Kolb-List Digest Archive

Wed 10/15/08


Total Messages Posted: 22



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:07 AM - Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video (Thom Riddle)
     2. 05:53 AM - Re: CT MKIII crash (olendorf)
     3. 07:31 AM - Quiet Kolb (robcannon)
     4. 07:51 AM - Re: CT MKIII crash (grantr)
     5. 08:21 AM - Gascolator chat  (Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL)
     6. 10:30 AM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (pj.ladd)
     7. 10:55 AM - Re: Re: HKs Twinstar with vg's (pj.ladd)
     8. 11:07 AM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (pj.ladd)
     9. 11:19 AM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
    10. 11:55 AM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (pj.ladd)
    11. 01:17 PM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (pj.ladd)
    12. 01:38 PM - Re: LSA (Was Airport Attitudes) (pj.ladd)
    13. 01:39 PM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash ()
    14. 02:43 PM - Re: Quiet Kolb (JetPilot)
    15. 02:47 PM - Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video (JetPilot)
    16. 02:52 PM - Gerry Olenik of Green Sky Aviation (robcannon)
    17. 03:14 PM - Re: CT MKIII crash (Richard Pike)
    18. 04:02 PM - Re: LSA (Was Airport Attitudes) (Dana Hague)
    19. 04:02 PM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (Dana Hague)
    20. 05:25 PM - Re: Gerry Olenik of Green Sky Aviation (lucien)
    21. 06:05 PM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (Larry Cottrell)
    22. 07:19 PM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:07:50 AM PST US
    From: "Thom Riddle" <cfi.sportpilot@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video
    Thanks, George. Keying in the tags you mentioned brought up the video directly. Nice stuff and the vibes are not bad.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:53:41 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    From: "olendorf" <olendorf@gmail.com>
    Good to know it works. I have a 1 foot piece of tubing coming off of a T that is used to drain the tank also. I've never seen a single drop of water in any samples I've taken from that. I only test it every other month or so. But I always fill the float bowl and check it before each flight. Never found any water in that either. I am now checking it after each flight also since I'm now emptying the bowl back into the tank so I don't have stale fuel in there. I do this if I'm not going to be flying for a week or more. The 10% ethanol fuel left over for 2 weeks in the bowl won't start the engine. It goes bad very quickly compared to regular gas which I used to let go for weeks sometimes. Funny story. I was at the field a few years ago and one of the guys come to fly his Challenger. He took off and came back within 5 minutes. He said his engine was running rough. He suspected that the fuel he just put in may have had water in it. He said "I left it out last night and it rained. I didn't have the spout covered". Which of course he knew as he was filling the tank. That same guy was following me to another airport 10 miles away. His instructor said to him "Follow Scott, he'll show you how to get there". So after 8 miles or so I get a call on the radio from the guy, "I'm right behind you and getting closer. What do I do?" I said, "TURN". A third guy in the group said "He's RIGHT behind you". He was following me all right. I went full throttle all the way through the pattern and landed as far down the runway as I could. Last time I flew with him. lcottrell wrote: > > I know it is not as effective as a real live gascolator, but it works for me, and that is what counts. > > As long as I don't get lazy and fail to do a good fuel sample each time I fly and when I refuel, I don't think I will ever have another fuel problem cause an engine out. > > [b] -------- Scott Olendorf Original Firestar, Rotax 447, Powerfin prop Schenectady, NY http://KolbFirestar.googlepages.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8868#208868


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:31:25 AM PST US
    Subject: Quiet Kolb
    From: "robcannon" <leecannon@telus.net>
    As some of you may know, I installed a hks ,3:47, four blade powerfin, in my Twinstar with the attempt to make a plane that my noise sensitive runway owner would accept. I flew it out of my home strip for the first time last night and got the double thumbs up from the runway owner and closest neighbor!!! It has enough power that next flight I will do a reduced power climb and be even quieter! The people watching my take off said it was quieter than the 85 hp Fleet Canuck that flys regularly out of here (my goal was to be as quit as him) I anticipated poor performance in either climb or cruise, and although I realize performance is somewhat subjective, I am very happy with both. It climbs at close to 1000 ' per min. and will accelerate in level flight much faster than I care to go (80mph). Conclusion: I believe the hks is ideally suited for replacing the 503 or 582, and I now feel it would have enough power for a light Mark 3, as my heavy twinstar has abundant power, even with the lower performance of the 4 blade prop. Rob Cannon ps. if anyone has any questions on the hks/kolb install I would be happy to help. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8883#208883 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/aug_08_002_188.jpg


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:51:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25@yahoo.com>
    It sounds like about anything will do the job so I think I am going with something like this: http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg13.html Simple cheap and effective! I could probably make a better one out of some pvc or galvanized pipe from lowes. using a t fitting to rune 2 fuel barbs and a pipe on the bottom of the T as the sump for the water. Anyone know how gasoline affects pvc? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8885#208885


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:21:30 AM PST US
    Subject: Gascolator chat
    From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil>
    << Make your pickup/finger strainer a couple inches above the lowest point of the tank, and the sump drain at the lowest point. Instant gascolator. Richard Pike >> Hey, Old Poops - Nice to have you back! I've missed your contributions to our List. Dennis Kirby New Mexico Do not archive


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:30:25 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    would my plane even benefit from having one?>> Nah!!. Stop worrying. Always leave your fuel tanks topped up and there is no room for condensation to form. Use a water filtering funnel when you refuel, if you are worried about buying fuel with water in it. Empty you carb. chamber occasionally, evry year or so, and you will be right. You can get too hung up on all the little things that can go wrong until you have redundancy built in all over the place. Where are you going to stop?. All this fuss a few weeks ago about fitting an extra fuel pump. What for? Just look at the figurs. How many planes have had trouible with pump failure? There are all sorts of stories about someone who knew someone who had a failure but little first hand reporting. Of course it DOES happen but if it was likely to happen regularly a) the manufacturer would fit two pumps and b) the insurance company would load your premium if you only had one. Cool it and go with the flow, man Cheers Pat


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:55:18 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: HKs Twinstar with vg's
    If it was unsafe, I would surely run right out and buy a set of VG's for her.>> Hi John, of course you would and so would everyone else. I don`t think anyone has ever suggested that our planes are unsafe without VG`s. Just that with them they are, maybe, just a little safer. "In what way?" I am not even going down that road. Its been done to death Cheers Pat


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:07:06 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    Not one of my civil liberties has been curtailed...none. Not even privacy. >> Hi Jim, mine has. I lost 2 perfectly good Swiss Army pocket knives because I had forgotten to pack them in my luggage and carried them in my pocket. Which I have done for 70 years.. You don`t think that the government being able to pin point where you made a cell phone call from and who you spoke to is an invasion pf privacy.?. You dont think that the fact that there is CCTV footage of you carrying on your lawful business in the hands of all sorts of agencies is an invasion of privacy? I do. 1984? You `aint seen nothin` yet. (but its all for your protection) Cheers Pat


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:19:23 AM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    Pat You are too used to being protected by your federal air nanny. In the early days of aviation we didn't have the knowledge we have today. There were alot of forced landings and worse. Most of us have learned from these problems and build in some safe guards to protect ourselves and our mistresses er... a... airplanes. Granted we all have to weigh the cost in dollars/uros and weight against the odds but to just say naw just go with the flow is not good advice. When I was flying a $3,000 dollar Weedhopper with a 2 stroking time bomb in front of me it didn't make alot of sense to build in very much redundancy. Now that I fly a Kolb with a bullet proof airframe and a very reliable VW engine it makes sense to me to spend $30 for a gascolator and about the same for a boost pump. I'm also a bit older and not as invincible as I used to think I was. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: CT MKIII crash > > would my plane even benefit from having one?>> > > Nah!!. Stop worrying. Always leave your fuel tanks topped up and there is > no room for condensation to form. Use a water filtering funnel when you > refuel, if you are worried about buying fuel with water in it. Empty you > carb. chamber occasionally, evry year or so, and you will be right. > > You can get too hung up on all the little things that can go wrong until > you have redundancy built in all over the place. Where are you going to > stop?. > All this fuss a few weeks ago about fitting an extra fuel pump. What for? > Just look at the figurs. How many planes have had trouible with pump > failure? There are all sorts of stories about someone who knew someone who > had a failure but little first hand reporting. > Of course it DOES happen but if it was likely to happen regularly a) the > manufacturer would fit two pumps and b) the insurance company would load > your premium if you only had one. > > Cool it and go with the flow, man > > Cheers > > Pat > > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:55:09 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    You are too used to being protected by your federal air nanny. >> Hi Rick, my post was a bit tongue in cheek but I am sure that our `Federal air nanny` as you call our flriendly and helpful CAA and Microlight Association wouldn`t let me do anything that was dangerous. Would they? I must say that if I flew over some of the country that you people do, and provide such great pics. of I don`t think I would take off without two engines (or more) at least Cheers Pat


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:17:32 PM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    She, too, was hassled by the Air Force when they tried to take her land, but in the end she won a substantial lawsuit against the Air Force.>> I have heard of Pancho Barnes and her part i the Space programme. Good for her.. I am not suggesting for a moment that the government won`t shaft us but I don`t think they actually set out with that in mind.It sort of happens. Re land tussles. We had a classic case here soon after the war. During the war the Army took over a large estate called Crichel Down with the promise that it would be returned after the war when the army had no use for it. The Army eventually finished with it but the Ministry promptly offered it to another branch of the Services. The owner, who happened to have a lot of money,said, `That wasn`t the agreement` and took the government to court, and won. It took a long time and a lot of money but as a result several highly placed Civil Servants were bowler hatted. Cheers Pat


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:38:42 PM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: LSA (Was Airport Attitudes)
    Do even foot launched aircraft require a C of A?>> Hi Dana, perhaps I expressed myself badly. I do not think that PPG, hang gliders etc require a C of A.and you are probably right that the picture changes when you add wheels. Wheels are becoming common here too. Saw a picture this week of a hang glider, with the pilot hanging prone as they do these days but with a pedal operated propellor on the back. I wonder what category that will come in. Pat


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:39:09 PM PST US
    From: <smlplanet@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    Don't use the standard PVC with gas, it will have a reaction in time and cause more problems. I had to install a temporary PVC line in until we could plumb in the steel over head piping and had problems and at $30,000 per hr down time I learned quick. -------------------------------------------------- From: "grantr" <grant_richardson25@yahoo.com> Sent: 2008-10-15 10:51 Subject: Kolb-List: Re: CT MKIII crash > > It sounds like about anything will do the job so I think I am going with > something like this: > > http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/pg13.html > > Simple cheap and effective! I could probably make a better one out of some > pvc or galvanized pipe from lowes. using a t fitting to rune 2 fuel barbs > and a pipe on the bottom of the T as the sump for the water. > > Anyone know how gasoline affects pvc? > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8885#208885 > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:36 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Quiet Kolb
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    That looks like a really nice, clean HKS installation ! Your report seems typical for HKS engines, they are expensive but everyone I have ever read about just loves the HKS. They use them in trikes with very good results also. Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8948#208948


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:47:34 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    The vibration was minimal, great video ! That was wild seeing you take off out a that trench, I have never seen anything so narrow. I sure would like to see a video of what the landings are like :) Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8951#208951


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:52:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Gerry Olenik of Green Sky Aviation
    From: "robcannon" <leecannon@telus.net>
    I bought my hks from Gerry @ http://www.greenskyadventures.com/ almost a year ago, and have been very impressed with his service and knowledge. He has been prompt with parts shipment, and very generous with his tech support. I personally recommend anyone who wants to buy a hks engine do so from Gerry. He has years of experience installing different engines on different airframes, and I have found his word to be honest and reliable. The hks is a relatively high performance engine and as such will likely require some custom tuning to your application. The learning curve was steep for me and I was thankful to have Gerry there to help. Dana from flightstar was also a huge help with tech support getting my install running smoothly. Rob Cannon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8953#208953


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:38 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    How long before there is a reaction to the PVC? We have been running this setup for a year and everything is still doing fine. http://www.bcchapel.org/pages/0003/FSIITankMods.html Richard Pike MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8957#208957


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:02:53 PM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: LSA (Was Airport Attitudes)
    At 04:38 PM 10/15/2008, pj.ladd wrote: >Saw a picture this week of a hang glider, with the pilot hanging prone as >they do these days but with a pedal operated propellor on the back. I >wonder what category that will come in. I'd venture the "unsuccessful" category... -Dana -- Canadian DOS prompt: EH?\>


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:02:53 PM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    At 04:16 PM 10/15/2008, pj.ladd wrote: >...I am not suggesting for a moment that the government won`t shaft us but >I don`t think they actually set out with that in mind.It sort of happens... I forget who it was that said, "Never ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence." But any organization, and especially governments, are always controlled by Pournelle's Law: "In any bureaucracy, the people devoted to the benefit of the bureaucracy itself always get in control and those dedicated to the goals the bureaucracy is supposed to accomplish have less and less influence, and sometimes are eliminated entirely." Also stated as: "In any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions." -Dana do not archive -- Canadian DOS prompt: EH?\>


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:25:42 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Gerry Olenik of Green Sky Aviation
    From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
    robcannon wrote: > I bought my hks from Gerry @ http://www.greenskyadventures.com/ > almost a year ago, and have been very impressed with his service and knowledge. He has been prompt with parts shipment, and very generous with his tech support. I personally recommend anyone who wants to buy a hks engine do so from Gerry. He has years of experience installing different engines on different airframes, and I have found his word to be honest and reliable. The hks is a relatively high performance engine and as such will likely require some custom tuning to your application. The learning curve was steep for me and I was thankful to have Gerry there to help. > Dana from flightstar was also a huge help with tech support getting my install running smoothly. > Rob Cannon Just as a general FYI, I few years ago I had Gerry's son Tom (Olenik) do the 100 hour's on a couple of my 503's. They came back looking and running better than new; he does superb motor work. So I'm sure that by extension all the Olenik's are great folks to deal with. LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 8975#208975


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:05:02 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    Patrick: Glad I do not have to follow your advice. I mentioned checking carb float bowls recently. We have had several engine outs because float bowls were not checked. Some of these engine outs resulted in fatalities. One time I got lazy and developed a rough running engine because I did not check mine. Now I check them at least once a month, whether I fly or not. Nothing wrong with redundancy. If you do not want it, fine! Probably not a good idea to advise others that it is not necessary. Checking float bowls every year or so will get you in trouble. Go with the flow, man, but not a good idea to recommend others do likewise. john h mkIII Nah!!. Empty you carb. chamber occasionally, evry year or so, and you will be right. You can get too hung up on all the little things that can go wrong until you have redundancy built in all over the place. Cool it and go with the flow, man Cheers Pat


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:49 PM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    I welded up an Aluminum Tank 2"x 6" fuel line in on top, Fuel line out to engine 3" up on side, Drain out of bottom You can mount these with Adel Clamps to your airframe this is what I made for my firestar and never had contaminated fuel , I am willing to make as many as you Kolbers need for cost of materials and a bit for my time You need to let me know how many fuel lines in and How many lines out you would like and I can make these larger if you desire it. Ellery in Maine trying to get time to work on my MK3Xtra do not archive In a message dated 10/15/2008 9:05:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lcottrell@fmtcblue.com writes: Patrick: Glad I do not have to follow your advice. I mentioned checking carb float bowls recently. We have had several engine outs because float bowls were not checked. Some of these engine outs resulted in fatalities. One time I got lazy and developed a rough running engine because I did not check mine. Now I check them at least once a month, whether I fly or not. Nothing wrong with redundancy. If you do not want it, fine! Probably not a good idea to advise others that it is not necessary. Checking float bowls every year or so will get you in trouble. Go with the flow, man, but not a good idea to recommend others do likewise. john h mkIII Nah!!. Empty you carb. chamber occasionally, evry year or so, and you will be right. You can get too hung up on all the little things that can go wrong until you have redundancy built in all over the place. Cool it and go with the flow, man Cheers Pat (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002)




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --