> Hi Will, do you know which Mustangs? I flew Crazy Horse with Lee Lauderbeck a few years ago at Kissimmee. The highlight of my flying career. Pat


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:39:55 AM PST US
    From: "pat ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: OSH 2007
    Hi John, Lovely pics of the Chicago waterfront. I know it well from my Microsoft Simulator. I was never ever able to pull off the landing at Meiggs Field until I had actually stood on the Pier and watched the planes approaching.. When I tried the simulator the next time it worked, no problem. Microsoft pics. are not as good as yours. Pat


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:56:25 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "jb92563" <jb92563@yahoo.com>
    Is there also a bottom gap seal? The low pressure air on the top of the wing will be trying to draw the lower wing side high pressure air up to the top side....if you prevent that by either a top or bottom seal, I dont think the overall lift of the wing will be altered much. If you allow an air path from the underside to the top of the wing at the root I imagine you will get slightly reduced wing lift plus vortices and turbulence right in front of your prop. I know of at least one designed ultralight that advised its owners to NEVER fly without the wing gap in place...so perhaps there IS a significant effect involved if you modify yours. Have no idea what that will do to the control feel on the tail or the turbulence at the prop, but let us know if it has any noticable effect at all.....your going to be a Test Pilot! My 2 cents, Ray -------- Ray Riverside County, CA Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126989#126989


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:12:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: OSH 2007
    From: "jb92563" <jb92563@yahoo.com>
    Awesome pics. Very cool that you were able to land on the road and check out that huge machine. Thats why I like Kolbs that can land/takeoff just about anywhere theres 300' of sortof flat land....opens up whole new world somewhat like the daring Barnstormers and Bushpilots of an era that has gone before us. I can hardly wait to get my Ultrastar in the air. Ray -------- Ray Riverside County, CA Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=126992#126992


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:20:58 PM PST US
    From: Bob Noyer <a58r@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident
    Pat, Here's from Avweb: "NTSB Update on P-51 Mustang Collision copyright =A9 Larry Grace In a press briefing Saturday afternoon, NTSB air safety inspector Jim Silliman said the Safety Board is still very much in the investigation stage of Friday afternoon's accident involving two P-51 Mustangs participating in the showcase flights at EAA AirVenture. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Gerald Beck, 58, of Wahpeton, N.D., was killed in the fiery crash and Casey Odegaard, 24, of Kindred, N.D., suffered only minor injuries. Silliman said both airplanes were landing on Runway 36L at Oshkosh Wittman Regional Airport when Beck's P-51A hit Odegaard's P-51D from behind before flipping over and catching fire. As expected, several airshow watchers caught the accident on camera or video camcorders, and Silliman said the NTSB is now reviewing a video and several photos submitted to investigators. He said the Safety Board will issue a preliminary report soon, followed by a factual report in about 12 months." I don't know the tail nos, but I read somewhere that the P51A was built by the pilot! regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ do not archive


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:33:43 PM PST US
    From: Michael Sharp <kolbdriver@mlsharp.com>
    Subject: Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident
    Here is a Video of the accident. http://aero-tv.net/index.cfm?do=app.bestView&videoid=00b0d640-e714-4b79-b17b-6f3b0f149c4d Tragic... Mike Bob Noyer <a58r@verizon.net> wrote: Pat, Here's from Avweb: "NTSB Update on P-51 Mustang Collision copyright Larry Grace In a press briefing Saturday afternoon, NTSB air safety inspector Jim Silliman said the Safety Board is still very much in the investigation stage of Friday afternoon's accident involving two P-51 Mustangs participating in the showcase flights at EAA AirVenture. EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said Gerald Beck, 58, of Wahpeton, N.D., was killed in the fiery crash and Casey Odegaard, 24, of Kindred, N.D., suffered only minor injuries. Silliman said both airplanes were landing on Runway 36L at Oshkosh Wittman Regional Airport when Beck's P-51A hit Odegaard's P-51D from behind before flipping over and catching fire. As expected, several airshow watchers caught the accident on camera or video camcorders, and Silliman said the NTSB is now reviewing a video and several photos submitted to investigators. He said the Safety Board will issue a preliminary report soon, followed by a factual report in about 12 months." I don't know the tail nos, but I read somewhere that the P51A was built by the pilot! regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ do not archive


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:38:15 PM PST US
    From: Bob Noyer <a58r@verizon.net>
    Subject: Re: OSH 2007, Meigs arpt, NOT
    Pat, You'd best update yer Microsplat sim, 'cause Meigs was turned into a bulldozer training campus a few yrs ago (in the middle of the night!) by the LessThanHonorable mayor of the city of Big Shoulders, but with a Pinhead for mayor, aka Daily. In happier days I've quit flying at old Meigs when taking kids and visitors to the Rosenwald museum, and the Adler planetarium. regards, Bob N. FireFly 070 Old Kolb http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/ronoy/ do not archive


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:49:34 PM PST US
    Subject: New to the list
    From: "tommy thompson" <soar8hours@yahoo.com>
    I have a Kolb Firestar II with Rotax 447 that's 12 years old :D Check out my blog to see the dolly I designed & made for it. I dislike the full canopy right now in the summer heat [Crying or Very sad] I've made a windscreen [Wink] I also have a set of snow ski's for my Kolb #1044 [Idea] But we don't get hardly any snow here in upper NC anymore [Question] Global warming [Question] Naah... I think maybe the sun is just getting hotter [Exclamation] Or the earth is getting closer to the sun [Shocked] I had tinted canopies on the sailplane I use to own. That and airvents are a needed item as well. This is my first post to this group. Peace [Wink] www.tommythompson.blogspot.com -------- www.tommythompson.blogspot.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127000#127000


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:59 PM PST US
    From: flymichigan@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:20:55 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Kolb tail movement ???
    From: "jb92563" <jb92563@yahoo.com>
    If you check out some of the videos recently uploaded you will see the view "Hunting" back and forth on camera. I presume this is the result of exactly what you are describing. Probably just some prop slipstream turbulence or turbulence from the cockpit enclosure. If its from the Cockpit it will vary more with airspeed but if its from the Prop slipstream it will not vary as much. I fly my glider in aero tow 200' behind a tow plane and I can attest first hand that the prop blast even 200' behind the prop is very turbulent indeed. -------- Ray Riverside County, CA Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127006#127006


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:53:05 PM PST US
    From: Eugene Zimmerman <etzim62@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Back from Oshkosh, P51s' accident
    On Aug 1, 2007, at 4:57 PM, flymichigan@comcast.net wrote: > > Welcome to the matronics glitch. Please try again.


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:00:53 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: New to the list
    From: "planecrazzzy" <planecrazzzy@yahoo.com>
    Hey Tommy, I see you found the place.... This site has "archives" , so if you need to look up info....there's alot to pick from....But you'll notice some "clutter" So if you post something that you think "is not" worth archiving , and concidered "clutter"....Just write , Do not archive , and the system will see that ...... "DNA" , doesn't work... If you notice on the bottom of "my" post , it sez Do Not Archive.... it automaticly puts in on everyone of my posts , because I use it as a signiture....( nothin I say is worth .02 cents ) Gotta Fly... Mike & "Jaz" in MN . . . PS Post some pictures of your plane, we "LIKE" pictures . . . -------- . . . . . Do Not Archive Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127011#127011


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:11:25 PM PST US
    Subject: Oshkosh 2007 - What a Trip!
    From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1@tx.rr.com>
    What a Trip!! I got home last night at 7:50pm after 6 days and 5 nights of fun. I had 2 days at Oshkosh 2007 and had a great time with Donnie, Travis, Dennis, Iziek and Bruce of TNK. I landed at the most northern airport in the Contiguous USA, Northwest Angle, MN (58MN), visited the State Capitol Buildings at Bismark, ND and Pierre, SD. I flew 33.0 hours Burned 184.8 gallons of fuel. Flew 2,458 nm. I had another great time. Photos and videos to follow. -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127013#127013 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0288_283.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0306_211.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0322_158.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0328_965.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/img_0360_199.jpg


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:35:57 PM PST US
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Re: New to the list
    I like your blogspot. Welcome aboard. Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) ----- Original Message ----- From: "tommy thompson" <soar8hours@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:48 PM Subject: Kolb-List: New to the list > > I have a Kolb Firestar II with Rotax 447 that's 12 years old :D Check > out my blog to see the dolly I designed & made for it. I dislike the full > canopy right now in the summer heat [Crying or Very sad] I've made a > windscreen [Wink] I also have a set of snow ski's for my Kolb #1044 > [Idea] But we don't get hardly any snow here in upper NC anymore > [Question] Global warming [Question] Naah... I think maybe the sun is > just getting hotter [Exclamation] Or the earth is getting closer to the > sun [Shocked] I had tinted canopies on the sailplane I use to own. That > and airvents are a needed item as well. This is my first post to this > group. Peace [Wink] > www.tommythompson.blogspot.com > > -------- > www.tommythompson.blogspot.com > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127000#127000 > > >


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:41:50 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Wing strut vibration
    I am getting a rhythmic vibration in my wing struts. I had never noticed until I began trying to video out of the plane. I can stop it by putting my hand on the strut. It is my understanding that TNK has stream lined struts now. Will they stop this strumming? Any help would be appreciated. Larry C do not archive


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:51:19 PM PST US
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    Subject: Non-Kolb related
    Need a favor, maybe somebody will look this up for me - For years there was an ad in the back of various homebuilder magazines by a guy who made a big wooden model jet, and it sat on some telescoping PVC pipe and had valves hooked to the control system. It was a childs toy, you hooked it up to your garden hose, and it would rise and fall and turn. I have lost the url for his web site, can't find it, and can't find any of his ads in any magazines. My grand daughter is the right age for me to build one, and now - zip. Any info appreciated. Thanks, Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) do not archive


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:04:46 PM PST US
    From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com> ................... Will they stop this strumming? Any help would be appreciated. Larry, The answer is yes. I streamlined the struts on the FireFly. See: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly91.html Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN do not archive


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:05:47 PM PST US
    From: flymichigan@comcast.net
    Subject: Re: Non-Kolb related


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:23:33 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    I actually have plastic streamlined fairings for the original round struts. They perhaps are not aligned at the correct angle. Your finding was 6 degrees. The wing is 9 degrees at flight stance. Would this be 6 degrees at flight stance? Larry C > The answer is yes. I streamlined the struts on the FireFly. > > See: > > http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly91.html > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN > > > do not archive > > >


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:09 PM PST US
    From: "Kolbdriver" <kolbdriver@mlsharp.com>
    Subject: Non-Kolb related
    Richard, As with a lot of kit plane plans. Aircraft spruce has taken over!!! http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/kitspages/aquajetx.php Mike Do not archive _____ From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Pike Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:51 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Non-Kolb related Need a favor, maybe somebody will look this up for me - For years there was an ad in the back of various homebuilder magazines by a guy who made a big wooden model jet, and it sat on some telescoping PVC pipe and had valves hooked to the control system. It was a childs toy, you hooked it up to your garden hose, and it would rise and fall and turn. I have lost the url for his web site, can't find it, and can't find any of his ads in any magazines. My grand daughter is the right age for me to build one, and now - zip. Any info appreciated. Thanks, Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) do not archive


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:57 PM PST US
    From: JRatcli256@aol.com
    Subject: Kolb Tailwheel Springs
    Today I received the compression type tailwheel springs ordered from Aircraft Spruce. On comparison with the original Kolb springs they appear to be much stiffer and heavier. I know how to make my own springs, as some on the list have done in the past. Before I return them and make my own, is/has anyone ever used the springs from Aircraft Spruce? And with what results? Although much heavier weight wise, would the additional stiffness be of any advantage control wise? John Ratcliffe Mark3X http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:31 PM PST US
    From: JRatcli256@aol.com
    Subject: Registration to Inspection Time Laps
    When I register my build, is there any limit on the amount of time between registration and getting the plane inspected? John Ratcliffe Mark3X http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:21:38 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Kolb Tailwheel Springs
    | | Before I return them and make my own, is/has anyone ever used the springs | from Aircraft Spruce? And with what results? Although much heavier weight wise, | would the additional stiffness be of any advantage control wise? | | | John Ratcliffe John R: I use compression springs from Maule Aircraft. Used them with the 6" solid tire and 8" Tundra Tailwheel. Been using these for years. I prefer them over the feel I get when I fly the factory Kolbs with soft springs. john h


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:25:49 PM PST US
    Subject: The Truth about the SP-LSA rule
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    Not explicitly Kolb related but worth reading. I just got the following from a reliable source. So those of you who think that the FAA will not be enforcing the new rule after the deadline may want to re-think that a bit. The whole justification for the SP/LSA (and only way it could be sold to the FAA) was to regulate the illegal, unregistered heavy UL type aircraft and un-certificated pilots. Here it is: Letter from Earl Lawrence EAA Vice President Industry and Regulatory Affairs (920) 426 6522 Dear .....: This is a good question and you have not seen an answer because the answer is; "Because that is the way it is." Of course there is more to the story and I will share my opinions as an individual who worked with the FAA on this rulemaking from 1994 until today. But, I must stress it is just that my opinion/perspective not necessarily the facts, not because there are not facts but because with many things in life there are many perspectives of the situation. First when looking at your question you need to remove yourself from any current realities or perspectives of the rule as it is today. You need to look at the rule from how it was proposed, or the "selling points" needed to get a new rule. Foremost in looking at this question one must understand that the new rule has NOTHING (I cannot stress this enough) to do about a simpler pilot certificate. You read that correct. The proposal has nothing to do at all about a simpler pilot certificate or a no medical certificate. If one had proposed rulemaking on a simpler easier pilot certificate the FAA, the DOT, NTSB, and most pilot groups would have opposed the proposal (including pilot and instructor associations). There are many who still believe that there should not be a sport pilot certificate and everyone should get a private pilot certificate. Now do not get me wrong. EAA did see the potential of this new rule to get more people in the air, but if we have used that point at all, the SP/LSA rule would have NEVER been considered. If you notice during the years we worked on the proposed rule, there was lots of pictures of very open ultralights shown in magazine articles and other promotional materials. This was by design. The campaign to get the rule was about getting "these untrained and undocumented dangerous ultralight pilots out of the air." This was an argument that FAA, NTSB, DOT, Homeland Security and Congress was very interested in. The sport pilot rule was written to create a pilot certificate for ultralight pilots because they were unregulated at the time. If we had shown pictures of aircraft with closed cockpits, the powers that controlled the process would have said "that is a REAL airplane" and they need a "real" pilot certificate. So those of us who were trying to get the new rule passed spent time convincing the authorities that the new Sport Pilot was not going to be flying a "real" airplane, so that we could get the rule passed. Also, we needed to convince the government that this was NOT about a pilot certificate without a medical. We had to be able to show that a large number of current pilots were NOT going to drop their medical and fly as sport pilots as that would be "a reduction in safety" and FAA, DOT, NTSB would oppose such a move. The original proposal was for aircraft that were no more than 600 pounds, then over time the weight increased to 900, 1232, and finally 1320. The last change was literally in the dark of night by friends of EAA and sport aviation who understood that we really did want a alternative to the private pilot license, but we could not say that publicly or even to our fellow pilot associations as it would have been opposed. One has to understand that EAA had to work VERY hard to get the industry associations to not oppose the Sport pilot rule. Many of the traditionalists saw the rule as a threat and a step backward for aviation. So the argument all along was to create a pilot certificate and aircraft certification category to regulate the "illegal ultralights and pilots." If the industry or many in government had understood our alternative reasons for the rule, the proposal would have been dead on delivery. We have sport pilot today because we have good friends in the FAA, particularly the Administrators that oversaw this effort, and EAA could manage to keep industry from opposing the effort. We did this by campaigning on an "increase of safety and regulation for ultralights," not a reduction of safety for current pilots and aircraft. (note: To many in government Regulation and safety is one in the same) Because of these arguments and the need to separate this rulemaking effort from "reducing regulation/safety of current pilots and aircraft" and convincing everyone that this was an "increase of regulation/safety for ultralights," it was necessary to ensure that no large groups of existing aircraft would fall into the new category. The sport pilot certificate was sold on the basis that an "ultralight" pilot was going to use this certificate to fly an aircraft with no radios and no instruments, day VFR, in G airspace, carrying one passenger. So it was necessary to exclude as many current pilots and aircraft in order to get the regulation passed. (Blame it on politics, but that is the real world.) Regarding affordability, current pilots say that the new regulation did not result in any improvements in affordability. The facts are the new aircraft are less than half the cost of a comparative new (Its not fair to compare a 1950 aircraft with a 2007 aircraft) type certificated aircraft and the sport pilot certificate is less than half the cost of a private pilot certificate. So for the new person getting involved in aviation has become more accessible. The big problem today is access to a Light Sport Aircraft. EAA understands this, but we had to start somewhere. Every day more light sport aircraft are produced and sold, which means everyday there is more opportunity to own one. There are currently over 50 models of new light sport aircraft for sale. Used aircraft are starting to come up for sale at considerable lower cost than new aircraft. It is expected that Cessna will soon start to produce a light sport aircraft. Cessna pilot centers will start to have aircraft to train new sport pilots in, and like it was in the 1970's these aircraft will be sold after a couple of years to the students at much reduced costs as used airplanes as the Centers must purchase new aircraft every two years. As you may noticed, this is all about the future. The rule was written about the future and not current pilots and aircraft. Again if that had been the proposal, there would be no new rule. For existing pilots, sport pilot does not offer a tremendous amount of benefit as they have already made the investment in training and possibly in an aircraft purchase. This is about the future and getting new pilots and new aircraft into the system. I hope this helps with understanding how we arrived at the current situation. Sincerely, Earl Lawrence EAA VP Industry and Regulatory Affairs (920) 426 6522 -------- Thom in Buffalo N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- &quot;Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.&quot; Albert Einstein Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127060#127060


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:30:33 PM PST US
    From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    I actually have plastic streamlined fairings for the original round struts. They perhaps are not aligned at the correct angle. Your finding was 6 degrees. The wing is 9 degrees at flight stance. Would this be 6 degrees at flight stance? Larry, I built a meter (http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly55.html) so I could determine the FireFly angle of attack at cruise. It came out at six degrees, ans so that is what I used. The basic configuration has not changed for some time and can be seen on the bottom of: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly.html The only angle in doubt is thrust angle. I may have changed it and not up dated the drawing. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN Do not archive.


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:32:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    Ray, I don't know about others, but the lower camber of the wing over the cage is wide open and air enters over the full enclosure windshield, below the leading edge of the gap seal and escapes wherever it can, which is currently below the wings just above the cage, if that is a low pressure area. If anything, I would think that opening up the top aft half of the wing there, will allow better airflow through that area. -------- Thom in Buffalo N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- &quot;Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.&quot; Albert Einstein Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127062#127062


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:39:21 PM PST US
    From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    I actually have plastic streamlined fairings for the original round struts. They perhaps are not aligned at the correct angle. Your finding was 6 degrees. The wing is 9 degrees at flight stance. Would this be 6 degrees at flight stance? Larry, I have thought about this some more. You are able to put much in much more power and speed into the strut than I can with my FireFly. Do you notice if the strumming goes away when you slow down to say 60 mph? If so there is a good chance the preformed/shaped aluminum struts may do the trick. They should have higher stiffness. Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN Do not archive.


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:13 PM PST US
    From: gary aman <gaman@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    On my Firestar,I found the vibration to be engine-prop related,not air load. From: "Larry Cottrell" ................... Will they stop this strumming? Any help would be appreciated. Larry, The answer is yes. I streamlined the struts on the FireFly. See: http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly91.html Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester, IN do not archive


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:12 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1@tx.rr.com>
    Larry and All, I had the same lift strut harmonic vibration on the Kolbra when I did the first few flights with the streamlined plastic fairings on. It would only occur at a very narrow airspeed band about 90 mph. I installed the TNK fairings and have never had the vibration again. As for the angle the fairings were set at, I just eyeballed them to and angle that looked okay. John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS, 1,463 hours and counting -------- John Williamson Arlington, TX Kolbra, 912ULS http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127079#127079


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:17 PM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Wing root gap seal on FS I
    I fly my firestar without a gap seal on real hot days it really dont make much difference on how it flys Ellery N447EB do not archive ************************************** all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:36:08 PM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Kolb Tailwheel Springs
    John I use the Aircraft Spruce compression springs. I have fitted them loose so that they don't add stress to the rudder system. The springs give you the ability to more positively control the plane. The most important feature is that a cross wind will not allow these springs to deflect to the point were the tail wheel will unlock to full swivel as long as you maintain control of the rudder. Yes I like them. You may have to adjust the geometry a bit to allow the tail wheel to unlock properly at full rudder deflection. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: JRatcli256@aol.com To: Kolb-List@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:01 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Kolb Tailwheel Springs Today I received the compression type tailwheel springs ordered from Aircraft Spruce. On comparison with the original Kolb springs they appear to be much stiffer and heavier. I know how to make my own springs, as some on the list have done in the past. Before I return them and make my own, is/has anyone ever used the springs from Aircraft Spruce? And with what results? Although much heavier weight wise, would the additional stiffness be of any advantage control wise? John Ratcliffe Mark3X ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- lcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982" href="http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000 000982" target="_blank">AOL.com.


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:18:22 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: Wing strut vibration
    My vibration is in the 56 to 64 MPH range, or most likely all through all the speed that I can stay in the air. I notice it most in the 6000 rpm range. I also had it without the plastic cover so I am sure that it is just that the round struts do not have the rigidity that the streamlined metal ones do. Thanks for the help. Now for some creative financial planning. Larry C ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Williamson" <kolbrapilot1@tx.rr.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:41 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Wing strut vibration > <kolbrapilot1@tx.rr.com> > > Larry and All, > > I had the same lift strut harmonic vibration on the Kolbra when I did the > first few flights with the streamlined plastic fairings on. It would only > occur at a very narrow airspeed band about 90 mph. I installed the TNK > fairings and have never had the vibration again. > > As for the angle the fairings were set at, I just eyeballed them to and > angle that looked okay. > > John Williamson > Arlington, TX > > Kolbra, 912ULS, 1,463 hours and counting > > -------- > John Williamson > Arlington, TX > > Kolbra, 912ULS > http://home.tx.rr.com/kolbrapilot > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=127079#127079 > > >


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:01:50 PM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Official Kolb-List FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
    Dear Listers, Please read over the Kolb-List Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) below. The complete Kolb-List FAQ including the Usage Guidelines can be found at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/Kolb-List.FAQ.html Thank you, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator [ Note: This FAQ was designed to be displayed with a fixed width font such as Courier. Proportional fonts will cause display formatting errors. ] This FAQ can also be viewed in HTML online at the following address: http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm ************************************************************ ******* LIST POLICIES AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ******* ************************************************************ PLEASE READ. This document contains Kolb-List policies and information for new and old subscribers. Understanding the Kolb-List policies will minimize problems for the Administrator, and will help keep the Kolb-List running smoothly for all of us. ****************************************** *** Quick Start Guide to List Features *** ****************************************** There are many features available on the Matronics Email Lists and each one is described in detailed below. However, using the List Navigator you can quickly access the complete set of features available for this List. The List Navigator can be found at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List **************************************** *** How to Subscribe and Unsubscribe *** **************************************** Simply go to the Web Page shown below and enter your email address and select the List(s) that you wish to subscribe or unsubscribed from. You may also use the handy "Find" function to determine the exact syntax of your email address as it is subscribed to the List. Please see the complete instructions at the top of the Web Page for more information. The Subscribe/Unsubscribe web page is: http://www.matronics.com/subscribe Note that you will receive TWO conformation emails regarding your subsciption process. The first verifies that your subscription/unsubsciption request was received, and the second confirms that the process has been completed. You should receive the first email within a few minutes of your request. The second conformation will arrive in less than 24 hours. You cannot post until you receive the second conformation email message. ***************************** *** How to Post a Message *** ***************************** Send an email message to: kolb-list@matronics.com Your message will be redistributed to everyone currently subscribed to the List. ***************************************************** *** SPAM Fighter - You Must be Subscribed to Post *** ***************************************************** When a new post is received by the system, the From: line of the message is checked and compared against the current subscription list. If the email address is found, the message is passed on to the List Processor. If the email address isn't found in the current list of subscribers, it is dumped. This serves to very effectively thwart 99% of the SPAM that gets posted to the Lists. Remember, however, that the syntax of your email address is very important with regard to the configuration of your email application such as Outlook or Eudora. For example, the following two email addresses may be functionally equivalent, but only one would pass the Matronics Email SPAM test depending on which was syntax was subscribed to the given List: smith@machine.domain.com smith@domain.com Either email address syntax is alright, just be sure that you configure your email application to match *exactly* the address you've subscibed to the List. ************************************** *** Enclosure Support on the Lists *** ************************************** Limited posting of enclosures such as pictures, documents, and spreadsheets is supported on the Lists. There are a number of restrictions, and these are detailed below. Please abide by the rules put forth regarding the content of enclosures. These are some of the features and limits of enclosures on the Matronics Lists: 1) Enclosures will only be posted to the Real Time version of the Lists. 2) Enclosures will NOT be included in the Daily Digest version of the Lists. 3) Enclosures WILL BE forwarded on to the BBS Forum Web site. 4) Enclosures will NOT be appended to the Archives. 5) Enclosures will NOT be available in the List Browse feature. 6) Only the following file types and extensions will be allowed: bmp doc dwg dxf gif jpg pdf png txt xls All other enclosures types will be rejected and email returned to sender. The enclosure types listed above are relatively safe from a virus standpoint and don't pose a particularly large security risk. 7) !! All incoming enclosures will be scanned for viruses prior to posting to the List. This is done in real time and will not slow down the process of posting the message !! Here are some rules for posting enclosures. Failure to abide by these rules could result in the removal of a subscriber's email address from the Lists. 1) Pay attention to what you are posting!! Make sure that the files you are enclosing aren't HUGE (greater that 1MB). Remember that there are still people checking they're email via dial up modem. If you post 30MB worth of pictures, you are placing an unnecessary burden on these folks and the rest of us, for that matter. 2) SCALE YOUR PICTURES DOWN!!! I don't want to see huge 3000 x 2000 pictures getting posted that are 3 or 4MB each. This is just unacceptable. Use a program such as Photoshop to scale the picture down to something on the order of 800 x 600 and try to keep the file size to less-than 200KB, preferably much less. Microsoft has a really awesome utility available for free that allows you to Right-Click on a picture in Explorer and automatically scale it down and resave it. This is a great utility - get it, use it! http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx Look for the link "Image Resizer" 3) !! This would seem to go without saying, but I'll say it anyway. Do not post anything that would be considered offensive by your grandmother. And you know what I'm saying; I don't want to see anything even questionable. !! 4) REMEMBER THIS: If you post a 1MB enclosure to a List with 1000 members subscribed, your 1MB enclosure must be resent 1000 times amounting to 1MB X 1000 = 1 Gigabyte of network traffic!! BE CAREFUL and BE COURTEOUS! Also see the section below on the Matronics Photo and File Share where you can have your files and photos posted on the Matronics web server for long time viewing and availability. ******************* *** Digest Mode *** ******************* Each day, starting at 12 midnight PST US, a new 'digest' will be started. This digest will contain the same information that is currently appended to the archive file. It has all of the headers except for the "From:" and "Subject:" lines removed, and includes a message separator consisting of a line of underscores. Each day at 23:55 PST US, the day's messages as described above will be combined and sent as a single message to everyone on the digest email list. To subscribe to the digest list, use the same subscription web form described above, and just select the Digest version of the List. http://www.matronics.com/subscribe Note that you *can* be subscribed to both the realtime and digest versions of the List at the same time. This is perfectly acceptable. Now some caveats: * Messages sent to "kolb-list-digest" will be forwarded to the standard email list. In other words, you cannot post messages only to the digest List. * If you are subscribed to both the regular List and the digest List, you will receive the realtime postings as well as the digest at the end of the day. * If you reply to the digest email, your message will be forwarded to the normal list associated with the digest. Important Note: Please change the subject line to reflect the topic of your response! Also, please *do not include all or most of the digest in your reply*. **************************** *** List Digest Browser *** **************************** An archive of all the List Digests can be found online in either plain text or HTML format. These archives contain the exact Digest that was posted to the Digest email list on the given day. The Digest Archives can be found at the following location: http://www.matronics.com/digest ***************************************** *** The "DO NOT ARCHIVE" Message Flag *** ***************************************** At times, your message may concern something that is revelent only to a very small number of persons or to a limited area, and you may not wish to archive it. In such a case, simply put the following phrase anywhere in the message: do not archive Your message will not be appended to the archive, but will be sent to List email distribution as normal. ********************************************** ***** READ THIS - Automatic Unsubscribes ***** ********************************************** Note that if your email address begins to cause problems such as bounced email, mailbox is filled, or any other errors, your address will be promptly removed from the List. If you discover that you are no longer receiving messages from the Kolb-List, go to the following Web page, and look for your email address and a possible reason for your removal. The Matronics Email List uses utility called the "Email Weasel" that automatically looks though the day's bounced email for addresses that caused problems due to common things like "user is unknown", "mailbox full", etc. If the Email Weasel removes your email address from the Lists you will find record of it at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/unsubscribed If the problem listed on the web site above has been resolved, please feel free to resubscribe to the Lists of your choice. ******************************* *** List Member Information *** ******************************* If you have not done so already, please email me your phone numbers and paper mail address in the following format: smith@somehost.com Joe Smith 123 Airport Lane Tower, CA 91234-1234 098-765-1234 w 123-456-7890 h Please forward this information to the following email address: requests@matronics.com I have a file of such things, that I typically use to contact you when there are problems with your email address. The information will NOT be used for any other commercial purpose. **************************************** *** Realtime Web Email List Browsing *** **************************************** Recent messages posted to the Kolb-List are also made available on the Web for realtime browsing. Seven days worth of back postings are available with this feature. The messages can be sorted by Subject, Author, Date, or Message Thread. The Realtime List Browser indexes are updated twice per hour at xx:15 and xx:45. You can also reply to a message or start a new message directly from the List Browser Interface (coming soon). You do not have to be subscribed to the given list to use the List Browser Interface in view-mode. http://www.matronics.com/browselist/kolb-list ******************************************* *** Web Forums Bulletin Board Interface *** ******************************************* A phpBB BBS web Forums front end is available for all Kolb-List content. content. The Forums contain all of the same content available via the email distribution and found on the various archive viewing formats such as the List Browse, etc. Any posts on the web Forums will be cross posted to the respective email List, and posts to the Email List will be cross posted to the web Forums. You may view all List content on the Forums without any special login. If you wish to post a message via the Web Forum interface, however, you will need to Register. This is a simple process that takes only a few minutes. A link to the Registration page can be found at the top of the main web Forums page. Note that registering on the Forum web site also enables you to send email posts to the Lists as well. You will also need to Subscribe to the respective Email List as described above to receive the Email Distribution of the List, however. The Matroincs Email List Web BBS Forums can be found at the following URL: http://forums.matronics.com ********************************* *** Matronics Email List Wiki *** ********************************* In an attempt to make it easy to store and find structured and often accessed information, Matronics has installed a Wiki at: http://wiki.matronics.com The Wiki allows individuals to create web pages to contain useful information for other users of the mailing lists and web site. Unlike an ordinary web page where the content needs to be submitted to Matronics for inclusion, the Wiki permits the users to construct their own pages and have them visible immediately. While constructing pages for the Wiki is not difficult, some may not be comfortable building pages. In that case, simply prepare the text and any images and email it to: wiki-support@matronics.com One of the volunteers on that list will take your submission and construct a Wiki page for you. Often someone produces a particularly useful posting in email one one of the Lists that would be of general interest. In that case Matronics may take that post and convert it into a Wiki page. ********************* *** List Archives *** ********************* A file containing of all of the previous postings to the Kolb-List is available on line. The archive file information is available via the Web and FTP in a number of forms. Each are briefly described below: * Kolb-List.FAQ - Latest version of the Kolb-List Frequently Asked Question page (this document). * Kolb-Archive.digest.complete - Complete file with most of the email header info removed and page breaks inserted between messages. * Kolb-Archive.digest.vol-?? - Same as the file above, but broken up into small sections that can more easily handled. * Kolb-Archive.digest.complete.zip - Same as the Kolb-Archive.digest.complete file above, but in PKZIP format. Use "binary" data transfer methods. * Kolb-Archive.digest.complete.Z - Same as the Kolb-Archive.digest.complete file above, but in UNIX compress format. Use "binary" data transfer methods. Download Via FTP ---------------- The archive file is available via anonymous FTP from ftp.matronics.com in the "/pub/Archives" directory. It is updated daily and can be found in a number of formats as described above. (All filenames are case sensitive.) ftp://ftp.matronics.com/pub/Archives Download Via Web ---------------- The archives are also available via a web listing. These can be found toward the bottom of the following web page: http://www.matronics.com/archives ****************************************** *** Complete List Web Archive Browsing *** ****************************************** All messages posted to the Kolb-List are also available using the Email List Archive Browsing feature. With this utility, all messages in the List are indexed, and individual sub-archives can be browsed. http://www.matronics.com/archive/archive-index.cgi?Kolb ***************************************** **** High-Speed Archive Search Engine *** ***************************************** You can use the custom, high-performance Matronics Email List Search Engine to quickly locate and browse any messages that have been posted to the List. The Engine allows the user to easily search any of the currently available List archives. http://www.matronics.com/search **************************** *** File and Photo Share *** **************************** With the Matronics Email List File and Photo Share you can share pictures and other data with members of the List without having to forward a copy of it to everyone. To share your Files and Photos, simply email them to: pictures@matronics.com !! ==> Please including the following information with each submission: 1) Email Lists that they are related to. 2) Your Full Name. 3) Your Email Address. 4) One line Subject description. 5) Multi-line, multi-paragraph description of topic. 6-x) One-line Description of each photo or file Prior to public availability of the files and photos, each will be scanned for viruses. Please also note that the process of making the files and photos available on the web site is a pseudo-manual process, and I try to process them every few days. Following the availability of the new Photoshare, an email message will be sent to the Email Lists enumerated in 1) above indicating that the new Share is available and what the direct URL to it is. For a current list of available Photoshares, have a look at the Main Index Page: http://www.matronics.com/photoshare ************************** *** List Archive CDROM *** ************************** A complete Matronics Email List Archive CD is available that contains all of the archives since the beginning of each of the Lists. The archives for all of the Lists are included on the CD along with a freeware search engine written by a list member. The CD is burned the day you order it and will contain archive received up to the last minute. They make great gifts! http://www.matronics.com/ArchiveCDROM ********************************** *** List Support Contributions *** ********************************** The Matronics Lists are run *completely* through the support of it members. You won't find any PopUpAds, flashing Banner ads, or any other form of annoying commercialism on either the Email Messages or the List web pages associated with the Matronics Email Lists. Every year during November I run a low-key, low-pressure "Fund Raiser" where, throughout the month, I ask List members to make a Contribution in any amount with which they are comfortable. I will often offer free gifts with certain contribution levels during the Fund Raiser to increase the participation. The gifts are usually donated by companies that are themselves List members. Your Contributions go directly to supporting the operation of the Lists including the high-speed, business-class Internet connection, server system hardware and software upgrades, and to partially offset the many many hours I spend running, maintaining, upgrading, and developing the variety of services found here. Generally Contributions range from $20 to $100 and are completely voluntary and non-compulsory. I ask only that if person enjoys the Lists and obtains value from them, that they make a Contribution of equal magnitude. Contributions are accepted throughout the year, and if you've just subscribed, feel free to make a Contribution when you've settled in. The website for making SSL Secure Contributions is listed below. There are a variety of payment methods including Visa and MasterCard, PayPal, and sending a personal check. If you enjoy and value the List, won't you make a Contribution today to support its continued operation? http://www.matronics.com/contributions Thank you! Matt Dralle Email List Administrator ****************************************************************************** Kolb-List Usage Guidelines ****************************************************************************** The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the Kolb-List. You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules therein. Failure to use the Kolb-List in the manner described below may result in the removal of the subscribers from the List. Kolb-List Policy Statement The purpose of the Kolb-List is to provide a forum of discussion for things related to this particular discussion group. The List's goals are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie among its members; and to support safe operation. Reaching these goals requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of the List. To this end, the following guidelines have been established: - Please keep all posts related to the List at some level. Do not submit posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc. - THINK carefully before you write. Ask yourself if your post will be relevant to everyone. If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it. - Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate. Try to be concise and terse in your posts. Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and responses. - Keep your signature brief. Please include your name, email address, aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location. A short line about where you are in the building process is also nice. Avoid bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary space in the archive. - DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is easily obtainable from other widely available sources. Consult the web page or FAQ first. - If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of your response the same as that of the original post. This makes it easy to find threads in the archive. - When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your response. DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the reader to the topic at hand, but be selective. The impact that quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive can not be overstated! - When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT then go ahead and reply to the List. Be aware that clicking the "reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your response to the original poster. You might have to actively address your response with the original poster's email address. - DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal. "Way to go!", "I agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large. - When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly contribute something valuable. - Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone polite and respectful. Don't make snide comments, personally attack other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously controversial issue. This will only cause a pointless debate that will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing. - Occassional posts by vendors or individuals who are regularyly subscribed to a given List are considered acceptable. Posts by List members promoting their respective products or items for sale should be of a friendly, informal nature, and should not resemble a typical SPAM message. The List isn't about commercialism, but is about sharing information and knowledge. This applies to everyone, including those who provide products to the entire community. Informal presentation and moderation should be the operatives with respect to advertising on the Lists. ------- [This is an automated posting.] do not archive


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:04:42 PM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Official Kolb-List Usage Guidelines
    Dear Listers, Please read over the Kolb-List Usage Guidelines below. The complete Kolb-List FAQ including these Usage Guidelines can be found at the following URL: http://www.matronics.com/FAQs/Kolb-List.FAQ.html Thank you, Matt Dralle Matronics Email List Administrator ****************************************************************************** Kolb-List Usage Guidelines ****************************************************************************** The following details the official Usage Guidelines for the Kolb-List. You are encouraged to read it carefully, and to abide by the rules therein. Failure to use the Kolb-List in the manner described below may result in the removal of the subscribers from the List. Kolb-List Policy Statement The purpose of the Kolb-List is to provide a forum of discussion for things related to this particular discussion group. The List's goals are to serve as an information resource to its members; to deliver high-quality content; to provide moral support; to foster camaraderie among its members; and to support safe operation. Reaching these goals requires the participation and cooperation of each and every member of the List. To this end, the following guidelines have been established: - Please keep all posts related to the List at some level. Do not submit posts concerning computer viruses, urban legends, random humor, long lost buddies' phone numbers, etc. etc. - THINK carefully before you write. Ask yourself if your post will be relevant to everyone. If you have to wonder about that, DON'T send it. - Remember that your post will be included for posterity in an archive that is growing in size at an extraordinary rate. Try to be concise and terse in your posts. Avoid overly wordy and lengthy posts and responses. - Keep your signature brief. Please include your name, email address, aircraft type/tail number, and geographic location. A short line about where you are in the building process is also nice. Avoid bulky signatures with character graphics; they consume unnecessary space in the archive. - DON'T post requests to the List for information when that info is easily obtainable from other widely available sources. Consult the web page or FAQ first. - If you want to respond to a post, DO keep the "Subject:" line of your response the same as that of the original post. This makes it easy to find threads in the archive. - When responding, NEVER quote the *entire* original post in your response. DO use lines from the original post to help "tune in" the reader to the topic at hand, but be selective. The impact that quoting the entire original post has on the size of the archive can not be overstated! - When the poster asks you to respond to him/her personally, DO NOT then go ahead and reply to the List. Be aware that clicking the "reply" button on your mail package does not necessarily send your response to the original poster. You might have to actively address your response with the original poster's email address. - DO NOT use the List to respond to a post unless you have something to add that is relevant and has a broad appeal. "Way to go!", "I agree", and "Congratulations" are all responses that are better sent to the original poster directly, rather than to the List at large. - When responding to others' posts, avoid the feeling that you need to comment on every last point in their posts, unless you can truly contribute something valuable. - Feel free to disagree with other viewpoints, BUT keep your tone polite and respectful. Don't make snide comments, personally attack other listers, or take the moral high ground on an obviously controversial issue. This will only cause a pointless debate that will hurt feelings, waste bandwidth and resolve nothing. - Occassional posts by vendors or individuals who are regularyly subscribed to a given List are considered acceptable. Posts by List members promoting their respective products or items for sale should be of a friendly, informal nature, and should not resemble a typical SPAM message. The List isn't about commercialism, but is about sharing information and knowledge. This applies to everyone, including those who provide products to the entire community. Informal presentation and moderation should be the operatives with respect to advertising on the Lists. ------- [This is an automated posting.] do not archive




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --