Kolb-List Digest Archive

Wed 11/12/08


Total Messages Posted: 25



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     0. 12:20 AM - Please Make A Contribution To Support Your Lists (Matt Dralle)
     1. 02:43 AM - Re: Engine Weight limit (Richard Girard)
     2. 03:59 AM - Re: Re: MK III Climb performance with Rotax 503 update 11-10-08 (Tony Oldman)
     3. 05:41 AM - Re: MK III Climb performance with Rotax 503 update 11-10-08 (David Lucas)
     4. 06:29 AM - Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64 (gary aman)
     5. 06:42 AM - Re: Mark 3C/912 on floats & CHT sending unit (russ kinne)
     6. 06:47 AM - Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64 (Thom Riddle)
     7. 07:04 AM - Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64 (John Hauck)
     8. 07:13 AM - Re: Engine Weight limit (John Hauck)
     9. 07:18 AM - digital video kolb list (boyd)
    10. 07:21 AM - Re: Re: Econo Miser!!  (Jack B. Hart)
    11. 07:49 AM - Re: Re: Econo Miser!!  (John Hauck)
    12. 09:22 AM - Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64  (Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL)
    13. 09:48 AM - Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64 (Richard Girard)
    14. 12:41 PM - starter housing (Larry Cottrell)
    15. 01:08 PM - Re: starter housing (herb)
    16. 01:53 PM - Re: starter housing (Larry Cottrell)
    17. 02:03 PM - Re: starter housing (herb)
    18. 02:06 PM - Re: help picking video camera (possums)
    19. 04:02 PM - Re: Engine Weight limit (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
    20. 04:25 PM - Re: starter housing (ElleryWeld@aol.com)
    21. 05:50 PM - Re: Engine Weight limit (herb)
    22. 06:18 PM - Re: UL: Re: Oil for 2 stroke air cooled (HShack@aol.com)
    23. 07:11 PM - Re: Annual inspection (Nelson, Craig)
    24. 07:42 PM - Re: Annual inspection (John Hauck)
 
 
 


Message 0


  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:20:54 AM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Please Make A Contribution To Support Your Lists
    Dear Listers, There is no advertising income to support the Matronics Email Lists and Forums. The operation is supported 100% by your personal Contributions during the November Fund Raiser. Please make your Contribution today to support the continued operation and upgrade of these services. You can pick up a really nice gift for making your Contribution too! You may use a Credit Card or Paypal at the Matronics Contribution Site here: http://www.matronics.com/contribution or, you can send a personal check to the following address: Matronics / Matt Dralle PO Box 347 Livermore, CA 94551-0347 Thank you in advance for your generous support! Matt Dralle Matronics Email List and Forum Administrator


    Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:17 AM PST US
    From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine Weight limit
    You're right John, I often confuse the Wright Flyer with a Rans S-12 given the great physical similarity.The question was, what is the upper weight limit for an engine on a Kolb airframe, not anything about the history of the Kolb. Eugene, facetiously, suggested it was the difference between empty and gross weights. My comment was meant to suggest the limit might be slightly lower than that. Time for a pill, John. Rick On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:44 PM, John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> wrote: > Rick: > > You must be thinking of Rans S-12's. > > Kolbs do not have a history of dumping engines on their crews. > > john h > mkIII > Nellis AFB, NV > > > The other side of the limit is what will the cage hold in a crash. The > reason the army stopped buying Wright aircraft was that too many trainees > were killed in relatively light crashes when the engine tore loose from its > mounts and crushed them. > > Rick > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:59:00 AM PST US
    From: "Tony Oldman" <aoldman@xtra.co.nz>
    Subject: Re: MK III Climb performance with Rotax 503 update 11-10-08
    I climb at 55mph, 1 up and 60 two up with a MK111 503. simulated engine outs would indicate these speeds to be OK. That is flying off a field at 80ft msl. Not in a Kolb but I lost a gear box drive with a Truster powered by a 503 at 350 ft at about 55 mph and the recovery and landing were all sort of uneventfull { just a high heart rate }The truster was a very high drag aircraft. Engine out landings were almost a auto rotate decent and if you added some side slip you could almost come straight down. Regards Tony Down under MK111 c 503 ----- Original Message ----- From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:38 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: MK III Climb performance with Rotax 503 update 11-10-08 > > I think those rates are great for a 503 on a MK III, it is more than I > would have expected. Rough air can hurt climb rates, I would take the > readings in perfectly smooth air. Also wind gradients can affect climb > rate, If you run into more head wind you can have spikes... > > I think you might do a little better at 55 mph, I keep mine at 60 just for > safety.. I have simulated engine failures at 60 MPH in my kolb, the > climb is so steep that it takes darn near a 0 G pushover to keep from > stalling, and that is when I am expecting it ! I think a surprise failure > at anything less than 60 MPH in climb would be extremely difficult. > > Mike > > -------- > &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you > could have !!! > > Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=213610#213610 > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:41:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: MK III Climb performance with Rotax 503 update 11-10-08
    From: "David Lucas" <d_a_lucas@hotmail.com>
    > There's the key. Can't stall at zero G. I don't care what your > attitude is. > > Sure would help though to have enough wind passing the controls to do > something helpful. Can remember watching a video of unusual attitude recovery training and using the DC-10 recovering from a very high nose attitude / low airspeed upset scenario as an example, they had sufficient roll, pitch and yaw authority to recover to straight and level flight starting at 80 Kts ! Yes 80 Kts . . . and that was because despite the high nose attitude, with less than 1 G pitch loading, they were NOT stalled and therefore had aerodynamic control available. They lowered the nose with rudder input, not elevator, keeping at or about zero G pitch loading. That produced about a 75 degrees left wing low roll attitude, like a wing over maneuver, then as the nose fell below the horizon started rolling it level with aileron to a nose low, wings level attitude, then as it started to accelerate gradually introduced elevator pressure to recover to straight and level. So the DC-10 was under full, if somewhat sluggish, aerodynamic control starting at 80 Kts. Very impressive ! David. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=213721#213721


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:29:03 AM PST US
    From: gary aman <gaman@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64
    JBM makes better quality boots for less money,for ALL Rotax and HKS engines. ________________________________ From: Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 10:32:06 AM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64 John, I went up to Council Groves and met the guys at the Bing Agency. If it's for a Bing, they have it in quantity. Before you start tearing carbs apart, check the carb boots. I had the same problems with my HKS that you're experiencing and found the carb boots were rotten. Multiple cracks and fissures on the inside, outside they looked brand new. Rick On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:16 AM, John Bickham <gearbender@bellsouth.net> wrote: Hello list, Well I think it is time for me to overhaul the Bing 64 carbs on my 912UL. The engine is running fine. We have had a stretch of great weather and it is hard to pull the carbs off and quite flying. I think I am the victim of CRS disease. One problem I'm having on start up is rough running until enricher (choke) is closed. I don't remember that in the first couple of hundred hours. I think it is one of those things that has crept in slowly and gotten to the point it is noticeable now. Another little thing is just a barely noticeable miss every now and then at 3000 rpm or less. I also have to adjust the mixture screw on one carb more than the recommended 1.5 turns to get a good carb balance. I have attended the ROTAX Maintenance Level I course. Don't have all the tools or confidence to do it right. Has anyone had any experience with Bing Agency in Kansas? http://www.bingcarburetor.com/ -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as slow as you could have !!! Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=213494#213494


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:42:41 AM PST US
    From: russ kinne <russ@rkiphoto.com>
    Subject: Re: Mark 3C/912 on floats & CHT sending unit
    SAFE TO READ -- REQUIRES NO AN SWER > Glad you're having a fun trip. > "Lap top has been down 6 weeks." --? sounds like heaven Have a ball Russ


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:47:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64
    From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
    John, I've done the take-apart, clean, inspect and replace worn parts on Bing 64s several times, including on type certificated Rotax engines. STEP 1, (do not omit): Buy Bing's Carb Manual for $10 including shipping. It tells you all you need to know about how the Bing carbs work and how to inspect etc. STEP 2: It is not hard to do if you are careful and DO ONE CARB AT A TIME or otherwise make sure you keep all the parts of one carb separate from the other. Some of the parts between the left and right carb are not interchangeable. STEP 3: After you've taken them apart, cleaned and inspected, you can tell which parts actually need replacement, and buy only those parts. It will probably save you a LOT of money. I've never needed to buy more than about $30-40 worth of parts for any Bing 64 carb, even on those that have had 2,000 hours in service without overhaul. BING usually has the highest prices on parts. Shop around and you'll save a good bit. -------- Thom Riddle CFI-SP Power Plant Mechanic N1208P RANS S6S, Tailwheel, 912UL N197BG FS1/447 -------------------- Scratch any cynic, he said, and youll find a disappointed idealist. George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=213733#213733


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:49 AM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64
    Rick: How long were the carb boots in service on the HKS when you discovered they were unserviceable? john h mkIII I had the same problems with my HKS that you're experiencing and found the carb boots were rotten. Multiple cracks and fissures on the inside, outside they looked brand new. Rick


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:13:43 AM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine Weight limit
    Rick: You are absolutely correct. Thought the bit of info on RANS S-12's would be of interest to the List. As far as Kolb history, I don't remember a Kolb accident where the engine seperated from the airframe or the airframe collapsed, allowing the engine to come down on the crew. I doubt there is any published info on max engine weight on Kolbs. Did I miss a pill? Thought I took them before I went to bed last night. john h mkIII The question was, what is the upper weight limit for an engine on a Kolb airframe, not anything about the history of the Kolb. . Time for a pill, John. Rick


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:23 AM PST US
    From: "boyd" <by0ung@brigham.net>
    Subject: digital video kolb list
    My neighbor's son developed a camera the size of a credit card about 3/32 inch thick, and I wanted something that would fit in my pocket. so when I asked where I could purchase one, he told me "forget about my camera get a "casio exlim EX - Z80"" it will take still photos, video's, and has a mode for u tube built in,,, plus many other features.. my friend and I did some air to ground photography of a tour de cure bike ride and we did some video of on coming bikes,, our speed was about 80 and the bikes were doing lets say around 15,,, so with a 95 mph closing rate we were very pleased with the results. It has capabilities of 8.1 mega pixels with 3 x optical zoom with another 2 x digital zoom.. and it fits in your pocket. While reviewing pictures taken in video mode you can isolate any frame and convert it to a still picture. And it does sound as well. It is not the quality of many SLR'S but we wanted a smaller size to take hiking etc. we used at least 3 different cameras on that day,,, you could go to the American diabetes association web sight and there should be a link to the photos. Last month there was a fire in the neighborhood and I took a small video and uploaded it to the local tv station and it was good enough quality they used it on the news. Boyd Young Kolb MkIII C 555+ hours and counting Brigham City Utah. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. I plan on buying a digital video camera with Christmas money. I don't want the most expensive camera but I don't want cheap low quality either. I want to be able to download the videos to youtube and other websites. Do any of you have any reccomendations? Grant


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:21:06 AM PST US
    From: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Econo Miser!!
    At 09:13 PM 11/11/08 -0800, you wrote: > >You forgot to brief us on performance before and after. > John, I thought I did. The average fuel flow rate after mounting the system was 2.03 gph. The average fuel flow rate before mounting the system over the same total time period was 2.38 gph. Since I could not subtract correctly, I will give the corrected difference in that the system has reduced the average flow rate by 0.35 gph for a 15% reduction in flow rate with the system. This indicates that for every three hours flown, I get a half hour flight for free. If you are talking about flight performance, at this time there is no change. With the leaning, the engine picks up some rpm and so I could crank a little more pitch into the IVO. At this point, I would rather leave the pitch alone and take some more fuel flow data at lower and higher EGT's to see what effect it would have on the fuel flow rate. I was lucky to get as much data as I did for the time of the year. So I may not be able to complete the data taking until next year. One of the things I discovered from trying to develop a good static pressure source, is that on a pusher with the carburetor very close in front of the propeller, in my case about one foot, engine performance is degraded. This is due to the fact that the propeller is accelerating (sucking) the air and in doing so causes a local pressure drop. I discovered this when I tried to place a static pressure tap on the bottom of the carburetor. Also, I discovered that with the pressure was very unstable. A change in direction could cause a change in pressure. I believe this was caused by the engine profile blanking the propeller entrance air flow relative as one crabbed into the wind. By moving the reference point below the wing all of this variation went away. There are several things, I don't understand. One is that with the EGT elevated and at cruise rpm, I can push the stick forward, and raise the rpm 200 rpm without the EGT increasing. Or I can power down at 500 fpm and reduce the throttle a little to maintain constant rpm and the EGT does on increase. This makes it very nice for approaching an airport, as I do not have to slow up to loose altitude. There is some kind of interaction within the system that makes it some what self compensating. Cold out side and no flying so I am rambling. Fly Safe! Jack B. Hart FF004 Winchester,


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:24 AM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Econo Miser!!
    > > There are several things, I don't understand. One is that with the EGT > elevated and at cruise rpm, I can push the stick forward, and raise the > rpm > 200 rpm without the EGT increasing. Or I can power down at 500 fpm and > reduce the throttle a little to maintain constant rpm and the EGT does on > increase. This makes it very nice for approaching an airport, as I do not > have to slow up to loose altitude. There is some kind of interaction > within > the system that makes it some what self compensating. > > Cold out side and no flying so I am rambling. > > Fly Safe! > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, Jack H: Very interesting. Certainly not a normal reaction for a two stroke aircraft engine. When I started flying my newly built Kolb Ultrastar in 1984, I had no experience flying with a two stroke. I flew almost every day back then. Most flights were filled with experiments. On one particular flight I noticed the two stroke seemed to make large rpm changes when loaded and unloaded, maintaining constant throttle at cruise rpm. Push the nose over and the rpm would rapidly increase. Pull the stick back and rpm would be rapidly reduced. I also noticed EGT changes during these maneuvers. Unload the engine, egt climbed. Load the engine, egt dropped. Wow! I had never read this info in any of the magazines and books that were available about Ultralights. About this time I discovered our airplanes should be propped using same technique as propping a boat. WOT, straight and level flight, bump the red line. Of course, this worked with non-inflight adjustable props. I also learned, in most cases, Rotax and Cuyuna engines were tuned correctly when they left the factory. Propping the engine/aircraft combo correctly would put all engine temps, EGT/CHT, in the green. It was not necessary to change jets and spark plug heat ranges when based up to 1500 feet ASL with operating temps 40 to well over 100F. That was 24 years ago. I think that system still holds true today. I still prop my engines, 912 series now, WOT, straight and level flight, just bump the red line, the same way. john h mkIII Las Vegas, NV


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:22:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64
    From: "Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL" <Dennis.Kirby@kirtland.af.mil>
    "John Bickham" wrote: << Well I think it is time for me to overhaul the Bing 64 carbs on my 912UL. ... Has anyone had any experience with Bing Agency in Kansas? Thanks too much, John Bickham >> John - I had one of my Bing-64s overhauled by Lockwood last summer, following ingestion of salt water from my "unfortunate" landing on the salt flats a year & a half ago. The cost was about $145, and they did an excellent job - my 912ul runs perfectly again. That price included a new float bowl. Here's my experience with the Bing factory in Kansas - I called 'em and asked if THEY could rebuild my carb (before I went to Lockwood). Once they found out that my Bing-64 was off a Rotax aircraft engine, and not from a snowmobile or jet ski, they flat out refused to even look at it. That was OK by me, because I'd rather have mechanics with experience on real aircraft engines fix my engine parts. Dennis Kirby Mark-3, 912ul Cedar Crest, NM


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:48:39 AM PST US
    From: "Richard Girard" <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on 912 carb overhaul - Bing 64
    John, Just a bit over a year. The story I got was that they had a bad batch in 2005 (there's a service bulletin from HKS on this) and it took awhile to work them all through the system. Despite the fact that they were bad from the factory I had to pay for them. They did let me have them for cost, though. Rick On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:04 AM, John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> wrote: > Rick: > > How long were the carb boots in service on the HKS when you discovered they > were unserviceable? > > john h > mkIII > > I had the same problems with my HKS that you're experiencing and found > the carb boots were rotten. Multiple cracks and fissures on the inside, > outside they looked brand new. > > Rick > > > * > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:41:47 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: starter housing
    Hi, Just took my engine off just now and found something that puzzled me. I do not believe that it is a problem, but I would like other opinions. The outside ring of the starter housing is cracked. All the main fastening areas are secure, I do not know when it occurred or why, possibly torqued incorrectly. I have the engine sold, but do not want to pass anything off to someone that will be a problem. I have 180 hours on the engine, have always used Penn air cooled with Marvel mystery oil and Sta bil. The pistons and rings are great, no carbon, clean as a whistle. Larry C, Oregon


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:08:36 PM PST US
    From: herb <herbgh@nctc.com>
    Subject: Re: starter housing
    Larry The pic shows that the mounting ring is now out of alignment after the crack occurred...It may be that the starter or ring was not flat when first mounted.. and torqued down in a bind... any way...just have it tigged.. I have seen it before... Could also be the unsupported weight of the starter along with the weakness of the mounting ring...especially when starting..Herb At 02:40 PM 11/12/2008, you wrote: >Hi, > Just took my engine off just now and found something that > puzzled me. I do not believe that it is a problem, but I would like > other opinions. The outside ring of the starter housing is cracked. > All the main fastening areas are secure, I do not know when it > occurred or why, possibly torqued incorrectly. I have the engine > sold, but do not want to pass anything off to someone that will be > a problem. I have 180 hours on the engine, have always used Penn > air cooled with Marvel mystery oil and Sta bil. The pistons and > rings are great, no carbon, clean as a whistle. >Larry C, Oregon >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:53:52 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Cottrell" <lcottrell@fmtcblue.com>
    Subject: Re: starter housing
    ----- Original Message ----- From: herb To: kolb-list@matronics.com Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:08 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: starter housing Larry The pic shows that the mounting ring is now out of alignment after the crack occurred...It may be that the starter or ring was not flat when first mounted.. and torqued down in a bind... any way...just have it tigged.. I have seen it before... Could also be the unsupported weight of the starter along with the weakness of the mounting ring...especially when starting..Herb I just got off the phone with Ronnie Smith of South Mississippi light aircraft. He tells me that the starter was torqued down too tight. It is supposed to have some slack in it to allow for movement when the starter is engaged. Thanks Herb for the suggestion, I will have to do that. Larry


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:03:30 PM PST US
    From: herb <herbgh@nctc.com>
    Subject: Re: starter housing
    Now I remember....the starter on a 532 engine , sitting in a bedroom, has rubber bushings of sorts between the starter and housing ring...Herb At 03:52 PM 11/12/2008, you wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <mailto:herbgh@nctc.com>herb >To: <mailto:kolb-list@matronics.com>kolb-list@matronics.com >Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:08 PM >Subject: Re: Kolb-List: starter housing > ><<mailto:herbgh@nctc.com>herbgh@nctc.com> > >Larry > > The pic shows that the mounting ring is now out of alignment >after the crack occurred...It may be that the starter or ring was not >flat when first mounted.. and torqued down in a bind... any >way...just have it tigged.. I have seen it before... Could also be >the unsupported weight of the starter along with the weakness of the >mounting ring...especially when starting..Herb > > >I just got off the phone with Ronnie Smith of South Mississippi >light aircraft. He tells me that the starter was torqued down too >tight. It is supposed to have some slack in it to allow for movement >when the starter is engaged. > >Thanks Herb for the suggestion, I will have to do that. >Larry > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:06:36 PM PST US
    From: possums <possums@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: help picking video camera
    At 07:25 PM 11/11/2008, you wrote: > >I plan on buying a digital video camera with Christmas money. I >don't want the most expensive camera but I don't want cheap low quality either. > >I want to be able to download the videos to youtube and other websites. > >Do any of you have any reccomendations? > >Grant This one works pretty good - about 2 years old. I'm sure they have better or newer models now. Can shoot about 30 minutes of HD video on a charge. It records on a chip that you can take out & plug into your computer - You can make mpeg4s for Youtube or burn HD disk for the TV or just watch & edit it on the computer. http://www.broadwayphoto.com/productlistings.aspx?FC=F_SYVPCHD1AG&L=google On the cage/gap seal: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6787107193246239411&hl=en On the wing: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=263159682459782825&hl=en On my helmet: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2887020469201792731&hl=en


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:02:21 PM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Engine Weight limit
    I ask a simple question and got some smart alex answers I don't treat anyone like that on this list I usually give info that I know about or leave the question for someone that has a real answer for it. and the question was" I didn't know if someone has already figured this out or not but anyone know off hand what the heaviest engine a MK3 Xtra Can support and stay within C/G limits?" Ellery in Maine do not archive In a message dated 11/12/2008 5:43:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, aslsa.rng@gmail.com writes: You're right John, I often confuse the Wright Flyer with a Rans S-12 given the great physical similarity. The question was, what is the upper weight limit for an engine on a Kolb airframe, not anything about the history of the Kolb. Eugene, facetiously, suggested it was the difference between empty and gross weights. My comment was meant to suggest the limit might be slightly lower than that. Time for a pill, John. Rick On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:44 PM, John Hauck <_jhauck@elmore.rr.com_ (mailto:jhauck@elmore.rr.com) > wrote: Rick: You must be thinking of Rans S-12's. Kolbs do not have a history of dumping engines on their crews. john h mkIII Nellis AFB, NV The other side of the limit is what will the cage hold in a crash. The reason the army stopped buying Wright aircraft was that too many trainees were killed in relatively light crashes when the engine tore loose from its mounts and crushed them. Rick (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List) **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:25:59 PM PST US
    From: ElleryWeld@aol.com
    Subject: Re: starter housing
    The correct term would be Heliarc it with High Freq tig alone is for Stainless and mild steel welding Ellery in Maine do not archive In a message dated 11/12/2008 4:09:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, herbgh@nctc.com writes: --> Kolb-List message posted by: herb <herbgh@nctc.com> Larry The pic shows that the mounting ring is now out of alignment after the crack occurred...It may be that the starter or ring was not flat when first mounted.. and torqued down in a bind... any way...just have it tigged.. I have seen it before... Could also be the unsupported weight of the starter along with the weakness of the mounting ring...especially when starting..Herb At 02:40 PM 11/12/2008, you wrote: >Hi, > Just took my engine off just now and found something that > puzzled me. I do not believe that it is a problem, but I would like > other opinions. The outside ring of the starter housing is cracked. > All the main fastening areas are secure, I do not know when it > occurred or why, possibly torqued incorrectly. I have the engine > sold, but do not want to pass anything off to someone that will be > a problem. I have 180 hours on the engine, have always used Penn > air cooled with Marvel mystery oil and Sta bil. The pistons and > rings are great, no carbon, clean as a whistle. >Larry C, Oregon > **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:50:37 PM PST US
    From: herb <herbgh@nctc.com>
    Subject: Re: Engine Weight limit
    wondering if it would be more about the structure than the cg? Bet Ricks 2180 VW cg chart would help? You should be able to do some "what if's" from that or a 912S installation cg chart... battery or lead in nose should overcome a heavy engine install.. Herb At 06:01 PM 11/12/2008, you wrote: >I ask a simple question and got some smart alex answers I don't >treat anyone like that on this list I usually give info that I know >about or leave the question for someone that has a real answer for it. >and the question was" >I didn't know if someone has already figured this out or not but > anyone know off hand what the heaviest engine a MK3 Xtra Can > support and stay within C/G limits?" > >Ellery in Maine >do not archive >


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:56 PM PST US
    From: HShack@aol.com
    Subject: Re: UL: Re: Oil for 2 stroke air cooled
    As I stated before, I have been using AV-2 for about 4 years with no problems. The 10 gallons I had are about gone, but that stuff is expensive, especially by the time you figure in freight, etc. Also, I don't know what's in there. I emailed CPS for specs. & got no answer. I recommend anyone looking for 2 stroke air cooled oil, check out the following: _http://seadoosportboats.com/2-CYCLE-ROTAX-OIL-BRAND-LIST-t846.html_ (http://seadoosportboats.com/2-CYCLE-ROTAX-OIL-BRAND-LIST-t846.html) _http://www.johndee.com/discuss/messages/6/75957.html?1221786543_ (http://www.johndee.com/discuss/messages/6/75957.html?1221786543) _http://www.docs.citgo.com/msds_pi/465177.pdf_ (http://www.docs.citgo.com/msds_pi/465177.pdf) No, I don't work for Citgo. Howard Shackleford FS II SC In a message dated 11/12/2008 8:34:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, sabamickey@yahoo.com writes: what about AV-2? **************Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news & p://toolbar.aol.com/moviefone/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000001)


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:43 PM PST US
    Subject: Annual inspection
    From: "Nelson, Craig" <craig.nelson@heraeus.com>
    John good to see you back where u been? U at nellis? Been doing some fun flying. Yaw it fly's believe it or not-- ha-ha-- I have shamed milow into working on his plane. it has been hours away from engine start for 3 years. After he came over the other day and saw my RDAC installation and knew I spent only one day with 3 times the connections I shamed him to work on the fire star. he has actually made the brackets for his RDAC and installed them. he is almost done with the bracket to hold the rectifier. I told him I would help him with the wire crimps and heat shrink tubing.thats about all he is lacking. I feel my plane is built ok, but tim is really fanatical about his. He has helped me and any mistake on mine he learned from it and made his with no errors.. when I help milow.. if I leave a finger print on it he freaks out,,, it is immaculate. He allowed me to help him bleed the brakes and I spilled a few drops of fluid on the floor I have yet to hear the end of it. Not to mention I tipped his cordless drill over and scratched the drill...... Hopefully we will start his engine on thanksgiving. Do not archive Uncle craig john h mkIII Nellis AFB, NV


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:00 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Annual inspection
    > Hopefully we will start his engine on thanksgiving. > Do not archive > Uncle craig Craig: That is good news. Start making plans for MV 2009. Be here before we know it. john h mkIII




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --