Kolb-List Digest Archive

Sun 02/25/18


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:59 PM - Re: Replacement tail rod...? (Jack Hart)
     2. 04:25 PM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (John Hauck)
     3. 09:11 PM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (Jack Hart)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:43 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Replacement tail rod...?
    John, I don't understand your statement. The cables are designed to help in the case of a "plop" and do nothing to prevent the gear from flexing or bending front to back and/or inward. If you drop a wheel into a hole, the leg will bend just as it would before the cable system was installed and protects the fuselage from being damaged. If I recall correctly, the whole works weighed a few ounces. I put up the previous jump to show that no modifications need to be made to the existing structures and that cables could be used to keep the gear from spreading. $20 spent and the time required to fabricate parts seemed like a good trade off in comparison to straightening and/or purchasing and installing new legs. http://www.jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly134.html In case you missed it, I put up the above jump so that you can view the analysis that was done to determine if adding cables would be beneficial. These calculations indicated the original leg would start to bend at 1.8 G in a level straight two wheel plop. With the cable system in place and assuming a plop hard enough to cause cable failure, the cable and gear leg system will withstand a 5.2 G plop. Jack B. Hart, FF004 Winchester, IN ---------------------------------------- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:18 PM To: kolb-list@matronics.com Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? Jack H's cables will probably prevent spreading the main gear, but effectively kill the suspension.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:25:51 PM PST US
    From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Replacement tail rod...?
    Jack H/Kolbers: By adding cables and restricting outward flex of the gear legs, your modification effectively kills the spring in the direction it is needed most, outward. To me, what you have done is change flexible gear to rigid gear. I went to 1 1/8" 7075 after my initial taxi when I bent the 1" 7075 legs before I got a chance to fly. 1 1/8" didn't hack it either, which proved to me that 7075 rod didn't make good spring gear. Heat treated 4130 has proven much better, although I can bend them too when I try. Spring gear is much easier on the aircraft than rigid. >From the photo of your airplane, it is obvious you landed on the right gear, putting all the load on one leg. I do that too, but on the left leg. john h mkIII Titus, Alabama From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Hart Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:59 PM Subject: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? John, I don't understand your statement. The cables are designed to help in the case of a "plop" and do nothing to prevent the gear from flexing or bending front to back and/or inward. If you drop a wheel into a hole, the leg will bend just as it would before the cable system was installed and protects the fuselage from being damaged. If I recall correctly, the whole works weighed a few ounces. I put up the previous jump to show that no modifications need to be made to the existing structures and that cables could be used to keep the gear from spreading. $20 spent and the time required to fabricate parts seemed like a good trade off in comparison to straightening and/or purchasing and installing new legs. http://www.jackbhart.com/firefly/firefly134.html In case you missed it, I put up the above jump so that you can view the analysis that was done to determine if adding cables would be beneficial. These calculations indicated the original leg would start to bend at 1.8 G in a level straight two wheel plop. With the cable system in place and assuming a plop hard enough to cause cable failure, the cable and gear leg system will withstand a 5.2 G plop. Jack B. Hart, FF004 Winchester, IN ---------------------------------------- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 12:18 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? Jack H's cables will probably prevent spreading the main gear, but effectively kill the suspension.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:31 PM PST US
    From: "Jack Hart" <jbhart@onlyinternet.net>
    Subject: Re: Replacement tail rod...?
    John, I believe you have it right. The FireFly gear is rigid by design and the aluminum leg bends so easily. If you apply a 330 pound load in any direction at the axle, the leg will bend at just below the fuselage socket. By adding the cable I have, indeed, reduced one degree of flexsure and gained some freedom from plops. As for the photo, it is difficult to tell if it was or was not a level plop. At the time it felt like it was. Both legs had to be straightened. It could be that the right tire broke loose from the asphalt first. Jack B Hart FF004 Winchester, IN ---------------------------------------- From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 7:28 PM Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? Jack H/Kolbers: By adding cables and restricting outward flex of the gear legs, your modification effectively kills the spring in the direction it is needed most, outward. To me, what you have done is change flexible gear to rigid gear. Spring gear is much easier on the aircraft than rigid. >From the photo of your airplane, it is obvious you landed on the right gear, putting all the load on one leg. I do that too, but on the left leg.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   kolb-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Kolb-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/kolb-list
  • Browse Kolb-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/kolb-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --