Kolb-List Digest Archive

Thu 10/16/08


Total Messages Posted: 23



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:05 AM - Re: Re: CT MKIII crash (pj.ladd)
     2. 03:46 AM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (pj.ladd)
     3. 04:07 AM - Water in gas (Ted Cowan)
     4. 04:11 AM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (Dana Hague)
     5. 05:46 AM - Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video (David Lucas)
     6. 07:08 AM - Re: Water in gas (Richard Girard)
     7. 07:15 AM - Re: Re: Airport Attitudes (russ kinne)
     8. 12:13 PM - Gas and PVC  (Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL)
     9. 12:25 PM - Redundant Fuel Pumps  (Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL)
    10. 02:28 PM - Re: Redundant Fuel Pumps  (Larry Cottrell)
    11. 02:43 PM - Re: Water in gas (Dana Hague)
    12. 04:07 PM - MarkIIIC strut connection (clrprop)
    13. 05:10 PM - Re: Water in gas (Richard Girard)
    14. 05:18 PM - Re: Water in gas (russ kinne)
    15. 05:33 PM - Re: Water in gas (Dana Hague)
    16. 05:38 PM - Re: Gas and PVC  (Dana Hague)
    17. 06:02 PM - Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (robert bean)
    18. 06:26 PM - Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (clrprop)
    19. 06:33 PM - Re: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (Richard Girard)
    20. 06:35 PM - Re: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (robert bean)
    21. 06:46 PM - Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (robcannon)
    22. 06:48 PM - Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (clrprop)
    23. 11:51 PM - Re: MarkIIIC strut connection (Tony Oldman)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:05:13 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: CT MKIII crash
    Glad I do not have to follow your advice.>> Hi John, if I did your sort of flying I woukld have EVERYTHING duplicated, every nut locked, and wired and use only fuel straight from ther best garage in the district and then I would filter it 3 times. Cheers Pat


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:46:26 AM PST US
    From: "pj.ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    "Never ascribe to malice what can be explained by incompetence." >> Hi Dana, I have never heard that but I suppose it about sums up my general attitude. Pournelles Law. Something else of which I have never heard. Would that be Jerry Pournelle SF writer by any chance. I wouldn`t disagree with the `bureaucracy wins` theory.. I just hope, probably against the evidence that my optimism will win through. Cheers Pat


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:07:40 AM PST US
    From: "Ted Cowan" <tc1917@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Water in gas
    Back on line now, been in hospital for a week with pneumonia, etc. There is something very simple you can do about this ethanol stuff. Go to Wally World and get some Sta-Bil ethanol Treatment. Made the trip to Kentucky with it in my RV tanks, put it in my lawn mowers, little honda scooter, BMW road bike, and -- used it in my gas of the 912 slingshot. Been using Sta-bil for years and years and it is great on everything. Now, this new stuff is meant for the ehanol deal. Go on the websites about this stuff and read it. Use it or weep later. There are also brands for Marine use which has more water hazard than we do. This is one additive that will mix with oil or not, dont matter. Check it out. You wont be sorry. I think it makes the 912 start better and if you were at the factory, you KNOW it performs. Hope this helps. Check it out!!!! Ted Cowan, Alabama Slingshot 912.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:11:01 AM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    At 06:45 AM 10/16/2008, pj.ladd wrote: > >Pournelles Law. Something else of which I have never heard. Would that be >Jerry Pournelle SF writer by any chance. Yes, the same... one of my favorite writers. He's one of the first bloggers, though he disdains that word, writing daily on subjects from science to computers to politics and everything in between, nearly always interesting: http://www.jerrypournelle.com/view/currentview.html -Dana definitely do not archive this off topic stuff! -- When Marriage is Outlawed, Only Outlaws will have Inlaws.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:46:10 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Redrive VW powered MKIIIC Video
    From: "David Lucas" <d_a_lucas@hotmail.com>
    Thought the video was pretty good myself. A few shakes while taxying but pretty smooth airborne. But FYI. there are few software programs that are suposed to help things in this area, like http://www.sundancemediagroup.com/articles/deshaker_guide.htm Never tried it, but it sounds OK. David. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9005#209005


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:08:01 AM PST US
    From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Water in gas
    Ted, Glad to hear you're back in service, pneumonia is no fun. Good tip on the Sta-bil, thanks. We're lucky, perhaps because of the aircraft industry here in Wichita, we've not been subject to the ethanol swindle yet. Water in fuel, or the fear of it, can still be handled by a 99 cent bottle of gas line drier. Rick On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Ted Cowan <tc1917@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Back on line now, been in hospital for a week with pneumonia, etc. There > is something very simple you can do about this ethanol stuff. Go to Wally > World and get some Sta-Bil ethanol Treatment. Made the trip to Kentucky > with it in my RV tanks, put it in my lawn mowers, little honda scooter, BMW > road bike, and -- used it in my gas of the 912 slingshot. Been using > Sta-bil for years and years and it is great on everything. Now, this new > stuff is meant for the ehanol deal. Go on the websites about this stuff and > read it. Use it or weep later. There are also brands for Marine use which > has more water hazard than we do. This is one additive that will mix with > oil or not, dont matter. Check it out. You wont be sorry. I think it > makes the 912 start better and if you were at the factory, you KNOW it > performs. Hope this helps. Check it out!!!! Ted Cowan, Alabama Slingshot > 912. > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:12 AM PST US
    From: russ kinne <russ@rkiphoto.com>
    Subject: Re: Airport Attitudes
    Pat I googled Pournelle -- here 'tis Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy states that in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:13:17 PM PST US
    Subject: Gas and PVC
    From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil>
    (NOTE - Subject Line changed to reflect current topic.) "grantr" wrote: << Simple cheap and effective! I could probably make a better one (gascolator) out of some pvc or galvanized pipe from lowes. using a t fitting to rune 2 fuel barbs and a pipe on the bottom of the T as the sump for the water. Anyone know how gasoline affects pvc? >> Grant - Following the advice of someone else on this List, I made a homemade gascolator using PVC. As you correctly observe - simple, cheap, effective! (I'd like to give credit to whoever it was that I copied it from, but I forgot who it was! Was it you, Richard P?) I used a 2-inch long piece of 1-1/4" diameter schedule-80 PVC, with end caps glued on. Drilled two 3/8" holes opposite each other near the top (thru the end cap), and screwed a brass fuel barb into each hole. On the bottom PVC cap, I drilled another hole in the center, and threaded into it a Curtis drain valve. I installed the gascolator so that the drain valve pokes out thru the fabric, on the belly of my Kolb. (Which also happens to be the lowest part of my fuel system.) Easy to take a fuel sample from on preflight. I used fuel-proof thread sealer goop (a Permatex product) on the 3 holes where brass hardware is threaded in. It's been installed for over 3 years now, and I've never had a leak. More details are in the archives - this thread has been discussed before. To answer the question of gasoline vs. PVC - before making this homemade gascolator, I set out to prove to myself that PVC would not be affected by gasoline. I filled a glass jar with gas, and dropped in a short piece of PVC pipe. I let it sit for several months. No discernable degradation to the PVC. Dennis Kirby Mark-3, 912ul Cedar Crest, NM


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:25:59 PM PST US
    Subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps
    From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil>
    "pj.ladd" chides: << You can get too hung up on all the little things that can go wrong until you have redundancy built in all over the place. Where are you going to stop? All this fuss a few weeks ago about fitting an extra fuel pump. What for? Pat >> Pat - I am one of those whom you speak of who gets all hung up! In 1992, I was forced to make an emergency off-airport landing in my Tri-Pacer because of vapor lock in the fuel line. I was trying to climb over a mountain range in the middle of a hot summer in Arizona, and things got so hot in the engine area that bubbles began to form in the fuel line, causing the engine RPM to begin surging up and down (mostly down). The Tri-Pacer has no fuel pump - it relies on gravity feed from the wing tanks. I firmly believe that, had a fuel pump of any kind been installed, that Lycoming engine would have kept running. So now, I'm making up for it by having TWO fuel pumps in my Mark-3 - the mechanical pump on the 912, and a Facet electrical pump. Just because I can! (Since I built it.) Call me chicken. Dennis Kirby New Mexico Do not archive


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:28:55 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: Redundant Fuel Pumps
    Dennis: Nothing chicken about being prepared. I have a redundant fuel pump system in my MKIII. Never had to use it, but it is there should I need it. I also did not have to ask permission to design and install the system in the airplane I built. john h The flying chicken hauck (hawk) mkIII Call me chicken. Dennis Kirby


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:24 PM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Water in gas
    At 10:07 AM 10/16/2008, Richard Girard wrote: >...we've not been subject to the ethanol swindle yet. Water in fuel, or >the fear of it, can still be handled by a 99 cent bottle of gas line drier... Which is... ALCOHOL! You sure you wanna do that? -Dana -- I started out with nothing. I still have most of it left.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:07:18 PM PST US
    Subject: MarkIIIC strut connection
    From: "clrprop" <ktony@windstream.net>
    The connection at the bottom of the strut has lots of slop in it. The bracket on the fuse has a 9/16" gap and the connector on the bottom of the strut is only 1/4" wide. Do I need bushings to take up the slack or is it supposed to be this way? Thanks for any help. The maiden flight is almost in sight.... Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9086#209086


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:10:50 PM PST US
    From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Water in gas
    No ****. Rotax and HKS both allow 5% ethanol blended gas. 8 ounces in 1280 to 1536 ounces (depending on whether I'm flying the MkIII or the trike) is .625% and .521% respectively. I don't think it's going to hurt anything and I've watched it blend in a water drop caught in the fuel filter almost as soon as it hits the tank, so yeah, I want to do that. Rick On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net> wrote: > > At 10:07 AM 10/16/2008, Richard Girard wrote: > >> ...we've not been subject to the ethanol swindle yet. Water in fuel, or >> the fear of it, can still be handled by a 99 cent bottle of gas line >> drier... >> > > Which is... ALCOHOL! You sure you wanna do that? > > -Dana > > -- > I started out with nothing. I still have most of it left. > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:18:30 PM PST US
    From: russ kinne <russ@rkiphoto.com>
    Subject: Re: Water in gas
    As I understand it, Sta-Bil will do this too, and has other good qualities. Anyone know for sure? On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Richard Girard wrote: > No ****. Rotax and HKS both allow 5% ethanol blended gas. 8 ounces > in 1280 to 1536 ounces (depending on whether I'm flying the MkIII > or the trike) is .625% and .521% respectively. I don't think it's > going to hurt anything and I've watched it blend in a water drop > caught in the fuel filter almost as soon as it hits the tank, so > yeah, I want to do that. > > Rick > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net> > wrote: > > At 10:07 AM 10/16/2008, Richard Girard wrote: > ...we've not been subject to the ethanol swindle yet. Water in > fuel, or the fear of it, can still be handled by a 99 cent bottle > of gas line drier... > > Which is... ALCOHOL! You sure you wanna do that? > > -Dana > > -- > I started out with nothing. I still have most of it left. > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:33:27 PM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Water in gas
    At 08:10 PM 10/16/2008, Richard Girard wrote: >No ****. Rotax and HKS both allow 5% ethanol blended gas. 8 ounces in 1280 >to 1536 ounces (depending on whether I'm flying the MkIII or the trike) is >.625% and .521% respectively. I don't think it's going to hurt anything >and I've watched it blend in a water drop caught in the fuel filter almost >as soon as it hits the tank, so yeah, I want to do that. I'm not terribly worried about ethanol, since all I can get here is 10% ethanol gasoline, and I've had no problems other than the need for jetting adjustments, but since the first part of the message referred to concern about ethanol, I was pointing out that drygas IS alcohol (isopropyl, or sometimes methyl). -Dana -- Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors-- and miss.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:38:20 PM PST US
    From: Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Gas and PVC
    At 03:10 PM 10/16/2008, Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL wrote: >Following the advice of someone else on this List, I made a homemade >gascolator using PVC.... >...I filled a glass jar with gas, and dropped in a short >piece of PVC pipe. I let it sit for several months. No discernable >degradation to the PVC. That's encouraging. All the chemical compatibility information I've found shows PVC compatibility with unleaded gasoline and ethanol as only "fair"... "good" for leaded, and "excellent" for "high aromatic gasoline" (whatever that is). CPVC (the typical tan plumbing pipe) is listed as worse, only "fair" for all types of gasoline. Makes me leery. -Dana -- Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors-- and miss.


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:02:45 PM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    If the connection rattle bothers you or you figure the wear might be excessive, you can squeeze a little RTV in the area. -that is if you don't do a regular wing fold. My grass is so long and soft I don't notice. -ask Thom Riddle. BB On 16, Oct 2008, at 7:06 PM, clrprop wrote: > > The connection at the bottom of the strut has lots of slop in it. > The bracket on the fuse has a 9/16" gap and the connector on the > bottom of the strut is only 1/4" wide. > Do I need bushings to take up the slack or is it supposed to be > this way? > > Thanks for any help. > > The maiden flight is almost in sight.... > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9086#209086 > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:26:06 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    From: "clrprop" <ktony@windstream.net>
    I haven't flown it yet so I don't know if it will rattle. I'll be transporting it to the airfield at least till spring so lots of folding and unfolding. I don't understand the design if thats the way it's supposed to be. There's an extra 5/16" of play in there right now. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9115#209115


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:33:12 PM PST US
    From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    Make for easy alignment of the fittings when setting up. I think John H said he welded bushings to his struts and then bolted them together. But to answer your original question, yep, that's the way they're made. Rick On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:25 PM, clrprop <ktony@windstream.net> wrote: > > I haven't flown it yet so I don't know if it will rattle. > I'll be transporting it to the airfield at least till spring so lots of > folding and unfolding. > I don't understand the design if thats the way it's supposed to be. There's > an extra 5/16" of play in there right now. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9115#209115 > >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:45 PM PST US
    From: robert bean <slyck@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    There is an equal amount of play at the main spar connection although the aft connection prevents any shift other than normal expansion. The lower (strut) play is exclusively lateral so doesn't change geometry. It usually finds a happy spot to rest and you won't notice. BB On 16, Oct 2008, at 9:25 PM, clrprop wrote: > > I haven't flown it yet so I don't know if it will rattle. > I'll be transporting it to the airfield at least till spring so > lots of folding and unfolding. > I don't understand the design if thats the way it's supposed to be. > There's an extra 5/16" of play in there right now. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9115#209115 > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:46:25 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    From: "robcannon" <leecannon@telus.net>
    I put two fat nylon washers on each side of the strut to hold it centered. Rob Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9119#209119


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:48:08 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    From: "clrprop" <ktony@windstream.net>
    Thanks for your help guys. What a great forum! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9120#209120


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:51:11 PM PST US
    From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman@xtra.co.nz>
    Subject: Re: MarkIIIC strut connection
    I made plastic washers to take up the gaps.These have been in place for about 200hrs without any problems.The washers stopped a lot of rattles at idle .Easy to do and cheap. Regards Downunder MK111 c ----- Original Message ----- From: "clrprop" <ktony@windstream.net> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 12:06 PM Subject: Kolb-List: MarkIIIC strut connection > > The connection at the bottom of the strut has lots of slop in it. The > bracket on the fuse has a 9/16" gap and the connector on the bottom of the > strut is only 1/4" wide. > Do I need bushings to take up the slack or is it supposed to be this way? > > Thanks for any help. > > The maiden flight is almost in sight.... > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 9086#209086 > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --