Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:40 AM - Prop (Daniel DW)
2. 07:24 AM - Re: Prop (N1BZRich@AOL.COM)
3. 07:56 AM - Re: Prop (Daniel DW)
4. 08:26 AM - Re: Prop (N1BZRich@AOL.COM)
5. 08:43 AM - Re: Prop (James, Clive R)
6. 09:21 AM - Real cruise speed (rimorbod)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi=2C
any one flying an Esqual with a Sensenich 64x53 wooden prop? on a Jabiru 33
00I would appreciate a short reply.
Kind regards
Danny
Esqual
PH-DWD
_________________________________________________________________
Alle fun stuff van Messenger nu verzameld op =E9=E9n coole site!
http://www.messengerbillboard.be/nl
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Danny,
The Sensenich W64ZK53 is one of the props that I have tried in the past
on my modified Esqual with a 3300 solid lifter engine. Actually I have tried
a 64ZK51, 53, & a 54, a carbon fiber ground adjustable, a 62FK58, and am
currently using a 64ZK55. The 62FK58 was slightly faster at WOT, but not at
cruise rpms. None of the props I have tried "have been enough prop" as I have
been able to over speed the engine's max rpm of 3300 at WOT with all of them.
I am currently waiting on a 62FK60 in hopes that it will be the right prop.
You would think that the ground adjustable (same diameter and blade profile
as the ZK) with the pitch adjusted to 56 or so would do the trick, but for
some reason it is just not at efficient at the higher rpms as the straight
wooden props. With the ground adjustable adjusted to 54 inch pitch it is some
5
to 8 mph slower than a wooded 64ZK54. Where ever I sat the pitch of the
ground adjustable it seemed to loose efficiency when compared to a wooded prop
of
the same diameter and pitch when above about 150 mph true airspeed.
How is your Esqual flying?
Blue Skies,
Buz
**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Buz=2C
thanks for the information.
I have a W64ZK53 on the shelf.
The first (and only) flight with my Esqual was with the W64ZK51.
For every change I have to show the local FAA an airworthiness certificate
of an aircraft with exactly the same configuration (meaning: engine=2C air
craft and prop).
That's why I'm looking for such a document and the reason for my e-mail.
We lost a lot of time in the paintshop but hope to have the aircraft ready
by the end of November.Kind regards
Danny
From: N1BZRich@aol.comDate: Sat=2C 4 Oct 2008 10:24:10 -0400Subject: Re: Li
ghtning-List: PropTo: lightning-list@matronics.com
Hi Danny=2C
The Sensenich W64ZK53 is one of the props that I have tried in the past
on my modified Esqual with a 3300 solid lifter engine. Actually I have tr
ied a 64ZK51=2C 53=2C & a 54=2C a carbon fiber ground adjustable=2C a 62FK5
8=2C and am currently using a 64ZK55. The 62FK58 was slightly faster at WO
T=2C but not at cruise rpms. None of the props I have tried "have been eno
ugh prop" as I have been able to over speed the engine's max rpm of 3300 at
WOT with all of them. I am currently waiting on a 62FK60 in hopes that it
will be the right prop. You would think that the ground adjustable (same
diameter and blade profile as the ZK) with the pitch adjusted to 56 or so w
ould do the trick=2C but for some reason it is just not at efficient at the
higher rpms as the straight wooden props. With the ground adjustable adju
sted to 54 inch pitch it is some 5 to 8 mph slower than a wooded 64ZK54. W
here ever I sat the pitch of the ground adjustable it seemed to loose effic
iency when compared to a wooded prop of the same diameter and pitch when ab
ove about 150 mph true airspeed.
How is your Esqual flying?
Blue Skies=2C
Buz
New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining=2C Mo
vies=2C Events=2C News & more. Try it out!
_________________________________________________________________
Alle fun stuff van Messenger nu verzameld op =E9=E9n coole site!
http://www.messengerbillboard.be/nl
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
In a message dated 10/4/2008 10:56:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ddw55@hotmail.com writes:
For every change I have to show the local FAA an airworthiness certificate
of an aircraft with exactly the same configuration (meaning: engine, aircraft
and prop).
Wow, your guys are tough over there. Makes it hard to do any real
experimenting in an efficient manner.
Good luck with your "jet".
Buz
**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Danny, I have that one on mine, can you not refer to my aircraft? PH-GCJ
CJ
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-lightning-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-lightning-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Daniel
DW
Sent: 04 October 2008 15:56
Subject: RE: Lightning-List: Prop
Hi Buz,
thanks for the information.
I have a W64ZK53 on the shelf.
The first (and only) flight with my Esqual was with the W64ZK51.
For every change I have to show the local FAA an airworthiness
certificate of an aircraft with exactly the same configuration (meaning:
engine, aircraft and prop).
That's why I'm looking for such a document and the reason for my e-mail.
We lost a lot of time in the paintshop but hope to have the aircraft
ready by the end of November.
Kind regards
Danny
________________________________
From: N1BZRich@aol.com
Subject: Re: Lightning-List: Prop
Hi Danny,
The Sensenich W64ZK53 is one of the props that I have tried in the
past on my modified Esqual with a 3300 solid lifter engine. Actually I
have tried a 64ZK51, 53, & a 54, a carbon fiber ground adjustable, a
62FK58, and am currently using a 64ZK55. The 62FK58 was slightly faster
at WOT, but not at cruise rpms. None of the props I have tried "have
been enough prop" as I have been able to over speed the engine's max rpm
of 3300 at WOT with all of them. I am currently waiting on a 62FK60 in
hopes that it will be the right prop. You would think that the ground
adjustable (same diameter and blade profile as the ZK) with the pitch
adjusted to 56 or so would do the trick, but for some reason it is just
not at efficient at the higher rpms as the straight wooden props. With
the ground adjustable adjusted to 54 inch pitch it is some 5 to 8 mph
slower than a wooded 64ZK54. Where ever I sat the pitch of the ground
adjustable it seemed to loose efficiency when compared to a wooded prop
of the same diameter and pitch when above about 150 mph true airspeed.
How is your Esqual flying?
Blue Skies,
Buz
________________________________
New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining,
Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out
<http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001> !
st" target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List
ttp://forums.matronics.com
=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
________________________________
Start het nieuwe schooljaar sterk en voordelig! Windows
<http://www.startsterk.be>
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Real cruise speed |
Hi!
I have got a question to owner's an aircraft lightning. I would like to know what
are the real cruise speed (TAS) and maximum speed (in practice).
Does anyone know?
R
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p 7364#207364
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|