Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:47 AM - Key West Regulator (George Bearden)
2. 02:03 AM - Re: Kolb-List Digest: 17 Msgs - 01/24/12 (GeoB)
3. 06:40 AM - Re: Re: FAA registration renewal (Vincent Nicely)
4. 10:38 AM - Re: Re: Kolb-List Digest: 17 Msgs - 01/24/12 (Richard Girard)
5. 11:23 AM - Re: FAA registration renewal (Richard Pike)
6. 11:44 AM - Re: Re: FAA registration renewal (Charlie England)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Key West Regulator |
> Another solution is to put a 50 volt 25,000 uf capacitor
<snip>
> Good thing the screwdriver handle was insulated it threw a big spark when
I accidentally grounded the screwdriver shaft.
You could install a high-value resistor across the cap leads. It will bleed
off the charge but not change the function.
GeoB
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Kolb-List Digest: 17 Msgs - 01/24/12 |
rickofudall, when you are capable of teaching me 'reading and comprehension' come
talk to me, Mr. Forum Monitor.
I guess I was expecting too much comprehension from you when I quoted the portion
of the message I was responding to; "Ground is ground is ground, to paraphrase
Gertrude Stein".
Also I was wrong to point out I was introducing a new topic, albeit clumsily, when
I said "This concept may have aircraft application but I run into it with
ground vehicles mostly". Please forgive me.
The fella touched on a peripheral topic of potential interest to technically minded
folks in a technical forum on a technical thread, and I wanted to clarify
what he said as it wasn't technically correct. What I said may help somebody
someday. But I was wrong and offensive to go there. I am so sorry.
I know it was terribly wrong for me to have posted that, but tell me... what forum
goal have you furthered by lashing out at me?
--------
GeoB
"Members of Congress should be compelled to wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers,
so we could identify their corporate sponsors"
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=364867#364867
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: FAA registration renewal |
Hi Fellow Kolbers,
I recently received the notice to renew my aircraft registration. I
chose to do it on-line and completed it in January rather than the last
possible month of June. I, like others, received a registration for 3
years from January, not June. The following is the reply from the FAA
and below it my question to them.
Vince Nicely
Greetings:
Aircraft are required to be re-registered by the end of the
re-registration period or they will expire and the airraft is not
eligible for operation. It is the descretion of the owner to turn in
the re-registration form. However, the Registry does not guarantee
the paperwork will be worked by the end of the re-registration
period. There is no penalty because you re-registered your aircraft on
time. Re-Registrations are valid for three years from the last day of
the month the aircraft was registered in.
Thank you.
LT
-----vincenic1@embarqmail.com wrote: -----
To: 9-AMC-AFS750-Aircraft/AMC/FAA@FAA
From: vincenic1@embarqmail.com
Date: 01/23/2012 04:31PM
Subject: N-Number Renewal - Problem
Subject: Problem
Name: Vincent Nicely
E-Mail Address: vincenic1@embarqmail.com
Phone: 423-288-4580
Application: N-Number Renewal
Comments: Expiration notice said N2811A registration expired June
30,2012. I renewed registration when I got the notice so as not to
forget. My new registration expires Jan 31, 2015 and not June 30,
2015 as I expected. I thought I renewed for three years from date
of expiration. Why should I get a penalty for renewing early??
Thanks for your reply.
Vince Nicely
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Kolb-List Digest: 17 Msgs - 01/24/12 |
There was no lashing out, just pointing out that you had not got the point
of the conversation.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:01 AM, GeoB <gab16@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> rickofudall, when you are capable of teaching me 'reading and
> comprehension' come talk to me, Mr. Forum Monitor.
>
> I guess I was expecting too much comprehension from you when I quoted the
> portion of the message I was responding to; "Ground is ground is ground, to
> paraphrase Gertrude Stein".
>
> Also I was wrong to point out I was introducing a new topic, albeit
> clumsily, when I said "This concept may have aircraft application but I run
> into it with ground vehicles mostly". Please forgive me.
>
> The fella touched on a peripheral topic of potential interest to
> technically minded folks in a technical forum on a technical thread, and I
> wanted to clarify what he said as it wasn't technically correct. What I
> said may help somebody someday. But I was wrong and offensive to go there.
> I am so sorry.
>
> I know it was terribly wrong for me to have posted that, but tell me...
> what forum goal have you furthered by lashing out at me?
>
> --------
> GeoB
>
> "Members of Congress should be compelled to wear uniforms like NASCAR
> drivers, so we could identify their corporate sponsors"
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=364867#364867
>
>
--
Zulu Delta
Mk IIIC
Thanks, Homer GBYM
It isn't necessary to have relatives in Kansas City in order to be unhappy.
- Groucho Marx
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: FAA registration renewal |
What we need to find out is "How do I renew? Not re-register, but renew?"
Their web page - http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/aircraft_certification/aircraft_registry/reregistration/ - half way down says "Aircraft registration issued under re-registration expires three years after the last day of the month in which it is issued.
Aircraft registration issued due to renewal expires three years from the expiration
date of the previous certificate."
But there is no option to renew, only to re-register, and they are treating everything
as a re-registration. So how do we renew and get three years from the
expiry date of the current registration?
Obviously you can send it in to get there at the first of the month that the current
registration expires, and according to the bureaucrats, maybe not have it
meet the cutoff date, but it ticks me off that yet another branch of the government
is playing games to jerk us around.
--------
Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
richard (at) bcchapel(dot)org
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Hebrews 11:1
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=364892#364892
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: FAA registration renewal |
On 01/26/2012 01:21 PM, Richard Pike wrote:
> --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Richard Pike"<richard@bcchapel.org>
>
> What we need to find out is "How do I renew? Not re-register, but renew?"
> Their web page - http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/aircraft_certification/aircraft_registry/reregistration/ - half way down says "Aircraft registration issued under re-registration expires three years after the last day of the month in which it is issued.
>
> Aircraft registration issued due to renewal expires three years from the expiration
date of the previous certificate."
>
> But there is no option to renew, only to re-register, and they are treating everything
as a re-registration. So how do we renew and get three years from the
expiry date of the current registration?
>
> Obviously you can send it in to get there at the first of the month that the
current registration expires, and according to the bureaucrats, maybe not have
it meet the cutoff date, but it ticks me off that yet another branch of the government
is playing games to jerk us around.
>
> --------
> Richard Pike
> Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
> richard (at) bcchapel(dot)org
> Kingsport, TN 3TN0
> Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
> Hebrews 11:1
>
>
Remember the old saw, "Never assume a conspiracy when incompetence will do".
Odds are high that there just wasn't a committee formed to address that
little detail.
Charlie
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|