Kolb-List Digest Archive

Thu 08/28/14


Total Messages Posted: 7



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:07 PM - pumps (Pat Ladd)
     2. 01:42 PM - pitch? (Stuart Harner)
     3. 02:04 PM - Re: pitch? (John Hauck)
     4. 03:03 PM - Re: pitch? (Beauford)
     5. 05:03 PM - Re: pitch? (t41pilot)
     6. 06:49 PM - Re: pitch? (Richard Pike)
     7. 07:05 PM - Re: Re: pitch? (John Hauck)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:07:49 PM PST US
    From: "Pat Ladd" <pj.ladd@btinternet.com>
    Subject: pumps
    Hi, My ex flying partner still flies a Eurostar, the same type we shared but not the same machine. He is a good pilot and meticulous about maintenance. I forwarded our recent posts about pumps to him and this is his reply. For what its worth. On another tack John flew me to a local airshow last weekend where we had a flyover of the only two Lancasters still flying.The Canadian one is over her for a month. A once in a lifetime experience Cheers Pat Pat, Don't know whether you are inclined to forward this to your Kolb list? As you may know, mine - a 4 year old example - was one of the series of Rotax 912s recommended for a change of fuel pump. Apparently, several of the previous type had failed in service. A replacement was provided free by the then UK Rotax agent and it certainly looked a better-engineered piece of work than its predecessor. That said, the previous one had given me no trouble over 4 years and 300 hours. Nor had the one on a previous Rotax-powered aircraft I had owned over 6 years and 650 hours. Experience with the new pump belied appearance. I try to stay safe by being attentive to anything about the aircraft which changes - sight, sound or feel - and investigating. The new fuel pump showed big and seemingly random variations in pressure, between 0.2 and 0.4 bar. (The previous pump had given virtually constant readings under all conditions.) It therefore didn't feel "safe". Matters came to a head when flying over one of the more inhospitable areas of the UK, when the pressure dropped off from its "norm" at just over 0.3 bar to 0.2 bar before recovering several sweaty minutes later. I raised this with the Rotax agent and with our Light Aircraft Association. The answer was that nothing could be done about it. The new pumps did give variations in pressure and my results were within the specified range. I subsequently borrowed a new-type pump from elsewhere and this gave better results, although still subject to some variation. I have since returned that to its rightful owners and purchased a further new pump. This also gives better results, but still subject to some variation. I may be deluding myself but I think the variability may be diminishing with time. It appears, from talking to others, that the new type fuel pump is just not engineered to very tight tolerances: strange given the strong engineering tradition of where in Europe I assume it comes from. Not being an engineer or an expert, I cannot advise on what your colleague Dennis Kirby should do! I just add my tale to the request for thoughts. Regards, John


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:42:30 PM PST US
    From: "Stuart Harner" <stuart@harnerfarm.net>
    Subject: pitch?
    Hi, My Warp Drive prop (3 blade- 60") arrived yesterday and I am getting ready to set it up. It is going on my Firefly with a Rotax 447 (single carb),B-Gearbox with 2.58 ratio. Is anyone running this same setup? What amount of pitch do you think I should start with? Do I shoot for 6500 or 6800 RPM static? Just waiting for muffler mount and engine instruments so I can do the final assembly. Getting anxious! Thanks in advance, Stuart


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:04:45 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: pitch?
    If I was flying it, I would prop it to bump 6,500 rpm, wide open throttle, straight and level flight. Without looking for the book, I think the 447 is rated at 6,500 rpm max continuous. 6,800 rpm is like military power, can only be run at that speed for 5 minutes max. If you had an in flight adjustable prop you could pitch to turn 6,800 rpm, but a ground adjustable prop works best propped as described above. I don't know what static rpm would be, probably 6,300. Been too many years since I had a 447 on my FS. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Harner Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:41 PM Subject: Kolb-List: pitch? Hi, My Warp Drive prop (3 blade- 60") arrived yesterday and I am getting ready to set it up. It is going on my Firefly with a Rotax 447 (single carb),B-Gearbox with 2.58 ratio. Is anyone running this same setup? What amount of pitch do you think I should start with? Do I shoot for 6500 or 6800 RPM static? Just waiting for muffler mount and engine instruments so I can do the final assembly. Getting anxious! Thanks in advance, Stuart


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:03:44 PM PST US
    From: "Beauford " <beauford173@tampabay.rr.com>
    Subject: pitch?
    Brother Harner: Cannot speak directly to the Warp. Mine has a 66 inch IVO. But load is load. That said, I would suspect that anything over 6100 or 6150 static might be a tad skinny on loading. When I set 6150 static WOT, I get easy 6600 in level flight WOT. Personally fer me, that is about enough. 6800 static would be like an argument with my first wife. makes my few remaining teeth hurt. (how mad are you at your bearings.?) Worth What Ye Paid Fer It. beauford FF-076 Brandon, FL From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Harner Subject: Kolb-List: pitch? What amount of pitch do you think I should start with? Do I shoot for 6500 or 6800 RPM static? Stuart


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:03:25 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: pitch?
    From: "t41pilot" <t41pilot@frontier.com>
    I'm running a 447 on my firefly with a 60 inch IVO prop. 6500 WOT is by the book and typically 200 RPM less static on the ground would yield whatever WOT setting you are looking for. That being said, I have found from a lot of reading on the subject that not all 447's are going to run identically. You should dial in your prop to whatever setting makes your CHT and EGT fall within the normal operating range during flight conditions. On my particular engine that ended up being 6000 static and 6300 WOT. It took a few flights to get that figured out. Definitely 6800 WOT is too much. I would start at 61 or 62 static and see how she goes. Add more pitch if the EGT is too high. Fiddling with carb jets to get the temps right can lead to a vicious circle of prop pitch changes and wrong conclusions. I did end up with my clip set rich and one size larger on my main jet but in most cases the stock size jets should work. -------- Gregg Kaat 2011 Firefly Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429555#429555


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:49:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: pitch?
    From: "Richard Pike" <richard@bcchapel.org>
    What John & the others said. Let me add a few remarks from my own experience: leave the jets alone and fine tune the EGT with prop pitch. When the pitch is ideal, your EGT's will stay roughly between 1050 & 1150 at any typical in-flight throttle setting except WOT, where they will be 1000-1050. As the EGT rises and falls from summer to winter, once again, leave the jets alone and add or remove pitch. I marked this on my Ivo hub abut 3 years ago, so the arrows are a bit faded, but coarse is one way, fine is the other. Takes less than 2 minutes, usually a half a turn is enough. -------- Richard Pike Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops) Kingsport, TN 3TN0 My soul shall be joyful in the LORD; It shall rejoice in His salvation. Psalm 35:9 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=429559#429559 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1030840_small_127.jpg


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:05:35 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: pitch?
    If I remember correctly, ROTAX sets up their two strokes, before they leave the factory, for operation from sea level to 3000 feet on a 70F day. It has the correct heat range spark plugs and is jetted correctly. It will run perfect right out of the box. It is up to the operator to load the prop correctly. Do it by pitch adjustment and leave the engine alone. My experience with two stroke aircraft engines, which are continuous duty engines, is WOT, straight and level flight, just bump the red line, 6500 rpm. I discovered if I set up the engine this way, my EGTs would be right in the green. Loading and unloading the prop by changing pitch attitude also affects EGTs, but temporarily. EGTs can be controlled with throttle settings. This info is nothing new. We have been doing it this way since 1984, and others long before me. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama What John & the others said. Let me add a few remarks from my own experience: leave the jets alone and fine tune the EGT with prop pitch. When the pitch is ideal, your EGT's will stay roughly between 1050 & 1150 at any typical in-flight throttle setting except WOT, where they will be 1000-1050. As the EGT rises and falls from summer to winter, once again, leave the jets alone and add or remove pitch. I marked this on my Ivo hub abut 3 years ago, so the arrows are a bit faded, but coarse is one way, fine is the other. Takes less than 2 minutes, usually a half a turn is enough. -------- Richard Pike




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --