Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:41 AM - christopher davis wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn (christopher davis)
2. 05:49 AM - Construction Videos (kolbaircraft)
3. 06:00 AM - Re: prop for 447 on UltraStar? (Masqqqqqqq@aol.com)
4. 06:05 AM - Re: prop for 447 on UltraStar? (Masqqqqqqq@aol.com)
5. 06:53 AM - Re: Construction Videos (Richard Pike)
6. 08:36 AM - Re: Re: N213 Wreck (jerb)
7. 09:26 AM - Re: Construction Videos (kolbaircraft)
8. 09:55 AM - Re: Re: N213 Wreck (Ellery Batchelder Jr)
9. 11:27 AM - New Firestar II builder (AtomicDog)
10. 02:10 PM - Re: New Firestar II builder (frank goodnight)
11. 09:51 PM - New Skis...short video (ces308)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | christopher davis wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn |
LinkedIn
------------
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- christopher davis
christopher davis
Owner at F/V Daniel Makayla
Barnstable/Yarmouth, Massachusetts Area
Confirm that you know christopher davis
https://www.linkedin.com/e/21yuvg-gkiaiz1j-x/isd/2384492013/e9ElKivo/
--
(c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Construction Videos |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQXviexucHo&feature=feedu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw6mr4Tliuc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0Ls1tY5UTw&feature=related
Travis
Kolb CO.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331929#331929
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: prop for 447 on UltraStar? |
I started with the 2 blade prop, and found it just wouldn't contain the
power of the engine with the 2.58:1 ratio. Engine would just over rev.
Spinning the prop faster with the 2:1 ratio made it all good, the rpms can be
contained at about 6200 at full power. Never did try the 2.58:1 gears with
the 4 blade prop.
I think I've read that you would want at least a 60 inch prop for the
2.58:1 ratio, but they might have been talking a 2 blade prop too.
In a message dated 2/22/2011 7:46:52 P.M. Central Standard Time,
thewanderingwench@yahoo.com writes:
I have a friend to whom I'm going to loan my 4-blade ultraprop for his
Ultrastar, on which he's putting a 447. Reading this thread, I realize that he
may not want to use it. He has to fold his wings to get in the hangar.
Also, you write that: "the first thing I had to do was have the B box
converted to a 2:1 ratio."
I've been using the prop with a 2:58 ratio B gear box on a 503. Is this
just too much for a 447? Is that why you had to reduce the ratio?
Arty Trost
Sandy, Oregon
www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com/uladventure2009.htm
"Life's a daring adventure or nothing"
Helen Keller
"I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death."
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Masqqqqqqq@aol.com <Masqqqqqqq@aol.com> wrote:
From: Masqqqqqqq@aol.com <Masqqqqqqq@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: prop for 447 on UltraStar?
I have used both a 2 blade Precision Prop, and a 4 blade Ultra Prop. Both
are ground adjustable, but I don't remember the pitch I used.
First thing I had to do was have the B box converted to a 2:1 ratio.
My overall preference is for the 2 blade prop. Because I had to fold
and trailer the machine every time I used it, the 4 blade prop had to be
removed every time, and the 2 blade could stay on. I never tried a 3
blade, and don't know if the wings can fold over it.
Another thing I noticed was the 4 blade prop took a little longer to
wind up, because of the extra weight. It was also a little noticeable in
maneuvering, giving a gyroscopic lag to changing direction. But not much
really. The four blade was a bit quieter than the 2 blade prop.
I only flew it a couple times with the original Cuyuna before it
coughed up a piston, so can't speak about the climb rate............but it's very
good with the Rotax. I was getting about 800 fpm, until I gained some
weight (me not the machine).
I tried to sell my equipment about a year ago, and I guess I asked
way too much, so it's still all available. Maybe you need an engine mount
for that Rotax?
In a message dated 2/19/2011 8:36:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
d-m-hague@comcast.net writes:
My UltraStar currently has the original Cuyuna engine with the 50x30
Culver
prop. I just acquired a 447, which I plan to install. Can anybody tell
me
what is a good prop for this combination? I believe (need to confirm)
that
it's a 2.58 ratio B box. I'm thinking 3 blades due to the limited
diameter
possible on the US, can't go 4 blades and fold the wings... perhaps even
smaller than 50" to give better ground clearance?
A friend gave me the engine in the interest of me being quieter than I am
with the 447; a number of people have commented on how loud my plane is.
Also for anybody who's flown the US with both engines, how much
performance
increase should I expect? I calculate about 350fpm better climb in theory.
-Dana
--
Art and technical perfection are not the same thing in cars, and hard-core
car buffs often prefer art. Which is why they own so many e ies ay
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site p;
="_blank" href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://ww
rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://forums.matronics.com">htgt;
(http://www.matronics.com/======<br><br></font></b><font%20color=)
(http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List)
(http://www.matronics.com/contribution)
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: prop for 447 on UltraStar? |
Both props are 50 inch.
I looked through all my pics, and don't have a decent shot of the
engine mount. It will be spring before I can get to the machine to take pics.
Considering selling it intact, or parting it out. Here's the
original sale posting I made last year:
I guess I have to be realistic and say I won't be rebuilding my UltraStar,
and might as well part it out now.
I'd love to sell intact, but it's a bit overweight, and I missed the
deadline to grandfather into Sport Pilot. Here's what I got:
wings need fabric.
Rotax 447 with B gearbox. Point ignition. Probably time for a rebuild,
I put on 300 hours, after I got it used with no record of hours. It's got
the 2:1 gear ratio in the gearbox, and I have the other gear that makes it
1.56:1 (i think that's what it was)
Matco hydraulic brakes, not differential.
BRS chute.
Flaperon function, my own design. This cannot be separated from the
airframe.
2 props........a 2 blade wood Precision adjustable and a 4 blade
UltraProp adjustable.
Instruments: dual cylinder temp. dual exhaust temp. tachometer.
speedometer. altimeter.
Original set of 2 gas tanks, holding 3 gallons between them. 5 gallon
seat tank.
Com helmet. Delcom handheld radio.
Open trailer custom fit to the UltraStar.
Make me offers for parts, or all of it together. Machine is located in
Central Wisconsin.
_Masqqqqqqq@aol.com_ (mailto:Masqqqqqqq@aol.com)
In a message dated 2/22/2011 8:15:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
d-m-hague@comcast.net writes:
At 07:47 PM 2/22/2011, Masqqqqqqq@aol.com wrote:
I have used both a 2 blade Precision Prop, and a 4 blade Ultra Prop. Both
are ground adjustable, but I don't remember the pitch I used.
First thing I had to do was have the B box converted to a 2:1 ratio.
That's what I though I needed to do, but both the GSC and WD people say
their 3 blade is OK with the 2.58, though I'd need a 2 blade if I regeared
the box to 2:1..
My overall preference is for the 2 blade prop. Because I had to fold and
trailer the machine every time I used it, the 4 blade prop had to be
removed every time, and the 2 blade could stay on. I never tried a 3 blade, and
don't know if the wings can fold over it.
The wings will clear a 3 but not a 4, so the 4 is out. Were both of yours
50" diameter?
I only flew it a couple times with the original Cuyuna before it coughed
up a piston, so can't speak about the climb rate............but it's very
good with the Rotax. I was getting about 800 fpm, until I gained some
weight (me not the machine).
That's good to hear... I think mine is around 500 with the Cuyuna.
I tried to sell my equipment about a year ago, and I guess I asked way too
much, so it's still all available. Maybe you need an engine mount for
that Rotax?
Maybe... what does the Rotax mount look like? I was thinking of an
adapter plate for the Cuyuna mount, but that will put the prop lower than the
original, so less ground clearance. Were you trying to sell the whole plane
or just bits and pieces?
-Dana
--
"You sure it's broken? Let me make sure..."
(http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List)
(http://www.matronics.com/contribution)
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Construction Videos |
Great videos, and excellent background music. Who is the artist on the music?
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331935#331935
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Yea Ralph, I think your in the same thinking as me. My thought of
the previous post writing off Wrap Drive has reached a premature
conclusion. I've been on several UL & light plane list for years and
I can't recall reading of any others coming apart. A few Ivo's, but
the Wrap Drives have been pretty solid for years. There had to be a
reason. Would like to hear what the FAA's findings are after
examining remaining part of that blade..
jerb
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Construction Videos |
Richard
Thank you for the good words.
The audio is from Itunes public domain music
Acoustic Classics Volume 5
I hope the videos will help guys understand the construction procedures for our
design.
Travis
Kolb CO.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331943#331943
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
when the NTSB come up with an answer I will post it
Ellery Batchelder Jr.
-----Original Message-----
From: jerb <ulflyer@verizon.net>
Sent: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 11:30 am
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: N213 Wreck
Yea Ralph, I think your in the same thinking as me. My thought of the prev
ious post writing off Wrap Drive has reached a premature conclusion. I've
been on several UL & light plane list for years and I can't recall readin
g of any others coming apart. A few Ivo's, but the Wrap Drives have been
pretty solid for years. There had to be a reason. Would like to hear what
the FAA's findings are after examining remaining part of that blade..
jerb
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
========================
============
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | New Firestar II builder |
Just wanted to say hello. I have just recently received my Firestar II kit from
Kolb. I am so happy I was able to get this fine aircraft. I was afraid Kolb had
stopped making this kit because it was not listed on their web suite. However,
after surfing around this wonderful forum, I was encouraged to call Travis
at Kolb and pursue my dream.
I did have the chance to purchase partially completed kits, but I enjoy the building
process as much as I do flying. This will be the 4th plane I have built,
but I always have questions and am still learning. So, I want to just say hello
and look forward to forum knowledge and participation.
--------
Building Firestar II
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331952#331952
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New Firestar II builder |
Hi,=0A=0AWhere do you live?=0A=0AFrank=0A=0Ado not archive=0A=0A=0A________
________________________=0AFrom: AtomicDog <MStudio828@aol.com>=0ATo: kolb-
list@matronics.com=0ASent: Wed, February 23, 2011 1:23:18 PM=0ASubject: Kol
icDog" <MStudio828@aol.com>=0A=0AJust wanted to say hello. I have just rece
ntly received my Firestar II kit from =0AKolb. I am so happy I was able to
get this fine aircraft. I was afraid Kolb had =0Astopped making this kit be
cause it was not listed on their web suite. However, =0Aafter surfing aroun
d this wonderful forum, I was encouraged to call Travis at =0AKolb and purs
ue my dream.=0A=0AI did have the chance to purchase partially completed kit
s, but I enjoy the =0Abuilding process as much as I do flying. This will be
the 4th plane I have =0Abuilt,=0Abut I always have questions and am still
learning. So, I want to just say hello =0Aand look forward to forum knowled
ge and participation.=0A=0A--------=0ABuilding Firestar II=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARe
ad this topic online here:=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p
=========================0A
=======================
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | New Skis...short video |
Hello all,
I went up today for a bit and was wondering what the skis looked like when landing
so I tried taking some video to see what the were doing...and they were doing
what they were supposed to be doing ! DUH !
Just something to look at....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onztij0fCs4
chris ambrose
M3X/Jabiru A-2200
N327CS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331988#331988
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|