Kolb-List Digest Archive

Fri 11/04/11


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:14 AM - Re: Headsets & hearing loss (Richard Pike)
     2. 08:14 AM - Re: Re: Headsets & hearing loss (b young)
     3. 08:32 AM - Re: Re: Headsets & hearing loss (Rick Neilsen)
     4. 02:16 PM - Re: Re: Headsets & hearing loss (Gary Aman)
     5. 03:08 PM - Advisory Circular 150/5345-27D (Dennis Thate)
     6. 05:09 PM - Re: Headsets & hearing loss (Richard Pike)
     7. 05:40 PM - Re: Re: Headsets & hearing loss (b young)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:14:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    [quote="jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne"]At 04:18 PM 11/2/11 -0700, you wrote: > > > > I have the same type of hearing problem. I tried the ear buds but I could > not keep them located in my ears. I went to a hearing aid salesman and > asked him to make me some ear molds. He did. I never got around to > mounting the ear buds, but I believe they will take care of the fall out > problem. Also, by making the right adaptor, one could use them while flying and on the lawn mower too, and may be get by just using ordinary muff ear protectors. > > Now if I can just find them.... > > Jack B. Hart FF004 > Winchester, IN You can make your own molded ear plugs fairly cheaply, and mold them to fit around the ear buds, but it may take you more than one attempt. I bought several sets of these Radians moldable ear plugs http://www.amazon.com/Radians-Custom-Molded-Earplugs-Red/dp/B002XULPSQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1320411520&sr=8-2 and experimented with them. They are perhaps a bit quieter, not sure, but I could not come up with a combination that stayed comfortable for any length of time under the pressure of the head set. And they are tricky to get to fit when you are trying to insert them and dealing with the short length of wire. Or maybe I didn't mold them right. I would mold the flexible stuff around the earbud and then have my wife help me to get them properly seated in the ear, where it would set up in just a few minutes. It was one of those things that almost worked. Since the plain earbuds fit my ears ok and don't fall out, I decided that is good enough. You can buy the silicone tips for earbuds in various sizes, and in my case, one size fits very well, and the others either fall out or are uncomfortable. I assume you have already experimented with this? -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) richard (at) bcchapel(dot)org Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=356882#356882


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:57 AM PST US
    From: "b young" <byoungplumbing@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    how about mounting a set of ear buds in something like this http://www.amazon.com/Surefire-Sonic-Defenders-Medium-Clear/dp/B0012XT8B6 /ref=pd_sim_sg_3 the link has better photo, and if you scroll down there are other options one of the options has a flap with a plug that would fit in the hole, so i am nearly sure they are hollow into the ear canal. been doing some searching for magnetic coupled connectors,,,, and found some patents and line drawings on what i would like to use to connect the ear buds to the inside of the headsets, but haven't been able to find a supplier. still looking. boyd young


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:46 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm@gmail.com>
    Gary Seems like I reported that your Jabiru powered MKIII was close to the quietest I have flown in. Let me qualify that by saying that you added a bunch of sound absorbing foam and it seems like your high quality head sets had the active noise cancelling kit installed. I have ringing in my ears all the time but after exposure to high noise levels it get worse for a bit. I don't remember that I noticed any extra ringing after flying in your plane but it was, what three years ago. The nosiest Kolb I ever flew in was a 503 powered MKIIIC with a cheep head set/intercom that had non standard plugs that I couldn't plug my Sigtronics into. At full throttle (which we did a lot of) the noise was down right pain full. The quietest Kolb was John H's MKIIIC. My theory is that big fuel tank mounted high in the cage is a large viscus mass that absorbs sound and noise producing vibration before it gets to the cockpit. I don't remember the headset I used but I don't think he had and active noise canceling in the passenger headset. That 912S was just a soft purr, well maybe a bit higher pitch. I compare it to the old factory MKIIIC demonstrator (fat albert) with the 912 which always got my ears ringing. One configuration of my VW powered MKIIIC was actually quieter than John H's. It was the high mount redrive VW. The high mount used the same Rotax style vibration dampers but the engine was mounted high over the Rotax mount so as to allow clearance to the oil sump on the bottom of the engine. The engine kind of floated on the mount twisting a bit under power. One of the dampers failed after about a hundred hours. The noise level was so low with the 3200 engine RPM at cruise and 2000 RPM prop that I actually took my headset off for the briefest moment to see how bad it was. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Gary Aman <zeprep251@aol.com> wrote: > Rick, > You wore the David Clarks when we rode in my MK3.Were they enough to be > comfortable or have I become accustomed to the din the Jabiru produces? > G.Aman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm@gmail.com> > To: kolb-list <kolb-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 2:44 pm > Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Headsets & hearing loss > > I'm currently using Sony ear buds under my Sigtronics head set that I > added the headset inc. active noise reduction kit to. I got some adapters > and plugged two sets of ear buds into my intercom one for me and one for my > passenger. The ear buds provide almost as much additional noise reduction > as ear plugs but do a better job with voice clarity than the heads sets so > it works very well. I have been flying with this set up for about four > years but now I occasionally loose one or both the ear bud connections and > have to wiggle the adapters to get it working again. Richard P has > developed a elegant solution but I wounder if a jack in the head set or in > the intercom for the ear buds might be a better long term solution. I'm > also getting close to wearing out the Sony ear buds and would not look > forward to soldering in a new set with each change. Those tiny wires are a > real pain with my fat fingers. I have never lost a ear seal from the ear > buds but I have discovered at least with the Sony buds that the little > handle on the ear buds bumps against the head set and isn't comfortable so > I have scored and broken off the little ear bud handles. > > Rick Neilsen > Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:27 AM, b young <byoungplumbing@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> i had wondered about using regular ear buds, and plugging them into the >> aux output on the intercom.. , sigtronics spo22n, and running the wires >> under the ear cup seals. at least for a test, before i connected them into >> the headset. as far as impedance,,, most ear buds, because they are >> placed in the ear canal and need to move a much smaller volume of air to be >> just as loud, and will have a much higher impedance than the speakers in >> the headsets. the biggest difference in the impedance would show up in >> how they are connected, series or parole, to the headset speaker. i have >> nothing but a gut feeling on this one but i think i would go with parole. >> instead of hard wiring them into the headset,,, i have wondered about a >> small magnetic coupled connection, kind of like the new apple computer >> laptop is using for the charging cable. this would eliminate ripping >> something loose should it get pulled by accident. >> opinions welcome >> >> boyd young >> \mkiii utah/ >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I've used regular earbuds under active headsets by just using an adapter >> & plugging the earbuds into the a/c's headset jack instead of the >> headset plug. The headset mic plug stayed in the regular configuration. >> In a homebuilt (RV-4 in this case), it's so quiet I worried a little bit >> that I might not hear a/c noise that I would *need* to hear. >> >> Charlie >> >> >> ====**==============================**= >> om" target="_blank">www.aeroelectric.com >> ooks.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com >> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/**contribution >> le, List Admin. >> ====**==============================**= >> arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/**Navigator?Kolb-List >> ====**==============================**= >> http://forums.matronics.com >> ====**==============================**= >> le, List Admin. >> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/**contribution >> ====**==============================**= >> >> >> >> > * > ic.com">www.aeroelectric.com > .buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.comhelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com > bution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > tor?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List > tp://forums.matronics.com > bution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > * > > * > > * > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:16:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    From: Gary Aman <zeprep251@aol.com>
    Rick, Adding all that Denso- Foam made the difference,in the center section in pa rticular. I think you are right about the liquid killing the noise in John' s plane.Took a tour of Kennedy space center last year and one of the intere sting pieces of information I recalled was the massive amounts of water the y poured on the launch pad at lift-off.I thought it was to cool the pad,but they said no,it was to control the noise. I still need to insulate the are as behind the fuel tanks.I have the foam,will carry it south with me this y ear and maybe get to it. Maybe meet up again with you and some of the guys that are local. G.Aman MK3C Jabiru 2200a -----Original Message----- From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm@gmail.com> Sent: Fri, Nov 4, 2011 11:32 am Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Headsets & hearing loss Gary Seems like I reported that your Jabiru powered MKIII was close to the quiet est I have flown in. Let me qualify that by saying that you added a bunch o f sound absorbing foam and it seems like your high quality head sets had th e active noise cancelling kit installed. I have ringing in my ears all the time but after exposure to high noise levels it get worse for a bit. I don' t remember that I noticed any extra ringing after flying in your plane but it was, what three years ago. The nosiest Kolb I ever flew in was a 503 powered MKIIIC with a cheep head set/intercom that had non standard plugs that I couldn't plug my Sigtronics into. At full throttle (which we did a lot of) the noise was down right pa in full. The quietest Kolb was John H's MKIIIC. My theory is that big fuel tank mounted high in the cage is a large viscus mass that absorbs sound and noise producing vibration before it gets to the cockpit. I don't remember the headset I used but I don't think he had and active noise canceling in t he passenger headset. That 912S was just a soft purr, well maybe a bit high er pitch. I compare it to the old factory MKIIIC demonstrator (fat albert) with the 912 which always got my ears ringing. One configuration of my VW powered MKIIIC was actually quieter than John H' s. It was the high mount redrive VW. The high mount used the same Rotax sty le vibration dampers but the engine was mounted high over the Rotax mount s o as to allow clearance to the oil sump on the bottom of the engine. The en gine kind of floated on the mount twisting a bit under power. One of the da mpers failed after about a hundred hours. The noise level was so low with t he 3200 engine RPM at cruise and 2000 RPM prop that I actually took my head set off for the briefest moment to see how bad it was. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Gary Aman <zeprep251@aol.com> wrote: Rick, You wore the David Clarks when we rode in my MK3.Were they enough to be com fortable or have I become accustomed to the din the Jabiru produces? G.Aman -----Original Message----- From: Rick Neilsen <neilsenrm@gmail.com> Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 2:44 pm Subject: Re: Kolb-List: Re: Headsets & hearing loss I'm currently using Sony ear buds under my Sigtronics head set that I added the headset inc. active noise reduction kit to. I got some adapters and pl ugged two sets of ear buds into my intercom one for me and one for my passe nger. The ear buds provide almost as much additional noise reduction as ear plugs but do a better job with voice clarity than the heads sets so it wor ks very well. I have been flying with this set up for about four years but now I occasionally loose one or both the ear bud connections and have to wi ggle the adapters to get it working again. Richard P has developed a elegan t solution but I wounder if a jack in the head set or in the intercom for t he ear buds might be a better long term solution. I'm also getting close to wearing out the Sony ear buds and would not look forward to soldering in a new set with each change. Those tiny wires are a real pain with my fat fin gers. I have never lost a ear seal from the ear buds but I have discovered at least with the Sony buds that the little handle on the ear buds bumps ag ainst the head set and isn't comfortable so I have scored and broken off th e little ear bud handles. Rick Neilsen Redrive VW Powered MKIIIC On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:27 AM, b young <byoungplumbing@gmail.com> wrote: i had wondered about using regular ear buds, and plugging them into the aux output on the intercom.. , sigtronics spo22n, and running the wires unde r the ear cup seals. at least for a test, before i connected them into the headset. as far as impedance,,, most ear buds, because they are placed in the ear canal and need to move a much smaller volume of air to be just a s loud, and will have a much higher impedance than the speakers in the head sets. the biggest difference in the impedance would show up in how they a re connected, series or parole, to the headset speaker. i have nothing bu t a gut feeling on this one but i think i would go with parole. instead of hard wiring them into the headset,,, i have wondered about a small magneti c coupled connection, kind of like the new apple computer laptop is using for the charging cable. this would eliminate ripping something loose shoul d it get pulled by accident. opinions welcome boyd young \mkiii utah/ I've used regular earbuds under active headsets by just using an adapter & plugging the earbuds into the a/c's headset jack instead of the headset plug. The headset mic plug stayed in the regular configuration. In a homebuilt (RV-4 in this case), it's so quiet I worried a little bit that I might not hear a/c noise that I would *need* to hear. Charlie om" target="_blank">www.aeroelectric.com ooks.com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution le, List Admin. arget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List http://forums.matronics.com le, List Admin. ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ic.com">www.aeroelectric.com .buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com help.com">www.homebuilthelp.com bution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution tor?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List tp://forums.matronics.com bution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution _blank">www.aeroelectric.com .com" target="_blank">www.buildersbooks.com ="_blank">www.homebuilthelp.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution get="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:08:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Advisory Circular 150/5345-27D
    From: "Dennis Thate" <retroman@frontier.com>
    Thanks for your inquiry. The standard for windsocks is found in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5345-27D. This says the windsocks have to indicate the proper direction at wind speeds as low as 3 knots and the windsock is supposed to stand straight out at speeds between 14 and 17 knots. When we changed vendors we made some observations of the competing windsocks. I dont think you can really judge the wind speed by looking at the windsock, but you can get a pretty good idea of the direction. Mn/DOT 651.226.2043 -------- Both optimists and pessimists contribute to our society. The optimist invents the airplane and the pessimist the parachute. ~Gil Stern These flying machines are just a fad and will never catch on Unknown Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=356925#356925 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc01797_135.jpg


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:18 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    byoungplumbing(at)gmail.c wrote: > how about mounting a set of ear buds in something like this > > http://www.amazon.com/Surefire-Sonic-Defenders-Medium-Clear/dp/B0012XT8B6/ref=pd_sim_sg_3 (http://www.amazon.com/Surefire-Sonic-Defenders-Medium-Clear/dp/B0012XT8B6/ref=pd_sim_sg_3) > > boyd young > How about if you got some small diameter silicone tubing - the size that they use on model airplanes - attach it to the passage that runs through the Sonic Defender insert and let it extend to outside and below the headset cushion, and then attach the ear bud at that point? Hanging a few inches below the headset muff, with the tubing lying between your head and the headset cushion. Attach the ear bud wires to the head set as described in my previous post. Now the ear bud is not being smashed up against your ear by the inside of the headset, and you ought to have the best of both worlds. Sound dampening from the headset and from the insert both. Thoughts? One caveat: some earbuds have an opening in the back for some sort of acoustic reason - if you used it in this manner, would it be better to seal that up? Would that not let sound pass through the earbud and on up the tube? -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) richard (at) bcchapel(dot)org Kingsport, TN 3TN0 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=356928#356928


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:40:47 PM PST US
    From: "b young" <byoungplumbing@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Headsets & hearing loss
    One caveat: some earbuds have an opening in the back for some sort of acoustic reason - if you used it in this manner, would it be better to seal that up? Would that not let sound pass through the earbud and on up the tube? -------- Richard Pike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the opening in the back an air passage way to eliminate pressure differences in the inner ear to the outside air pressure,, boyd young




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --