Today's Message Index:
----------------------
0. 12:20 AM - Make A List Contribution - It's Your Personal Squelch Button... (Matt Dralle)
1. 02:47 AM - Re: Re: Amazing Footage (Pat Ladd)
2. 06:18 AM - Re: Twinstar MkIII (Gary Aman)
3. 08:43 AM - Re: Twinstar MkIII (Ozarkflyer)
4. 04:09 PM - Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. (Ozarkflyer)
5. 05:03 PM - Re: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. (robert bean)
6. 05:05 PM - Re: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. (John Hauck)
7. 05:13 PM - Re: Amazing Footage (SS568)
8. 06:24 PM - Re: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. (Phil)
Message 0
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Make A List Contribution - It's Your Personal Squelch Button... |
There is an automatic "squelch button" of sorts for the Fund Raiser messages.
Here's how it works... As soon as a List member makes a Contribution through
the Matronics Fund Raiser web site, their email address is automatically added
to this year's Contributor List and they instantly cease to receive further Fund
Raiser messages for the rest of the month! Its just that simple! :-)
I really do appreciate each and every one of your individual Contributions to support
the Lists. It is your support that enables me to upgrade the hardware
and software that are required to run a List Site such as this one. It also goes
to pay for the commercial-grade Internet connection and to pay the huge electric
bill to keep the computer gear running and the air conditioner powered
on. I run all of the Matronics Email List and Forums sites here locally which
allows me to control and monitor every aspect of the system for the utmost in
reliably and performance. Your personal Contribution matters because, when combined
with other Listers such as yourself, it pays the bills to keep this site
up and running. I accept exactly ZERO advertising dollars for the Matronics
Lists sites. I can't stand the pop-up ads and all other commercials that are
so prevalent on the Internet these days and I particularly don't want to have
it on my Email List sites.
If you appreciate the ad-free, grass-roots, down-home feel of the Matronics Email
Lists, please make a Contribution to keep it that way!!
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Thank you!
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
[Note that there are certain circumstances where you might still see a Contribution
related message. For example, if someone replies to one of the messages,
when using the List Browse feature, or when accessing List message via the Forum.
The system keys on the given email address and since most of these are anonymous
public access methods, there is no simple way to filter them.]
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Amazing Footage |
Interesting the way the wing root is fully stalled with the feathers blowing
the wrong way and the tips are still flying.
Nice pic
Pat.
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Twinstar MkIII |
On my MK3C from the outside of the tires is 82".They just go between the wh
eel wells of a 8' wide car hauling trailer.I have the short spring steel ge
ar legs.
G.Aman
-----Original Message-----
From: Ozarkflyer <lragan@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sun, Nov 6, 2011 11:14 pm
Subject: Kolb-List: Twinstar MkIII
Anyone know what the distance between the main gear wheels is on a Twinstar
MkIII?
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357114#357114
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Twinstar MkIII |
Thanks. Exactly what I needed.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357203#357203
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. |
I'm trying to differentiate between a Twinstar and a Mk II, or maybe they're one
and the same. My understanding is that the Twinstar was originally a Mk II
with a 5" spar and typically a Rotax 503. When the Twinstar Mk III came out it
was beefed up with a 6" spar and typically a Rotax 582 plus some other minor
differences. Is there any difference between this Mk III and the Mk IIIC that
we know today, or is the Mk IIIC designation there to differentiate from a Mk
IIIX?
I'm so confused. :?
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357218#357218
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. |
easy to be confused. twinstar was a reference to side by side seating. Both the
mkII and MkIII were called twinstars (as far as I know)
and the MkIII was just an upgrade in structure heaviness. I have an original manual
that came with mine that called it a "caribbean"
-that's some kind of a Bean I think. heh heh.
-and now we have a new side by side Firestar, with a nose wheel no less, to confuse
you.
BB
MkIII (there never was a MkIIIC)
suzuki.
On 7, Nov 2011, at 7:07 PM, Ozarkflyer wrote:
>
> I'm trying to differentiate between a Twinstar and a Mk II, or maybe they're
one and the same. My understanding is that the Twinstar was originally a Mk II
with a 5" spar and typically a Rotax 503. When the Twinstar Mk III came out
it was beefed up with a 6" spar and typically a Rotax 582 plus some other minor
differences. Is there any difference between this Mk III and the Mk IIIC that
we know today, or is the Mk IIIC designation there to differentiate from a
Mk IIIX?
>
> I'm so confused. :?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357218#357218
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. |
I'm trying to differentiate between a Twinstar and a Mk II, or maybe they're
one and the same. My understanding is that the Twinstar was originally a Mk
II with a 5" spar and typically a Rotax 503. When the Twinstar Mk III came
out it was beefed up with a 6" spar and typically a Rotax 582 plus some
other minor differences. Is there any difference between this Mk III and
the Mk IIIC that we know today, or is the Mk IIIC designation there to
differentiate from a Mk IIIX?
***************************************
Twinstar: First Kolb two place, side by side, open cockpit with a nose cone
and small windshield. Powered with a 447. 7 rib wing and 5" spar and tail
boom.
Twinstar MKII: Enclosed Twinstar, 5" spar and tail boom, 7 rib wing,
powered with a 503.
Twinstar MKIII: 6" spar and tail boom, 10 rib wing, powered with a 582,
912UL and 912ULS.
The "c" was added to the MKIII after The New Kolb Aircraft Company purchased
Kolb Aircraft to differentiate between it and the new modified MKIIIx.
john h
mkIII (Built and flown long before the Extra was thought of, therefore no
"c" in my model number.)
Titus, Alabama
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Amazing Footage |
Sorta gives new meaning to "full flaps"
--------
Kolb Mark IIIX 582 Blue head
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=357223#357223
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. |
I had one of the original Twinstars back in '89; 5" spars and tail boom, si
de-by-side seating, dual rudders, single stick, Rotax 503, 5-gal tank, no n
osecone, canopy or flaps, before it was renamed to Mk. I can't remember how
many ribs.
Phil H.
--- On Mon, 11/7/11, John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> wrote:
From: John Hauck <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm trying to differentiate between a Twinstar and a Mk II, or maybe they'r
e
one and the same.- My understanding is that the Twinstar was originally a
Mk
II with a 5" spar and typically a Rotax 503.- When the Twinstar Mk III ca
me
out it was beefed up with a 6" spar and typically a Rotax 582 plus some
other minor differences.- Is there any difference between this Mk III and
the Mk IIIC that we know today, or is the Mk IIIC designation there to
differentiate from a Mk IIIX?
***************************************
Twinstar:- First Kolb two place, side by side, open cockpit with a nose c
one
and small windshield.- Powered with a 447.- 7 rib wing and 5" spar and
tail
boom.
Twinstar MKII:- Enclosed Twinstar, 5" spar and tail boom, 7 rib wing,
powered with a 503.--- ---
Twinstar MKIII:- 6" spar and tail boom, 10 rib wing, powered with a 582,
912UL and 912ULS.
The "c" was added to the MKIII after The New Kolb Aircraft Company purchase
d
Kolb Aircraft to differentiate between it and the new modified MKIIIx.
john h
mkIII (Built and flown long before the Extra was thought of, therefore no
"c" in my model number.)
Titus, Alabama
le, List Admin.
le, List Admin.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|