Today's Message Index:
----------------------
0. 12:10 AM - Just Two Days Left - Still Way Behind... (Matt Dralle)
1. 05:45 AM - Re: Re: Some success at last (Pat Ladd)
2. 07:49 AM - Re: Kolb-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 11/28/11 (b young)
3. 08:34 AM - Re: Some success at last (Frankd)
4. 10:13 AM - Re: Re: Some success at last (John Hauck)
5. 03:00 PM - Re: Re: Some success at last (Dana Hague)
6. 06:30 PM - Re: Firefly under 254 - How did you do it? (Tom Stephens)
Message 0
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Just Two Days Left - Still Way Behind... |
Dear Listers,
There are just two more days left in this years List Fund Raiser. Over the last
few weeks I have received some really nice comments from members on what the
Lists have meant to them. I have included some of them below. Please read over
the comments and ponder on your own feelings about the Lists and the support
and camaraderie you have found here.
We are still way behind last year in terms of the number of contributions. I really
want to keep providing these services to the homebuilt community, but it
take resources. Since there's no advertising budget or deep pockets to keep
the operation a float, its solely your generosity during the Fund Raiser that
keeps things going. Please make a Contribution today.
If you've been putting off showing your support for the Lists, now is the time
to do it!
Make a contribution with a Credit Card or though PayPal at that Matronics Contribution
web site:
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Or, drop a check in the mail:
Matronics / Matt Dralle
581 Jeannie Way
Livermore, CA 94550
Thank you in advance for your support!
Matt Dralle
Matronics Email List Administrator
==================== A Few List Member Comments =====================
I get a lot of useful information and satisfaction from belonging to
your groups. Somehow you foster a great sense of community without
the baggage that accompanies other lists.
Dave S.
We do appreciate you running the lists spam and advertising free.
Jeff P.
I am celebrating my first flight day and you and the lists deserve
a thanks since without it my build would have taken twice as long.
Chris L.
I enjoy the list. Have my morning coffee with it!
Buddy M.
Your lists are the best investment of my time and money, bar none,
when it comes to interfacing with my fellow amateur builders.
Owen B.
Keep it going!! Thanks for taking over.
Wallace J.
I enjoy the Pietenpol List a lot.
Malcolm Z.
Thanks for your great site! As a new CJ-6 owner, your web site is an
invaluable resource.
Ken B.
Great informational source.
Fred S.
Thanks for doing this!
Lance G.
Thank you for the service i do enjoy the many hours I use on line with
the banter/ serious technical items.
Noel G.
Thanks for the years of builder support.
Roy H.
Great forum!
Roger C.
Thank you VERY MUCH, Matt, for carrying on with this great service.
The "Europa" community really appreciates it. All the best, Svein - now
celebrating 10 years as a subscriber, I think!
Svein J.
Matt, I'm building a much nicer and safer airplane because of your efforts.
Robert D.
21 years for you 9 years for me on the Zenith lists. Could not imagine
building and flying without Matronics.
Brian U.
Thanks for ALL the hard work and time you put into maintaining these
forums. As an EAA Tech counselor I recommend them often.
Paul M.
This Pietenpol list is a huge part of the motivation that keeps me working
on my project. This has been a great place for meeting like minded folks
and getting help for the difficult parts.
Thomas S.
Thanks for the excellent service Matt.
Frank S.
Matt, I'm a Sonex building, but I have to say that the Piet group is without
a doubt the most interesting.
Ken M.
I can't tell you how much I appreciate the Piet List. This is one of my sanity
lifelines!
Daniel H.
Your site has provided us over the years with excellent connections to others
for advice. Good job!
Bob M.
Kolb List is my #1 source!
Henry V.
Matt, you do a great job with this site. I've been with it since the
beginning!
John M.
I am very grateful for all of your excellent work on the List.
Arthur L.
Thank you for the service you provide us all!
Nicholas C.
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Some success at last |
what change is there in rudder pedal pressure and the ball or
> string slip indicator when flying with no passenger?>>
Hi Richard.
not enough to notice. She will trim out to fly no hands for some minutes.
After that she can be kept reasonably straight with rudder only for a
while. Certainly long enough to sort out a map. Not perfect but as with so
many other things attaining that last few per cent is the difficult bit and
I for one won`t bother to refine things any further.
Cheers
Pat
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Kolb-List Digest: 6 Msgs - 11/28/11 |
My trim tab is not big enough, so I am pushing with the left foot no matter
what
I do. Winter project: new trim tab.
--------
Richard Pike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
i have mentioned this before so someone and they replied they would rather
have a trim tab,,,, but my mkiii has springs that pull the rudder pedals
forward,,, just put more tension or a bit heavier spring on the left
peddle. that way you don't have to install a tab, down side,,, when
parked the rudder will be slightly deflected when sitting on the ramp.
boyd
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Some success at last |
Hi Guys,
great suggestions about the Bungee to trim for a passenger, thanks!
Its fog time here in San Jose, but yesterday it cleared up in Hollister about
11.00AM and was calm and the airport was empty, so I went up for an hour. I
have two trim questions.
1/ I agree with John H about the prop wash on the tail for which I have to put
in Right rudder to compensate for. I topped up with a tad too much oil and the
left side of the rudder and top of the left HS was spattered. How big is your
trim tab , John? two rib bays long but how wide? 3 inches??
I think that will help eliminate yaw and right rudder input.
2/ I added an aerodynamic elevator trim tab and it works wonderfully. But I still
find that my M3X is unstable in pitch, ie, I cannot take my hands off the
stick for long as it will start to either dive or climb, depending on the
power setting and trim setting, and will not recover by itself. Is there a
way to set up the plane so that it will fly hands off? (in pitch)
Any suggestions are appreciated.
FrankD
PS, My engine is now running well, max CHTs around 310 Deg F, and oil temps
around 200, with EGT's below 1400.
Now I'm trying to get the radio noise eliminated!
M3 Xtra, Jabiru 2200,
8Hrs logged, Hollister Ca.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359723#359723
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Some success at last |
1/ I agree with John H about the prop wash on the tail for which I have to
put in Right rudder to compensate for. I topped up with a tad too much oil
and the left side of the rudder and top of the left HS was spattered. How
big is your trim tab , John? two rib bays long but how wide? 3 inches??
I think that will help eliminate yaw and right rudder input.
FrankD
Frank D/Kolbers:
Here are some pics with a spare rudder trim tab I made. Same, same what I
have on my MKIII, except I rounded the corners more than depicted on this
piece. This was also the first tab I tested, which covered 3 rib bays, and
moved adverse yaw the opposite direction in the same amount as it flew
without a trim tab. After I cut it one rib bay and to the dimensions
indicated below, it flew with the ball centered and feet off the rudder
pedals.
Dimensions are marked on the trim tab, but in case you cannot read them,
here they are:
Width: 14 3/4"
Length: 1 7/8" to the bend (35 degrees) with a 3 1/8 trailing edge.
Short side is riveted to the ribs with large flange aluminum fabric rivets.
I use aluminum rivets (hardware store quality) for anything that is not
structural because they are much easier to remove when it comes time to
change a component.
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Some success at last |
At 11:31 AM 11/29/2011, Frankd wrote:
>2/ I added an aerodynamic elevator trim tab and it works
>wonderfully. But I still find that my M3X is unstable in pitch, ie, I
>cannot take my hands off the stick for long as it will start to either
>dive or climb, depending on the power setting and trim setting, and will
>not recover by itself. Is there a way to set up the plane so that it will
>fly hands off? (in pitch)
Pitch stability is primarily a matter of CG. If the CG is aft, the
airplane will not be stable in pitch. Get too far aft of the neutral point
and the aircraft becomes violently unstable.
I took a different approach. When I bought my Ultrastar, letting go of the
stick meant a nose dive. I added elevator trim tabs to get the trim speed
to about 40mph (reasoning that it _might_ be survivable an elevator cable
or something broke). I also have a bungee to pull more nose down trim, up
to a cruise speed of approximately 55 mph.
-Dana
--
Shaw's principle: Build a machine that a fool can use, and only a fool
will want to use it.
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Firefly under 254 - How did you do it? |
Don G wrote:
> I believe a Fly could be built under 246 or 247 pretty easy tho...and with a
447....
Don,
Thanks for the reply! So you think pretty easy with a 447? How? Done per plans?
Tom
--------
Tom Stephens
www.planeaday.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=359784#359784
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|