Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:36 AM - Photos For New Web Site (kolbaircraft)
2. 07:21 AM - Re: Photos For New Web Site (John Hauck)
3. 08:05 AM - Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question (Richard Neilsen)
4. 08:37 AM - Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question (Richard Girard)
5. 01:32 PM - Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question (cristalclear13)
6. 02:01 PM - Re: Happy First Flight Day (George Bearden)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Photos For New Web Site |
Hey Everyone
We are building a new web site and would like to ask all the members here to
submit a good picture of your Kolb aircraft
Please email your picture to morgantechnical@yahoo.com
Thanks to everyone on this awesome list and Merry Christmas to each and everyone
of you.
Kind Regards
Travis
Kolb CO.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=324011#324011
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Photos For New Web Site |
We are building a new web site and would like to ask all the members here
to submit a good picture of your Kolb aircraft
Travis
Kolb CO.
Travis/Gang:
Thanks for the new web site. I always enjoy looking at everyone's Kolbs.
Maybe you all could put a photo of the pilot/builder with the photo of his
airplane also.
Thanks for being there when we need you all. Hopefully, Kolb folks will
realize the importance of supporting Kolb Aircraft now and in the future.
Life would be very difficult without you all providing kits, parts,
technical support, and your friendship.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from hauck's holler, alabama.
john h
mkIII - Miss P'fer
Titus, Alabama
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question |
We really miss John Williamson in situations like this. He would have given
us chapter and verse from memory. You are missing the text that is buaried
somewhere in the FARs It does require that a amiture built experimental
aircraft be (anything more than minor work) maintained by a A&P (or work
signed off by a A&P) or the origional builder with a repairman's
certificate. I have a repairmen's certificate that was a pain to get from
the FAA when they issued my plane's airworthyness certificate.
Rick Neilsen
Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net> wrote:
> Jack, Rick,
>
> Technically, the FARs don't even require an annual inspection for an
> experimental aircraft, but the operating limitations almost always specif
y
> an annual "condition inspection" to be performed by an A&P. To do regula
r
> maintenance, or even major alterations, on an experimental aircraft you
> don't need anything:
>
> =A7 43.1 Applicability.
>
> (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, this pa
rt
> prescribes rules governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance,
> rebuilding, and alteration of any=97
>
> (1) Aircraft having a U.S. airworthiness certificate;
>
> (2) Foreign-registered civil aircraft used in common carriage or carriage
> of mail under the provisions of Part 121 or 135 of this chapter; and
>
> (3) Airframe, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, and component par
ts
> of such aircraft.
>
> *(b) This part does not apply to=97
>
> (1) Any aircraft for which the FAA has issued an experimental certificate
,
> unless the FAA has previously issued a different kind of airworthiness
> certificate for that aircraft...
>
> *See also <http://www.wanttaja.com/avlinks/MAINT.HTM>.
>
> -Dana
> --
> Daddy, what does "Formatting Drive C:" mean?
>
> *
>
===========
===========
===========
============*
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question |
Rick, The FAR that Dana has quoted is correct. Not only can ANYONE work on
an E-AB or E-LSA, they can charge money for it, too. As has been pointed
out, the exception is any kind of conditional inspection. An E-AB requires
a
repairman certificate for the original builder or an A & P (but no IA is
required) for subsequent owners, an E-LSA requires any of the LSARI, LSARM,
or A & P certificates.
As far as major repairs go, your operating limitations probably require you
to notify your local FSDO, but this is primarily so they can issue new
operating limitations that put the aircraft back into phase one testing and
establish your testing area.
Rick Girard
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Richard Neilsen <neilsenrm@gmail.com>wrot
e:
> We really miss John Williamson in situations like this. He would have giv
en
> us chapter and verse from memory. You are missing the text that is buarie
d
> somewhere in the FARs It does require that a amiture built experimental
> aircraft be (anything more than minor work) maintained by a A&P (or work
> signed off by a A&P) or the origional builder with a repairman's
> certificate. I have a repairmen's certificate that was a pain to get from
> the FAA when they issued my plane's airworthyness certificate.
>
> Rick Neilsen
> Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Dana Hague <d-m-hague@comcast.net> wrote
:
>
>> Jack, Rick,
>>
>> Technically, the FARs don't even require an annual inspection for an
>> experimental aircraft, but the operating limitations almost always speci
fy
>> an annual "condition inspection" to be performed by an A&P. To do regul
ar
>> maintenance, or even major alterations, on an experimental aircraft you
>> don't need anything:
>>
>> =A7 43.1 Applicability.
>>
>> (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, this
>> part prescribes rules governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance,
>> rebuilding, and alteration of any=97
>>
>> (1) Aircraft having a U.S. airworthiness certificate;
>>
>> (2) Foreign-registered civil aircraft used in common carriage or carriag
e
>> of mail under the provisions of Part 121 or 135 of this chapter; and
>>
>> (3) Airframe, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, and component
>> parts of such aircraft.
>>
>> *(b) This part does not apply to=97
>>
>> (1) Any aircraft for which the FAA has issued an experimental certificat
e,
>> unless the FAA has previously issued a different kind of airworthiness
>> certificate for that aircraft...
>>
>> *See also <http://www.wanttaja.com/avlinks/MAINT.HTM>.
>>
>> -Dana
>> --
>> Daddy, what does "Formatting Drive C:" mean?
>>
>> *
>>
>> "_blank">www.aeroelectric.com
>> .com/" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com
>> ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com
>> _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
>> get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
>> ttp://forums.matronics.com*
>>
>>
> *
>
===========
===========
===========
============*
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Kolb Mk IIIC
582 Gray head
4.00 C gearbox
3 blade WD
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unabl
e
to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.
- G.K. Chesterton
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Kolb / Rotax503 Question |
Wouldn't you want to come from the other direction to replace those (take the wire
out of your splitter)?
--------
Cristal Waters
Kolb Mark II Twinstar
Rotax 503 DCSI
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=324079#324079
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | RE: Happy First Flight Day |
> Just think the world owes TV to the limmys. Would that be credit or blame?
IMHO, blame, except for Benny Hill of course.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|