L29-List Digest Archive

Mon 08/21/06


Total Messages Posted: 26



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:41 PM - Air Conditioner (Ernest Martinez)
     2. 03:43 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Bill)
     3. 04:38 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Ernest Martinez)
     4. 05:02 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (RAMPEYBOY@aol.com)
     5. 05:22 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Ernest Martinez)
     6. 06:04 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (RAMPEYBOY@aol.com)
     7. 06:21 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (RAMPEYBOY@aol.com)
     8. 06:45 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Brian Colombo)
     9. 07:15 PM - Re: Air Conditioner (kelseyjewett)
    10. 07:22 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (ROBERT SCHWARTZ)
    11. 07:29 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Bill)
    12. 09:02 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (SD737@aol.com)
    13. 09:04 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (SD737@aol.com)
    14. 09:11 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (Brian Colombo)
    15. 09:16 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (SD737@aol.com)
    16. 09:24 PM - M701 Thrust (SD737@aol.com)
    17. 09:35 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (colyergreg@aol.com)
    18. 09:37 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (colyergreg@aol.com)
    19. 09:37 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (colyergreg@aol.com)
    20. 09:39 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (SD737@aol.com)
    21. 09:40 PM - Re: [SPAM] Air Conditioner (SD737@aol.com)
    22. 09:41 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (colyergreg@aol.com)
    23. 09:46 PM - Re:nose gear problem (colyergreg@aol.com)
    24. 09:57 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (David M.)
    25. 10:10 PM - Re: Re:nose gear problem (colyergreg@aol.com)
    26. 10:28 PM - Re: M701 Thrust (Jean de Roubin)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:41:18 PM PST US
    From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com>
    Subject: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Well whats the deal with the airconditioner??? I responded offline as requested and also posted here for info, with no response. While I'm on the subject. I've come up with another idea for AC. While I was at SAM's club the other day, I noticed this little bitty 5200 BTU window unit which only draws 4.5 amps and weighs around 45 lbs. The unit is assembled in 2 halves and looks like the compressor/condensor unit is in the rear half, and the evaporator in the front. Most window units have 2 fans, one for the evaporator and one for the condensor. It sounds feasible that the compressor/condensor section could be mounted in the radio bay in the nose, and the refrigerant lines could be led through the bulkhead to the evaporator unit in the cockpit. The unit costs $90, a 24v to 110V 900 watt inverter is another $100. You would just need to install a couple of relays so you can remotely control power to the inverter and to the evaporator fan in the cockpit (you would need to run 110vac through the bulkhead into the cokpit to power the evaporator fan). Total cost of parts would be under $500. Since the recent post was for a 5200 btu AC unit and mentioned inverters, sounds to me like someone came up with this idea already. Ernie


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:43:46 PM PST US
    From: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net> It turned into "Big Business". He has a manager handling the sales and tech support. So as is the case with any "Big Business", red tape and lots of middle men. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:41 PM Subject: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > > Well whats the deal with the airconditioner??? I responded offline as > requested and also posted here for info, with no response. > > While I'm on the subject. I've come up with another idea for AC. While > I was at SAM's club the other day, I noticed this little bitty 5200 > BTU window unit which only draws 4.5 amps and weighs around 45 lbs. > The unit is assembled in 2 halves and looks like the > compressor/condensor unit is in the rear half, and the evaporator in > the front. Most window units have 2 fans, one for the evaporator and > one for the condensor. It sounds feasible that the > compressor/condensor section could be mounted in the radio bay in the > nose, and the refrigerant lines could be led through the bulkhead to > the evaporator unit in the cockpit. The unit costs $90, a 24v to 110V > 900 watt inverter is another $100. You would just need to install a > couple of relays so you can remotely control power to the inverter and > to the evaporator fan in the cockpit (you would need to run 110vac > through the bulkhead into the cokpit to power the evaporator fan). > Total cost of parts would be under $500. > > Since the recent post was for a 5200 btu AC unit and mentioned > inverters, sounds to me like someone came up with this idea already. > > Ernie > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:38:19 PM PST US
    From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Did you get more details??? Did I divulge trade secrets? :) Ernie Hey, I may fly out to Colorado Springs in Oct for the Bonanza Convention, maybe we could hook up then. Ernie On 8/21/06, Bill <czech6@kellin.net> wrote: > --> L29-List message posted by: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net> > > It turned into "Big Business". He has a manager handling the sales and tech > support. So as is the case with any "Big Business", red tape and lots of > middle men. > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > To: <l29-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:41 PM > Subject: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > > > > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > > > > Well whats the deal with the airconditioner??? I responded offline as > > requested and also posted here for info, with no response. > > > > While I'm on the subject. I've come up with another idea for AC. While > > I was at SAM's club the other day, I noticed this little bitty 5200 > > BTU window unit which only draws 4.5 amps and weighs around 45 lbs. > > The unit is assembled in 2 halves and looks like the > > compressor/condensor unit is in the rear half, and the evaporator in > > the front. Most window units have 2 fans, one for the evaporator and > > one for the condensor. It sounds feasible that the > > compressor/condensor section could be mounted in the radio bay in the > > nose, and the refrigerant lines could be led through the bulkhead to > > the evaporator unit in the cockpit. The unit costs $90, a 24v to 110V > > 900 watt inverter is another $100. You would just need to install a > > couple of relays so you can remotely control power to the inverter and > > to the evaporator fan in the cockpit (you would need to run 110vac > > through the bulkhead into the cokpit to power the evaporator fan). > > Total cost of parts would be under $500. > > > > Since the recent post was for a 5200 btu AC unit and mentioned > > inverters, sounds to me like someone came up with this idea already. > > > > Ernie > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:10 PM PST US
    From: RAMPEYBOY@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    I mentioned the same possibility of using this window unit in my Mustang II experimental. I'm no electrical engineer so don't quote me on this as I probably have it all backwards, but something about the amps that unit pulls is at the AC 110volt setting. It would supposedly pull more like 60 amps DC? Your L-29's may easily handle this, but that's pushing most DC alternators... Boyce


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:03 PM PST US
    From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Not at all. You need to just use OHM's law and convert to power, 4.5 amps @ 110v = 495 watts, P=E x I ...conversly I = P/E so 495 watts divided by 24v = 20 amps at 24V. For startup current just double that value and that ups the startup current requirement to 40 amps, add 10% for Inverter inefficiency and you're in the neighborhood of 50 amps for startup, and about 25 amps while running. The inverter I saw for $100 was rated at 900 watts continuous with 1800 watts peak, more than enough for this application. I've never seen these tiny window units before, thats why I never considered using window units, but the weight and current draw of these little babies makes them viable. Also remember that the alternator need not be able to keep up with the momentary startup current requirements, since the battery will act as you current storage tank, the alternator just replenishes the current during continuous use. Even a 30 amp alternator would be able to supply 5 amps of charging current during continuous AC use, but I wouldnt recommend doing this with anything under a 50 amp alternator. Ernie On 8/21/06, RAMPEYBOY@aol.com <RAMPEYBOY@aol.com> wrote: > > I mentioned the same possibility of using this window unit in my Mustang > II experimental. I'm no electrical engineer so don't quote me on this as I > probably have it all backwards, but something about the amps that unit pulls > is at the AC 110volt setting. It would supposedly pull more like 60 amps DC? > Your L-29's may easily handle this, but that's pushing most DC > alternators... > Boyce > > - The L29-List Email Forum - > to browse > Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, > much more: > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List > - NEW MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - > the Web Forums! > http://forums.matronics.com > - NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI - > Wiki! > http://wiki.matronics.com > - List Contribution Web Site - > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:04:28 PM PST US
    From: RAMPEYBOY@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    Ernie, I recently bought one of these units when my heat pump at home failed. If memory serves the box advertised it weighed 40 pounds. It may come in at less than that once you strip it of it's current chassis, and reconfigure to fit into the L-29. All food for thought huh?


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:45 PM PST US
    From: RAMPEYBOY@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    Reviewing some of the conversations we had on the Mustang site on this topic, another consideration that was brought up a couple times is possible interference between an inverter and the avionics....On a positive note, it could be run on the ground from a normal 110 plug in. Get the plane cooled down without draining the battery!


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:45:28 PM PST US
    From: "Brian Colombo" <Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Brian Colombo" <Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com> I think the inverter numbers are a bit off. here is the formula for power invertes. This is for a 24v to 110/120 inverter Here's the formula for all power inverter: Amps (needed) x (volts)110 V AC wattage of inverter needed 50amps needed for start X 110v =5500 watt inverter. I have a 1000 watt inverter and it does not run much let alone a small AC unit. The inverter needs a lot of air(on the ground is the only time this would be an issue) or it will overheat and trip fast. sure would be nice to have it though. I would also go as far as to put a small boat type halon system in the nose if that was the place I vould run have the compressor. Again big heat producer and they are not ment for closed spaces. just my 2 cents. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:21 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > > Not at all. You need to just use OHM's law and convert to power, 4.5 > amps @ 110v = 495 watts, P=E x I ...conversly I = P/E so 495 watts > divided by 24v = 20 amps at 24V. For startup current just double that > value and that ups the startup current requirement to 40 amps, add 10% > for Inverter inefficiency and you're in the neighborhood of 50 amps > for startup, and about 25 amps while running. The inverter I saw for > $100 was rated at 900 watts continuous with 1800 watts peak, more than > enough for this application. I've never seen these tiny window units > before, thats why I never considered using window units, but the > weight and current draw of these little babies makes them viable. > > Also remember that the alternator need not be able to keep up with the > momentary startup current requirements, since the battery will act as > you current storage tank, the alternator just replenishes the current > during continuous use. Even a 30 amp alternator would be able to > supply 5 amps of charging current during continuous AC use, but I > wouldnt recommend doing this with anything under a 50 amp alternator. > > Ernie > > On 8/21/06, RAMPEYBOY@aol.com <RAMPEYBOY@aol.com> wrote: > > > > I mentioned the same possibility of using this window unit in my Mustang > > II experimental. I'm no electrical engineer so don't quote me on this as I > > probably have it all backwards, but something about the amps that unit pulls > > is at the AC 110volt setting. It would supposedly pull more like 60 amps DC? > > Your L-29's may easily handle this, but that's pushing most DC > > alternators... > > Boyce > > > > > - The L29-List Email Forum - > > to browse > > Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, > > much more: > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List > > - NEW MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - > > the Web Forums! > > http://forums.matronics.com > > - NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI - > > Wiki! > > http://wiki.matronics.com > > - List Contribution Web Site - > > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. > > > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:15:08 PM PST US
    From: kelseyjewett <kelseyjewett@charter.net>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: kelseyjewett <kelseyjewett@charter.net> scott is probably on a trip kelsey On Aug 21, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Ernest Martinez wrote: > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > > Well whats the deal with the airconditioner??? I responded offline as > requested and also posted here for info, with no response. > > While I'm on the subject. I've come up with another idea for AC. While > I was at SAM's club the other day, I noticed this little bitty 5200 > BTU window unit which only draws 4.5 amps and weighs around 45 lbs. > The unit is assembled in 2 halves and looks like the > compressor/condensor unit is in the rear half, and the evaporator in > the front. Most window units have 2 fans, one for the evaporator and > one for the condensor. It sounds feasible that the > compressor/condensor section could be mounted in the radio bay in the > nose, and the refrigerant lines could be led through the bulkhead to > the evaporator unit in the cockpit. The unit costs $90, a 24v to 110V > 900 watt inverter is another $100. You would just need to install a > couple of relays so you can remotely control power to the inverter and > to the evaporator fan in the cockpit (you would need to run 110vac > through the bulkhead into the cokpit to power the evaporator fan). > Total cost of parts would be under $500. > > Since the recent post was for a 5200 btu AC unit and mentioned > inverters, sounds to me like someone came up with this idea already. > > Ernie > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:22:51 PM PST US
    From: "ROBERT SCHWARTZ" <schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "ROBERT SCHWARTZ" <schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net> what are the brand names of these little window units?? Robert E. Schwartz This information is intended for the use of individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the content of this information is strictly prohibited. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Colombo" <Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:45 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > --> L29-List message posted by: "Brian Colombo" <Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com> > > I think the inverter numbers are a bit off. here is the formula for power > invertes. This is for a 24v to 110/120 inverter > Here's the formula for all power inverter: Amps (needed) x (volts)110 V AC > > wattage of inverter needed > > 50amps needed for start X 110v =5500 watt inverter. I have a 1000 watt > inverter and it does not run much let alone a small AC unit. The inverter > needs a lot of air(on the ground is the only time this would be an issue) > or > it will overheat and trip fast. > > sure would be nice to have it though. I would also go as far as to put a > small boat type halon system in the nose if that was the place I vould run > have the compressor. Again big heat producer and they are not ment for > closed spaces. just my 2 cents. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > To: <l29-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:21 PM > Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > > >> --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> >> >> Not at all. You need to just use OHM's law and convert to power, 4.5 >> amps @ 110v = 495 watts, P=E x I ...conversly I = P/E so 495 watts >> divided by 24v = 20 amps at 24V. For startup current just double that >> value and that ups the startup current requirement to 40 amps, add 10% >> for Inverter inefficiency and you're in the neighborhood of 50 amps >> for startup, and about 25 amps while running. The inverter I saw for >> $100 was rated at 900 watts continuous with 1800 watts peak, more than >> enough for this application. I've never seen these tiny window units >> before, thats why I never considered using window units, but the >> weight and current draw of these little babies makes them viable. >> >> Also remember that the alternator need not be able to keep up with the >> momentary startup current requirements, since the battery will act as >> you current storage tank, the alternator just replenishes the current >> during continuous use. Even a 30 amp alternator would be able to >> supply 5 amps of charging current during continuous AC use, but I >> wouldnt recommend doing this with anything under a 50 amp alternator. >> >> Ernie >> >> On 8/21/06, RAMPEYBOY@aol.com <RAMPEYBOY@aol.com> wrote: >> > >> > I mentioned the same possibility of using this window unit in my > Mustang >> > II experimental. I'm no electrical engineer so don't quote me on this >> > as > I >> > probably have it all backwards, but something about the amps that unit > pulls >> > is at the AC 110volt setting. It would supposedly pull more like 60 >> > amps > DC? >> > Your L-29's may easily handle this, but that's pushing most DC >> > alternators... >> > Boyce >> > >> >> > - The L29-List Email Forum - >> > to browse >> > Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, >> > much more: >> > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List >> > - NEW MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - >> > the Web Forums! >> > http://forums.matronics.com >> > - NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI - >> > Wiki! >> > http://wiki.matronics.com >> > - List Contribution Web Site - >> > -Matt Dralle, List Admin. >> >> > >> >> >> > > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:29:22 PM PST US
    From: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    --> L29-List message posted by: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net> Lets plan on it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> > > Did you get more details??? Did I divulge trade secrets? :) > > Ernie > > Hey, I may fly out to Colorado Springs in Oct for the Bonanza > Convention, maybe we could hook up then. > > Ernie > > On 8/21/06, Bill <czech6@kellin.net> wrote: >> --> L29-List message posted by: "Bill" <czech6@kellin.net> >> >> It turned into "Big Business". He has a manager handling the sales and >> tech >> support. So as is the case with any "Big Business", red tape and lots of >> middle men. >> >> Bill >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> >> To: <l29-list@matronics.com> >> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:41 PM >> Subject: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner >> >> >> > --> L29-List message posted by: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29@gmail.com> >> > >> > Well whats the deal with the airconditioner??? I responded offline as >> > requested and also posted here for info, with no response. >> > >> > While I'm on the subject. I've come up with another idea for AC. While >> > I was at SAM's club the other day, I noticed this little bitty 5200 >> > BTU window unit which only draws 4.5 amps and weighs around 45 lbs. >> > The unit is assembled in 2 halves and looks like the >> > compressor/condensor unit is in the rear half, and the evaporator in >> > the front. Most window units have 2 fans, one for the evaporator and >> > one for the condensor. It sounds feasible that the >> > compressor/condensor section could be mounted in the radio bay in the >> > nose, and the refrigerant lines could be led through the bulkhead to >> > the evaporator unit in the cockpit. The unit costs $90, a 24v to 110V >> > 900 watt inverter is another $100. You would just need to install a >> > couple of relays so you can remotely control power to the inverter and >> > to the evaporator fan in the cockpit (you would need to run 110vac >> > through the bulkhead into the cokpit to power the evaporator fan). >> > Total cost of parts would be under $500. >> > >> > Since the recent post was for a 5200 btu AC unit and mentioned >> > inverters, sounds to me like someone came up with this idea already. >> > >> > Ernie >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:02:02 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    Hi Ernie, Sorry about the delay getting back to you. The full time flying job is the one that pays the bills and I've been busy with United. Then got side tracked with getting checked out in a L-39, which solves the AC problem as long as I don't go back and fly my L-29. LOL> I'll email you directly. Thanks.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:04:13 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    Sounds like we could just cut open the canopy and silicone in a home window mount AC unit and strap it down. That should work for until you get airborne... LOL


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:11:37 PM PST US
    From: "Brian Colombo" <Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    scott, e-mail me directly with info as well please. bcolombo@twcny.rr.com, Still need a tach/gen and tach if you know of anyone who might have a used one. brian ----- Original Message ----- From: SD737@aol.com To: l29-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner Hi Ernie, Sorry about the delay getting back to you. The full time flying job is the one that pays the bills and I've been busy with United. Then got side tracked with getting checked out in a L-39, which solves the AC problem as long as I don't go back and fly my L-29. LOL> I'll email you directly. Thanks.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:16:10 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    Hi Bill, Speaking of Red Tape, you coming to Reno Air Races. I most likely will be doing an engine change on my L-29 and any extra bureaucracy "help" would be welcomed.


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:24:40 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: M701 Thrust
    Hey guys, Thought I would post a question. My engine temps are quite good, but I don't develop the thrust/speed that my compadres possess during formation takeoff and also at formation cruise. At cruise in formation with EGT's matched I am turning about 4% more indicated RPM than my fellow L-29 buddies. i.e. I'm at 94% and they are at 90% with matched EGT and matched speed. I have talked to a few different guys and also a warbird shop on the field here at Reno, Stead and I have got a range of input on what to do such as: 1. Adjust the fuel controller to deliver more fuel since temps are good . 2. Wash the turbine blades 3. Put a smaller Nozzle on 4. Replace the engine with a factory zero time overhauled engine. Anyone else encounter this situation or have any suggestions. Thanks, Scott


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:00 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    Go for the new engine!!! -----Original Message----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:24 PM Subject: L29-List: M701 Thrust Hey guys, Thought I would post a question. My engine temps are quite good, but I don't develop the thrust/speed that my compadres possess during formation takeoff and also at formation cruise. At cruise in formation with EGT's matched I am turning about 4% more indicated RPM than my fellow L-29 buddies. i.e. I'm at 94% and they are at 90% with matched EGT and matched speed. I have talked to a few different guys and also a warbird shop on the field here at Reno, Stead and I have got a range of input on what to do such as: 1. Adjust the fuel controller to deliver more fuel since temps are good . 2. Wash the turbine blades 3. Put a smaller Nozzle on 4. Replace the engine with a factory zero time overhauled engine. Anyone else encounter this situation or have any suggestions. Thanks, Scott ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:25 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    I had a nose gear problem in my L-29 this weekend. A problem all of us can have due to a design flaw. Simple fix though. Will type up what happened and post it here and the CJAA web site tomorrow morning. (with photos) At work now and not enough time to type it up.....All ended up well though when I hit the mains down hard and got the nose wheel to lock before setting it down.... -----Original Message----- From: Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner scott, e-mail me directly with info as well please. bcolombo@twcny.rr.com, Still need a tach/gen and tach if you know of anyone who might have a used one. brian ----- Original Message ----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner Hi Ernie, Sorry about the delay getting back to you. The full time flying job is the one that pays the bills and I've been busy with United. Then got side tracked with getting checked out in a L-39, which solves the AC problem as long as I don't go back and fly my L-29. LOL> I'll email you directly. Thanks. .com/Navigator?L29-List ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:37:50 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    or just loose some weight.... -----Original Message----- From: colyergreg@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:34 PM Subject: Re: L29-List: M701 Thrust Go for the new engine!!! -----Original Message----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:24 PM Subject: L29-List: M701 Thrust Hey guys, Thought I would post a question. My engine temps are quite good, but I don't develop the thrust/speed that my compadres possess during formation takeoff and also at formation cruise. At cruise in formation with EGT's matched I am turning about 4% more indicated RPM than my fellow L-29 buddies. i.e. I'm at 94% and they are at 90% with matched EGT and matched speed. I have talked to a few different guys and also a warbird shop on the field here at Reno, Stead and I have got a range of input on what to do such as: 1. Adjust the fuel controller to deliver more fuel since temps are good . 2. Wash the turbine blades 3. Put a smaller Nozzle on 4. Replace the engine with a factory zero time overhauled engine. Anyone else encounter this situation or have any suggestions. Thanks, Scott ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:39:07 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    You gonna come to Reno during the air races and help me pull the thing? The engine that is!


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:40:14 PM PST US
    From: SD737@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Air Conditioner
    I heard it was pilot error! Or several errors.. LOL


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:41:11 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    of course!!! anything for you... -----Original Message----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:38 PM Subject: Re: L29-List: M701 Thrust You gonna come to Reno during the air races and help me pull the thing? The engine that is! ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:46:11 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re:nose gear problem
    Hey guys..I have a couple minutes so I will give you a quik run down with full story tomorrow... The four bolts/nuts that hold the nose gear door to the rod that connects to the nose wheel can come loose. Mine are flat head rounded tops that go through the door and through a rubber piece then with a thin metal plate held on by four 6 mm nuts. The metal plate bends up on the corners to hold the nuts. the problem is that this does not keep the screws from backing out as I found out. I had check it in preflight and all was well. in flight one nut came loose so when my front wheel tried to come down the bolt, which is about 2.5 inches long came out but not all the way so it prevented the door from opening all the way which inturn kept the nose wheel from locking down. will post complete story tomorrow with photos... -----Original Message----- From: colyergreg@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:37 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner I had a nose gear problem in my L-29 this weekend. A problem all of us can have due to a design flaw. Simple fix though. Will type up what happened and post it here and the CJAA web site tomorrow morning. (with photos) At work now and not enough time to type it up.....All ended up well though when I hit the mains down hard and got the nose wheel to lock before setting it down.... -----Original Message----- From: Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner scott, e-mail me directly with info as well please. bcolombo@twcny.rr.com, Still need a tach/gen and tach if you know of anyone who might have a used one. brian ----- Original Message ----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner Hi Ernie, Sorry about the delay getting back to you. The full time flying job is the one that pays the bills and I've been busy with United. Then got side tracked with getting checked out in a L-39, which solves the AC problem as long as I don't go back and fly my L-29. LOL> I'll email you directly. Thanks. .com/Navigator?L29-List ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:57:27 PM PST US
    From: "David M." <ainut@hiwaay.net>
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    Along that line, do any of you guys know what the equivalent horsepower the L-29 engine is putting out at cruise, say? I know it's not a direct comparison, yet crossover formulae do exist -- I just don't remember them :) Thanks, David M. SD737@aol.com wrote: > Hey guys, > > Thought I would post a question. > > My engine temps are quite good, but I don't develop the thrust/speed > that my compadres possess during formation takeoff and also at > formation cruise. > > At cruise in formation with EGT's matched I am turning about 4% more > indicated RPM than my fellow L-29 buddies. i.e. I'm at 94% and they > are at 90% with matched EGT and matched speed. > > I have talked to a few different guys and also a warbird shop on the > field here at Reno, Stead and I have got a range of input on what to > do such as: > > 1. Adjust the fuel controller to deliver more fuel since temps are good . > 2. Wash the turbine blades > 3. Put a smaller Nozzle on > 4. Replace the engine with a factory zero time overhauled engine. > > Anyone else encounter this situation or have any suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Scott > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:10:23 PM PST US
    From: colyergreg@aol.com
    Subject: Re:nose gear problem
    Just got another break so here is a bit more of what happened... Coming back into land. Gear down got green on the mains nothing on the nose. Tried a few more times cycling the gear while resetting the day switch, circut breaker etc. No luck. Tried pulling some G's (4) to swing the nose gear down with no luck. finally blew the gear down and still didn't have green light or proper stripes on the barber pole (missing one), flew by the airport had somebody on the ground give me a visual inspection who said gear didn't look down all the way. decided to hit the mains hard to see if it would knock the nose wheel into place, which it did. Upon exiting the a/c, I discovered the bolt sticking out of the door jammed against the bottom of the a/c which prevented the door from opening all the way and thus preventing the gear from locking down. I had checked the door before take off in the preflight and all was well. My fix was a lock washer, locking nut then also safty wired (just through the ends of each bolt to each other. Will post a photo tomorrow of it. Check your a/c and see if this is the way your nose gear door is. Like I said in previous post, the metal tabs bent against the nut don't keep the screw from undoing itself, just the nut!!! Greg -----Original Message----- From: colyergreg@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:45 PM Subject: L29-List: Re:nose gear problem Hey guys..I have a couple minutes so I will give you a quik run down with full story tomorrow... The four bolts/nuts that hold the nose gear door to the rod that connects to the nose wheel can come loose. Mine are flat head rounded tops that go through the door and through a rubber piece then with a thin metal plate held on by four 6 mm nuts. The metal plate bends up on the corners to hold the nuts. the problem is that this does not keep the screws from backing out as I found out. I had check it in preflight and all was well. in flight one nut came loose so when my front wheel tried to come down the bolt, which is about 2.5 inches long came out but not all the way so it prevented the door from opening all the way which inturn kept the nose wheel from locking down. will post complete story tomorrow with photos... -----Original Message----- From: colyergreg@aol.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:37 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner I had a nose gear problem in my L-29 this weekend. A problem all of us can have due to a design flaw. Simple fix though. Will type up what happened and post it here and the CJAA web site tomorrow morning. (with photos) At work now and not enough time to type it up.....All ended up well though when I hit the mains down hard and got the nose wheel to lock before setting it down.... -----Original Message----- From: Bcolombo@twcny.rr.com Sent: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 9:10 PM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner scott, e-mail me directly with info as well please. bcolombo@twcny.rr.com, Still need a tach/gen and tach if you know of anyone who might have a used one. brian ----- Original Message ----- From: SD737@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [SPAM] L29-List: Air Conditioner Hi Ernie, Sorry about the delay getting back to you. The full time flying job is the one that pays the bills and I've been busy with United. Then got side tracked with getting checked out in a L-39, which solves the AC problem as long as I don't go back and fly my L-29. LOL> I'll email you directly. Thanks. .com/Navigator?L29-List ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:28:48 PM PST US
    From: Jean de Roubin <delfin@mail.pf>
    Subject: Re: M701 Thrust
    Does the engine gives 100% at full throttle ? What is the EGT at full throttle ? What is the fuel pressure at 100% Does the runway take off lenth seems normal ? May-be you have to adjust the fuel controller to deliver less fuel Le 21 ao=FBt 06 =E0 18:24, SD737@aol.com a =E9crit : > Hey guys, > > Thought I would post a question. > > My engine temps are quite good, but I don't develop the thrust/ > speed that my compadres possess during formation takeoff and also > at formation cruise. > > At cruise in formation with EGT's matched I am turning about 4% > more indicated RPM than my fellow L-29 buddies. i.e. I'm at 94% and > they are at 90% with matched EGT and matched speed. > > I have talked to a few different guys and also a warbird shop on > the field here at Reno, Stead and I have got a range of input on > what to do such as: > > 1. Adjust the fuel controller to deliver more fuel since temps are > good . > 2. Wash the turbine blades > 3. Put a smaller Nozzle on > 4. Replace the engine with a factory zero time overhauled engine. > > Anyone else encounter this situation or have any suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Scott > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   l29-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/L29-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/l29-list
  • Browse L29-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/l29-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --