Lightning-List Digest Archive

Thu 07/13/06


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:08 PM - Re: Lightning Flight review (Colin J. Kennedy)
     2. 08:05 PM - Re: Lightning Flight review (N1BZRich@AOL.COM)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:34 PM PST US
    From: "Colin J. Kennedy" <cjk129@cox.net>
    Subject: Lightning Flight review
    Buz, Thank you very much for taking the time to share your flight review. There are lots of us out here hanging on your every word. There has been some correspondence around what some judge to be light pitch control on the Esqual. I understand from your Lightning flight review that it is not quite as light in pitch. As you understand the fuselage modifications, would you expect them to effect pitch control in any way? Now we just need you to fly and review a Lightning with the modified fuselage. Get back to work! :-) Colin K. Oklahoma


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:41 PM PST US
    From: N1BZRich@AOL.COM
    Subject: Re: Lightning Flight review
    In a message dated 7/13/2006 8:09:24 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, cjk129@cox.net writes: As you understand the fuselage modifications, would you expect them to effect pitch control in any way? Hi Colin, Good to hear from you. The Lightning fuselage modifications result in a lighter fuselage. Most of the excess weight was removed from the tail (initially it was way overbuilt), so it will not be as tail heavy - therefore less pitch sensitive as the CG moves forward. Another modification that Nick made was to make the elevator aerodynamic counter balances smaller. Now they actually are behind a section of the stabilizer instead of out in clean air. Nick thought the initial design (when they were out in clean air) made the Lightning a little too pitch sensitive. Kind of flew like the aft CG, 80 HP Hybrid before Nick made the counterbalance mod. Hope this makes sense. I wish I had a picture to send. Remember the Esqual does not have aerodynamic counter balances at all, just the elevator hinges behind the stabilizer. The Lightning was designed that way because it will cruise faster and Nick didn't want the extra speed to make the pitch forces increase as speed goes up. The RV series of aircraft do this - in fact most aircraft do this if they don't have boosted controls. In effect, the Lightning has aerodynamically boosted elevators. The rudder on the Lightning is also aerodynamically boosted for the same reason (faster cruise) and the result is more effective rudder and a lighter rudder feel. It is really nice. The Esqual's rudder feels slightly heavy to me. Yes, I do think my Esqual is slightly more pitch sensitive than the prototype Lightning as it is now. But remember, other than the Hybrid (Lightning wings on Esqual fuselage) this is the only Esqual I have flown and it has lots of mods. To give you an idea of how sensitive it is, 20 pilots have now flown my Esqual. Most of them in the left seat. Their experience ranged from a 150 hour Cherokee pilot to multiple thousands of hour air line types. Only three did not initially over control in pitch. They were two current Pitts pilots and a Lady pilot (FAA examiner) with lots of time in many types including lots of glider time. (Note: She has ordered a Lightning Kit.) However, having said the above. All 20 of them flew 31BZ with no problems after the initial minute or two to get used to the stick feel. In fact, one had never flown an airplane with a stick. The point being is that all of them flew it fine after they got their "hands calibrated". So far a Lightning with the lighter fuselage has not flown. Earl's will be the first and it is about ready for the FAA inspection. As I understand it, Nick will make the initial flight/flights and then Earl will take over. I am sure he will share his thoughts after flying it for a while. Remember, Pete, Nick, and all the Arion crew will insure the total allowable CG range will be test flown before kits are released. Other than two Lightning dealers, Earl's is the first customer kit. Just to reiterate, my overall impression of the Lightning is "outstanding". I have to keep telling myself - this is not an aerobatic airplane. It is a beautiful design that looks like it is going Mach 2 just sitting on the ramp. It is a great flying sport aircraft that has amazing speed on a very economical fuel burn and all other performance factors, such as take off roll and landing roll, are also very impressive because of the low stall speed. It handles like a sport plane with spirited performance. You will love it. I want one. Blue Skies, Buz




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   lightning-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Lightning-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/lightning-list
  • Browse Lightning-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/lightning-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --