Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:03 AM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (John Hauck)
     2. 07:30 AM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (Jack Hart)
     3. 08:31 AM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (John Hauck)
     4. 09:13 AM - Re: Re: Replacement tail rod...? (Bill Berle)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Replacement tail rod...? | 
      
      To the best of my knowledge, the only aircraft Homer Kolb designed with
      rigid gear was the Flyer and the Ultrastar.
      
      
      The Firestar was the first to have flexible main gear legs.  The gear legs
      were designed to be flexible, to give the aircraft landing gear some spring
      suspension to take landing and ground handling loads off the airframe.
      
      
      All Kolb aircraft models from the Firestar on are designed with spring
      landing gear legs, flexible, not rigid.
      
      
      The rigid gear on my Ultrastar was not forgiving in the least.  On my first
      landing in my unimproved cow pasture airstrip, my roll out took me across a
      cow path (rut) that took out the main gear, my prop, and the little turned
      up nose skid of the airframe.
      
      
      Del Cross, who flew a Kolb Flyer at Sun and Fun and Lakeland, upgraded his
      rigid main gear to 7075 aluminum rod, making them longer to get the nose of
      the Flyer out of its normal level attitude on the ground.  Del was killed
      when his Flyer crashed some years ago.  RIP.
      
      
      john h
      
      mkIII
      
      Titus, Alabama
      
      
      From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Hart
      Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 11:11 PM
      Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...?
      
      
      John,
      
      
      I believe you have it right.  The FireFly gear is rigid by design and the
      aluminum leg bends so easily.  If you  apply a 330 pound load in any
      direction at the axle, the leg will bend at just below the fuselage socket.
      By adding the cable I have, indeed, reduced one degree of flexsure and
      gained some freedom from plops.
      
      
      As for the photo, it is difficult to tell if it was or was not a level plop.
      At the time it felt like it was.  Both legs had to be straightened.  It
      could be that the right tire broke loose from the asphalt first.
      
      
      Jack B Hart FF004
      
      Winchester, IN
      
        _____  
      
      From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
      Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 7:28 PM
      Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? 
      
      
      Jack H/Kolbers:
      
      
      By adding cables and restricting outward flex of the gear legs, your
      modification effectively kills the spring in the direction it is needed
      most, outward.  To me, what you have done is change flexible gear to rigid
      gear.
      
      
      Spring gear is much easier on the aircraft than rigid. 
      
      
      >From the photo of your airplane, it is obvious you landed on the right gear,
      putting all the load on one leg.  I do that too, but on the left leg. 
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Replacement tail rod...? | 
      
      John,
      
       If the below is so, why is it that the FireFly legs bend in a 1.8 G plop?
      
       Jack B. Hart FF004
       Winchester,  IN
      
      
      ----------------------------------------
       From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
      Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 9:06 AM
      Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...?   
         
      
      All Kolb aircraft models from the Firestar on are designed with spring 
      landing gear legs, flexible, not rigid.  
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Replacement tail rod...? | 
      
      Springs are flexible to a point.  When overstressed they bend or break.
      That's how my springs work.  Isn't that how your springs work?
      
      
      Didn't your gear legs flex to the point you over stressed and bent them?
      
      
      I've flown with a G Meter since my Firestar days.  If you sneeze while
      taxiing, you'll get 2 or 3 Gs very easily. 
      
      
      Jack H is wearing me out.  I quit.  ;-)
      
      
      john h
      
      mkIII
      
      Titus, Alabama 
      
      
      From: owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-kolb-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jack Hart
      Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 9:30 AM
      Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...?
      
      
      John,
      
      
      If the below is so, why is it that the FireFly legs bend in a 1.8 G plop?
      
      
      Jack B. Hart FF004
      
      Winchester,  IN
      
      
        _____  
      
      From: "John Hauck" <jhauck@elmore.rr.com>
      Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 9:06 AM
      Subject: RE: Kolb-List: Re: Replacement tail rod...? 
      
      
      All Kolb aircraft models from the Firestar on are designed with spring
      landing gear legs, flexible, not rigid.
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: Replacement tail rod...? | 
      
      
      After having made numerous landing gears out of fiberglass, carbon fiber, etc....
      the world's largest manufacturer of landing gears for light aircraft (Grove)
      uses 7075-T6 exclusively. Using a direct comparison between MATERIAL PROPERTIES,
      the 7075 has better stress/strain/yield/weight and all that high brain function
      engineering stuff I don't understand.
      
      But when you put a FIXED CROSS SECTION into the mix, things change. For a given
      size, thickness, or diameter, then steel starts to show its advantages.
      
      A few years ago I took over the FAA "STC" approval for changing the tricycle gear
      Cessna 172 back into a tailwheel configuration (like the Cessna 170). As part
      of that process, I learned a whole lot about this stuff, thanks to an old gray
      engineer who was kind enough to put up with my lack of a formal engineering
      education.
      
      We wanted to replace the steel Cessna main gear legs with aluminum, because the
      exact steel alloy that Cessna used was a special order from a steel mill. So
      my engineer did a bunch of calculations, and he figured out that to replace a
      13/16" thick spring steel main gear, we needed a 1.25" thick piece of 7075-T6
      aluminum... to get the same spring properties, energy absorbtion, and impact capability.
      
      How is this relevant to a discussion about Kolb landing gears? Because on a Kolb
      aircraft the size of the main gear is always limited to the size of the round
      socket tube that Kolb builds in to the fuselages. With a given size fuselage
      socket tube, if you want or need a "stronger" main gear than the original 7075
      Kolb gear leg, you have no choice but to change materials and use steel. (even
      carbon fiber wouldn't help you because you would need a 2 inch socket tube
      to make the gear out of carbon.)
      
      So John H made the only upgrade that was legitimately possible, by moving from
      aluminum to steel. Kolb figured this out at some point when they wanted to build
      heavier two seat airplanes,a nd they went to hardened steel as well. 
      
      For the people who are obsessed with weight, or who are on a quest to meet Part
      103 weight, then aluminum or carbon is worth pursuing, but to really be able
      to use those materials you would need to increase the diameter of the socket tube
      in the fuselage. That would be quite a project !
      
      
      Bill Berle
      www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft
      www.grantstar.net      - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |