Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:15 AM - Re: Florida Video (Sky Biker)
2. 04:48 AM - Aixro XR50 (chris davis)
3. 04:55 AM - Re: New Camera Mount (william sullivan)
4. 05:06 AM - Re: Aixro XR50 (william sullivan)
5. 06:57 AM - Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT (racerjerry)
6. 07:21 AM - What mic cover/muff do you use? (gotime242)
7. 11:09 AM - Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? (HShack@aol.com)
8. 11:37 AM - Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? (russ kinne)
9. 11:57 AM - Re: new camera mount. (Arksey@aol.com)
10. 12:05 PM - Sunday morning flying (Thom Riddle)
11. 12:30 PM - Re: Re: new camera mount. (Phil)
12. 01:06 PM - No N number (SS568)
13. 02:00 PM - Re: Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT (b young)
14. 02:08 PM - Re: No N number (Gregory S Taylor)
15. 05:14 PM - Re: No N number (Ellery Batchelder Jr)
16. 05:16 PM - Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? (pete)
17. 05:34 PM - Re: No N number (gliderx5@comcast.net)
18. 06:24 PM - Re: No N number (SS568)
19. 06:33 PM - Re: Re: Oshkosh (Arksey@aol.com)
20. 06:40 PM - Re: Re: No N number (Richard Girard)
21. 06:45 PM - new video...oil cooler test flight (ces308)
22. 06:58 PM - Re: Re: new camera mount. (Arksey@aol.com)
23. 07:12 PM - Re: New Camera Mount (ces308)
24. 07:36 PM - Re: New Camera Mount (Mystic)
25. 08:23 PM - Re: Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT (Richard Girard)
26. 08:38 PM - Re: Re: No N number (b young)
27. 09:01 PM - Re: Re: No N number (Richard Girard)
28. 09:14 PM - Re: Re: No N number (Bob)
29. 09:18 PM - Re: Re: No N number (Richard Girard)
30. 11:11 PM - Re: Re: No N number (b young)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Great video and now you have seen my world as I live just south of the rive
r and between Clewiston and LaBelle. If you was to have followed SR 80 whi
ch is parallaled the river you would have seen the hang glider field and tu
gs towing them up.
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Florida Video
From: neilsenrm@gmail.com
David
Thanks. That was a real treat watching the video. I have flew from Lansing
=2C MI to Oshkosh=2C WI with Steven Green usually watching that fat two bla
ded IVO pushing Steven's plane much faster than I could fly. I also flew Fa
t Albert all day at the old Kolb factory just before flying my MKIII for th
e first time. Then again a few years later at New Kolb getting a biannual c
heck ride. It looks different now. I spend all winter in Florida and now re
nt to get airborn during the winter months. I have never flown over that ar
ea so it was great. I assume that that was the cross Florida intercostal wa
ter way.
Thanks again. Packing for Oshkosh.
Rick Neilsen1st Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC
On Sun=2C Jul 17=2C 2011 at 6:12 PM=2C Watkinsdw <david.watkins0@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi=2C Kolbers=2C
Thought you might enjoy this video shot by a friend yesterday as a flight o
f five flew from Airglades (2IS) in Clewiston=2C Florida to Labelle (X14).
There were two Kolbs=2C a Flyboy=2C (Czech plane) and two Drifters. The yel
low MKIII is "Fat Albert=2C" one of the original Kolb factory demo's=2C flo
wn by Peter Volum=2C who has owned her for 12 years. Mine=2C the red and ye
llow MKIII was built by Stephen Green=2C and I've owned her for 2.5 happy y
ears.
The two drifters are based at Airglades=2C and are flown by two long-time u
ltralighters=2C Andy and Paul.
The Flyboy=2C and Fat Albert are based at "Richards"=2C a private grass str
ip NE of Homestead General (X51.)
A great day was had by all=2C as we checked out some open land that Andy is
thinking of developing as a fly-in camping retreat near Labelle.
You can see that this part of South Florida has just received some much nee
ded rain=2C after a severe drought this spring. They got 5 inches in about
24 hours.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYfAUt8MlqE
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=346803#346803
arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
http://forums.matronics.com
le=2C List Admin.
="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Has anyone dealt with this engine? Know the Price etc?weight?any other rotary
engine within reason price wise?
Chris Davis
KXP 503 492 hrs
Glider Pilot
Disabled from crash building Firefly
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New Camera Mount |
- John- Great!- Not too much vibration, and incredible clarity.- With
the camera mounted by the tail, it gives a completely different perspectiv
e than most of the videos.- Do more.
- Where are you?
-
-------------------------
-------------------- Bill Sullivan
-------------------------
-------------------- Windsor Locks,
Ct.
-------------------------
---------------------FS 447
--- On Sat, 7/23/11, Mystic <cheoah68@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Mystic <cheoah68@gmail.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: New Camera Mount
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFmsacX2fT4
John Tempest
Firestar "Classic"
447
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347511#347511
le, List Admin.
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
- Chris- Looks very interesting.- I couldn't seem to find details in a
short search.- I hope you can.- They do sell an aircraft model- XR40- b
ut no specs or price on that.- What about reduction?- They are saying o
ver 10k rpm max.?- Something to keep in mind if the rumor of the 447 demi
se is true.- Vibration would be way down.
-
-------------------------
----------------- Bill Sullivan
--- On Sun, 7/24/11, chris davis <capedavis@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: chris davis <capedavis@yahoo.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: Aixro XR50
Has anyone dealt with this engine? Know the Price etc?weight?any other rota
ry
engine within reason price wise?
-Chris Davis
KXP 503 492 hrs
Glider Pilot
Disabled from crash building Firefly
le, List Admin.
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT |
I am assuming that you are speaking of a new axle weldment or axle shaft at the
WHEEL end of the aluminum landing gear leg. The job is not easy. It helps if
you
#1 Get lucky
#2 Have a good friend with a machine shop
Let me describe a method which is best done on a rigid Bridgeport mill.
Set up your airplane on a garage / hangar floor with new weldment (axle shaft)
in place. Set everything up at the desired toe angle and carefully make an index
mark on both weldment and gear leg where they join so that you are able to
re-establish the same position after gear leg and weldment are removed from the
airplane. You really need some weight on the wheel to get the correct settings,
so you may have to re-check by clamping (pinching) the weldment to the gear
leg or jam something in the socket to keep it from swiveling.
After your index marks are made, you need to find a steel shaft to act as a guide
pin which fits snug but will freely pass through the existing hole in the gear
leg. I believe your Firestar uses an AN4 (1/4 inch) bolt to attach the weldment.
I recommend a hardened steel dowel pin, but hack sawing the ends off
of a long hard grade 8 bolt from the hardware store will work too. The guide
pin needs to be hard or it can bend and screw up your setup. The idea is to place
the guide pin in the mills drill chuck (with mill spindle lowered) and firmly
clamp the gear leg to the mills table so that the guide pin will pass through
the existing hole in the gear leg as the chuck is lowered.
Next, the axle shaft / weldment is placed on the clamped gear leg with index marks
lined up and a small pilot hole is drilled into the weldment. You need
to start with a small drill bit and work up in steps so that you will put minimum
pressure on the clamped gear leg so as to not move it out of position. After
each drilling, you may want to remove the weldment and use the guide pin to
check that the gear leg has not moved out of position. When you are ready to
drill the final (1/4 inch) size, drill the hole so that it just breaks through
the first side of the steel weldment tube and does not penetrate into the aluminum
gear leg.
You do not want to remove any aluminum with the drill bit. After the first side
of the hole is drilled, it is tempting to keep going through to the other side
DONT!
Again, start with the small drill bits to slowly open up the opposite side of the
tube. When you are ready for the final pass with the inch drill bit, the
bit will quickly pass through, with minimum aluminum contact.
I know that friends with Bridgeport mills are hard to come by and you may be tempted
to try this procedure on a drill press. If you can at least use a drill
press with a wide production table, it may give you enough room for a clamping
fixture, but the mill is a lot more rigid and easier.
Good luck and remember that if you are flying off a grass strip, your toe settings
are not really all that critical.
P.S. When making the index marks, you dont want to put deep scribed lines, especially
circumferential ones, on the aluminum gear leg. Layout dye or a very
light coat of spray paint will allow light scribing without digging into and marring
the aluminum. The gear leg is rugged, but we want no excuses for a fatigue
crack to start.
--------
Jerry King
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347543#347543
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | What mic cover/muff do you use? |
Hello all,
I wear a normal david clark headset in my FSII with a very low windscreen, i basically
have the wind coming directly at my head. I can communicate somewhat by
having the volume way up (listen to static the whole time) and placing my hand
over the mic when needing to talk.
What is everyone doing, or what product are people using for their microphones?
I was looking around at different mic muff options but just wanted to see what
people have found works best.
Thanks!
-Dylan
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347546#347546
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? |
You could extend your windshield up to the wing. [biggest improvement I
have made to the FS II except maybe VG's]. Get a noise cancelling headset
[the absolute best for a FS II is the Victor {ANR}. All this from memory but
they are actually made & warranteed by Lightspeed. Look up "aircraft
headsets" on eBay. You will find them on the first page for under $300. I
think it comes with a foam mic muff.
If I REALLY want to get my message through, I will cover the mic with my
hand & maybe even cut engine rpm's some.
Howard Shackleford
FS II
SC
In a message dated 7/24/2011 10:22:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
dylanshine@gmail.com writes:
What is everyone doing, or what product are people using for their
microphones? I was looking around at different mic muff options but just wanted
to
see what people have found works best.
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? |
Dylan
Any time a mic is used in the wind, a wind-sock will improve xmission greatly.
Just a tubular sleeve of foam-plastic, 1/4 or 1/2" thick, will do fine. You can
just cut one out with scissors and tape it together. Look at the TV reporters
--= they all use them.
Russ
On Jul 24, 2011, at 10:19 AM, gotime242 wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I wear a normal david clark headset in my FSII with a very low windscreen, i
basically have the wind coming directly at my head. I can communicate somewhat
by having the volume way up (listen to static the whole time) and placing my
hand over the mic when needing to talk.
>
> What is everyone doing, or what product are people using for their microphones?
I was looking around at different mic muff options but just wanted to see what
people have found works best.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Dylan
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347546#347546
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: new camera mount. |
re: john tempest you tube video.....
the video was interesting..would like to know camera you were using and
mount. I liked the way it showed the plane and the terrain...I am old and not
into video yet as my interenet speed is a bit slow for video...that should
be improving this fall so I may get into video myself and should start
gathering info..Input from all in regard to camera and mounting will be of
interest to many in the future, I would think...You are a lot bolder pilot than
I am....but I am a old pilot....thanks....blue skys and safe flying...jswan
Jim Swan Kolb Firestar ll, 503 Rotax , 6147 Wilcox Rd., Eaton Rapids, Mi
48827 ph 517-663-8488 GPS GPS FOR MY RUNWAY N 42 deg 28.581 W084deg 44.825
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Sunday morning flying |
Bob Bean and I agreed to meet at his place this morning and then to fly from there
to Hendershot's fly-in (34NY) near the Ontario Lake shore just west of Rochester,
NY.
I figured BB would be waiting for me on the ground but as you will see in the video
I took of my approach, and eventual landing, we almost met on final. I started
filming long before I arrived at BB's so nothing much to see until the last
minute or so. Just, beautiful WNY countryside.
http://www.youtube.com/user/thomriddle?feature=mhee#p/a/u/1/wj8YzF1fnB8
I had planned to video our departure from BB's but the field was so rough, it joggled
off the video function in my iPhone. Once airborne, though, I shot a bit
of me following BB's SuzyQ powered MkIII. I was closer to BB in the air than
it appears in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/user/thomriddle?feature=mhee#p/a/u/0/a_GFF20vBPM
--------
Thom Riddle
Buffalo, NY (9G0)
Kolb Slingshot SS-021
Jabiru 2200A #1574
Tennessee Prop 64x32
Truth is what stands the test of experience.
- Albert Einstein
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347578#347578
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RE: new camera mount. |
Hi Jim:
Sure is flat where you live. Nice, long runway!
For a camera, I purchased the Tachyon OPS HD, $139 plus S/H ($152.84). I ha
ve yet to receive it-("Coming this August"), but Tachyon-seems to be po
pular and-I'm going on faith.
http://www.tachyoninc.com/
For a mount, it seems to me vibration can be abated by attaching the camera
to a "brick" and then soft-mounting the brick to your plane. Then, all you
have to worry about is wind-buffeting. Now, who would want to affix a bric
k to their plane? Well, probably someone that wants-vibration-free video.
Catch-22.
-
When I get my camera, I'll test this theory, of course. Obviously, the theo
ry is some kind of dead-weight that shrugs off vibration. Not necessarily a
brick; maybe a 6" galvie or black-pipe nipple, 2" or 3" dia.?
Phil H. - [future] Firefly
--- On Sun, 7/24/11, Arksey@aol.com <Arksey@aol.com> wrote:
From: Arksey@aol.com <Arksey@aol.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: RE: new camera mount.
re: john tempest you tube video.....
the video was interesting..would like to know camera you were using and mou
nt. I liked the way it showed the plane and the terrain...I am old and not
into video yet as my interenet speed is a bit slow for video...that should
be improving this fall so I may get into video myself and should start gath
ering info..Input from all in regard to camera and mounting will be of inte
rest to many in the future, I would think...You are a lot bolder pilot than
I am....but I am a old pilot....thanks....blue skys and safe flying...jswa
n
-
Jim Swan Kolb Firestar ll, 503 Rotax , 6147 Wilcox Rd., Eaton Rapids, Mi 48
827 ph 517-663-8488 GPS GPS FOR MY RUNWAY N 42 deg 28.581 W084deg 44.825
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
There is a kolb on barnstormers for sale. It was converted from a tandem seating
to a side by side.
The ad also says the N number will have to be removed. It also said the inspection
was not completed.
I have read recently that if some inspection was not completed on time that the
FAA would not reissue, even to a new owner.
Can anyone comment on this N number issue, or am i confusing it with something
else.
Thanks,
David d.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347588#347588
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT |
to drill a new weldment into an existing axel.
take a piece of tube that will fit over the axel that is is large enough
to fit over the weldment. split the tube so it could be clamped on the
axel without movement. place a bolt through the hole in the axel. and
slide a small tube over both ends of the bolt these will serve as a drill
alignment jig. weld the small tubes to the end of the tube that is
clamped to the axel. pull the bolt out, then install the weldment at the
proper alignment, now you have a drill alignment tube that is lined up with
the hole in the axel.
to modify this procedure to give you some adjustment,,, when installing
the bolt through the axel.... use a 1/4 do ax 3/16 id tube for a bushing
through the axel, then install a 3/16 inch rod through the bushing and
axel hole, weld a 3/16 inch id drill guide tube to the split, clamped
tube, then drill the weldment with a 3/16 inch drill.. leaving the
bushing in place position the weldment on the plane with a 3/16 " bolt.
check for alignment, if it is ok drill out the hole to fit, if not
file or drill out the hole to correct the alignment then drill to final
size,
the biggest problem with this method is the tapered gear leg. that will
make it harder to clamp to securely. so be careful. it may be necessary
to make 3 or 4 splits and heat the tube so it can be bent to fit the taper.
you can use this jig like a blind rivet hole locater.
boyd young
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Dave,
Not too long ago I sold a FS 1 back to the person I bought it off of
because I found out from the FAA that if it was not certified by Jan. 2010
and had a airworthy certificate that I could not register it, and If I could
not get it below the 254 lb. ultralite weight that I would not legally be
able to fly it. I gave 3000 for the plane and I have about 8 or 9 grand in
my Private/IFR ticket so I decided it wasn't worth the risk of my license to
fly the FS even though it was fun to fly. For what it's worth I plan to find
one that is legal to fly. If you can't keep the N-number then it/s just a
lawn ornament.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of SS568
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 4:05 PM
Subject: Kolb-List: No N number
There is a kolb on barnstormers for sale. It was converted from a tandem
seating to a side by side.
The ad also says the N number will have to be removed. It also said the
inspection was not completed.
I have read recently that if some inspection was not completed on time that
the FAA would not reissue, even to a new owner.
Can anyone comment on this N number issue, or am i confusing it with
something else.
Thanks,
David d.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347588#347588
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I talked with a FAA Rep in my area and they are willing to bend a bit to
help some people out
Ellery Batchelder Jr.
-----Original Message-----
From: SS568 <david@PaulowniaTrees.com>
Sent: Sun, Jul 24, 2011 4:04 pm
Subject: Kolb-List: No N number
There is a kolb on barnstormers for sale. It was converted from a tandem
eating to a side by side.
he ad also says the N number will have to be removed. It also said the
nspection was not completed.
have read recently that if some inspection was not completed on time that
the
AA would not reissue, even to a new owner.
an anyone comment on this N number issue, or am i confusing it with someth
ing
lse.
hanks,
avid d.
ead this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347588#347588
========================
===========
-= - The Kolb-List Email Forum -
-= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse
-= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription,
-= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ,
-= Photoshare, and much much more:
-
-= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
-
-========================
========================
===========
-= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
-= Same great content also available via the Web Forums!
-
-= --> http://forums.matronics.com
-
-========================
========================
===========
-= - List Contribution Web Site -
-= Thank you for your generous support!
-= -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
-= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution
-========================
========================
===========
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: What mic cover/muff do you use? |
Try Oregon Aero military upgrade kits for microphones Mic Muffs. Pete
----- Original Message -----
From: "russ kinne" <russkinne@mac.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: What mic cover/muff do you use?
>
> Dylan
> Any time a mic is used in the wind, a wind-sock will improve xmission
> greatly. Just a tubular sleeve of foam-plastic, 1/4 or 1/2" thick, will do
> fine. You can just cut one out with scissors and tape it together. Look at
> the TV reporters --= they all use them.
> Russ
>
> On Jul 24, 2011, at 10:19 AM, gotime242 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I wear a normal david clark headset in my FSII with a very low
>> windscreen, i basically have the wind coming directly at my head. I can
>> communicate somewhat by having the volume way up (listen to static the
>> whole time) and placing my hand over the mic when needing to talk.
>>
>> What is everyone doing, or what product are people using for their
>> microphones? I was looking around at different mic muff options but just
>> wanted to see what people have found works best.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Dylan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347546#347546
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
David
The N number is usually not a problem, but that is just the registration that shows
that you own it. The difficult part is the airworthiness certificate. The
January 2010 deadline that for light sport. You can still register it as an experimental
amateur built any time, as long as you can document that it was built
by amateurs. This will require a builders log, including photos of the building
process. If the seller has that information then it should not be a huge
deal to get the airworthiness certificate. If he does not have it, then you probably
will not be able to make it legal to fly.
Malcolm Morrison
http://home.comcast.net/~mmorrison123/index.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: "SS568" <david@PaulowniaTrees.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 4:04:37 PM
Subject: Kolb-List: No N number
There is a kolb on barnstormers for sale. It was converted from a tandem seating
to a side by side.
The ad also says the N number will have to be removed. It also said the inspection
was not completed.
I have read recently that if some inspection was not completed on time that the
FAA would not reissue, even to a new owner.
Can anyone comment on this N number issue, or am i confusing it with something
else.
Thanks,
David d.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347588#347588
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Do I have this right?
If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have an N number,
but desirable.
It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
David d
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347614#347614
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Jim Swan Kolb Firestar ll, 503 Rotax , 6147 Wilcox Rd., Eaton Rapids, Mi
48827 ph 517-663-8488 GPS GPS FOR MY RUNWAY N 42 deg 28.581 W084deg 44.825
In a message dated 7/24/2011 1:16:19 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
gab16@sbcglobal.net writes:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: George Bearden <gab16@sbcglobal.net>
> I'm going, will be there Monday through Wednesday.
I'm there now, for the week.
GeoB
your guys that are going to be at Oshkosh...keep us posted if you can as
to what is interesting and what ever...pictures also if you can for us that
are at home but wish we were there...when I am at fly ins with my Kolb
firestar it always seems to be interesting to people....I am betting that
people are going to be interested in the new Kolb 2 place firestar with a nose
wheel..weather here in mich. has been a lot better for flying...hot but cool
in the morning and evening...I have been in the air about ever
evening....sure is fun in the Firestar ll ....looking at the wildlife and crops....blue
skys..safe flying...jswan
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
No, David, you have it wrong. The problem is that it was registered as an
LSA but the airworthiness certificate was never issued (I looked up the N
number). It is not legal to fly as it is and because it was previously
registered as an LSA it can't be legally re-registered as an Amateur built
now.
So, unless you need spare parts, or you want a really nifty lawn ornament,
leave it be.
Rick Girard
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:22 PM, SS568 <david@paulowniatrees.com> wrote:
>
> Do I have this right?
> If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have an
> N number, but desirable.
> It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
> Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
>
> David d
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347614#347614
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
- Groucho Marx
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | new video...oil cooler test flight |
Hello all...
I got the new oil cooler on and took her for a ride to see how she works....works
good ! It dropped my cruise temp by 50* !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXlXdbL7_zI
Thanks for watching ! Safe trips to all going to Oshkosh...
chris ambrose
M3X/Jabiru A-2200 199.3 hrs
N327CS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347616#347616
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RE: new camera mount. |
Hi Phil.,,,
yes in southern mich where I am at it is only small rolling
hills....had trouble when a kid to find hill big enough to ski down in the
winter....mix of farm lands and woods...and a few small lakes....so runway's are
sort
of easy here....yes I got more runway than I need for the Kolb but I had
the land and room and it adds a bit of safety and other airplanes can come
in....I do have a slight hill in the runway but it seems to be more of help
than hindrance....I sure have a lot of fun flying the Firestar around the
area, even at the price of gas it is still cheaper than a lot of planes and
the visiblity is so good that it makes looking around from the air a
enjoyment...plus learning to land the Kolb for a old general aviation pilot is
sort of fun also...I am also a member of the Kolb group on facebook and post a
lot of pictures on there....if i get into the video thing the Kolb should
make a good platform to take some interesting stuff.....thanks for your
info...jswan
Jim Swan Kolb Firestar ll, 503 Rotax , 6147 Wilcox Rd., Eaton Rapids, Mi
48827 ph 517-663-8488 GPS GPS FOR MY RUNWAY N 42 deg 28.581 W084deg 44.825
Hi Jim:
Sure is flat where you live. Nice, long runway!
For a camera, I purchased the Tachyon OPS HD, $139 plus S/H ($152.84). I
have yet to receive it ("Coming this August"), but Tachyon seems to be
popular and I'm going on faith.
_http://www.tachyoninc.com/_ (http://www.tachyoninc.com/)
For a mount, it seems to me vibration can be abated by attaching the
camera to a "brick" and then soft-mounting the brick to your plane. Then, all
you have to worry about is wind-buffeting. Now, who would want to affix a
brick to their plane? Well, probably someone that wants vibration-free video.
Catch-22.
When I get my camera, I'll test this theory, of course. Obviously, the
theory is some kind of dead-weight that shrugs off vibration. Not necessarily
a brick; maybe a 6" galvie or black-pipe nipple, 2" or 3" dia.?
Phil H. - [future] Firefly
--- On Sun, 7/24/11, Arksey@aol.com <Arksey@aol.com> wrote:
From: Arksey@aol.com <Arksey@aol.com>
Subject: Kolb-List: RE: new camera mount.
re: john tempest you tube video.....
the video was interesting..would like to know camera you were using and
mount. I liked the way it showed the plane and the terrain...I am old and not
into video yet as my interenet speed is a bit slow for video...that should
be improving this fall so I may get into video myself and should start
gathering info..Input from all in regard to camera and mounting will be of
interest to many in the future, I would think...You are a lot bolder pilot
than I am....but I am a old pilot....thanks....blue skys and safe
flying...jswan
Jim Swan Kolb Firestar ll, 503 Rotax , 6147 Wilcox Rd., Eaton Rapids, Mi
48827 ph 517-663-8488 GPS GPS FOR MY RUNWAY N 42 deg 28.581 W084deg 44.82
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New Camera Mount |
Nice job !
That was entertaining ! I have to try and make a mount like that !
keep them coming !!!
chris ambrose
M3X/Jabiru A-2200
N327CS
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347619#347619
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: New Camera Mount |
I fly out of Tokeena airpark in Oconee County SC. We're at the foothils of the
Blue Ridge mountains, and I feel lucky to fly here. Lots of forest, with just
enough hayfields and pastures (and water) to make ya feel safe.
Very little traffic too.
Glad ya like.
John Tempest
Firestar "Classic"
447
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=347620#347620
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: DRILLING HOLE IN NEW WELDMENT |
There's actually a first step to any of these methods and that is to examine
the hole in the gear leg. Is it centered? Is it the correct size? Is there
any sign that the gear leg has been bent? This is the time to determine if
it is in serviceable condition. Maybe you want to replace the gear leg if
it's questionable. If you're happy with the old gear leg, here's another way
to get a precise hole.
Get a small piece of hardwood, ply wood, or particle board (hardwood is
best) about 1" X 3" X 6", a couple of tongue depressors, a small can of
Bondo, a 3" C clamp, and a 1/4" transfer punch.
Place the new weldment on the landing gear leg and align loosely, say +/- a
degree or two. Clamp the block to the gear leg normal to the existing bolt
hole with the tongue depressors as spacers so that the new weldment can be
taken on and off without disturbing the block. When you're satisfied that
the block is close to 90 degrees to the hole and the weldment slides off and
on easily, mix a batch of Bondo and glue the block to the gear leg with it.
Let harden about 15 minutes. Drill thru the board using the landing gear
hole as a guide. Slide the weldment back on to the gear leg and align it
carefully. Put the transfer punch through the hole in the board and tap the
end with a hammer. Remove the weldment and drill the hole out on a drill
press. Start with a smaller drill, say a #40, so you make sure the drill
stays centered on the punch mark and work up. Deburr and check that the
transfer punch fits nicely in the hole. Put the weldment back on the landing
gear leg, align and put the transfer punch through the board, the first hole
in the weldment, and the landing gear leg. Check alignment. Tap the transfer
punch. Remove the weldment and drill the punch mark, making sure to align
drill bit in the center of the first hole. Again, start small and drill up
so the drill doesn't push to one side. Remove the clamp, knock the board
off, remove the remaining bondo and install the weldment.
Rick Girard
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:54 PM, b young <byoungplumbing@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> to drill a new weldment into an existing axel.
>
> take a piece of tube that will fit over the axel that is is large enough
> to fit over the weldment. split the tube so it could be clamped on the
> axel without movement. place a bolt through the hole in the axel. and
> slide a small tube over both ends of the bolt these will serve as a drill
> alignment jig. weld the small tubes to the end of the tube that is
> clamped to the axel. pull the bolt out, then install the weldment at the
> proper alignment, now you have a drill alignment tube that is lined up with
> the hole in the axel.
>
> to modify this procedure to give you some adjustment,,, when installing
> the bolt through the axel.... use a 1/4 do ax 3/16 id tube for a bushing
> through the axel, then install a 3/16 inch rod through the bushing and
> axel hole, weld a 3/16 inch id drill guide tube to the split, clamped
> tube, then drill the weldment with a 3/16 inch drill.. leaving the
> bushing in place position the weldment on the plane with a 3/16 " bolt.
> check for alignment, if it is ok drill out the hole to fit, if not
> file or drill out the hole to correct the alignment then drill to final
> size,
>
> the biggest problem with this method is the tapered gear leg. that will
> make it harder to clamp to securely. so be careful. it may be necessary
> to make 3 or 4 splits and heat the tube so it can be bent to fit the taper.
>
> you can use this jig like a blind rivet hole locater.
>
> boyd young
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
- Groucho Marx
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
guess I have not seen the tail number,,,, if it was registered as a
lsa,,, why cant it remain a lsa? I am having trouble understanding
why it cant remain in the lsa category,, if the owner wanted to
keep the n number,,, why cant a new n number for lsa be issued?
what would have made the previously registered lsa airworthiness
invalid?
I have not done any research,,, but if the tail number was reserved,,,
and never granted because the inspection was never done,,,, could it be
a experimental armature built by reserving a new tail number and having
the inspection finalized? as long as the documentation is complete to
comply with the experimental classification. or reserve a new n number
and have it inspected lsa or experimental...
if the plane was an old fat ultralitght,,, and never registered
before the deadline,,, I could understand,,, but once registered lsa
it still should be good.
I dont know what I am missing here.
before I jumped to any conclusions,,, I would call get a hold of the
builder and find out the details,, and not guess at what is going on
then call the fisdo and get an answer before I spent my money.
does an air worthiness ever go out of date,,,, or just need an annual
inspection, or was an faa re registration letter sent out and
ignored... I believe there was a grace period to renew,,, or another
time frame to reapply.
confused,,, which is not as hard as it use to be.
boyd young
mkiii utah
quote
Do I have this right?
If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have
an N number, but desirable.
It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
David
It is not legal to fly as it is and because it was previously registered
as an LSA it can't be legally re-registered as an Amateur built now.
Richard
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Here's the data from the FAA data base.
Aircraft Description Serial NumberD R B 2Type RegistrationIndividual
Manufacturer
NameKOLBCertificate Issue Date09/04/2007ModelFIRESTARExpiration Date
09/30/2012Type AircraftFixed Wing Single-EngineStatusValidPending Number
ChangeNoneType Engine2 CycleDate Change AuthorizedNoneDealerNoMFR YearNoneM
ode
S Code51066413Fractional OwnerNO
------------------------------
Registered Owner NameBOWMAN DANNY R Street717 N MORGAN ST CityMEADVILLE
StatePENNSYLVANIACountyCRAWFORDZip Code16335-2122CountryUNITED STATES
------------------------------
Airworthiness Engine ManufacturerUnknownClassificationUnknown Engine Mode
l
UnknownCategoryNone A/W DateNone
The A/W certificate was never issued. The last date to do that was January
31st 2010. You can't get it now.
21.191 Experimental certificates.
Experimental certificates are issued for the following purposes:
(i) *Operating light-sport aircraft. *Operating a light-sport aircraft that
=97
(1) Has not been issued a U.S. or foreign airworthiness certificate and doe
s
not meet the provisions of =A7103.1 of this chapter. An experimental
certificate will not be issued under this paragraph for these aircraft afte
r
January 31, 2008; (this was extended to 2010 PROVIDED the aircraft was
registered by the 2008 date)
I've asked both the local FSDO and the Light Sport Branch in Oklahoma City
if there is ANY way they will issue an E-AB certificate for one of these
aircraft and the answer is always NO.
Rick Girard
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:35 PM, b young <byoungplumbing@gmail.com> wrote:
> **
> guess I have not seen the tail number,,,, if it was registered as a
> lsa,,, why cant it remain a lsa? I am having trouble understanding why
it
> cant remain in the lsa category,, if the owner wanted to keep the n
> number,,, why cant a new n number for lsa be issued?
>
> what would have made the previously registered lsa airworthiness invali
d?
>
> I have not done any research,,, but if the tail number was reserved,,,
> and never granted because the inspection was never done,,,, could it be
a
> experimental armature built by reserving a new tail number and having the
> inspection finalized? as long as the documentation is complete to compl
y
> with the experimental classification. or reserve a new n number and have
it
> inspected lsa or experimental...
>
> if the plane was an old fat ultralitght,,, and never registered before
> the deadline,,, I could understand,,, but once registered lsa it still
> should be good.
>
> I dont know what I am missing here.
>
> before I jumped to any conclusions,,, I would call get a hold of the
> builder and find out the details,, and not guess at what is going on th
en
> call the fisdo and get an answer before I spent my money.
>
> does an air worthiness ever go out of date,,,, or just need an annual
> inspection, or was an faa re registration letter sent out and
> ignored... I believe there was a grace period to renew,,, or another
> time frame to reapply.
>
> confused,,, which is not as hard as it use to be.
>
> boyd young
> mkiii utah
>
> quote
>
> Do I have this right?
> If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have
an
> N number, but desirable.
> It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
> Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
>
> David
>
>
> It is not legal to fly as it is and because it was previously registered
as
> an LSA it can't be legally re-registered as an Amateur built now.
>
> Richard
>
>
> *
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
> *
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
- Groucho Marx
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I would not call the local Fisdo...Congress just laid most of them off
and any that are there are probably pretty pissed ... I have talked to
a guy at EAA headquarters several times...lost his name, but he is their
guru of odd ball experimental licensing I think he has seen just
about every non standard scenerio....If it can be fixed he will know how
and will make recommendations as to how to approach local FAA offices.
bob
From: b young
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: No N number
guess I have not seen the tail number,,,, if it was registered as a
lsa,,, why cant it remain a lsa? I am having trouble understanding
why it cant remain in the lsa category,, if the owner wanted to
keep the n number,,, why cant a new n number for lsa be issued?
what would have made the previously registered lsa airworthiness
invalid?
I have not done any research,,, but if the tail number was reserved,,,
and never granted because the inspection was never done,,,, could it be
a experimental armature built by reserving a new tail number and having
the inspection finalized? as long as the documentation is complete to
comply with the experimental classification. or reserve a new n number
and have it inspected lsa or experimental...
if the plane was an old fat ultralitght,,, and never registered
before the deadline,,, I could understand,,, but once registered lsa
it still should be good.
I dont know what I am missing here.
before I jumped to any conclusions,,, I would call get a hold of the
builder and find out the details,, and not guess at what is going on
then call the fisdo and get an answer before I spent my money.
does an air worthiness ever go out of date,,,, or just need an annual
inspection, or was an faa re registration letter sent out and
ignored... I believe there was a grace period to renew,,, or another
time frame to reapply.
confused,,, which is not as hard as it use to be.
boyd young
mkiii utah
quote
Do I have this right?
If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have
an N number, but desirable.
It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
David
It is not legal to fly as it is and because it was previously registered
as an LSA it can't be legally re-registered as an Amateur built now.
Richard
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Boyd, I didn't answer the last part of your question. IF you do not
re-register an E-LSA that was issued an airworthiness certificate under the
"fat ultralight" provision, i.e. FAR 21.191 i (1) in the time allotted and
allow the registration to expire its airworthiness certificate is null and
void AND IT CANNOT BE RE-ISSUED (caps for emphasis, not yelling). Why?
Because the provision has expired, as have *all the forms* that serviced
that provision. There is no path to reissue an airworthiness certificate,
now. It's an unintended consequence of the re-registration scheme. I know
Edsel is probably tired of repeating this, but you can check it with him at
the Light Sport Branch. I haven't asked in a year, who knows, maybe there's
been a miracle and FAA's Legal Dept. has found a way. But that's the answer
that I got and it was confirmed by Roger Lee on the Rotax engines forum and
several others.
Please don't shoot the messenger. I didn't make the mess, I don't work for
the FAA.
Rick Girard
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Richard Girard <aslsa.rng@gmail.com>wrote
:
> Here's the data from the FAA data base.
> Aircraft Description Serial Number D R B 2Type Registration Individual
Manufacturer
> NameKOLB Certificate Issue Date09/04/2007 ModelFIRESTAR Expiration Date
> 09/30/2012 Type Aircraft Fixed Wing Single-EngineStatus ValidPending
> Number Change NoneType Engine 2 CycleDate Change Authorized NoneDealer No
MFR
> Year NoneMode S Code 51066413Fractional Owner NO
> ------------------------------
> Registered Owner Name BOWMAN DANNY R Street 717 N MORGAN ST City
> MEADVILLE StatePENNSYLVANIA County CRAWFORDZip Code 16335-2122 CountryUNI
TED
> STATES
> ------------------------------
> Airworthiness Engine ManufacturerUnknown ClassificationUnknown Engine
> Model UnknownCategory None A/W DateNone
>
> The A/W certificate was never issued. The last date to do that was Januar
y
> 31st 2010. You can't get it now.
> 21.191 Experimental certificates.
>
> Experimental certificates are issued for the following purposes:
>
> (i) *Operating light-sport aircraft. *Operating a light-sport aircraft
> that=97
>
> (1) Has not been issued a U.S. or foreign airworthiness certificate and
> does not meet the provisions of =A7103.1 of this chapter. An experimental
> certificate will not be issued under this paragraph for these aircraft af
ter
> January 31, 2008; (this was extended to 2010 PROVIDED the aircraft was
> registered by the 2008 date)
>
> I've asked both the local FSDO and the Light Sport Branch in Oklahoma Cit
y
> if there is ANY way they will issue an E-AB certificate for one of these
> aircraft and the answer is always NO.
>
> Rick Girard
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:35 PM, b young <byoungplumbing@gmail.com>wrote
:
>
>> **
>> guess I have not seen the tail number,,,, if it was registered as a
>> lsa,,, why cant it remain a lsa? I am having trouble understanding wh
y it
>> cant remain in the lsa category,, if the owner wanted to keep the n
>> number,,, why cant a new n number for lsa be issued?
>>
>> what would have made the previously registered lsa airworthiness
>> invalid?
>>
>> I have not done any research,,, but if the tail number was reserved,,,
>> and never granted because the inspection was never done,,,, could it be
a
>> experimental armature built by reserving a new tail number and having th
e
>> inspection finalized? as long as the documentation is complete to comp
ly
>> with the experimental classification. or reserve a new n number and hav
e it
>> inspected lsa or experimental...
>>
>> if the plane was an old fat ultralitght,,, and never registered befor
e
>> the deadline,,, I could understand,,, but once registered lsa it still
>> should be good.
>>
>> I dont know what I am missing here.
>>
>> before I jumped to any conclusions,,, I would call get a hold of the
>> builder and find out the details,, and not guess at what is going on t
hen
>> call the fisdo and get an answer before I spent my money.
>>
>> does an air worthiness ever go out of date,,,, or just need an annual
>> inspection, or was an faa re registration letter sent out and
>> ignored... I believe there was a grace period to renew,,, or another
>> time frame to reapply.
>>
>> confused,,, which is not as hard as it use to be.
>>
>> boyd young
>> mkiii utah
>>
>> quote
>>
>> Do I have this right?
>> If I go to see about a used LSA, then it is not necessary for it to have
>> an N number, but desirable.
>> It should have a current air worthiness cert. but if not?
>> Or if the air worthiness is out of date?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> It is not legal to fly as it is and because it was previously registered
>> as an LSA it can't be legally re-registered as an Amateur built now.
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>> *
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Zulu Delta
> Mk IIIC
> Thanks, Homer GBYM
>
> It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhapp
y.
> - Groucho Marx
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
- Groucho Marx
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Please don't shoot the messenger. I didn't make the mess, I don't work
for the FAA.
Rick Girard
>>>>>>>>>>>>
i am not going to shoot anyone,,,, i just didn't understand,,,, it
just seemed to me that if it was regisered lsa,,,, it could be re
registered lsa..
it is not my plane,,, not my problem.. just trying to understand
thanks/
boyd
do not archive
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|