Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:34 AM - Re: Stupid question (Thom Riddle)
2. 06:34 AM - John Hauck (Larry Cottrell)
3. 06:48 AM - Re: John Hauck (william sullivan)
4. 07:38 AM - Re: Re: camcorders? (Larry Cottrell)
5. 04:19 PM - Re: 912 installation (albertakolbmk3)
6. 05:48 PM - Re: Re: Stupid question (gliderx5@comcast.net)
7. 05:53 PM - Re: Stupid question (Paul Folbrecht)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Stupid question |
Malcolm,
>From Part 61.31 I read the following:
(i) Additional training required for operating tailwheel airplanes. (1) Except
as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act as pilot in
command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and logged flight
training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane and received
an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized instructor who found
the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel airplane. The flight
training must include at least the following maneuvers and procedures:
(i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;
(ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such landings);
and
(iii) Go-around procedures.
(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section is
not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel airplane
before April 15, 1991.
Where does the NOT REQUIRED part appear in the FARS, except for the grandfathered
tailwheel pilots who logged time before 1991?
--------
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Kolb Slingshot SS-021
Jabiru 2200A #1574
Tennessee Prop 64x32
Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.
- Edward Abbey
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297577#297577
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I just got off the phone with John. He managed to crash his Mountain
Bike yesterday evening, splitting his tibia. (good leg :-/ )He is in
Jackson Hospital awaiting surgery. He is in good spirits, but sadden by
the fact that he is going to have to miss Monument Valley this year.
I will keep the list posted on his condition.
Larry
Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history,
which includes my email address.
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
- Thanks, Larry.- Give him my best wishes.- Keep us posted.- What i
s this about his good leg?- He's got a bad one?
-
-------------------------
--------------------- Bill Sulliv
an
-------------------------
--------------------- Windsor loc
ks, Ct.
-------------------------
--------------------- FS 447
do not archive
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Thanks John, I just looked it up and it sounds very good. I like my
camera mounted on the nose cone of the Firestar, I am curious about how
the camera handles the vibrations that our planes puts out. Why don't
you take a break from all that work and strap it on our your plane and
give us a demo. I would most likely mount a "tripod" type screw on the
pitot tube holder to put the camera out where it has an uninterrupted
view.
Looks like I didn't do that good a job of taking care of the "old fart"
huh?
Larry
Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history,
which includes my email address.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Bickham
To: kolb-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:29 PM
Subject: Kolb-List: Re: camcorders?
<gearbender@bellsouth.net>
Hey Larry,
Your video productions have been an inspiration to me. So I recently
bought a little camera. You might find it worth looking at. Google
Tachyon XC. They have some sample vids on Youtube. I got it cause it
is waterproof (ie resistant) and shockproof. The waterproof part is
kinda needed down here in LA.
There is a Micro version that is pretty small. How much weight can
Peg haul? You can even lash it to the "QUAD" on one of your trecks down
to the Owyhee.
I haven't had much time to fly with it. But I did take some nice
videos of my grandson in the surf in FL. Spent the last three days on a
tractor cutting drainage ditches and cresting my runway. I'm sleeping
in a half twisted position, looking backwards!
Starting to get down that I'm not headed your way for a visit. Take
care of the old fart [Laughing]
--------
Thanks too much,
John Bickham
Mark III-C w/ 912UL
St. Francisville, LA
I know many pilots and a few true aviators. There is a distinct
difference that I have the greatest respect for.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297565#297565
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 912 installation |
Could someone supply me with a measurement from the rear lord to the prop side
of the prop flange of a 912 installation? It would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Tony
--------
Tony B.
Kolb MKIII C
Rotax 582
C Gearbox 3.00:1
WD 66" 3 Blade Prop
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297653#297653
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Stupid question |
Thom
I must admit that I find the sport pilot rules to be some of the most confusing
rules that I have ever read. Below is my interpretation and I believe that it
is correct, but I certainly see where someone might think otherwise.
Part 61, Subpart J, 61.303, if you hold a (1) medical certificate, and you hold
(ii) at least a recreational pilot certificate with a category and class rating,
then you may operate (A) any light sport aircraft in that category and class,
and (1) you do not have to hold any of the endorsements required by this subpart,
nor do you have to comply with the limitations in 61.315.
61.319 You may operate any aircraft within the category, class, and set for which
you have endorsement. (but PPSEL does not need endorsements)
For single engine, land aircraft there are 6 sets (tricycle, tail wheel, and ski
below 87 kts, and same 3 above 87 kts)
So, when you put this together a PPSEL can fly any single engine land based LSA,
in any set, without any further endorsements.
61.31 is outside of subpart J and therefore does not apply.
Malcolm
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thom Riddle" <riddletr@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 7:33:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Stupid question
Malcolm,
>From Part 61.31 I read the following:
(i) Additional training required for operating tailwheel airplanes. (1) Except
as provided in paragraph (i)(2) of this section, no person may act as pilot in
command of a tailwheel airplane unless that person has received and logged flight
training from an authorized instructor in a tailwheel airplane and received
an endorsement in the person's logbook from an authorized instructor who found
the person proficient in the operation of a tailwheel airplane. The flight
training must include at least the following maneuvers and procedures:
(i) Normal and crosswind takeoffs and landings;
(ii) Wheel landings (unless the manufacturer has recommended against such landings);
and
(iii) Go-around procedures.
(2) The training and endorsement required by paragraph (i)(1) of this section is
not required if the person logged pilot-in-command time in a tailwheel airplane
before April 15, 1991.
Where does the NOT REQUIRED part appear in the FARS, except for the grandfathered
tailwheel pilots who logged time before 1991?
--------
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Kolb Slingshot SS-021
Jabiru 2200A #1574
Tennessee Prop 64x32
Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.
- Edward Abbey
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297577#297577
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Stupid question |
Interesting. This is the reason I asked the question. Anyway, IMO you'd be pretty
foolish to teach yourself TG landing no matter how much tricycle time you
have. Anyway #2, my interest has moved from Kolb to Rans S-12.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=297667#297667
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|