Kolb-List Digest Archive

Mon 05/04/09


Total Messages Posted: 19



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:45 AM - Re: Advice on headsets (Ralph B)
     2. 08:16 AM - Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question (dalewhelan)
     3. 08:44 AM - Re: If you care to follow the MV trip (JetPilot)
     4. 09:06 AM - Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question (JetPilot)
     5. 09:09 AM - Re: Advice on headsets (Watkinsdw)
     6. 09:11 AM - Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question (lucien)
     7. 09:14 AM - Re: Monument Valley (dalewhelan)
     8. 09:26 AM - Re: Advice on headsets (lucien)
     9. 12:09 PM - Re: Advice on headsets (b young)
    10. 12:45 PM - Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question (lucien)
    11. 12:56 PM - Re: Advice on headsets (Watkinsdw)
    12. 01:32 PM - Re: Re: Advice on headsets (John Hauck)
    13. 02:38 PM - Re: If you care to follow the MV trip (John Bickham)
    14. 03:16 PM - Re: Advice on headsets (lucien)
    15. 03:24 PM - Re: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip (John Hauck)
    16. 04:28 PM - Re: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip (Richard & Martha Neilsen)
    17. 06:05 PM - Re: Advice on headsets (Watkinsdw)
    18. 06:18 PM - Re: Re: Advice on headsets (John Hauck)
    19. 07:56 PM - Re: Re: Advice on headsets (Gary)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:45:17 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "Ralph B" <ul15rhb@juno.com>
    Many headsets have a mike gain control potentiometer on the mike. To get at it, all you have to do is take off the foam tip and remove a tiny plastic black cover. Underneath that cover is the adjustment for mike gain. Usually turning the gain clockwise means more mike gain. I've played with mine and found that turning the gain down, made for less noise. It's an experimentation process. Ralph -------- Ralph B Original Firestar 447 N91493 E-AB 22 years flying it Kolbra 912UL N20386 1 year flying it Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242606#242606


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:16:55 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question
    From: "dalewhelan" <dalewhelan@earthlink.net>
    I am not familiar with the 912. I use to teach motorcycle electric systems. I get the feeling you were describing a permanent magnet charging system. It really makes little difference anyway. You used good tests but there are ways for the stator to still be bad, although I suspect it is fine. The easiest most conclusive way I know to test it is to use an automotive headlight. Connect High beam to one stator lead and low to another, don't use ground. If th bulb lights bright, you are good. Resist the temptation to rev the motor high and blow the bulb. As for meter tests and other tools. You can perform an insulation test to make sure the stator is not shorted to ground by testing resistance from ant lead to ground. The reading should be infinity. They can still be bad in this may if they arch to ground during operation, a megger could be used to see this. It is likley that it would have failed the voltage output test if this was the case. The voltage test itself can be brought into question due to the fact that it is a no load test. Have you ever had a battery that mould not start a car and then tested its voltage with everything turned off and wondered why a battery with good voltage won't start your car? Let's just imagine a pair of 9 volt batteries in series, we now have 18 volts, will that start your car? Do you think we will read 18 volts when you turn on the cars electrics? A stator can behave it the same way, it may pass an unloaded test when it is bad, it would fail the loaded test. The bulb provides a good load. I hope this helps -------- Dale Whelan 503 powered Firestar II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242648#242648


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:44:39 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    Thats awesome John, maybe someone on the trip will have a laptop so you guys can post photos. Don't forget, you can never take to many pictures ! How long have you been flying your MK III C, did you build it, and how many hours on it now ? Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242652#242652


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:06:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question
    From: "JetPilot" <orcabonita@hotmail.com>
    Lucien, >From what I understand of the system, there is not a problem with running no load on the stator / magnet system . I would replace the bad part and head on out to monument valley ! Mike -------- &quot;NO FEAR&quot; - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!! Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242657#242657


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:09:15 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0@gmail.com>
    Thanks to everyone for the advice. I didn't think about the squelch issue; I usually keep it at a level that I set on the ground, at idle rpms, where speaking just breaks the squelch. I'll try adjusting it under flight conditions. If the engine noise is breaking the squelch, that could solve my problem. It will also confirm I'm an idiot! I'm wondering about whether ANR headsets address certain frequency ranges better than others. It makes sense that the standard general aviation headset may be set up for lycomings and continentals. Does anyone know if the Rotax frequency range is similar, and if not, is there an ANR headset that targets these frequencies? I'm very interested in the DRE's that John H. mentioned, and the Telex headsets that advertise 50db noise reduction sound tempting. Of course the DRE's are a good bit cheaper... Any other ideas? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242658#242658


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:36 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question
    From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
    dalewhelan wrote: > I am not familiar with the 912. I use to teach motorcycle electric systems. > I get the feeling you were describing a permanent magnet charging system. It really makes little difference anyway. > You used good tests but there are ways for the stator to still be bad, although I suspect it is fine. > The easiest most conclusive way I know to test it is to use an automotive headlight. Connect High beam to one stator lead and low to another, don't use ground. If th bulb lights bright, you are good. Resist the temptation to rev the motor high and blow the bulb. > As for meter tests and other tools. You can perform an insulation test to make sure the stator is not shorted to ground by testing resistance from ant lead to ground. The reading should be infinity. They can still be bad in this may if they arch to ground during operation, a megger could be used to see this. It is likley that it would have failed the voltage output test if this was the case. > The voltage test itself can be brought into question due to the fact that it is a no load test. Have you ever had a battery that mould not start a car and then tested its voltage with everything turned off and wondered why a battery with good voltage won't start your car? > Let's just imagine a pair of 9 volt batteries in series, we now have 18 volts, will that start your car? Do you think we will read 18 volts when you turn on the cars electrics? > A stator can behave it the same way, it may pass an unloaded test when it is bad, it would fail the loaded test. The bulb provides a good load. I hope this helps Yeah I'll try the light bulb today just to make sure. The voltage test was just the meter put across the generator leads so indeed there was no load, tho the voltages looked right to me (15 to 25 at frequencies of 150 to 250 on up, up to about 4500 rpm)...... But you're quite right it'd be a good idea to test it with an actual load on it. I checked the resistances of each lead to ground and got infinity as expected. The coil reads close to a dead short, about .1 ohms, which is in the expected range specified in the heavy maintenance manual. So I think I'm ok..... I hope ;) That stator is expensive and replacing it would be pulling the motor off the plane and driving it to Ronnie Smith's place in the pickup..... not something I'd want to do for fun.... Thanks for the info! LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242660#242660


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:59 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Monument Valley
    From: "dalewhelan" <dalewhelan@earthlink.net>
    I have a friend coming with me, he has some type of tricycle gear Firestar. -------- Dale Whelan 503 powered Firestar II Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242661#242661


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:26:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
    Watkinsdw wrote: > > Does anyone know if the Rotax frequency range is similar, and if not, is there an ANR headset that targets these frequencies? > > No and yes! With a 3 blade prop, the 912 makes a significantly higher frequency noise than the typical direct drive 2-blade situations you find in the connie/lyc equipped planes. This is a general problem with using headsets designed for general aviation use in our 912/3-blade prop equipped planes as they're intended to target those lower frequencies. In the typical cessna they work great, but you climb into one our planes with them and you're exhausted and ears ringing at the end of the flight. In researching it, the telex 50-D ANR is the only one I could find that specifically targets higher frequency noise in addition to the lower frequencies. If you look at the graph on telex's website you'll see how the ANR goes will up above the typical 100 hz falloff of the others on the market. That was specifically why I bought it over the others - they are designed for GA use and don't provide good ANR at the noise frequencies we encounter. I can vouch for how well it attenuates a much wider range of noise..... Like I said, expensive but well worth it to protect your hearing. LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242664#242664


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:09:26 PM PST US
    From: "b young" <by0ung@brigham.net>
    Subject: Advice on headsets
    Any have a recommendation for headsets designed for this high-noise environment? I look forward to a spirited discussion on this issue... Thanks, Dave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave I bought Telex Echelon ANR 150 headsets... and out of the box the mike levels were so loud that the intercom had a problem handling the signals,,, I called the factory and they told me to adjust the mike gain down, since then I have been quite happy, I am using the Sigtronics spo22n intercom powered off the aircraft power. Boyd Young MkIIIC


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:45:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 912ULS integrated alternator question
    From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
    JetPilot wrote: > Lucien, > > From what I understand of the system, there is not a problem with running no load on the stator / magnet system . I would replace the bad part and head on out to monument valley ! > > Mike Well tested stator on my lunch break with the light bulb test. Nearly burnt out my spare 50W landing light even at idle..... so the stator is fine which is a big sigh of relief....... I'll have the new R/R tomorrow if lockwood had it in stock today.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242689#242689


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:56:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0@gmail.com>
    Thanks for the info on the Telex! Is it really the only digital unit on the market? I have an Ivo 2-blade prop. I wonder if it lives in the same high frequency range as the 3-blade you're describing. We have a 912 ULS spinning it. Right now, we're leaning toward the unit that John H. recommended, mostly because of the price. I may get a Telex too, if I can get Aircraft Spruce or another vendor to authorize a return after we compare the results side-by-side. By the way, I talked to my partner, Jeff and he said he did try adjusting the squelch in flight...I was too busy gazing around in wonder, and dodging Cessnas to notice. Thanks again for all the great suggestions, you guys. Dave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242692#242692


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:32:00 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    > Right now, we're leaning toward the unit that John H. recommended, mostly because of the price. > Dave Dave: I bought the first DRE-6000 several years ago. Recently bought the second set. Several reasons I fly with them: 1-They work well for me. 2-When you need something, you can call DRE at Pahrump, NV, and talk to the folks that run the company. It is a small company that wants to make sure their customers are satisfied. I was serious enough about being comfortable when I fly, I spent big bucks for a DC X11, their top of the line, for around 8 hundred dollars. Beautiful lightweight composite headset that worked great in my living room and kitchen, but could not produce in the cockpit of a mkIII. Had to send them back to Aircraft Spruce. Discovered Aircraft Spruce was carrying the DRE brand again and ordered my second set. john h mkIII


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:38:39 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip
    From: "John Bickham" <gearbender@bellsouth.net>
    Hey Mike, I'll try to answer your questions: > maybe someone on the trip will have a laptop so you guys can post photos. The photos you see are straight from the cell phone while out and about. That is the plan to post almost real time. Picture quality isn't that great but OK. Will down load higher quality camera photos if I get a chance. I'm not packing a laptop. > How long have you been flying your MK III C, did you build it, and how many hours on it now ? > Got airworthiness cert May, 2001. I built it with a lot help from some the original listers. I was on my own building it and couldn't have done it without the support of this list. I have sorta re-built after bending it up on the way to MV 2004. Poor pilot decision making, complicated by some radiant fog. Butt crack of dawn morning starts aren't always a good idea with a lot of moisture coming off the Gulf. Ended up with a much better and more capable aircraft the second time. I like the second edition a lot better. I think I knocked into trim. Flies faster and the new landing gear are too good sometimes. Only have 550 hours on it. I've shared the story on the list back when it happened. This trip is a huge hurdle for me. If I am successful, I will tell you the whole story when I get back if you'd like. If I'm not successful, you don't need to hear from a real dummy. I'll just say this, don't think it couldn't happen to you. That is the trap. Do not archive. -------- Thanks too much, John Bickham Mark III-C w/ 912UL St. Francisville, LA Landing a plane and being married - a few smooth moments mixed with a lot of rough ones. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242709#242709


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:16:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "lucien" <lstavenhagen@hotmail.com>
    Watkinsdw wrote: > Thanks for the info on the Telex! Is it really the only digital unit on the market? > > I have an Ivo 2-blade prop. I wonder if it lives in the same high frequency range as the 3-blade you're describing. > We have a 912 ULS spinning it. > > Not sure if it's the only digital sampling one on the market or not, but it's probably the best one if there are others. It works equally well at nulling out the low frequencies as well, so it should be a pleasant surprise either way. In a friend's RV-6A, it all but eliminates the low thrumming of the prop making for very comfortable flying. But it also does a good job with the scream of our 912's too. One thing it doesn't do is filter out abrupt changes in sound or odd sounds like the mild prop harmonic noise I get with my WD - this is by design so you can't miss or ignore something abnormal..... This is a really good feature.... LS -------- LS Titan II SS Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242718#242718


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:24:06 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip
    Butt crack of dawn morning starts aren't always a good idea with a lot of moisture coming off the Gulf. > > John Bickham John B: Is the coffee ready before or after the "butt crack of dawn"? The boy from LA sure has a way with words. One week and counting. Also doing a little weather dance to insure I can get out of Alabama and into Texas Tuesday week. Mike Marker says we are having pizza Wednesday night, but we have to get to Los Lunas, NM, in order to get it. Thursday night we can eat a Navajo Taco at Goulding's Restaurant. Weather is lousy in Alabama, about like it was when I got up the second morning in Sherman, TX, last year. Lots of thunder storms. john h mkIII


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:28:59 PM PST US
    From: "Richard & Martha Neilsen" <NeilsenRM@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip
    John H& B You all have a great time at Monument Valley. Wonderful blue bird afternoon in Michigan. Another day or two to get a flyable runway. Do not archive Rick Neilsen Redrive VW powered MKIIIC ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:23 PM Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: If you care to follow the MV trip > > > Butt crack of dawn morning starts aren't always a good idea with a lot of > moisture coming off the Gulf. >> >> John Bickham > > > John B: > > Is the coffee ready before or after the "butt crack of dawn"? > > The boy from LA sure has a way with words. > > One week and counting. > > Also doing a little weather dance to insure I can get out of Alabama and > into Texas Tuesday week. > > Mike Marker says we are having pizza Wednesday night, but we have to get > to Los Lunas, NM, in order to get it. > > Thursday night we can eat a Navajo Taco at Goulding's Restaurant. > > Weather is lousy in Alabama, about like it was when I got up the second > morning in Sherman, TX, last year. Lots of thunder storms. > > john h > mkIII > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:05:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    From: "Watkinsdw" <david.watkins0@gmail.com>
    Thanks, John, thanks, Lucien (is that Lucy-in the sky...?) Jeff is ordering a pair of DRE's this week. If they outperform my expensive Bose headset, I'm buying a pair, too. You guys have been very helpful. By the way, I've been reading the prop talk, and was especially impressed by your performance numbers on the WD you fly, John. You know our plane and our 2 blade IVO. When we are ready to spend some more money.. what WD do you recommend for Steven's plane? Down the road, we're also thinking about floats, but that's down the road, or canal, a bit.. Dave Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=242735#242735


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:18:49 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    > By the way, I've been reading the prop talk, and was especially impressed by your performance numbers on the WD you fly, John. You know our plane and our 2 blade IVO. When we are ready to spend some more money.. what WD do you recommend for Steven's plane? > > Dave I have had good luck with 70, 71, and 72" Warp Drive, 3 blade, fast taper, nickle steel leading edge. If pitched to turn 5,500 rpm wide open throttle, straight and level flight, you will get a good all around performing, reliable prop. John W ran a 68" 3 blade WD on his Kolbra. Out climbed and out ran me with his 912ULS. Often wondered is I could do better if I went smaller, but never got around to testing shorter blades. I think I am about maxed out with the 71" blades I am running now. MKIII's hit an invisible wall about 85 mph. More HP to penetrate that wall is wasted. john h mkIII


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:56:40 PM PST US
    From: "Gary" <kolber@atcyber.net>
    Subject: Re: Advice on headsets
    I shopped for headsets at Oshkosh a few years ago, willing to pay virtually any price for something more effective than the David Clark passive headsets that I used for years in type certified aircraft. I wanted something I could use for both my Kolb Mark IIIc (Rotax 582) and also for open canopy wind noise in another aircraft I own. I looked at Bose and the top-of-the line David Clark, Telex, and numerous others. I explained my needs, stressing wind noise in the one aircraft and 2 cycle high RPM noise in the Kolb. Both Bose and David Clark told me I would be disappointed in their products for what I needed. I talked with virtually every headset exhibitor at the show. One that impressed me was the Clarity Aloft, ear bud type. I looked at their frequency attenuation graphs and the attenuation up over 40 db - higher than even the ANR type headsets (which seem to offer only about 28 db). The attenuation over much of the frequency spectrum with the Clarity Aloft is relatively flat. I also liked the idea of virtually no weight on my head (a few ounces) and fact I could wear any type hat I wanted. Since they are passive, they also require no batteries. They proved to be great, both in the Kolb and on long cross countries in my other plane - no more headset squeeze after hours of flying. They have a music input (stereo) and the fidelity is phenomenal. I use with an IPod. The down side - $500 a piece and the foam ear tips must be periodically replaced. (They can be washed and use extended.) They have numerous patents on them. The mike is very high quality and the speakers are said to be equivalent to very high end hearing aids. I have done A-B type comparison tests in the Kolb with these headsets and ANR headsets of very high quality- including Lightspeed and David Clark. There is no comparison - night and day difference. If you want, you can combine with the traditional style headset (passive or ANR) and wear both, but I have found no advantage. So I use only the Clarity Aloft by itself. I use with a Sigtronics intercom modified by Sigtronics for high noise environment. No more problems communicating with my passenger, even at take-off power setting in the 582. Worth every penny I paid for them. They are also much more effective at reducing wind noise than anything else I have tried. Gary Siegrist Mark IIIc




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --