Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:40 PM - (delfin)
2. 05:03 PM - Re: (colyergreg@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
=0AI'm looking for some input about Hydraulic Fluid for the L-29.-- App
roved fluids =0Aare AMG-10, Royco 756, Aeroshell 4 and 41 and generally all
that meet Mil-H-5606 =0AH. =0A=0A=0AI know the Czechs used Aersoshell 41.
-- My question, Aeroshell 31 or comparable =0Aother brands are syntheti
c (but as per the Shell technical ref:) are =0Ainterchangable with 41, 4 et
c.- The advantage of 31 or similar is that it offers =0Amuch higher fire
resistance which is good.- Any reason not to use this other =0Athan cost?
-- Any comments- thanks=0A=0A=0A
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Amy 5606 is good
Greg
iPhone sent from
On Oct 2, 2010, at 3:31 PM, delfin <l29delfin@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I'm looking for some input about Hydraulic Fluid for the L-29. Approved f
luids are AMG-10, Royco 756, Aeroshell 4 and 41 and generally all that meet M
il-H-5606 H.
>
> I know the Czechs used Aersoshell 41. My question, Aeroshell 31 or compa
rable other brands are synthetic (but as per the Shell technical ref:) are i
nterchangable with 41, 4 etc. The advantage of 31 or similar is that it off
ers much higher fire resistance which is good. Any reason not to use this o
ther than cost? Any comments thanks
>
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|