Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 05:10 PM - Re: engine choices (Bill Geipel)
2. 06:01 PM - Re: engine choices (David)
3. 07:32 PM - Re: engine choices (Bill Geipel)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine choices |
Many vipers flying. What do you want to know?
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 19, 2011, at 18:31, David <ainut@knology.net> wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked into changing their engine over to a Williams or Rolls type
in order to get almost twice the fuel economy while losing none of the power
(fun?)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> --
> If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get
rid of Soros.
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine choices |
If anyone has done it. Do they actually get nearly twice the mileage
and have the same (or more) power?
David
Bill Geipel wrote:
> --> L29-List message posted by: Bill Geipel<czech6@mesanetworks.net>
>
> Many vipers flying. What do you want to know?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 19, 2011, at 18:31, David<ainut@knology.net> wrote:
>
>
>> --> L29-List message posted by: David<ainut@knology.net>
>>
>> Has anyone looked into changing their engine over to a Williams or Rolls type
in order to get almost twice the fuel economy while losing none of the power
(fun?)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> --
>> If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get
rid of Soros.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get rid
of Soros.
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine choices |
I have 3400 pounds of thrust, as opposed to 1960 standard.
Down low in the trees, I burn almost more fuel in an hour than the airplane holds.
However, I can climb at 6 to 8000 fpm to altitude and at altitude I burn less fuel.
At 24,000 I burn approximate 90 gal per hour. Stock engine about 115 gph.
75 to 100kts faster and 100+ miles further. Not twice the range. Who wants to sit
in that airplane for that long anyway. Terribly uncomfortable.
Great airplane.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 20, 2011, at 19:53, David <ainut@knology.net> wrote:
>
> If anyone has done it. Do they actually get nearly twice the mileage and have
the same (or more) power?
>
> David
>
>
>
> Bill Geipel wrote:
>> --> L29-List message posted by: Bill Geipel<czech6@mesanetworks.net>
>>
>> Many vipers flying. What do you want to know?
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 18:31, David<ainut@knology.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> --> L29-List message posted by: David<ainut@knology.net>
>>>
>>> Has anyone looked into changing their engine over to a Williams or Rolls type
in order to get almost twice the fuel economy while losing none of the power
(fun?)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get
rid of Soros.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism, and get
rid of Soros.
>
>
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|