Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:23 AM - Trimming messages (JC Gilpin)
2. 04:59 AM - Re: Bourke engine gibberish (Michael Velemirov)
3. 05:49 AM - Re: Re: Bourke engine gibberish (william sullivan)
4. 06:46 AM - Re: Re: Bourke engine gibberish (undoctor)
5. 07:04 AM - Re: Re: Bourke engine gibberish (Herb)
6. 07:30 AM - Re: Wankel (woody)
7. 08:15 AM - Re: Re: Wankel (Charlie England)
8. 08:22 AM - Re: Re: Bourke engine gibberish (Charlie England)
9. 10:31 AM - Re: Re: Bourke engine gibberish (william sullivan)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Trimming messages |
Sure would be good if everyone trimmed the history of old messages from
their postings.....
Just leave enough to remind us what the post is replying to.
JG
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: Bourke engine gibberish |
I=99m getting gibberish also. I=99m using windows 7 and
Windows live email
Michael Velemirov
Twinstar Mk II
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RE: Bourke engine gibberish |
I only get gibberish when people say, "this is what it looks like:" and post
it. Windows 7, Home Edition, Firefox, and Yahoo Mail.
do not archive
Bill Sullivan
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 1/29/15, Michael Velemirov <mvelemirov@neo.rr.com> wrote:
Subject: Kolb-List: RE: Bourke engine gibberish
To: "Kolb-List Digest Server" <kolb-list@matronics.com>
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2015, 7:59 AM
Im getting gibberish also. Im
using windows 7 and Windows
live email
Michael Velemirov
Twinstar Mk II
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: Bourke engine gibberish |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Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: RE: Bourke engine gibberish |
Nothing wrong with Winders or crab apple....but I divorced them both for
Linux Mint . Works very well..
I run firefox web browser and Thunderbird mail... Herb
On 01/29/2015 07:49 AM, william sullivan wrote:
>
> I only get gibberish when people say, "this is what it looks like:" and post
it. Windows 7, Home Edition, Firefox, and Yahoo Mail.
>
> do not archive
>
> Bill Sullivan
> --------------------------------------------
> On Thu, 1/29/15, Michael Velemirov <mvelemirov@neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: Kolb-List: RE: Bourke engine gibberish
> To: "Kolb-List Digest Server" <kolb-list@matronics.com>
> Date: Thursday, January 29, 2015, 7:59 AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Im getting gibberish also. Im
> using windows 7 and Windows
> live email
> Michael Velemirov
> Twinstar Mk II
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I believe that Mazda still puts a Wankel rotary engine in their RX-8.
A car that will outrun anything in it's class including the Porches.
I've watched this firsthand at Barbers road course in Leeds, AL.
The engine, with two turbochargers, puts out tremendous HP & torque.
Nobody can stay with them, coming out of the tight turns or on the long straights.
I imagine these engines to be expensive to buy & feed as 2 stroke engines
are notorious gas guzzlers.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=437818#437818
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
On 1/29/2015 9:30 AM, woody wrote:
>
> I believe that Mazda still puts a Wankel rotary engine in their RX-8.
> A car that will outrun anything in it's class including the Porches.
> I've watched this firsthand at Barbers road course in Leeds, AL.
> The engine, with two turbochargers, puts out tremendous HP & torque.
> Nobody can stay with them, coming out of the tight turns or on the long straights.
> I imagine these engines to be expensive to buy & feed as 2 stroke engines
> are notorious gas guzzlers.
>
>
Yes, very light and quick, and not, not, and not.
The twin turbo was the last generation RX7; the RX8 (Renesis powered)
was normally aspirated (no turbo option). Unfortunately, the RX8 is no
longer produced, and Mazda is not currently selling rotary powered cars,
to my knowledge (definitely not in the USA). I previously sent links to
two potential new rotary products from Mazda, a small (~300cc)
'sustainer' engine for a hybrid car (should be just about perfect for a
Kolb), and the 16B, a larger displacement (1600cc), all aluminum rotary
intended for a new sports car. The latter has us aviating rotor heads
salivating. It will likely be around 250-275 HP normally aspirated, and
the core engine will weigh around 120-130 lbs (the Renesis core weighs
around 190 lbs & produces around 200 HP). Remember, those weights are
for bare engines; what a V-8 builder would call a 'long block'. All up
for flight, with radiator, oil cooler, etc, a Renesis weighs around
330-340 lbs. The weight & HP numbers for the Renesis are 'real world',
proven-in-a/c numbers, not marketing hype from someone trying to sell
you worthless stock options.
The engines are relatively inexpensive from salvage yards; typically a
few hundred dollars for the old 13B engines and from a few hundred to
under a couple thousand for Renesis engines in near new condition. Fuel
economy is slightly worse (~10%) than piston engines, but the normally
aspirated engines prefer the lowest octane fuel you can find. And they
are --not-repeat-not-- 2 stroke engines. They go through a normal 4
stroke power cycle just like a piston engine; but do all 4 strokes in
one rev of the rotor. Engineers often call them 'rotary combustion'
engines, since the combustion process travels around the engine as it
occurs.
I wouldn't claim to be an authority, but I am familiar with them; I've
owned two RX-7's, I'm installing a Renesis in an RV-7 & I have a lot of
friends already flying rotaries. If anyone wants more info, just let me
know.
Thanks,
Charlie
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: Bourke engine gibberish |
Hi Dave,
This reply is from my Samsung Galaxy S4 (android) using the K9 email app. Can everyone
read it?
On January 29, 2015 8:46:02 AM CST, undoctor <undoctor@ptd.net> wrote:
>Hi Michael,
>From the info I've read I've come to the conclusion it's a result of
>using my Android somewhat smart phone to post rather than my PC. That
>being the case I'll try to use my PC.
>
>Starting tomorrow...
>
>Dave Kulp
>Bethlehem, PA
>
>Do not archive
>
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
>
><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Michael
>Velemirov <mvelemirov@neo.rr.com> </div><div>Date:01/29/2015 7:59 AM
>(GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Kolb-List Digest Server
><kolb-list@matronics.com> </div><div>Subject: Kolb-List: RE: Bourke
>engine gibberish </div><div>
></div>Im getting gibberish also. Im using windows 7 and Windows live
>email
>Michael Velemirov
>Twinstar Mk II
>
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | RE: Bourke engine gibberish |
Yes- all in the clear, no code.
do not archive.
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 1/29/15, Charlie England <ceengland7@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: RE: Kolb-List: RE: Bourke engine gibberish
To: kolb-list@matronics.com
Date: Thursday, January 29, 2015, 11:21 AM
Hi Dave,
This reply is from my Samsung Galaxy S4 (android) using the
K9 email app. Can everyone read it?
On January 29, 2015
8:46:02 AM CST, undoctor <undoctor@ptd.net>
wrote:
Hi Michael,From the info I've read
I've come to the conclusion it's a result of using
my Android somewhat smart phone to post rather than my PC.
That being the case I'll try to use my
PC.
Starting tomorrow...
Dave KulpBethlehem, PA
Do not archive
Sent
from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------From:
Michael Velemirov Date:01/29/2015 7:59 AM
(GMT-05:00) To: Kolb-List Digest Server
Subject: Kolb-List: RE: Bourke engine gibberish
Im getting gibberish also. Im
using windows 7 and Windows
live email
Michael Velemirov
Twinstar Mk II
~,
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my
brevity.
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|